From 68db79862227885bb5d4794c2636e1749e36e574 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Parrett Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:52:51 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix a couple typos in contributing docs (#13956) # Objective Fix a couple typos ## Solution Fix em --- CONTRIBUTING.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md index 912b02ae71..92ea2d0b6f 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -258,8 +258,8 @@ Once that's ready, get a sign-off on the broad vision and goals from the appropr This is the primary review step: maintainers and SMEs should be broadly patient and supportive even if they're skeptical until a proper design doc is in hand to evaluate. With a sign-off in hand, post the design doc to [Github Discussions](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions) with the [`C-Design-Doc` label](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions?discussions_q=is%3Aopen+label%3A%22C-Design+Doc%22) for archival purposes and begin work on implementation. -Post PRs that you need review on in your group's forum thread, ask for advice, and share the load. -Controversial PRs are still `S-Controversial`, but with a sign-off-in-priniciple, things should go more smoothly. +Post PRs that you need reviews on in your group's forum thread, ask for advice, and share the load. +Controversial PRs are still `S-Controversial`, but with a sign-off-in-principle, things should go more smoothly. If work peters out and the initiative dies, maintainers can wind down working groups (in consultation with SMEs and the working group itself). This is normal and expected: projects fail for all sorts of reasons!