custom
38 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
0cb3eaef67
|
Fix validation errors in Fox.glb (#17801)
# Objective Fix gltf validation errors in `Fox.glb`. Inspired by #8099, but that issue doesn't appear to describe a real bug to fix, as far as I can tell. ## Solution Use the latest version of the Fox from [glTF-Sample-Assets](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-Sample-Assets/blob/main/Models/Fox/glTF-Binary/Fox.glb). ## Testing Dropped both versions in https://github.khronos.org/glTF-Validator/ `cargo run --example animated_mesh` seems to still look fine. Before: ``` The asset contains errors. "numErrors": 126, "numWarnings": 4184, ``` After: ``` The asset is valid. "numErrors": 0, "numWarnings": 0, ``` ## Discussion The 3d testbed was panicking with ``` thread 'main' panicked at examples/testbed/3d.rs:288:60: called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: QueryDoesNotMatch(35v1 with components Transform, GlobalTransform, Visibility, InheritedVisibility, ViewVisibility, ChildOf, Children, Name) ``` Which is bizarre. I think this might be related to #17720, or maybe the structure of the gltf changed. I fixed it by using updating the testbed to use a more robust method of finding the correct entity as is done in `animated_mesh`. |
||
![]() |
81a25bb0c7
|
Procedural atmospheric scattering (#16314)
Implement procedural atmospheric scattering from [Sebastien Hillaire's 2020 paper](https://sebh.github.io/publications/egsr2020.pdf). This approach should scale well even down to mobile hardware, and is physically accurate. ## Co-author: @mate-h He helped massively with getting this over the finish line, ensuring everything was physically correct, correcting several places where I had misunderstood or misapplied the paper, and improving the performance in several places as well. Thanks! ## Credits @aevyrie: helped find numerous bugs and improve the example to best show off this feature :) Built off of @mtsr's original branch, which handled the transmittance lut (arguably the most important part) ## Showcase:   ## For followup - Integrate with pcwalton's volumetrics code - refactor/reorganize for better integration with other effects - have atmosphere transmittance affect directional lights - add support for generating skybox/environment map --------- Co-authored-by: Emerson Coskey <56370779+EmersonCoskey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: atlv <email@atlasdostal.com> Co-authored-by: JMS55 <47158642+JMS55@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Emerson Coskey <coskey@emerlabs.net> Co-authored-by: Máté Homolya <mate.homolya@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
bf3692a011
|
Introduce support for mixed lighting by allowing lights to opt out of contributing diffuse light to lightmapped objects. (#16761)
This PR adds support for *mixed lighting* to Bevy, whereby some parts of the scene are lightmapped, while others take part in real-time lighting. (Here *real-time lighting* means lighting at runtime via the PBR shader, as opposed to precomputed light using lightmaps.) It does so by adding a new field, `affects_lightmapped_meshes` to `IrradianceVolume` and `AmbientLight`, and a corresponding field `affects_lightmapped_mesh_diffuse` to `DirectionalLight`, `PointLight`, `SpotLight`, and `EnvironmentMapLight`. By default, this value is set to true; when set to false, the light contributes nothing to the diffuse irradiance component to meshes with lightmaps. Note that specular light is unaffected. This is because the correct way to bake specular lighting is *directional lightmaps*, which we have no support for yet. There are two general ways I expect this field to be used: 1. When diffuse indirect light is baked into lightmaps, irradiance volumes and reflection probes shouldn't contribute any diffuse light to the static geometry that has a lightmap. That's because the baking tool should have already accounted for it, and in a higher-quality fashion, as lightmaps typically offer a higher effective texture resolution than the light probe does. 2. When direct diffuse light is baked into a lightmap, punctual lights shouldn't contribute any diffuse light to static geometry with a lightmap, to avoid double-counting. It may seem odd to bake *direct* light into a lightmap, as opposed to indirect light. But there is a use case: in a scene with many lights, avoiding light leaks requires shadow mapping, which quickly becomes prohibitive when many lights are involved. Baking lightmaps allows light leaks to be eliminated on static geometry. A new example, `mixed_lighting`, has been added. It demonstrates a sofa (model from the [glTF Sample Assets]) that has been lightmapped offline using [Bakery]. It has four modes: 1. In *baked* mode, all objects are locked in place, and all the diffuse direct and indirect light has been calculated ahead of time. Note that the bottom of the sphere has a red tint from the sofa, illustrating that the baking tool captured indirect light for it. 2. In *mixed direct* mode, lightmaps capturing diffuse direct and indirect light have been pre-calculated for the static objects, but the dynamic sphere has real-time lighting. Note that, because the diffuse lighting has been entirely pre-calculated for the scenery, the dynamic sphere casts no shadow. In a real app, you would typically use real-time lighting for the most important light so that dynamic objects can shadow the scenery and relegate baked lighting to the less important lights for which shadows aren't as important. Also note that there is no red tint on the sphere, because there is no global illumination applied to it. In an actual game, you could fix this problem by supplementing the lightmapped objects with an irradiance volume. 3. In *mixed indirect* mode, all direct light is calculated in real-time, and the static objects have pre-calculated indirect lighting. This corresponds to the mode that most applications are expected to use. Because direct light on the scenery is computed dynamically, shadows are fully supported. As in mixed direct mode, there is no global illumination on the sphere; in a real application, irradiance volumes could be used to supplement the lightmaps. 4. In *real-time* mode, no lightmaps are used at all, and all punctual lights are rendered in real-time. No global illumination exists. In the example, you can click around to move the sphere, unless you're in baked mode, in which case the sphere must be locked in place to be lit correctly. ## Showcase Baked mode:  Mixed direct mode:  Mixed indirect mode (default):  Real-time mode:  ## Migration guide * The `AmbientLight` resource, the `IrradianceVolume` component, and the `EnvironmentMapLight` component now have `affects_lightmapped_meshes` fields. If you don't need to use that field (for example, if you aren't using lightmaps), you can safely set the field to true. * `DirectionalLight`, `PointLight`, and `SpotLight` now have `affects_lightmapped_mesh_diffuse` fields. If you don't need to use that field (for example, if you aren't using lightmaps), you can safely set the field to true. [glTF Sample Assets]: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-Sample-Assets/tree/main [Bakery]: https://geom.io/bakery/wiki/index.php?title=Bakery_-_GPU_Lightmapper |
||
![]() |
3fc2bd71ea
|
Cosmetic tweaks to query_gltf_primitives (#16102)
# Objective This example is really confusing to look at and tell at a glance whether it's broken or not. It's displaying a strange shape -- a cube with two vertices stretched in a couple dimensions at an odd angle, and doing its vertex position modification in a way where the intent isn't obvious. ## Solution - Change the gltf geometry so that the object is a recognizable regular shape - Change the vertex modification so that the entire cube top is being "lifted" from the cube - Adjust colors, lighting, and camera location so we can see what's going on - Also remove some irrelevant shadow and environment map setup ## Before  ## After <img width="1280" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/59cab60d-efbc-47c3-8688-e4544b462421"> |
||
![]() |
78a3aae81b
|
feat(gltf): add name component to gltf mesh primitive (#13912)
# Objective - fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/13473 ## Solution - When a single mesh is assigned multiple materials, it is divided into several primitive nodes, with each primitive assigned a unique material. Presently, these primitives are named using the format Mesh.index, which complicates querying. To improve this, we can assign a specific name to each primitive based on the material’s name, since each primitive corresponds to one material exclusively. ## Testing - I have included a simple example which shows how to query a material and mesh part based on the new name component. ## Changelog - adds `GltfMaterialName` component to the mesh entity of the gltf primitive node. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
2ae5a21009
|
Implement percentage-closer soft shadows (PCSS). (#13497)
[*Percentage-closer soft shadows*] are a technique from 2004 that allow shadows to become blurrier farther from the objects that cast them. It works by introducing a *blocker search* step that runs before the normal shadow map sampling. The blocker search step detects the difference between the depth of the fragment being rasterized and the depth of the nearby samples in the depth buffer. Larger depth differences result in a larger penumbra and therefore a blurrier shadow. To enable PCSS, fill in the `soft_shadow_size` value in `DirectionalLight`, `PointLight`, or `SpotLight`, as appropriate. This shadow size value represents the size of the light and should be tuned as appropriate for your scene. Higher values result in a wider penumbra (i.e. blurrier shadows). When using PCSS, temporal shadow maps (`ShadowFilteringMethod::Temporal`) are recommended. If you don't use `ShadowFilteringMethod::Temporal` and instead use `ShadowFilteringMethod::Gaussian`, Bevy will use the same technique as `Temporal`, but the result won't vary over time. This produces a rather noisy result. Doing better would likely require downsampling the shadow map, which would be complex and slower (and would require PR #13003 to land first). In addition to PCSS, this commit makes the near Z plane for the shadow map configurable on a per-light basis. Previously, it had been hardcoded to 0.1 meters. This change was necessary to make the point light shadow map in the example look reasonable, as otherwise the shadows appeared far too aliased. A new example, `pcss`, has been added. It demonstrates the percentage-closer soft shadow technique with directional lights, point lights, spot lights, non-temporal operation, and temporal operation. The assets are my original work. Both temporal and non-temporal shadows are rather noisy in the example, and, as mentioned before, this is unavoidable without downsampling the depth buffer, which we can't do yet. Note also that the shadows don't look particularly great for point lights; the example simply isn't an ideal scene for them. Nevertheless, I felt that the benefits of the ability to do a side-by-side comparison of directional and point lights outweighed the unsightliness of the point light shadows in that example, so I kept the point light feature in. Fixes #3631. [*Percentage-closer soft shadows*]: https://developer.download.nvidia.com/shaderlibrary/docs/shadow_PCSS.pdf ## Changelog ### Added * Percentage-closer soft shadows (PCSS) are now supported, allowing shadows to become blurrier as they stretch away from objects. To use them, set the `soft_shadow_size` field in `DirectionalLight`, `PointLight`, or `SpotLight`, as applicable. * The near Z value for shadow maps is now customizable via the `shadow_map_near_z` field in `DirectionalLight`, `PointLight`, and `SpotLight`. ## Screenshots PCSS off:  PCSS on:  --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Torstein Grindvik <52322338+torsteingrindvik@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
![]() |
4d3f43131e
|
Use a ship in Transform::align example (#13935)
# Objective The documentation for [`Transform::align`](https://docs.rs/bevy/0.14.0-rc.3/bevy/transform/components/struct.Transform.html#method.align) mentions a hypothetical ship model. Showing this concretely would be a nice improvement over using a cube. > For example, if a spaceship model has its nose pointing in the X-direction in its own local coordinates and its dorsal fin pointing in the Y-direction, then align(Dir3::X, v, Dir3::Y, w) will make the spaceship’s nose point in the direction of v, while the dorsal fin does its best to point in the direction w. ## Solution This commit makes the ship less hypothetical by using a kenney ship model in the example. The local axes for the ship needed to change to accommodate the gltf, so the hypothetical in the documentation and this example's local axes don't necessarily match. Docs use `align(Dir3::X, v, Dir3::Y, w)` and this example now uses `(Vec3::NEG_Z, *first, Vec3::X, *second)`. I manually modified the `craft_speederD` Node's `translation` to be 0,0,0 in the gltf file, which means it now differs from kenney's original model. Original ship from: https://kenney.nl/assets/space-kit ## Testing ``` cargo run --example align ```    |
||
![]() |
df8ccb8735
|
Implement PBR anisotropy per KHR_materials_anisotropy . (#13450)
This commit implements support for physically-based anisotropy in Bevy's `StandardMaterial`, following the specification for the [`KHR_materials_anisotropy`] glTF extension. [*Anisotropy*] (not to be confused with [anisotropic filtering]) is a PBR feature that allows roughness to vary along the tangent and bitangent directions of a mesh. In effect, this causes the specular light to stretch out into lines instead of a round lobe. This is useful for modeling brushed metal, hair, and similar surfaces. Support for anisotropy is a common feature in major game and graphics engines; Unity, Unreal, Godot, three.js, and Blender all support it to varying degrees. Two new parameters have been added to `StandardMaterial`: `anisotropy_strength` and `anisotropy_rotation`. Anisotropy strength, which ranges from 0 to 1, represents how much the roughness differs between the tangent and the bitangent of the mesh. In effect, it controls how stretched the specular highlight is. Anisotropy rotation allows the roughness direction to differ from the tangent of the model. In addition to these two fixed parameters, an *anisotropy texture* can be supplied. Such a texture should be a 3-channel RGB texture, where the red and green values specify a direction vector using the same conventions as a normal map ([0, 1] color values map to [-1, 1] vector values), and the the blue value represents the strength. This matches the format that the [`KHR_materials_anisotropy`] specification requires. Such textures should be loaded as linear and not sRGB. Note that this texture does consume one additional texture binding in the standard material shader. The glTF loader has been updated to properly parse the `KHR_materials_anisotropy` extension. A new example, `anisotropy`, has been added. This example loads and displays the barn lamp example from the [`glTF-Sample-Assets`] repository. Note that the textures were rather large, so I shrunk them down and converted them to a mixture of JPEG and KTX2 format, in the interests of saving space in the Bevy repository. [*Anisotropy*]: https://google.github.io/filament/Filament.md.html#materialsystem/anisotropicmodel [anisotropic filtering]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisotropic_filtering [`KHR_materials_anisotropy`]: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF/blob/main/extensions/2.0/Khronos/KHR_materials_anisotropy/README.md [`glTF-Sample-Assets`]: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-Sample-Assets/ ## Changelog ### Added * Physically-based anisotropy is now available for materials, which enhances the look of surfaces such as brushed metal or hair. glTF scenes can use the new feature with the `KHR_materials_anisotropy` extension. ## Screenshots With anisotropy:  Without anisotropy:  |
||
![]() |
d26900a9ea
|
add handling of all missing gltf extras: scene, mesh & materials (#13453)
# Objective - fixes #4823 ## Solution As outlined in the discussion in the linked issue as the best current solution, this PR adds specific GltfExtras for - scenes - meshes - materials - As it is , it is not a breaking change, I hesitated to rename the current "GltfExtras" component to "PrimitiveGltfExtras", but that would result in a breaking change and might be a bit confusing as to what "primitive" that refers to. ## Testing - I included a bare-bones example & asset (exported gltf file from Blender) with gltf extras at all the relevant levels : scene, mesh, material --- ## Changelog - adds "SceneGltfExtras" injected at the scene level if any - adds "MeshGltfExtras", injected at the mesh level if any - adds "MaterialGltfExtras", injected at the mesh level if any: ie if a mesh has a material that has gltf extras, the component will be injected there. |
||
![]() |
5a1c62faae
|
fix lava emissive strength in depth of field example (#13449)
# Objective - Since #13350 the lava is way too bright  ## Solution - Change the emissive value in the material in the glb file from 20000 to 20 ## Testing - Run the example `depth_of_field` |
||
![]() |
19bfa41768
|
Implement volumetric fog and volumetric lighting, also known as light shafts or god rays. (#13057)
This commit implements a more physically-accurate, but slower, form of fog than the `bevy_pbr::fog` module does. Notably, this *volumetric fog* allows for light beams from directional lights to shine through, creating what is known as *light shafts* or *god rays*. To add volumetric fog to a scene, add `VolumetricFogSettings` to the camera, and add `VolumetricLight` to directional lights that you wish to be volumetric. `VolumetricFogSettings` has numerous settings that allow you to define the accuracy of the simulation, as well as the look of the fog. Currently, only interaction with directional lights that have shadow maps is supported. Note that the overhead of the effect scales directly with the number of directional lights in use, so apply `VolumetricLight` sparingly for the best results. The overall algorithm, which is implemented as a postprocessing effect, is a combination of the techniques described in [Scratchapixel] and [this blog post]. It uses raymarching in screen space, transformed into shadow map space for sampling and combined with physically-based modeling of absorption and scattering. Bevy employs the widely-used [Henyey-Greenstein phase function] to model asymmetry; this essentially allows light shafts to fade into and out of existence as the user views them. Volumetric rendering is a huge subject, and I deliberately kept the scope of this commit small. Possible follow-ups include: 1. Raymarching at a lower resolution. 2. A post-processing blur (especially useful when combined with (1)). 3. Supporting point lights and spot lights. 4. Supporting lights with no shadow maps. 5. Supporting irradiance volumes and reflection probes. 6. Voxel components that reuse the volumetric fog code to create voxel shapes. 7. *Horizon: Zero Dawn*-style clouds. These are all useful, but out of scope of this patch for now, to keep things tidy and easy to review. A new example, `volumetric_fog`, has been added to demonstrate the effect. ## Changelog ### Added * A new component, `VolumetricFog`, is available, to allow for a more physically-accurate, but more resource-intensive, form of fog. * A new component, `VolumetricLight`, can be placed on directional lights to make them interact with `VolumetricFog`. Notably, this allows such lights to emit light shafts/god rays.   [Scratchapixel]: https://www.scratchapixel.com/lessons/3d-basic-rendering/volume-rendering-for-developers/intro-volume-rendering.html [this blog post]: https://www.alexandre-pestana.com/volumetric-lights/ [Henyey-Greenstein phase function]: https://www.pbr-book.org/4ed/Volume_Scattering/Phase_Functions#TheHenyeyndashGreensteinPhaseFunction |
||
![]() |
df31b808c3
|
Implement fast depth of field as a postprocessing effect. (#13009)
This commit implements the [depth of field] effect, simulating the blur of objects out of focus of the virtual lens. Either the [hexagonal bokeh] effect or a faster Gaussian blur may be used. In both cases, the implementation is a simple separable two-pass convolution. This is not the most physically-accurate real-time bokeh technique that exists; Unreal Engine has [a more accurate implementation] of "cinematic depth of field" from 2018. However, it's simple, and most engines provide something similar as a fast option, often called "mobile" depth of field. The general approach is outlined in [a blog post from 2017]. We take advantage of the fact that both Gaussian blurs and hexagonal bokeh blurs are *separable*. This means that their 2D kernels can be reduced to a small number of 1D kernels applied one after another, asymptotically reducing the amount of work that has to be done. Gaussian blurs can be accomplished by blurring horizontally and then vertically, while hexagonal bokeh blurs can be done with a vertical blur plus a diagonal blur, plus two diagonal blurs. In both cases, only two passes are needed. Bokeh requires the first pass to have a second render target and requires two subpasses in the second pass, which decreases its performance relative to the Gaussian blur. The bokeh blur is generally more aesthetically pleasing than the Gaussian blur, as it simulates the effect of a camera more accurately. The shape of the bokeh circles are determined by the number of blades of the aperture. In our case, we use a hexagon, which is usually considered specific to lower-quality cameras. (This is a downside of the fast hexagon approach compared to the higher-quality approaches.) The blur amount is generally specified by the [f-number], which we use to compute the focal length from the film size and FOV. By default, we simulate standard cinematic cameras of f/1 and [Super 35]. The developer can customize these values as desired. A new example has been added to demonstrate depth of field. It allows customization of the mode (Gaussian vs. bokeh), focal distance and f-numbers. The test scene is inspired by a [blog post on depth of field in Unity]; however, the effect is implemented in a completely different way from that blog post, and all the assets (textures, etc.) are original. Bokeh depth of field:  Gaussian depth of field:  No depth of field:  [depth of field]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field [hexagonal bokeh]: https://colinbarrebrisebois.com/2017/04/18/hexagonal-bokeh-blur-revisited/ [a more accurate implementation]: https://epicgames.ent.box.com/s/s86j70iamxvsuu6j35pilypficznec04 [a blog post from 2017]: https://colinbarrebrisebois.com/2017/04/18/hexagonal-bokeh-blur-revisited/ [f-number]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number [Super 35]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_35 [blog post on depth of field in Unity]: https://catlikecoding.com/unity/tutorials/advanced-rendering/depth-of-field/ ## Changelog ### Added * A depth of field postprocessing effect is now available, to simulate objects being out of focus of the camera. To use it, add `DepthOfFieldSettings` to an entity containing a `Camera3d` component. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Bram Buurlage <brambuurlage@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
77ed72bc16
|
Implement clearcoat per the Filament and the KHR_materials_clearcoat specifications. (#13031)
Clearcoat is a separate material layer that represents a thin translucent layer of a material. Examples include (from the [Filament spec]) car paint, soda cans, and lacquered wood. This commit implements support for clearcoat following the Filament and Khronos specifications, marking the beginnings of support for multiple PBR layers in Bevy. The [`KHR_materials_clearcoat`] specification describes the clearcoat support in glTF. In Blender, applying a clearcoat to the Principled BSDF node causes the clearcoat settings to be exported via this extension. As of this commit, Bevy parses and reads the extension data when present in glTF. Note that the `gltf` crate has no support for `KHR_materials_clearcoat`; this patch therefore implements the JSON semantics manually. Clearcoat is integrated with `StandardMaterial`, but the code is behind a series of `#ifdef`s that only activate when clearcoat is present. Additionally, the `pbr_feature_layer_material_textures` Cargo feature must be active in order to enable support for clearcoat factor maps, clearcoat roughness maps, and clearcoat normal maps. This approach mirrors the same pattern used by the existing transmission feature and exists to avoid running out of texture bindings on platforms like WebGL and WebGPU. Note that constant clearcoat factors and roughness values *are* supported in the browser; only the relatively-less-common maps are disabled on those platforms. This patch refactors the lighting code in `StandardMaterial` significantly in order to better support multiple layers in a natural way. That code was due for a refactor in any case, so this is a nice improvement. A new demo, `clearcoat`, has been added. It's based on [the corresponding three.js demo], but all the assets (aside from the skybox and environment map) are my original work. [Filament spec]: https://google.github.io/filament/Filament.html#materialsystem/clearcoatmodel [`KHR_materials_clearcoat`]: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF/blob/main/extensions/2.0/Khronos/KHR_materials_clearcoat/README.md [the corresponding three.js demo]: https://threejs.org/examples/webgl_materials_physical_clearcoat.html   ## Changelog ### Added * `StandardMaterial` now supports a clearcoat layer, which represents a thin translucent layer over an underlying material. * The glTF loader now supports the `KHR_materials_clearcoat` extension, representing materials with clearcoat layers. ## Migration Guide * The lighting functions in the `pbr_lighting` WGSL module now have clearcoat parameters, if `STANDARD_MATERIAL_CLEARCOAT` is defined. * The `R` reflection vector parameter has been removed from some lighting functions, as it was unused. |
||
![]() |
31835ff76d
|
Implement visibility ranges, also known as hierarchical levels of detail (HLODs). (#12916)
Implement visibility ranges, also known as hierarchical levels of detail (HLODs). This commit introduces a new component, `VisibilityRange`, which allows developers to specify camera distances in which meshes are to be shown and hidden. Hiding meshes happens early in the rendering pipeline, so this feature can be used for level of detail optimization. Additionally, this feature is properly evaluated per-view, so different views can show different levels of detail. This feature differs from proper mesh LODs, which can be implemented later. Engines generally implement true mesh LODs later in the pipeline; they're typically more efficient than HLODs with GPU-driven rendering. However, mesh LODs are more limited than HLODs, because they require the lower levels of detail to be meshes with the same vertex layout and shader (and perhaps the same material) as the original mesh. Games often want to use objects other than meshes to replace distant models, such as *octahedral imposters* or *billboard imposters*. The reason why the feature is called *hierarchical level of detail* is that HLODs can replace multiple meshes with a single mesh when the camera is far away. This can be useful for reducing drawcall count. Note that `VisibilityRange` doesn't automatically propagate down to children; it must be placed on every mesh. Crossfading between different levels of detail is supported, using the standard 4x4 ordered dithering pattern from [1]. The shader code to compute the dithering patterns should be well-optimized. The dithering code is only active when visibility ranges are in use for the mesh in question, so that we don't lose early Z. Cascaded shadow maps show the HLOD level of the view they're associated with. Point light and spot light shadow maps, which have no CSMs, display all HLOD levels that are visible in any view. To support this efficiently and avoid doing visibility checks multiple times, we precalculate all visible HLOD levels for each entity with a `VisibilityRange` during the `check_visibility_range` system. A new example, `visibility_range`, has been added to the tree, as well as a new low-poly version of the flight helmet model to go with it. It demonstrates use of the visibility range feature to provide levels of detail. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_dithering#Threshold_map [^1]: Unreal doesn't have a feature that exactly corresponds to visibility ranges, but Unreal's HLOD system serves roughly the same purpose. ## Changelog ### Added * A new `VisibilityRange` component is available to conditionally enable entity visibility at camera distances, with optional crossfade support. This can be used to implement different levels of detail (LODs). ## Screenshots High-poly model:  Low-poly model up close:  Crossfading between the two:  --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
961b24deaf
|
Implement filmic color grading. (#13121)
This commit expands Bevy's existing tonemapping feature to a complete set of filmic color grading tools, matching those of engines like Unity, Unreal, and Godot. The following features are supported: * White point adjustment. This is inspired by Unity's implementation of the feature, but simplified and optimized. *Temperature* and *tint* control the adjustments to the *x* and *y* chromaticity values of [CIE 1931]. Following Unity, the adjustments are made relative to the [D65 standard illuminant] in the [LMS color space]. * Hue rotation. This simply converts the RGB value to [HSV], alters the hue, and converts back. * Color correction. This allows the *gamma*, *gain*, and *lift* values to be adjusted according to the standard [ASC CDL combined function]. * Separate color correction for shadows, midtones, and highlights. Blender's source code was used as a reference for the implementation of this. The midtone ranges can be adjusted by the user. To avoid abrupt color changes, a small crossfade is used between the different sections of the image, again following Blender's formulas. A new example, `color_grading`, has been added, offering a GUI to change all the color grading settings. It uses the same test scene as the existing `tonemapping` example, which has been factored out into a shared glTF scene. [CIE 1931]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIE_1931_color_space [D65 standard illuminant]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_illuminant#Illuminant_series_D [LMS color space]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LMS_color_space [HSV]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSL_and_HSV [ASC CDL combined function]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASC_CDL#Combined_Function ## Changelog ### Added * Many new filmic color grading options have been added to the `ColorGrading` component. ## Migration Guide * `ColorGrading::gamma` and `ColorGrading::pre_saturation` are now set separately for the `shadows`, `midtones`, and `highlights` sections. You can migrate code with the `ColorGrading::all_sections` and `ColorGrading::all_sections_mut` functions, which access and/or update all sections at once. * `ColorGrading::post_saturation` and `ColorGrading::exposure` are now fields of `ColorGrading::global`. ## Screenshots   |
||
![]() |
6d6810c90d
|
Meshlet continuous LOD (#12755)
Adds a basic level of detail system to meshlets. An extremely brief summary is as follows: * In `from_mesh.rs`, once we've built the first level of clusters, we group clusters, simplify the new mega-clusters, and then split the simplified groups back into regular sized clusters. Repeat several times (ideally until you can't anymore). This forms a directed acyclic graph (DAG), where the children are the meshlets from the previous level, and the parents are the more simplified versions of their children. The leaf nodes are meshlets formed from the original mesh. * In `cull_meshlets.wgsl`, each cluster selects whether to render or not based on the LOD bounding sphere (different than the culling bounding sphere) of the current meshlet, the LOD bounding sphere of its parent (the meshlet group from simplification), and the simplification error relative to its children of both the current meshlet and its parent meshlet. This kind of breaks two pass occlusion culling, which will be fixed in a future PR by using an HZB from the previous frame to get the initial list of occluders. Many, _many_ improvements to be done in the future https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/11518, not least of which is code quality and speed. I don't even expect this to work on many types of input meshes. This is just a basic implementation/draft for collaboration. Arguable how much we want to do in this PR, I'll leave that up to maintainers. I've erred on the side of "as basic as possible". References: * Slides 27-77 (video available on youtube) https://advances.realtimerendering.com/s2021/Karis_Nanite_SIGGRAPH_Advances_2021_final.pdf * https://blog.traverseresearch.nl/creating-a-directed-acyclic-graph-from-a-mesh-1329e57286e5 * https://jglrxavpok.github.io/2024/01/19/recreating-nanite-lod-generation.html, https://jglrxavpok.github.io/2024/03/12/recreating-nanite-faster-lod-generation.html, https://jglrxavpok.github.io/2024/04/02/recreating-nanite-runtime-lod-selection.html, and https://github.com/jglrxavpok/Carrot * https://github.com/gents83/INOX/tree/master/crates/plugins/binarizer/src * https://cs418.cs.illinois.edu/website/text/nanite.html   --------- Co-authored-by: Ricky Taylor <rickytaylor26@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: atlas dostal <rodol@rivalrebels.com> Co-authored-by: Patrick Walton <pcwalton@mimiga.net> |
||
![]() |
4f20faaa43
|
Meshlet rendering (initial feature) (#10164)
# Objective - Implements a more efficient, GPU-driven (https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/1342) rendering pipeline based on meshlets. - Meshes are split into small clusters of triangles called meshlets, each of which acts as a mini index buffer into the larger mesh data. Meshlets can be compressed, streamed, culled, and batched much more efficiently than monolithic meshes.   # Misc * Future work: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/11518 * Nanite reference: https://advances.realtimerendering.com/s2021/Karis_Nanite_SIGGRAPH_Advances_2021_final.pdf Two pass occlusion culling explained very well: https://medium.com/@mil_kru/two-pass-occlusion-culling-4100edcad501 --------- Co-authored-by: Ricky Taylor <rickytaylor26@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: vero <email@atlasdostal.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: atlas dostal <rodol@rivalrebels.com> |
||
![]() |
4c15dd0fc5
|
Implement irradiance volumes. (#10268)
# Objective Bevy could benefit from *irradiance volumes*, also known as *voxel global illumination* or simply as light probes (though this term is not preferred, as multiple techniques can be called light probes). Irradiance volumes are a form of baked global illumination; they work by sampling the light at the centers of each voxel within a cuboid. At runtime, the voxels surrounding the fragment center are sampled and interpolated to produce indirect diffuse illumination. ## Solution This is divided into two sections. The first is copied and pasted from the irradiance volume module documentation and describes the technique. The second part consists of notes on the implementation. ### Overview An *irradiance volume* is a cuboid voxel region consisting of regularly-spaced precomputed samples of diffuse indirect light. They're ideal if you have a dynamic object such as a character that can move about static non-moving geometry such as a level in a game, and you want that dynamic object to be affected by the light bouncing off that static geometry. To use irradiance volumes, you need to precompute, or *bake*, the indirect light in your scene. Bevy doesn't currently come with a way to do this. Fortunately, [Blender] provides a [baking tool] as part of the Eevee renderer, and its irradiance volumes are compatible with those used by Bevy. The [`bevy-baked-gi`] project provides a tool, `export-blender-gi`, that can extract the baked irradiance volumes from the Blender `.blend` file and package them up into a `.ktx2` texture for use by the engine. See the documentation in the `bevy-baked-gi` project for more details as to this workflow. Like all light probes in Bevy, irradiance volumes are 1×1×1 cubes that can be arbitrarily scaled, rotated, and positioned in a scene with the [`bevy_transform::components::Transform`] component. The 3D voxel grid will be stretched to fill the interior of the cube, and the illumination from the irradiance volume will apply to all fragments within that bounding region. Bevy's irradiance volumes are based on Valve's [*ambient cubes*] as used in *Half-Life 2* ([Mitchell 2006], slide 27). These encode a single color of light from the six 3D cardinal directions and blend the sides together according to the surface normal. The primary reason for choosing ambient cubes is to match Blender, so that its Eevee renderer can be used for baking. However, they also have some advantages over the common second-order spherical harmonics approach: ambient cubes don't suffer from ringing artifacts, they are smaller (6 colors for ambient cubes as opposed to 9 for spherical harmonics), and evaluation is faster. A smaller basis allows for a denser grid of voxels with the same storage requirements. If you wish to use a tool other than `export-blender-gi` to produce the irradiance volumes, you'll need to pack the irradiance volumes in the following format. The irradiance volume of resolution *(Rx, Ry, Rz)* is expected to be a 3D texture of dimensions *(Rx, 2Ry, 3Rz)*. The unnormalized texture coordinate *(s, t, p)* of the voxel at coordinate *(x, y, z)* with side *S* ∈ *{-X, +X, -Y, +Y, -Z, +Z}* is as follows: ```text s = x t = y + ⎰ 0 if S ∈ {-X, -Y, -Z} ⎱ Ry if S ∈ {+X, +Y, +Z} ⎧ 0 if S ∈ {-X, +X} p = z + ⎨ Rz if S ∈ {-Y, +Y} ⎩ 2Rz if S ∈ {-Z, +Z} ``` Visually, in a left-handed coordinate system with Y up, viewed from the right, the 3D texture looks like a stacked series of voxel grids, one for each cube side, in this order: | **+X** | **+Y** | **+Z** | | ------ | ------ | ------ | | **-X** | **-Y** | **-Z** | A terminology note: Other engines may refer to irradiance volumes as *voxel global illumination*, *VXGI*, or simply as *light probes*. Sometimes *light probe* refers to what Bevy calls a reflection probe. In Bevy, *light probe* is a generic term that encompasses all cuboid bounding regions that capture indirect illumination, whether based on voxels or not. Note that, if binding arrays aren't supported (e.g. on WebGPU or WebGL 2), then only the closest irradiance volume to the view will be taken into account during rendering. [*ambient cubes*]: https://advances.realtimerendering.com/s2006/Mitchell-ShadingInValvesSourceEngine.pdf [Mitchell 2006]: https://advances.realtimerendering.com/s2006/Mitchell-ShadingInValvesSourceEngine.pdf [Blender]: http://blender.org/ [baking tool]: https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/eevee/render_settings/indirect_lighting.html [`bevy-baked-gi`]: https://github.com/pcwalton/bevy-baked-gi ### Implementation notes This patch generalizes light probes so as to reuse as much code as possible between irradiance volumes and the existing reflection probes. This approach was chosen because both techniques share numerous similarities: 1. Both irradiance volumes and reflection probes are cuboid bounding regions. 2. Both are responsible for providing baked indirect light. 3. Both techniques involve presenting a variable number of textures to the shader from which indirect light is sampled. (In the current implementation, this uses binding arrays.) 4. Both irradiance volumes and reflection probes require gathering and sorting probes by distance on CPU. 5. Both techniques require the GPU to search through a list of bounding regions. 6. Both will eventually want to have falloff so that we can smoothly blend as objects enter and exit the probes' influence ranges. (This is not implemented yet to keep this patch relatively small and reviewable.) To do this, we generalize most of the methods in the reflection probes patch #11366 to be generic over a trait, `LightProbeComponent`. This trait is implemented by both `EnvironmentMapLight` (for reflection probes) and `IrradianceVolume` (for irradiance volumes). Using a trait will allow us to add more types of light probes in the future. In particular, I highly suspect we will want real-time reflection planes for mirrors in the future, which can be easily slotted into this framework. ## Changelog > This section is optional. If this was a trivial fix, or has no externally-visible impact, you can delete this section. ### Added * A new `IrradianceVolume` asset type is available for baked voxelized light probes. You can bake the global illumination using Blender or another tool of your choice and use it in Bevy to apply indirect illumination to dynamic objects. |
||
![]() |
83d6600267
|
Implement minimal reflection probes (fixed macOS, iOS, and Android). (#11366)
This pull request re-submits #10057, which was backed out for breaking macOS, iOS, and Android. I've tested this version on macOS and Android and on the iOS simulator. # Objective This pull request implements *reflection probes*, which generalize environment maps to allow for multiple environment maps in the same scene, each of which has an axis-aligned bounding box. This is a standard feature of physically-based renderers and was inspired by [the corresponding feature in Blender's Eevee renderer]. ## Solution This is a minimal implementation of reflection probes that allows artists to define cuboid bounding regions associated with environment maps. For every view, on every frame, a system builds up a list of the nearest 4 reflection probes that are within the view's frustum and supplies that list to the shader. The PBR fragment shader searches through the list, finds the first containing reflection probe, and uses it for indirect lighting, falling back to the view's environment map if none is found. Both forward and deferred renderers are fully supported. A reflection probe is an entity with a pair of components, *LightProbe* and *EnvironmentMapLight* (as well as the standard *SpatialBundle*, to position it in the world). The *LightProbe* component (along with the *Transform*) defines the bounding region, while the *EnvironmentMapLight* component specifies the associated diffuse and specular cubemaps. A frequent question is "why two components instead of just one?" The advantages of this setup are: 1. It's readily extensible to other types of light probes, in particular *irradiance volumes* (also known as ambient cubes or voxel global illumination), which use the same approach of bounding cuboids. With a single component that applies to both reflection probes and irradiance volumes, we can share the logic that implements falloff and blending between multiple light probes between both of those features. 2. It reduces duplication between the existing *EnvironmentMapLight* and these new reflection probes. Systems can treat environment maps attached to cameras the same way they treat environment maps applied to reflection probes if they wish. Internally, we gather up all environment maps in the scene and place them in a cubemap array. At present, this means that all environment maps must have the same size, mipmap count, and texture format. A warning is emitted if this restriction is violated. We could potentially relax this in the future as part of the automatic mipmap generation work, which could easily do texture format conversion as part of its preprocessing. An easy way to generate reflection probe cubemaps is to bake them in Blender and use the `export-blender-gi` tool that's part of the [`bevy-baked-gi`] project. This tool takes a `.blend` file containing baked cubemaps as input and exports cubemap images, pre-filtered with an embedded fork of the [glTF IBL Sampler], alongside a corresponding `.scn.ron` file that the scene spawner can use to recreate the reflection probes. Note that this is intentionally a minimal implementation, to aid reviewability. Known issues are: * Reflection probes are basically unsupported on WebGL 2, because WebGL 2 has no cubemap arrays. (Strictly speaking, you can have precisely one reflection probe in the scene if you have no other cubemaps anywhere, but this isn't very useful.) * Reflection probes have no falloff, so reflections will abruptly change when objects move from one bounding region to another. * As mentioned before, all cubemaps in the world of a given type (diffuse or specular) must have the same size, format, and mipmap count. Future work includes: * Blending between multiple reflection probes. * A falloff/fade-out region so that reflected objects disappear gradually instead of vanishing all at once. * Irradiance volumes for voxel-based global illumination. This should reuse much of the reflection probe logic, as they're both GI techniques based on cuboid bounding regions. * Support for WebGL 2, by breaking batches when reflection probes are used. These issues notwithstanding, I think it's best to land this with roughly the current set of functionality, because this patch is useful as is and adding everything above would make the pull request significantly larger and harder to review. --- ## Changelog ### Added * A new *LightProbe* component is available that specifies a bounding region that an *EnvironmentMapLight* applies to. The combination of a *LightProbe* and an *EnvironmentMapLight* offers *reflection probe* functionality similar to that available in other engines. [the corresponding feature in Blender's Eevee renderer]: https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/eevee/light_probes/reflection_cubemaps.html [`bevy-baked-gi`]: https://github.com/pcwalton/bevy-baked-gi [glTF IBL Sampler]: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-IBL-Sampler |
||
![]() |
3d996639a0
|
Revert "Implement minimal reflection probes. (#10057)" (#11307)
# Objective - Fix working on macOS, iOS, Android on main - Fixes #11281 - Fixes #11282 - Fixes #11283 - Fixes #11299 ## Solution - Revert #10057 |
||
![]() |
54a943d232
|
Implement minimal reflection probes. (#10057)
# Objective This pull request implements *reflection probes*, which generalize environment maps to allow for multiple environment maps in the same scene, each of which has an axis-aligned bounding box. This is a standard feature of physically-based renderers and was inspired by [the corresponding feature in Blender's Eevee renderer]. ## Solution This is a minimal implementation of reflection probes that allows artists to define cuboid bounding regions associated with environment maps. For every view, on every frame, a system builds up a list of the nearest 4 reflection probes that are within the view's frustum and supplies that list to the shader. The PBR fragment shader searches through the list, finds the first containing reflection probe, and uses it for indirect lighting, falling back to the view's environment map if none is found. Both forward and deferred renderers are fully supported. A reflection probe is an entity with a pair of components, *LightProbe* and *EnvironmentMapLight* (as well as the standard *SpatialBundle*, to position it in the world). The *LightProbe* component (along with the *Transform*) defines the bounding region, while the *EnvironmentMapLight* component specifies the associated diffuse and specular cubemaps. A frequent question is "why two components instead of just one?" The advantages of this setup are: 1. It's readily extensible to other types of light probes, in particular *irradiance volumes* (also known as ambient cubes or voxel global illumination), which use the same approach of bounding cuboids. With a single component that applies to both reflection probes and irradiance volumes, we can share the logic that implements falloff and blending between multiple light probes between both of those features. 2. It reduces duplication between the existing *EnvironmentMapLight* and these new reflection probes. Systems can treat environment maps attached to cameras the same way they treat environment maps applied to reflection probes if they wish. Internally, we gather up all environment maps in the scene and place them in a cubemap array. At present, this means that all environment maps must have the same size, mipmap count, and texture format. A warning is emitted if this restriction is violated. We could potentially relax this in the future as part of the automatic mipmap generation work, which could easily do texture format conversion as part of its preprocessing. An easy way to generate reflection probe cubemaps is to bake them in Blender and use the `export-blender-gi` tool that's part of the [`bevy-baked-gi`] project. This tool takes a `.blend` file containing baked cubemaps as input and exports cubemap images, pre-filtered with an embedded fork of the [glTF IBL Sampler], alongside a corresponding `.scn.ron` file that the scene spawner can use to recreate the reflection probes. Note that this is intentionally a minimal implementation, to aid reviewability. Known issues are: * Reflection probes are basically unsupported on WebGL 2, because WebGL 2 has no cubemap arrays. (Strictly speaking, you can have precisely one reflection probe in the scene if you have no other cubemaps anywhere, but this isn't very useful.) * Reflection probes have no falloff, so reflections will abruptly change when objects move from one bounding region to another. * As mentioned before, all cubemaps in the world of a given type (diffuse or specular) must have the same size, format, and mipmap count. Future work includes: * Blending between multiple reflection probes. * A falloff/fade-out region so that reflected objects disappear gradually instead of vanishing all at once. * Irradiance volumes for voxel-based global illumination. This should reuse much of the reflection probe logic, as they're both GI techniques based on cuboid bounding regions. * Support for WebGL 2, by breaking batches when reflection probes are used. These issues notwithstanding, I think it's best to land this with roughly the current set of functionality, because this patch is useful as is and adding everything above would make the pull request significantly larger and harder to review. --- ## Changelog ### Added * A new *LightProbe* component is available that specifies a bounding region that an *EnvironmentMapLight* applies to. The combination of a *LightProbe* and an *EnvironmentMapLight* offers *reflection probe* functionality similar to that available in other engines. [the corresponding feature in Blender's Eevee renderer]: https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/eevee/light_probes/reflection_cubemaps.html [`bevy-baked-gi`]: https://github.com/pcwalton/bevy-baked-gi [glTF IBL Sampler]: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-IBL-Sampler |
||
![]() |
dd14f3a477
|
Implement lightmaps. (#10231)
 # Objective Lightmaps, textures that store baked global illumination, have been a mainstay of real-time graphics for decades. Bevy currently has no support for them, so this pull request implements them. ## Solution The new `Lightmap` component can be attached to any entity that contains a `Handle<Mesh>` and a `StandardMaterial`. When present, it will be applied in the PBR shader. Because multiple lightmaps are frequently packed into atlases, each lightmap may have its own UV boundaries within its texture. An `exposure` field is also provided, to control the brightness of the lightmap. Note that this PR doesn't provide any way to bake the lightmaps. That can be done with [The Lightmapper] or another solution, such as Unity's Bakery. --- ## Changelog ### Added * A new component, `Lightmap`, is available, for baked global illumination. If your mesh has a second UV channel (UV1), and you attach this component to the entity with that mesh, Bevy will apply the texture referenced in the lightmap. [The Lightmapper]: https://github.com/Naxela/The_Lightmapper --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
857fb9c724
|
Remove monkey.gltf (#9974)
# Objective - Fixes #9967 ## Solution - Remove `monkey.gltf` - Added `torus.gltf`, which is two torus meshes joined together, to replace `monkey.gltf` in the examples ## Examples I made `torus.gltf` mainly so that the multiple_windows example clearly shows the different camera angles ### asset_loading  ### hot_asset_reloading  ### multiple_windows:   |
||
![]() |
c6170d48f9
|
Add morph targets (#8158)
# Objective - Add morph targets to `bevy_pbr` (closes #5756) & load them from glTF - Supersedes #3722 - Fixes #6814 [Morph targets][1] (also known as shape interpolation, shape keys, or blend shapes) allow animating individual vertices with fine grained controls. This is typically used for facial expressions. By specifying multiple poses as vertex offset, and providing a set of weight of each pose, it is possible to define surprisingly realistic transitions between poses. Blending between multiple poses also allow composition. Morph targets are part of the [gltf standard][2] and are a feature of Unity and Unreal, and babylone.js, it is only natural to implement them in bevy. ## Solution This implementation of morph targets uses a 3d texture where each pixel is a component of an animated attribute. Each layer is a different target. We use a 2d texture for each target, because the number of attribute×components×animated vertices is expected to always exceed the maximum pixel row size limit of webGL2. It copies fairly closely the way skinning is implemented on the CPU side, while on the GPU side, the shader morph target implementation is a relatively trivial detail. We add an optional `morph_texture` to the `Mesh` struct. The `morph_texture` is built through a method that accepts an iterator over attribute buffers. The `MorphWeights` component, user-accessible, controls the blend of poses used by mesh instances (so that multiple copy of the same mesh may have different weights), all the weights are uploaded to a uniform buffer of 256 `f32`. We limit to 16 poses per mesh, and a total of 256 poses. More literature: * Old babylone.js implementation (vertex attribute-based): https://www.eternalcoding.com/dev-log-1-morph-targets/ * Babylone.js implementation (similar to ours): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBPRmGgU0PE * GPU gems 3: https://developer.nvidia.com/gpugems/gpugems3/part-i-geometry/chapter-3-directx-10-blend-shapes-breaking-limits * Development discord thread https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1083325980615114772 https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26321040/231181046-3bca2ab2-d4d9-472e-8098-639f1871ce2e.mp4 https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/26321040/d2a0c544-0ef8-45cf-9f99-8c3792f5a258 ## Acknowledgements * Thanks to `storytold` for sponsoring the feature * Thanks to `superdump` and `james7132` for guidance and help figuring out stuff ## Future work - Handling of less and more attributes (eg: animated uv, animated arbitrary attributes) - Dynamic pose allocation (so that zero-weighted poses aren't uploaded to GPU for example, enables much more total poses) - Better animation API, see #8357 ---- ## Changelog - Add morph targets to bevy meshes - Support up to 64 poses per mesh of individually up to 116508 vertices, animation currently strictly limited to the position, normal and tangent attributes. - Load a morph target using `Mesh::set_morph_targets` - Add `VisitMorphTargets` and `VisitMorphAttributes` traits to `bevy_render`, this allows defining morph targets (a fairly complex and nested data structure) through iterators (ie: single copy instead of passing around buffers), see documentation of those traits for details - Add `MorphWeights` component exported by `bevy_render` - `MorphWeights` control mesh's morph target weights, blending between various poses defined as morph targets. - `MorphWeights` are directly inherited by direct children (single level of hierarchy) of an entity. This allows controlling several mesh primitives through a unique entity _as per GLTF spec_. - Add `MorphTargetNames` component, naming each indices of loaded morph targets. - Load morph targets weights and buffers in `bevy_gltf` - handle morph targets animations in `bevy_animation` (previously, it was a `warn!` log) - Add the `MorphStressTest.gltf` asset for morph targets testing, taken from the glTF samples repo, CC0. - Add morph target manipulation to `scene_viewer` - Separate the animation code in `scene_viewer` from the rest of the code, reducing `#[cfg(feature)]` noise - Add the `morph_targets.rs` example to show off how to manipulate morph targets, loading `MorpStressTest.gltf` ## Migration Guide - (very specialized, unlikely to be touched by 3rd parties) - `MeshPipeline` now has a single `mesh_layouts` field rather than separate `mesh_layout` and `skinned_mesh_layout` fields. You should handle all possible mesh bind group layouts in your implementation - You should also handle properly the new `MORPH_TARGETS` shader def and mesh pipeline key. A new function is exposed to make this easier: `setup_moprh_and_skinning_defs` - The `MeshBindGroup` is now `MeshBindGroups`, cached bind groups are now accessed through the `get` method. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morph_target_animation [2]: https://registry.khronos.org/glTF/specs/2.0/glTF-2.0.html#morph-targets --------- Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
d74533b407
|
Add support for custom glTF vertex attributes. (#5370)
# Objective The objective is to be able to load data from "application-specific" (see glTF spec 3.7.2.1.) vertex attribute semantics from glTF files into Bevy meshes. ## Solution Rather than probe the glTF for the specific attributes supported by Bevy, this PR changes the loader to iterate through all the attributes and map them onto `MeshVertexAttribute`s. This mapping includes all the previously supported attributes, plus it is now possible to add mappings using the `add_custom_vertex_attribute()` method on `GltfPlugin`. ## Changelog - Add support for loading custom vertex attributes from glTF files. - Add the `custom_gltf_vertex_attribute.rs` example to illustrate loading custom vertex attributes. ## Migration Guide - If you were instantiating `GltfPlugin` using the unit-like struct syntax, you must instead use `GltfPlugin::default()` as the type is no longer unit-like. |
||
![]() |
1a96d820fd |
Add Distance and Atmospheric Fog support (#6412)
<img width="1392" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/418473/203873533-44c029af-13b7-4740-8ea3-af96bd5867c9.png"> <img width="1392" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/418473/203873549-36be7a23-b341-42a2-8a9f-ceea8ac7a2b8.png"> # Objective - Add support for the “classic” distance fog effect, as well as a more advanced atmospheric fog effect. ## Solution This PR: - Introduces a new `FogSettings` component that controls distance fog per-camera. - Adds support for three widely used “traditional” fog falloff modes: `Linear`, `Exponential` and `ExponentialSquared`, as well as a more advanced `Atmospheric` fog; - Adds support for directional light influence over fog color; - Extracts fog via `ExtractComponent`, then uses a prepare system that sets up a new dynamic uniform struct (`Fog`), similar to other mesh view types; - Renders fog in PBR material shader, as a final adjustment to the `output_color`, after PBR is computed (but before tone mapping); - Adds a new `StandardMaterial` flag to enable fog; (`fog_enabled`) - Adds convenience methods for easier artistic control when creating non-linear fog types; - Adds documentation around fog. --- ## Changelog ### Added - Added support for distance-based fog effects for PBR materials, controllable per-camera via the new `FogSettings` component; - Added `FogFalloff` enum for selecting between three widely used “traditional” fog falloff modes: `Linear`, `Exponential` and `ExponentialSquared`, as well as a more advanced `Atmospheric` fog; |
||
![]() |
449a1d223c |
animation player (#4375)
# Objective - Add a basic animation player - Single track - Not generic, can only animate `Transform`s - With plenty of possible optimisations available - Close-ish to https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/49 - https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/774027865020039209/958820063148929064 ## Solution - Can play animations - looping or not - Can pause animations - Can seek in animation - Can alter speed of animation - I also removed the previous gltf animation example https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8672791/161051887-e79283f0-9803-448a-93d0-5f7a62acb02d.mp4 |
||
![]() |
31bd4ecbbc |
Mesh Skinning. Attempt #3 (#4238)
# Objective Load skeletal weights and indices from GLTF files. Animate meshes. ## Solution - Load skeletal weights and indices from GLTF files. - Added `SkinnedMesh` component and ` SkinnedMeshInverseBindPose` asset - Added `extract_skinned_meshes` to extract joint matrices. - Added queue phase systems for enqueuing the buffer writes. Some notes: - This ports part of # #2359 to the current main. - This generates new `BufferVec`s and bind groups every frame. The expectation here is that the number of `Query::get` calls during extract is probably going to be the stronger bottleneck, with up to 256 calls per skinned mesh. Until that is optimized, caching buffers and bind groups is probably a non-concern. - Unfortunately, due to the uniform size requirements, this means a 16KB buffer is allocated for every skinned mesh every frame. There's probably a few ways to get around this, but most of them require either compute shaders or storage buffers, which are both incompatible with WebGL2. Co-authored-by: james7132 <contact@jamessliu.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: James Liu <contact@jamessliu.com> |
||
![]() |
fbe7a49d5b |
Gltf animations (#3751)
# Objective - Load informations for animations from GLTF - Make experimenting on animations easier # Non Objective - Implement a solutions for all animations in Bevy. This would need a discussion / RFC. The goal here is only to have the information available to try different APIs ## Solution - Load animations with a representation close to the GLTF spec - Add an example to display animations. There is an animation driver in the example, not in Bevy code, to show how it can be used. The example is cycling between examples from the official gltf sample ([AnimatedTriangle](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-Sample-Models/tree/master/2.0/AnimatedTriangle), [BoxAnimated](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-Sample-Models/tree/master/2.0/BoxAnimated)), and one from me with some cases not present in the official examples. https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8672791/150696656-073403f0-d921-43b6-beaf-099c7aee16ed.mp4 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
3e8e6c5671 |
add an example using UI & states to create a game menu (#2960)
adds an example using UI for something more related to a game than the current UI examples. Example with a game menu: * new game - will display settings for 5 seconds before returning to menu * preferences - can modify the settings, with two sub menus * quit - will quit the game I wanted a more complex UI example before starting the UI rewrite to have ground for comparison Co-authored-by: François <8672791+mockersf@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
![]() |
c9f19d8663 |
Cleanup of Markdown Files and add CI Checking (#1463)
I have run the VSCode Extension [markdownlint](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=DavidAnson.vscode-markdownlint) on all Markdown Files in the Repo. The provided Rules are documented here: https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.23.1/doc/Rules.md Rules I didn't follow/fix: * MD024/no-duplicate-heading * Changelog: Here Heading will always repeat. * Examples Readme: Platform-specific documentation should be symmetrical. * MD025/single-title * MD026/no-trailing-punctuation * Caused by the ! in "Hello, World!". * MD033/no-inline-html * The plugins_guidlines file does need HTML, so the shown badges aren't downscaled too much. * ~~MD036/no-emphasis-as-heading:~~ * ~~This Warning only Appears in the Github Issue Templates and can be ignored.~~ * ~~MD041/first-line-heading~~ * ~~Only appears in the Readme for the AlienCake example Assets, which is unimportant.~~ --- I also sorted the Examples in the Readme and Cargo.toml in this order/Priority: * Topic/Folder * Introductionary Examples * Alphabetical Order The explanation for each case, where it isn't Alphabetical : * Diagnostics * log_diagnostics: The usage of inbuild Diagnostics is more important than creating your own. * ECS (Entity Component System) * ecs_guide: The guide should be read, before diving into other Features. * Reflection * reflection: Basic Explanation should be read, before more advanced Topics. * WASM Examples * hello_wasm: It's "Hello, World!". |
||
![]() |
8c33da0051
|
3d game example (#1252)
3d game example |
||
![]() |
c32e637384
|
Asset system rework and GLTF scene loading (#693) | ||
![]() |
9aff0bcc2a
|
Add support for binary glTF (.glb) (#271)
Add support for binary glTF (.glb) |
||
![]() |
75429f4639 | render: use left-handed coordinate system and y-up | ||
![]() |
870f715df3 | Hot asset reloading | ||
![]() |
8a61ef48d3 | use relative paths for assets | ||
![]() |
7b79b3de8d | organize examples and add ecs guide |