custom
21 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
ff1143ec87
|
Remove deprecated component_reads_and_writes (#16348)
# Objective - Fixes #16339 ## Solution - Replaced `component_reads_and_writes` and `component_writes` with `try_iter_component_access`. ## Testing - Ran `dynamic` example to confirm behaviour is unchanged. - CI --- ## Migration Guide The following methods (some removed in previous PRs) are now replaced by `Access::try_iter_component_access`: * `Access::component_reads_and_writes` * `Access::component_reads` * `Access::component_writes` As `try_iter_component_access` returns a `Result`, you'll now need to handle the failing case (e.g., `unwrap()`). There is currently a single failure mode, `UnboundedAccess`, which occurs when the `Access` is for all `Components` _except_ certain exclusions. Since this list is infinite, there is no meaningful way for `Access` to provide an iterator. Instead, get a list of components (e.g., from the `Components` structure) and iterate over that instead, filtering using `Access::has_component_read`, `Access::has_component_write`, etc. Additionally, you'll need to `filter_map` the accesses based on which method you're attempting to replace: * `Access::component_reads_and_writes` -> `Exclusive(_) | Shared(_)` * `Access::component_reads` -> `Shared(_)` * `Access::component_writes` -> `Exclusive(_)` To ease migration, please consider the below extension trait which you can include in your project: ```rust pub trait AccessCompatibilityExt { /// Returns the indices of the components this has access to. fn component_reads_and_writes(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_; /// Returns the indices of the components this has non-exclusive access to. fn component_reads(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_; /// Returns the indices of the components this has exclusive access to. fn component_writes(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_; } impl<T: SparseSetIndex> AccessCompatibilityExt for Access<T> { fn component_reads_and_writes(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_ { self .try_iter_component_access() .expect("Access is unbounded. Please refactor the usage of this method to directly use try_iter_component_access") .filter_map(|component_access| { let index = component_access.index().sparse_set_index(); match component_access { ComponentAccessKind::Archetypal(_) => None, ComponentAccessKind::Shared(_) => Some(index), ComponentAccessKind::Exclusive(_) => Some(index), } }) } fn component_reads(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_ { self .try_iter_component_access() .expect("Access is unbounded. Please refactor the usage of this method to directly use try_iter_component_access") .filter_map(|component_access| { let index = component_access.index().sparse_set_index(); match component_access { ComponentAccessKind::Archetypal(_) => None, ComponentAccessKind::Shared(_) => Some(index), ComponentAccessKind::Exclusive(_) => None, } }) } fn component_writes(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_ { self .try_iter_component_access() .expect("Access is unbounded. Please refactor the usage of this method to directly use try_iter_component_access") .filter_map(|component_access| { let index = component_access.index().sparse_set_index(); match component_access { ComponentAccessKind::Archetypal(_) => None, ComponentAccessKind::Shared(_) => None, ComponentAccessKind::Exclusive(_) => Some(index), } }) } } ``` Please take note of the use of `expect(...)` in these methods. You should consider using these as a starting point for a more appropriate migration based on your specific needs. ## Notes - This new method is fallible based on whether the `Access` is bounded or unbounded (unbounded occurring with inverted component sets). If bounded, will return an iterator of every item and its access level. I believe this makes sense without exposing implementation details around `Access`. - The access level is defined by an `enum` `ComponentAccessKind<T>`, either `Archetypical`, `Shared`, or `Exclusive`. As a convenience, this `enum` has a method `index` to get the inner `T` value without a match statement. It does add more code, but the API is clearer. - Within `QueryBuilder` this new method simplifies several pieces of logic without changing behaviour. - Within `QueryState` the logic is simplified and the amount of iteration is reduced, potentially improving performance. - Within the `dynamic` example it has identical behaviour, with the inversion footgun explicitly highlighted by an `unwrap`. --------- Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Mike <2180432+hymm@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
![]() |
3c8fae2390
|
Improved Entity Mapping and Cloning (#17687)
Fixes #17535 Bevy's approach to handling "entity mapping" during spawning and cloning needs some work. The addition of [Relations](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/17398) both [introduced a new "duplicate entities" bug when spawning scenes in the scene system](#17535) and made the weaknesses of the current mapping system exceedingly clear: 1. Entity mapping requires _a ton_ of boilerplate (implement or derive VisitEntities and VisitEntitesMut, then register / reflect MapEntities). Knowing the incantation is challenging and if you forget to do it in part or in whole, spawning subtly breaks. 2. Entity mapping a spawned component in scenes incurs unnecessary overhead: look up ReflectMapEntities, create a _brand new temporary instance_ of the component using FromReflect, map the entities in that instance, and then apply that on top of the actual component using reflection. We can do much better. Additionally, while our new [Entity cloning system](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/16132) is already pretty great, it has some areas we can make better: * It doesn't expose semantic info about the clone (ex: ignore or "clone empty"), meaning we can't key off of that in places where it would be useful, such as scene spawning. Rather than duplicating this info across contexts, I think it makes more sense to add that info to the clone system, especially given that we'd like to use cloning code in some of our spawning scenarios. * EntityCloner is currently built in a way that prioritizes a single entity clone * EntityCloner's recursive cloning is built to be done "inside out" in a parallel context (queue commands that each have a clone of EntityCloner). By making EntityCloner the orchestrator of the clone we can remove internal arcs, improve the clarity of the code, make EntityCloner mutable again, and simplify the builder code. * EntityCloner does not currently take into account entity mapping. This is necessary to do true "bullet proof" cloning, would allow us to unify the per-component scene spawning and cloning UX, and ultimately would allow us to use EntityCloner in place of raw reflection for scenes like `Scene(World)` (which would give us a nice performance boost: fewer archetype moves, less reflection overhead). ## Solution ### Improved Entity Mapping First, components now have first-class "entity visiting and mapping" behavior: ```rust #[derive(Component, Reflect)] #[reflect(Component)] struct Inventory { size: usize, #[entities] items: Vec<Entity>, } ``` Any field with the `#[entities]` annotation will be viewable and mappable when cloning and spawning scenes. Compare that to what was required before! ```rust #[derive(Component, Reflect, VisitEntities, VisitEntitiesMut)] #[reflect(Component, MapEntities)] struct Inventory { #[visit_entities(ignore)] size: usize, items: Vec<Entity>, } ``` Additionally, for relationships `#[entities]` is implied, meaning this "just works" in scenes and cloning: ```rust #[derive(Component, Reflect)] #[relationship(relationship_target = Children)] #[reflect(Component)] struct ChildOf(pub Entity); ``` Note that Component _does not_ implement `VisitEntities` directly. Instead, it has `Component::visit_entities` and `Component::visit_entities_mut` methods. This is for a few reasons: 1. We cannot implement `VisitEntities for C: Component` because that would conflict with our impl of VisitEntities for anything that implements `IntoIterator<Item=Entity>`. Preserving that impl is more important from a UX perspective. 2. We should not implement `Component: VisitEntities` VisitEntities in the Component derive, as that would increase the burden of manual Component trait implementors. 3. Making VisitEntitiesMut directly callable for components would make it easy to invalidate invariants defined by a component author. By putting it in the `Component` impl, we can make it harder to call naturally / unavailable to autocomplete using `fn visit_entities_mut(this: &mut Self, ...)`. `ReflectComponent::apply_or_insert` is now `ReflectComponent::apply_or_insert_mapped`. By moving mapping inside this impl, we remove the need to go through the reflection system to do entity mapping, meaning we no longer need to create a clone of the target component, map the entities in that component, and patch those values on top. This will make spawning mapped entities _much_ faster (The default `Component::visit_entities_mut` impl is an inlined empty function, so it will incur no overhead for unmapped entities). ### The Bug Fix To solve #17535, spawning code now skips entities with the new `ComponentCloneBehavior::Ignore` and `ComponentCloneBehavior::RelationshipTarget` variants (note RelationshipTarget is a temporary "workaround" variant that allows scenes to skip these components. This is a temporary workaround that can be removed as these cases should _really_ be using EntityCloner logic, which should be done in a followup PR. When that is done, `ComponentCloneBehavior::RelationshipTarget` can be merged into the normal `ComponentCloneBehavior::Custom`). ### Improved Cloning * `Option<ComponentCloneHandler>` has been replaced by `ComponentCloneBehavior`, which encodes additional intent and context (ex: `Default`, `Ignore`, `Custom`, `RelationshipTarget` (this last one is temporary)). * Global per-world entity cloning configuration has been removed. This felt overly complicated, increased our API surface, and felt too generic. Each clone context can have different requirements (ex: what a user wants in a specific system, what a scene spawner wants, etc). I'd prefer to see how far context-specific EntityCloners get us first. * EntityCloner's internals have been reworked to remove Arcs and make it mutable. * EntityCloner is now directly stored on EntityClonerBuilder, simplifying the code somewhat * EntityCloner's "bundle scratch" pattern has been moved into the new BundleScratch type, improving its usability and making it usable in other contexts (such as future cross-world cloning code). Currently this is still private, but with some higher level safe APIs it could be used externally for making dynamic bundles * EntityCloner's recursive cloning behavior has been "externalized". It is now responsible for orchestrating recursive clones, meaning it no longer needs to be sharable/clone-able across threads / read-only. * EntityCloner now does entity mapping during clones, like scenes do. This gives behavior parity and also makes it more generically useful. * `RelatonshipTarget::RECURSIVE_SPAWN` is now `RelationshipTarget::LINKED_SPAWN`, and this field is used when cloning relationship targets to determine if cloning should happen recursively. The new `LINKED_SPAWN` term was picked to make it more generically applicable across spawning and cloning scenarios. ## Next Steps * I think we should adapt EntityCloner to support cross world cloning. I think this PR helps set the stage for that by making the internals slightly more generalized. We could have a CrossWorldEntityCloner that reuses a lot of this infrastructure. * Once we support cross world cloning, we should use EntityCloner to spawn `Scene(World)` scenes. This would yield significant performance benefits (no archetype moves, less reflection overhead). --------- Co-authored-by: eugineerd <70062110+eugineerd@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
26bb0b40d2
|
Move #![warn(clippy::allow_attributes, clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason)] to the workspace Cargo.toml (#17374)
# Objective Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111 ## Solution Move `#![warn(clippy::allow_attributes, clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason)]` to the workspace `Cargo.toml` ## Testing Lots of CI testing, and local testing too. --------- Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com> |
||
![]() |
7112d5594e
|
Remove all deprecated code (#16338)
# Objective Release cycle things ## Solution Delete items deprecated in 0.15 and migrate bevy itself. ## Testing CI |
||
![]() |
64efd08e13
|
Prefer Display over Debug (#16112)
# Objective Fixes #16104 ## Solution I removed all instances of `:?` and put them back one by one where it caused an error. I removed some bevy_utils helper functions that were only used in 2 places and don't add value. See: #11478 ## Testing CI should catch the mistakes ## Migration Guide `bevy::utils::{dbg,info,warn,error}` were removed. Use `bevy::utils::tracing::{debug,info,warn,error}` instead. --------- Co-authored-by: SpecificProtagonist <vincentjunge@posteo.net> |
||
![]() |
711246aa34
|
Update hashbrown to 0.15 (#15801)
Updating dependencies; adopted version of #15696. (Supercedes #15696.) Long answer: hashbrown is no longer using ahash by default, meaning that we can't use the default-hasher methods with ahasher. So, we have to use the longer-winded versions instead. This takes the opportunity to also switch our default hasher as well, but without actually enabling the default-hasher feature for hashbrown, meaning that we'll be able to change our hasher more easily at the cost of all of these method calls being obnoxious forever. One large change from 0.15 is that `insert_unique_unchecked` is now `unsafe`, and for cases where unsafe code was denied at the crate level, I replaced it with `insert`. ## Migration Guide `bevy_utils` has updated its version of `hashbrown` to 0.15 and now defaults to `foldhash` instead of `ahash`. This means that if you've hard-coded your hasher to `bevy_utils::AHasher` or separately used the `ahash` crate in your code, you may need to switch to `foldhash` to ensure that everything works like it does in Bevy. |
||
![]() |
a35811d088
|
Add Immutable Component Support (#16372)
# Objective - Fixes #16208 ## Solution - Added an associated type to `Component`, `Mutability`, which flags whether a component is mutable, or immutable. If `Mutability= Mutable`, the component is mutable. If `Mutability= Immutable`, the component is immutable. - Updated `derive_component` to default to mutable unless an `#[component(immutable)]` attribute is added. - Updated `ReflectComponent` to check if a component is mutable and, if not, panic when attempting to mutate. ## Testing - CI - `immutable_components` example. --- ## Showcase Users can now mark a component as `#[component(immutable)]` to prevent safe mutation of a component while it is attached to an entity: ```rust #[derive(Component)] #[component(immutable)] struct Foo { // ... } ``` This prevents creating an exclusive reference to the component while it is attached to an entity. This is particularly powerful when combined with component hooks, as you can now fully track a component's value, ensuring whatever invariants you desire are upheld. Before this would be done my making a component private, and manually creating a `QueryData` implementation which only permitted read access. <details> <summary>Using immutable components as an index</summary> ```rust /// This is an example of a component like [`Name`](bevy::prelude::Name), but immutable. #[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash, Component)] #[component( immutable, on_insert = on_insert_name, on_replace = on_replace_name, )] pub struct Name(pub &'static str); /// This index allows for O(1) lookups of an [`Entity`] by its [`Name`]. #[derive(Resource, Default)] struct NameIndex { name_to_entity: HashMap<Name, Entity>, } impl NameIndex { fn get_entity(&self, name: &'static str) -> Option<Entity> { self.name_to_entity.get(&Name(name)).copied() } } fn on_insert_name(mut world: DeferredWorld<'_>, entity: Entity, _component: ComponentId) { let Some(&name) = world.entity(entity).get::<Name>() else { unreachable!() }; let Some(mut index) = world.get_resource_mut::<NameIndex>() else { return; }; index.name_to_entity.insert(name, entity); } fn on_replace_name(mut world: DeferredWorld<'_>, entity: Entity, _component: ComponentId) { let Some(&name) = world.entity(entity).get::<Name>() else { unreachable!() }; let Some(mut index) = world.get_resource_mut::<NameIndex>() else { return; }; index.name_to_entity.remove(&name); } // Setup our name index world.init_resource::<NameIndex>(); // Spawn some entities! let alyssa = world.spawn(Name("Alyssa")).id(); let javier = world.spawn(Name("Javier")).id(); // Check our index let index = world.resource::<NameIndex>(); assert_eq!(index.get_entity("Alyssa"), Some(alyssa)); assert_eq!(index.get_entity("Javier"), Some(javier)); // Changing the name of an entity is also fully capture by our index world.entity_mut(javier).insert(Name("Steven")); // Javier changed their name to Steven let steven = javier; // Check our index let index = world.resource::<NameIndex>(); assert_eq!(index.get_entity("Javier"), None); assert_eq!(index.get_entity("Steven"), Some(steven)); ``` </details> Additionally, users can use `Component<Mutability = ...>` in trait bounds to enforce that a component _is_ mutable or _is_ immutable. When using `Component` as a trait bound without specifying `Mutability`, any component is applicable. However, methods which only work on mutable or immutable components are unavailable, since the compiler must be pessimistic about the type. ## Migration Guide - When implementing `Component` manually, you must now provide a type for `Mutability`. The type `Mutable` provides equivalent behaviour to earlier versions of `Component`: ```rust impl Component for Foo { type Mutability = Mutable; // ... } ``` - When working with generic components, you may need to specify that your generic parameter implements `Component<Mutability = Mutable>` rather than `Component` if you require mutable access to said component. - The entity entry API has had to have some changes made to minimise friction when working with immutable components. Methods which previously returned a `Mut<T>` will now typically return an `OccupiedEntry<T>` instead, requiring you to add an `into_mut()` to get the `Mut<T>` item again. ## Draft Release Notes Components can now be made immutable while stored within the ECS. Components are the fundamental unit of data within an ECS, and Bevy provides a number of ways to work with them that align with Rust's rules around ownership and borrowing. One part of this is hooks, which allow for defining custom behavior at key points in a component's lifecycle, such as addition and removal. However, there is currently no way to respond to _mutation_ of a component using hooks. The reasons for this are quite technical, but to summarize, their addition poses a significant challenge to Bevy's core promises around performance. Without mutation hooks, it's relatively trivial to modify a component in such a way that breaks invariants it intends to uphold. For example, you can use `core::mem::swap` to swap the components of two entities, bypassing the insertion and removal hooks. This means the only way to react to this modification is via change detection in a system, which then begs the question of what happens _between_ that alteration and the next run of that system? Alternatively, you could make your component private to prevent mutation, but now you need to provide commands and a custom `QueryData` implementation to allow users to interact with your component at all. Immutable components solve this problem by preventing the creation of an exclusive reference to the component entirely. Without an exclusive reference, the only way to modify an immutable component is via removal or replacement, which is fully captured by component hooks. To make a component immutable, simply add `#[component(immutable)]`: ```rust #[derive(Component)] #[component(immutable)] struct Foo { // ... } ``` When implementing `Component` manually, there is an associated type `Mutability` which controls this behavior: ```rust impl Component for Foo { type Mutability = Mutable; // ... } ``` Note that this means when working with generic components, you may need to specify that a component is mutable to gain access to certain methods: ```rust // Before fn bar<C: Component>() { // ... } // After fn bar<C: Component<Mutability = Mutable>>() { // ... } ``` With this new tool, creating index components, or caching data on an entity should be more user friendly, allowing libraries to provide APIs relying on components and hooks to uphold their invariants. ## Notes - ~~I've done my best to implement this feature, but I'm not happy with how reflection has turned out. If any reflection SMEs know a way to improve this situation I'd greatly appreciate it.~~ There is an outstanding issue around the fallibility of mutable methods on `ReflectComponent`, but the DX is largely unchanged from `main` now. - I've attempted to prevent all safe mutable access to a component that does not implement `Component<Mutability = Mutable>`, but there may still be some methods I have missed. Please indicate so and I will address them, as they are bugs. - Unsafe is an escape hatch I am _not_ attempting to prevent. Whatever you do with unsafe is between you and your compiler. - I am marking this PR as ready, but I suspect it will undergo fairly major revisions based on SME feedback. - I've marked this PR as _Uncontroversial_ based on the feature, not the implementation. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@iki.fi> |
||
![]() |
35d10866b8
|
Rename init_component & friends (#15454)
# Objective - Fixes #15451 ## Migration Guide - `World::init_component` has been renamed to `register_component`. - `World::init_component_with_descriptor` has been renamed to `register_component_with_descriptor`. - `World::init_bundle` has been renamed to `register_bundle`. - `Components::init_component` has been renamed to `register_component`. - `Components::init_component_with_descriptor` has been renamed to `register_component_with_descriptor`. - `Components::init_resource` has been renamed to `register_resource`. - `Components::init_non_send` had been renamed to `register_non_send`. |
||
![]() |
efda7f3f9c
|
Simpler lint fixes: makes ci lints work but disables a lint for now (#15376)
Takes the first two commits from #15375 and adds suggestions from this comment: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15375#issuecomment-2366968300 See #15375 for more reasoning/motivation. ## Rebasing (rerunning) ```rust git switch simpler-lint-fixes git reset --hard main cargo fmt --all -- --unstable-features --config normalize_comments=true,imports_granularity=Crate cargo fmt --all git add --update git commit --message "rustfmt" cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix cargo fmt --all -- --unstable-features --config normalize_comments=true,imports_granularity=Crate cargo fmt --all git add --update git commit --message "clippy" git cherry-pick e6c0b94f6795222310fb812fa5c4512661fc7887 ``` |
||
![]() |
1b8c1c1242
|
simplify std::mem references (#15315)
# Objective - Fixes #15314 ## Solution - Remove unnecessary usings and simplify references to those functions. ## Testing CI |
||
![]() |
3c41586154
|
Add EntityRefExcept and EntityMutExcept world queries, in preparation for generalized animation. (#15207)
This commit adds two new `WorldQuery` types: `EntityRefExcept` and `EntityMutExcept`. These types work just like `EntityRef` and `EntityMut`, but they prevent access to a statically-specified list of components. For example, `EntityMutExcept<(AnimationPlayer, Handle<AnimationGraph>)>` provides mutable access to all components except for `AnimationPlayer` and `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. These types are useful when you need to be able to process arbitrary queries while iterating over the results of another `EntityMut` query. The motivating use case is *generalized animation*, which is an upcoming feature that allows animation of any component property, not just rotation, translation, scaling, or morph weights. To implement this, we must change the current `AnyOf<(&mut Transform, &mut MorphWeights)>` to instead be `EntityMutExcept<(AnimationPlayer, Handle<AnimationGraph>)>`. It's possible to use `FilteredEntityMut` in conjunction with a dynamically-generated system instead, but `FilteredEntityMut` isn't optimized for the use case of a large number of allowed components coupled with a small set of disallowed components. No amount of optimization of `FilteredEntityMut` produced acceptable performance on the `many_foxes` benchmark. `Query<EntityMut, Without<AnimationPlayer>>` will not suffice either, as it's legal and idiomatic for an `AnimationTarget` and an `AnimationPlayer` to coexist on the same entity. An alternate proposal was to implement a somewhat-more-general `Except<Q, CL>` feature, where Q is a `WorldQuery` and CL is a `ComponentList`. I wasn't able to implement that proposal in a reasonable way, because of the fact that methods like `EntityMut::get_mut` and `EntityRef::get` are inherent methods instead of methods on `WorldQuery`, and therefore there was no way to delegate methods like `get` and `get_mut` to the inner query in a generic way. Refactoring those methods into a trait would probably be possible. However, I didn't see a use case for a hypothetical `Except` with arbitrary queries: `Query<Except<(&Transform, &Visibility), Visibility>>` would just be a complicated equivalent to `Query<&Transform>`, for instance. So, out of a desire for simplicity, I omitted a generic `Except` mechanism. I've tested the performance of generalized animation on `many_foxes` and found that, with this patch, `animate_targets` has a 7.4% slowdown over `main`. With `FilteredEntityMut` optimized to use `Arc<Access>`, the slowdown is 75.6%, due to contention on the reference count. Without `Arc<Access>`, the slowdown is even worse, over 2x. ## Testing New tests have been added that check that `EntityRefExcept` and `EntityMutExcept` allow and disallow access to components properly and that the query engine can correctly reject conflicting queries involving those types. A Tracy profile of `many_foxes` with 10,000 foxes showing generalized animation using `FilteredEntityMut` (red) vs. main (yellow) is as follows:  A Tracy profile of `many_foxes` with 10,000 foxes showing generalized animation using this `EntityMutExcept` (yellow) vs. main (red) is as follows:  |
||
![]() |
79f6fcd1eb
|
EntityRef/Mut get_components (immutable variants only) (#15089)
# Objective Smaller scoped version of #13375 without the `_mut` variants which currently have unsoundness issues. ## Solution Same as #13375, but without the `_mut` variants. ## Testing - The same test from #13375 is reused. --- ## Migration Guide - Renamed `FilteredEntityRef::components` to `FilteredEntityRef::accessed_components` and `FilteredEntityMut::components` to `FilteredEntityMut::accessed_components`. --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Periwink <charlesbour@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
ec728c31c1
|
style: simplify string formatting for readability (#15033)
# Objective The goal of this change is to improve code readability and maintainability. |
||
![]() |
938d810766
|
Apply unused_qualifications lint (#14828)
# Objective Fixes #14782 ## Solution Enable the lint and fix all upcoming hints (`--fix`). Also tried to figure out the false-positive (see review comment). Maybe split this PR up into multiple parts where only the last one enables the lint, so some can already be merged resulting in less many files touched / less potential for merge conflicts? Currently, there are some cases where it might be easier to read the code with the qualifier, so perhaps remove the import of it and adapt its cases? In the current stage it's just a plain adoption of the suggestions in order to have a base to discuss. ## Testing `cargo clippy` and `cargo run -p ci` are happy. |
||
![]() |
3a664b052d
|
Separate component and resource access (#14561)
# Objective - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/13139 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7255 - Separates component from resource access so that we can correctly handles edge cases like the issue above - Inspired from https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/14472 ## Solution - Update access to have `component` fields and `resource` fields ## Testing - Added some unit tests |
||
![]() |
856b39d821
|
Apply Clippy lints regarding lazy evaluation and closures (#14015)
# Objective - Lazily evaluate [default](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/unwrap_or_default)~~/[or](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/or_fun_call)~~ values where it makes sense - ~~`unwrap_or(foo())` -> `unwrap_or_else(|| foo())`~~ - `unwrap_or(Default::default())` -> `unwrap_or_default()` - etc. - Avoid creating [redundant closures](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/redundant_closure), even for [method calls](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/redundant_closure_for_method_calls) - `map(|something| something.into())` -> `map(Into:into)` ## Solution - Apply Clippy lints: - ~~[or_fun_call](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/or_fun_call)~~ - [unwrap_or_default](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/unwrap_or_default) - [redundant_closure_for_method_calls](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/redundant_closure_for_method_calls) ([redundant closures](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/redundant_closure) is already enabled) ## Testing - Tested on Windows 11 (`stable-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu`, 1.79.0) - Bevy compiles without errors or warnings and examples seem to work as intended - `cargo clippy` ✅ - `cargo run -p ci -- compile` ✅ --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
84363f2fab
|
Remove redundant imports (#12817)
# Objective - There are several redundant imports in the tests and examples that are not caught by CI because additional flags need to be passed. ## Solution - Run `cargo check --workspace --tests` and `cargo check --workspace --examples`, then fix all warnings. - Add `test-check` to CI, which will be run in the check-compiles job. This should catch future warnings for tests. Examples are already checked, but I'm not yet sure why they weren't caught. ## Discussion - Should the `--tests` and `--examples` flags be added to CI, so this is caught in the future? - If so, #12818 will need to be merged first. It was also a warning raised by checking the examples, but I chose to split off into a separate PR. --------- Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com> |
||
![]() |
56bcbb0975
|
Forbid unsafe in most crates in the engine (#12684)
# Objective Resolves #3824. `unsafe` code should be the exception, not the norm in Rust. It's obviously needed for various use cases as it's interfacing with platforms and essentially running the borrow checker at runtime in the ECS, but the touted benefits of Bevy is that we are able to heavily leverage Rust's safety, and we should be holding ourselves accountable to that by minimizing our unsafe footprint. ## Solution Deny `unsafe_code` workspace wide. Add explicit exceptions for the following crates, and forbid it in almost all of the others. * bevy_ecs - Obvious given how much unsafe is needed to achieve performant results * bevy_ptr - Works with raw pointers, even more low level than bevy_ecs. * bevy_render - due to needing to integrate with wgpu * bevy_window - due to needing to integrate with raw_window_handle * bevy_utils - Several unsafe utilities used by bevy_ecs. Ideally moved into bevy_ecs instead of made publicly usable. * bevy_reflect - Required for the unsafe type casting it's doing. * bevy_transform - for the parallel transform propagation * bevy_gizmos - For the SystemParam impls it has. * bevy_assets - To support reflection. Might not be required, not 100% sure yet. * bevy_mikktspace - due to being a conversion from a C library. Pending safe rewrite. * bevy_dynamic_plugin - Inherently unsafe due to the dynamic loading nature. Several uses of unsafe were rewritten, as they did not need to be using them: * bevy_text - a case of `Option::unchecked` could be rewritten as a normal for loop and match instead of an iterator. * bevy_color - the Pod/Zeroable implementations were replaceable with bytemuck's derive macros. |
||
![]() |
9d67edc3a6
|
fix some typos (#12038)
# Objective Split - containing only the fixed typos - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/12036#pullrequestreview-1894738751 # Migration Guide In `crates/bevy_mikktspace/src/generated.rs` ```rs // before pub struct SGroup { pub iVertexRepresentitive: i32, .. } // after pub struct SGroup { pub iVertexRepresentative: i32, .. } ``` In `crates/bevy_core_pipeline/src/core_2d/mod.rs` ```rs // before Node2D::ConstrastAdaptiveSharpening // after Node2D::ContrastAdaptiveSharpening ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: James Liu <contact@jamessliu.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> |
||
![]() |
f8191bebfb
|
Fix memory leak in dynamic ECS example (#11461)
# Objective - Fix a memory leak in the dynamic ECS example mentioned in #11459 ## Solution - Rather than allocate the memory manually instead store a collection of `Vec` that will be dropped after it is used. --- I must have misinterpreted `OwningPtr`s semantics when initially writing this example. I believe we should be able to provide better APIs here for inserting dynamic components that don't require the user to wrangle so much unsafety. We have no other examples using `insert_by_ids` and our only tests show it being used for 1 or 2 values with nested calls to `OwningPtr::make` despite the function taking an iterator. Rust's type system is quite restrictive here but we could at least let `OwningPtr::new` take non u8 `NonNull`. I also agree with #11459 that we should generally be trying to simplify and clarify this example. |
||
![]() |
ea42d14344
|
Dynamic queries and builder API (#9774)
# Objective Expand the existing `Query` API to support more dynamic use cases i.e. scripting. ## Prior Art - #6390 - #8308 - #10037 ## Solution - Create a `QueryBuilder` with runtime methods to define the set of component accesses for a built query. - Create new `WorldQueryData` implementations `FilteredEntityMut` and `FilteredEntityRef` as variants of `EntityMut` and `EntityRef` that provide run time checked access to the components included in a given query. - Add new methods to `Query` to create "query lens" with a subset of the access of the initial query. ### Query Builder The `QueryBuilder` API allows you to define a query at runtime. At it's most basic use it will simply create a query with the corresponding type signature: ```rust let query = QueryBuilder::<Entity, With<A>>::new(&mut world).build(); // is equivalent to let query = QueryState::<Entity, With<A>>::new(&mut world); ``` Before calling `.build()` you also have the opportunity to add additional accesses and filters. Here is a simple example where we add additional filter terms: ```rust let entity_a = world.spawn((A(0), B(0))).id(); let entity_b = world.spawn((A(0), C(0))).id(); let mut query_a = QueryBuilder::<Entity>::new(&mut world) .with::<A>() .without::<C>() .build(); assert_eq!(entity_a, query_a.single(&world)); ``` This alone is useful in that allows you to decide which archetypes your query will match at runtime. However it is also very limited, consider a case like the following: ```rust let query_a = QueryBuilder::<&A>::new(&mut world) // Add an additional access .data::<&B>() .build(); ``` This will grant the query an additional read access to component B however we have no way of accessing the data while iterating as the type signature still only includes &A. For an even more concrete example of this consider dynamic components: ```rust let query_a = QueryBuilder::<Entity>::new(&mut world) // Adding a filter is easy since it doesn't need be read later .with_id(component_id_a) // How do I access the data of this component? .ref_id(component_id_b) .build(); ``` With this in mind the `QueryBuilder` API seems somewhat incomplete by itself, we need some way method of accessing the components dynamically. So here's one: ### Query Transmutation If the problem is not having the component in the type signature why not just add it? This PR also adds transmute methods to `QueryBuilder` and `QueryState`. Here's a simple example: ```rust world.spawn(A(0)); world.spawn((A(1), B(0))); let mut query = QueryBuilder::<()>::new(&mut world) .with::<B>() .transmute::<&A>() .build(); query.iter(&world).for_each(|a| assert_eq!(a.0, 1)); ``` The `QueryState` and `QueryBuilder` transmute methods look quite similar but are different in one respect. Transmuting a builder will always succeed as it will just add the additional accesses needed for the new terms if they weren't already included. Transmuting a `QueryState` will panic in the case that the new type signature would give it access it didn't already have, for example: ```rust let query = QueryState::<&A, Option<&B>>::new(&mut world); /// This is fine, the access for Option<&A> is less restrictive than &A query.transmute::<Option<&A>>(&world); /// Oh no, this would allow access to &B on entities that might not have it, so it panics query.transmute::<&B>(&world); /// This is right out query.transmute::<&C>(&world); ``` This is quite an appealing API to also have available on `Query` however it does pose one additional wrinkle: In order to to change the iterator we need to create a new `QueryState` to back it. `Query` doesn't own it's own state though, it just borrows it, so we need a place to borrow it from. This is why `QueryLens` exists, it is a place to store the new state so it can be borrowed when you call `.query()` leaving you with an API like this: ```rust fn function_that_takes_a_query(query: &Query<&A>) { // ... } fn system(query: Query<(&A, &B)>) { let lens = query.transmute_lens::<&A>(); let q = lens.query(); function_that_takes_a_query(&q); } ``` Now you may be thinking: Hey, wait a second, you introduced the problem with dynamic components and then described a solution that only works for static components! Ok, you got me, I guess we need a bit more: ### Filtered Entity References Currently the only way you can access dynamic components on entities through a query is with either `EntityMut` or `EntityRef`, however these can access all components and so conflict with all other accesses. This PR introduces `FilteredEntityMut` and `FilteredEntityRef` as alternatives that have additional runtime checking to prevent accessing components that you shouldn't. This way you can build a query with a `QueryBuilder` and actually access the components you asked for: ```rust let mut query = QueryBuilder::<FilteredEntityRef>::new(&mut world) .ref_id(component_id_a) .with(component_id_b) .build(); let entity_ref = query.single(&world); // Returns Some(Ptr) as we have that component and are allowed to read it let a = entity_ref.get_by_id(component_id_a); // Will return None even though the entity does have the component, as we are not allowed to read it let b = entity_ref.get_by_id(component_id_b); ``` For the most part these new structs have the exact same methods as their non-filtered equivalents. Putting all of this together we can do some truly dynamic ECS queries, check out the `dynamic` example to see it in action: ``` Commands: comp, c Create new components spawn, s Spawn entities query, q Query for entities Enter a command with no parameters for usage. > c A, B, C, Data 4 Component A created with id: 0 Component B created with id: 1 Component C created with id: 2 Component Data created with id: 3 > s A, B, Data 1 Entity spawned with id: 0v0 > s A, C, Data 0 Entity spawned with id: 1v0 > q &Data 0v0: Data: [1, 0, 0, 0] 1v0: Data: [0, 0, 0, 0] > q B, &mut Data 0v0: Data: [2, 1, 1, 1] > q B || C, &Data 0v0: Data: [2, 1, 1, 1] 1v0: Data: [0, 0, 0, 0] ``` ## Changelog - Add new `transmute_lens` methods to `Query`. - Add new types `QueryBuilder`, `FilteredEntityMut`, `FilteredEntityRef` and `QueryLens` - `update_archetype_component_access` has been removed, archetype component accesses are now determined by the accesses set in `update_component_access` - Added method `set_access` to `WorldQuery`, this is called before `update_component_access` for queries that have a restricted set of accesses, such as those built by `QueryBuilder` or `QueryLens`. This is primarily used by the `FilteredEntity*` variants and has an empty trait implementation. - Added method `get_state` to `WorldQuery` as a fallible version of `init_state` when you don't have `&mut World` access. ## Future Work Improve performance of `FilteredEntityMut` and `FilteredEntityRef`, currently they have to determine the accesses a query has in a given archetype during iteration which is far from ideal, especially since we already did the work when matching the archetype in the first place. To avoid making more internal API changes I have left it out of this PR. --------- Co-authored-by: Mike Hsu <mike.hsu@gmail.com> |