037f9d414b
25 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gino Valente
|
ccb9d0500f
|
bevy_reflect: Recursive registration (#5781)
# Objective Resolves #4154 Currently, registration must all be done manually: ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo(Bar); #[derive(Reflect)] struct Bar(Baz); #[derive(Reflect)] struct Baz(usize); fn main() { // ... app .register_type::<Foo>() .register_type::<Bar>() .register_type::<Baz>() // .register_type::<usize>() <- This one is handled by Bevy, thankfully // ... } ``` This can grow really quickly and become very annoying to add, remove, and update as types change. It would be great if we could help reduce the number of types that a user must manually implement themselves. ## Solution As suggested in #4154, this PR adds automatic recursive registration. Essentially, when a type is registered, it may now also choose to register additional types along with it using the new `GetTypeRegistration::register_type_dependencies` trait method. The `Reflect` derive macro now automatically does this for all fields in structs, tuple structs, struct variants, and tuple variants. This is also done for tuples, arrays, `Vec<T>`, `HashMap<K, V>`, and `Option<T>`. This allows us to simplify the code above like: ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo(Bar); #[derive(Reflect)] struct Bar(Baz); #[derive(Reflect)] struct Baz(usize); fn main() { // ... app.register_type::<Foo>() // ... } ``` This automatic registration only occurs if the type has not yet been registered. If it has been registered, we simply skip it and move to the next one. This reduces the cost of registration and prevents overwriting customized registrations. ## Considerations While this does improve ergonomics on one front, it's important to look at some of the arguments against adopting a PR like this. #### Generic Bounds ~~Since we need to be able to register the fields individually, we need those fields to implement `GetTypeRegistration`. This forces users to then add this trait as a bound on their generic arguments. This annoyance could be relieved with something like #5772.~~ This is no longer a major issue as the `Reflect` derive now adds the `GetTypeRegistration` bound by default. This should technically be okay, since we already add the `Reflect` bound. However, this can also be considered a breaking change for manual implementations that left out a `GetTypeRegistration` impl ~~or for items that contain dynamic types (e.g. `DynamicStruct`) since those also do not implement `GetTypeRegistration`~~. #### Registration Assumptions By automatically registering fields, users might inadvertently be relying on certain types to be automatically registered. If `Foo` auto-registers `Bar`, but `Foo` is later removed from the code, then anywhere that previously used or relied on `Bar`'s registration would now fail. --- ## Changelog - Added recursive type registration to structs, tuple structs, struct variants, tuple variants, tuples, arrays, `Vec<T>`, `HashMap<K, V>`, and `Option<T>` - Added a new trait in the hidden `bevy_reflect::__macro_exports` module called `RegisterForReflection` - Added `GetTypeRegistration` impl for `bevy_render::render_asset::RenderAssetUsages` ## Migration Guide All types that derive `Reflect` will now automatically add `GetTypeRegistration` as a bound on all (unignored) fields. This means that all reflected fields will need to also implement `GetTypeRegistration`. If all fields **derive** `Reflect` or are implemented in `bevy_reflect`, this should not cause any issues. However, manual implementations of `Reflect` that excluded a `GetTypeRegistration` impl for their type will need to add one. ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo<T: FromReflect> { data: MyCustomType<T> } // OLD impl<T: FromReflect> Reflect for MyCustomType<T> {/* ... */} // NEW impl<T: FromReflect + GetTypeRegistration> Reflect for MyCustomType<T> {/* ... */} impl<T: FromReflect + GetTypeRegistration> GetTypeRegistration for MyCustomType<T> {/* ... */} ``` --------- Co-authored-by: James Liu <contact@jamessliu.com> Co-authored-by: radiish <cb.setho@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
|
Ame
|
9d67edc3a6
|
fix some typos (#12038)
# Objective Split - containing only the fixed typos - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/12036#pullrequestreview-1894738751 # Migration Guide In `crates/bevy_mikktspace/src/generated.rs` ```rs // before pub struct SGroup { pub iVertexRepresentitive: i32, .. } // after pub struct SGroup { pub iVertexRepresentative: i32, .. } ``` In `crates/bevy_core_pipeline/src/core_2d/mod.rs` ```rs // before Node2D::ConstrastAdaptiveSharpening // after Node2D::ContrastAdaptiveSharpening ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: James Liu <contact@jamessliu.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> |
||
|
Gino Valente
|
9e30aa7c92
|
bevy_reflect_derive: Clean up attribute logic (#11777)
# Objective The code in `bevy_reflect_derive` could use some cleanup. ## Solution Took some of the changes in #11659 to create a dedicated PR for cleaning up the field and container attribute logic. #### Updated Naming I renamed `ReflectTraits` and `ReflectFieldAttr` to `ContainerAttributes` and `FieldAttributes`, respectively. I think these are clearer. #### Updated Parsing ##### Readability The parsing logic wasn't too bad before, but it was getting difficult to read. There was some duplicated logic between `Meta::List` and `Meta::Path` attributes. Additionally, all the logic was kept inside a large method. To simply things, I replaced the nested meta parsing with `ParseStream` parsing. In my opinion, this is easier to follow since it breaks up the large match statement into a small set of single-line if statements, where each if-block contains a single call to the appropriate attribute parsing method. ##### Flexibility On top of the added simplicity, this also makes our attribute parsing much more flexible. It allows us to more elegantly handle custom where clauses (i.e. `#[reflect(where T: Foo)]`) and it opens the door for more non-standard attribute syntax (e.g. #11659). ##### Errors This also allows us to automatically provide certain errors when parsing. For example, since we can use `stream.lookahead1()`, we get errors like the following for free: ``` error: expected one of: `ignore`, `skip_serializing`, `default` --> crates/bevy_reflect/src/lib.rs:1988:23 | 1988 | #[reflect(foo)] | ^^^ ``` --- ## Changelog > [!note] > All changes are internal to `bevy_reflect_derive` and should not affect the public API[^1]. - Renamed `ReflectTraits` to `ContainerAttributes` - Renamed `ReflectMeta::traits` to `ReflectMeta::attrs` - Renamed `ReflectFieldAttr` to `FieldAttributes` - Updated parsing logic for field/container attribute parsing - Now uses a `ParseStream` directly instead of nested meta parsing - General code cleanup of the field/container attribute modules for `bevy_reflect_derive` [^1]: Does not include errors, which may look slightly different. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
Gino Valente
|
379b9e5cb6
|
bevy_reflect: Split #[reflect(where)] (#11597)
# Objective Revert the changes to type parameter bounds introduced in #9046, improves the `#[reflect(where)]` attribute (also from #9046), and adds the ability to opt out of field bounds. This is based on suggestions by @soqb and discussion on [Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1002362493634629796/1201227833826103427). ## Solution Reverts the changes to type parameter bounds when deriving `Reflect`, introduced in #9046. This was originally done as a means of fixing a recursion issue (#8965). However, as @soqb pointed out, we could achieve the same result by simply making an opt-out attribute instead of messing with the type parameter bounds. This PR has four main changes: 1. Reverts the type parameter bounds from #9046 2. Includes `TypePath` as a default bound for active fields 3. Changes `#reflect(where)]` to be strictly additive 4. Adds `#reflect(no_field_bounds)]` to opt out of field bounds Change 1 means that, like before, type parameters only receive at most the `TypePath` bound (if `#[reflect(type_path = false)]` is not present) and active fields receive the `Reflect` or `FromReflect` bound. And with Change 2, they will also receive `TypePath` (since it's indirectly required by `Typed` to construct `NamedField` and `UnnamedField` instances). Change 3 was made to make room for Change 4. By splitting out the responsibility of `#reflect(where)]`, we can use it with or without `#reflect(no_field_bounds)]` for various use cases. For example, if we hadn't done this, the following would have failed: ```rust // Since we're not using `#reflect(no_field_bounds)]`, // `T::Assoc` is automatically given the required bounds // of `FromReflect + TypePath` #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(where T::Assoc: OtherTrait)] struct Foo<T: MyTrait> { value: T::Assoc, } ``` This provides more flexibility to the user while still letting them add or remove most trait bounds. And to solve the original recursion issue, we can do: ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(no_field_bounds)] // <-- Added struct Foo { foo: Vec<Foo> } ``` #### Bounds All in all, we now have four sets of trait bounds: - `Self` gets the bounds `Any + Send + Sync` - Type parameters get the bound `TypePath`. This can be opted out of with `#[reflect(type_path = false)]` - Active fields get the bounds `TypePath` and `FromReflect`/`Reflect` bounds. This can be opted out of with `#reflect(no_field_bounds)]` - Custom bounds can be added with `#[reflect(where)]` --- ## Changelog - Revert some changes #9046 - `#reflect(where)]` is now strictly additive - Added `#reflect(no_field_bounds)]` attribute to opt out of automatic field trait bounds when deriving `Reflect` - Made the `TypePath` requirement on fields when deriving `Reflect` more explicit ## Migration Guide > [!important] > This PR shouldn't be a breaking change relative to the current version of Bevy (v0.12). And since it removes the breaking parts of #9046, that PR also won't need a migration guide. |
||
|
Gino Valente
|
6e959db134
|
bevy_reflect: Type parameter bounds (#9046)
# Objective
Fixes #8965.
#### Background
For convenience and to ensure everything is setup properly, we
automatically add certain bounds to the derived types. The current
implementation does this by taking the types from all active fields and
adding them to the where-clause of the generated impls. I believe this
method was chosen because it won't add bounds to types that are
otherwise ignored.
```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Foo<T, U: SomeTrait, V> {
t: T,
u: U::Assoc,
#[reflect(ignore)]
v: [V; 2]
}
// Generates something like:
impl<T, U: SomeTrait, V> for Foo<T, U, V>
where
// Active:
T: Reflect,
U::Assoc: Reflect,
// Ignored:
[V; 2]: Send + Sync + Any
{
// ...
}
```
The self-referential type fails because it ends up using _itself_ as a
type bound due to being one of its own active fields.
```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Foo {
foo: Vec<Foo>
}
// Foo where Vec<Foo>: Reflect -> Vec<T> where T: Reflect -> Foo where Vec<Foo>: Reflect -> ...
```
## Solution
We can't simply parse all field types for the name of our type. That
would be both complex and prone to errors and false-positives. And even
if it wasn't, what would we replace the bound with?
Instead, I opted to go for a solution that only adds the bounds to what
really needs it: the type parameters. While the bounds on concrete types
make errors a bit cleaner, they aren't strictly necessary. This means we
can change our generated where-clause to only add bounds to generic type
parameters.
Doing this, though, returns us back to the problem of over-bounding
parameters that don't need to be bounded. To solve this, I added a new
container attribute (based on
[this](https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/issues/422#issuecomment-406882925)
comment and @nicopap's
[comment](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/9046#issuecomment-1623593780))
that allows us to pass in a custom where clause to modify what bounds
are added to these type parameters.
This allows us to do stuff like:
```rust
trait Trait {
type Assoc;
}
// We don't need `T` to be reflectable since we only care about `T::Assoc`.
#[derive(Reflect)]
#[reflect(where T::Assoc: FromReflect)]
struct Foo<T: Trait>(T::Assoc);
#[derive(TypePath)]
struct Bar;
impl Trait for Bar {
type Assoc = usize;
}
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Baz {
a: Foo<Bar>,
}
```
> **Note**
> I also
[tried](
|
||
|
Doonv
|
189ceaf0d3
|
Replace or document ignored doctests (#11040)
# Objective There are a lot of doctests that are `ignore`d for no documented reason. And that should be fixed. ## Solution I searched the bevy repo with the regex ` ```[a-z,]*ignore ` in order to find all `ignore`d doctests. For each one of the `ignore`d doctests, I did the following steps: 1. Attempt to remove the `ignored` attribute while still passing the test. I did this by adding hidden dummy structs and imports. 2. If step 1 doesn't work, attempt to replace the `ignored` attribute with the `no_run` attribute while still passing the test. 3. If step 2 doesn't work, keep the `ignored` attribute but add documentation for why the `ignored` attribute was added. --------- Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> |
||
|
radiish
|
13feac6721
|
reflect: maximally relax TypePath bounds (#11037)
# Objective - Provides an alternate solution to the one implemented in #10791 without breaking changes. ## Solution - Changes the bounds of macro-generated `TypePath` implementations to universally ignore the types of fields, rather than use the same bounds as other implementations. I think this is a more holistic solution than #10791 because it totally erases the finicky bounds we currently generate, helping to untangle the reflection trait system. |
||
|
Gino Valente
|
daa8bf20df
|
Fix nested generics in Reflect derive (#10791)
# Objective > Issue raised on [Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1002362493634629796/1179182488787103776) Currently the following code fails due to a missing `TypePath` bound: ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo<T>(T); #[derive(Reflect)] struct Bar<T>(Foo<T>); #[derive(Reflect)] struct Baz<T>(Bar<Foo<T>>); ``` ## Solution Add `TypePath` to the per-field bounds instead of _just_ the generic type parameter bounds. ### Related Work It should be noted that #9046 would help make these kinds of issues easier to work around and/or avoid entirely. --- ## Changelog - Fixes missing `TypePath` requirement when deriving `Reflect` on nested generics |
||
|
Gino Valente
|
60773e6787
|
bevy_reflect: Fix ignored/skipped field order (#7575)
# Objective Fixes #5101 Alternative to #6511 ## Solution Corrected the behavior for ignored fields in `FromReflect`, which was previously using the incorrect field indexes. Similarly, fields marked with `#[reflect(skip_serializing)]` no longer break when using `FromReflect` after deserialization. This was done by modifying `SerializationData` to store a function pointer that can later be used to generate a default instance of the skipped field during deserialization. The function pointer points to a function generated by the derive macro using the behavior designated by `#[reflect(default)]` (or just `Default` if none provided). The entire output of the macro is now wrapped in an [unnamed constant](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference/items/constant-items.html#unnamed-constant) which keeps this behavior hygienic. #### Rationale The biggest downside to this approach is that it requires fields marked `#[reflect(skip_serializing)]` to provide the ability to create a default instance— either via a `Default` impl or by specifying a custom one. While this isn't great, I think it might be justified by the fact that we really need to create this value when using `FromReflect` on a deserialized object. And we need to do this _during_ deserialization because after that (at least for tuples and tuple structs) we lose information about which field is which: _"is the value at index 1 in this `DynamicTupleStruct` the actual value for index 1 or is it really the value for index 2 since index 1 is skippable...?"_ #### Alternatives An alternative would be to store `Option<Box<dyn Reflect>>` within `DynamicTuple` and `DynamicTupleStruct` instead of just `Box<dyn Reflect>`. This would allow us to insert "empty"/"missing" fields during deserialization, thus saving the positional information of the skipped fields. However, this may require changing the API of `Tuple` and `TupleStruct` such that they can account for their dynamic counterparts returning `None` for a skipped field. In practice this would probably mean exposing the `Option`-ness of the dynamics onto implementors via methods like `Tuple::drain` or `TupleStruct::field`. Personally, I think requiring `Default` would be better than muddying up the API to account for these special cases. But I'm open to trying out this other approach if the community feels that it's better. --- ## Changelog ### Public Changes #### Fixed - The behaviors of `#[reflect(ignore)]` and `#[reflect(skip_serializing)]` are no longer dependent on field order #### Changed - Fields marked with `#[reflect(skip_serializing)]` now need to either implement `Default` or specify a custom default function using `#[reflect(default = "path::to::some_func")]` - Deserializing a type with fields marked `#[reflect(skip_serializing)]` will now include that field initialized to its specified default value - `SerializationData::new` now takes the new `SkippedField` struct along with the skipped field index - Renamed `SerializationData::is_ignored_field` to `SerializationData::is_field_skipped` #### Added - Added `SkippedField` struct - Added methods `SerializationData::generate_default` and `SerializationData::iter_skipped` ### Internal Changes #### Changed - Replaced `members_to_serialization_denylist` and `BitSet<u32>` with `SerializationDataDef` - The `Reflect` derive is more hygienic as it now outputs within an [unnamed constant](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference/items/constant-items.html#unnamed-constant) - `StructField::index` has been split up into `StructField::declaration_index` and `StructField::reflection_index` #### Removed - Removed `bitset` dependency ## Migration Guide * Fields marked `#[reflect(skip_serializing)]` now must implement `Default` or specify a custom default function with `#[reflect(default = "path::to::some_func")]` ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct MyStruct { #[reflect(skip_serializing)] #[reflect(default = "get_foo_default")] foo: Foo, // <- `Foo` does not impl `Default` so requires a custom function #[reflect(skip_serializing)] bar: Bar, // <- `Bar` impls `Default` } #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo(i32); #[derive(Reflect, Default)] struct Bar(i32); fn get_foo_default() -> Foo { Foo(123) } ``` * `SerializationData::new` has been changed to expect an iterator of `(usize, SkippedField)` rather than one of just `usize` ```rust // BEFORE SerializationData::new([0, 3].into_iter()); // AFTER SerializationData::new([ (0, SkippedField::new(field_0_default_fn)), (3, SkippedField::new(field_3_default_fn)), ].into_iter()); ``` * `Serialization::is_ignored_field` has been renamed to `Serialization::is_field_skipped` * Fields marked `#[reflect(skip_serializing)]` are now included in deserialization output. This may affect logic that expected those fields to be absent. |
||
|
Zachary Harrold
|
e5dbde86fb
|
Moved fq_std from bevy_reflect_derive to bevy_macro_utils (#9956)
# Objective - Fixes #9363 ## Solution Moved `fq_std` from `bevy_reflect_derive` to `bevy_macro_utils`. This does make the `FQ*` types public where they were previously private, which is a change to the public-facing API, but I don't believe a breaking one. Additionally, I've done a basic QA pass over the `bevy_macro_utils` crate, adding `deny(unsafe)`, `warn(missing_docs)`, and documentation where required. |
||
|
Gino Valente
|
f96cd758cd
|
bevy_reflect: Opt-out attribute for TypePath (#9140)
# Objective Fixes #9094 ## Solution Takes a bit from [this](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/9094#issuecomment-1629333851) comment as well as a [comment](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1002362493634629796/1128024873260810271) from @soqb. This allows users to opt-out of the `TypePath` implementation that is automatically generated by the `Reflect` derive macro, allowing custom `TypePath` implementations. ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(type_path = false)] struct Foo<T> { #[reflect(ignore)] _marker: PhantomData<T>, } struct NotTypePath; impl<T: 'static> TypePath for Foo<T> { fn type_path() -> &'static str { std::any::type_name::<Self>() } fn short_type_path() -> &'static str { static CELL: GenericTypePathCell = GenericTypePathCell::new(); CELL.get_or_insert::<Self, _>(|| { bevy_utils::get_short_name(std::any::type_name::<Self>()) }) } fn crate_name() -> Option<&'static str> { Some("my_crate") } fn module_path() -> Option<&'static str> { Some("my_crate::foo") } fn type_ident() -> Option<&'static str> { Some("Foo") } } // Can use `TypePath` let _ = <Foo<NotTypePath> as TypePath>::type_path(); // Can register the type let mut registry = TypeRegistry::default(); registry.register::<Foo<NotTypePath>>(); ``` #### Type Path Stability The stability of type paths mainly come into play during serialization. If a type is moved between builds, an unstable type path may become invalid. Users that opt-out of `TypePath` and rely on something like `std::any::type_name` as in the example above, should be aware that this solution removes the stability guarantees. Deserialization thus expects that type to never move. If it does, then the serialized type paths will need to be updated accordingly. If a user depends on stability, they will need to implement that stability logic manually (probably by looking at the expanded output of a typical `Reflect`/`TypePath` derive). This could be difficult for type parameters that don't/can't implement `TypePath`, and will need to make heavy use of string parsing and manipulation to achieve the same effect (alternatively, they can choose to simply exclude any type parameter that doesn't implement `TypePath`). --- ## Changelog - Added the `#[reflect(type_path = false)]` attribute to opt out of the `TypePath` impl when deriving `Reflect` --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
|
Gino Valente
|
aeeb20ec4c
|
bevy_reflect: FromReflect Ergonomics Implementation (#6056)
# Objective **This implementation is based on https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/59.** --- Resolves #4597 Full details and motivation can be found in the RFC, but here's a brief summary. `FromReflect` is a very powerful and important trait within the reflection API. It allows Dynamic types (e.g., `DynamicList`, etc.) to be formed into Real ones (e.g., `Vec<i32>`, etc.). This mainly comes into play concerning deserialization, where the reflection deserializers both return a `Box<dyn Reflect>` that almost always contain one of these Dynamic representations of a Real type. To convert this to our Real type, we need to use `FromReflect`. It also sneaks up in other ways. For example, it's a required bound for `T` in `Vec<T>` so that `Vec<T>` as a whole can be made `FromReflect`. It's also required by all fields of an enum as it's used as part of the `Reflect::apply` implementation. So in other words, much like `GetTypeRegistration` and `Typed`, it is very much a core reflection trait. The problem is that it is not currently treated like a core trait and is not automatically derived alongside `Reflect`. This makes using it a bit cumbersome and easy to forget. ## Solution Automatically derive `FromReflect` when deriving `Reflect`. Users can then choose to opt-out if needed using the `#[reflect(from_reflect = false)]` attribute. ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Bar; fn test<T: FromReflect>(value: T) {} test(Foo); // <-- OK test(Bar); // <-- Panic! Bar does not implement trait `FromReflect` ``` #### `ReflectFromReflect` This PR also automatically adds the `ReflectFromReflect` (introduced in #6245) registration to the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl— if the type hasn't opted out of `FromReflect` of course. <details> <summary><h4>Improved Deserialization</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. And since we can do all the above, we might as well improve deserialization. We can now choose to deserialize into a Dynamic type or automatically convert it using `FromReflect` under the hood. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new` will now perform the conversion and return the `Box`'d Real type. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` will work like what we have now and simply return the `Box`'d Dynamic type. ```rust // Returns the Real type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(®istry); let mut deserializer = ron:🇩🇪:Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // Returns the Dynamic type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(®istry); let mut deserializer = ron:🇩🇪:Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` </details> --- ## Changelog * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro * This includes auto-registering `ReflectFromReflect` in the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl * ~~Renamed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic`, respectively~~ **Descoped** * ~~Changed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to automatically convert the deserialized output using `FromReflect`~~ **Descoped** ## Migration Guide * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro. Items with both derives will need to remove the `FromReflect` one. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)] struct Foo; // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; ``` If using a manual implementation of `FromReflect` and the `Reflect` derive, users will need to opt-out of the automatic implementation. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} ``` <details> <summary><h4>Removed Migrations</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. * The reflect deserializers now perform a `FromReflect` conversion internally. The expected output of `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` is no longer a Dynamic (e.g., `DynamicList`), but its Real counterpart (e.g., `Vec<i32>`). ```rust let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(®istry); let mut deserializer = ron:🇩🇪:Deserializer::from_str(input)?; // OLD let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // NEW let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` Alternatively, if this behavior isn't desired, use the `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` methods instead: ```rust // OLD let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(®istry); // NEW let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(®istry); ``` </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
|
Jamie Ridding
|
1e97c79ec1
|
bevy_reflect: Disambiguate type bounds in where clauses. (#8761)
# Objective
It was accidentally found that rustc is unable to parse certain
constructs in `where` clauses properly. `bevy_reflect::Reflect`'s habit
of copying and pasting the field types in a type's definition to its
`where` clauses made it very easy to accidentally run into this
behaviour - particularly with the construct
```rust
where
for<'a> fn(&'a T) -> &'a T: Trait1 + Trait2
```
which was incorrectly parsed as
```rust
where
for<'a> (fn(&'a T) -> &'a T: Trait1 + Trait2)
^ ^ incorrect syntax grouping
```
instead of
```rust
where
(for<'a> fn(&'a T) -> &'a T): Trait1 + Trait2
^ ^ correct syntax grouping
```
Fixes #8759
## Solution
This commit fixes the issue by inserting explicit parentheses to
disambiguate types from their bound lists.
|
||
|
radiish
|
1efc762924
|
reflect: stable type path v2 (#7184)
# Objective
- Introduce a stable alternative to
[`std::any::type_name`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/any/fn.type_name.html).
- Rewrite of #5805 with heavy inspiration in design.
- On the path to #5830.
- Part of solving #3327.
## Solution
- Add a `TypePath` trait for static stable type path/name information.
- Add a `TypePath` derive macro.
- Add a `impl_type_path` macro for implementing internal and foreign
types in `bevy_reflect`.
---
## Changelog
- Added `TypePath` trait.
- Added `DynamicTypePath` trait and `get_type_path` method to `Reflect`.
- Added a `TypePath` derive macro.
- Added a `bevy_reflect::impl_type_path` for implementing `TypePath` on
internal and foreign types in `bevy_reflect`.
- Changed `bevy_reflect::utility::(Non)GenericTypeInfoCell` to
`(Non)GenericTypedCell<T>` which allows us to be generic over both
`TypeInfo` and `TypePath`.
- `TypePath` is now a supertrait of `Asset`, `Material` and
`Material2d`.
- `impl_reflect_struct` needs a `#[type_path = "..."]` attribute to be
specified.
- `impl_reflect_value` needs to either specify path starting with a
double colon (`::core::option::Option`) or an `in my_crate::foo`
declaration.
- Added `bevy_reflect_derive::ReflectTypePath`.
- Most uses of `Ident` in `bevy_reflect_derive` changed to use
`ReflectTypePath`.
## Migration Guide
- Implementors of `Asset`, `Material` and `Material2d` now also need to
derive `TypePath`.
- Manual implementors of `Reflect` will need to implement the new
`get_type_path` method.
## Open Questions
- [x] ~This PR currently does not migrate any usages of
`std::any::type_name` to use `bevy_reflect::TypePath` to ease the review
process. Should it?~ Migration will be left to a follow-up PR.
- [ ] This PR adds a lot of `#[derive(TypePath)]` and `T: TypePath` to
satisfy new bounds, mostly when deriving `TypeUuid`. Should we make
`TypePath` a supertrait of `TypeUuid`? [Should we remove `TypeUuid` in
favour of
`TypePath`?](
|
||
|
Wybe Westra
|
abf12f3b3b
|
Fixed several missing links in docs. (#8117)
Links in the api docs are nice. I noticed that there were several places where structs / functions and other things were referenced in the docs, but weren't linked. I added the links where possible / logical. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> |
||
|
Mikkel Rasmussen
|
e9312254d8
|
Non-breaking change* from UK spellings to US (#8291)
Fixes issue mentioned in PR #8285. _Note: By mistake, this is currently dependent on #8285_ # Objective Ensure consistency in the spelling of the documentation. Exceptions: `crates/bevy_mikktspace/src/generated.rs` - Has not been changed from licence to license as it is part of a licensing agreement. Maybe for further consistency, https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy-website should also be given a look. ## Solution ### Changed the spelling of the current words (UK/CN/AU -> US) : cancelled -> canceled (Breaking API changes in #8285) behaviour -> behavior (Breaking API changes in #8285) neighbour -> neighbor grey -> gray recognise -> recognize centre -> center metres -> meters colour -> color ### ~~Update [`engine_style_guide.md`]~~ Moved to #8324 --- ## Changelog Changed UK spellings in documentation to US ## Migration Guide Non-breaking changes* \* If merged after #8285 |
||
|
Gino Valente
|
5e5a305d43
|
bevy_reflect: Fix trailing comma breaking derives (#8014)
# Objective Fixes #7989 Based on #7991 by @CoffeeVampir3 ## Solution There were three parts to this issue: 1. `extend_where_clause` did not account for the optionality of a where clause's trailing comma ```rust // OKAY struct Foo<T> where T: Asset, {/* ... */} // ERROR struct Foo<T> where T: Asset {/* ... */} ``` 2. `FromReflect` derive logic was not actively using `extend_where_clause` which led to some inconsistencies (enums weren't adding _any_ additional bounds even) 3. Using `extend_where_clause` in the `FromReflect` derive logic meant we had to optionally add `Default` bounds to ignored fields iff the entire item itself was not already `Default` (otherwise the definition for `Handle<T>` wouldn't compile since `HandleType` doesn't impl `Default` but `Handle<T>` itself does) --- ## Changelog - Fixed issue where a missing trailing comma could break the reflection derives |
||
|
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine
|
e22572d9a3
|
Fix typo in utility.rs (#7997) | ||
|
MinerSebas
|
e5b522064c |
Follow up on Todo in bevy_reflect_derive (#7461)
# Objective
Follow up on Todo in bevy_reflect_derive
## Solution
- Replaced all Instances that do the same as `ident_or_index` with a call to it.
- Only the following Line wasn't replaced, as it only wants the index, and not the ident:
[
|
||
|
Charles Bournhonesque
|
cbb4c26cad |
Enable deriving Reflect on structs with generic types (#7364)
# Objective
I recently had an issue, where I have a struct:
```
struct Property {
inner: T
}
```
that I use as a wrapper for internal purposes.
I don't want to update my struct definition to
```
struct Property<T: Reflect>{
inner: T
}
```
because I still want to be able to build `Property<T>` for types `T` that are not `Reflect`. (and also because I don't want to update my whole code base with `<T: Reflect>` bounds)
I still wanted to have reflection on it (for `bevy_inspector_egui`), but adding `derive(Reflect)` fails with the error:
`T cannot be sent between threads safely. T needs to implement Sync.`
I believe that `bevy_reflect` should adopt the model of other derives in the case of generics, which is to add the `Reflect` implementation only if the generics also implement `Reflect`. (That is the behaviour of other macros such as `derive(Clone)` or `derive(Debug)`.
It's also the current behavior of `derive(FromReflect)`.
Basically doing something like:
```
impl<T> Reflect for Foo<T>
where T: Reflect
```
## Solution
- I updated the derive macros for `Structs` and `TupleStructs` to add extra `where` bounds.
- Every type that is reflected will need a `T: Reflect` bound
- Ignored types will need a `T: 'static + Send + Sync` bound. Here's the reason. For cases like this:
```
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Foo<T, U>{
a: T
#[reflect(ignore)]
b: U
}
```
I had to add the bound `'static + Send + Sync` to ignored generics like `U`.
The reason is that we want `Foo<T, U>` to be `Reflect: 'static + Send + Sync`, so `Foo<T, U>` must be able to implement those auto-traits. `Foo<T, U>` will only implement those auto-traits if every generic type implements them, including ignored types.
This means that the previously compile-fail case now compiles:
```
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Foo<'a> {
#[reflect(ignore)]
value: &'a str,
}
```
But `Foo<'a>` will only be useable in the cases where `'a: 'static` and panic if we don't have `'a: 'static`, which is what we want (nice bonus from this PR ;) )
---
## Changelog
> This section is optional. If this was a trivial fix, or has no externally-visible impact, you can delete this section.
### Added
Possibility to add `derive(Reflect)` to structs and enums that contain generic types, like so:
```
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Foo<T>{
a: T
}
```
Reflection will only be available if the generic type T also implements `Reflect`.
(previously, this would just return a compiler error)
|
||
|
Jakob Hellermann
|
e71c4d2802 |
fix nightly clippy warnings (#6395)
# Objective
- fix new clippy lints before they get stable and break CI
## Solution
- run `clippy --fix` to auto-fix machine-applicable lints
- silence `clippy::should_implement_trait` for `fn HandleId::default<T: Asset>`
## Changes
- always prefer `format!("{inline}")` over `format!("{}", not_inline)`
- prefer `Box::default` (or `Box::<T>::default` if necessary) over `Box::new(T::default())`
|
||
|
Gino Valente
|
d30d3e752a |
bevy_reflect: Improve serialization format even more (#5723)
> Note: This is rebased off #4561 and can be viewed as a competitor to that PR. See `Comparison with #4561` section for details. # Objective The current serialization format used by `bevy_reflect` is both verbose and error-prone. Taking the following structs[^1] for example: ```rust // -- src/inventory.rs #[derive(Reflect)] struct Inventory { id: String, max_storage: usize, items: Vec<Item> } #[derive(Reflect)] struct Item { name: String } ``` Given an inventory of a single item, this would serialize to something like: ```rust // -- assets/inventory.ron { "type": "my_game::inventory::Inventory", "struct": { "id": { "type": "alloc::string::String", "value": "inv001", }, "max_storage": { "type": "usize", "value": 10 }, "items": { "type": "alloc::vec::Vec<alloc::string::String>", "list": [ { "type": "my_game::inventory::Item", "struct": { "name": { "type": "alloc::string::String", "value": "Pickaxe" }, }, }, ], }, }, } ``` Aside from being really long and difficult to read, it also has a few "gotchas" that users need to be aware of if they want to edit the file manually. A major one is the requirement that you use the proper keys for a given type. For structs, you need `"struct"`. For lists, `"list"`. For tuple structs, `"tuple_struct"`. And so on. It also ***requires*** that the `"type"` entry come before the actual data. Despite being a map— which in programming is almost always orderless by default— the entries need to be in a particular order. Failure to follow the ordering convention results in a failure to deserialize the data. This makes it very prone to errors and annoyances. ## Solution Using #4042, we can remove a lot of the boilerplate and metadata needed by this older system. Since we now have static access to type information, we can simplify our serialized data to look like: ```rust // -- assets/inventory.ron { "my_game::inventory::Inventory": ( id: "inv001", max_storage: 10, items: [ ( name: "Pickaxe" ), ], ), } ``` This is much more digestible and a lot less error-prone (no more key requirements and no more extra type names). Additionally, it is a lot more familiar to users as it follows conventional serde mechanics. For example, the struct is represented with `(...)` when serialized to RON. #### Custom Serialization Additionally, this PR adds the opt-in ability to specify a custom serde implementation to be used rather than the one created via reflection. For example[^1]: ```rust // -- src/inventory.rs #[derive(Reflect, Serialize)] #[reflect(Serialize)] struct Item { #[serde(alias = "id")] name: String } ``` ```rust // -- assets/inventory.ron { "my_game::inventory::Inventory": ( id: "inv001", max_storage: 10, items: [ ( id: "Pickaxe" ), ], ), }, ``` By allowing users to define their own serialization methods, we do two things: 1. We give more control over how data is serialized/deserialized to the end user 2. We avoid having to re-define serde's attributes and forcing users to apply both (e.g. we don't need a `#[reflect(alias)]` attribute). ### Improved Formats One of the improvements this PR provides is the ability to represent data in ways that are more conventional and/or familiar to users. Many users are familiar with RON so here are some of the ways we can now represent data in RON: ###### Structs ```js { "my_crate::Foo": ( bar: 123 ) } // OR { "my_crate::Foo": Foo( bar: 123 ) } ``` <details> <summary>Old Format</summary> ```js { "type": "my_crate::Foo", "struct": { "bar": { "type": "usize", "value": 123 } } } ``` </details> ###### Tuples ```js { "(f32, f32)": (1.0, 2.0) } ``` <details> <summary>Old Format</summary> ```js { "type": "(f32, f32)", "tuple": [ { "type": "f32", "value": 1.0 }, { "type": "f32", "value": 2.0 } ] } ``` </details> ###### Tuple Structs ```js { "my_crate::Bar": ("Hello World!") } // OR { "my_crate::Bar": Bar("Hello World!") } ``` <details> <summary>Old Format</summary> ```js { "type": "my_crate::Bar", "tuple_struct": [ { "type": "alloc::string::String", "value": "Hello World!" } ] } ``` </details> ###### Arrays It may be a bit surprising to some, but arrays now also use the tuple format. This is because they essentially _are_ tuples (a sequence of values with a fixed size), but only allow for homogenous types. Additionally, this is how RON handles them and is probably a result of the 32-capacity limit imposed on them (both by [serde](https://docs.rs/serde/latest/serde/trait.Serialize.html#impl-Serialize-for-%5BT%3B%2032%5D) and by [bevy_reflect](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/reflect/trait.GetTypeRegistration.html#impl-GetTypeRegistration-for-%5BT%3B%2032%5D)). ```js { "[i32; 3]": (1, 2, 3) } ``` <details> <summary>Old Format</summary> ```js { "type": "[i32; 3]", "array": [ { "type": "i32", "value": 1 }, { "type": "i32", "value": 2 }, { "type": "i32", "value": 3 } ] } ``` </details> ###### Enums To make things simple, I'll just put a struct variant here, but the style applies to all variant types: ```js { "my_crate::ItemType": Consumable( name: "Healing potion" ) } ``` <details> <summary>Old Format</summary> ```js { "type": "my_crate::ItemType", "enum": { "variant": "Consumable", "struct": { "name": { "type": "alloc::string::String", "value": "Healing potion" } } } } ``` </details> ### Comparison with #4561 This PR is a rebased version of #4561. The reason for the split between the two is because this PR creates a _very_ different scene format. You may notice that the PR descriptions for either PR are pretty similar. This was done to better convey the changes depending on which (if any) gets merged first. If #4561 makes it in first, I will update this PR description accordingly. --- ## Changelog * Re-worked serialization/deserialization for reflected types * Added `TypedReflectDeserializer` for deserializing data with known `TypeInfo` * Renamed `ReflectDeserializer` to `UntypedReflectDeserializer` * ~~Replaced usages of `deserialize_any` with `deserialize_map` for non-self-describing formats~~ Reverted this change since there are still some issues that need to be sorted out (in a separate PR). By reverting this, crates like `bincode` can throw an error when attempting to deserialize non-self-describing formats (`bincode` results in `DeserializeAnyNotSupported`) * Structs, tuples, tuple structs, arrays, and enums are now all de/serialized using conventional serde methods ## Migration Guide * This PR reduces the verbosity of the scene format. Scenes will need to be updated accordingly: ```js // Old format { "type": "my_game::item::Item", "struct": { "id": { "type": "alloc::string::String", "value": "bevycraft:stone", }, "tags": { "type": "alloc::vec::Vec<alloc::string::String>", "list": [ { "type": "alloc::string::String", "value": "material" }, ], }, } // New format { "my_game::item::Item": ( id: "bevycraft:stone", tags: ["material"] ) } ``` [^1]: Some derives omitted for brevity. |
||
|
Maksymilian Mozolewski
|
ac1aebed5e |
Add reflect(skip_serializing) which retains reflection but disables automatic serialization (#5250)
# Objective - To address problems outlined in https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5245 ## Solution - Introduce `reflect(skip_serializing)` on top of `reflect(ignore)` which disables automatic serialisation to scenes, but does not disable reflection of the field. --- ## Changelog - Adds: - `bevy_reflect::serde::type_data` module - `SerializationData` structure for describing which fields are to be/not to be ignored, automatically registers as type_data for struct-based types - the `skip_serialization` flag for `#[reflect(...)]` - Removes: - ability to ignore Enum variants in serialization, since that didn't work anyway ## Migration Guide - Change `#[reflect(ignore)]` to `#[reflect(skip_serializing)]` where disabling reflection is not the intended effect. - Remove ignore/skip attributes from enum variants as these won't do anything anymore |
||
|
Gino Valente
|
15826d6019 |
bevy_reflect: Reflect enums (#4761)
# Objective
> This is a revival of #1347. Credit for the original PR should go to @Davier.
Currently, enums are treated as `ReflectRef::Value` types by `bevy_reflect`. Obviously, there needs to be better a better representation for enums using the reflection API.
## Solution
Based on prior work from @Davier, an `Enum` trait has been added as well as the ability to automatically implement it via the `Reflect` derive macro. This allows enums to be expressed dynamically:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
enum Foo {
A,
B(usize),
C { value: f32 },
}
let mut foo = Foo::B(123);
assert_eq!("B", foo.variant_name());
assert_eq!(1, foo.field_len());
let new_value = DynamicEnum::from(Foo::C { value: 1.23 });
foo.apply(&new_value);
assert_eq!(Foo::C{value: 1.23}, foo);
```
### Features
#### Derive Macro
Use the `#[derive(Reflect)]` macro to automatically implement the `Enum` trait for enum definitions. Optionally, you can use `#[reflect(ignore)]` with both variants and variant fields, just like you can with structs. These ignored items will not be considered as part of the reflection and cannot be accessed via reflection.
```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
enum TestEnum {
A,
// Uncomment to ignore all of `B`
// #[reflect(ignore)]
B(usize),
C {
// Uncomment to ignore only field `foo` of `C`
// #[reflect(ignore)]
foo: f32,
bar: bool,
},
}
```
#### Dynamic Enums
Enums may be created/represented dynamically via the `DynamicEnum` struct. The main purpose of this struct is to allow enums to be deserialized into a partial state and to allow dynamic patching. In order to ensure conversion from a `DynamicEnum` to a concrete enum type goes smoothly, be sure to add `FromReflect` to your derive macro.
```rust
let mut value = TestEnum::A;
// Create from a concrete instance
let dyn_enum = DynamicEnum::from(TestEnum::B(123));
value.apply(&dyn_enum);
assert_eq!(TestEnum::B(123), value);
// Create a purely dynamic instance
let dyn_enum = DynamicEnum::new("TestEnum", "A", ());
value.apply(&dyn_enum);
assert_eq!(TestEnum::A, value);
```
#### Variants
An enum value is always represented as one of its variants— never the enum in its entirety.
```rust
let value = TestEnum::A;
assert_eq!("A", value.variant_name());
// Since we are using the `A` variant, we cannot also be the `B` variant
assert_ne!("B", value.variant_name());
```
All variant types are representable within the `Enum` trait: unit, struct, and tuple.
You can get the current type like:
```rust
match value.variant_type() {
VariantType::Unit => println!("A unit variant!"),
VariantType::Struct => println!("A struct variant!"),
VariantType::Tuple => println!("A tuple variant!"),
}
```
> Notice that they don't contain any values representing the fields. These are purely tags.
If a variant has them, you can access the fields as well:
```rust
let mut value = TestEnum::C {
foo: 1.23,
bar: false
};
// Read/write specific fields
*value.field_mut("bar").unwrap() = true;
// Iterate over the entire collection of fields
for field in value.iter_fields() {
println!("{} = {:?}", field.name(), field.value());
}
```
#### Variant Swapping
It might seem odd to group all variant types under a single trait (why allow `iter_fields` on a unit variant?), but the reason this was done ~~is to easily allow *variant swapping*.~~ As I was recently drafting up the **Design Decisions** section, I discovered that other solutions could have been made to work with variant swapping. So while there are reasons to keep the all-in-one approach, variant swapping is _not_ one of them.
```rust
let mut value: Box<dyn Enum> = Box::new(TestEnum::A);
value.set(Box::new(TestEnum::B(123))).unwrap();
```
#### Serialization
Enums can be serialized and deserialized via reflection without needing to implement `Serialize` or `Deserialize` themselves (which can save thousands of lines of generated code). Below are the ways an enum can be serialized.
> Note, like the rest of reflection-based serialization, the order of the keys in these representations is important!
##### Unit
```json
{
"type": "my_crate::TestEnum",
"enum": {
"variant": "A"
}
}
```
##### Tuple
```json
{
"type": "my_crate::TestEnum",
"enum": {
"variant": "B",
"tuple": [
{
"type": "usize",
"value": 123
}
]
}
}
```
<details>
<summary>Effects on Option</summary>
This ends up making `Option` look a little ugly:
```json
{
"type": "core::option::Option<usize>",
"enum": {
"variant": "Some",
"tuple": [
{
"type": "usize",
"value": 123
}
]
}
}
```
</details>
##### Struct
```json
{
"type": "my_crate::TestEnum",
"enum": {
"variant": "C",
"struct": {
"foo": {
"type": "f32",
"value": 1.23
},
"bar": {
"type": "bool",
"value": false
}
}
}
}
```
## Design Decisions
<details>
<summary><strong>View Section</strong></summary>
This section is here to provide some context for why certain decisions were made for this PR, alternatives that could have been used instead, and what could be improved upon in the future.
### Variant Representation
One of the biggest decisions was to decide on how to represent variants. The current design uses a "all-in-one" design where unit, tuple, and struct variants are all simultaneously represented by the `Enum` trait. This is not the only way it could have been done, though.
#### Alternatives
##### 1. Variant Traits
One way of representing variants would be to define traits for each variant, implementing them whenever an enum featured at least one instance of them. This would allow us to define variants like:
```rust
pub trait Enum: Reflect {
fn variant(&self) -> Variant;
}
pub enum Variant<'a> {
Unit,
Tuple(&'a dyn TupleVariant),
Struct(&'a dyn StructVariant),
}
pub trait TupleVariant {
fn field_len(&self) -> usize;
// ...
}
```
And then do things like:
```rust
fn get_tuple_len(foo: &dyn Enum) -> usize {
match foo.variant() {
Variant::Tuple(tuple) => tuple.field_len(),
_ => panic!("not a tuple variant!")
}
}
```
The reason this PR does not go with this approach is because of the fact that variants are not separate types. In other words, we cannot implement traits on specific variants— these cover the *entire* enum. This means we offer an easy footgun:
```rust
let foo: Option<i32> = None;
let my_enum = Box::new(foo) as Box<dyn TupleVariant>;
```
Here, `my_enum` contains `foo`, which is a unit variant. However, since we need to implement `TupleVariant` for `Option` as a whole, it's possible to perform such a cast. This is obviously wrong, but could easily go unnoticed. So unfortunately, this makes it not a good candidate for representing variants.
##### 2. Variant Structs
To get around the issue of traits necessarily needing to apply to both the enum and its variants, we could instead use structs that are created on a per-variant basis. This was also considered but was ultimately [[removed](
|
||
|
MrGVSV
|
3d8d922566 |
bevy_reflect_derive: Tidying up the code (#4712)
# Objective The `bevy_reflect_derive` crate is not the cleanest or easiest to follow/maintain. The `lib.rs` file is especially difficult with over 1000 lines of code written in a confusing order. This is just a result of growth within the crate and it would be nice to clean it up for future work. ## Solution Split `bevy_reflect_derive` into many more submodules. The submodules include: * `container_attributes` - Code relating to container attributes * `derive_data` - Code relating to reflection-based derive metadata * `field_attributes` - Code relating to field attributes * `impls` - Code containing actual reflection implementations * `reflect_value` - Code relating to reflection-based value metadata * `registration` - Code relating to type registration * `utility` - General-purpose utility functions This leaves the `lib.rs` file to contain only the public macros, making it much easier to digest (and fewer than 200 lines). By breaking up the code into smaller modules, we make it easier for future contributors to find the code they're looking for or identify which module best fits their own additions. ### Metadata Structs This cleanup also adds two big metadata structs: `ReflectFieldAttr` and `ReflectDeriveData`. The former is used to store all attributes for a struct field (if any). The latter is used to store all metadata for struct-based derive inputs. Both significantly reduce code duplication and make editing these macros much simpler. The tradeoff is that we may collect more metadata than needed. However, this is usually a small thing (such as checking for attributes when they're not really needed or creating a `ReflectFieldAttr` for every field regardless of whether they actually have an attribute). We could try to remove these tradeoffs and squeeze some more performance out, but doing so might come at the cost of developer experience. Personally, I think it's much nicer to create a `ReflectFieldAttr` for every field since it means I don't have to do two `Option` checks. Others may disagree, though, and so we can discuss changing this either in this PR or in a future one. ### Out of Scope _Some_ documentation has been added or improved, but ultimately good docs are probably best saved for a dedicated PR. ## 🔍 Focus Points (for reviewers) I know it's a lot to sift through, so here is a list of **key points for reviewers**: - The following files contain code that was mostly just relocated: - `reflect_value.rs` - `registration.rs` - `container_attributes.rs` was also mostly moved but features some general cleanup (reducing nesting, removing hardcoded strings, etc.) and lots of doc comments - Most impl logic was moved from `lib.rs` to `impls.rs`, but they have been significantly modified to use the new `ReflectDeriveData` metadata struct in order to reduce duplication. - `derive_data.rs` and `field_attributes.rs` contain almost entirely new code and should probably be given the most attention. - Likewise, `from_reflect.rs` saw major changes using `ReflectDeriveData` so it should also be given focus. - There was no change to the `lib.rs` exports so the end-user API should be the same. ## Prior Work This task was initially tackled by @NathanSWard in #2377 (which was closed in favor of this PR), so hats off to them for beating me to the punch by nearly a year! --- ## Changelog * **[INTERNAL]** Split `bevy_reflect_derive` into smaller submodules * **[INTERNAL]** Add `ReflectFieldAttr` * **[INTERNAL]** Add `ReflectDeriveData` * Add `BevyManifest::get_path_direct()` method (`bevy_macro_utils`) Co-authored-by: MrGVSV <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com> |