# Objective
- The usage of ComponentId is quite confusing: events are not
components. By newtyping this, we can prevent stupid mistakes, avoid
leaking internal details and make the code clearer for users and engine
devs reading it.
- Adopts https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/19755
---------
Co-authored-by: oscar-benderstone <oscarbenderstone@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oscar Bender-Stone <88625129+oscar-benderstone@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Fixes#18726
Alternative to and closes#18797
## Solution
Create a method `Observer::system_name` to expose the name of the
`Observer`'s system
## Showcase
```rust
// Returns `my_crate::my_observer`
let observer = Observer::new(my_observer);
println!(observer.system_name());
// Returns `my_crate::method::{{closure}}`
let observer = Observer::new(|_trigger: Trigger<...>|);
println!(observer.system_name());
// Returns `custom_name`
let observer = Observer::new(IntoSystem::into_system(my_observer).with_name("custom_name"));
println!(observer.system_name());
```
## TODO
- [ ] Achieve cart's approval
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Getting access to the original target of an entity-event is really
helpful when working with bubbled / propagated events.
`bevy_picking` special-cases this, but users have requested this for all
sorts of bubbled events.
The existing naming convention was also very confusing. Fixes
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17112, but also see #18982.
## Solution
1. Rename `ObserverTrigger::target` -> `current_target`.
1. Store `original_target: Option<Entity>` in `ObserverTrigger`.
1. Wire it up so this field gets set correctly.
1. Remove the `target` field on the `Pointer` events from
`bevy_picking`.
Closes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/18710, which attempted
the same thing. Thanks @emfax!
## Testing
I've modified an existing test to check that the entities returned
during event bubbling / propagation are correct.
## Notes to reviewers
It's a little weird / sad that you can no longer access this infromation
via the buffered events for `Pointer`. That said, you already couldn't
access any bubbled target. We should probably remove the `BufferedEvent`
form of `Pointer` to reduce confusion and overhead, but I didn't want to
do so here.
Observer events can be trivially converted into buffered events (write
an observer with an EventWriter), and I suspect that that is the better
migration if you want the controllable timing or performance
characteristics of buffered events for your specific use case.
## Future work
It would be nice to not store this data at all (and not expose any
methods) if propagation was disabled. That involves more trait
shuffling, and I don't think we should do it here for reviewability.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joona Aalto <jondolf.dev@gmail.com>
# Objective
Currently, the observer API looks like this:
```rust
app.add_observer(|trigger: Trigger<Explode>| {
info!("Entity {} exploded!", trigger.target());
});
```
Future plans for observers also include "multi-event observers" with a
trigger that looks like this (see [Cart's
example](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14649#issuecomment-2960402508)):
```rust
trigger: Trigger<(
OnAdd<Pressed>,
OnRemove<Pressed>,
OnAdd<InteractionDisabled>,
OnRemove<InteractionDisabled>,
OnInsert<Hovered>,
)>,
```
In scenarios like this, there is a lot of repetition of `On`. These are
expected to be very high-traffic APIs especially in UI contexts, so
ergonomics and readability are critical.
By renaming `Trigger` to `On`, we can make these APIs read more cleanly
and get rid of the repetition:
```rust
app.add_observer(|trigger: On<Explode>| {
info!("Entity {} exploded!", trigger.target());
});
```
```rust
trigger: On<(
Add<Pressed>,
Remove<Pressed>,
Add<InteractionDisabled>,
Remove<InteractionDisabled>,
Insert<Hovered>,
)>,
```
Names like `On<Add<Pressed>>` emphasize the actual event listener nature
more than `Trigger<OnAdd<Pressed>>`, and look cleaner. This *also* frees
up the `Trigger` name if we want to use it for the observer event type,
splitting them out from buffered events (bikeshedding this is out of
scope for this PR though).
For prior art:
[`bevy_eventlistener`](https://github.com/aevyrie/bevy_eventlistener)
used
[`On`](https://docs.rs/bevy_eventlistener/latest/bevy_eventlistener/event_listener/struct.On.html)
for its event listener type. Though in our case, the observer is the
event listener, and `On` is just a type containing information about the
triggered event.
## Solution
Steal from `bevy_event_listener` by @aevyrie and use `On`.
- Rename `Trigger` to `On`
- Rename `OnAdd` to `Add`
- Rename `OnInsert` to `Insert`
- Rename `OnReplace` to `Replace`
- Rename `OnRemove` to `Remove`
- Rename `OnDespawn` to `Despawn`
## Discussion
### Naming Conflicts??
Using a name like `Add` might initially feel like a very bad idea, since
it risks conflict with `core::ops::Add`. However, I don't expect this to
be a big problem in practice.
- You rarely need to actually implement the `Add` trait, especially in
modules that would use the Bevy ECS.
- In the rare cases where you *do* get a conflict, it is very easy to
fix by just disambiguating, for example using `ops::Add`.
- The `Add` event is a struct while the `Add` trait is a trait (duh), so
the compiler error should be very obvious.
For the record, renaming `OnAdd` to `Add`, I got exactly *zero* errors
or conflicts within Bevy itself. But this is of course not entirely
representative of actual projects *using* Bevy.
You might then wonder, why not use `Added`? This would conflict with the
`Added` query filter, so it wouldn't work. Additionally, the current
naming convention for observer events does not use past tense.
### Documentation
This does make documentation slightly more awkward when referring to
`On` or its methods. Previous docs often referred to `Trigger::target`
or "sends a `Trigger`" (which is... a bit strange anyway), which would
now be `On::target` and "sends an observer `Event`".
You can see the diff in this PR to see some of the effects. I think it
should be fine though, we may just need to reword more documentation to
read better.
