# Objective
- Fix issue where `SubStates` depending on multiple source states would
only react when _all_ source states changed simultaneously.
- SubStates should be created/destroyed whenever _any_ of their source
states transitions, not only when all change together.
# Solution
- Changed the "did parent change" detection logic from AND to OR. We
need to check if _any_ of the event readers changed, not if _all_ of
them changed.
- See
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/actions/runs/15610159742/job/43968937544?pr=19595
for failing test proof before I pushed the fix.
- The generated code we want needs `||`s not `&&`s like this:
```rust
fn register_sub_state_systems_in_schedule<T: SubStates<SourceStates = Self>>(schedule: &mut Schedule) {
let apply_state_transition = |(mut ereader0, mut ereader1, mut ereader2): (
EventReader<StateTransitionEvent<S0::RawState>>,
EventReader<StateTransitionEvent<S1::RawState>>,
EventReader<StateTransitionEvent<S2::RawState>>,
),
event: EventWriter<StateTransitionEvent<T>>,
commands: Commands,
current_state_res: Option<ResMut<State<T>>>,
next_state_res: Option<ResMut<NextState<T>>>,
(s0, s1, s2): (
Option<Res<State<S0::RawState>>>,
Option<Res<State<S1::RawState>>>,
Option<Res<State<S2::RawState>>>,
)| {
// With `||` we can correctly count parent changed if any of the sources changed.
let parent_changed = (ereader0.read().last().is_some()
|| ereader1.read().last().is_some()
|| ereader2.read().last().is_some());
let next_state = take_next_state(next_state_res);
if !parent_changed && next_state.is_none() {
return;
}
// ...
}
}
```
# Testing
- Add new test.
- Check the fix worked in my game.
This pr uses the `extern crate self as` trick to make proc macros behave
the same way inside and outside bevy.
# Objective
- Removes noise introduced by `crate as` in the whole bevy repo.
- Fixes#17004.
- Hardens proc macro path resolution.
## TODO
- [x] `BevyManifest` needs cleanup.
- [x] Cleanup remaining `crate as`.
- [x] Add proper integration tests to the ci.
## Notes
- `cargo-manifest-proc-macros` is written by me and based/inspired by
the old `BevyManifest` implementation and
[`bkchr/proc-macro-crate`](https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate).
- What do you think about the new integration test machinery I added to
the `ci`?
More and better integration tests can be added at a later stage.
The goal of these integration tests is to simulate an actual separate
crate that uses bevy. Ideally they would lightly touch all bevy crates.
## Testing
- Needs RA test
- Needs testing from other users
- Others need to run at least `cargo run -p ci integration-test` and
verify that they work.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Background
In `no_std` compatible crates, there is often an `std` feature which
will allow access to the standard library. Currently, with the `std`
feature _enabled_, the
[`std::prelude`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/prelude/index.html) is
implicitly imported in all modules. With the feature _disabled_, instead
the [`core::prelude`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/prelude/index.html)
is implicitly imported. This creates a subtle and pervasive issue where
`alloc` items _may_ be implicitly included (if `std` is enabled), or
must be explicitly included (if `std` is not enabled).
# Objective
- Make the implicit imports for `no_std` crates consistent regardless of
what features are/not enabled.
## Solution
- Replace the `cfg_attr` "double negative" `no_std` attribute with
conditional compilation to _include_ `std` as an external crate.
```rust
// Before
#![cfg_attr(not(feature = "std"), no_std)]
// After
#![no_std]
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
extern crate std;
```
- Fix imports that are currently broken but are only now visible with
the above fix.
## Testing
- CI
## Notes
I had previously used the "double negative" version of `no_std` based on
general consensus that it was "cleaner" within the Rust embedded
community. However, this implicit prelude issue likely was considered
when forming this consensus. I believe the reason why is the items most
affected by this issue are provided by the `alloc` crate, which is
rarely used within embedded but extensively used within Bevy.
# Objective
Fixes#13711
## Solution
Introduce smaller, generic system sets for each schedule variant, which
are ordered against other generic variants:
- `ExitSchedules<S>` - For `OnExit` schedules, runs from leaf states to
root states.
- `TransitionSchedules<S>` - For `OnTransition` schedules, runs in
arbitrary order.
- `EnterSchedules<S>` - For `OnEnter` schedules, runs from root states
to leaf states.
Also unified `ApplyStateTransition<S>` schedule which works in basically
the same way, just for internals.
## Testing
- One test that tests schedule execution order
---------
Co-authored-by: Lee-Orr <lee-orr@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- `bevy_state_macros` is a new crate added in the 0.14
- it already exists outside of the bevy org:
https://crates.io/crates/bevy_state_macros
## Solution
- Rename the crate
# Objective
This PR addresses one of the issues from [discord state
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1237949214017716356).
Same-state transitions can be desirable, so there should exist a hook
for them.
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/9130.
## Solution
- Allow `StateTransitionEvent<S>` to contain identity transitions.
- Ignore identity transitions at schedule running level (`OnExit`,
`OnTransition`, `OnEnter`).
- Propagate identity transitions through `SubStates` and
`ComputedStates`.
- Add example about registering custom transition schedules.
## Changelog
- `StateTransitionEvent<S>` can be emitted with same `exited` and
`entered` state.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
adopted from #10716
adds example for updating state
---------
Co-authored-by: Stepan Koltsov <stepan.koltsov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Extracts the state mechanisms into a new crate called "bevy_state".
This comes with a few goals:
- state wasn't really an inherent machinery of the ecs system, and so
keeping it within bevy_ecs felt forced
- by mixing it in with bevy_ecs, the maintainability of our more robust
state system was significantly compromised
moving state into a new crate makes it easier to encapsulate as it's own
feature, and easier to read and understand since it's no longer a
single, massive file.
## Solution
move the state-related elements from bevy_ecs to a new crate
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how? all the automated tests
migrated and passed, ran the pre-existing examples without changes to
validate.
---
## Migration Guide
Since bevy_state is now gated behind the `bevy_state` feature, projects
that use state but don't use the `default-features` will need to add
that feature flag.
Since it is no longer part of bevy_ecs, projects that use bevy_ecs
directly will need to manually pull in `bevy_state`, trigger the
StateTransition schedule, and handle any of the elements that bevy_app
currently sets up.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kristoffer Søholm <k.soeholm@gmail.com>
