## Objective
Add a test that reproduces #11111 (and partially #18267). The bug is
that asset loader settings are effectively ignored if the same asset is
loaded multiple times with different settings.
## Solution
Add a unit test to `bevy_assets/lib.rs`. The test will be marked as
`#[ignore]` until #11111 is fixed.
```rust
// Load the same asset with different settings.
let handle_1 = load(asset_server, "test.u8", 1);
let handle_2 = load(asset_server, "test.u8", 2);
// Handles should be different.
assert_ne!(handle_1, handle_2);
```
## Concerns
I'm not 100% sure that the current behaviour is actually broken - I
can't see anything in the asset system design docs that explicitly says
different settings should create different asset ids.
UPDATE: Sentiment from issue comments and discord varies between "bug"
and "undesirable consequence of design decisions, alternatives should be
explored". So I've concluded that the test is valid and desirable.
## Testing
```sh
cargo test -p bevy_asset --features multi_threaded
# Or to repro the issue:
cargo test -p bevy_asset --features multi_threaded -- --ignored
```
# Objective
- Notice a word duplication typo
- Small quest to fix similar or nearby typos with my faithful companion
`\b(\w+)\s+\1\b`
## Solution
Fix em
# Objective
Fixes a part of #14274.
Bevy has an incredibly inconsistent naming convention for its system
sets, both internally and across the ecosystem.
<img alt="System sets in Bevy"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d16e2027-793f-4ba4-9cc9-e780b14a5a1b"
width="450" />
*Names of public system set types in Bevy*
Most Bevy types use a naming of `FooSystem` or just `Foo`, but there are
also a few `FooSystems` and `FooSet` types. In ecosystem crates on the
other hand, `FooSet` is perhaps the most commonly used name in general.
Conventions being so wildly inconsistent can make it harder for users to
pick names for their own types, to search for system sets on docs.rs, or
to even discern which types *are* system sets.
To reign in the inconsistency a bit and help unify the ecosystem, it
would be good to establish a common recommended naming convention for
system sets in Bevy itself, similar to how plugins are commonly suffixed
with `Plugin` (ex: `TimePlugin`). By adopting a consistent naming
convention in first-party Bevy, we can softly nudge ecosystem crates to
follow suit (for types where it makes sense to do so).
Choosing a naming convention is also relevant now, as the [`bevy_cli`
recently adopted
lints](https://github.com/TheBevyFlock/bevy_cli/pull/345) to enforce
naming for plugins and system sets, and the recommended naming used for
system sets is still a bit open.
## Which Name To Use?
Now the contentious part: what naming convention should we actually
adopt?
This was discussed on the Bevy Discord at the end of last year, starting
[here](<https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1310659954683936789>).
`FooSet` and `FooSystems` were the clear favorites, with `FooSet` very
narrowly winning an unofficial poll. However, it seems to me like the
consensus was broadly moving towards `FooSystems` at the end and after
the poll, with Cart
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311140204974706708))
and later Alice
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311092530732859533))
and also me being in favor of it.
Let's do a quick pros and cons list! Of course these are just what I
thought of, so take it with a grain of salt.
`FooSet`:
- Pro: Nice and short!
- Pro: Used by many ecosystem crates.
- Pro: The `Set` suffix comes directly from the trait name `SystemSet`.
- Pro: Pairs nicely with existing APIs like `in_set` and
`configure_sets`.
- Con: `Set` by itself doesn't actually indicate that it's related to
systems *at all*, apart from the implemented trait. A set of what?
- Con: Is `FooSet` a set of `Foo`s or a system set related to `Foo`? Ex:
`ContactSet`, `MeshSet`, `EnemySet`...
`FooSystems`:
- Pro: Very clearly indicates that the type represents a collection of
systems. The actual core concept, system(s), is in the name.
- Pro: Parallels nicely with `FooPlugins` for plugin groups.
- Pro: Low risk of conflicts with other names or misunderstandings about
what the type is.
- Pro: In most cases, reads *very* nicely and clearly. Ex:
`PhysicsSystems` and `AnimationSystems` as opposed to `PhysicsSet` and
`AnimationSet`.
- Pro: Easy to search for on docs.rs.
- Con: Usually results in longer names.
- Con: Not yet as widely used.
Really the big problem with `FooSet` is that it doesn't actually
describe what it is. It describes what *kind of thing* it is (a set of
something), but not *what it is a set of*, unless you know the type or
check its docs or implemented traits. `FooSystems` on the other hand is
much more self-descriptive in this regard, at the cost of being a bit
longer to type.
Ultimately, in some ways it comes down to preference and how you think
of system sets. Personally, I was originally in favor of `FooSet`, but
have been increasingly on the side of `FooSystems`, especially after
seeing what the new names would actually look like in Avian and now
Bevy. I prefer it because it usually reads better, is much more clearly
related to groups of systems than `FooSet`, and overall *feels* more
correct and natural to me in the long term.
For these reasons, and because Alice and Cart also seemed to share a
preference for it when it was previously being discussed, I propose that
we adopt a `FooSystems` naming convention where applicable.
## Solution
Rename Bevy's system set types to use a consistent `FooSet` naming where
applicable.
- `AccessibilitySystem` → `AccessibilitySystems`
- `GizmoRenderSystem` → `GizmoRenderSystems`
- `PickSet` → `PickingSystems`
- `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` → `RunFixedMainLoopSystems`
- `TransformSystem` → `TransformSystems`
- `RemoteSet` → `RemoteSystems`
- `RenderSet` → `RenderSystems`
- `SpriteSystem` → `SpriteSystems`
- `StateTransitionSteps` → `StateTransitionSystems`
- `RenderUiSystem` → `RenderUiSystems`
- `UiSystem` → `UiSystems`
- `Animation` → `AnimationSystems`
- `AssetEvents` → `AssetEventSystems`
- `TrackAssets` → `AssetTrackingSystems`
- `UpdateGizmoMeshes` → `GizmoMeshSystems`
- `InputSystem` → `InputSystems`
- `InputFocusSet` → `InputFocusSystems`
- `ExtractMaterialsSet` → `MaterialExtractionSystems`
- `ExtractMeshesSet` → `MeshExtractionSystems`
- `RumbleSystem` → `RumbleSystems`
- `CameraUpdateSystem` → `CameraUpdateSystems`
- `ExtractAssetsSet` → `AssetExtractionSystems`
- `Update2dText` → `Text2dUpdateSystems`
- `TimeSystem` → `TimeSystems`
- `AudioPlaySet` → `AudioPlaybackSystems`
- `SendEvents` → `EventSenderSystems`
- `EventUpdates` → `EventUpdateSystems`
A lot of the names got slightly longer, but they are also a lot more
consistent, and in my opinion the majority of them read much better. For
a few of the names I took the liberty of rewording things a bit;
definitely open to any further naming improvements.
There are still also cases where the `FooSystems` naming doesn't really
make sense, and those I left alone. This primarily includes system sets
like `Interned<dyn SystemSet>`, `EnterSchedules<S>`, `ExitSchedules<S>`,
or `TransitionSchedules<S>`, where the type has some special purpose and
semantics.
## Todo
- [x] Should I keep all the old names as deprecated type aliases? I can
do this, but to avoid wasting work I'd prefer to first reach consensus
on whether these renames are even desired.
- [x] Migration guide
- [x] Release notes
# Objective
- Contributes to #18978
## Solution
- Disable default features on all dependencies in `bevy_asset` and
explicitly enable ones that are required.
- Remove `compile_error` caused by enabling `file_watcher` without
`multi_threaded` by including `multi_threaded` in `file_watcher`.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Notes
No breaking changes here, just a little cleaning before the more
controversial changes for `no_std` support.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
# Objective
The goal of `bevy_platform_support` is to provide a set of platform
agnostic APIs, alongside platform-specific functionality. This is a high
traffic crate (providing things like HashMap and Instant). Especially in
light of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/18799, it
deserves a friendlier / shorter name.
Given that it hasn't had a full release yet, getting this change in
before Bevy 0.16 makes sense.
## Solution
- Rename `bevy_platform_support` to `bevy_platform`.
# Objective
- the bevy workspace fails to publish
```
Packaging bevy_asset v0.16.0-dev (/home/runner/work/bevy-releasability/bevy-releasability/crates/bevy_asset)
Updating crates.io index
Updating `kellnr` index
error: failed to prepare local package for uploading
Caused by:
no matching package named `bevy_log` found
location searched: `kellnr` index
required by package `bevy_asset v0.16.0-dev (/home/runner/work/bevy-releasability/bevy-releasability/crates/bevy_asset)`
```
-
https://github.com/TheBevyFlock/bevy-releasability/actions/runs/14153238476/job/39649160443
## Solution
- Remove bevy_log dev-dependency from bevy_asset
- Not sure of why this is a problem, but the dev-dependency is not
really needed so... 🤷
# Objective
- Fixes#18010.
## Solution
- Revert the offending PRs! These are #15481 and #18013. We now no
longer get an error if there are duplicate subassets.
- In theory we could untangle #18013 from #15481, but that may be
tricky, and may still introduce regressions. To avoid this worry (since
we're already in RC mode), I am just reverting both.
## Testing
- This is just a revert.
---
## Migration Guide
<Remove the migration guides for #15481 and #18013>
I will make a PR to the bevy_website repo after this is merged.
# Objective
- Prevents #18291.
- Previously, attempting to direct-nested-load a subasset would return
the root of the nested-loaded asset. This is most problematic when doing
direct-nested-**untyped**-loads of subassets, where you may not even
realize you're dealing with the entirely wrong asset (at least with
typed loads, *most of the time* the root asset has a different type from
the subasset, and so at least you'd get an error that the types don't
match).
## Solution
- We now return an error when doing these kinds of loads.
Note an alternative would be to "solve" this problem, by just looking up
the appropriate subasset after doing the nested load. However there's
two problems: 1) we don't know which subassets of the root asset are
necessary for the subasset we are looking up (so any handles in that
subasset may never get registered), 2) a solution will likely hamper
attempts to resolve#18010. AFAICT, no one has complained about this
issue, so it doesn't seem critical to fix this for now.
## Testing
- Added a test to ensure this returns an error. I also checked that the
error before this was just a mismatched type error, meaning it was
trying to pass off the root asset type `CoolText` as the subasset type
`SubText` (which would have worked had I not been using typed loads).
# Objective
Prevents duplicate implementation between IntoSystemConfigs and
IntoSystemSetConfigs using a generic, adds a NodeType trait for more
config flexibility (opening the door to implement
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14195?).
## Solution
Followed writeup by @ItsDoot:
https://hackmd.io/@doot/rJeefFHc1x
Removes IntoSystemConfigs and IntoSystemSetConfigs, instead using
IntoNodeConfigs with generics.
## Testing
Pending
---
## Showcase
N/A
## Migration Guide
SystemSetConfigs -> NodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet>
SystemConfigs -> NodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem>
IntoSystemSetConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet, M>
IntoSystemConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem, M>
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Makes #18010 more easily debuggable. This doesn't solve that issue,
but protects us from it in the future.
## Solution
- Make `LoadContext::add_labeled_asset` and friends return an error if
it finds a duplicate asset.
## Testing
- Added a test - it fails before the fix.
---
## Migration Guide
- `AssetLoader`s must now handle the case of a duplicate subasset label
when using `LoadContext::add_labeled_asset` and its variants. If you
know your subasset labels are unique by construction (e.g., they include
an index number), you can simply unwrap this result.
# Objective
- Fixes#17960
## Solution
- Followed the [edition upgrade
guide](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/editions/transitioning-an-existing-project-to-a-new-edition.html)
## Testing
- CI
---
## Summary of Changes
### Documentation Indentation
When using lists in documentation, proper indentation is now linted for.
This means subsequent lines within the same list item must start at the
same indentation level as the item.
```rust
/* Valid */
/// - Item 1
/// Run-on sentence.
/// - Item 2
struct Foo;
/* Invalid */
/// - Item 1
/// Run-on sentence.
/// - Item 2
struct Foo;
```
### Implicit `!` to `()` Conversion
`!` (the never return type, returned by `panic!`, etc.) no longer
implicitly converts to `()`. This is particularly painful for systems
with `todo!` or `panic!` statements, as they will no longer be functions
returning `()` (or `Result<()>`), making them invalid systems for
functions like `add_systems`. The ideal fix would be to accept functions
returning `!` (or rather, _not_ returning), but this is blocked on the
[stabilisation of the `!` type
itself](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.never.html), which is
not done.
The "simple" fix would be to add an explicit `-> ()` to system
signatures (e.g., `|| { todo!() }` becomes `|| -> () { todo!() }`).
However, this is _also_ banned, as there is an existing lint which (IMO,
incorrectly) marks this as an unnecessary annotation.
So, the "fix" (read: workaround) is to put these kinds of `|| -> ! { ...
}` closuers into variables and give the variable an explicit type (e.g.,
`fn()`).
```rust
// Valid
let system: fn() = || todo!("Not implemented yet!");
app.add_systems(..., system);
// Invalid
app.add_systems(..., || todo!("Not implemented yet!"));
```
### Temporary Variable Lifetimes
The order in which temporary variables are dropped has changed. The
simple fix here is _usually_ to just assign temporaries to a named
variable before use.
### `gen` is a keyword
We can no longer use the name `gen` as it is reserved for a future
generator syntax. This involved replacing uses of the name `gen` with
`r#gen` (the raw-identifier syntax).
### Formatting has changed
Use statements have had the order of imports changed, causing a
substantial +/-3,000 diff when applied. For now, I have opted-out of
this change by amending `rustfmt.toml`
```toml
style_edition = "2021"
```
This preserves the original formatting for now, reducing the size of
this PR. It would be a simple followup to update this to 2024 and run
`cargo fmt`.
### New `use<>` Opt-Out Syntax
Lifetimes are now implicitly included in RPIT types. There was a handful
of instances where it needed to be added to satisfy the borrow checker,
but there may be more cases where it _should_ be added to avoid
breakages in user code.
### `MyUnitStruct { .. }` is an invalid pattern
Previously, you could match against unit structs (and unit enum
variants) with a `{ .. }` destructuring. This is no longer valid.
### Pretty much every use of `ref` and `mut` are gone
Pattern binding has changed to the point where these terms are largely
unused now. They still serve a purpose, but it is far more niche now.
### `iter::repeat(...).take(...)` is bad
New lint recommends using the more explicit `iter::repeat_n(..., ...)`
instead.
## Migration Guide
The lifetimes of functions using return-position impl-trait (RPIT) are
likely _more_ conservative than they had been previously. If you
encounter lifetime issues with such a function, please create an issue
to investigate the addition of `+ use<...>`.
## Notes
- Check the individual commits for a clearer breakdown for what
_actually_ changed.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
Fixes#15417.
## Solution
- Remove the `labeled_assets` fields from `LoadedAsset` and
`ErasedLoadedAsset`.
- Created new structs `CompleteLoadedAsset` and
`CompleteErasedLoadedAsset` to hold the `labeled_subassets`.
- When a subasset is `LoadContext::finish`ed, it produces a
`CompleteLoadedAsset`.
- When a `CompleteLoadedAsset` is added to a `LoadContext` (as a
subasset), their `labeled_assets` are merged, reporting any overlaps.
One important detail to note: nested subassets with overlapping names
could in theory have been used in the past for the purposes of asset
preprocessing. Even though there was no way to access these "shadowed"
nested subassets, asset preprocessing does get access to these nested
subassets. This does not seem like a case we should support though. It
is confusing at best.
## Testing
- This is just a refactor.
---
## Migration Guide
- Most uses of `LoadedAsset` and `ErasedLoadedAsset` should be replaced
with `CompleteLoadedAsset` and `CompleteErasedLoadedAsset` respectively.
This pr uses the `extern crate self as` trick to make proc macros behave
the same way inside and outside bevy.
# Objective
- Removes noise introduced by `crate as` in the whole bevy repo.
- Fixes#17004.
- Hardens proc macro path resolution.
## TODO
- [x] `BevyManifest` needs cleanup.
- [x] Cleanup remaining `crate as`.
- [x] Add proper integration tests to the ci.
## Notes
- `cargo-manifest-proc-macros` is written by me and based/inspired by
the old `BevyManifest` implementation and
[`bkchr/proc-macro-crate`](https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate).
- What do you think about the new integration test machinery I added to
the `ci`?
More and better integration tests can be added at a later stage.
The goal of these integration tests is to simulate an actual separate
crate that uses bevy. Ideally they would lightly touch all bevy crates.
## Testing
- Needs RA test
- Needs testing from other users
- Others need to run at least `cargo run -p ci integration-test` and
verify that they work.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- A common bevy pattern is to pre-allocate a weak `Handle` with a
static, random ID and fill it during `Plugin::build` via
`load_internal_asset!`
- This requires generating a random 128-bit number that is interpreted
as a UUID. This is much less convenient than generating a UUID directly,
and also, strictly speaking, error prone, since it often results in an
invalid UUIDv4 – they have to follow the pattern
`xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx`, where `x` is a random nibble (in
practice this doesn't matter, since the UUID is just interpreted as a
bag of bytes).
## Solution
- Add a `weak_handle!` macro that internally calls
[`uuid::uuid!`](https://docs.rs/uuid/1.12.0/uuid/macro.uuid.html) to
parse a UUID from a string literal.
- Now any random UUID generation tool can be used to generate an asset
ID, such as `uuidgen` or entering "uuid" in DuckDuckGo.
Previously:
```rust
const SHADER: Handle<Shader> = Handle::weak_from_u128(314685653797097581405914117016993910609);
```
After this PR:
```rust
const SHADER: Handle<Shader> = weak_handle!("1347c9b7-c46a-48e7-b7b8-023a354b7cac");
```
Note that I did not yet migrate any of the existing uses. I can do that
if desired, but want to have some feedback first to avoid wasted effort.
## Testing
Tested via the included doctest.
# Cold Specialization
## Objective
An ongoing part of our quest to retain everything in the render world,
cold-specialization aims to cache pipeline specialization so that
pipeline IDs can be recomputed only when necessary, rather than every
frame. This approach reduces redundant work in stable scenes, while
still accommodating scenarios in which materials, views, or visibility
might change, as well as unlocking future optimization work like
retaining render bins.
## Solution
Queue systems are split into a specialization system and queue system,
the former of which only runs when necessary to compute a new pipeline
id. Pipelines are invalidated using a combination of change detection
and ECS ticks.
### The difficulty with change detection
Detecting “what changed” can be tricky because pipeline specialization
depends not only on the entity’s components (e.g., mesh, material, etc.)
but also on which view (camera) it is rendering in. In other words, the
cache key for a given pipeline id is a view entity/render entity pair.
As such, it's not sufficient simply to react to change detection in
order to specialize -- an entity could currently be out of view or could
be rendered in the future in camera that is currently disabled or hasn't
spawned yet.
### Why ticks?
Ticks allow us to ensure correctness by allowing us to compare the last
time a view or entity was updated compared to the cached pipeline id.
This ensures that even if an entity was out of view or has never been
seen in a given camera before we can still correctly determine whether
it needs to be re-specialized or not.
## Testing
TODO: Tested a bunch of different examples, need to test more.
## Migration Guide
TODO
- `AssetEvents` has been moved into the `PostUpdate` schedule.
---------
Co-authored-by: Patrick Walton <pcwalton@mimiga.net>
# Objective
- Contributes to #16877
## Solution
- Moved `hashbrown`, `foldhash`, and related types out of `bevy_utils`
and into `bevy_platform_support`
- Refactored the above to match the layout of these types in `std`.
- Updated crates as required.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
- The following items were moved out of `bevy_utils` and into
`bevy_platform_support::hash`:
- `FixedState`
- `DefaultHasher`
- `RandomState`
- `FixedHasher`
- `Hashed`
- `PassHash`
- `PassHasher`
- `NoOpHash`
- The following items were moved out of `bevy_utils` and into
`bevy_platform_support::collections`:
- `HashMap`
- `HashSet`
- `bevy_utils::hashbrown` has been removed. Instead, import from
`bevy_platform_support::collections` _or_ take a dependency on
`hashbrown` directly.
- `bevy_utils::Entry` has been removed. Instead, import from
`bevy_platform_support::collections::hash_map` or
`bevy_platform_support::collections::hash_set` as appropriate.
- All of the above equally apply to `bevy::utils` and
`bevy::platform_support`.
## Notes
- I left `PreHashMap`, `PreHashMapExt`, and `TypeIdMap` in `bevy_utils`
as they might be candidates for micro-crating. They can always be moved
into `bevy_platform_support` at a later date if desired.
Makes use of `std` explicit, simplifying a possible `no_std` port.
# Objective
- Contributes to #15460
- Simplify future `no_std` work on `bevy_asset`
## Solution
- Add `#![no_std]` to switch to `core::prelude` instead of
`std::prelude`
## Testing
- CI
---
## Notes
This is entirely a change around the names of imports and has no impact
on functionality. This just reduces the quantity of changes involved in
the (likely more controversial) `no_std`-ification of `bevy_asset`.
# Objective
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111
## Solution
Move `#![warn(clippy::allow_attributes,
clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason)]` to the workspace `Cargo.toml`
## Testing
Lots of CI testing, and local testing too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
# Objective
I realized that setting these to `deny` may have been a little
aggressive - especially since we upgrade warnings to denies in CI.
## Solution
Downgrades these lints to `warn`, so that compiles can work locally. CI
will still treat these as denies.
# Objective
- https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111
## Solution
Set the `clippy::allow_attributes` and
`clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason` lints to `deny`, and bring
`bevy_asset` in line with the new restrictions.
No code changes have been made - except if a lint that was previously
`allow(...)`'d could be removed via small code changes. For example,
`unused_variables` can be handled by adding a `_` to the beginning of a
field's name.
## Testing
`cargo clippy` and `cargo test --package bevy_asset --features
multi_threaded` were run, and no errors were encountered.
# Objective
- Contributes to #11478
## Solution
- Made `bevy_utils::tracing` `doc(hidden)`
- Re-exported `tracing` from `bevy_log` for end-users
- Added `tracing` directly to crates that need it.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
If you were importing `tracing` via `bevy::utils::tracing`, instead use
`bevy::log::tracing`. Note that many items within `tracing` are also
directly re-exported from `bevy::log` as well, so you may only need
`bevy::log` for the most common items (e.g., `warn!`, `trace!`, etc.).
This also applies to the `log_once!` family of macros.
## Notes
- While this doesn't reduce the line-count in `bevy_utils`, it further
decouples the internal crates from `bevy_utils`, making its eventual
removal more feasible in the future.
- I have just imported `tracing` as we do for all dependencies. However,
a workspace dependency may be more appropriate for version management.
# Objective
- Contributes to #11478
- Contributes to #16877
## Solution
- Removed everything except `Instant` from `bevy_utils::time`
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
If you relied on any of the following from `bevy_utils::time`:
- `Duration`
- `TryFromFloatSecsError`
Import these directly from `core::time` regardless of platform target
(WASM, mobile, etc.)
If you relied on any of the following from `bevy_utils::time`:
- `SystemTime`
- `SystemTimeError`
Instead import these directly from either `std::time` or `web_time` as
appropriate for your target platform.
## Notes
`Duration` and `TryFromFloatSecsError` are both re-exports from
`core::time` regardless of whether they are used from `web_time` or
`std::time`, so there is no value gained from re-exporting them from
`bevy_utils::time` as well. As for `SystemTime` and `SystemTimeError`,
no Bevy internal crates or examples rely on these types. Since Bevy
doesn't have a `Time<Wall>` resource for interacting with wall-time (and
likely shouldn't need one), I think removing these from `bevy_utils`
entirely and waiting for a use-case to justify inclusion is a reasonable
path forward.
# Objective
Fixes#16104
## Solution
I removed all instances of `:?` and put them back one by one where it
caused an error.
I removed some bevy_utils helper functions that were only used in 2
places and don't add value. See: #11478
## Testing
CI should catch the mistakes
## Migration Guide
`bevy::utils::{dbg,info,warn,error}` were removed. Use
`bevy::utils::tracing::{debug,info,warn,error}` instead.
---------
Co-authored-by: SpecificProtagonist <vincentjunge@posteo.net>
# Objective
- Fixes#16892
## Solution
- Removed `TypeRegistryPlugin` (`Name` is now automatically registered
with a default `App`)
- Moved `TaskPoolPlugin` to `bevy_app`
- Moved `FrameCountPlugin` to `bevy_diagnostic`
- Deleted now-empty `bevy_core`
## Testing
- CI
## Migration Guide
- `TypeRegistryPlugin` no longer exists. If you can't use a default
`App` but still need `Name` registered, do so manually with
`app.register_type::<Name>()`.
- References to `TaskPoolPlugin` and associated types will need to
import it from `bevy_app` instead of `bevy_core`
- References to `FrameCountPlugin` and associated types will need to
import it from `bevy_diagnostic` instead of `bevy_core`
## Notes
This strategy was agreed upon by Cart and several other members in
[Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1319137218312278077).
# Objective
Implement a new `AssetChanged` query filter that allows users to query
for entities whose related assets may have changed.
- Closes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5069
- Unblocks #16420. Currently, `cold-specialization`, a key rendering
optimization for unlocking ancillary benefits of the retained render
world, is blocked on being unable detect all scenarios in which an
entity's mesh/material changes using events and observers. An
`AssetChanged` filter will drastically simplify our implementation and
be more robust to future changes.
Originally implemented by @nicopap in #5080.
## Solution
- Adds a new `AssetChanged` query filter that initializes a
`AssetChanges<A>` resource that tracks changed assets and ticks in
`asset_events`.
- ~Reverts #13343 and changes the api of `get_state` to accept `impl
Into<UnsafeWorldCell<'w>>` to allow accessing the `AssetChanges<A>`
resource.~
- Adds a `AsAssetId` trait used for newtype handle wrappers (e.g.
`Mesh3d`) that allows associating a component with the underlying
`Asset` it represents.
## Testing
- Tests are added for `AssetChanged`.
- TBD on performance. We are going to add this `Mesh3d` and
`MeshMaterial3d` (etc) in the renderer. Long term wins in render
performance this unblocks should swamp tracking overhead for any
realistic workload.
## Migration Guide
- The `asset_events` system is no longer public. Users should order
their systems relative to the `AssetEvents` system set.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nico@nicopap.ch>
Co-authored-by: Patrick Walton <pcwalton@mimiga.net>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
We were waiting for 1.83 to address most of these, due to a bug with
`missing_docs` and `expect`. Relates to, but does not entirely complete,
#15059.
## Solution
- Upgrade to 1.83
- Switch `allow(missing_docs)` to `expect(missing_docs)`
- Remove a few now-unused `allow`s along the way, or convert to `expect`
# Objective
- Remove `derive_more`'s error derivation and replace it with
`thiserror`
## Solution
- Added `derive_more`'s `error` feature to `deny.toml` to prevent it
sneaking back in.
- Reverted to `thiserror` error derivation
## Notes
Merge conflicts were too numerous to revert the individual changes, so
this reversion was done manually. Please scrutinise carefully during
review.
# Objective
The type `AssetLoadError` has `PartialEq` and `Eq` impls, which is
problematic due to the fact that the `AssetLoaderError` and
`AddAsyncError` variants lie in their impls: they will return `true` for
any `Box<dyn Error>` with the same `TypeId`, even if the actual value is
different. This can lead to subtle bugs if a user relies on the equality
comparison to ensure that two values are equal.
The same is true for `DependencyLoadState`,
`RecursiveDependencyLoadState`.
More generally, it is an anti-pattern for large error types involving
dynamic dispatch, such as `AssetLoadError`, to have equality
comparisons. Directly comparing two errors for equality is usually not
desired -- if some logic needs to branch based on the value of an error,
it is usually more correct to check for specific variants and inspect
their fields.
As far as I can tell, the only reason these errors have equality
comparisons is because the `LoadState` enum wraps `AssetLoadError` for
its `Failed` variant. This equality comparison is only used to check for
`== LoadState::Loaded`, which we can easily replace with an `is_loaded`
method.
## Solution
Remove the `{Partial}Eq` impls from `LoadState`, which also allows us to
remove it from the error types.
## Migration Guide
The types `bevy_asset::AssetLoadError` and `bevy_asset::LoadState` no
longer support equality comparisons. If you need to check for an asset's
load state, consider checking for a specific variant using
`LoadState::is_loaded` or the `matches!` macro. Similarly, consider
using the `matches!` macro to check for specific variants of the
`AssetLoadError` type if you need to inspect the value of an asset load
error in your code.
`DependencyLoadState` and `RecursiveDependencyLoadState` are not
released yet, so no migration needed,
---------
Co-authored-by: Joseph <21144246+JoJoJet@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- Closes#15716
- Closes#15718
## Solution
- Replace `Handle<MeshletMesh>` with a new `MeshletMesh3d` component
- As expected there were some random things that needed fixing:
- A couple tests were storing handles just to prevent them from being
dropped I believe, which seems to have been unnecessary in some.
- The `SpriteBundle` still had a `Handle<Image>` field. I've removed
this.
- Tests in `bevy_sprite` incorrectly added a `Handle<Image>` field
outside of the `Sprite` component.
- A few examples were still inserting `Handle`s, switched those to their
corresponding wrappers.
- 2 examples that were still querying for `Handle<Image>` were changed
to query `Sprite`
## Testing
- I've verified that the changed example work now
## Migration Guide
`Handle` can no longer be used as a `Component`. All existing Bevy types
using this pattern have been wrapped in their own semantically
meaningful type. You should do the same for any custom `Handle`
components your project needs.
The `Handle<MeshletMesh>` component is now `MeshletMesh3d`.
The `WithMeshletMesh` type alias has been removed. Use
`With<MeshletMesh3d>` instead.
# Objective
If a `Resource` implements `FromWorld` or `Default`, it's nicer to be
able to write:
```rust
let foo = world.get_resource_or_init::<Foo>();
```
Rather than:
```rust
let foo = world.get_resource_or_insert_with(Foo::default);
```
The latter is also not possible if a type implements `FromWorld` only,
and not `Default`.
## Solution
Added:
```rust
impl World {
pub fn get_resource_or_init<R: Resource + FromWorld>(&mut self) -> Mut<'_, R>;
}
```
Turns out all current in-engine uses of `get_resource_or_insert_with`
are exactly the above, so they've also been replaced.
## Testing
- Added a doc-test.
- Also added a doc-test for `World::get_resource_or_insert_with`.
# Objective
The `NestedLoader` API as it stands right now is somewhat lacking:
- It consists of several types `NestedLoader`, `UntypedNestedLoader`,
`DirectNestedLoader`, and `UntypedDirectNestedLoader`, where a typestate
pattern on `NestedLoader` would be make it more obvious what it does,
and allow centralising the documentation
- The term "untyped" in the asset loader code is overloaded. It can mean
either:
- we have literally no idea what the type of this asset will be when we
load it (I dub this "unknown type")
- we know what type of asset it will be, but we don't know it statically
- we only have a TypeId (I dub this "dynamic type" / "erased")
- There is no way to get an `UntypedHandle` (erased) given a `TypeId`
## Solution
Changes `NestedLoader` into a type-state pattern, adding two type
params:
- `T` determines the typing
- `StaticTyped`, the default, where you pass in `A` statically into `fn
load<A>() -> ..`
- `DynamicTyped`, where you give a `TypeId`, giving you a
`UntypedHandle`
- `UnknownTyped`, where you have literally no idea what type of asset
you're loading, giving you a `Handle<LoadedUntypedAsset>`
- `M` determines the "mode" (bikeshedding TBD, I couldn't come up with a
better name)
- `Deferred`, the default, won't load the asset when you call `load`,
but it does give you a `Handle` to it (this is nice since it can be a
sync fn)
- `Immediate` will load the asset as soon as you call it, and give you
access to it, but you must be in an async context to call it
Changes some naming of internals in `AssetServer` to fit the new
definitions of "dynamic type" and "unknown type". Note that I didn't do
a full pass over this code to keep the diff small. That can probably be
done in a new PR - I think the definiton I laid out of unknown type vs.
erased makes it pretty clear where each one applies.
<details>
<summary>Old issue</summary>
The only real problem I have with this PR is the requirement to pass in
`type_name` (from `core::any::type_name`) into Erased. Users might not
have that type name, only the ID, and it just seems sort of weird to
*have* to give an asset type name. However, the reason we need it is
because of this:
```rs
pub(crate) fn get_or_create_path_handle_erased(
&mut self,
path: AssetPath<'static>,
type_id: TypeId,
type_name: &str,
loading_mode: HandleLoadingMode,
meta_transform: Option<MetaTransform>,
) -> (UntypedHandle, bool) {
let result = self.get_or_create_path_handle_internal(
path,
Some(type_id),
loading_mode,
meta_transform,
);
// it is ok to unwrap because TypeId was specified above
unwrap_with_context(result, type_name).unwrap()
}
pub(crate) fn unwrap_with_context<T>(
result: Result<T, GetOrCreateHandleInternalError>,
type_name: &str,
) -> Option<T> {
match result {
Ok(value) => Some(value),
Err(GetOrCreateHandleInternalError::HandleMissingButTypeIdNotSpecified) => None,
Err(GetOrCreateHandleInternalError::MissingHandleProviderError(_)) => {
panic!("Cannot allocate an Asset Handle of type '{type_name}' because the asset type has not been initialized. \
Make sure you have called app.init_asset::<{type_name}>()")
}
}
}
```
This `unwrap_with_context` is literally the only reason we need the
`type_name`. Potentially, this can be turned into an `impl
Into<Option<&str>>`, and output a different error message if the type
name is missing. Since if we are loading an asset where we only know the
type ID, by definition we can't output that error message, since we
don't have the type name. I'm open to suggestions on this.
</details>
## Testing
Not sure how to test this, since I kept most of the actual NestedLoader
logic the same. The only new API is loading an `UntypedHandle` when in
the `DynamicTyped, Immediate` state.
## Migration Guide
Code which uses `bevy_asset`'s `LoadContext::loader` / `NestedLoader`
will see some naming changes:
- `untyped` is replaced by `with_unknown_type`
- `with_asset_type` is replaced by `with_static_type`
- `with_asset_type_id` is replaced by `with_dynamic_type`
- `direct` is replaced by `immediate` (the opposite of "immediate" is
"deferred")
# Objective
Fixes#15541
A bunch of lifetimes were added during the Assets V2 rework, but after
moving to async traits in #12550 they can be elided. That PR mentions
that this might be the case, but apparently it wasn't followed up on at
the time.
~~I ended up grepping for `<'a` and finding a similar case in
`bevy_reflect` which I also fixed.~~ (edit: that one was needed
apparently)
Note that elided lifetimes are unstable in `impl Trait`. If that gets
stabilized then we can elide even more.
## Solution
Remove the extra lifetimes.
## Testing
Everything still compiles. If I have messed something up there is a
small risk that some user code stops compiling, but all the examples
still work at least.
---
## Migration Guide
The traits `AssetLoader`, `AssetSaver` and `Process` traits from
`bevy_asset` now use elided lifetimes. If you implement these then
remove the named lifetime.
# Objective
- Fixes#6370
- Closes#6581
## Solution
- Added the following lints to the workspace:
- `std_instead_of_core`
- `std_instead_of_alloc`
- `alloc_instead_of_core`
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [item level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Item%5C%3A)
to split all `use` statements into single items.
- Used `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix
--allow-dirty` to _attempt_ to resolve the new linting issues, and
intervened where the lint was unable to resolve the issue automatically
(usually due to needing an `extern crate alloc;` statement in a crate
root).
- Manually removed certain uses of `std` where negative feature gating
prevented `--all-features` from finding the offending uses.
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [crate level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Crate%5C%3A)
to re-merge all `use` statements matching Bevy's previous styling.
- Manually fixed cases where the `fmt` tool could not re-merge `use`
statements due to conditional compilation attributes.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally
## Migration Guide
The MSRV is now 1.81. Please update to this version or higher.
## Notes
- This is a _massive_ change to try and push through, which is why I've
outlined the semi-automatic steps I used to create this PR, in case this
fails and someone else tries again in the future.
- Making this change has no impact on user code, but does mean Bevy
contributors will be warned to use `core` and `alloc` instead of `std`
where possible.
- This lint is a critical first step towards investigating `no_std`
options for Bevy.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
> Rust 1.81 released the #[expect(...)] attribute, which works like
#[allow(...)] but throws a warning if the lint isn't raised. This is
preferred to #[allow(...)] because it tells us when it can be removed.
- Adopts the parts of #15118 that are complete, and updates the branch
so it can be merged.
- There were a few conflicts, let me know if I misjudged any of 'em.
Alice's
[recommendation](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/15059#issuecomment-2349263900)
seems well-taken, let's do this crate by crate now that @BD103 has done
the lion's share of this!
(Relates to, but doesn't yet completely finish #15059.)
Crates this _doesn't_ cover:
- bevy_input
- bevy_gilrs
- bevy_window
- bevy_winit
- bevy_state
- bevy_render
- bevy_picking
- bevy_core_pipeline
- bevy_sprite
- bevy_text
- bevy_pbr
- bevy_ui
- bevy_gltf
- bevy_gizmos
- bevy_dev_tools
- bevy_internal
- bevy_dylib
---------
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Frankel <ben.frankel7@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antony <antony.m.3012@gmail.com>
# Objective
Bevy's asset system is powerful and generally well-designed but very
opaque.
Beginners struggle to discover how to do simple tasks and grok the
fundamental data models, while more advanced users trip over the
assorted traits and their relation to each other.
Reverts #15054 ;)
## Solution
This PR adds module documentation to `bevy_assets`, tweaking the
associated documentation on the items as needed to provide further
details and bread crumbs.
If you have ideas for other important, hard-to-discover patterns or
functionality in this crate, please let me know.
That said, I've left out a section on asset preprocessing which *should*
eventually go here. That is substantially more uncertain, and requires
both more time to investigate and more expertise to review.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: TrialDragon <31419708+TrialDragon@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: NotAFile <notafile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au>
Co-authored-by: JMS55 <47158642+JMS55@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
# Objective
We should attempt to document the entirety of bevy_assets. `AssetMode`
is missing docs explaining what it is, how it's used and why it exists.
## Solution
Add docs, focusing on the context in
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/10157.
# Objective
- Crate-level prelude modules, such as `bevy_ecs::prelude`, are plagued
with inconsistency! Let's fix it!
## Solution
Format all preludes based on the following rules:
1. All preludes should have brief documentation in the format of:
> The _name_ prelude.
>
> This includes the most common types in this crate, re-exported for
your convenience.
2. All documentation should be outer, not inner. (`///` instead of
`//!`.)
3. No prelude modules should be annotated with `#[doc(hidden)]`. (Items
within them may, though I'm not sure why this was done.)
## Testing
- I manually searched for the term `mod prelude` and updated all
occurrences by hand. 🫠
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
