Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
François Mockers
383b351045 chore: Release 2025-05-31 00:18:34 +02:00
François Mockers
e9418b3845 Release 0.16.0 2025-04-21 23:14:00 +02:00
François Mockers
608f902d1a Release 0.16.0-rc.5 2025-04-15 09:11:38 +02:00
François Mockers
c4b3d75b46 Release 0.16.0-rc.4 2025-04-11 09:12:55 +02:00
François Mockers
bdfd7a3443 Release 0.16.0-rc.3 2025-03-31 23:07:43 +02:00
François Mockers
1f44b56310 Release 0.16.0-rc.2 2025-03-26 19:18:20 +01:00
François Mockers
920515adab Release 0.16.0-rc.1 2025-03-18 21:48:22 +01:00
Zachary Harrold
5241e09671
Upgrade to Rust Edition 2024 (#17967)
# Objective

- Fixes #17960

## Solution

- Followed the [edition upgrade
guide](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/editions/transitioning-an-existing-project-to-a-new-edition.html)

## Testing

- CI

---

## Summary of Changes

### Documentation Indentation

When using lists in documentation, proper indentation is now linted for.
This means subsequent lines within the same list item must start at the
same indentation level as the item.

```rust
/* Valid */
/// - Item 1
///   Run-on sentence.
/// - Item 2
struct Foo;

/* Invalid */
/// - Item 1
///     Run-on sentence.
/// - Item 2
struct Foo;
```

### Implicit `!` to `()` Conversion

`!` (the never return type, returned by `panic!`, etc.) no longer
implicitly converts to `()`. This is particularly painful for systems
with `todo!` or `panic!` statements, as they will no longer be functions
returning `()` (or `Result<()>`), making them invalid systems for
functions like `add_systems`. The ideal fix would be to accept functions
returning `!` (or rather, _not_ returning), but this is blocked on the
[stabilisation of the `!` type
itself](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.never.html), which is
not done.

The "simple" fix would be to add an explicit `-> ()` to system
signatures (e.g., `|| { todo!() }` becomes `|| -> () { todo!() }`).
However, this is _also_ banned, as there is an existing lint which (IMO,
incorrectly) marks this as an unnecessary annotation.

So, the "fix" (read: workaround) is to put these kinds of `|| -> ! { ...
}` closuers into variables and give the variable an explicit type (e.g.,
`fn()`).

```rust
// Valid
let system: fn() = || todo!("Not implemented yet!");
app.add_systems(..., system);

// Invalid
app.add_systems(..., || todo!("Not implemented yet!"));
```

### Temporary Variable Lifetimes

The order in which temporary variables are dropped has changed. The
simple fix here is _usually_ to just assign temporaries to a named
variable before use.

### `gen` is a keyword

We can no longer use the name `gen` as it is reserved for a future
generator syntax. This involved replacing uses of the name `gen` with
`r#gen` (the raw-identifier syntax).

### Formatting has changed

Use statements have had the order of imports changed, causing a
substantial +/-3,000 diff when applied. For now, I have opted-out of
this change by amending `rustfmt.toml`

```toml
style_edition = "2021"
```

This preserves the original formatting for now, reducing the size of
this PR. It would be a simple followup to update this to 2024 and run
`cargo fmt`.

### New `use<>` Opt-Out Syntax

Lifetimes are now implicitly included in RPIT types. There was a handful
of instances where it needed to be added to satisfy the borrow checker,
but there may be more cases where it _should_ be added to avoid
breakages in user code.

### `MyUnitStruct { .. }` is an invalid pattern

Previously, you could match against unit structs (and unit enum
variants) with a `{ .. }` destructuring. This is no longer valid.

### Pretty much every use of `ref` and `mut` are gone

Pattern binding has changed to the point where these terms are largely
unused now. They still serve a purpose, but it is far more niche now.

### `iter::repeat(...).take(...)` is bad

New lint recommends using the more explicit `iter::repeat_n(..., ...)`
instead.

## Migration Guide

The lifetimes of functions using return-position impl-trait (RPIT) are
likely _more_ conservative than they had been previously. If you
encounter lifetime issues with such a function, please create an issue
to investigate the addition of `+ use<...>`.

## Notes

- Check the individual commits for a clearer breakdown for what
_actually_ changed.

---------

Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
2025-02-24 03:54:47 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
573b980685
Bump Version after Release (#17176)
Bump version after release
This PR has been auto-generated

---------

Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
2025-01-06 00:04:44 +00:00
Coder-Joe458
8f5345573c
Remove manual --cfg docsrs (#14376)
# Objective

- Fixes #14132 

## Solution

- Remove the cfg docsrs
2024-07-22 18:58:04 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
8df10d2713
Bump Version after Release (#14219)
Bump version after release
This PR has been auto-generated

Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
2024-07-08 12:54:08 +00:00
François Mockers
b17292f9d1
rename the crate bevy_state_macros_official back to its original name (#13732)
# Objective

- Thanks to the original author we can now use the original name

## Solution

- Use it
2024-06-07 12:49:21 +00:00
François Mockers
98bc5ff8c4
Update crate metadata for bevy state (#13722)
# Objective

- crate metadata for bevy_state has been copied from bevy_ecs

## Solution

- Update it
2024-06-07 01:54:53 +00:00
François Mockers
401234a5fb
rename bevy_state_macros to bevy_state_macros_official (#13721)
# Objective

- `bevy_state_macros` is a new crate added in the 0.14
- it already exists outside of the bevy org:
https://crates.io/crates/bevy_state_macros

## Solution

- Rename the crate
2024-06-06 22:18:05 +00:00
Lee-Orr
42ba9dfaea
Separate state crate (#13216)
# Objective

Extracts the state mechanisms into a new crate called "bevy_state".

This comes with a few goals:

- state wasn't really an inherent machinery of the ecs system, and so
keeping it within bevy_ecs felt forced
- by mixing it in with bevy_ecs, the maintainability of our more robust
state system was significantly compromised

moving state into a new crate makes it easier to encapsulate as it's own
feature, and easier to read and understand since it's no longer a
single, massive file.

## Solution

move the state-related elements from bevy_ecs to a new crate

## Testing

- Did you test these changes? If so, how? all the automated tests
migrated and passed, ran the pre-existing examples without changes to
validate.

---

## Migration Guide

Since bevy_state is now gated behind the `bevy_state` feature, projects
that use state but don't use the `default-features` will need to add
that feature flag.

Since it is no longer part of bevy_ecs, projects that use bevy_ecs
directly will need to manually pull in `bevy_state`, trigger the
StateTransition schedule, and handle any of the elements that bevy_app
currently sets up.

---------

Co-authored-by: Kristoffer Søholm <k.soeholm@gmail.com>
2024-05-09 18:06:05 +00:00