Bump version after release
This PR has been auto-generated
Fixes#19766
---------
Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Currently there is predefinied list of supported DataTypes that can be
detected on Bevy JSON Schema generation and mapped as reflect_types
array elements.
- Make it possible to register custom `reflectTypes` mappings for Bevy
JSON Schema.
## Solution
- Create a `SchemaTypesMetadata` Resource that will hold mappings for
`TypeId` of `TypeData`. List is bigger from beggining and it is possible
to expand it without forking package.
## Testing
- I use it for quite a while in my game, I have a fork of bevy_remote
with more changes that later I want to merge to main as well.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- Many strings in bevy_ecs are created but only used for debug: system
name, component name, ...
- Those strings make a significant part of the final binary and are no
use in a released game
## Solution
- Use [`strings`](https://linux.die.net/man/1/strings) to find ...
strings in a binary
- Try to find where they come from
- Many are made from `type_name::<T>()` and only used in error / debug
messages
- Add a new structure `DebugName` that holds no value if `debug` feature
is disabled
- Replace `core::any::type_name::<T>()` by `DebugName::type_name::<T>()`
## Testing
Measurements were taken without the new feature being enabled by
default, to help with commands
### File Size
I tried building the `breakout` example with `cargo run --release
--example breakout`
|`debug` enabled|`debug` disabled|
|-|-|
|81621776 B|77735728B|
|77.84MB|74.13MB|
### Compilation time
`hyperfine --min-runs 15 --prepare "cargo clean && sleep 5"
'RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout'
'RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout --features
debug'`
```
breakout' 'RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout --features debug'
Benchmark 1: RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout
Time (mean ± σ): 84.856 s ± 3.565 s [User: 1093.817 s, System: 32.547 s]
Range (min … max): 78.038 s … 89.214 s 15 runs
Benchmark 2: RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout --features debug
Time (mean ± σ): 92.303 s ± 2.466 s [User: 1193.443 s, System: 33.803 s]
Range (min … max): 90.619 s … 99.684 s 15 runs
Summary
RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout ran
1.09 ± 0.05 times faster than RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout --features debug
```
# Objective
I set out with one simple goal: clearly document the differences between
each of the component lifecycle events via module docs.
Unfortunately, no such module existed: the various lifecycle code was
scattered to the wind.
Without a unified module, it's very hard to discover the related types,
and there's nowhere good to put my shiny new documentation.
## Solution
1. Unify the assorted types into a single
`bevy_ecs::component_lifecycle` module.
2. Write docs.
3. Write a migration guide.
## Testing
Thanks CI!
## Follow-up
1. The lifecycle event names are pretty confusing, especially
`OnReplace`. We should consider renaming those. No bikeshedding in my PR
though!
2. Observers need real module docs too :(
3. Any additional functional changes should be done elsewhere; this is a
simple docs and re-org PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: theotherphil <phil.j.ellison@gmail.com>
# Objective
- #19504 showed a 11x regression in getting component values for
unregistered components. This pr should fix that and improve others a
little too.
- This is some cleanup work from #18173 .
## Solution
- Whenever we expect a component value to exist, we only care about
fully registered components, not queued to be registered components
since, for the value to exist, it must be registered.
- So we can use the faster `get_valid_*` instead of `get_*` in a lot of
places.
- Also found a bug where `valid_*` did not forward to `get_valid_*`
properly. That's fixed.
## Testing
CI
# Objective
cargo update was required to build because into_values was added in a
patch version
## Solution
Depend on the new patch
## Testing
Builds locally now
# Objective
- Fixes#18869.
## Solution
The issue was the `?` after a `Result` raising the error, instead of
treating it.
Instead it is handled with `ok`, `and_then`, `map` ...
_Edit: I added the following logic._
On `bevy/query` remote requests, when `strict` is false:
- Unregistered components in `option` and `without` are ignored.
- Unregistered components in `has` are considered absent from the
entity.
- Unregistered components in `components` and `with` result in an empty
response since they specify hard requirements.
I made the `get_component_ids` function return a
`AnyhowResult<(Vec<(TypeId, ComponentId)>, Vec<String>)>` instead of the
previous `AnyhowResult<Vec<(TypeId, ComponentId)>>`; that is I added the
list of unregistered components.
## Testing
I tested changes using the same procedure as in the linked issue:
```sh
cargo run --example server --features="bevy_remote"
```
In another terminal:
```sh
# Not strict:
$ curl -X POST http://localhost:15702 -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{ "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "bevy/query", "id": 0, "params": { "data": { "components": [ "foo::bar::MyComponent" ] } } }'
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":[]}
# Strict:
$ curl -X POST http://localhost:15702 -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{ "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "bevy/query", "id": 0, "params": { "data": { "components": [ "foo::bar::MyComponent" ] }, "strict": true } }'
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"error":{"code":-23402,"message":"Component `foo::bar::MyComponent` isn't registered or used in the world"}}
```
# Objective
There are two problems this aims to solve.
First, `Entity::index` is currently a `u32`. That means there are
`u32::MAX + 1` possible entities. Not only is that awkward, but it also
make `Entity` allocation more difficult. I discovered this while working
on remote entity reservation, but even on main, `Entities` doesn't
handle the `u32::MAX + 1` entity very well. It can not be batch reserved
because that iterator uses exclusive ranges, which has a maximum upper
bound of `u32::MAX - 1`. In other words, having `u32::MAX` as a valid
index can be thought of as a bug right now. We either need to make that
invalid (this PR), which makes Entity allocation cleaner and makes
remote reservation easier (because the length only needs to be u32
instead of u64, which, in atomics is a big deal), or we need to take
another pass at `Entities` to make it handle the `u32::MAX` index
properly.
Second, `TableRow`, `ArchetypeRow` and `EntityIndex` (a type alias for
u32) all have `u32` as the underlying type. That means using these as
the index type in a `SparseSet` uses 64 bits for the sparse list because
it stores `Option<IndexType>`. By using `NonMaxU32` here, we cut the
memory of that list in half. To my knowledge, `EntityIndex` is the only
thing that would really benefit from this niche. `TableRow` and
`ArchetypeRow` I think are not stored in an `Option` in bulk. But if
they ever are, this would help. Additionally this ensures
`TableRow::INVALID` and `ArchetypeRow::INVALID` never conflict with an
actual row, which in a nice bonus.
As a related note, if we do components as entities where `ComponentId`
becomes `Entity`, the the `SparseSet<ComponentId>` will see a similar
memory improvement too.
## Solution
Create a new type `EntityRow` that wraps `NonMaxU32`, similar to
`TableRow` and `ArchetypeRow`.
Change `Entity::index` to this type.
## Downsides
`NonMax` is implemented as a `NonZero` with a binary inversion. That
means accessing and storing the value takes one more instruction. I
don't think that's a big deal, but it's worth mentioning.
As a consequence, `to_bits` uses `transmute` to skip the inversion which
keeps it a nop. But that also means that ordering has now flipped. In
other words, higher indices are considered less than lower indices. I
don't think that's a problem, but it's also worth mentioning.
## Alternatives
We could keep the index as a u32 type and just document that `u32::MAX`
is invalid, modifying `Entities` to ensure it never gets handed out.
(But that's not enforced by the type system.) We could still take
advantage of the niche here in `ComponentSparseSet`. We'd just need some
unsafe manual conversions, which is probably fine, but opens up the
possibility for correctness problems later.
We could change `Entities` to fully support the `u32::MAX` index. (But
that makes `Entities` more complex and potentially slightly slower.)
## Testing
- CI
- A few tests were changed because they depend on different ordering and
`to_bits` values.
## Future Work
- It might be worth removing the niche on `Entity::generation` since
there is now a different niche.
- We could move `Entity::generation` into it's own type too for clarity.
- We should change `ComponentSparseSet` to take advantage of the new
niche. (This PR doesn't change that yet.)
- Consider removing or updating `Identifier`. This is only used for
`Entity`, so it might be worth combining since `Entity` is now more
unique.
---------
Co-authored-by: atlv <email@atlasdostal.com>
Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au>
# Objective
Fixes a part of #14274.
Bevy has an incredibly inconsistent naming convention for its system
sets, both internally and across the ecosystem.
<img alt="System sets in Bevy"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d16e2027-793f-4ba4-9cc9-e780b14a5a1b"
width="450" />
*Names of public system set types in Bevy*
Most Bevy types use a naming of `FooSystem` or just `Foo`, but there are
also a few `FooSystems` and `FooSet` types. In ecosystem crates on the
other hand, `FooSet` is perhaps the most commonly used name in general.
Conventions being so wildly inconsistent can make it harder for users to
pick names for their own types, to search for system sets on docs.rs, or
to even discern which types *are* system sets.
To reign in the inconsistency a bit and help unify the ecosystem, it
would be good to establish a common recommended naming convention for
system sets in Bevy itself, similar to how plugins are commonly suffixed
with `Plugin` (ex: `TimePlugin`). By adopting a consistent naming
convention in first-party Bevy, we can softly nudge ecosystem crates to
follow suit (for types where it makes sense to do so).
Choosing a naming convention is also relevant now, as the [`bevy_cli`
recently adopted
lints](https://github.com/TheBevyFlock/bevy_cli/pull/345) to enforce
naming for plugins and system sets, and the recommended naming used for
system sets is still a bit open.
## Which Name To Use?
Now the contentious part: what naming convention should we actually
adopt?
This was discussed on the Bevy Discord at the end of last year, starting
[here](<https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1310659954683936789>).
`FooSet` and `FooSystems` were the clear favorites, with `FooSet` very
narrowly winning an unofficial poll. However, it seems to me like the
consensus was broadly moving towards `FooSystems` at the end and after
the poll, with Cart
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311140204974706708))
and later Alice
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311092530732859533))
and also me being in favor of it.
Let's do a quick pros and cons list! Of course these are just what I
thought of, so take it with a grain of salt.
`FooSet`:
- Pro: Nice and short!
- Pro: Used by many ecosystem crates.
- Pro: The `Set` suffix comes directly from the trait name `SystemSet`.
- Pro: Pairs nicely with existing APIs like `in_set` and
`configure_sets`.
- Con: `Set` by itself doesn't actually indicate that it's related to
systems *at all*, apart from the implemented trait. A set of what?
- Con: Is `FooSet` a set of `Foo`s or a system set related to `Foo`? Ex:
`ContactSet`, `MeshSet`, `EnemySet`...
`FooSystems`:
- Pro: Very clearly indicates that the type represents a collection of
systems. The actual core concept, system(s), is in the name.
- Pro: Parallels nicely with `FooPlugins` for plugin groups.
- Pro: Low risk of conflicts with other names or misunderstandings about
what the type is.
- Pro: In most cases, reads *very* nicely and clearly. Ex:
`PhysicsSystems` and `AnimationSystems` as opposed to `PhysicsSet` and
`AnimationSet`.
- Pro: Easy to search for on docs.rs.
- Con: Usually results in longer names.
- Con: Not yet as widely used.
Really the big problem with `FooSet` is that it doesn't actually
describe what it is. It describes what *kind of thing* it is (a set of
something), but not *what it is a set of*, unless you know the type or
check its docs or implemented traits. `FooSystems` on the other hand is
much more self-descriptive in this regard, at the cost of being a bit
longer to type.
Ultimately, in some ways it comes down to preference and how you think
of system sets. Personally, I was originally in favor of `FooSet`, but
have been increasingly on the side of `FooSystems`, especially after
seeing what the new names would actually look like in Avian and now
Bevy. I prefer it because it usually reads better, is much more clearly
related to groups of systems than `FooSet`, and overall *feels* more
correct and natural to me in the long term.
For these reasons, and because Alice and Cart also seemed to share a
preference for it when it was previously being discussed, I propose that
we adopt a `FooSystems` naming convention where applicable.
## Solution
Rename Bevy's system set types to use a consistent `FooSet` naming where
applicable.
- `AccessibilitySystem` → `AccessibilitySystems`
- `GizmoRenderSystem` → `GizmoRenderSystems`
- `PickSet` → `PickingSystems`
- `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` → `RunFixedMainLoopSystems`
- `TransformSystem` → `TransformSystems`
- `RemoteSet` → `RemoteSystems`
- `RenderSet` → `RenderSystems`
- `SpriteSystem` → `SpriteSystems`
- `StateTransitionSteps` → `StateTransitionSystems`
- `RenderUiSystem` → `RenderUiSystems`
- `UiSystem` → `UiSystems`
- `Animation` → `AnimationSystems`
- `AssetEvents` → `AssetEventSystems`
- `TrackAssets` → `AssetTrackingSystems`
- `UpdateGizmoMeshes` → `GizmoMeshSystems`
- `InputSystem` → `InputSystems`
- `InputFocusSet` → `InputFocusSystems`
- `ExtractMaterialsSet` → `MaterialExtractionSystems`
- `ExtractMeshesSet` → `MeshExtractionSystems`
- `RumbleSystem` → `RumbleSystems`
- `CameraUpdateSystem` → `CameraUpdateSystems`
- `ExtractAssetsSet` → `AssetExtractionSystems`
- `Update2dText` → `Text2dUpdateSystems`
- `TimeSystem` → `TimeSystems`
- `AudioPlaySet` → `AudioPlaybackSystems`
- `SendEvents` → `EventSenderSystems`
- `EventUpdates` → `EventUpdateSystems`
A lot of the names got slightly longer, but they are also a lot more
consistent, and in my opinion the majority of them read much better. For
a few of the names I took the liberty of rewording things a bit;
definitely open to any further naming improvements.
There are still also cases where the `FooSystems` naming doesn't really
make sense, and those I left alone. This primarily includes system sets
like `Interned<dyn SystemSet>`, `EnterSchedules<S>`, `ExitSchedules<S>`,
or `TransitionSchedules<S>`, where the type has some special purpose and
semantics.
## Todo
- [x] Should I keep all the old names as deprecated type aliases? I can
do this, but to avoid wasting work I'd prefer to first reach consensus
on whether these renames are even desired.
- [x] Migration guide
- [x] Release notes
# Objective
The goal of `bevy_platform_support` is to provide a set of platform
agnostic APIs, alongside platform-specific functionality. This is a high
traffic crate (providing things like HashMap and Instant). Especially in
light of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/18799, it
deserves a friendlier / shorter name.
Given that it hasn't had a full release yet, getting this change in
before Bevy 0.16 makes sense.
## Solution
- Rename `bevy_platform_support` to `bevy_platform`.
# Objective
In `bevy_enhanced_input`, I'm trying to associate `Actions` with a
schedule. I can do this via an associated type on a trait, but there's
no way to construct the associated label except by requiring a `Default`
implementation. However, Bevy labels don't implement `Default`.
## Solution
Add `Default` to all built-in labels. I think it should be useful in
general.
# Objective
- Some crates don't compile or have clippy warnings when building for
wasm32
## Solution
- bevy_asset: unused lifetime
- bevy_gltf: the error is not too large in wasm32
- bevy_remote: fails to compile as feature http is also gated on wasm32
- bevy_winit: unused import `error`
# Objective
Noticed that `bevy_remote` fails to compile without default features.
## Solution
Adjusted offending method to avoid reliance on `http` module when it is
disabled.
## Testing
- CI
- `cargo clippy -p bevy_remote --no-default-features`
# Objective
FilteredResource::get should return a Result instead of Option
Fixes#17480
---
## Migration Guide
Users will need to handle the different return type on
FilteredResource::get, FilteredResource::get_id,
FilteredResource::get_mut as it is now a Result not an Option.
# Objective
Prevents duplicate implementation between IntoSystemConfigs and
IntoSystemSetConfigs using a generic, adds a NodeType trait for more
config flexibility (opening the door to implement
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14195?).
## Solution
Followed writeup by @ItsDoot:
https://hackmd.io/@doot/rJeefFHc1x
Removes IntoSystemConfigs and IntoSystemSetConfigs, instead using
IntoNodeConfigs with generics.
## Testing
Pending
---
## Showcase
N/A
## Migration Guide
SystemSetConfigs -> NodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet>
SystemConfigs -> NodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem>
IntoSystemSetConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet, M>
IntoSystemConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem, M>
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Prevent usage of `println!`, `eprintln!` and the like because they
require `std`
- Fixes#17446
## Solution
- Enable the `print_stdout` and `print_stderr` clippy lints
- Replace all `println!` and `eprintln!` occurrences with `log::*` where
applicable or alternatively ignore the warnings
## Testing
- Run `cargo clippy --workspace` to ensure that there are no warnings
relating to printing to `stdout` or `stderr`
# Objective
So far, built-in BRP methods allow users to interact with entities'
components, but global resources have remained beyond its reach. The
goal of this PR is to take the first steps in rectifying this shortfall.
## Solution
Added five new default methods to BRP:
- `bevy/get_resource`: Extracts the value of a given resource from the
world.
- `bevy/insert_resource`: Serializes an input value to a given resource
type and inserts it into the world.
- `bevy/remove_resource`: Removes the given resource from the world.
- `bevy/mutate_resource`: Replaces the value of a field in a given
resource with the result of serializing a given input value.
- `bevy/list_resources`: Lists all resources in the type registry with
an available `ReflectResource`.
## Testing
Added a test resource to the `server` example scene that you can use to
mess around with the new BRP methods.
## Showcase
Resources can now be retrieved and manipulated remotely using a handful
of new BRP methods. For example, a resource that looks like this:
```rust
#[derive(Resource, Reflect, Serialize, Deserialize)]
#[reflect(Resource, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct PlayerSpawnSettings {
pub location: Vec2,
pub lives: u8,
}
```
can be manipulated remotely as follows.
Retrieving the value of the resource:
```json
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 1,
"method": "bevy/get_resource",
"params": {
"resource": "path::to::my::module::PlayerSpawnSettings"
}
}
```
Inserting a resource value into the world:
```json
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 2,
"method": "bevy/insert_resource",
"params": {
"resource": "path::to::my::module::PlayerSpawnSettings",
"value": {
"location": [
2.5,
2.5
],
"lives": 25
}
}
}
```
Removing the resource from the world:
```json
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 3,
"method": "bevy/remove_resource",
"params": {
"resource": "path::to::my::module::PlayerSpawnSettings"
}
}
```
Mutating a field of the resource specified by a path:
```json
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 4,
"method": "bevy/mutate_resource",
"params": {
"resource": "path::to::my::module::PlayerSpawnSettings",
"path": ".location.x",
"value": -3.0
}
}
```
Listing all manipulable resources in the type registry:
```json
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 5,
"method": "bevy/list_resources"
}
```
# Objective
- Fixes#17960
## Solution
- Followed the [edition upgrade
guide](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/editions/transitioning-an-existing-project-to-a-new-edition.html)
## Testing
- CI
---
## Summary of Changes
### Documentation Indentation
When using lists in documentation, proper indentation is now linted for.
This means subsequent lines within the same list item must start at the
same indentation level as the item.
```rust
/* Valid */
/// - Item 1
/// Run-on sentence.
/// - Item 2
struct Foo;
/* Invalid */
/// - Item 1
/// Run-on sentence.
/// - Item 2
struct Foo;
```
### Implicit `!` to `()` Conversion
`!` (the never return type, returned by `panic!`, etc.) no longer
implicitly converts to `()`. This is particularly painful for systems
with `todo!` or `panic!` statements, as they will no longer be functions
returning `()` (or `Result<()>`), making them invalid systems for
functions like `add_systems`. The ideal fix would be to accept functions
returning `!` (or rather, _not_ returning), but this is blocked on the
[stabilisation of the `!` type
itself](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.never.html), which is
not done.
The "simple" fix would be to add an explicit `-> ()` to system
signatures (e.g., `|| { todo!() }` becomes `|| -> () { todo!() }`).
However, this is _also_ banned, as there is an existing lint which (IMO,
incorrectly) marks this as an unnecessary annotation.
So, the "fix" (read: workaround) is to put these kinds of `|| -> ! { ...
}` closuers into variables and give the variable an explicit type (e.g.,
`fn()`).
```rust
// Valid
let system: fn() = || todo!("Not implemented yet!");
app.add_systems(..., system);
// Invalid
app.add_systems(..., || todo!("Not implemented yet!"));
```
### Temporary Variable Lifetimes
The order in which temporary variables are dropped has changed. The
simple fix here is _usually_ to just assign temporaries to a named
variable before use.
### `gen` is a keyword
We can no longer use the name `gen` as it is reserved for a future
generator syntax. This involved replacing uses of the name `gen` with
`r#gen` (the raw-identifier syntax).
### Formatting has changed
Use statements have had the order of imports changed, causing a
substantial +/-3,000 diff when applied. For now, I have opted-out of
this change by amending `rustfmt.toml`
```toml
style_edition = "2021"
```
This preserves the original formatting for now, reducing the size of
this PR. It would be a simple followup to update this to 2024 and run
`cargo fmt`.
### New `use<>` Opt-Out Syntax
Lifetimes are now implicitly included in RPIT types. There was a handful
of instances where it needed to be added to satisfy the borrow checker,
but there may be more cases where it _should_ be added to avoid
breakages in user code.
### `MyUnitStruct { .. }` is an invalid pattern
Previously, you could match against unit structs (and unit enum
variants) with a `{ .. }` destructuring. This is no longer valid.
### Pretty much every use of `ref` and `mut` are gone
Pattern binding has changed to the point where these terms are largely
unused now. They still serve a purpose, but it is far more niche now.
### `iter::repeat(...).take(...)` is bad
New lint recommends using the more explicit `iter::repeat_n(..., ...)`
instead.
## Migration Guide
The lifetimes of functions using return-position impl-trait (RPIT) are
likely _more_ conservative than they had been previously. If you
encounter lifetime issues with such a function, please create an issue
to investigate the addition of `+ use<...>`.
## Notes
- Check the individual commits for a clearer breakdown for what
_actually_ changed.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
- publish script copy the license files to all subcrates, meaning that
all publish are dirty. this breaks git verification of crates
- the order and list of crates to publish is manually maintained,
leading to error. cargo 1.84 is more strict and the list is currently
wrong
## Solution
- duplicate all the licenses to all crates and remove the
`--allow-dirty` flag
- instead of a manual list of crates, get it from `cargo package
--workspace`
- remove the `--no-verify` flag to... verify more things?
# Objective
- Contributes to #16877
## Solution
- Moved `hashbrown`, `foldhash`, and related types out of `bevy_utils`
and into `bevy_platform_support`
- Refactored the above to match the layout of these types in `std`.
- Updated crates as required.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
- The following items were moved out of `bevy_utils` and into
`bevy_platform_support::hash`:
- `FixedState`
- `DefaultHasher`
- `RandomState`
- `FixedHasher`
- `Hashed`
- `PassHash`
- `PassHasher`
- `NoOpHash`
- The following items were moved out of `bevy_utils` and into
`bevy_platform_support::collections`:
- `HashMap`
- `HashSet`
- `bevy_utils::hashbrown` has been removed. Instead, import from
`bevy_platform_support::collections` _or_ take a dependency on
`hashbrown` directly.
- `bevy_utils::Entry` has been removed. Instead, import from
`bevy_platform_support::collections::hash_map` or
`bevy_platform_support::collections::hash_set` as appropriate.
- All of the above equally apply to `bevy::utils` and
`bevy::platform_support`.
## Notes
- I left `PreHashMap`, `PreHashMapExt`, and `TypeIdMap` in `bevy_utils`
as they might be candidates for micro-crating. They can always be moved
into `bevy_platform_support` at a later date if desired.
# Objective
`bevy_ecs`'s `system` module is something of a grab bag, and *very*
large. This is particularly true for the `system_param` module, which is
more than 2k lines long!
While it could be defensible to put `Res` and `ResMut` there (lol no
they're in change_detection.rs, obviously), it doesn't make any sense to
put the `Resource` trait there. This is confusing to navigate (and
painful to work on and review).
## Solution
- Create a root level `bevy_ecs/resource.rs` module to mirror
`bevy_ecs/component.rs`
- move the `Resource` trait to that module
- move the `Resource` derive macro to that module as well (Rust really
likes when you pun on the names of the derive macro and trait and put
them in the same path)
- fix all of the imports
## Notes to reviewers
- We could probably move more stuff into here, but I wanted to keep this
PR as small as possible given the absurd level of import changes.
- This PR is ground work for my upcoming attempts to store resource data
on components (resources-as-entities). Splitting this code out will make
the work and review a bit easier, and is the sort of overdue refactor
that's good to do as part of more meaningful work.
## Testing
cargo build works!
## Migration Guide
`bevy_ecs::system::Resource` has been moved to
`bevy_ecs::resource::Resource`.
Fixes#17412
## Objective
`Parent` uses the "has a X" naming convention. There is increasing
sentiment that we should use the "is a X" naming convention for
relationships (following #17398). This leaves `Children` as-is because
there is prevailing sentiment that `Children` is clearer than `ParentOf`
in many cases (especially when treating it like a collection).
This renames `Parent` to `ChildOf`.
This is just the implementation PR. To discuss the path forward, do so
in #17412.
## Migration Guide
- The `Parent` component has been renamed to `ChildOf`.
This adds support for one-to-many non-fragmenting relationships (with
planned paths for fragmenting and non-fragmenting many-to-many
relationships). "Non-fragmenting" means that entities with the same
relationship type, but different relationship targets, are not forced
into separate tables (which would cause "table fragmentation").
Functionally, this fills a similar niche as the current Parent/Children
system. The biggest differences are:
1. Relationships have simpler internals and significantly improved
performance and UX. Commands and specialized APIs are no longer
necessary to keep everything in sync. Just spawn entities with the
relationship components you want and everything "just works".
2. Relationships are generalized. Bevy can provide additional built in
relationships, and users can define their own.
**REQUEST TO REVIEWERS**: _please don't leave top level comments and
instead comment on specific lines of code. That way we can take
advantage of threaded discussions. Also dont leave comments simply
pointing out CI failures as I can read those just fine._
## Built on top of what we have
Relationships are implemented on top of the Bevy ECS features we already
have: components, immutability, and hooks. This makes them immediately
compatible with all of our existing (and future) APIs for querying,
spawning, removing, scenes, reflection, etc. The fewer specialized APIs
we need to build, maintain, and teach, the better.
## Why focus on one-to-many non-fragmenting first?
1. This allows us to improve Parent/Children relationships immediately,
in a way that is reasonably uncontroversial. Switching our hierarchy to
fragmenting relationships would have significant performance
implications. ~~Flecs is heavily considering a switch to non-fragmenting
relations after careful considerations of the performance tradeoffs.~~
_(Correction from @SanderMertens: Flecs is implementing non-fragmenting
storage specialized for asset hierarchies, where asset hierarchies are
many instances of small trees that have a well defined structure)_
2. Adding generalized one-to-many relationships is currently a priority
for the [Next Generation Scene / UI
effort](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437).
Specifically, we're interested in building reactions and observers on
top.
## The changes
This PR does the following:
1. Adds a generic one-to-many Relationship system
3. Ports the existing Parent/Children system to Relationships, which now
lives in `bevy_ecs::hierarchy`. The old `bevy_hierarchy` crate has been
removed.
4. Adds on_despawn component hooks
5. Relationships can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior, meaning
that the entire relationship hierarchy is despawned when
`entity.despawn()` is called. The built in Parent/Children hierarchies
enable this behavior, and `entity.despawn_recursive()` has been removed.
6. `world.spawn` now applies commands after spawning. This ensures that
relationship bookkeeping happens immediately and removes the need to
manually flush. This is in line with the equivalent behaviors recently
added to the other APIs (ex: insert).
7. Removes the ValidParentCheckPlugin (system-driven / poll based) in
favor of a `validate_parent_has_component` hook.
## Using Relationships
The `Relationship` trait looks like this:
```rust
pub trait Relationship: Component + Sized {
type RelationshipSources: RelationshipSources<Relationship = Self>;
fn get(&self) -> Entity;
fn from(entity: Entity) -> Self;
}
```
A relationship is a component that:
1. Is a simple wrapper over a "target" Entity.
2. Has a corresponding `RelationshipSources` component, which is a
simple wrapper over a collection of entities. Every "target entity"
targeted by a "source entity" with a `Relationship` has a
`RelationshipSources` component, which contains every "source entity"
that targets it.
For example, the `Parent` component (as it currently exists in Bevy) is
the `Relationship` component and the entity containing the Parent is the
"source entity". The entity _inside_ the `Parent(Entity)` component is
the "target entity". And that target entity has a `Children` component
(which implements `RelationshipSources`).
In practice, the Parent/Children relationship looks like this:
```rust
#[derive(Relationship)]
#[relationship(relationship_sources = Children)]
pub struct Parent(pub Entity);
#[derive(RelationshipSources)]
#[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent)]
pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>);
```
The Relationship and RelationshipSources derives automatically implement
Component with the relevant configuration (namely, the hooks necessary
to keep everything in sync).
The most direct way to add relationships is to spawn entities with
relationship components:
```rust
let a = world.spawn_empty().id();
let b = world.spawn(Parent(a)).id();
assert_eq!(world.entity(a).get::<Children>().unwrap(), &[b]);
```
There are also convenience APIs for spawning more than one entity with
the same relationship:
```rust
world.spawn_empty().with_related::<Children>(|s| {
s.spawn_empty();
s.spawn_empty();
})
```
The existing `with_children` API is now a simpler wrapper over
`with_related`. This makes this change largely non-breaking for existing
spawn patterns.
```rust
world.spawn_empty().with_children(|s| {
s.spawn_empty();
s.spawn_empty();
})
```
There are also other relationship APIs, such as `add_related` and
`despawn_related`.
## Automatic recursive despawn via the new on_despawn hook
`RelationshipSources` can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior,
which will despawn all related entities in the relationship hierarchy:
```rust
#[derive(RelationshipSources)]
#[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent, despawn_descendants)]
pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>);
```
This means that `entity.despawn_recursive()` is no longer required.
Instead, just use `entity.despawn()` and the relevant related entities
will also be despawned.
To despawn an entity _without_ despawning its parent/child descendants,
you should remove the `Children` component first, which will also remove
the related `Parent` components:
```rust
entity
.remove::<Children>()
.despawn()
```
This builds on the on_despawn hook introduced in this PR, which is fired
when an entity is despawned (before other hooks).
## Relationships are the source of truth
`Relationship` is the _single_ source of truth component.
`RelationshipSources` is merely a reflection of what all the
`Relationship` components say. By embracing this, we are able to
significantly improve the performance of the system as a whole. We can
rely on component lifecycles to protect us against duplicates, rather
than needing to scan at runtime to ensure entities don't already exist
(which results in quadratic runtime). A single source of truth gives us
constant-time inserts. This does mean that we cannot directly spawn
populated `Children` components (or directly add or remove entities from
those components). I personally think this is a worthwhile tradeoff,
both because it makes the performance much better _and_ because it means
theres exactly one way to do things (which is a philosophy we try to
employ for Bevy APIs).
As an aside: treating both sides of the relationship as "equivalent
source of truth relations" does enable building simple and flexible
many-to-many relationships. But this introduces an _inherent_ need to
scan (or hash) to protect against duplicates.
[`evergreen_relations`](https://github.com/EvergreenNest/evergreen_relations)
has a very nice implementation of the "symmetrical many-to-many"
approach. Unfortunately I think the performance issues inherent to that
approach make it a poor choice for Bevy's default relationship system.
## Followup Work
* Discuss renaming `Parent` to `ChildOf`. I refrained from doing that in
this PR to keep the diff reasonable, but I'm personally biased toward
this change (and using that naming pattern generally for relationships).
* [Improved spawning
ergonomics](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/16920)
* Consider adding relationship observers/triggers for "relationship
targets" whenever a source is added or removed. This would replace the
current "hierarchy events" system, which is unused upstream but may have
existing users downstream. I think triggers are the better fit for this
than a buffered event queue, and would prefer not to add that back.
* Fragmenting relations: My current idea hinges on the introduction of
"value components" (aka: components whose type _and_ value determines
their ComponentId, via something like Hashing / PartialEq). By labeling
a Relationship component such as `ChildOf(Entity)` as a "value
component", `ChildOf(e1)` and `ChildOf(e2)` would be considered
"different components". This makes the transition between fragmenting
and non-fragmenting a single flag, and everything else continues to work
as expected.
* Many-to-many support
* Non-fragmenting: We can expand Relationship to be a list of entities
instead of a single entity. I have largely already written the code for
this.
* Fragmenting: With the "value component" impl mentioned above, we get
many-to-many support "for free", as it would allow inserting multiple
copies of a Relationship component with different target entities.
Fixes#3742 (If this PR is merged, I think we should open more targeted
followup issues for the work above, with a fresh tracking issue free of
the large amount of less-directed historical context)
Fixes#17301Fixes#12235Fixes#15299Fixes#15308
## Migration Guide
* Replace `ChildBuilder` with `ChildSpawnerCommands`.
* Replace calls to `.set_parent(parent_id)` with
`.insert(Parent(parent_id))`.
* Replace calls to `.replace_children()` with `.remove::<Children>()`
followed by `.add_children()`. Note that you'll need to manually despawn
any children that are not carried over.
* Replace calls to `.despawn_recursive()` with `.despawn()`.
* Replace calls to `.despawn_descendants()` with
`.despawn_related::<Children>()`.
* If you have any calls to `.despawn()` which depend on the children
being preserved, you'll need to remove the `Children` component first.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111
## Solution
Move `#![warn(clippy::allow_attributes,
clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason)]` to the workspace `Cargo.toml`
## Testing
Lots of CI testing, and local testing too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
# Objective
Add a method to mutate components with BRP.
Currently the only way to modify a component on an entity with BRP is to
insert a new one with the new values. This isn't ideal for several
reasons, one reason being that the client has to know what all the
fields are of the component and stay in sync with the server.
## Solution
Add a new BRP method called `bevy/mutate_component` to mutate a single
field in a component on an entity.
## Testing
Tested on a simple scene on all `Transform`, `Name`, and a custom
component.
---
## Showcase
Example JSON-RPC request to change the `Name` of an entity to "New
name!"
```json
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 0,
"method": "bevy/mutate_component",
"params": {
"entity": 4294967308,
"component": "bevy_ecs::name::Name",
"path": ".name",
"value": "New name!"
}
}
```
Or setting the X translation to 10.0 on a Transform:
```json
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 0,
"method": "bevy/mutate_component",
"params": {
"entity": 4294967308,
"component": "bevy_transform::components::transform::Transform",
"path": ".translation.x",
"value": 10.0
}
}
```
Clip of my Emacs BRP package using this method:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a786b245-5c20-4189-859f-2261c5086a68
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
# Objective
I realized that setting these to `deny` may have been a little
aggressive - especially since we upgrade warnings to denies in CI.
## Solution
Downgrades these lints to `warn`, so that compiles can work locally. CI
will still treat these as denies.
# Objective
- https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111
## Solution
Set the `clippy::allow_attributes` and
`clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason` lints to `deny`, and bring
`bevy_remote` in line with the new restrictions.
## Testing
`cargo clippy --tests --all-features --package bevy_remote` was run, and
no errors were encountered.
Bump version after release
This PR has been auto-generated
---------
Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
# Objective
It is not obvious that one would know these:
```json
{
"id": 1,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"result": [
"bevy_animation::AnimationPlayer",
"bevy_animation::AnimationTarget",
"bevy_animation::graph::AnimationGraphHandle",
"bevy_animation::transition::AnimationTransitions",
"bevy_audio::audio::PlaybackSettings",
"bevy_audio::audio::SpatialListener",
"bevy_core_pipeline::bloom::settings::Bloom",
"bevy_core_pipeline::contrast_adaptive_sharpening::ContrastAdaptiveSharpening",
**... snipping for brevity ...**
"bevy_ui::ui_node::Node",
"bevy_ui::ui_node::Outline",
"bevy_ui::ui_node::ScrollPosition",
"bevy_ui::ui_node::TargetCamera",
"bevy_ui::ui_node::UiAntiAlias",
"bevy_ui::ui_node::ZIndex",
"bevy_ui::widget::button::Button",
"bevy_window::monitor::Monitor",
"bevy_window:🪟:PrimaryWindow",
"bevy_window:🪟:Window",
"bevy_winit::cursor::CursorIcon",
"server::Cube"
]
}
```
Especially if you for example, are reading the GH examples because:
If you for example expand these things, due to the number of places bevy
re-exports things you'll find it difficult to find the true path of
something.
i.e you'd probably be forgiven for writing a query (using the
`client.rs` example):
```sh
$ cargo run --example client -- bevy_pbr::mesh_material::MeshMaterial3d | jq
{
"error": {
"code": -23402,
"message": "Unknown component type: `bevy_pbr::mesh_material::MeshMaterial3d`"
},
"id": 1,
"jsonrpc": "2.0"
}
```
which is where
8d9a00f548/crates/bevy_pbr/src/mesh_material.rs (L41)
would lead you to believe it is...
I've worked with bevy a lot, so it's no issue for me, but for others...
?
## Solution
- Add some more docs, including a sample request (`json` and `rust`)
## Testing
N/A
---
## Showcase
N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
# Objective
Resolve#16745
## Solution
Provide a way to map `AppTypeRegistry` types into a JSON Schema that can
be used in other applications. I took code from
https://github.com/kaosat-dev/Blenvy as a starting point, cleaned up and
adapter more for `bevy_remote` needs. Based on feedback and needs it
could be improved, I could add some filtering options, etc.
## Testing
- I was comparing results with the ones from code in `blenvy`
- There is added unit test, could be added more
- I was testing it in my game with this code:
```rust
fn types_to_file(world: &mut World) {
use bevy_remote::builtin_methods::export_registry_types;
let Ok(Ok(types_schema)) = world.run_system_cached_with(export_registry_types, None) else {
return;
};
let registry_save_path = std::path::Path::new("assets").join("registry.json");
let writer =
std::fs::File::create(registry_save_path).expect("should have created schema file");
serde_json::to_writer_pretty(writer, &types_schema).expect("Failed to save types to file");
}
```
It can be run by adding it at startup
```rust
app.add_systems(Startup, types_to_file);
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- Allow skiping components that don't have ComponentId yet instead of
failing `bevy/query` request.
## Solution
- Describe the solution used to achieve the objective above.
## Testing
My naive approach boils down to:
- bevy/list to get list of all components.
- bevy/query with empty components and has fields and a option that
contains result of the bevy/list.
Before that change I end up with bunch of `Component xxx isn't used in
the world` because some of the components wasn't spawned at any moment
yet in the game. Now it should work.
## Migration Guide
- `BrpQueryParams` now has `strict` boolean field. It serfs as a flag to
fail when encountering an invalid component rather than skipping it.
Defaults to false.
Updating dependencies; adopted version of #15696. (Supercedes #15696.)
Long answer: hashbrown is no longer using ahash by default, meaning that
we can't use the default-hasher methods with ahasher. So, we have to use
the longer-winded versions instead. This takes the opportunity to also
switch our default hasher as well, but without actually enabling the
default-hasher feature for hashbrown, meaning that we'll be able to
change our hasher more easily at the cost of all of these method calls
being obnoxious forever.
One large change from 0.15 is that `insert_unique_unchecked` is now
`unsafe`, and for cases where unsafe code was denied at the crate level,
I replaced it with `insert`.
## Migration Guide
`bevy_utils` has updated its version of `hashbrown` to 0.15 and now
defaults to `foldhash` instead of `ahash`. This means that if you've
hard-coded your hasher to `bevy_utils::AHasher` or separately used the
`ahash` crate in your code, you may need to switch to `foldhash` to
ensure that everything works like it does in Bevy.
# Objective
- Fixes#16497
- This is my first PR, so I'm still learning to contribute to the
project
## Solution
- Added struct `UnregisterSystemCached` and function
`unregister_system_cached`
- renamed `World::run_system_with_input` to `run_system_with`
- reordered input parameters for `World::run_system_once_with`
## Testing
- Added a crude test which registers a system via
`World::register_system_cached`, and removes it via
`Command::unregister_system_cached`.
## Migration Guide
- Change all occurrences of `World::run_system_with_input` to
`World::run_system_with`.
- swap the order of input parameters for `World::run_system_once_with`
such that the system comes before the input.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paul Mattern <mail@paulmattern.dev>
# Objective
BrpQueryRow doesn't serialize `has` field if it is empty. That is okay
until you try to deserialize it after. Then it will fail to deserialize
due to missing field.
## Solution
Serde support using default value when field is missing, this PR adds
that.
# Objective
When adding custom BRP methods one might need to:
- Run custom systems in the `RemoteLast` schedule.
- Order those systems before/after request processing and cleanup.
For example in `bevy_remote_inspector` we need a way to perform some
preparation _before_ request processing. And to perform cleanup
_between_ request processing and watcher cleanup.
## Solution
- Make `RemoteLast` public
- Add `RemoteSet` with `ProcessRequests` and `Cleanup` variants.
# Objective
- Attempts to fix#16042
## Solution
- Added a new `RemoteSystem` `SystemSet` for the BRP systems.
- Changed the schedule on which these systems run from `Update` to
`Last`.
## Testing
- I did not test these changes and would appreciate a hand in doing so.
I assume it would be good to test that you can order against these
systems easily now.
---
## Migration Guide
- `process_remote_requests`, `process_ongoing_watching_requests` and
`remove_closed_watching_requests` now run in the `Last` schedule. Make
sure you use `RemoteSystem` `SystemSet` in case you need to order your
systems against them.
# Objective
- bevy_remote Cargo.toml file references a readme that doesn't exist
- This is blocking releasing the rc
## Solution
- Remove the reference
## Objective
Be able to depend on the crate for the types without bringing in
`smol-hyper` and other http dependencies.
## Solution
Create a new `HTTP` feature that is enabled by default.
## Objective
Add a way to stream BRP requests when the data changes.
## Solution
#### BRP Side (reusable for other transports)
Add a new method handler type that returns a optional value. This
handler is run in update and if a value is returned it will be sent on
the message channel. Custom watching handlers can be added with
`RemotePlugin::with_watching_method`.
#### HTTP Side
If a request comes in with `+watch` in the method, it will respond with
`text/event-stream` rather than a single response.
## Testing
I tested with the podman HTTP client. This client has good support for
SSE's if you want to test it too.
## Parts I want some opinions on
- For separating watching methods I chose to add a `+watch` suffix to
the end kind of like `content-type` headers. A get would be
`bevy/get+watch`.
- Should watching methods send an initial response with everything or
only respond when a change happens? Currently the later is what happens.
## Future work
- The `bevy/query` method would also benefit from this but that
condition will be quite complex so I will leave that to later.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au>
# Objective
Following the pattern established in #15593, we can reduce the API
surface of `World` by providing a single function to grab both a
singular entity reference, or multiple entity references.
## Solution
The following functions can now also take multiple entity IDs and will
return multiple entity references back:
- `World::entity`
- `World::get_entity`
- `World::entity_mut`
- `World::get_entity_mut`
- `DeferredWorld::entity_mut`
- `DeferredWorld::get_entity_mut`
If you pass in X, you receive Y:
- give a single `Entity`, receive a single `EntityRef`/`EntityWorldMut`
(matches current behavior)
- give a `[Entity; N]`/`&[Entity; N]` (array), receive an equally-sized
`[EntityRef; N]`/`[EntityMut; N]`
- give a `&[Entity]` (slice), receive a
`Vec<EntityRef>`/`Vec<EntityMut>`
- give a `&EntityHashSet`, receive a
`EntityHashMap<EntityRef>`/`EntityHashMap<EntityMut>`
Note that `EntityWorldMut` is only returned in the single-entity case,
because having multiple at the same time would lead to UB. Also,
`DeferredWorld` receives an `EntityMut` in the single-entity case
because it does not allow structural access.
## Testing
- Added doc-tests on `World::entity`, `World::entity_mut`, and
`DeferredWorld::entity_mut`
- Added tests for aliased mutability and entity existence
---
## Showcase
<details>
<summary>Click to view showcase</summary>
The APIs for fetching `EntityRef`s and `EntityMut`s from the `World`
have been unified.
```rust
// This code will be referred to by subsequent code blocks.
let world = World::new();
let e1 = world.spawn_empty().id();
let e2 = world.spawn_empty().id();
let e3 = world.spawn_empty().id();
```
Querying for a single entity remains mostly the same:
```rust
// 0.14
let eref: EntityRef = world.entity(e1);
let emut: EntityWorldMut = world.entity_mut(e1);
let eref: Option<EntityRef> = world.get_entity(e1);
let emut: Option<EntityWorldMut> = world.get_entity_mut(e1);
// 0.15
let eref: EntityRef = world.entity(e1);
let emut: EntityWorldMut = world.entity_mut(e1);
let eref: Result<EntityRef, Entity> = world.get_entity(e1);
let emut: Result<EntityWorldMut, Entity> = world.get_entity_mut(e1);
```
Querying for multiple entities with an array has changed:
```rust
// 0.14
let erefs: [EntityRef; 2] = world.many_entities([e1, e2]);
let emuts: [EntityMut; 2] = world.many_entities_mut([e1, e2]);
let erefs: Result<[EntityRef; 2], Entity> = world.get_many_entities([e1, e2]);
let emuts: Result<[EntityMut; 2], QueryEntityError> = world.get_many_entities_mut([e1, e2]);
// 0.15
let erefs: [EntityRef; 2] = world.entity([e1, e2]);
let emuts: [EntityMut; 2] = world.entity_mut([e1, e2]);
let erefs: Result<[EntityRef; 2], Entity> = world.get_entity([e1, e2]);
let emuts: Result<[EntityMut; 2], EntityFetchError> = world.get_entity_mut([e1, e2]);
```
Querying for multiple entities with a slice has changed:
```rust
let ids = vec![e1, e2, e3]);
// 0.14
let erefs: Result<Vec<EntityRef>, Entity> = world.get_many_entities_dynamic(&ids[..]);
let emuts: Result<Vec<EntityMut>, QueryEntityError> = world.get_many_entities_dynamic_mut(&ids[..]);
// 0.15
let erefs: Result<Vec<EntityRef>, Entity> = world.get_entity(&ids[..]);
let emuts: Result<Vec<EntityMut>, EntityFetchError> = world.get_entity_mut(&ids[..]);
let erefs: Vec<EntityRef> = world.entity(&ids[..]); // Newly possible!
let emuts: Vec<EntityMut> = world.entity_mut(&ids[..]); // Newly possible!
```
Querying for multiple entities with an `EntityHashSet` has changed:
```rust
let set = EntityHashSet::from_iter([e1, e2, e3]);
// 0.14
let emuts: Result<Vec<EntityMut>, QueryEntityError> = world.get_many_entities_from_set_mut(&set);
// 0.15
let emuts: Result<EntityHashMap<EntityMut>, EntityFetchError> = world.get_entity_mut(&set);
let erefs: Result<EntityHashMap<EntityRef>, EntityFetchError> = world.get_entity(&set); // Newly possible!
let emuts: EntityHashMap<EntityMut> = world.entity_mut(&set); // Newly possible!
let erefs: EntityHashMap<EntityRef> = world.entity(&set); // Newly possible!
```
</details>
## Migration Guide
- `World::get_entity` now returns `Result<_, Entity>` instead of
`Option<_>`.
- Use `world.get_entity(..).ok()` to return to the previous behavior.
- `World::get_entity_mut` and `DeferredWorld::get_entity_mut` now return
`Result<_, EntityFetchError>` instead of `Option<_>`.
- Use `world.get_entity_mut(..).ok()` to return to the previous
behavior.
- Type inference for `World::entity`, `World::entity_mut`,
`World::get_entity`, `World::get_entity_mut`,
`DeferredWorld::entity_mut`, and `DeferredWorld::get_entity_mut` has
changed, and might now require the input argument's type to be
explicitly written when inside closures.
- The following functions have been deprecated, and should be replaced
as such:
- `World::many_entities` -> `World::entity::<[Entity; N]>`
- `World::many_entities_mut` -> `World::entity_mut::<[Entity; N]>`
- `World::get_many_entities` -> `World::get_entity::<[Entity; N]>`
- `World::get_many_entities_dynamic` -> `World::get_entity::<&[Entity]>`
- `World::get_many_entities_mut` -> `World::get_entity_mut::<[Entity;
N]>`
- The equivalent return type has changed from `Result<_,
QueryEntityError>` to `Result<_, EntityFetchError>`
- `World::get_many_entities_dynamic_mut` ->
`World::get_entity_mut::<&[Entity]>1
- The equivalent return type has changed from `Result<_,
QueryEntityError>` to `Result<_, EntityFetchError>`
- `World::get_many_entities_from_set_mut` ->
`World::get_entity_mut::<&EntityHashSet>`
- The equivalent return type has changed from `Result<Vec<EntityMut>,
QueryEntityError>` to `Result<EntityHashMap<EntityMut>,
EntityFetchError>`. If necessary, you can still convert the
`EntityHashMap` into a `Vec`.
