# Objective
- Enable state scoped entities by default
- Provide a way to disable it when needed
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Frankel <ben.frankel7@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#19120
## Solution
Use the find and replace token feature in VSCode to replace all the
`Condition`s with `SystemCondition`s. Then look through all the
documentation with find and replace to replace all the `Condition`s
there.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
Yes, used cargo clippy, cargo build and cargo test.
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
Nope
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
By compiling and running bevy
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
Shouldn't be, but Fedora Linux with KDE Wayland
# Objective
Fixes a part of #14274.
Bevy has an incredibly inconsistent naming convention for its system
sets, both internally and across the ecosystem.
<img alt="System sets in Bevy"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d16e2027-793f-4ba4-9cc9-e780b14a5a1b"
width="450" />
*Names of public system set types in Bevy*
Most Bevy types use a naming of `FooSystem` or just `Foo`, but there are
also a few `FooSystems` and `FooSet` types. In ecosystem crates on the
other hand, `FooSet` is perhaps the most commonly used name in general.
Conventions being so wildly inconsistent can make it harder for users to
pick names for their own types, to search for system sets on docs.rs, or
to even discern which types *are* system sets.
To reign in the inconsistency a bit and help unify the ecosystem, it
would be good to establish a common recommended naming convention for
system sets in Bevy itself, similar to how plugins are commonly suffixed
with `Plugin` (ex: `TimePlugin`). By adopting a consistent naming
convention in first-party Bevy, we can softly nudge ecosystem crates to
follow suit (for types where it makes sense to do so).
Choosing a naming convention is also relevant now, as the [`bevy_cli`
recently adopted
lints](https://github.com/TheBevyFlock/bevy_cli/pull/345) to enforce
naming for plugins and system sets, and the recommended naming used for
system sets is still a bit open.
## Which Name To Use?
Now the contentious part: what naming convention should we actually
adopt?
This was discussed on the Bevy Discord at the end of last year, starting
[here](<https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1310659954683936789>).
`FooSet` and `FooSystems` were the clear favorites, with `FooSet` very
narrowly winning an unofficial poll. However, it seems to me like the
consensus was broadly moving towards `FooSystems` at the end and after
the poll, with Cart
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311140204974706708))
and later Alice
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311092530732859533))
and also me being in favor of it.
Let's do a quick pros and cons list! Of course these are just what I
thought of, so take it with a grain of salt.
`FooSet`:
- Pro: Nice and short!
- Pro: Used by many ecosystem crates.
- Pro: The `Set` suffix comes directly from the trait name `SystemSet`.
- Pro: Pairs nicely with existing APIs like `in_set` and
`configure_sets`.
- Con: `Set` by itself doesn't actually indicate that it's related to
systems *at all*, apart from the implemented trait. A set of what?
- Con: Is `FooSet` a set of `Foo`s or a system set related to `Foo`? Ex:
`ContactSet`, `MeshSet`, `EnemySet`...
`FooSystems`:
- Pro: Very clearly indicates that the type represents a collection of
systems. The actual core concept, system(s), is in the name.
- Pro: Parallels nicely with `FooPlugins` for plugin groups.
- Pro: Low risk of conflicts with other names or misunderstandings about
what the type is.
- Pro: In most cases, reads *very* nicely and clearly. Ex:
`PhysicsSystems` and `AnimationSystems` as opposed to `PhysicsSet` and
`AnimationSet`.
- Pro: Easy to search for on docs.rs.
- Con: Usually results in longer names.
- Con: Not yet as widely used.
Really the big problem with `FooSet` is that it doesn't actually
describe what it is. It describes what *kind of thing* it is (a set of
something), but not *what it is a set of*, unless you know the type or
check its docs or implemented traits. `FooSystems` on the other hand is
much more self-descriptive in this regard, at the cost of being a bit
longer to type.
Ultimately, in some ways it comes down to preference and how you think
of system sets. Personally, I was originally in favor of `FooSet`, but
have been increasingly on the side of `FooSystems`, especially after
seeing what the new names would actually look like in Avian and now
Bevy. I prefer it because it usually reads better, is much more clearly
related to groups of systems than `FooSet`, and overall *feels* more
correct and natural to me in the long term.
For these reasons, and because Alice and Cart also seemed to share a
preference for it when it was previously being discussed, I propose that
we adopt a `FooSystems` naming convention where applicable.
## Solution
Rename Bevy's system set types to use a consistent `FooSet` naming where
applicable.
- `AccessibilitySystem` → `AccessibilitySystems`
- `GizmoRenderSystem` → `GizmoRenderSystems`
- `PickSet` → `PickingSystems`
- `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` → `RunFixedMainLoopSystems`
- `TransformSystem` → `TransformSystems`
- `RemoteSet` → `RemoteSystems`
- `RenderSet` → `RenderSystems`
- `SpriteSystem` → `SpriteSystems`
- `StateTransitionSteps` → `StateTransitionSystems`
- `RenderUiSystem` → `RenderUiSystems`
- `UiSystem` → `UiSystems`
- `Animation` → `AnimationSystems`
- `AssetEvents` → `AssetEventSystems`
- `TrackAssets` → `AssetTrackingSystems`
- `UpdateGizmoMeshes` → `GizmoMeshSystems`
- `InputSystem` → `InputSystems`
- `InputFocusSet` → `InputFocusSystems`
- `ExtractMaterialsSet` → `MaterialExtractionSystems`
- `ExtractMeshesSet` → `MeshExtractionSystems`
- `RumbleSystem` → `RumbleSystems`
- `CameraUpdateSystem` → `CameraUpdateSystems`
- `ExtractAssetsSet` → `AssetExtractionSystems`
- `Update2dText` → `Text2dUpdateSystems`
- `TimeSystem` → `TimeSystems`
- `AudioPlaySet` → `AudioPlaybackSystems`
- `SendEvents` → `EventSenderSystems`
- `EventUpdates` → `EventUpdateSystems`
A lot of the names got slightly longer, but they are also a lot more
consistent, and in my opinion the majority of them read much better. For
a few of the names I took the liberty of rewording things a bit;
definitely open to any further naming improvements.
There are still also cases where the `FooSystems` naming doesn't really
make sense, and those I left alone. This primarily includes system sets
like `Interned<dyn SystemSet>`, `EnterSchedules<S>`, `ExitSchedules<S>`,
or `TransitionSchedules<S>`, where the type has some special purpose and
semantics.
## Todo
- [x] Should I keep all the old names as deprecated type aliases? I can
do this, but to avoid wasting work I'd prefer to first reach consensus
on whether these renames are even desired.
- [x] Migration guide
- [x] Release notes
# Objective
- Alternative to and builds on top of #16284.
- Fixes#15849.
## Solution
- Rename component `StateScoped` to `DespawnOnExitState`.
- Rename system `clear_state_scoped_entities` to
`despawn_entities_on_exit_state`.
- Add `DespawnOnEnterState` and `despawn_entities_on_enter_state` which
is the `OnEnter` equivalent.
> [!NOTE]
> Compared to #16284, the main change is that I did the rename in such a
way as to keep the terms `OnExit` and `OnEnter` together. In my own
game, I was adding `VisibleOnEnterState` and `HiddenOnExitState` and
when naming those, I kept the `OnExit` and `OnEnter` together. When I
checked #16284 it stood out to me that the naming was a bit awkward.
Putting the `State` in the middle and breaking up `OnEnter` and `OnExit`
also breaks searching for those terms.
## Open questions
1. Should we split `enable_state_scoped_entities` into two functions,
one for the `OnEnter` and one for the `OnExit`? I personally have zero
need thus far for the `OnEnter` version, so I'd be interested in not
having this enabled unless I ask for it.
2. If yes to 1., should we follow my lead in my `Visibility` state
components (see below) and name these
`app.enable_despawn_entities_on_enter_state()` and
`app.enable_despawn_entities_on_exit_state()`, which IMO says what it
does on the tin?
## Testing
Ran all changed examples.
## Side note: `VisibleOnEnterState` and `HiddenOnExitState`
For reference to anyone else and to help with the open questions, I'm
including the code I wrote for controlling entity visibility when a
state is entered/exited.
<details>
<summary>visibility.rs</summary>
```rust
use bevy_app::prelude::*;
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
use bevy_reflect::prelude::*;
use bevy_render::prelude::*;
use bevy_state::{prelude::*, state::StateTransitionSteps};
use tracing::*;
pub trait AppExtStates {
fn enable_visible_entities_on_enter_state<S: States>(&mut self) -> &mut Self;
fn enable_hidden_entities_on_exit_state<S: States>(&mut self) -> &mut Self;
}
impl AppExtStates for App {
fn enable_visible_entities_on_enter_state<S: States>(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.main_mut()
.enable_visible_entities_on_enter_state::<S>();
self
}
fn enable_hidden_entities_on_exit_state<S: States>(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.main_mut().enable_hidden_entities_on_exit_state::<S>();
self
}
}
impl AppExtStates for SubApp {
fn enable_visible_entities_on_enter_state<S: States>(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
if !self
.world()
.contains_resource::<Events<StateTransitionEvent<S>>>()
{
let name = core::any::type_name::<S>();
warn!("Visible entities on enter state are enabled for state `{}`, but the state isn't installed in the app!", name);
}
// We work with [`StateTransition`] in set
// [`StateTransitionSteps::ExitSchedules`] as opposed to [`OnExit`],
// because [`OnExit`] only runs for one specific variant of the state.
self.add_systems(
StateTransition,
update_to_visible_on_enter_state::<S>.in_set(StateTransitionSteps::ExitSchedules),
)
}
fn enable_hidden_entities_on_exit_state<S: States>(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
if !self
.world()
.contains_resource::<Events<StateTransitionEvent<S>>>()
{
let name = core::any::type_name::<S>();
warn!("Hidden entities on exit state are enabled for state `{}`, but the state isn't installed in the app!", name);
}
// We work with [`StateTransition`] in set
// [`StateTransitionSteps::ExitSchedules`] as opposed to [`OnExit`],
// because [`OnExit`] only runs for one specific variant of the state.
self.add_systems(
StateTransition,
update_to_hidden_on_exit_state::<S>.in_set(StateTransitionSteps::ExitSchedules),
)
}
}
#[derive(Clone, Component, Debug, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Component, Debug)]
pub struct VisibleOnEnterState<S: States>(pub S);
#[derive(Clone, Component, Debug, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Component, Debug)]
pub struct HiddenOnExitState<S: States>(pub S);
/// Makes entities marked with [`VisibleOnEnterState<S>`] visible when the state
/// `S` is entered.
pub fn update_to_visible_on_enter_state<S: States>(
mut transitions: EventReader<StateTransitionEvent<S>>,
mut query: Query<(&VisibleOnEnterState<S>, &mut Visibility)>,
) {
// We use the latest event, because state machine internals generate at most
// 1 transition event (per type) each frame. No event means no change
// happened and we skip iterating all entities.
let Some(transition) = transitions.read().last() else {
return;
};
if transition.entered == transition.exited {
return;
}
let Some(entered) = &transition.entered else {
return;
};
for (binding, mut visibility) in query.iter_mut() {
if binding.0 == *entered {
visibility.set_if_neq(Visibility::Visible);
}
}
}
/// Makes entities marked with [`HiddenOnExitState<S>`] invisible when the state
/// `S` is exited.
pub fn update_to_hidden_on_exit_state<S: States>(
mut transitions: EventReader<StateTransitionEvent<S>>,
mut query: Query<(&HiddenOnExitState<S>, &mut Visibility)>,
) {
// We use the latest event, because state machine internals generate at most
// 1 transition event (per type) each frame. No event means no change
// happened and we skip iterating all entities.
let Some(transition) = transitions.read().last() else {
return;
};
if transition.entered == transition.exited {
return;
}
let Some(exited) = &transition.exited else {
return;
};
for (binding, mut visibility) in query.iter_mut() {
if binding.0 == *exited {
visibility.set_if_neq(Visibility::Hidden);
}
}
}
```
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <Benjamin.Brienen@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Frankel <ben.frankel7@gmail.com>
# Objective
Prevents duplicate implementation between IntoSystemConfigs and
IntoSystemSetConfigs using a generic, adds a NodeType trait for more
config flexibility (opening the door to implement
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14195?).
## Solution
Followed writeup by @ItsDoot:
https://hackmd.io/@doot/rJeefFHc1x
Removes IntoSystemConfigs and IntoSystemSetConfigs, instead using
IntoNodeConfigs with generics.
## Testing
Pending
---
## Showcase
N/A
## Migration Guide
SystemSetConfigs -> NodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet>
SystemConfigs -> NodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem>
IntoSystemSetConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet, M>
IntoSystemConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem, M>
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
This pr uses the `extern crate self as` trick to make proc macros behave
the same way inside and outside bevy.
# Objective
- Removes noise introduced by `crate as` in the whole bevy repo.
- Fixes#17004.
- Hardens proc macro path resolution.
## TODO
- [x] `BevyManifest` needs cleanup.
- [x] Cleanup remaining `crate as`.
- [x] Add proper integration tests to the ci.
## Notes
- `cargo-manifest-proc-macros` is written by me and based/inspired by
the old `BevyManifest` implementation and
[`bkchr/proc-macro-crate`](https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate).
- What do you think about the new integration test machinery I added to
the `ci`?
More and better integration tests can be added at a later stage.
The goal of these integration tests is to simulate an actual separate
crate that uses bevy. Ideally they would lightly touch all bevy crates.
## Testing
- Needs RA test
- Needs testing from other users
- Others need to run at least `cargo run -p ci integration-test` and
verify that they work.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Contributes to #15460
## Solution
- Added the following features:
- `std` (default)
- `portable-atomic`
- `critical-section`
## Testing
- CI
## Notes
- `portable-atomic`, and `critical-section` are shortcuts to enable the
relevant features in dependencies, making the usage of this crate on
atomically challenged platforms possible and simpler.
- This PR is blocked until #17027 is merged (as it depends on fixes for
the `once!` macro). Once merged, the change-count for this PR should
reduce.
# Objective
- I got tired of calling `enable_state_scoped_entities`, and though it
would make more sense to define that at the place where the state is
defined
## Solution
- add a derive attribute `#[states(scoped_entities)]` when derive
`States` or `SubStates` that enables it automatically when adding the
state
## Testing
- Ran the examples using it, they still work
# Objective
- Fixes#6370
- Closes#6581
## Solution
- Added the following lints to the workspace:
- `std_instead_of_core`
- `std_instead_of_alloc`
- `alloc_instead_of_core`
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [item level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Item%5C%3A)
to split all `use` statements into single items.
- Used `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix
--allow-dirty` to _attempt_ to resolve the new linting issues, and
intervened where the lint was unable to resolve the issue automatically
(usually due to needing an `extern crate alloc;` statement in a crate
root).
- Manually removed certain uses of `std` where negative feature gating
prevented `--all-features` from finding the offending uses.
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [crate level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Crate%5C%3A)
to re-merge all `use` statements matching Bevy's previous styling.
- Manually fixed cases where the `fmt` tool could not re-merge `use`
statements due to conditional compilation attributes.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally
## Migration Guide
The MSRV is now 1.81. Please update to this version or higher.
## Notes
- This is a _massive_ change to try and push through, which is why I've
outlined the semi-automatic steps I used to create this PR, in case this
fails and someone else tries again in the future.
- Making this change has no impact on user code, but does mean Bevy
contributors will be warned to use `core` and `alloc` instead of `std`
where possible.
- This lint is a critical first step towards investigating `no_std`
options for Bevy.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
Make it clear to the user why their program is failing rather than
having an unhelpful `called Option::unwrap() on a None value` message.
## Solution
Change the `unwrap()` calls to `expect()` calls, mirroring previously
implemented error messages.
## Testing
I have not tested these changes, but they are fairly trivial so I do not
necessarily feel they need it.
# Objective
- While developing a debug tool I saw the gap where it was not possible
to get all existing states from a World using reflection.
- This PR allows to iterate over all `States` types that exist in a
world, and modify them in case they implement `FreelyMutableState`.
- Two new methods are available on `App` and `SubApp` as helper to
register the data types:
- `register_state_reflect` and `register_mutable_state_reflect`
## Solution
- Two new data types are added:
- `ReflectState`: Allows to extract the current value of a state from
the World.
- `ReflectFreelyMutableState`: Allows to set the next state in a world,
similar to call `NextState::set`.
- There is no distinction between `States`, `SubStates` and
`ComputedStates`:
- `States` can register both `ReflectState` and
`ReflectFreelyMutableState`.
- `SubStates` can register both `ReflectState` and
`ReflectFreelyMutableState`.
- `ComputedStates` can register only `ReflectState` .
## Testing
- Added tests inside the `bevy_state` crate.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
# Objective
Clarify that `StatesPlugin` is a prerequisite for state code.
Closes#14329 .
Edit: am I missing a way to link `DefaultPlugins` correctly other than
using the URL? I guess I expected to be able to refer to it with
`bevy::prelude::DefaultPlugins` or some such 🤔
# Objective
- Helps improve https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14151
## Solution
- At least return an error message from the `Option::unwrap()` call when
we try to access the `StateTransition` schedule
---------
Co-authored-by: Martín Maita <47983254+mnmaita@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- Bevy currently has lot of invalid intra-doc links, let's fix them!
- Also make CI test them, to avoid future regressions.
- Helps with #1983 (but doesn't fix it, as there could still be explicit
links to docs.rs that are broken)
## Solution
- Make `cargo r -p ci -- doc-check` check fail on warnings (could also
be changed to just some specific lints)
- Manually fix all the warnings (note that in some cases it was unclear
to me what the fix should have been, I'll try to highlight them in a
self-review)
# Objective
- Often in games you will want to create chains of systems that modify
some event. For example, a chain of damage systems that handle a
DamageEvent and modify the underlying value before the health system
finally consumes the event. Right now this requires either:
* Using a component added to the entity
* Consuming and refiring events
Neither is ideal when really all we want to do is read the events value,
modify it, and write it back.
## Solution
- Create an EventMutator class similar to EventReader but with ResMut<T>
and iterators that return &mut so that events can be mutated.
## Testing
- I replicated all the existing tests for EventReader to make sure
behavior was the same (I believe) and added a number of tests specific
to testing that 1) events can actually be mutated, and that 2)
EventReader sees changes from EventMutator for events it hasn't already
seen.
## Migration Guide
Users currently using `ManualEventReader` should use `EventCursor`
instead. `ManualEventReader` will be removed in Bevy 0.16. Additionally,
`Events::get_reader` has been replaced by `Events::get_cursor`.
Users currently directly accessing the `Events` resource for mutation
should move to `EventMutator` if possible.
---------
Co-authored-by: poopy <gonesbird@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#13920
## Solution
As described in the issue.
## Testing
Moved a custom transition plugin in example before any of the app-state
methods.
# Objective
Fixes#13845
## Solution
Fix inline docs links inside `init_state` and `insert_state`.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
Manually checked on `cargo doc` and `rust-analyzer lsp`.
# Objective
- Fixes#13874
## Solution
- Confirm that the `StatesPlugin` is installed when trying to add
states.
- Skipped for state scoped entities, since those will warn about missing
states.
# Objective
- Fixes#13844
- Warn user when initializing state multiple times
## Solution
- `insert_state` will overwrite previously initialized state value,
reset transition events and re-insert it's own transition event.
- `init_state`, `add_sub_state`, `add_computed_state` are idempotent, so
calling them multiple times will emit a warning.
## Testing
- 2 tests confirming overwrite works.
- Given the example from #13844
```rs
use bevy::prelude::*;
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
.insert_state(AppState::A)
.insert_state(AppState::B)
.add_systems(OnEnter(AppState::A), setup_a)
.add_systems(OnEnter(AppState::B), setup_b)
.add_systems(OnExit(AppState::A), cleanup_a)
.add_systems(OnExit(AppState::B), cleanup_b)
.run();
}
#[derive(States, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
enum AppState {
A,
B,
}
fn setup_a() {
info!("setting up A");
}
fn setup_b() {
info!("setting up B");
}
fn cleanup_a() {
info!("cleaning up A");
}
fn cleanup_b() {
info!("cleaning up B");
}
```
We get the following result:
```
INFO states: setting up B
```
which matches our expectations.
# Objective
- In #13649 additional method had been added to AppExitStates, but there
feature gate left for method in implementation for App at refactoring
stage.
- Fixes#13733 .
## Solution
- Removed the feature gate.
## Testing
- Ran reproducing example from #13733 with no compilation errors
# Objective
Move `StateScoped` and `log_transitions` to `bevy_state`, since they're
useful for end users.
Addresses #12852, although not in the way the issue had in mind.
## Solution
- Added `bevy_hierarchy` to default features of `bevy_state`.
- Move `log_transitions` to `transitions` module.
- Move `StateScoped` to `state_scoped` module, gated behind
`bevy_hierarchy` feature.
- Refreshed implementation.
- Added `enable_state_coped_entities<S: States>()` to add required
machinery to `App` for clearing state-scoped entities.
## Changelog
- Added `log_transitions` for displaying state transitions.
- Added `StateScoped` for binding entity lifetime to state and app
`enable_state_coped_entities` to register cleaning behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
After separating `bevy_states`, state installation methods like
`init_state` were kept in `bevy_app` under the `bevy_state` feature
flag.
This is problematic, because `bevy_state` is not a core module,
`bevy_app` is, yet it depends on `bevy_state`.
This causes practical problems like the inability to use
`bevy_hierarchy` inside `bevy_state`, because of circular dependencies.
## Solution
- `bevy_state` now has a `bevy_app` feature flag, which gates the new
`AppStateExt` trait.
All previous state installation methods were moved to this trait.
It's implemented for both `SubApp` and `App`.
## Changelog
- All state related app methods are now in `AppExtStates` trait in
`bevy_state`.
- Added `StatesPlugin` which is in `DefaultPlugins` when `bevy_state` is
enabled.
## Migration Guide
`App::init_state` is now provided by the
`bevy_state::app::AppExtStates;` trait: import it if you need this
method and are not blob-importing the `bevy` prelude.
