Commit Graph

24 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
charlotte
dd812b3e49
Type safe retained render world (#15756)
# Objective

In the Render World, there are a number of collections that are derived
from Main World entities and are used to drive rendering. The most
notable are:
- `VisibleEntities`, which is generated in the `check_visibility` system
and contains visible entities for a view.
- `ExtractedInstances`, which maps entity ids to asset ids.

In the old model, these collections were trivially kept in sync -- any
extracted phase item could look itself up because the render entity id
was guaranteed to always match the corresponding main world id.

After #15320, this became much more complicated, and was leading to a
number of subtle bugs in the Render World. The main rendering systems,
i.e. `queue_material_meshes` and `queue_material2d_meshes`, follow a
similar pattern:

```rust
for visible_entity in visible_entities.iter::<With<Mesh2d>>() {
    let Some(mesh_instance) = render_mesh_instances.get_mut(visible_entity) else {
        continue;
    };
            
    // Look some more stuff up and specialize the pipeline...
            
    let bin_key = Opaque2dBinKey {
        pipeline: pipeline_id,
        draw_function: draw_opaque_2d,
        asset_id: mesh_instance.mesh_asset_id.into(),
        material_bind_group_id: material_2d.get_bind_group_id().0,
    };
    opaque_phase.add(
        bin_key,
        *visible_entity,
        BinnedRenderPhaseType::mesh(mesh_instance.automatic_batching),
    );
}
```

In this case, `visible_entities` and `render_mesh_instances` are both
collections that are created and keyed by Main World entity ids, and so
this lookup happens to work by coincidence. However, there is a major
unintentional bug here: namely, because `visible_entities` is a
collection of Main World ids, the phase item being queued is created
with a Main World id rather than its correct Render World id.

This happens to not break mesh rendering because the render commands
used for drawing meshes do not access the `ItemQuery` parameter, but
demonstrates the confusion that is now possible: our UI phase items are
correctly being queued with Render World ids while our meshes aren't.

Additionally, this makes it very easy and error prone to use the wrong
entity id to look up things like assets. For example, if instead we
ignored visibility checks and queued our meshes via a query, we'd have
to be extra careful to use `&MainEntity` instead of the natural
`Entity`.

## Solution

Make all collections that are derived from Main World data use
`MainEntity` as their key, to ensure type safety and avoid accidentally
looking up data with the wrong entity id:

```rust
pub type MainEntityHashMap<V> = hashbrown::HashMap<MainEntity, V, EntityHash>;
```

Additionally, we make all `PhaseItem` be able to provide both their Main
and Render World ids, to allow render phase implementors maximum
flexibility as to what id should be used to look up data.

You can think of this like tracking at the type level whether something
in the Render World should use it's "primary key", i.e. entity id, or
needs to use a foreign key, i.e. `MainEntity`.

## Testing

##### TODO:

This will require extensive testing to make sure things didn't break!
Additionally, some extraction logic has become more complicated and
needs to be checked for regressions.

## Migration Guide

With the advent of the retained render world, collections that contain
references to `Entity` that are extracted into the render world have
been changed to contain `MainEntity` in order to prevent errors where a
render world entity id is used to look up an item by accident. Custom
rendering code may need to be changed to query for `&MainEntity` in
order to look up the correct item from such a collection. Additionally,
users who implement their own extraction logic for collections of main
world entity should strongly consider extracting into a different
collection that uses `MainEntity` as a key.

Additionally, render phases now require specifying both the `Entity` and
`MainEntity` for a given `PhaseItem`. Custom render phases should ensure
`MainEntity` is available when queuing a phase item.
2024-10-10 18:47:04 +00:00
Kristoffer Søholm
2d1b4939d2
Synchronize removed components with the render world (#15582)
# Objective

Fixes #15560
Fixes (most of) #15570

Currently a lot of examples (and presumably some user code) depend on
toggling certain render features by adding/removing a single component
to an entity, e.g. `SpotLight` to toggle a light. Because of the
retained render world this no longer works: Extract will add any new
components, but when it is removed the entity persists unchanged in the
render world.

## Solution

Add `SyncComponentPlugin<C: Component>` that registers
`SyncToRenderWorld` as a required component for `C`, and adds a
component hook that will clear all components from the render world
entity when `C` is removed. We add this plugin to
`ExtractComponentPlugin` which fixes most instances of the problem. For
custom extraction logic we can manually add `SyncComponentPlugin` for
that component.

We also rename `WorldSyncPlugin` to `SyncWorldPlugin` so we start a
naming convention like all the `Extract` plugins.

In this PR I also fixed a bunch of breakage related to the retained
render world, stemming from old code that assumed that `Entity` would be
the same in both worlds.

I found that using the `RenderEntity` wrapper instead of `Entity` in
data structures when referring to render world entities makes intent
much clearer, so I propose we make this an official pattern.

## Testing

Run examples like

```
cargo run --features pbr_multi_layer_material_textures --example clearcoat
cargo run --example volumetric_fog
```

and see that they work, and that toggles work correctly. But really we
should test every single example, as we might not even have caught all
the breakage yet.

---

## Migration Guide

The retained render world notes should be updated to explain this edge
case and `SyncComponentPlugin`

---------

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Trashtalk217 <trashtalk217@gmail.com>
2024-10-08 22:23:17 +00:00
Joona Aalto
54006b107b
Migrate meshes and materials to required components (#15524)
# Objective

A big step in the migration to required components: meshes and
materials!

## Solution

As per the [selected
proposal](https://hackmd.io/@bevy/required_components/%2Fj9-PnF-2QKK0on1KQ29UWQ):

- Deprecate `MaterialMesh2dBundle`, `MaterialMeshBundle`, and
`PbrBundle`.
- Add `Mesh2d` and `Mesh3d` components, which wrap a `Handle<Mesh>`.
- Add `MeshMaterial2d<M: Material2d>` and `MeshMaterial3d<M: Material>`,
which wrap a `Handle<M>`.
- Meshes *without* a mesh material should be rendered with a default
material. The existence of a material is determined by
`HasMaterial2d`/`HasMaterial3d`, which is required by
`MeshMaterial2d`/`MeshMaterial3d`. This gets around problems with the
generics.

Previously:

```rust
commands.spawn(MaterialMesh2dBundle {
    mesh: meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0)).into(),
    material: materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5)),
    transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)),
    ..default()
});
```

Now:

```rust
commands.spawn((
    Mesh2d(meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0))),
    MeshMaterial2d(materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5))),
    Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)),
));
```

If the mesh material is missing, previously nothing was rendered. Now,
it renders a white default `ColorMaterial` in 2D and a
`StandardMaterial` in 3D (this can be overridden). Below, only every
other entity has a material:

![Näyttökuva 2024-09-29
181746](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5c8be029-d2fe-4b8c-ae89-17a72ff82c9a)

![Näyttökuva 2024-09-29
181918](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/58adbc55-5a1e-4c7d-a2c7-ed456227b909)

Why white? This is still open for discussion, but I think white makes
sense for a *default* material, while *invalid* asset handles pointing
to nothing should have something like a pink material to indicate that
something is broken (I don't handle that in this PR yet). This is kind
of a mix of Godot and Unity: Godot just renders a white material for
non-existent materials, while Unity renders nothing when no materials
exist, but renders pink for invalid materials. I can also change the
default material to pink if that is preferable though.

## Testing

I ran some 2D and 3D examples to test if anything changed visually. I
have not tested all examples or features yet however. If anyone wants to
test more extensively, it would be appreciated!

## Implementation Notes

- The relationship between `bevy_render` and `bevy_pbr` is weird here.
`bevy_render` needs `Mesh3d` for its own systems, but `bevy_pbr` has all
of the material logic, and `bevy_render` doesn't depend on it. I feel
like the two crates should be refactored in some way, but I think that's
out of scope for this PR.
- I didn't migrate meshlets to required components yet. That can
probably be done in a follow-up, as this is already a huge PR.
- It is becoming increasingly clear to me that we really, *really* want
to disallow raw asset handles as components. They caused me a *ton* of
headache here already, and it took me a long time to find every place
that queried for them or inserted them directly on entities, since there
were no compiler errors for it. If we don't remove the `Component`
derive, I expect raw asset handles to be a *huge* footgun for users as
we transition to wrapper components, especially as handles as components
have been the norm so far. I personally consider this to be a blocker
for 0.15: we need to migrate to wrapper components for asset handles
everywhere, and remove the `Component` derive. Also see
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14124.

---

## Migration Guide

Asset handles for meshes and mesh materials must now be wrapped in the
`Mesh2d` and `MeshMaterial2d` or `Mesh3d` and `MeshMaterial3d`
components for 2D and 3D respectively. Raw handles as components no
longer render meshes.

Additionally, `MaterialMesh2dBundle`, `MaterialMeshBundle`, and
`PbrBundle` have been deprecated. Instead, use the mesh and material
components directly.

Previously:

```rust
commands.spawn(MaterialMesh2dBundle {
    mesh: meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0)).into(),
    material: materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5)),
    transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)),
    ..default()
});
```

Now:

```rust
commands.spawn((
    Mesh2d(meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0))),
    MeshMaterial2d(materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5))),
    Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)),
));
```

If the mesh material is missing, a white default material is now used.
Previously, nothing was rendered if the material was missing.

The `WithMesh2d` and `WithMesh3d` query filter type aliases have also
been removed. Simply use `With<Mesh2d>` or `With<Mesh3d>`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Tim Blackbird <justthecooldude@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2024-10-01 21:33:17 +00:00
Joona Aalto
de888a373d
Migrate lights to required components (#15554)
# Objective

Another step in the migration to required components: lights!

Note that this does not include `EnvironmentMapLight` or reflection
probes yet, because their API hasn't been fully chosen yet.

## Solution

As per the [selected
proposals](https://hackmd.io/@bevy/required_components/%2FLLnzwz9XTxiD7i2jiUXkJg):

- Deprecate `PointLightBundle` in favor of the `PointLight` component
- Deprecate `SpotLightBundle` in favor of the `PointLight` component
- Deprecate `DirectionalLightBundle` in favor of the `DirectionalLight`
component

## Testing

I ran some examples with lights.

---

## Migration Guide

`PointLightBundle`, `SpotLightBundle`, and `DirectionalLightBundle` have
been deprecated. Use the `PointLight`, `SpotLight`, and
`DirectionalLight` components instead. Adding them will now insert the
other components required by them automatically.
2024-10-01 03:20:43 +00:00
Trashtalk217
56f8e526dd
The Cooler 'Retain Rendering World' (#15320)
- Adopted from #14449
- Still fixes #12144.

## Migration Guide

The retained render world is a complex change: migrating might take one
of a few different forms depending on the patterns you're using.

For every example, we specify in which world the code is run. Most of
the changes affect render world code, so for the average Bevy user who's
using Bevy's high-level rendering APIs, these changes are unlikely to
affect your code.

### Spawning entities in the render world

Previously, if you spawned an entity with `world.spawn(...)`,
`commands.spawn(...)` or some other method in the rendering world, it
would be despawned at the end of each frame. In 0.15, this is no longer
the case and so your old code could leak entities. This can be mitigated
by either re-architecting your code to no longer continuously spawn
entities (like you're used to in the main world), or by adding the
`bevy_render::world_sync::TemporaryRenderEntity` component to the entity
you're spawning. Entities tagged with `TemporaryRenderEntity` will be
removed at the end of each frame (like before).

### Extract components with `ExtractComponentPlugin`

```
// main world
app.add_plugins(ExtractComponentPlugin::<ComponentToExtract>::default());
```

`ExtractComponentPlugin` has been changed to only work with synced
entities. Entities are automatically synced if `ComponentToExtract` is
added to them. However, entities are not "unsynced" if any given
`ComponentToExtract` is removed, because an entity may have multiple
components to extract. This would cause the other components to no
longer get extracted because the entity is not synced.

So be careful when only removing extracted components from entities in
the render world, because it might leave an entity behind in the render
world. The solution here is to avoid only removing extracted components
and instead despawn the entire entity.

### Manual extraction using `Extract<Query<(Entity, ...)>>`

```rust
// in render world, inspired by bevy_pbr/src/cluster/mod.rs
pub fn extract_clusters(
    mut commands: Commands,
    views: Extract<Query<(Entity, &Clusters, &Camera)>>,
) {
    for (entity, clusters, camera) in &views {
        // some code
        commands.get_or_spawn(entity).insert(...);
    }
}
```
One of the primary consequences of the retained rendering world is that
there's no longer a one-to-one mapping from entity IDs in the main world
to entity IDs in the render world. Unlike in Bevy 0.14, Entity 42 in the
main world doesn't necessarily map to entity 42 in the render world.

Previous code which called `get_or_spawn(main_world_entity)` in the
render world (`Extract<Query<(Entity, ...)>>` returns main world
entities). Instead, you should use `&RenderEntity` and
`render_entity.id()` to get the correct entity in the render world. Note
that this entity does need to be synced first in order to have a
`RenderEntity`.

When performing manual abstraction, this won't happen automatically
(like with `ExtractComponentPlugin`) so add a `SyncToRenderWorld` marker
component to the entities you want to extract.

This results in the following code:
```rust
// in render world, inspired by bevy_pbr/src/cluster/mod.rs
pub fn extract_clusters(
    mut commands: Commands,
    views: Extract<Query<(&RenderEntity, &Clusters, &Camera)>>,
) {
    for (render_entity, clusters, camera) in &views {
        // some code
        commands.get_or_spawn(render_entity.id()).insert(...);
    }
}

// in main world, when spawning
world.spawn(Clusters::default(), Camera::default(), SyncToRenderWorld)
```

### Looking up `Entity` ids in the render world

As previously stated, there's now no correspondence between main world
and render world `Entity` identifiers.

Querying for `Entity` in the render world will return the `Entity` id in
the render world: query for `MainEntity` (and use its `id()` method) to
get the corresponding entity in the main world.

This is also a good way to tell the difference between synced and
unsynced entities in the render world, because unsynced entities won't
have a `MainEntity` component.

---------

Co-authored-by: re0312 <re0312@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: re0312 <45868716+re0312@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Periwink <charlesbour@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anselmo Sampietro <ans.samp@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Emerson Coskey <56370779+ecoskey@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-09-30 18:51:43 +00:00
Clar Fon
efda7f3f9c
Simpler lint fixes: makes ci lints work but disables a lint for now (#15376)
Takes the first two commits from #15375 and adds suggestions from this
comment:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15375#issuecomment-2366968300

See #15375 for more reasoning/motivation.

## Rebasing (rerunning)

```rust
git switch simpler-lint-fixes
git reset --hard main
cargo fmt --all -- --unstable-features --config normalize_comments=true,imports_granularity=Crate
cargo fmt --all
git add --update
git commit --message "rustfmt"
cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix
cargo fmt --all -- --unstable-features --config normalize_comments=true,imports_granularity=Crate
cargo fmt --all
git add --update
git commit --message "clippy"
git cherry-pick e6c0b94f6795222310fb812fa5c4512661fc7887
```
2024-09-24 11:42:59 +00:00
Blazepaws
b6b28a621f
Reflect derived traits on all components and resources: bevy_pbr (#15224)
Solves https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/15187 for bevy_pbr
2024-09-15 16:07:30 +00:00
re0312
36c6f29832
Lighting Should Only hold Vec<Entity> instead of TypeId<Vec<Entity>> (#14073)
# Objective
- After #13894, I noticed the performance of `many_lights `dropped from
120+ to 60+. I reviewed the PR but couldn't identify any mistakes. After
profiling, I discovered that `Hashmap::Clone `was very slow when its not
empty, causing `extract_light` to increase from 3ms to 8ms.
- Lighting only checks visibility for 3D Meshes. We don't need to
maintain a TypeIdMap for this, as it not only impacts performance
negatively but also reduces ergonomics.

## Solution

- use VisibleMeshEntities for lighint visibility checking.


## Performance
cargo run --release --example many_lights  --features bevy/trace_tracy 
name="bevy_pbr::light::check_point_light_mesh_visibility"}

![image](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/45868716/8bad061a-f936-45a0-9bb9-4fbdaceec08b)

system{name="bevy_pbr::render::light::extract_lights"}

![image](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/45868716/ca75b46c-b4ad-45d3-8c8d-66442447b753)


## Migration Guide

> now `SpotLightBundle` , `CascadesVisibleEntities `and
`CubemapVisibleEntities `use VisibleMeshEntities instead of
`VisibleEntities`

---------

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2024-07-14 17:00:54 +00:00
Brezak
368c5cef1a
Implement clone for most bundles. (#12993)
# Objective

Closes #12985.

## Solution

- Derive clone for most types with bundle in their name.
- Bundle types missing clone:
-
[`TextBundle`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/prelude/struct.TextBundle.html)
(Contains
[`ContentSize`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/ui/struct.ContentSize.html)
which can't be cloned because it itself contains a `Option<MeasureFunc>`
where
[`MeasureFunc`](https://docs.rs/taffy/0.3.18/taffy/node/enum.MeasureFunc.html)
isn't clone)
-
[`ImageBundle`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/prelude/struct.ImageBundle.html)
(Same as `TextBundle`)
-
[`AtlasImageBundle`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/prelude/struct.AtlasImageBundle.html)
(Will be deprecated in 0.14 there's no point)
2024-04-16 16:37:09 +00:00
Doonv
1c67e020f7
Move EntityHash related types into bevy_ecs (#11498)
# Objective

Reduce the size of `bevy_utils`
(https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/11478)

## Solution

Move `EntityHash` related types into `bevy_ecs`. This also allows us
access to `Entity`, which means we no longer need `EntityHashMap`'s
first generic argument.

---

## Changelog

- Moved `bevy::utils::{EntityHash, EntityHasher, EntityHashMap,
EntityHashSet}` into `bevy::ecs::entity::hash` .
- Removed `EntityHashMap`'s first generic argument. It is now hardcoded
to always be `Entity`.

## Migration Guide

- Uses of `bevy::utils::{EntityHash, EntityHasher, EntityHashMap,
EntityHashSet}` now have to be imported from `bevy::ecs::entity::hash`.
- Uses of `EntityHashMap` no longer have to specify the first generic
parameter. It is now hardcoded to always be `Entity`.
2024-02-12 15:02:24 +00:00
vero
4695b82f6b
Use EntityHashMap whenever possible (#11353)
# Objective

Fixes #11352

## Solution

- Use `EntityHashMap<Entity, T>` instead of `HashMap<Entity, T>`

---

## Changelog

Changed
- Use `EntityHashMap<Entity, T>` instead of `HashMap<Entity, T>`
whenever possible

## Migration Guide

TODO
2024-01-15 15:51:17 +00:00
Joseph
87f7d013c0
Fix a typo in DirectionalLightBundle (#9861)
# Objective

Fix a typo introduced by #9497. While drafting the PR, the type was
originally called `VisibleInHierarchy` before I renamed it to
`InheritedVisibility`, but this field got left behind due to a typo.
2023-09-20 04:44:56 +00:00
Joseph
02b520b4e8
Split ComputedVisibility into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective

Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.

The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.

At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:

1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.

## Solution

Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.

Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.

---

## Changelog

- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.

## Migration Guide

The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
 with `ViewVisibility::get`.
 
 ```rust
 // Before:
 commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
     visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
     computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
 });
 
 // After:
 commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
     visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
     inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
     view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
 });
 ```
 
 ```rust
 // Before:
 fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
     for vis in &q {
         if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
     
 // After:
 fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
     for inherited_visibility in &q {
         if inherited_visibility.get() {
 ```
 
 ```rust
 // Before:
 fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
     for vis in &q {
         if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
     
 // After:
 fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
     for view_visibility in &q {
         if view_visibility.get() {
 ```
 
 ```rust
 // Before:
 fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
     for vis in &mut q {
         vis.set_visible_in_view();
     
 // After:
 fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
     for view_visibility in &mut q {
         view_visibility.set();
 ```

---------

Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
Gino Valente
aeeb20ec4c
bevy_reflect: FromReflect Ergonomics Implementation (#6056)
# Objective

**This implementation is based on
https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/59.**

---

Resolves #4597

Full details and motivation can be found in the RFC, but here's a brief
summary.

`FromReflect` is a very powerful and important trait within the
reflection API. It allows Dynamic types (e.g., `DynamicList`, etc.) to
be formed into Real ones (e.g., `Vec<i32>`, etc.).

This mainly comes into play concerning deserialization, where the
reflection deserializers both return a `Box<dyn Reflect>` that almost
always contain one of these Dynamic representations of a Real type. To
convert this to our Real type, we need to use `FromReflect`.

It also sneaks up in other ways. For example, it's a required bound for
`T` in `Vec<T>` so that `Vec<T>` as a whole can be made `FromReflect`.
It's also required by all fields of an enum as it's used as part of the
`Reflect::apply` implementation.

So in other words, much like `GetTypeRegistration` and `Typed`, it is
very much a core reflection trait.

The problem is that it is not currently treated like a core trait and is
not automatically derived alongside `Reflect`. This makes using it a bit
cumbersome and easy to forget.

## Solution

Automatically derive `FromReflect` when deriving `Reflect`.

Users can then choose to opt-out if needed using the
`#[reflect(from_reflect = false)]` attribute.

```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct Foo;

#[derive(Reflect)]
#[reflect(from_reflect = false)]
struct Bar;

fn test<T: FromReflect>(value: T) {}

test(Foo); // <-- OK
test(Bar); // <-- Panic! Bar does not implement trait `FromReflect`
```

#### `ReflectFromReflect`

This PR also automatically adds the `ReflectFromReflect` (introduced in
#6245) registration to the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl— if the
type hasn't opted out of `FromReflect` of course.

<details>
<summary><h4>Improved Deserialization</h4></summary>

> **Warning**
> This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this
PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly
leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference
when implementing this logic again.

And since we can do all the above, we might as well improve
deserialization. We can now choose to deserialize into a Dynamic type or
automatically convert it using `FromReflect` under the hood.

`[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new` will now perform the conversion and
return the `Box`'d Real type.

`[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` will work like what we have
now and simply return the `Box`'d Dynamic type.

```rust
// Returns the Real type
let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry);
let mut deserializer = ron:🇩🇪:Deserializer::from_str(input)?;

let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?;

// Returns the Dynamic type
let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry);
let mut deserializer = ron:🇩🇪:Deserializer::from_str(input)?;

let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?;
```

</details>

---

## Changelog

* `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive
macro
* This includes auto-registering `ReflectFromReflect` in the derived
`GetTypeRegistration` impl
* ~~Renamed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and
`UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to
`TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and
`UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic`, respectively~~ **Descoped**
* ~~Changed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and
`UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to automatically convert the
deserialized output using `FromReflect`~~ **Descoped**

## Migration Guide

* `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive
macro. Items with both derives will need to remove the `FromReflect`
one.

  ```rust
  // OLD
  #[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
  struct Foo;
  
  // NEW
  #[derive(Reflect)]
  struct Foo;
  ```

If using a manual implementation of `FromReflect` and the `Reflect`
derive, users will need to opt-out of the automatic implementation.

  ```rust
  // OLD
  #[derive(Reflect)]
  struct Foo;
  
  impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */}
  
  // NEW
  #[derive(Reflect)]
  #[reflect(from_reflect = false)]
  struct Foo;
  
  impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */}
  ```

<details>
<summary><h4>Removed Migrations</h4></summary>

> **Warning**
> This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this
PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly
leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference
when implementing this logic again.

* The reflect deserializers now perform a `FromReflect` conversion
internally. The expected output of `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and
`UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` is no longer a Dynamic (e.g.,
`DynamicList`), but its Real counterpart (e.g., `Vec<i32>`).

  ```rust
let reflect_deserializer =
UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry);
  let mut deserializer = ron:🇩🇪:Deserializer::from_str(input)?;
  
  // OLD
let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut
deserializer)?.take()?;
  
  // NEW
let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut
deserializer)?.take()?;
  ```

Alternatively, if this behavior isn't desired, use the
`TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and
`UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` methods instead:

  ```rust
  // OLD
  let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry);
  
  // NEW
let reflect_deserializer =
UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry);
  ```

</details>

---------

Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-06-29 01:31:34 +00:00
Raffaele Ragni
7fc6db32ce
Add FromReflect where Reflect is used (#8776)
# Objective

Discovered that PointLight did not implement FromReflect. Adding
FromReflect where Reflect is used. I overreached and applied this rule
everywhere there was a Reflect without a FromReflect, except from where
the compiler wouldn't allow me.

Based from question: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/8774

## Solution

- Adding FromReflect where Reflect was already derived

## Notes

First PR I do in this ecosystem, so not sure if this is the usual
approach, that is, to touch many files at once.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2023-06-19 16:18:17 +00:00
Daniel Chia
c3a46822e1 Cascaded shadow maps. (#7064)
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>

# Objective

Implements cascaded shadow maps for directional lights, which produces better quality shadows without needing excessively large shadow maps.

Fixes #3629

Before
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1222141/210061203-bbd965a4-8d11-4cec-9a88-67fc59d0819f.png)

After
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1222141/210061334-2ff15334-e6d7-4a31-9314-f34a7805cac6.png)


## Solution

Rather than rendering a single shadow map for directional light, the view frustum is divided into a series of cascades, each of which gets its own shadow map. The correct cascade is then sampled for shadow determination.

---

## Changelog

Directional lights now use cascaded shadow maps for improved shadow quality.


## Migration Guide

You no longer have to manually specify a `shadow_projection` for a directional light, and these settings should be removed. If customization of how cascaded shadow maps work is desired, modify the `CascadeShadowConfig` component instead.
2023-01-25 12:35:39 +00:00
Carter Anderson
40d4992401 Visibilty Inheritance, universal ComputedVisibility and RenderLayers support (#5310)
# Objective

Fixes #4907. Fixes #838. Fixes #5089.
Supersedes #5146. Supersedes #2087. Supersedes #865. Supersedes #5114

Visibility is currently entirely local. Set a parent entity to be invisible, and the children are still visible. This makes it hard for users to hide entire hierarchies of entities.

Additionally, the semantics of `Visibility` vs `ComputedVisibility` are inconsistent across entity types. 3D meshes use `ComputedVisibility` as the "definitive" visibility component, with `Visibility` being just one data source. Sprites just use `Visibility`, which means they can't feed off of `ComputedVisibility` data, such as culling information, RenderLayers, and (added in this pr) visibility inheritance information.

## Solution

Splits `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible` into `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_view` and `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_hierarchy`. For each visible entity, `is_visible_in_hierarchy` is computed by propagating visibility down the hierarchy. The `ComputedVisibility::is_visible()` function combines these two booleans for the canonical "is this entity visible" function.

Additionally, all entities that have `Visibility` now also have `ComputedVisibility`.  Sprites, Lights, and UI entities now use `ComputedVisibility` when appropriate.

This means that in addition to visibility inheritance, everything using Visibility now also supports RenderLayers. Notably, Sprites (and other 2d objects) now support `RenderLayers` and work properly across multiple views.

Also note that this does increase the amount of work done per sprite. Bevymark with 100,000 sprites on `main` runs in `0.017612` seconds and this runs in `0.01902`. That is certainly a gap, but I believe the api consistency and extra functionality this buys us is worth it. See [this thread](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for more info. Note that #5146 in combination with #5114 _are_ a viable alternative to this PR and _would_ perform better, but that comes at the cost of api inconsistencies and doing visibility calculations in the "wrong" place. The current visibility system does have potential for performance improvements. I would prefer to evolve that one system as a whole rather than doing custom hacks / different behaviors for each feature slice.

Here is a "split screen" example where the left camera uses RenderLayers to filter out the blue sprite.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/178814868-2e9a2173-bf8c-4c79-8815-633899d492c3.png)


Note that this builds directly on #5146 and that @james7132 deserves the credit for the baseline visibility inheritance work. This pr moves the inherited visibility field into `ComputedVisibility`, then does the additional work of porting everything to `ComputedVisibility`. See my [comments here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for rationale. 

## Follow up work

* Now that lights use ComputedVisibility, VisibleEntities now includes "visible lights" in the entity list. Functionally not a problem as we use queries to filter the list down in the desired context. But we should consider splitting this out into a separate`VisibleLights` collection for both clarity and performance reasons. And _maybe_ even consider scoping `VisibleEntities` down to `VisibleMeshes`?.
* Investigate alternative sprite rendering impls (in combination with visibility system tweaks) that avoid re-generating a per-view fixedbitset of visible entities every frame, then checking each ExtractedEntity. This is where most of the performance overhead lives. Ex: we could generate ExtractedEntities per-view using the VisibleEntities list, avoiding the need for the bitset.
* Should ComputedVisibility use bitflags under the hood? This would cut down on the size of the component, potentially speed up the `is_visible()` function, and allow us to cheaply expand ComputedVisibility with more data (ex: split out local visibility and parent visibility, add more culling classes, etc).
---

## Changelog

* ComputedVisibility now takes hierarchy visibility into account.
* 2D, UI and Light entities now use the ComputedVisibility component.

## Migration Guide

If you were previously reading `Visibility::is_visible` as the "actual visibility" for sprites or lights, use `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible()` instead:

```rust
// before (0.7)
fn system(query: Query<&Visibility>) {
  for visibility in query.iter() {
    if visibility.is_visible {
       log!("found visible entity");
    }
  }
}

// after (0.8)
fn system(query: Query<&ComputedVisibility>) {
  for visibility in query.iter() {
    if visibility.is_visible() {
       log!("found visible entity");
    }
  }
}
``` 


Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-07-15 23:24:42 +00:00
robtfm
132950cd55 Spotlights (#4715)
# Objective

add spotlight support

## Solution / Changelog

- add spotlight angles (inner, outer) to ``PointLight`` struct. emitted light is linearly attenuated from 100% to 0% as angle tends from inner to outer. Direction is taken from the existing transform rotation.
- add spotlight direction (vec3) and angles (f32,f32) to ``GpuPointLight`` struct (60 bytes -> 80 bytes) in ``pbr/render/lights.rs`` and ``mesh_view_bind_group.wgsl``
- reduce no-buffer-support max point light count to 204 due to above
- use spotlight data to attenuate light in ``pbr.wgsl``
- do additional cluster culling on spotlights to minimise cost in ``assign_lights_to_clusters``
- changed one of the lights in the lighting demo to a spotlight
- also added a ``spotlight`` demo - probably not justified but so reviewers can see it more easily

## notes

increasing the size of the GpuPointLight struct on my machine reduces the FPS of ``many_lights -- sphere`` from ~150fps to 140fps. 

i thought this was a reasonable tradeoff, and felt better than handling spotlights separately which is possible but would mean introducing a new bind group, refactoring light-assignment code and adding new spotlight-specific code in pbr.wgsl. the FPS impact for smaller numbers of lights should be very small.

the cluster culling strategy reintroduces the cluster aabb code which was recently removed... sorry. the aabb is used to get a cluster bounding sphere, which can then be tested fairly efficiently using the strategy described at the end of https://bartwronski.com/2017/04/13/cull-that-cone/. this works well with roughly cubic clusters (where the cluster z size is close to the same as x/y size), less well for other cases like single Z slice / tiled forward rendering. In the worst case we will end up just keeping the culling of the equivalent point light.

Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2022-07-08 19:57:43 +00:00
Carter Anderson
747b0c69b0 Better Materials: AsBindGroup trait and derive, simpler Material trait (#5053)
# Objective

This PR reworks Bevy's Material system, making the user experience of defining Materials _much_ nicer. Bevy's previous material system leaves a lot to be desired:
* Materials require manually implementing the `RenderAsset` trait, which involves manually generating the bind group, handling gpu buffer data transfer, looking up image textures, etc. Even the simplest single-texture material involves writing ~80 unnecessary lines of code. This was never the long term plan.
* There are two material traits, which is confusing, hard to document, and often redundant: `Material` and `SpecializedMaterial`. `Material` implicitly implements `SpecializedMaterial`, and `SpecializedMaterial` is used in most high level apis to support both use cases. Most users shouldn't need to think about specialization at all (I consider it a "power-user tool"), so the fact that `SpecializedMaterial` is front-and-center in our apis is a miss.
* Implementing either material trait involves a lot of "type soup". The "prepared asset" parameter is particularly heinous: `&<Self as RenderAsset>::PreparedAsset`. Defining vertex and fragment shaders is also more verbose than it needs to be. 

## Solution

Say hello to the new `Material` system:

```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)]
#[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"]
pub struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    color_texture: Handle<Image>,
}
impl Material for CoolMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "cool_material.wgsl".into()
    }
}
```

Thats it! This same material would have required [~80 lines of complicated "type heavy" code](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/v0.7.0/examples/shader/shader_material.rs) in the old Material system. Now it is just 14 lines of simple, readable code.

This is thanks to a new consolidated `Material` trait and the new `AsBindGroup` trait / derive.

### The new `Material` trait

The old "split" `Material` and `SpecializedMaterial` traits have been removed in favor of a new consolidated `Material` trait. All of the functions on the trait are optional.

The difficulty of implementing `Material` has been reduced by simplifying dataflow and removing type complexity:

```rust
// Old
impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader(asset_server: &AssetServer) -> Option<Handle<Shader>> {
        Some(asset_server.load("custom_material.wgsl"))
    }

    fn alpha_mode(render_asset: &<Self as RenderAsset>::PreparedAsset) -> AlphaMode {
        render_asset.alpha_mode
    }
}

// New
impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "custom_material.wgsl".into()
    }

    fn alpha_mode(&self) -> AlphaMode {
        self.alpha_mode
    }
}
```

Specialization is still supported, but it is hidden by default under the `specialize()` function (more on this later).

### The `AsBindGroup` trait / derive

The `Material` trait now requires the `AsBindGroup` derive. This can be implemented manually relatively easily, but deriving it will almost always be preferable. 

Field attributes like `uniform` and `texture` are used to define which fields should be bindings,
what their binding type is, and what index they should be bound at:

```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    color_texture: Handle<Image>,
}
```

In WGSL shaders, the binding looks like this:

```wgsl
struct CoolMaterial {
    color: vec4<f32>;
};

[[group(1), binding(0)]]
var<uniform> material: CoolMaterial;
[[group(1), binding(1)]]
var color_texture: texture_2d<f32>;
[[group(1), binding(2)]]
var color_sampler: sampler;
```

Note that the "group" index is determined by the usage context. It is not defined in `AsBindGroup`. Bevy material bind groups are bound to group 1.

The following field-level attributes are supported:
* `uniform(BINDING_INDEX)`
    * The field will be converted to a shader-compatible type using the `ShaderType` trait, written to a `Buffer`, and bound as a uniform. It can also be derived for custom structs.
* `texture(BINDING_INDEX)`
    * This field's `Handle<Image>` will be used to look up the matching `Texture` gpu resource, which will be bound as a texture in shaders. The field will be assumed to implement `Into<Option<Handle<Image>>>`. In practice, most fields should be a `Handle<Image>` or `Option<Handle<Image>>`. If the value of an `Option<Handle<Image>>` is `None`, the new `FallbackImage` resource will be used instead. This attribute can be used in conjunction with a `sampler` binding attribute (with a different binding index).
* `sampler(BINDING_INDEX)`
    * Behaves exactly like the `texture` attribute, but sets the Image's sampler binding instead of the texture. 

Note that fields without field-level binding attributes will be ignored.
```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    this_field_is_ignored: String,
}
```

As mentioned above, `Option<Handle<Image>>` is also supported:
```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
}
```
This is useful if you want a texture to be optional. When the value is `None`, the `FallbackImage` will be used for the binding instead, which defaults to "pure white".

Field uniforms with the same binding index will be combined into a single binding:
```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[uniform(0)]
    roughness: f32,
}
```

In WGSL shaders, the binding would look like this:
```wgsl
struct CoolMaterial {
    color: vec4<f32>;
    roughness: f32;
};

[[group(1), binding(0)]]
var<uniform> material: CoolMaterial;
```

Some less common scenarios will require "struct-level" attributes. These are the currently supported struct-level attributes:
* `uniform(BINDING_INDEX, ConvertedShaderType)`
    * Similar to the field-level `uniform` attribute, but instead the entire `AsBindGroup` value is converted to `ConvertedShaderType`, which must implement `ShaderType`. This is useful if more complicated conversion logic is required.
* `bind_group_data(DataType)`
    * The `AsBindGroup` type will be converted to some `DataType` using `Into<DataType>` and stored as `AsBindGroup::Data` as part of the `AsBindGroup::as_bind_group` call. This is useful if data needs to be stored alongside the generated bind group, such as a unique identifier for a material's bind group. The most common use case for this attribute is "shader pipeline specialization".

The previous `CoolMaterial` example illustrating "combining multiple field-level uniform attributes with the same binding index" can
also be equivalently represented with a single struct-level uniform attribute:
```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup)]
#[uniform(0, CoolMaterialUniform)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    color: Color,
    roughness: f32,
}

#[derive(ShaderType)]
struct CoolMaterialUniform {
    color: Color,
    roughness: f32,
}

impl From<&CoolMaterial> for CoolMaterialUniform {
    fn from(material: &CoolMaterial) -> CoolMaterialUniform {
        CoolMaterialUniform {
            color: material.color,
            roughness: material.roughness,
        }
    }
}
```

### Material Specialization

Material shader specialization is now _much_ simpler:

```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)]
#[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"]
#[bind_group_data(CoolMaterialKey)]
struct CoolMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    is_red: bool,
}

#[derive(Copy, Clone, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)]
struct CoolMaterialKey {
    is_red: bool,
}

impl From<&CoolMaterial> for CoolMaterialKey {
    fn from(material: &CoolMaterial) -> CoolMaterialKey {
        CoolMaterialKey {
            is_red: material.is_red,
        }
    }
}

impl Material for CoolMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "cool_material.wgsl".into()
    }

    fn specialize(
        pipeline: &MaterialPipeline<Self>,
        descriptor: &mut RenderPipelineDescriptor,
        layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout,
        key: MaterialPipelineKey<Self>,
    ) -> Result<(), SpecializedMeshPipelineError> {
        if key.bind_group_data.is_red {
            let fragment = descriptor.fragment.as_mut().unwrap();
            fragment.shader_defs.push("IS_RED".to_string());
        }
        Ok(())
    }
}
```

Setting `bind_group_data` is not required for specialization (it defaults to `()`). Scenarios like "custom vertex attributes" also benefit from this system:
```rust
impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn vertex_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "custom_material.wgsl".into()
    }

    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "custom_material.wgsl".into()
    }

    fn specialize(
        pipeline: &MaterialPipeline<Self>,
        descriptor: &mut RenderPipelineDescriptor,
        layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout,
        key: MaterialPipelineKey<Self>,
    ) -> Result<(), SpecializedMeshPipelineError> {
        let vertex_layout = layout.get_layout(&[
            Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0),
            ATTRIBUTE_BLEND_COLOR.at_shader_location(1),
        ])?;
        descriptor.vertex.buffers = vec![vertex_layout];
        Ok(())
    }
}
```

### Ported `StandardMaterial` to the new `Material` system

Bevy's built-in PBR material uses the new Material system (including the AsBindGroup derive):

```rust
#[derive(AsBindGroup, Debug, Clone, TypeUuid)]
#[uuid = "7494888b-c082-457b-aacf-517228cc0c22"]
#[bind_group_data(StandardMaterialKey)]
#[uniform(0, StandardMaterialUniform)]
pub struct StandardMaterial {
    pub base_color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    pub base_color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
    /* other fields omitted for brevity */
```

### Ported Bevy examples to the new `Material` system

The overall complexity of Bevy's "custom shader examples" has gone down significantly. Take a look at the diffs if you want a dopamine spike.

Please note that while this PR has a net increase in "lines of code", most of those extra lines come from added documentation. There is a significant reduction
in the overall complexity of the code (even accounting for the new derive logic).

---

## Changelog

### Added

* `AsBindGroup` trait and derive, which make it much easier to transfer data to the gpu and generate bind groups for a given type.

### Changed

* The old `Material` and `SpecializedMaterial` traits have been replaced by a consolidated (much simpler) `Material` trait. Materials no longer implement `RenderAsset`.
* `StandardMaterial` was ported to the new material system. There are no user-facing api changes to the `StandardMaterial` struct api, but it now implements `AsBindGroup` and `Material` instead of `RenderAsset` and `SpecializedMaterial`.

## Migration Guide
The Material system has been reworked to be much simpler. We've removed a lot of boilerplate with the new `AsBindGroup` derive and the `Material` trait is simpler as well!

### Bevy 0.7 (old)

```rust
#[derive(Debug, Clone, TypeUuid)]
#[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"]
pub struct CustomMaterial {
    color: Color,
    color_texture: Handle<Image>,
}

#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct GpuCustomMaterial {
    _buffer: Buffer,
    bind_group: BindGroup,
}

impl RenderAsset for CustomMaterial {
    type ExtractedAsset = CustomMaterial;
    type PreparedAsset = GpuCustomMaterial;
    type Param = (SRes<RenderDevice>, SRes<MaterialPipeline<Self>>);
    fn extract_asset(&self) -> Self::ExtractedAsset {
        self.clone()
    }

    fn prepare_asset(
        extracted_asset: Self::ExtractedAsset,
        (render_device, material_pipeline): &mut SystemParamItem<Self::Param>,
    ) -> Result<Self::PreparedAsset, PrepareAssetError<Self::ExtractedAsset>> {
        let color = Vec4::from_slice(&extracted_asset.color.as_linear_rgba_f32());

        let byte_buffer = [0u8; Vec4::SIZE.get() as usize];
        let mut buffer = encase::UniformBuffer::new(byte_buffer);
        buffer.write(&color).unwrap();

        let buffer = render_device.create_buffer_with_data(&BufferInitDescriptor {
            contents: buffer.as_ref(),
            label: None,
            usage: BufferUsages::UNIFORM | BufferUsages::COPY_DST,
        });

        let (texture_view, texture_sampler) = if let Some(result) = material_pipeline
            .mesh_pipeline
            .get_image_texture(gpu_images, &Some(extracted_asset.color_texture.clone()))
        {
            result
        } else {
            return Err(PrepareAssetError::RetryNextUpdate(extracted_asset));
        };
        let bind_group = render_device.create_bind_group(&BindGroupDescriptor {
            entries: &[
                BindGroupEntry {
                    binding: 0,
                    resource: buffer.as_entire_binding(),
                },
                BindGroupEntry {
                    binding: 0,
                    resource: BindingResource::TextureView(texture_view),
                },
                BindGroupEntry {
                    binding: 1,
                    resource: BindingResource::Sampler(texture_sampler),
                },
            ],
            label: None,
            layout: &material_pipeline.material_layout,
        });

        Ok(GpuCustomMaterial {
            _buffer: buffer,
            bind_group,
        })
    }
}

impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader(asset_server: &AssetServer) -> Option<Handle<Shader>> {
        Some(asset_server.load("custom_material.wgsl"))
    }

    fn bind_group(render_asset: &<Self as RenderAsset>::PreparedAsset) -> &BindGroup {
        &render_asset.bind_group
    }

    fn bind_group_layout(render_device: &RenderDevice) -> BindGroupLayout {
        render_device.create_bind_group_layout(&BindGroupLayoutDescriptor {
            entries: &[
                BindGroupLayoutEntry {
                    binding: 0,
                    visibility: ShaderStages::FRAGMENT,
                    ty: BindingType::Buffer {
                        ty: BufferBindingType::Uniform,
                        has_dynamic_offset: false,
                        min_binding_size: Some(Vec4::min_size()),
                    },
                    count: None,
                },
                BindGroupLayoutEntry {
                    binding: 1,
                    visibility: ShaderStages::FRAGMENT,
                    ty: BindingType::Texture {
                        multisampled: false,
                        sample_type: TextureSampleType::Float { filterable: true },
                        view_dimension: TextureViewDimension::D2Array,
                    },
                    count: None,
                },
                BindGroupLayoutEntry {
                    binding: 2,
                    visibility: ShaderStages::FRAGMENT,
                    ty: BindingType::Sampler(SamplerBindingType::Filtering),
                    count: None,
                },
            ],
            label: None,
        })
    }
}
```

### Bevy 0.8 (new)

```rust
impl Material for CustomMaterial {
    fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
        "custom_material.wgsl".into()
    }
}

#[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)]
#[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"]
pub struct CustomMaterial {
    #[uniform(0)]
    color: Color,
    #[texture(1)]
    #[sampler(2)]
    color_texture: Handle<Image>,
}
```

## Future Work

* Add support for more binding types (cubemaps, buffers, etc). This PR intentionally includes a bare minimum number of binding types to keep "reviewability" in check.
* Consider optionally eliding binding indices using binding names. `AsBindGroup` could pass in (optional?) reflection info as a "hint".
    * This would make it possible for the derive to do this:
        ```rust
        #[derive(AsBindGroup)]
        pub struct CustomMaterial {
            #[uniform]
            color: Color,
            #[texture]
            #[sampler]
            color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
            alpha_mode: AlphaMode,
        }
        ```
    * Or this
        ```rust
        #[derive(AsBindGroup)]
        pub struct CustomMaterial {
            #[binding]
            color: Color,
            #[binding]
            color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
            alpha_mode: AlphaMode,
        }
        ```
    * Or even this (if we flip to "include bindings by default")
        ```rust
        #[derive(AsBindGroup)]
        pub struct CustomMaterial {
            color: Color,
            color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>,
            #[binding(ignore)]
            alpha_mode: AlphaMode,
        }
        ```
* If we add the option to define custom draw functions for materials (which could be done in a type-erased way), I think that would be enough to support extra non-material bindings. Worth considering!
2022-06-30 23:48:46 +00:00
robtfm
575ea81d7b add Visibility for lights (#3958)
# Objective

Add Visibility for lights

## Solution

- add Visibility to PointLightBundle and DirectionLightBundle
- filter lights used by Visibility.is_visible

note: includes changes from #3916 due to overlap, will be cleaner after that is merged
2022-03-05 03:23:01 +00:00
Robert Swain
85b7589388 bevy_gltf: Add support for loading lights (#3506)
# Objective

- Add support for loading lights from glTF 2.0 files

## Solution

- This adds support for the KHR_punctual_lights extension which supports point, directional, and spot lights, though we don't yet support spot lights.
- Inserting light bundles when creating scenes required registering some more light bundle component types.
2022-01-03 07:59:25 +00:00
Carter Anderson
963e2f08a2 Materials and MaterialPlugin (#3428)
This adds "high level" `Material` and `SpecializedMaterial` traits, which can be used with a `MaterialPlugin<T: SpecializedMaterial>`. `MaterialPlugin` automatically registers the appropriate resources, draw functions, and queue systems. The `Material` trait is simpler, and should cover most use cases. `SpecializedMaterial` is like `Material`, but it also requires defining a "specialization key" (see #3031). `Material` has a trivial blanket impl of `SpecializedMaterial`, which allows us to use the same types + functions for both.

This makes defining custom 3d materials much simpler (see the `shader_material` example diff) and ensures consistent behavior across all 3d materials (both built in and custom). I ported the built in `StandardMaterial` to `MaterialPlugin`. There is also a new `MaterialMeshBundle<T: SpecializedMaterial>`, which `PbrBundle` aliases to.
2021-12-25 21:45:43 +00:00
François
c825fda74a add default standard material in PbrBundle (#3325)
# Objective

- Fix #3323 


## Solution

- Add a default standard material that is very visible. It is similar to the previous standard material that was used

<img width="1392" alt="Screenshot 2021-12-14 at 15 39 01" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8672791/146019401-ed4b5fc1-7cce-4a8f-a511-a6f9665a51d7.png">



Co-authored-by: François <8672791+mockersf@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-14 23:04:26 +00:00
Carter Anderson
ffecb05a0a Replace old renderer with new renderer (#3312)
This makes the [New Bevy Renderer](#2535) the default (and only) renderer. The new renderer isn't _quite_ ready for the final release yet, but I want as many people as possible to start testing it so we can identify bugs and address feedback prior to release.

The examples are all ported over and operational with a few exceptions:

* I removed a good portion of the examples in the `shader` folder. We still have some work to do in order to make these examples possible / ergonomic / worthwhile: #3120 and "high level shader material plugins" are the big ones. This is a temporary measure.
* Temporarily removed the multiple_windows example: doing this properly in the new renderer will require the upcoming "render targets" changes. Same goes for the render_to_texture example.
* Removed z_sort_debug: entity visibility sort info is no longer available in app logic. we could do this on the "render app" side, but i dont consider it a priority.
2021-12-14 03:58:23 +00:00