Commit Graph

1798 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alice Cecile
ab0e3f8714
Small cleanup for ECS error handling (#18280)
# Objective

While poking at https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17272, I
noticed a few small things to clean up.

## Solution

- Improve the docs
- ~~move `SystemErrorContext` out of the `handler.rs` module: it's not
an error handler~~
2025-03-13 00:13:02 +00:00
NiseVoid
5d80ac3ded
Add derive Default to Disabled (#18275)
# Objective

- `#[require(Disabled)]` doesn't work as you'd expect

## Solution

- `#[derive(Default)]`
2025-03-12 17:57:20 +00:00
newclarityex
ecccd57417
Generic system config (#17962)
# Objective
Prevents duplicate implementation between IntoSystemConfigs and
IntoSystemSetConfigs using a generic, adds a NodeType trait for more
config flexibility (opening the door to implement
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14195?).

## Solution
Followed writeup by @ItsDoot:
https://hackmd.io/@doot/rJeefFHc1x

Removes IntoSystemConfigs and IntoSystemSetConfigs, instead using
IntoNodeConfigs with generics.

## Testing
Pending

---

## Showcase
N/A

## Migration Guide
SystemSetConfigs -> NodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet>
SystemConfigs -> NodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem>
IntoSystemSetConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet, M>
IntoSystemConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem, M>

---------

Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-03-12 00:12:30 +00:00
krunchington
f1331069e7
Implement SpawnableList for Vec<Bundle> (#18259)
# Objective

In updating examples to use the Improved Spawning API I got tripped up
on being able to spawn children with a Vec. I eventually figured out
that I could use `Children::spawn(SpawnIter(my_vec.into_iter()))` but
thought there might be a more ergonomic way to approach it. After
tinkering with it for a while I came up with the implementation here. It
allows authors to use `Children::spawn(my_vec)` as an equivalent
implementation.

## Solution

- Implements `<R: Relationship, B: Bundle SpawnableList<R> for Vec<B>`
- uses `alloc::vec::Vec` for compatibility with `no_std` (`std::Vec`
also inherits implementations against the `alloc::vec::Vec` because std
is a re-export of the alloc struct, thanks @bushrat011899 for the info
on this!)

## Testing

- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- Opened the examples before and after and verified the same behavior
was observed. I did this on Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS using `--features
wayland`.
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- Other OS's and features can't hurt, but this is such a small change it
shouldn't be a problem.
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
  - Run the examples yourself with and without these changes.
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
  - see above

## Showcase

n/a

## Migration Guide

- Optional: you may use the new API to spawn `Vec`s of `Bundle` instead
of using the `SpawnIter` approach.
2025-03-11 20:32:37 +00:00
Cyrill Schenkel
8570af1d96
Add print_stdout and print_stderr lints (#17446) (#18233)
# Objective

- Prevent usage of `println!`, `eprintln!` and the like because they
require `std`
- Fixes #17446

## Solution

- Enable the `print_stdout` and `print_stderr` clippy lints
- Replace all `println!` and `eprintln!` occurrences with `log::*` where
applicable or alternatively ignore the warnings

## Testing

- Run `cargo clippy --workspace` to ensure that there are no warnings
relating to printing to `stdout` or `stderr`
2025-03-11 19:35:48 +00:00
Vic
32d53e7bd3
make various entity wrapper type modules public (#18248)
# Objective

Part of the #16547 series.

The entity wrapper types often have some associated types an aliases
with them that cannot be re-exported into an outer module together.
Some helper types are best used with part of their path:
`bevy::ecs::entity::index_set::Slice` as `index_set::Slice`.
This has already been done for `entity::hash_set` and
`entity::hash_map`.

## Solution

Publicize the `index_set`, `index_map`, `unique_vec`, `unique_slice`,
and `unique_array` modules.

## Migration Guide

Any mention or import of types in the affected modules have to add the
respective module name to the import path.
F.e.:
`bevy::ecs::entity::EntityIndexSet` ->
`bevy::ecs::entity::index_set::EntityIndexSet`
2025-03-11 05:48:31 +00:00
Brezak
906d788420
Expand the RelationshipSourceCollection to return more information (#18241)
# Objective

While redoing #18058 I needed `RelationshipSourceCollection` (henceforth
referred to as the **Trait**) to implement `clear` so I added it.

## Solution

Add the `clear` method to the **Trait**.
Also make `add` and `remove` report if they succeeded.

## Testing

Eyeballs

---

## Showcase

The `RelationshipSourceCollection` trait now reports if adding or
removing an entity from it was successful.
It also not contains the `clear` method so you can easily clear the
collection in generic contexts.

## Changes

EDITED by Alice: We should get this into 0.16, so no migration guide
needed.

The `RelationshipSourceCollection` methods `add` and `remove` now need
to return a boolean indicating if they were successful (adding a entity
to a set that already contains it counts as failure). Additionally the
`clear` method has been added to support clearing the collection in
generic contexts.
2025-03-10 22:04:08 +00:00
Eagster
65a9e6fd9f
Address Entities::len inconsistency (#18190)
# Objective

I was recently exploreing `Entities` and stumbled on something strange.
`Entities::len` (the field) has the comment `Stores the number of free
entities for [`len`](Entities::len)`, refering to the method. But that
method says `The count of currently allocated entities.` Looking at the
code, the field's comment is wrong, and the public `len()` is correct.
Phew!

## Solution

So, I was just going to fix the comment, so it didn't confuse anyone
else, but as it turns out, we can just remove the field entirely. As a
bonus, this saves some book keeping work too. We can just calculate it
on the fly.

Also, add additional length methods and documentation for completeness.
These new length methods might be useful debug tools in the future.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-03-10 21:51:01 +00:00
Eagster
21f003f13f
Improve component registration performance (#18180)
# Objective

Make component registration faster. This is a tinny, almost petty PR,
but it led to roughly 10% faster registration, according to my
benchmarks in #17871.

Up to y'all if we do this or not. It is completely unnecessary, but its
such low hanging fruit that I wanted to put it out there.

## Solution

Instead of cloning a `HashSet`, collect it into a `SmallVec`. Since this
is empty for many components, this saves a lot of allocation and hashing
work.

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-03-10 21:49:07 +00:00
Eagster
246ce590e5
Queued component registration (#18173)
# Objective

This is an alternative to #17871 and #17701 for tracking issue #18155.
This thanks to @maniwani for help with this design.

The goal is to enable component ids to be reserved from multiple threads
concurrently and with only `&World`. This contributes to assets as
entities, read-only query and system parameter initialization, etc.

## What's wrong with #17871 ?

In #17871, I used my proposed staging utilities to allow *fully*
registering components from any thread concurrently with only
`&Components`. However, if we want to pursue components as entities
(which is desirable for a great many reasons. See
[here](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1346499196655505534)
on discord), this staging isn't going to work. After all, if registering
a component requires spawning an entity, and spawning an entity requires
`&mut World`, it is impossible to register a component fully with only
`&World`.

## Solution

But what if we don't have to register it all the way? What if it's
enough to just know the `ComponentId` it will have once it is registered
and to queue it to be registered at a later time? Spoiler alert: That is
all we need for these features.

Here's the basic design:

Queue a registration:

1. Check if it has already been registered.
2. Check if it has already been queued.
3. Reserve a `ComponentId`.
4. Queue the registration at that id.

Direct (normal) registration:

1. Check if this registration has been queued.
2. If it has, use the queued registration instead.
3. Otherwise, proceed like normal.

Appllying the queue:

1. Pop queued items off one by one.
2. Register them directly.

One other change:

The whole point of this design over #17871 is to facilitate coupling
component registration with the World. To ensure that this would fully
work with that, I went ahead and moved the `ComponentId` generator onto
the world itself. That stemmed a couple of minor organizational changes
(see migration guide). As we do components as entities, we will replace
this generator with `Entities`, which lives on `World` too. Doing this
move early let me verify the design and will reduce migration headaches
in the future. If components as entities is as close as I think it is, I
don't think splitting this up into different PRs is worth it. If it is
not as close as it is, it might make sense to still do #17871 in the
meantime (see the risks section). I'll leave it up to y'all what we end
up doing though.

## Risks and Testing

The biggest downside of this compared to #17871 is that now we have to
deal with correct but invalid `ComponentId`s. They are invalid because
the component still isn't registered, but they are correct because, once
registered, the component will have exactly that id.

However, the only time this becomes a problem is if some code violates
safety rules by queuing a registration and using the returned id as if
it was valid. As this is a new feature though, nothing in Bevy does
this, so no new tests were added for it. When we do use it, I left
detailed docs to help mitigate issues here, and we can test those
usages. Ex: we will want some tests on using queries initialized from
queued registrations.

## Migration Guide

Component registration can now be queued with only `&World`. To
facilitate this, a few APIs needed to be moved around.

The following functions have moved from `Components` to
`ComponentsRegistrator`:

- `register_component`
- `register_component_with_descriptor`
- `register_resource_with_descriptor`
- `register_non_send`
- `register_resource`
- `register_required_components_manual`

Accordingly, functions in `Bundle` and `Component` now take
`ComponentsRegistrator` instead of `Components`.
You can obtain `ComponentsRegistrator` from the new
`World::components_registrator`.
You can obtain `ComponentsQueuedRegistrator` from the new
`World::components_queue`, and use it to stage component registration if
desired.

# Open Question

Can we verify that it is enough to queue registration with `&World`? I
don't think it would be too difficult to package this up into a
`Arc<MyComponentsManager>` type thing if we need to, but keeping this on
`&World` certainly simplifies things. If we do need the `Arc`, we'll
need to look into partitioning `Entities` for components as entities, so
we can keep most of the allocation fast on `World` and only keep a
smaller partition in the `Arc`. I'd love an SME on assets as entities to
shed some light on this.

---------

Co-authored-by: andriyDev <andriydzikh@gmail.com>
2025-03-10 21:46:27 +00:00
SpecificProtagonist
54247bcf86
Recursive run_system (#18076)
# Objective

Fixes #18030

## Solution

When running a one-shot system, requeue the system's command queue onto
the world's command queue, then execute the later.

If running the entire command queue of the world is undesired, I could
add a new method to `RawCommandQueue` to only apply part of it.

## Testing

See the new test.

---

## Showcase

```rust
#[derive(Resource)]
pub struct Test {
    id: SystemId,
    counter: u32,
}

let mut world = World::new();
let id = world.register_system(|mut commands: Commands, mut test: ResMut<Test>| {
    print!("{:?} ", test.counter);
    test.counter -= 1;
    if test.counter > 0 {
        commands.run_system(test.id);
    }
});
world.insert_resource(Test { id, counter: 5 });
world.run_system(id).unwrap();
```

```
5 4 3 2 1 
```
2025-03-10 21:38:36 +00:00
Eagster
79e7f8ae0c
Use register_dynamic for merging (#18028)
# Objective

I found a bug while working on #17871. When required components are
registered, ones that are more specific (smaller inheritance depth) are
preferred to others. So, if a ComponentA is already required, but it is
registered as required again, it will be updated if and only if the new
requirement has a smaller inheritance depth (is more specific). However,
this logic was not reflected in merging `RequriedComponents`s together.
Hence, for complicated requirement trees, the wrong initializer could be
used.

## Solution

Re-write merging to work by extending the collection via
`require_dynamic` instead of blindly combining the inner storage.

## Testing

I created this test to ensure this bug doesn't creep back in. This test
fails on main, but passes on this branch.

```rs
    #[test]
    fn required_components_inheritance_depth_bias() {
        #[derive(Component, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Copy, Debug)]
        struct MyRequired(bool);

        #[derive(Component, Default)]
        #[require(MyRequired(|| MyRequired(false)))]
        struct MiddleMan;

        #[derive(Component, Default)]
        #[require(MiddleMan)]
        struct ConflictingRequire;

        #[derive(Component, Default)]
        #[require(MyRequired(|| MyRequired(true)))]
        struct MyComponent;

        let mut world = World::new();
        let order_a = world
            .spawn((ConflictingRequire, MyComponent))
            .get::<MyRequired>()
            .cloned();
        let order_b = world
            .spawn((MyComponent, ConflictingRequire))
            .get::<MyRequired>()
            .cloned();

        assert_eq!(order_a, Some(MyRequired(true)));
        assert_eq!(order_b, Some(MyRequired(true)));
    }
```
Note that when the inheritance depth is 0 (Like if there were no middle
man above), the order of the components in the bundle still matters.

## Migration Guide

`RequiredComponents::register_dynamic` has been changed to
`RequiredComponents::register_dynamic_with`.

Old:
```rust
required_components.register_dynamic(
      component_id,
      component_constructor.clone(),
      requirement_inheritance_depth,
);
```

New:
```rust
required_components.register_dynamic_with(
      component_id,
      requirement_inheritance_depth,
      || component_constructor.clone(),
);
```

This can prevent unnecessary cloning.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Joona Aalto <jondolf.dev@gmail.com>
2025-03-10 21:35:55 +00:00
Chris Russell
6df711ce7f
Fix unsound lifetimes in Query::join and Query::join_filtered (#17972)
# Objective

Fix unsound lifetimes in `Query::join` and `Query::join_filtered`.  

The joined query allowed access from either input query, but it only
took the `'world` lifetime from `self`, not from `other`. This meant
that after the borrow of `other` ended, the joined query would unsoundly
alias `other`.

## Solution

Change the lifetimes on `join` and `join_filtered` to require mutable
borrows of the *same* lifetime for the input queries. This ensures both
input queries are borrowed for the full lifetime of the joined query.

Change `join_inner` to take `other` by value instead of reference so
that the returned query is still usable without needing to borrow from a
local variable.

## Testing

Added a compile-fail test.
2025-03-10 21:30:34 +00:00
SpecificProtagonist
cdef139710
Backtrace: std and threadsafe bevy_error_panic_hook (#18235)
# Objective

Make `bevy_error_panic_hook` threadsafe. As it relies on a global
variable, it fails when multiple threads panic.

## Solution

Switch from a global variable for storing whether an error message was
printed to a thread-local one.

`thread_local` is in `std`; the `backtrace` already relies on `std`
APIs. It didn't depend on the `std` feature though, so I've added that.
I've also put `bevy_error_panic_hook` behind the `backtrace` feature,
since it relies on the thread local variable, which fixes #18231.

## Testing

The following now loops instead of crashing:

```rust
std:🧵:scope(|s| {
    use bevy_ecs::error::*;

    #[derive(Debug)]
    struct E;
    impl std::fmt::Display for E {
        fn fmt(&self, _: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
            todo!()
        }
    }
    impl std::error::Error for E {}

    std::panic::set_hook(Box::new(bevy_error_panic_hook(|_| {
        unreachable!();
    })));
    for _ in 0..2 {
        s.spawn(|| {
            loop {
                let _ = std::panic::catch_unwind(|| {
                    panic!("{:?}", BevyError::from(E));
                });
            }
        });
    }
});
```
2025-03-10 21:16:14 +00:00
Zachary Harrold
cbc931723e
Remove lifetime from QueryEntityError (#18157)
# Objective

- Allow `Query` methods such as `Query::get` to have their error
short-circuited using `?` in systems using Bevy's `Error` type

## Solution

- Removed `UnsafeWorldCell<'w>` from `QueryEntityError` and instead
store `ArchetypeId` (the information the error formatter was extracting
anyway).
- Replaced trait implementations with derives now that the type is
plain-old-data.

## Testing

- CI

---

## Migration Guide

- `QueryEntityError::QueryDoesNotMatch.1` is of type `ArchetypeId`
instead of `UnsafeWorldCell`. It is up to the caller to obtain an
`UnsafeWorldCell` now.
- `QueryEntityError` no longer has a lifetime parameter, remove it from
type signatures where required.

## Notes

This was discussed on Discord and accepted by Cart as the desirable path
forward in [this
message](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1346611950527713310).
Scroll up from this point for context.

---------

Co-authored-by: SpecificProtagonist <30270112+SpecificProtagonist@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-03-09 20:05:22 +00:00
krunchington
ab38b61001
Update Component docs to point to Relationship trait (#18179)
also updates Relationship docs terminology

# Objective

- Contributes to #18111 

## Solution

Updates Component docs with a new section linking to Relationship. Also
updates some Relationship terminology as I understand it.

## Testing

- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
  - opened Docs, verified link
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
  - I don't think so
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- run `cargo doc --open` and check out Component and Relationship docs,
verify their correctness
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
  - I think this is n/a but I ran the doc command on Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS

---

## Showcase


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/241eecb2-dd98-43ab-875a-1a3ec1176a79)


## Migration Guide

n/a
2025-03-07 23:32:43 +00:00
Zachary Harrold
cc69fdd0c6
Add no_std support to bevy (#17955)
# Objective

- Fixes #15460 (will open new issues for further `no_std` efforts)
- Supersedes #17715

## Solution

- Threaded in new features as required
- Made certain crates optional but default enabled
- Removed `compile-check-no-std` from internal `ci` tool since GitHub CI
can now simply check `bevy` itself now
- Added CI task to check `bevy` on `thumbv6m-none-eabi` to ensure
`portable-atomic` support is still valid [^1]

[^1]: This may be controversial, since it could be interpreted as
implying Bevy will maintain support for `thumbv6m-none-eabi` going
forward. In reality, just like `x86_64-unknown-none`, this is a
[canary](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/canary_in_a_coal_mine) target to
make it clear when `portable-atomic` no longer works as intended (fixing
atomic support on atomically challenged platforms). If a PR comes
through and makes supporting this class of platforms impossible, then
this CI task can be removed. I however wager this won't be a problem.

## Testing

- CI

---

## Release Notes

Bevy now has support for `no_std` directly from the `bevy` crate.

Users can disable default features and enable a new `default_no_std`
feature instead, allowing `bevy` to be used in `no_std` applications and
libraries.

```toml
# Bevy for `no_std` platforms
bevy = { version = "0.16", default-features = false, features = ["default_no_std"] }
```

`default_no_std` enables certain required features, such as `libm` and
`critical-section`, and as many optional crates as possible (currently
just `bevy_state`). For atomically-challenged platforms such as the
Raspberry Pi Pico, `portable-atomic` will be used automatically.

For library authors, we recommend depending on `bevy` with
`default-features = false` to allow `std` and `no_std` users to both
depend on your crate. Here are some recommended features a library crate
may want to expose:

```toml
[features]
# Most users will be on a platform which has `std` and can use the more-powerful `async_executor`.
default = ["std", "async_executor"]

# Features for typical platforms.
std = ["bevy/std"]
async_executor = ["bevy/async_executor"]

# Features for `no_std` platforms.
libm = ["bevy/libm"]
critical-section = ["bevy/critical-section"]

[dependencies]
# We disable default features to ensure we don't accidentally enable `std` on `no_std` targets, for example. 
bevy = { version = "0.16", default-features = false }
```

While this is verbose, it gives the maximum control to end-users to
decide how they wish to use Bevy on their platform.

We encourage library authors to experiment with `no_std` support. For
libraries relying exclusively on `bevy` and no other dependencies, it
may be as simple as adding `#![no_std]` to your `lib.rs` and exposing
features as above! Bevy can also provide many `std` types, such as
`HashMap`, `Mutex`, and `Instant` on all platforms. See
`bevy::platform_support` for details on what's available out of the box!

## Migration Guide

- If you were previously relying on `bevy` with default features
disabled, you may need to enable the `std` and `async_executor`
features.
- `bevy_reflect` has had its `bevy` feature removed. If you were relying
on this feature, simply enable `smallvec` and `smol_str` instead.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-03-07 03:39:46 +00:00
Alice Cecile
5bc1d68a65
Deprecated Query::many and many_mut (#18183)
# Objective

Alternative to and closes #18120.

Sibling to #18082, see that PR for broader reasoning.

Folks weren't sold on the name `many` (get_many is clearer, and this is
rare), and that PR is much more complex.

## Solution

- Simply deprecate `Query::many` and `Query::many_mut`
- Clean up internal usages

Mentions of this in the docs can wait until it's fully removed in the
0.17 cycle IMO: it's much easier to catch the problems when doing that.

## Testing

CI!

## Migration Guide

`Query::many` and `Query::many_mut` have been deprecated to reduce
panics and API duplication. Use `Query::get_many` and
`Query::get_many_mut` instead, and handle the `Result`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-03-07 02:10:32 +00:00
Tim Overbeek
664000f848
Improve derive(Event) and simplify macro code (#18083)
# Objective

simplify some code and improve Event macro

Closes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14336,


# Showcase

you can now write derive Events like so
```rust
#[derive(event)]
#[event(auto_propagate, traversal = MyType)]
struct MyEvent;
```
2025-03-07 02:01:23 +00:00
Carter Anderson
cca5813472
BevyError: Bevy's new catch-all error type (#18144)
## Objective

Fixes #18092

Bevy's current error type is a simple type alias for `Box<dyn Error +
Send + Sync + 'static>`. This largely works as a catch-all error, but it
is missing a critical feature: the ability to capture a backtrace at the
point that the error occurs. The best way to do this is `anyhow`-style
error handling: a new error type that takes advantage of the fact that
the `?` `From` conversion happens "inline" to capture the backtrace at
the point of the error.

## Solution

This PR adds a new `BevyError` type (replacing our old
`std::error::Error` type alias), which uses the "from conversion
backtrace capture" approach:

```rust
fn oh_no() -> Result<(), BevyError> {
    // this fails with Rust's built in ParseIntError, which
    // is converted into the catch-all BevyError type
    let number: usize = "hi".parse()?;
    println!("parsed {number}");
    Ok(())
}
```

This also updates our exported `Result` type alias to default to
`BevyError`, meaning you can write this instead:

```rust
fn oh_no() -> Result {
    let number: usize = "hi".parse()?;
    println!("parsed {number}");
    Ok(())
}
```

When a BevyError is encountered in a system, it will use Bevy's default
system error handler (which panics by default). BevyError does custom
"backtrace filtering" by default, meaning we can cut out the _massive_
amount of "rust internals", "async executor internals", and "bevy system
scheduler internals" that show up in backtraces. It also trims out the
first generally-unnecssary `From` conversion backtrace lines that make
it harder to locate the real error location. The result is a blissfully
simple backtrace by default:


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a5f5c9b-ea70-4176-af3b-d231da31c967)

The full backtrace can be shown by setting the `BEVY_BACKTRACE=full`
environment variable. Non-BevyError panics still use the default Rust
backtrace behavior.

One issue that prevented the truly noise-free backtrace during panics
that you see above is that Rust's default panic handler will print the
unfiltered (and largely unhelpful real-panic-point) backtrace by
default, in _addition_ to our filtered BevyError backtrace (with the
helpful backtrace origin) that we capture and print. To resolve this, I
have extended Bevy's existing PanicHandlerPlugin to wrap the default
panic handler. If we panic from the result of a BevyError, we will skip
the default "print full backtrace" panic handler. This behavior can be
enabled and disabled using the new `error_panic_hook` cargo feature in
`bevy_app` (which is enabled by default).

One downside to _not_ using `Box<dyn Error>` directly is that we can no
longer take advantage of the built-in `Into` impl for strings to errors.
To resolve this, I have added the following:

```rust
// Before
Err("some error")?

// After
Err(BevyError::message("some error"))?
```

We can discuss adding shorthand methods or macros for this (similar to
anyhow's `anyhow!("some error")` macro), but I'd prefer to discuss that
later.

I have also added the following extension method:

```rust
// Before
some_option.ok_or("some error")?;

// After
some_option.ok_or_message("some error")?;
```

I've also moved all of our existing error infrastructure from
`bevy_ecs::result` to `bevy_ecs::error`, as I think that is the better
home for it

## Why not anyhow (or eyre)?

The biggest reason is that `anyhow` needs to be a "generically useful
error type", whereas Bevy is a much narrower scope. By using our own
error, we can be significantly more opinionated. For example, anyhow
doesn't do the extensive (and invasive) backtrace filtering that
BevyError does because it can't operate on Bevy-specific context, and
needs to be generically useful.

Bevy also has a lot of operational context (ex: system info) that could
be useful to attach to errors. If we have control over the error type,
we can add whatever context we want to in a structured way. This could
be increasingly useful as we add more visual / interactive error
handling tools and editor integrations.

Additionally, the core approach used is simple and requires almost no
code. anyhow clocks in at ~2500 lines of code, but the impl here uses
160. We are able to boil this down to exactly what we need, and by doing
so we improve our compile times and the understandability of our code.
2025-03-07 01:50:07 +00:00
Eagster
ed7b366b24
Deprecate insert_or_spawn function family (#18147)
# Objective

Based on #18054, this PR builds on #18035 to deprecate:

- `Commands::insert_or_spawn_batch`
- `Entities::alloc_at_without_replacement`
- `Entities::alloc_at`
- `World::insert_or_spawn_batch`
- `World::insert_or_spawn_batch_with_caller`

## Testing

Just deprecation, so no new tests. Note that as of writing #18035 is
still under testing and review.

## Open Questions

- [x] Should `entity::AllocAtWithoutReplacement` be deprecated? It is
internal and only used in `Entities::alloc_at_without_replacement`.
**EDIT:** Now deprecated.

## Migration Guide

The following functions have been deprecated:

- `Commands::insert_or_spawn_batch`
- `World::insert_or_spawn_batch`
- `World::insert_or_spawn_batch_with_caller`

These functions, when used incorrectly, can cause major performance
problems and are generally viewed as anti-patterns and foot guns. These
are planned to be removed altogether in 0.17.

Instead of these functions consider doing one of the following:

Option A) Instead of despawing entities and re-spawning them at a
particular id, insert the new `Disabled` component without despawning
the entity, and use `try_insert_batch` or `insert_batch` and remove
`Disabled` instead of re-spawning it.

Option B) Instead of giving special meaning to an entity id, simply use
`spawn_batch` and ensure entity references are valid when despawning.

---------

Co-authored-by: JaySpruce <jsprucebruce@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-03-06 17:04:16 +00:00
RobWalt
a85a3a2a15
allow Call and Closure expressions in hook macro attributes (#18017)
# Objective

This PR adds:

- function call hook attributes `#[component(on_add = func(42))]`
  - main feature of this commit
- closure hook attributes `#[component(on_add = |w, ctx| { /* ... */
})]`
  - maybe too verbose
  - but was easy to add
  - was suggested on discord

This allows to reuse common functionality without replicating a lot of
boilerplate. A small example is a hook which just adds different default
sprites. The sprite loading code would be the same for every component.
Unfortunately we can't use the required components feature, since we
need at least an `AssetServer` or other `Resource`s or `Component`s to
load the sprite.

```rs
fn load_sprite(path: &str) -> impl Fn(DeferredWorld, HookContext) {
  |mut world, ctx| {
    // ... use world to load sprite
  }
}

#[derive(Component)]
#[component(on_add = load_sprite("knight.png"))]
struct Knight;

#[derive(Component)]
#[component(on_add = load_sprite("monster.png"))]
struct Monster;
```

---

The commit also reorders the logic of the derive macro a bit. It's
probably a bit less lazy now, but the functionality shouldn't be
performance critical and is executed at compile time anyways.

## Solution

- Introduce `HookKind` enum in the component proc macro module
- extend parsing to allow more cases of expressions

## Testing

I have some code laying around. I'm not sure where to put it yet though.
Also is there a way to check compilation failures? Anyways, here it is:

```rs
use bevy::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
#[component(
    on_add = fooing_and_baring,
    on_insert = fooing_and_baring,
    on_replace = fooing_and_baring,
    on_despawn = fooing_and_baring,
    on_remove = fooing_and_baring
)]
pub struct FooPath;

fn fooing_and_baring(
    world: bevy::ecs::world::DeferredWorld,
    ctx: bevy::ecs::component::HookContext,
) {
}

#[derive(Component)]
#[component(
    on_add = baring_and_bazzing("foo"),
    on_insert = baring_and_bazzing("foo"),
    on_replace = baring_and_bazzing("foo"),
    on_despawn = baring_and_bazzing("foo"),
    on_remove = baring_and_bazzing("foo")
)]
pub struct FooCall;

fn baring_and_bazzing(
    path: &str,
) -> impl Fn(bevy::ecs::world::DeferredWorld, bevy::ecs::component::HookContext) {
    |world, ctx| {}
}

#[derive(Component)]
#[component(
    on_add = |w,ctx| {},
    on_insert = |w,ctx| {},
    on_replace = |w,ctx| {},
    on_despawn = |w,ctx| {},
    on_remove = |w,ctx| {}
)]
pub struct FooClosure;

#[derive(Component, Debug)]
#[relationship(relationship_target = FooTargets)]
#[component(
    on_add = baring_and_bazzing("foo"),
    // on_insert = baring_and_bazzing("foo"),
    // on_replace = baring_and_bazzing("foo"),
    on_despawn = baring_and_bazzing("foo"),
    on_remove = baring_and_bazzing("foo")
)]
pub struct FooTargetOf(Entity);

#[derive(Component, Debug)]
#[relationship_target(relationship = FooTargetOf)]
#[component(
    on_add = |w,ctx| {},
    on_insert = |w,ctx| {},
    // on_replace = |w,ctx| {},
    // on_despawn = |w,ctx| {},
    on_remove = |w,ctx| {}
)]
pub struct FooTargets(Vec<Entity>);

// MSG:  mismatched types  expected fn pointer `for<'w> fn(bevy::bevy_ecs::world::DeferredWorld<'w>, bevy::bevy_ecs::component::HookContext)`    found struct `Bar`
//
// pub struct Bar;
// #[derive(Component)]
// #[component(
//     on_add = Bar,
// )]
// pub struct FooWrongPath;

// MSG: this function takes 1 argument but 2 arguements were supplied
//
// #[derive(Component)]
// #[component(
//     on_add = wrong_bazzing("foo"),
// )]
// pub struct FooWrongCall;
//
// fn wrong_bazzing(path: &str) -> impl Fn(bevy::ecs::world::DeferredWorld) {
//     |world| {}
// }

// MSG: expected 1 argument, found 2
//
// #[derive(Component)]
// #[component(
//     on_add = |w| {},
// )]
// pub struct FooWrongCall;
```

---

## Showcase

I'll try to continue to work on this to have a small section in the
release notes.
2025-03-06 16:39:11 +00:00
Carter Anderson
06cb5c5fd9
Fix Component require() IDE integration (#18165)
# Objective

Component `require()` IDE integration is fully broken, as of #16575.

## Solution

This reverts us back to the previous "put the docs on Component trait"
impl. This _does_ reduce the accessibility of the required components in
rust docs, but the complete erasure of "required component IDE
experience" is not worth the price of slightly increased prominence of
requires in docs.

Additionally, Rust Analyzer has recently started including derive
attributes in suggestions, so we aren't losing that benefit of the
proc_macro attribute impl.
2025-03-06 02:44:47 +00:00
Carter Anderson
a530c07bc5
Preserve spawned RelationshipTarget order and other improvements (#17858)
Fixes #17720

## Objective

Spawning RelationshipTargets from scenes currently fails to preserve
RelationshipTarget ordering (ex: `Children` has an arbitrary order).
This is because it uses the normal hook flow to set up the collection,
which means we are pushing onto the collection in _spawn order_ (which
is currently in archetype order, which will often produce mismatched
orderings).

We need to preserve the ordering in the original RelationshipTarget
collection. Ideally without expensive checking / fixups.

## Solution

One solution would be to spawn in hierarchy-order. However this gets
complicated as there can be multiple hierarchies, and it also means we
can't spawn in more cache-friendly orders (ex: the current per-archetype
spawning, or future even-smarter per-table spawning). Additionally,
same-world cloning has _slightly_ more nuanced needs (ex: recursively
clone linked relationships, while maintaining _original_ relationships
outside of the tree via normal hooks).

The preferred approach is to directly spawn the remapped
RelationshipTarget collection, as this trivially preserves the ordering.
Unfortunately we can't _just_ do that, as when we spawn the children
with their Relationships (ex: `ChildOf`), that will insert a duplicate.

We could "fixup" the collection retroactively by just removing the back
half of duplicates, but this requires another pass / more lookups /
allocating twice as much space. Additionally, it becomes complicated
because observers could insert additional children, making it harder
(aka more expensive) to determine which children are dupes and which are
not.

The path I chose is to support "opting out" of the relationship target
hook in the contexts that need that, as this allows us to just cheaply
clone the mapped collection. The relationship hook can look for this
configuration when it runs and skip its logic when that happens. A
"simple" / small-amount-of-code way to do this would be to add a "skip
relationship spawn" flag to World. Sadly, any hook / observer that runs
_as the result of an insert_ would also read this flag. We really need a
way to scope this setting to a _specific_ insert.

Therefore I opted to add a new `RelationshipInsertHookMode` enum and an
`entity.insert_with_relationship_insert_hook_mode` variant. Obviously
this is verbose and ugly. And nobody wants _more_ insert variants. But
sadly this was the best I could come up with from a performance and
capability perspective. If you have alternatives let me know!

There are three variants:

1. `RelationshipInsertHookMode::Run`: always run relationship insert
hooks (this is the default)
2. `RelationshipInsertHookMode::Skip`: do not run any relationship
insert hooks for this insert (this is used by spawner code)
3. `RelationshipInsertHookMode::RunIfNotLinked`: only run hooks for
_unlinked_ relationships (this is used in same-world recursive entity
cloning to preserve relationships outside of the deep-cloned tree)

Note that I have intentionally only added "insert with relationship hook
mode" variants to the cases we absolutely need (everything else uses the
default `Run` mode), just to keep the code size in check. I do not think
we should add more without real _very necessary_ use cases.

I also made some other minor tweaks:

1. I split out `SourceComponent` from `ComponentCloneCtx`. Reading the
source component no longer needlessly blocks mutable access to
`ComponentCloneCtx`.
2. Thanks to (1), I've removed the `RefCell` wrapper over the cloned
component queue.
3. (1) also allowed me to write to the EntityMapper while queuing up
clones, meaning we can reserve entities during the component clone and
write them to the mapper _before_ inserting the component, meaning
cloned collections can be mapped on insert.
4. I've removed the closure from `write_target_component_ptr` to
simplify the API / make it compatible with the split `SourceComponent`
approach.
5. I've renamed `EntityCloner::recursive` to
`EntityCloner::linked_cloning` to connect that feature more directly
with `RelationshipTarget::LINKED_SPAWN`
6. I've removed `EntityCloneBehavior::RelationshipTarget`. This was
always intended to be temporary, and this new behavior removes the need
for it.

---------

Co-authored-by: Viktor Gustavsson <villor94@gmail.com>
2025-03-05 22:18:57 +00:00
Chris Russell
1f6642df4c
Fix unsound query transmutes on queries obtained from Query::as_readonly() (#17973)
# Objective

Fix unsound query transmutes on queries obtained from
`Query::as_readonly()`.

The following compiles, and the call to `transmute_lens()` should panic,
but does not:
```rust
fn bad_system(query: Query<&mut A>) {
    let mut readonly = query.as_readonly();
    let mut lens: QueryLens<&mut A> = readonly.transmute_lens();
    let other_readonly: Query<&A> = query.as_readonly();
    // `lens` and `other_readonly` alias, and are both alive here!
}
```

To make `Query::as_readonly()` zero-cost, we pointer-cast
`&QueryState<D, F>` to `&QueryState<D::ReadOnly, F>`. This means that
the `component_access` for a read-only query's state may include
accesses for the original mutable version, but the `Query` does not have
exclusive access to those components! `transmute` and `join` use that
access to ensure that a join is valid, and will incorrectly allow a
transmute that includes mutable access.

As a bonus, allow `Query::join`s that output `FilteredEntityRef` or
`FilteredEntityMut` to receive access from the `other` query. Currently
they only receive access from `self`.

## Solution

When transmuting or joining from a read-only query, remove any writes
before performing checking that the transmute is valid. For joins, be
sure to handle the case where one input query was the result of
`as_readonly()` but the other has valid mutable access.

This requires identifying read-only queries, so add a
`QueryData::IS_READ_ONLY` associated constant. Note that we only call
`QueryState::as_transmuted_state()` with `NewD: ReadOnlyQueryData`, so
checking for read-only queries is sufficient to check for
`as_transmuted_state()`.

Removing writes requires allocating a new `FilteredAccess`, so only do
so if the query is read-only and the state has writes. Otherwise, the
existing access is correct and we can continue using a reference to it.

Use the new read-only state to call `NewD::set_access`, so that
transmuting to a `FilteredAccessMut` results in a read-only
`FilteredAccessMut`. Otherwise, it would take the original write access,
and then the transmute would panic because it had too much access.

Note that `join` was previously passing `self.component_access` to
`NewD::set_access`. Switching it to `joined_component_access` also
allows a join that outputs `FilteredEntity(Ref|Mut)` to receive access
from `other`. The fact that it didn't do that before seems like an
oversight, so I didn't try to prevent that change.

## Testing

Added unit tests with the unsound transmute and join.
2025-03-04 19:26:31 +00:00
GlFolker
c819beb02c
Emphasize no structural changes in SystemParam::get_param (#17996)
# Objective

Many systems like `Schedule` rely on the fact that every structural ECS
changes are deferred until an exclusive system flushes the `World`
itself. This gives us the benefits of being able to run systems in
parallel without worrying about dangling references caused by memory
(re)allocations, which will in turn lead to **Undefined Behavior**.
However, this isn't explicitly documented in `SystemParam`; currently it
only vaguely hints that in `init_state`, based on the fact that
structural ECS changes require mutable access to the _whole_ `World`.

## Solution

Document this behavior explicitly in `SystemParam`'s type-level
documentations.
2025-03-04 18:09:39 +00:00
Zachary Harrold
ff1143ec87
Remove deprecated component_reads_and_writes (#16348)
# Objective

- Fixes #16339

## Solution

- Replaced `component_reads_and_writes` and `component_writes` with
`try_iter_component_access`.

## Testing

- Ran `dynamic` example to confirm behaviour is unchanged.
- CI

---

## Migration Guide

The following methods (some removed in previous PRs) are now replaced by
`Access::try_iter_component_access`:

* `Access::component_reads_and_writes`
* `Access::component_reads`
* `Access::component_writes`

As `try_iter_component_access` returns a `Result`, you'll now need to
handle the failing case (e.g., `unwrap()`). There is currently a single
failure mode, `UnboundedAccess`, which occurs when the `Access` is for
all `Components` _except_ certain exclusions. Since this list is
infinite, there is no meaningful way for `Access` to provide an
iterator. Instead, get a list of components (e.g., from the `Components`
structure) and iterate over that instead, filtering using
`Access::has_component_read`, `Access::has_component_write`, etc.

Additionally, you'll need to `filter_map` the accesses based on which
method you're attempting to replace:

* `Access::component_reads_and_writes` -> `Exclusive(_) | Shared(_)`
* `Access::component_reads` -> `Shared(_)`
* `Access::component_writes` -> `Exclusive(_)`

To ease migration, please consider the below extension trait which you
can include in your project:

```rust
pub trait AccessCompatibilityExt {
    /// Returns the indices of the components this has access to.
    fn component_reads_and_writes(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_;

    /// Returns the indices of the components this has non-exclusive access to.
    fn component_reads(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_;

    /// Returns the indices of the components this has exclusive access to.
    fn component_writes(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_;
}

impl<T: SparseSetIndex> AccessCompatibilityExt for Access<T> {
    fn component_reads_and_writes(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_ {
        self
            .try_iter_component_access()
            .expect("Access is unbounded. Please refactor the usage of this method to directly use try_iter_component_access")
            .filter_map(|component_access| {
                let index = component_access.index().sparse_set_index();

                match component_access {
                    ComponentAccessKind::Archetypal(_) => None,
                    ComponentAccessKind::Shared(_) => Some(index),
                    ComponentAccessKind::Exclusive(_) => Some(index),
                }
            })
    }

    fn component_reads(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_ {
        self
            .try_iter_component_access()
            .expect("Access is unbounded. Please refactor the usage of this method to directly use try_iter_component_access")
            .filter_map(|component_access| {
                let index = component_access.index().sparse_set_index();

                match component_access {
                    ComponentAccessKind::Archetypal(_) => None,
                    ComponentAccessKind::Shared(_) => Some(index),
                    ComponentAccessKind::Exclusive(_) => None,
                }
            })
    }

    fn component_writes(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = T> + '_ {
        self
            .try_iter_component_access()
            .expect("Access is unbounded. Please refactor the usage of this method to directly use try_iter_component_access")
            .filter_map(|component_access| {
                let index = component_access.index().sparse_set_index();

                match component_access {
                    ComponentAccessKind::Archetypal(_) => None,
                    ComponentAccessKind::Shared(_) => None,
                    ComponentAccessKind::Exclusive(_) => Some(index),
                }
            })
    }
}
```

Please take note of the use of `expect(...)` in these methods. You
should consider using these as a starting point for a more appropriate
migration based on your specific needs.

## Notes

- This new method is fallible based on whether the `Access` is bounded
or unbounded (unbounded occurring with inverted component sets). If
bounded, will return an iterator of every item and its access level. I
believe this makes sense without exposing implementation details around
`Access`.
- The access level is defined by an `enum` `ComponentAccessKind<T>`,
either `Archetypical`, `Shared`, or `Exclusive`. As a convenience, this
`enum` has a method `index` to get the inner `T` value without a match
statement. It does add more code, but the API is clearer.
- Within `QueryBuilder` this new method simplifies several pieces of
logic without changing behaviour.
- Within `QueryState` the logic is simplified and the amount of
iteration is reduced, potentially improving performance.
- Within the `dynamic` example it has identical behaviour, with the
inversion footgun explicitly highlighted by an `unwrap`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mike <2180432+hymm@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-03-04 08:22:29 +00:00
Dmytro Banin
7a1972ed3d
One-to-One Relationships (#18087)
# Objective

Minimal implementation of directed one-to-one relationships via
implementing `RelationshipSourceCollection` for `Entity`.

Now you can do

```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[relationship(relationship_target = Below)]
pub struct Above(Entity);

#[derive(Component)]
#[relationship_target(relationship = Above)]
pub struct Below(Entity);
```

## Future Work

It would be nice if the relationships could be fully symmetrical in the
future - in the example above, since `Above` is the source of truth you
can't add `Below` to an entity and have `Above` added automatically.

## Testing

Wrote unit tests for new relationship sources and and verified
adding/removing relationships maintains connection as expected.
2025-03-04 07:57:35 +00:00
Ben Frankel
0a841ba9c1
Cache systems by S instead of S::System (#16694)
# Objective

- Fixes the issue described in this comment:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/16680#issuecomment-2522764239.

## Solution

- Cache one-shot systems by `S: IntoSystem` (which is const-asserted to
be a ZST) rather than `S::System`.

## Testing

Added a new unit test named `cached_system_into_same_system_type` to
`system_registry.rs`.

---

## Migration Guide

The `CachedSystemId` resource has been changed:

```rust
// Before:
let cached_id = CachedSystemId::<S::System>(id);
assert!(id == cached_id.0);

// After:
let cached_id = CachedSystemId::<S>::new(id);
assert!(id == SystemId::from_entity(cached_id.entity));
```
2025-03-04 07:31:10 +00:00
Tim Overbeek
173680944f
fix generics for relationships (#18136)
# Objective
Allow Relationship to be derived for structs with generics.

fixes #18133
## Solution

"X" inside #[relationship_target(relationship = X)] was previously
parsed as Idents,
now they are parsed as syn::Type

## Testing

```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[relationship(relationship_target = Attachments<T>)]
pub struct AttachedTo<T: Send + Sync + 'static> {
    #[relationship]
    pub entity: Entity,
    pub marker: PhantomData<T>,
}

#[derive(Component)]
#[relationship_target(relationship = AttachedTo<T>)]
pub struct Attachments<T: Send + Sync + 'static> {
    #[relationship]
    entities: Vec<Entity>,
    pub marker: PhantomData<T>,
}
```
This now compiles!
2025-03-03 19:33:29 +00:00
Nathan Fenner
755adae0f8
fix test for .iter().sort() to include data to sort (#18127)
The test case `query_iter_sorts` was doing lots of comparisons to ensure
that various query arrays were sorted, but the arrays were all empty.

This PR spawns some entities so that the entity lists to compare not
empty, and sorting can actually be tested for correctness.
2025-03-03 06:24:43 +00:00
Alice Cecile
2ad5908e58
Make Query::single (and friends) return a Result (#18082)
# Objective

As discussed in #14275, Bevy is currently too prone to panic, and makes
the easy / beginner-friendly way to do a large number of operations just
to panic on failure.

This is seriously frustrating in library code, but also slows down
development, as many of the `Query::single` panics can actually safely
be an early return (these panics are often due to a small ordering issue
or a change in game state.

More critically, in most "finished" products, panics are unacceptable:
any unexpected failures should be handled elsewhere. That's where the
new

With the advent of good system error handling, we can now remove this.

Note: I was instrumental in a) introducing this idea in the first place
and b) pushing to make the panicking variant the default. The
introduction of both `let else` statements in Rust and the fancy system
error handling work in 0.16 have changed my mind on the right balance
here.

## Solution

1. Make `Query::single` and `Query::single_mut` (and other random
related methods) return a `Result`.
2. Handle all of Bevy's internal usage of these APIs.
3. Deprecate `Query::get_single` and friends, since we've moved their
functionality to the nice names.
4. Add detailed advice on how to best handle these errors.

Generally I like the diff here, although `get_single().unwrap()` in
tests is a bit of a downgrade.

## Testing

I've done a global search for `.single` to track down any missed
deprecated usages.

As to whether or not all the migrations were successful, that's what CI
is for :)

## Future work

~~Rename `Query::get_single` and friends to `Query::single`!~~

~~I've opted not to do this in this PR, and smear it across two releases
in order to ease the migration. Successive deprecations are much easier
to manage than the semantics and types shifting under your feet.~~

Cart has convinced me to change my mind on this; see
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/18082#discussion_r1974536085.

## Migration guide

`Query::single`, `Query::single_mut` and their `QueryState` equivalents
now return a `Result`. Generally, you'll want to:

1. Use Bevy 0.16's system error handling to return a `Result` using the
`?` operator.
2. Use a `let else Ok(data)` block to early return if it's an expected
failure.
3. Use `unwrap()` or `Ok` destructuring inside of tests.

The old `Query::get_single` (etc) methods which did this have been
deprecated.
2025-03-02 19:51:56 +00:00
RobWalt
73ffd9a508
chore: update compile fail test stderr files (#18056)
I noticed this while working on #18017 . Some of the `stderr`
compile_fail tests were updated while I generated the output for the new
tests I introduced in the mentioned PR.

I'm on rust 1.85.0
2025-03-01 00:31:55 +00:00
JaySpruce
ad1691e44a
Update EntityCommands::trigger to check for the entity's existence (#18071)
## Objective

`EntityCommands::trigger` internally uses `Commands::trigger_targets`,
which means it gets queued using `Commands::queue` rather
`EntityCommands::queue`. This previously wouldn't have made much
difference, but now entity commands check whether the entity exists, and
that check never happens in this case.

## Solution

- Add `entity_command::trigger`, which calls the same function as before
(`World::trigger_targets_with_caller`) but through the `EntityWorldMut`
passed to entity commands.
- Change `EntityCommands::trigger` to queue the new entity command
normally.
2025-03-01 00:08:03 +00:00
Greeble
780f658f2c
Update ChildOf deprecation advice to match new layout (#18089)
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/17905 replaced `ChildOf(entity)`
with `ChildOf { parent: entity }`, but some deprecation advice was
overlooked. Also corrected formatting in documentation.

## Testing

Added a `set_parent` to a random example. Confirmed that the deprecation
warning shows and the advice can be pasted in.
2025-02-28 23:15:23 +00:00
Carter Anderson
b73811d40e
Remove ChildOf::get and Deref impl (#18080)
# Objective

There are currently three ways to access the parent stored on a ChildOf
relationship:

1. `child_of.parent` (field accessor)
2. `child_of.get()` (get function)
3. `**child_of` (Deref impl)

I will assert that we should only have one (the field accessor), and
that the existence of the other implementations causes confusion and
legibility issues. The deref approach is heinous, and `child_of.get()`
is significantly less clear than `child_of.parent`.

## Solution

Remove `impl Deref for ChildOf` and `ChildOf::get`.

The one "downside" I'm seeing is that:

```rust
entity.get::<ChildOf>().map(ChildOf::get)
```
Becomes this:

```rust
entity.get::<ChildOf>().map(|c| c.parent)
```

I strongly believe that this is worth the increased clarity and
consistency. I'm also not really a huge fan of the "pass function
pointer to map" syntax. I think most people don't think this way about
maps. They think in terms of a function that takes the item in the
Option and returns the result of some action on it.

## Migration Guide

```rust
// Before
**child_of
// After
child_of.parent

// Before
child_of.get()
// After
child_of.parent

// Before
entity.get::<ChildOf>().map(ChildOf::get)
// After
entity.get::<ChildOf>().map(|c| c.parent)
```
2025-02-27 23:11:03 +00:00
JaySpruce
058497e0bb
Change Commands::get_entity to return Result and remove panic from Commands::entity (#18043)
## Objective

Alternative to #18001.

- Now that systems can handle the `?` operator, `get_entity` returning
`Result` would be more useful than `Option`.
- With `get_entity` being more flexible, combined with entity commands
now checking the entity's existence automatically, the panic in `entity`
isn't really necessary.

## Solution

- Changed `Commands::get_entity` to return `Result<EntityCommands,
EntityDoesNotExistError>`.
- Removed panic from `Commands::entity`.
2025-02-27 21:05:16 +00:00
Tim Overbeek
ccb7069e7f
Change ChildOf to Childof { parent: Entity} and support deriving Relationship and RelationshipTarget with named structs (#17905)
# Objective

fixes #17896 

## Solution

Change ChildOf ( Entity ) to ChildOf { parent: Entity }

by doing this we also allow users to use named structs for relationship
derives, When you have more than 1 field in a struct with named fields
the macro will look for a field with the attribute #[relationship] and
all of the other fields should implement the Default trait. Unnamed
fields are still supported.

When u have a unnamed struct with more than one field the macro will
fail.
Do we want to support something like this ? 

```rust
 #[derive(Component)]
 #[relationship_target(relationship = ChildOf)]
 pub struct Children (#[relationship] Entity, u8);
```
I could add this, it but doesn't seem nice.
## Testing

crates/bevy_ecs - cargo test


## Showcase


```rust

use bevy_ecs::component::Component;
use bevy_ecs::entity::Entity;

 #[derive(Component)]
 #[relationship(relationship_target = Children)]
 pub struct ChildOf {
     #[relationship]
     pub parent: Entity,
     internal: u8,
 };

 #[derive(Component)]
 #[relationship_target(relationship = ChildOf)]
 pub struct Children {
     children: Vec<Entity>
 };

```

---------

Co-authored-by: Tim Overbeek <oorbecktim@Tims-MacBook-Pro.local>
Co-authored-by: Tim Overbeek <oorbecktim@c-001-001-042.client.nl.eduvpn.org>
Co-authored-by: Tim Overbeek <oorbecktim@c-001-001-059.client.nl.eduvpn.org>
Co-authored-by: Tim Overbeek <oorbecktim@c-001-001-054.client.nl.eduvpn.org>
Co-authored-by: Tim Overbeek <oorbecktim@c-001-001-027.client.nl.eduvpn.org>
2025-02-27 19:22:17 +00:00
JaySpruce
67146bdef7
Add missing unsafe to entity_command::insert_by_id and make it more configurable (#18052)
## Objective

`insert_by_id` is unsafe, but I forgot to add that to the
manually-queueable version in `entity_command`.

It also can only insert using `InsertMode::Replace`, when it could
easily be configurable by threading an `InsertMode` parameter to the
final `BundleInserter::insert` call.

## Solution

- Add `unsafe` and safety comment.
- Add `InsertMode` parameter to `entity_command::insert_by_id`,
`EntityWorldMut::insert_by_id_with_caller`, and
`EntityWorldMut::insert_dynamic_bundle`.
- Add `InsertMode` parameter to `entity_command::insert` and remove
`entity_command::insert_if_new`, for consistency with the other
manually-queued insertion commands.
2025-02-27 06:20:32 +00:00
urben1680
2f384643c3
Bubble sync points if ignore_deferred, do not ignore if target system is exclusive (#17880)
# Objective

Fixes #17828

This fixes two bugs:

1. Exclusive systems should see the effect of all commands queued to
that point. That does not happen when the system is configured with
`*_ignore_deferred` which may lead to surprising situations. These
configurations should not behave like that.
2. If `*_ignore_deferred` is used, no sync point may be added at all
**after** the config. Currently this can happen if the last nodes in
that config have no deferred parameters themselves. Instead, sync points
should always be added after such a config, so long systems have
deferred parameters.

## Solution

1. When adding sync points on edges, do not consider
`AutoInsertApplyDeferredPass::no_sync_edges` if the target is an
exclusive system.
2. when going through the nodes in a directed way, store the information
that `AutoInsertApplyDeferredPass::no_sync_edges` suppressed adding a
sync point at the target node. Then, when the target node is evaluated
later by the iteration and that prior suppression was the case, the
target node will behave like it has deferred parameters even if the
system itself does not.

## Testing

I added a test for each bug, please let me know if more are wanted and
if yes, which cases you would want to see.
These tests also can be read as examples how the current code would
fail.
2025-02-26 20:39:23 +00:00
Chris Russell
94e6fa168f
Fix unsoundness in QueryIter::sort_by (#17826)
# Objective

`QueryIter::sort_by()` is unsound. It passes the lens items with the
full `'w` lifetime, and a malicious user could smuggle them out of the
closure where they could alias with the query results.

## Solution

Make the sort closures generic in the lifetime parameter of the lens
item. This ensures the lens items cannot outlive the call to the
closure.

## Testing

Added a compile-fail test that demonstrates the unsound pattern.

## Migration Guide

The `sort` family of methods on `QueryIter` unsoundly gave access
`L::Item<'w>` with the full `'w` lifetime. It has been shortened to
`L::Item<'w>` so that items cannot escape the comparer. If you get
lifetime errors using these methods, you will need to make the comparer
generic in the new lifetime. Often this can be done by replacing named
`'w` with `'_`, or by replacing the use of a function item with a
closure.

```rust
// Before: Now fails with "error: implementation of `FnMut` is not general enough"
query.iter().sort_by::<&C>(Ord::cmp);
// After: Wrap in a closure
query.iter().sort_by::<&C>(|l, r| Ord::cmp(l, r));

query.iter().sort_by::<&C>(comparer);
// Before: Uses specific `'w` lifetime from some outer scope
// now fails with "error: implementation of `FnMut` is not general enough"
fn comparer(left: &&'w C, right: &&'w C) -> Ordering { /* ... */ }
// After: Accepts any lifetime using inferred lifetime parameter
fn comparer(left: &&C, right: &&C) -> Ordering { /* ... */ }
2025-02-26 20:36:37 +00:00
Sou1gh0st
f2b37c733e
Deduplicate register_inherited_required_components (#16519)
# Objective
- Fixes #16416 

## Solution
- Add a intermediate temporary mutable `RequiredComponents` to get avoid
of the borrowing issues.

## Testing

- I have run `cargo test --package bevy_ecs -- --exact --show-output`
and past all the tests.
2025-02-25 23:59:58 +00:00
SpecificProtagonist
25cee420e4
do_not_recommend interned Labels (#17950)
# Objective

Follow up on #17441 now that `do_not_recommend` is stable.

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-02-25 23:46:21 +00:00
JaySpruce
36a2f7fdf1
Remove unnecessary bounds on EntityClonerBuilder::without_required_components (#17969)
## Objective

The closure argument for
`EntityClonerBuilder::without_required_components` has `Send + Sync +
'static` bounds, but the closure immediately gets called and never needs
to be sent anywhere. (This was my fault :P )

## Solution

Remove the bounds so that users aren't unnecessarily restricted.

I also took the opportunity to expand the tests a little.
2025-02-25 23:34:46 +00:00
Tristan Maindron
0f153ffb44
Prevent last_trigger_id from overflowing (#17978)
# Objective

This prevents overflowing the `last_trigger_id` property that leads to a
panic in debug mode.

```bash
panicked at C:\XXX\.cargo\registry\src\index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f\bevy_ecs-0.15.2\src\world\unsafe_world_cell.rs:630:18:
attempt to add with overflow
Encountered a panic when applying buffers for system `bevy_sprite::calculate_bounds_2d`!
Encountered a panic in system `bevy_ecs::schedule::executor::apply_deferred`!
```

## Solution

As this value is only used for detecting a change, we can wrap when it
reaches max value.

## Testing

This can be verified by running `cargo run --example observers`
2025-02-25 23:12:51 +00:00
Brezak
b43c8f8c4f
Add methods to add single entity relationships (#18038)
# Objective

Closes #17572

## Solution

Add the `add_one_related` methods to `EntityCommands` and
`EntityWorldMut`.

## Testing

Clippy

---

## Showcase

The `EntityWorldMut` and `FilteredResourcesMut` now include the
`add_one_related` method if you just want to relate 2 entities.
2025-02-25 23:07:44 +00:00
Zachary Harrold
20813aed64
Handle TriggerTargets that are combinations for components/entities (#18024)
# Objective

* Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14074
* Applies CI fixes for #16326

It is currently not possible to issues a trigger that targets a specific
list of components AND a specific list of entities

## Solution

We can now use `((A, B), (entity_1, entity_2))` as a trigger target, as
well as the reverse

## Testing

Added a unit test.

The triggering rules for observers are quite confusing:

Triggers once per entity target

For each entity target, an observer system triggers if any of its
components matches the trigger target components (but it triggers at
most once, since we use an internal counter to make sure that an
observer can run at most once per entity target)

(copied from #14563)
(copied from #16326)

## Notes

All credit to @BenjaminBrienen and @cBournhonesque! Just applying a
small fix to this PR so it can be merged.

---------

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <Benjamin.Brienen@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <xdotdash@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-02-24 23:57:34 +00:00
VitalyR
6bae04ab36
Add usage notes for register_component (#18011)
# Objective

- Add usage notes for `register_component`, fixes #16447


## Testing

CI
2025-02-24 21:47:25 +00:00
Vic
a1717331e4
implement UniqueEntityArray (#17954)
# Objective

Continuation of #17589 and #16547.

`get_many` is last of the `many` methods with a missing `unique`
counterpart.
It both takes and returns arrays, thus necessitates a matching
`UniqueEntityArray` type!
Plus, some slice methods involve returning arrays, which are currently
missing from `UniqueEntitySlice`.

## Solution

Add the type, the related methods and trait impls.

Note that for this PR, we abstain from some methods/trait impls that
create `&mut UniqueEntityArray`, because it can be successfully
mem-swapped. This can potentially invalidate a larger slice, which is
the same reason we punted on some mutable slice methods in #17589. We
can follow-up on all of these together in a following PR.

The new `unique_array` module is not glob-exported, because the trait
alias `unique_array::IntoIter` would conflict with
`unique_vec::IntoIter`.
The solution for this is to make the various `unique_*` modules public,
which I intend to do in yet another PR.
2025-02-24 21:36:59 +00:00
andriyDev
bb09751cf0
Fix observer/hook OnReplace and OnRemove triggering when removing a bundle even when the component is not present on the entity (#17942)
# Objective

- Fixes #17897.

## Solution

- When removing components, we filter the list of components in the
removed bundle based on whether they are actually in the archetype.

## Testing

- Added a test.
2025-02-24 21:25:31 +00:00
Zachary Harrold
76e9bf9c99
Automatically enable portable-atomic when required (#17570)
# Objective

- Contributes to #15460
- Reduce quantity and complexity of feature gates across Bevy

## Solution

- Used `target_has_atomic` configuration variable to automatically
detect impartial atomic support and automatically switch to
`portable-atomic` over the standard library on an as-required basis.

## Testing

- CI

## Notes

To explain the technique employed here, consider getting `Arc` either
from `alloc::sync` _or_ `portable-atomic-util`. First, we can inspect
the `alloc` crate to see that you only have access to `Arc` _if_
`target_has_atomic = "ptr"`. We add a target dependency for this
particular configuration _inverted_:

```toml
[target.'cfg(not(target_has_atomic = "ptr"))'.dependencies]
portable-atomic-util = { version = "0.2.4", default-features = false }
```

This ensures we only have the dependency when it is needed, and it is
entirely excluded from the dependency graph when it is not. Next, we
adjust our configuration flags to instead of checking for `feature =
"portable-atomic"` to instead check for `target_has_atomic = "ptr"`:

```rust
// `alloc` feature flag hidden for brevity

#[cfg(not(target_has_atomic = "ptr"))]
use portable_atomic_util as arc;

#[cfg(target_has_atomic = "ptr")]
use alloc::sync as arc;

pub use arc::{Arc, Weak};
```

The benefits of this technique are three-fold:

1. For platforms without full atomic support, the functionality is
enabled automatically.
2. For platforms with atomic support, the dependency is never included,
even if a feature was enabled using `--all-features` (for example)
3. The `portable-atomic` feature no longer needs to virally spread to
all user-facing crates, it's instead something handled within
`bevy_platform_support` (with some extras where other dependencies also
need their features enabled).
2025-02-24 20:52:46 +00:00
andriyDev
7f14581495
Use explicitly added ApplyDeferred stages when computing automatically inserted sync points. (#16782)
# Objective

- The previous implementation of automatically inserting sync points did
not consider explicitly added sync points. This created additional sync
points. For example:

```
A-B
C-D-E
```

If `A` and `B` needed a sync point, and `D` was an `ApplyDeferred`, an
additional sync point would be generated between `A` and `B`.

```
A-D2-B
C-D -E
```

This can result in the following system ordering:
```
A-D2-(B-C)-D-E
```
Where only `B` and `C` run in parallel. If we could reuse `D` as the
sync point, we would get the following ordering:
```
(A-C)-D-(B-E)
```
Now we have two more opportunities for parallelism!

## Solution

- In the first pass, we:
    - Compute the number of sync points before each node
- This was already happening but now we consider `ApplyDeferred` nodes
as creating a sync point.
- Pick an arbitrary explicit `ApplyDeferred` node for each "sync point
index" that we can (some required sync points may be missing!)
- In the second pass, we:
- For each edge, if two nodes have a different number of sync points
before them then there must be a sync point between them.
- Look for an explicit `ApplyDeferred`. If one exists, use it as the
sync point.
    - Otherwise, generate a new sync point.

I believe this should also gracefully handle changes to the
`ScheduleGraph`. Since automatically inserted sync points are inserted
as systems, they won't look any different to explicit sync points, so
they are also candidates for "reusing" sync points.

One thing this solution does not handle is "deduping" sync points. If
you add 10 sync points explicitly, there will be at least 10 sync
points. You could keep track of all the sync points at the same
"distance" and then hack apart the graph to dedup those, but that could
be a follow-up step (and it's more complicated since you have to worry
about transferring edges between nodes).

## Testing

- Added a test to test the feature.
-  The existing tests from all our crates still pass.

## Showcase

- Automatically inserted sync points can now reuse explicitly inserted
`ApplyDeferred` systems! Previously, Bevy would add new sync points
between systems, ignoring the explicitly added sync points. This would
reduce parallelism of systems in some situations. Now, the parallelism
has been improved!
2025-02-24 20:51:34 +00:00
Zachary Harrold
5241e09671
Upgrade to Rust Edition 2024 (#17967)
# Objective

- Fixes #17960

## Solution

- Followed the [edition upgrade
guide](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/editions/transitioning-an-existing-project-to-a-new-edition.html)

## Testing

- CI

---

## Summary of Changes

### Documentation Indentation

When using lists in documentation, proper indentation is now linted for.
This means subsequent lines within the same list item must start at the
same indentation level as the item.

```rust
/* Valid */
/// - Item 1
///   Run-on sentence.
/// - Item 2
struct Foo;

/* Invalid */
/// - Item 1
///     Run-on sentence.
/// - Item 2
struct Foo;
```

### Implicit `!` to `()` Conversion

`!` (the never return type, returned by `panic!`, etc.) no longer
implicitly converts to `()`. This is particularly painful for systems
with `todo!` or `panic!` statements, as they will no longer be functions
returning `()` (or `Result<()>`), making them invalid systems for
functions like `add_systems`. The ideal fix would be to accept functions
returning `!` (or rather, _not_ returning), but this is blocked on the
[stabilisation of the `!` type
itself](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.never.html), which is
not done.

The "simple" fix would be to add an explicit `-> ()` to system
signatures (e.g., `|| { todo!() }` becomes `|| -> () { todo!() }`).
However, this is _also_ banned, as there is an existing lint which (IMO,
incorrectly) marks this as an unnecessary annotation.

So, the "fix" (read: workaround) is to put these kinds of `|| -> ! { ...
}` closuers into variables and give the variable an explicit type (e.g.,
`fn()`).

```rust
// Valid
let system: fn() = || todo!("Not implemented yet!");
app.add_systems(..., system);

// Invalid
app.add_systems(..., || todo!("Not implemented yet!"));
```

### Temporary Variable Lifetimes

The order in which temporary variables are dropped has changed. The
simple fix here is _usually_ to just assign temporaries to a named
variable before use.

### `gen` is a keyword

We can no longer use the name `gen` as it is reserved for a future
generator syntax. This involved replacing uses of the name `gen` with
`r#gen` (the raw-identifier syntax).

### Formatting has changed

Use statements have had the order of imports changed, causing a
substantial +/-3,000 diff when applied. For now, I have opted-out of
this change by amending `rustfmt.toml`

```toml
style_edition = "2021"
```

This preserves the original formatting for now, reducing the size of
this PR. It would be a simple followup to update this to 2024 and run
`cargo fmt`.

### New `use<>` Opt-Out Syntax

Lifetimes are now implicitly included in RPIT types. There was a handful
of instances where it needed to be added to satisfy the borrow checker,
but there may be more cases where it _should_ be added to avoid
breakages in user code.

### `MyUnitStruct { .. }` is an invalid pattern

Previously, you could match against unit structs (and unit enum
variants) with a `{ .. }` destructuring. This is no longer valid.

### Pretty much every use of `ref` and `mut` are gone

Pattern binding has changed to the point where these terms are largely
unused now. They still serve a purpose, but it is far more niche now.

### `iter::repeat(...).take(...)` is bad

New lint recommends using the more explicit `iter::repeat_n(..., ...)`
instead.

## Migration Guide

The lifetimes of functions using return-position impl-trait (RPIT) are
likely _more_ conservative than they had been previously. If you
encounter lifetime issues with such a function, please create an issue
to investigate the addition of `+ use<...>`.

## Notes

- Check the individual commits for a clearer breakdown for what
_actually_ changed.

---------

Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
2025-02-24 03:54:47 +00:00
JaySpruce
283654cf4d
Small Commands error handling cleanup (#17904)
- Remove references to the short-lived `CommandError` type.
- Add a sentence to the explanation of error handlers.
- Clean up spacing/linebreaks.
- Use `where` notation for command-related trait `impl`s to make the big
ones easier to parse.
2025-02-23 22:41:43 +00:00
AlephCubed
5f86668bbb
Renamed EventWriter::send methods to write. (#17977)
Fixes #17856.

## Migration Guide
- `EventWriter::send` has been renamed to `EventWriter::write`.
- `EventWriter::send_batch` has been renamed to
`EventWriter::write_batch`.
- `EventWriter::send_default` has been renamed to
`EventWriter::write_default`.

---------

Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
2025-02-23 21:18:52 +00:00
DragonGamesStudios
a7cb061d6c
Use fully qualified syntax in assertions. (#17936)
# Objective

Fix #17924 

## Solution

Use fully qualified syntax (`usize::from` rather than `.into()`).

## Testing

Ran a build for the platform specified in the issue.

---------

Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-02-22 01:58:54 +00:00
Christian Hughes
052b9d8261
Fix issue with define_label! instantiation in a 3rd party crate (#17958)
# Objective

Calling `define_label!` in a `no_std` 3rd party crate currently requires
the user to import `Box` themselves due to a non-fully-specified
reference to `Box`.

## Solution

Add a fully specified path for `Box` in the one location necessary, to
match all of the other cases.
2025-02-21 06:13:36 +00:00
Alice Cecile
be3c6f7578
Improve the docs for ChildOf and Children (#17886)
# Context

Renaming `Parent` to `ChildOf` in #17247 has been contentious. While
those users concerns are valid (especially around legibility of code
IMO!), @cart [has
decided](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1340434322833932430)
to stick with the new name.

> In general this conversation is unsurprising to me, as it played out
essentially the same way when I asked for opinions in my PR. There are
strong opinions on both sides. Everyone is right in their own way.
> 
> I chose ChildOf for the following reasons:
> 
> 1. I think it derives naturally from the system we have built, the
concepts we have chosen, and how we generally name the types that
implement a trait in Rust. This is the name of the type implementing
Relationship. We are adding that Relationship component to a given
entity (whether it "is" the relationship or "has" the relationship is
kind of immaterial ... we are naming the relationship that it "is" or
"has"). What is the name of the relationship that a child has to its
parent? It is a "child" of the parent of course!
> 2. In general the non-parent/child relationships I've seen in the wild
generally benefit from (or need to) use the naming convention in (1)
(aka calling the Relationship the name of the relationship the entity
has). Many relationships don't have an equivalent to the Parent/Child
name concept.
> 3. I do think we could get away with using (1) for pretty much
everything else and special casing Parent/Children. But by embracing the
naming convention, we help establish that this is in fact a pattern, and
we help prime people to think about these things in a consistent way.
Consistency and predictability is a generally desirable property. And
for something as divisive and polarizing as relationship naming, I think
drawing a hard line in the sand is to the benefit of the community as a
whole.
> 4. I believe the fact that we dont see as much of the XOf naming style
elsewhere is to our benefit. When people see things in that style, they
are primed to think of them as relationships (after some exposure to
Bevy and the ecosystem). I consider this a useful hint.
> 5. Most of the practical confusion from using ChildOf seems to be from
calling the value of the target field we read from the relationship
child_of. The name of the target field should be parent (we could even
consider renaming child_of.0 to child_of.parent for clarity). I suspect
that existing Bevy users renaming their existing code will feel the most
friction here, as this requires a reframing. Imo it is natural and
expected to receive pushback from these users hitting this case.

## Objective

The new documentation doesn't do a particularly good job at quickly
explaining the meaning of each component or how to work with them;
making a tricky migration more painful and slowing down new users as
they learn about some of the most fundamental types in Bevy.

## Solution

1. Clearly explain what each component does in the very first line,
assuming no background knowledge. This is the first relationships that
99% of users will encounter, so explaining that they are relationships
is unhelpful as an introduction.
2. Add doc aliases for the rejected `IsParent`/`IsChild`/`Parent` names,
to improve autocomplete and doc searching.
3. Do some assorted docs cleanup while we're here.

---------

Co-authored-by: Eagster <79881080+ElliottjPierce@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-02-17 01:46:11 +00:00
JaySpruce
ee44560523
Add EntityDoesNotExistError, replace cases of Entity as an error, do some easy Resultification (#17855)
## Objective
There's no general error for when an entity doesn't exist, and some
methods are going to need one when they get Resultified. The closest
thing is `EntityFetchError`, but that error has a slightly more specific
purpose.

## Solution
- Added `EntityDoesNotExistError`.
  - Contains `Entity` and `EntityDoesNotExistDetails`.
- Changed `EntityFetchError` and `QueryEntityError`:
- Changed `NoSuchEntity` variant to wrap `EntityDoesNotExistError` and
renamed the variant to `EntityDoesNotExist`.
- Renamed `EntityFetchError` to `EntityMutableFetchError` to make its
purpose clearer.
- Renamed `TryDespawnError` to `EntityDespawnError` to make it more
general.
- Changed `World::inspect_entity` to return `Result<[ok],
EntityDoesNotExistError>` instead of panicking.
- Changed `World::get_entity` and `WorldEntityFetch::fetch_ref` to
return `Result<[ok], EntityDoesNotExistError>` instead of `Result<[ok],
Entity>`.
- Changed `UnsafeWorldCell::get_entity` to return
`Result<UnsafeEntityCell, EntityDoesNotExistError>` instead of
`Option<UnsafeEntityCell>`.

## Migration Guide
- `World::inspect_entity` now returns `Result<impl Iterator<Item =
&ComponentInfo>, EntityDoesNotExistError>` instead of `impl
Iterator<Item = &ComponentInfo>`.
- `World::get_entity` now returns `EntityDoesNotExistError` as an error
instead of `Entity`. You can still access the entity's ID through the
error's `entity` field.
- `UnsafeWorldCell::get_entity` now returns `Result<UnsafeEntityCell,
EntityDoesNotExistError>` instead of `Option<UnsafeEntityCell>`.
2025-02-16 21:59:46 +00:00
Chris Russell
794bf6a332
Move implementations of Query methods from QueryState to Query. (#17822)
# Objective

Simplify the API surface by removing duplicated functionality between
`Query` and `QueryState`.

Reduce the amount of `unsafe` code required in `QueryState`.  

This is a follow-up to #15858.

## Solution

Move implementations of `Query` methods from `QueryState` to `Query`.
Instead of the original methods being on `QueryState`, with `Query`
methods calling them by passing the individual parameters, the original
methods are now on `Query`, with `QueryState` methods calling them by
constructing a `Query`.

This also adds two `_inner` methods that were missed in #15858:
`iter_many_unique_inner` and `single_inner`.

One goal here is to be able to deprecate and eventually remove many of
the methods on `QueryState`, reducing the overall API surface. (I
expected to do that in this PR, but this change was large enough on its
own!) Now that the `QueryState` methods each consist of a simple
expression like `self.query(world).get_inner(entity)`, a future PR can
deprecate some or all of them with simple migration instructions.

The other goal is to reduce the amount of `unsafe` code. The current
implementation of a read-only method like `QueryState::get` directly
calls the `unsafe fn get_unchecked_manual` and needs to repeat the proof
that `&World` has enough access. With this change, `QueryState::get` is
entirely safe code, with the proof that `&World` has enough access done
by the `query()` method and shared across all read-only operations.

## Future Work

The next step will be to mark the `QueryState` methods as
`#[deprecated]` and migrate callers to the methods on `Query`.
2025-02-16 19:57:43 +00:00
Chris Russell
0a32450715
Support using FilteredResources with ReflectResource. (#15624)
# Objective

Support accessing resources using reflection when using
`FilteredResources` in a dynamic system. This is similar to how
components can be queried using reflection when using
`FilteredEntityRef|Mut`.

## Solution

Change `ReflectResource` from taking `&World` and `&mut World` to taking
`impl Into<FilteredResources>` and `impl Into<FilteredResourcesMut>`,
similar to how `ReflectComponent` takes `impl Into<FilteredEntityRef>`
and `impl Into<FilteredEntityMut>`. There are `From` impls that ensure
code passing `&World` and `&mut World` continues to work as before.

## Migration Guide

If you are manually creating a `ReflectComponentFns` struct, the
`reflect` function now takes `FilteredResources` instead `&World`, and
there is a new `reflect_mut` function that takes `FilteredResourcesMut`.
2025-02-16 19:56:19 +00:00
Vic
05e61d64f5
implement par_iter_many and par_iter_many_unique (#17815)
# Objective

Continuation of #16547.

We do not yet have parallel versions of `par_iter_many` and
`par_iter_many_unique`. It is currently very painful to try and use
parallel iteration over entity lists. Even if a list is not long, each
operation might still be very expensive, and worth parallelizing.
Plus, it has been requested several times!

## Solution

Once again, we implement what we lack!

These parallel iterators collect their input entity list into a
`Vec`/`UniqueEntityVec`, then chunk that over the available threads,
inspired by the original `par_iter`.

Since no order guarantee is given to the caller, we could sort the input
list according to `EntityLocation`, but that would likely only be worth
it for very large entity lists.

There is some duplication which could likely be improved, but I'd like
to leave that for a follow-up.

## Testing

The doc tests on `for_each_init` of `QueryParManyIter` and
`QueryParManyUniqueIter`.
2025-02-13 19:49:41 +00:00
Rob Parrett
2760692f88
Update typos to 1.29.6 (#17850)
# Objective

Update typos, fix new typos.

1.29.6 was just released to fix an
[issue](https://github.com/crate-ci/typos/issues/1228) where January's
corrections were not included in the binaries for the last release.

Reminder: typos can be tossed in the monthly [non-critical corrections
issue](https://github.com/crate-ci/typos/issues/1221).

## Solution

I chose to allow `implementors`, because a good argument seems to be
being made [here](https://github.com/crate-ci/typos/issues/1226) and
there is now a PR to address that.

## Discussion

Should I exclude `bevy_mikktspace`?

At one point I think we had an informal policy of "don't mess with
mikktspace until https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/9050 is merged"
but it doesn't seem like that is likely to be merged any time soon.

I think these particular corrections in mikktspace are fine because
- The same typo mistake seems to have been fixed in that PR
- The entire file containing these corrections was deleted in that PR

## Typo of the Month

correspindong -> corresponding
2025-02-13 19:44:47 +00:00
Chris Russell
62c1812e72
Shorten the 'world lifetime returned from QueryLens::query(). (#17694)
# Objective

Fix unsoundness introduced by #15858. `QueryLens::query()` would hand
out a `Query` with the full `'w` lifetime, and the new `_inner` methods
would let the results outlive the `Query`. This could be used to create
aliasing mutable references, like

```rust
fn bad<'w>(mut lens: QueryLens<'w, EntityMut>, entity: Entity) {
    let one: EntityMut<'w> = lens.query().get_inner(entity).unwrap();
    let two: EntityMut<'w> = lens.query().get_inner(entity).unwrap();
    assert!(one.entity() == two.entity());
}
```

Fixes #17693 

## Solution

Restrict the `'world` lifetime in the `Query` returned by
`QueryLens::query()` to `'_`, the lifetime of the borrow of the
`QueryLens`.

The model here is that `Query<'w, 's, D, F>` and `QueryLens<'w, D, F>`
have permission to access their components for the lifetime `'w`. So
going from `&'a mut QueryLens<'w>` to `Query<'w, 'a>` would borrow the
permission only for the `'a` lifetime, but incorrectly give it out for
the full `'w` lifetime.

To handle any cases where users were calling `get_inner()` or
`iter_inner()` on the `Query` and expecting the full `'w` lifetime, we
introduce a new `QueryLens::query_inner()` method. This is only valid
for `ReadOnlyQueryData`, so it may safely hand out a copy of the
permission for the full `'w` lifetime. Since `get_inner()` and
`iter_inner()` were only valid on `ReadOnlyQueryData` prior to #15858,
that should cover any uses that relied on the longer lifetime.

## Migration Guide

Users of `QueryLens::query()` who were calling `get_inner()` or
`iter_inner()` will need to replace the call with
`QueryLens::query_inner()`.
2025-02-12 22:41:02 +00:00
Andreas Monitzer
267a0d003c
Add ComponentId-taking functions to Entity{Ref,Mut}Except to mirror FilteredEntity{Ref,Mut} (#17800)
# Objective

Related to #17784. The ticket is actually about just getting rid of
`Entity{Ref,Mut}Except` in favor of `FilteredEntity{Ref,Mut}`, but I got
told the unification of Entity types is a bigger endeavor that has been
going on for a while now (as the "Pointing Fingers" working group) and I
should just add the functions I actually need in the meantime.

## Solution

This PR adds all of the functions necessary to access components by
TypeId or ComponentId instead of static types.

## Testing

> Did you test these changes? If so, how?

Haven't tested it yet, but the changes are mostly copy/paste from other
implementations in the same file, since there is a lot of duplicated
functionality there.

## Not a Migration Guide

There shouldn't be any breaking changes, it's just a few new functions
on existing types.

I had to shuffle around the lifetimes in `From<&EntityMutExcept<'a, B>>
for EntityRefExcept<'a, B>` (originally it was `From<&'a
EntityMutExcept<'_, B>> for EntityRefExcept<'_, B>`) to make the borrow
checker happy, but I don't think that this should have an impact on user
code (correct me if I'm wrong).
2025-02-12 18:34:35 +00:00
Vic
153ce468ef
implement iterators that yield UniqueEntitySlice (#17796)
# Objective

Continuation of #17589 and #16547.

Slices have several methods that return iterators which themselves yield
slices, which we have not yet implemented.
An example use is `par_iter_many` style logic.

## Solution

Their implementation is rather straightforward, we simply delegate all
impls to `[T]`.
The resulting iterator types need their own wrappers in the form of
`UniqueEntitySliceIter` and `UniqueEntitySliceIterMut`.

We also add three free functions that cast slices of entity slices to
slices of `UniqueEntitySlice`.
These three should be sufficient, though infinite nesting is achievable
with a trait (like `TrustedEntityBorrow` works over infinite reference
nesting), should the need ever arise.
2025-02-12 03:59:56 +00:00
Jean Mertz
7d8504f30e
feat(ecs): implement fallible observer systems (#17731)
This commit builds on top of the work done in #16589 and #17051, by
adding support for fallible observer systems.

As with the previous work, the actual results of the observer system are
suppressed for now, but the intention is to provide a way to handle
errors in a global way.

Until then, you can use a `PipeSystem` to manually handle results.

---------

Signed-off-by: Jean Mertz <git@jeanmertz.com>
2025-02-11 22:15:43 +00:00
Periwink
d6725d3b1b
Expose method to update the internal ticks of Ref and Mut (#17716)
## What problem does this solve or what need does it fill?

There are some situations
(https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/13735) where the ticks that
are present inside `Ref` are incorrect, for example if `Ref` is created
outside of a `SystemParam`.
I still want to use `Ref` because it has convenient `is_added` and
`is_changed` methods.

My current solution is to build my own `Ref` by copy-pasting most the
bevy code to do that via something like
```rust
/// This method is necessary because there is no easy way to 
pub(crate) fn get_ref<C: Component>(
    world: &World,
    entity: Entity,
    last_run: Tick,
    this_run: Tick,
) -> Ref<C> {
    unsafe {
        let component_id = world
            .components()
            .get_id(TypeId::of::<C>())
            .unwrap_unchecked();
        let world = world.as_unsafe_world_cell_readonly();
        let entity_cell = world.get_entity(entity).unwrap_unchecked();
        get_component_and_ticks(
            world,
            component_id,
            C::STORAGE_TYPE,
            entity,
            entity_cell.location(),
        )
        .map(|(value, cells, _caller)| {
            Ref::new(
                value.deref::<C>(),
                cells.added.deref(),
                cells.changed.deref(),
                last_run,
                this_run,
                #[cfg(feature = "track_location")]
                _caller.deref(),
            )
        })
        .unwrap_unchecked()
    }
}

// Utility function to return
#[inline]
unsafe fn get_component_and_ticks(
    world: UnsafeWorldCell<'_>,
    component_id: ComponentId,
    storage_type: StorageType,
    entity: Entity,
    location: EntityLocation,
) -> Option<(Ptr<'_>, TickCells<'_>, MaybeUnsafeCellLocation<'_>)> {
    match storage_type {
        StorageType::Table => {
            let table = unsafe { world.storages().tables.get(location.table_id) }?;

            // SAFETY: archetypes only store valid table_rows and caller ensure aliasing rules
            Some((
                table.get_component(component_id, location.table_row)?,
                TickCells {
                    added: table
                        .get_added_tick(component_id, location.table_row)
                        .unwrap_unchecked(),
                    changed: table
                        .get_changed_tick(component_id, location.table_row)
                        .unwrap_unchecked(),
                },
                #[cfg(feature = "track_location")]
                table
                    .get_changed_by(component_id, location.table_row)
                    .unwrap_unchecked(),
                #[cfg(not(feature = "track_location"))]
                (),
            ))
        }
        StorageType::SparseSet => {
            let storage = unsafe { world.storages() }.sparse_sets.get(component_id)?;
            storage.get_with_ticks(entity)
        }
    }
}
```

It would be very convenient if instead bevy exposed a way to create a
`Ref` object with custom `last_run` and `this_run` ticks.
This PR does this by exposing a function to overwrite the `last_run` and
`this_run` ticks.
(Same with `Mut`)

I am ok with marking the method unsafe or risky if it's deemed to risky
for end-users.
2025-02-11 19:00:13 +00:00
Jean Mertz
fd67ca7eb0
feat(ecs): configurable error handling for fallible systems (#17753)
You can now configure error handlers for fallible systems. These can be
configured on several levels:

- Globally via `App::set_systems_error_handler`
- Per-schedule via `Schedule::set_error_handler`
- Per-system via a piped system (this is existing functionality)

The default handler of panicking on error keeps the same behavior as
before this commit.

The "fallible_systems" example demonstrates the new functionality.

This builds on top of #17731, #16589, #17051.

---------

Signed-off-by: Jean Mertz <git@jeanmertz.com>
2025-02-11 18:36:08 +00:00
Alice Cecile
fcc77fe3d6
Allow users to register their own disabling components / default query filters (#17768)
# Objective

Currently, default query filters, as added in #13120 / #17514 are
hardcoded to only use a single query filter.

This is limiting, as multiple distinct disabling components can serve
important distinct roles. I ran into this limitation when experimenting
with a workflow for prefabs, which don't represent the same state as "an
entity which is temporarily nonfunctional".

## Solution

1. Change `DefaultQueryFilters` to store a SmallVec of ComponentId,
rather than an Option.
2. Expose methods on `DefaultQueryFilters`, `World` and `App` to
actually configure this.
3. While we're here, improve the docs, write some tests, make use of
FromWorld and make some method names more descriptive.

## Follow-up

I'm not convinced that supporting sparse set disabling components is
useful, given the hit to iteration performance and runtime checks
incurred. That's disjoint from this PR though, so I'm not doing it here.
The existing warnings are fine for now.

## Testing

I've added both a doc test and an mid-level unit test to verify that
this works!
2025-02-11 18:25:32 +00:00
person93
575f66504b
Silence deprecation warning in Bundle derive macro (#17369) (#17790)
# Objective

- Fixes #17369

## Solution

- Add `#[allow(deprecated)]` to the generated code.
2025-02-11 00:56:09 +00:00
Chris Russell
c34a2c2fba
Query::get_many should not check for duplicates (#17724)
# Objective

Restore the behavior of `Query::get_many` prior to #15858.  

When passed duplicate `Entity`s, `get_many` is supposed to return
results for all of them, since read-only queries don't alias. However,
#15858 merged the implementation with `get_many_mut` and caused it to
return `QueryEntityError::AliasedMutability`.

## Solution

Introduce a new `Query::get_many_readonly` method that consumes the
`Query` like `get_many_inner`, but that is constrained to `D:
ReadOnlyQueryData` so that it can skip the aliasing check. Implement
`Query::get_many` in terms of that new method. Add a test, and a comment
explaining why it doesn't match the pattern of the other `&self`
methods.
2025-02-10 22:07:15 +00:00
urben1680
7f9588d4c6
Fix documentation of Entities::get (#17721)
This method returns `None` if `meta.location.archetype_id` is
`ArchetypeId::INVALID`.
`EntityLocation::INVALID.archetype_id` is `ArchetypeId::INVALID`.
Therefore this method cannot return `Some(EntityLocation::INVALID)`.
Linking to it in the docs is futile anyway as that constant is not
public.
2025-02-10 22:05:05 +00:00
Chris Russell
eee7fd5b3e
Encapsulate cfg(feature = "track_location") in a type. (#17602)
# Objective

Eliminate the need to write `cfg(feature = "track_location")` every time
one uses an API that may use location tracking. It's verbose, and a
little intimidating. And it requires code outside of `bevy_ecs` that
wants to use location tracking needs to either unconditionally enable
the feature, or include conditional compilation of its own. It would be
good for users to be able to log locations when they are available
without needing to add feature flags to their own crates.

Reduce the number of cases where code compiles with the `track_location`
feature enabled, but not with it disabled, or vice versa. It can be hard
to remember to test it both ways!

Remove the need to store a `None` in `HookContext` when the
`track_location` feature is disabled.

## Solution

Create an `MaybeLocation<T>` type that contains a `T` if the
`track_location` feature is enabled, and is a ZST if it is not. The
overall API is similar to `Option`, but whether the value is `Some` or
`None` is set at compile time and is the same for all values.

Default `T` to `&'static Location<'static>`, since that is the most
common case.

Remove all `cfg(feature = "track_location")` blocks outside of the
implementation of that type, and instead call methods on it.

When `track_location` is disabled, `MaybeLocation` is a ZST and all
methods are `#[inline]` and empty, so they should be entirely removed by
the compiler. But the code will still be visible to the compiler and
checked, so if it compiles with the feature disabled then it should also
compile with it enabled, and vice versa.

## Open Questions

Where should these types live? I put them in `change_detection` because
that's where the existing `MaybeLocation` types were, but we now use
these outside of change detection.

While I believe that the compiler should be able to remove all of these
calls, I have not actually tested anything. If we want to take this
approach, what testing is required to ensure it doesn't impact
performance?

## Migration Guide

Methods like `Ref::changed_by()` that return a `&'static
Location<'static>` will now be available even when the `track_location`
feature is disabled, but they will return a new `MaybeLocation` type.
`MaybeLocation` wraps a `&'static Location<'static>` when the feature is
enabled, and is a ZST when the feature is disabled.

Existing code that needs a `&Location` can call `into_option().unwrap()`
to recover it. Many trait impls are forwarded, so if you only need
`Display` then no changes will be necessary.

If that code was conditionally compiled, you may instead want to use the
methods on `MaybeLocation` to remove the need for conditional
compilation.

Code that constructs a `Ref`, `Mut`, `Res`, or `ResMut` will now need to
provide location information unconditionally. If you are creating them
from existing Bevy types, you can obtain a `MaybeLocation` from methods
like `Table::get_changed_by_slice_for()` or
`ComponentSparseSet::get_with_ticks`. Otherwise, you will need to store
a `MaybeLocation` next to your data and use methods like `as_ref()` or
`as_mut()` to obtain wrapped references.
2025-02-10 21:21:20 +00:00
Carter Anderson
ea578415e1
Improved Spawn APIs and Bundle Effects (#17521)
## Objective

A major critique of Bevy at the moment is how boilerplatey it is to
compose (and read) entity hierarchies:

```rust
commands
    .spawn(Foo)
    .with_children(|p| {
        p.spawn(Bar).with_children(|p| {
            p.spawn(Baz);
        });
        p.spawn(Bar).with_children(|p| {
            p.spawn(Baz);
        });
    });
```

There is also currently no good way to statically define and return an
entity hierarchy from a function. Instead, people often do this
"internally" with a Commands function that returns nothing, making it
impossible to spawn the hierarchy in other cases (direct World spawns,
ChildSpawner, etc).

Additionally, because this style of API results in creating the
hierarchy bits _after_ the initial spawn of a bundle, it causes ECS
archetype changes (and often expensive table moves).

Because children are initialized after the fact, we also can't count
them to pre-allocate space. This means each time a child inserts itself,
it has a high chance of overflowing the currently allocated capacity in
the `RelationshipTarget` collection, causing literal worst-case
reallocations.

We can do better!

## Solution

The Bundle trait has been extended to support an optional
`BundleEffect`. This is applied directly to World immediately _after_
the Bundle has fully inserted. Note that this is
[intentionally](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/16920)
_not done via a deferred Command_, which would require repeatedly
copying each remaining subtree of the hierarchy to a new command as we
walk down the tree (_not_ good performance).

This allows us to implement the new `SpawnRelated` trait for all
`RelationshipTarget` impls, which looks like this in practice:

```rust
world.spawn((
    Foo,
    Children::spawn((
        Spawn((
            Bar,
            Children::spawn(Spawn(Baz)),
        )),
        Spawn((
            Bar,
            Children::spawn(Spawn(Baz)),
        )),
    ))
))
```

`Children::spawn` returns `SpawnRelatedBundle<Children, L:
SpawnableList>`, which is a `Bundle` that inserts `Children`
(preallocated to the size of the `SpawnableList::size_hint()`).
`Spawn<B: Bundle>(pub B)` implements `SpawnableList` with a size of 1.
`SpawnableList` is also implemented for tuples of `SpawnableList` (same
general pattern as the Bundle impl).

There are currently three built-in `SpawnableList` implementations:

```rust
world.spawn((
    Foo,
    Children::spawn((
        Spawn(Name::new("Child1")),   
        SpawnIter(["Child2", "Child3"].into_iter().map(Name::new),
        SpawnWith(|parent: &mut ChildSpawner| {
            parent.spawn(Name::new("Child4"));
            parent.spawn(Name::new("Child5"));
        })
    )),
))
```

We get the benefits of "structured init", but we have nice flexibility
where it is required!

Some readers' first instinct might be to try to remove the need for the
`Spawn` wrapper. This is impossible in the Rust type system, as a tuple
of "child Bundles to be spawned" and a "tuple of Components to be added
via a single Bundle" is ambiguous in the Rust type system. There are two
ways to resolve that ambiguity:

1. By adding support for variadics to the Rust type system (removing the
need for nested bundles). This is out of scope for this PR :)
2. Using wrapper types to resolve the ambiguity (this is what I did in
this PR).

For the single-entity spawn cases, `Children::spawn_one` does also
exist, which removes the need for the wrapper:

```rust
world.spawn((
    Foo,
    Children::spawn_one(Bar),
))
```

## This works for all Relationships

This API isn't just for `Children` / `ChildOf` relationships. It works
for any relationship type, and they can be mixed and matched!

```rust
world.spawn((
    Foo,
    Observers::spawn((
        Spawn(Observer::new(|trigger: Trigger<FuseLit>| {})),
        Spawn(Observer::new(|trigger: Trigger<Exploded>| {})),
    )),
    OwnerOf::spawn(Spawn(Bar))
    Children::spawn(Spawn(Baz))
))
```

## Macros

While `Spawn` is necessary to satisfy the type system, we _can_ remove
the need to express it via macros. The example above can be expressed
more succinctly using the new `children![X]` macro, which internally
produces `Children::spawn(Spawn(X))`:

```rust
world.spawn((
    Foo,
    children![
        (
            Bar,
            children![Baz],
        ),
        (
            Bar,
            children![Baz],
        ),
    ]
))
```

There is also a `related!` macro, which is a generic version of the
`children!` macro that supports any relationship type:

```rust
world.spawn((
    Foo,
    related!(Children[
        (
            Bar,
            related!(Children[Baz]),
        ),
        (
            Bar,
            related!(Children[Baz]),
        ),
    ])
))
```

## Returning Hierarchies from Functions

Thanks to these changes, the following pattern is now possible:

```rust
fn button(text: &str, color: Color) -> impl Bundle {
    (
        Node {
            width: Val::Px(300.),
            height: Val::Px(100.),
            ..default()
        },
        BackgroundColor(color),
        children![
            Text::new(text),
        ]
    )
}

fn ui() -> impl Bundle {
    (
        Node {
            width: Val::Percent(100.0),
            height: Val::Percent(100.0),
            ..default(),
        },
        children![
            button("hello", BLUE),
            button("world", RED),
        ]
    )
}

// spawn from a system
fn system(mut commands: Commands) {
    commands.spawn(ui());
}

// spawn directly on World
world.spawn(ui());
```

## Additional Changes and Notes

* `Bundle::from_components` has been split out into
`BundleFromComponents::from_components`, enabling us to implement
`Bundle` for types that cannot be "taken" from the ECS (such as the new
`SpawnRelatedBundle`).
* The `NoBundleEffect` trait (which implements `BundleEffect`) is
implemented for empty tuples (and tuples of empty tuples), which allows
us to constrain APIs to only accept bundles that do not have effects.
This is critical because the current batch spawn APIs cannot efficiently
apply BundleEffects in their current form (as doing so in-place could
invalidate the cached raw pointers). We could consider allocating a
buffer of the effects to be applied later, but that does have
performance implications that could offset the balance and value of the
batched APIs (and would likely require some refactors to the underlying
code). I've decided to be conservative here. We can consider relaxing
that requirement on those APIs later, but that should be done in a
followup imo.
* I've ported a few examples to illustrate real-world usage. I think in
a followup we should port all examples to the `children!` form whenever
possible (and for cases that require things like SpawnIter, use the raw
APIs).
* Some may ask "why not use the `Relationship` to spawn (ex:
`ChildOf::spawn(Foo)`) instead of the `RelationshipTarget` (ex:
`Children::spawn(Spawn(Foo))`)?". That _would_ allow us to remove the
`Spawn` wrapper. I've explicitly chosen to disallow this pattern.
`Bundle::Effect` has the ability to create _significant_ weirdness.
Things in `Bundle` position look like components. For example
`world.spawn((Foo, ChildOf::spawn(Bar)))` _looks and reads_ like Foo is
a child of Bar. `ChildOf` is in Foo's "component position" but it is not
a component on Foo. This is a huge problem. Now that `Bundle::Effect`
exists, we should be _very_ principled about keeping the "weird and
unintuitive behavior" to a minimum. Things that read like components
_should be the components they appear to be".

## Remaining Work

* The macros are currently trivially implemented using macro_rules and
are currently limited to the max tuple length. They will require a
proc_macro implementation to work around the tuple length limit.

## Next Steps

* Port the remaining examples to use `children!` where possible and raw
`Spawn` / `SpawnIter` / `SpawnWith` where the flexibility of the raw API
is required.

## Migration Guide

Existing spawn patterns will continue to work as expected.

Manual Bundle implementations now require a `BundleEffect` associated
type. Exisiting bundles would have no bundle effect, so use `()`.
Additionally `Bundle::from_components` has been moved to the new
`BundleFromComponents` trait.

```rust
// Before
unsafe impl Bundle for X {
    unsafe fn from_components<T, F>(ctx: &mut T, func: &mut F) -> Self {
    }
    /* remaining bundle impl here */
}

// After
unsafe impl Bundle for X {
    type Effect = ();
    /* remaining bundle impl here */
}

unsafe impl BundleFromComponents for X {
    unsafe fn from_components<T, F>(ctx: &mut T, func: &mut F) -> Self {
    }
}
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Emerson Coskey <emerson@coskey.dev>
2025-02-09 23:32:56 +00:00
newclarityex
c679b861d8
adds example for local defaults (#17751)
# Objective
Solves https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17747.

## Solution

- Adds an example for creating a default value for Local.

## Testing

- Example code compiles and passes assertions.
2025-02-09 22:02:35 +00:00
raldone01
1b7db895b7
Harden proc macro path resolution and add integration tests. (#17330)
This pr uses the `extern crate self as` trick to make proc macros behave
the same way inside and outside bevy.

# Objective

- Removes noise introduced by `crate as` in the whole bevy repo.
- Fixes #17004.
- Hardens proc macro path resolution.

## TODO

- [x] `BevyManifest` needs cleanup.
- [x] Cleanup remaining `crate as`.
- [x] Add proper integration tests to the ci.

## Notes

- `cargo-manifest-proc-macros` is written by me and based/inspired by
the old `BevyManifest` implementation and
[`bkchr/proc-macro-crate`](https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate).
- What do you think about the new integration test machinery I added to
the `ci`?
  More and better integration tests can be added at a later stage.
The goal of these integration tests is to simulate an actual separate
crate that uses bevy. Ideally they would lightly touch all bevy crates.

## Testing

- Needs RA test
- Needs testing from other users
- Others need to run at least `cargo run -p ci integration-test` and
verify that they work.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-02-09 19:45:45 +00:00
François Mockers
7400e7adfd
Cleanup publish process (#17728)
# Objective

- publish script copy the license files to all subcrates, meaning that
all publish are dirty. this breaks git verification of crates
- the order and list of crates to publish is manually maintained,
leading to error. cargo 1.84 is more strict and the list is currently
wrong

## Solution

- duplicate all the licenses to all crates and remove the
`--allow-dirty` flag
- instead of a manual list of crates, get it from `cargo package
--workspace`
- remove the `--no-verify` flag to... verify more things?
2025-02-09 17:46:19 +00:00
Carter Anderson
3c8fae2390
Improved Entity Mapping and Cloning (#17687)
Fixes #17535

Bevy's approach to handling "entity mapping" during spawning and cloning
needs some work. The addition of
[Relations](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/17398) both
[introduced a new "duplicate entities" bug when spawning scenes in the
scene system](#17535) and made the weaknesses of the current mapping
system exceedingly clear:

1. Entity mapping requires _a ton_ of boilerplate (implement or derive
VisitEntities and VisitEntitesMut, then register / reflect MapEntities).
Knowing the incantation is challenging and if you forget to do it in
part or in whole, spawning subtly breaks.
2. Entity mapping a spawned component in scenes incurs unnecessary
overhead: look up ReflectMapEntities, create a _brand new temporary
instance_ of the component using FromReflect, map the entities in that
instance, and then apply that on top of the actual component using
reflection. We can do much better.

Additionally, while our new [Entity cloning
system](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/16132) is already pretty
great, it has some areas we can make better:

* It doesn't expose semantic info about the clone (ex: ignore or "clone
empty"), meaning we can't key off of that in places where it would be
useful, such as scene spawning. Rather than duplicating this info across
contexts, I think it makes more sense to add that info to the clone
system, especially given that we'd like to use cloning code in some of
our spawning scenarios.
* EntityCloner is currently built in a way that prioritizes a single
entity clone
* EntityCloner's recursive cloning is built to be done "inside out" in a
parallel context (queue commands that each have a clone of
EntityCloner). By making EntityCloner the orchestrator of the clone we
can remove internal arcs, improve the clarity of the code, make
EntityCloner mutable again, and simplify the builder code.
* EntityCloner does not currently take into account entity mapping. This
is necessary to do true "bullet proof" cloning, would allow us to unify
the per-component scene spawning and cloning UX, and ultimately would
allow us to use EntityCloner in place of raw reflection for scenes like
`Scene(World)` (which would give us a nice performance boost: fewer
archetype moves, less reflection overhead).

## Solution

### Improved Entity Mapping

First, components now have first-class "entity visiting and mapping"
behavior:

```rust
#[derive(Component, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct Inventory {
    size: usize,
    #[entities]
    items: Vec<Entity>,
}
```

Any field with the `#[entities]` annotation will be viewable and
mappable when cloning and spawning scenes.

Compare that to what was required before!

```rust
#[derive(Component, Reflect, VisitEntities, VisitEntitiesMut)]
#[reflect(Component, MapEntities)]
struct Inventory {
    #[visit_entities(ignore)]
    size: usize,
    items: Vec<Entity>,
}
```

Additionally, for relationships `#[entities]` is implied, meaning this
"just works" in scenes and cloning:

```rust
#[derive(Component, Reflect)]
#[relationship(relationship_target = Children)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct ChildOf(pub Entity);
```

Note that Component _does not_ implement `VisitEntities` directly.
Instead, it has `Component::visit_entities` and
`Component::visit_entities_mut` methods. This is for a few reasons:

1. We cannot implement `VisitEntities for C: Component` because that
would conflict with our impl of VisitEntities for anything that
implements `IntoIterator<Item=Entity>`. Preserving that impl is more
important from a UX perspective.
2. We should not implement `Component: VisitEntities` VisitEntities in
the Component derive, as that would increase the burden of manual
Component trait implementors.
3. Making VisitEntitiesMut directly callable for components would make
it easy to invalidate invariants defined by a component author. By
putting it in the `Component` impl, we can make it harder to call
naturally / unavailable to autocomplete using `fn
visit_entities_mut(this: &mut Self, ...)`.

`ReflectComponent::apply_or_insert` is now
`ReflectComponent::apply_or_insert_mapped`. By moving mapping inside
this impl, we remove the need to go through the reflection system to do
entity mapping, meaning we no longer need to create a clone of the
target component, map the entities in that component, and patch those
values on top. This will make spawning mapped entities _much_ faster
(The default `Component::visit_entities_mut` impl is an inlined empty
function, so it will incur no overhead for unmapped entities).

### The Bug Fix

To solve #17535, spawning code now skips entities with the new
`ComponentCloneBehavior::Ignore` and
`ComponentCloneBehavior::RelationshipTarget` variants (note
RelationshipTarget is a temporary "workaround" variant that allows
scenes to skip these components. This is a temporary workaround that can
be removed as these cases should _really_ be using EntityCloner logic,
which should be done in a followup PR. When that is done,
`ComponentCloneBehavior::RelationshipTarget` can be merged into the
normal `ComponentCloneBehavior::Custom`).

### Improved Cloning

* `Option<ComponentCloneHandler>` has been replaced by
`ComponentCloneBehavior`, which encodes additional intent and context
(ex: `Default`, `Ignore`, `Custom`, `RelationshipTarget` (this last one
is temporary)).
* Global per-world entity cloning configuration has been removed. This
felt overly complicated, increased our API surface, and felt too
generic. Each clone context can have different requirements (ex: what a
user wants in a specific system, what a scene spawner wants, etc). I'd
prefer to see how far context-specific EntityCloners get us first.
* EntityCloner's internals have been reworked to remove Arcs and make it
mutable.
* EntityCloner is now directly stored on EntityClonerBuilder,
simplifying the code somewhat
* EntityCloner's "bundle scratch" pattern has been moved into the new
BundleScratch type, improving its usability and making it usable in
other contexts (such as future cross-world cloning code). Currently this
is still private, but with some higher level safe APIs it could be used
externally for making dynamic bundles
* EntityCloner's recursive cloning behavior has been "externalized". It
is now responsible for orchestrating recursive clones, meaning it no
longer needs to be sharable/clone-able across threads / read-only.
* EntityCloner now does entity mapping during clones, like scenes do.
This gives behavior parity and also makes it more generically useful.
* `RelatonshipTarget::RECURSIVE_SPAWN` is now
`RelationshipTarget::LINKED_SPAWN`, and this field is used when cloning
relationship targets to determine if cloning should happen recursively.
The new `LINKED_SPAWN` term was picked to make it more generically
applicable across spawning and cloning scenarios.

## Next Steps

* I think we should adapt EntityCloner to support cross world cloning. I
think this PR helps set the stage for that by making the internals
slightly more generalized. We could have a CrossWorldEntityCloner that
reuses a lot of this infrastructure.
* Once we support cross world cloning, we should use EntityCloner to
spawn `Scene(World)` scenes. This would yield significant performance
benefits (no archetype moves, less reflection overhead).

---------

Co-authored-by: eugineerd <70062110+eugineerd@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-02-06 22:13:41 +00:00
Zhixing Zhang
f2a65c2dd3
Schedule build pass (#11094)
# Objective

This is a follow up to #9822, which automatically adds sync points
during the Schedule build process.

However, the implementation in #9822 feels very "special case" to me. As
the number of things we want to do with the `Schedule` grows, we need a
modularized way to manage those behaviors. For example, in one of my
current experiments I want to automatically add systems to apply GPU
pipeline barriers between systems accessing GPU resources.

For dynamic modifications of the schedule, we mostly need these
capabilities:
- Storing custom data on schedule edges
- Storing custom data on schedule nodes
- Modify the schedule graph whenever it builds

These should be enough to allows us to add "hooks" to the schedule build
process for various reasons.

cc @hymm 

## Solution
This PR abstracts the process of schedule modification and created a new
trait, `ScheduleBuildPass`. Most of the logics in #9822 were moved to an
implementation of `ScheduleBuildPass`, `AutoInsertApplyDeferredPass`.

Whether a dependency edge should "ignore deferred" is now indicated by
the presence of a marker struct, `IgnoreDeferred`.

This PR has no externally visible effects. However, in a future PR I
propose to change the `before_ignore_deferred` and
`after_ignore_deferred` API into a more general form,
`before_with_options` and `after_with_options`.

```rs
schedule.add_systems(
    system.before_with_options(another_system, IgnoreDeferred)
);

schedule.add_systems(
    system.before_with_options(another_system, (
        IgnoreDeferred,
        AnyOtherOption {
            key: value
        }
    ))
);

schedule.add_systems(
    system.before_with_options(another_system, ())
);
```
2025-02-05 23:14:05 +00:00
Rob Grindeland
0335f34561
Add missing return in default Relationship::on_insert impl (#17675)
# Objective

There was a bug in the default `Relationship::on_insert` implementation
that caused it to not properly handle entities targeting themselves in
relationships. The relationship component was properly removed, but it
would go on to add itself to its own target component.

## Solution

Added a missing `return` and a couple of tests
(`self_relationship_fails` failed on its second assert prior to this
PR).

## Testing

See above.
2025-02-05 21:26:16 +00:00
ElliottjPierce
1b2cf7d6cd
Isolate component registration (#17671)
# Objective

Progresses #17569. The end goal here is to synchronize component
registration. See the other PR for details for the motivation behind
that.

For this PR specifically, the objective is to decouple `Components` from
`Storages`. What components are registered etc should have nothing to do
with what Storages looks like. Storages should only care about what
entity archetypes have been spawned.

## Solution

Previously, this was used to create sparse sets for relevant components
when those components were registered. Now, we do that when the
component is inserted/spawned.

This PR proposes doing that in `BundleInfo::new`, but there may be a
better place.

## Testing

In theory, this shouldn't have changed any functionality, so no new
tests were created. I'm not aware of any examples that make heavy use of
sparse set components either.

## Migration Guide

- Remove storages from functions where it is no longer needed.
- Note that SparseSets are no longer present for all registered sparse
set components, only those that have been spawned.

---------

Co-authored-by: SpecificProtagonist <vincentjunge@posteo.net>
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-02-05 19:59:30 +00:00
Zachary Harrold
d0c0bad7b4
Split Component::register_component_hooks into individual methods (#17685)
# Objective

- Fixes #17411

## Solution

- Deprecated `Component::register_component_hooks`
- Added individual methods for each hook which return `None` if the hook
is unused.

## Testing

- CI

---

## Migration Guide

`Component::register_component_hooks` is now deprecated and will be
removed in a future release. When implementing `Component` manually,
also implement the respective hook methods on `Component`.

```rust
// Before
impl Component for Foo {
    // snip
    fn register_component_hooks(hooks: &mut ComponentHooks) {
            hooks.on_add(foo_on_add);
    }
}

// After
impl Component for Foo {
    // snip
    fn on_add() -> Option<ComponentHook> {
            Some(foo_on_add)
    }
}
```

## Notes

I've chosen to deprecate `Component::register_component_hooks` rather
than outright remove it to ease the migration guide. While it is in a
state of deprecation, it must be used by
`Components::register_component_internal` to ensure users who haven't
migrated to the new hook definition scheme aren't left behind. For users
of the new scheme, a default implementation of
`Component::register_component_hooks` is provided which forwards the new
individual hook implementations.

Personally, I think this is a cleaner API to work with, and would allow
the documentation for hooks to exist on the respective `Component`
methods (e.g., documentation for `OnAdd` can exist on
`Component::on_add`). Ideally, `Component::on_add` would be the hook
itself rather than a getter for the hook, but it is the only way to
early-out for a no-op hook, which is important for performance.

## Migration Guide

`Component::register_component_hooks` has been deprecated. If you are
manually implementing the `Component` trait and registering hooks there,
use the individual methods such as `on_add` instead for increased
clarity.
2025-02-05 19:33:05 +00:00
couyit
03af547c28
Move Item and fetch to QueryData from WorldQuery (#17679)
# Objective

Fixes #17662

## Solution

Moved `Item` and `fetch` from `WorldQuery` to `QueryData`, and adjusted
their implementations accordingly.

Currently, documentation related to `fetch` is written under
`WorldQuery`. It would be more appropriate to move it to the `QueryData`
documentation for clarity.

I am not very experienced with making contributions. If there are any
mistakes or areas for improvement, I would appreciate any suggestions
you may have.

## Migration Guide

The `WorldQuery::Item` type and `WorldQuery::fetch` method have been
moved to `QueryData`, as they were not useful for `QueryFilter` types.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-02-05 18:46:18 +00:00
Chris Russell
6f39e44c48
Introduce methods on QueryState to obtain a Query (#15858)
# Objective

Simplify and expand the API for `QueryState`.  

`QueryState` has a lot of methods that mirror those on `Query`. These
are then multiplied by variants that take `&World`, `&mut World`, and
`UnsafeWorldCell`. In addition, many of them have `_manual` variants
that take `&QueryState` and avoid calling `update_archetypes()`. Not all
of the combinations exist, however, so some operations are not possible.

## Solution

Introduce methods to get a `Query` from a `QueryState`. That will reduce
duplication between the types, and ensure that the full `Query` API is
always available for `QueryState`.

Introduce methods on `Query` that consume the query to return types with
the full `'w` lifetime. This avoids issues with borrowing where things
like `query_state.query(&world).get(entity)` don't work because they
borrow from the temporary `Query`.

Finally, implement `Copy` for read-only `Query`s. `get_inner` and
`iter_inner` currently take `&self`, so changing them to consume `self`
would be a breaking change. By making `Query: Copy`, they can consume a
copy of `self` and continue to work.

The consuming methods also let us simplify the implementation of methods
on `Query`, by doing `fn foo(&self) { self.as_readonly().foo_inner() }`
and `fn foo_mut(&mut self) { self.reborrow().foo_inner() }`. That
structure makes it more difficult to accidentally extend lifetimes,
since the safe `as_readonly()` and `reborrow()` methods shrink them
appropriately. The optimizer is able to see that they are both identity
functions and inline them, so there should be no performance cost.

Note that this change would conflict with #15848. If `QueryState` is
stored as a `Cow`, then the consuming methods cannot be implemented, and
`Copy` cannot be implemented.

## Future Work

The next step is to mark the methods on `QueryState` as `#[deprecated]`,
and move the implementations into `Query`.

## Migration Guide

`Query::to_readonly` has been renamed to `Query::as_readonly`.
2025-02-05 18:33:15 +00:00
Vic
be9b38e372
implement UniqueEntitySlice (#17589)
# Objective

Follow-up to #17549 and #16547.

A large part of `Vec`s usefulness is behind its ability to be sliced,
like sorting f.e., so we want the same to be possible for
`UniqueEntityVec`.

## Solution

Add a `UniqueEntitySlice` type. It is a wrapper around `[T]`, and itself
a DST.

Because `mem::swap` has a `Sized` bound, DSTs cannot be swapped, and we
can freely hand out mutable subslices without worrying about the
uniqueness invariant of the backing collection!
`UniqueEntityVec` and the relevant `UniqueEntityIter`s now have methods
and trait impls that return `UniqueEntitySlice`s.
`UniqueEntitySlice` itself can deref into normal slices, which means we
can avoid implementing the vast majority of immutable slice methods.

Most of the remaining methods:
- split a slice/collection in further unique subsections/slices
- reorder the slice: `sort`, `rotate_*`, `swap`
- construct/deconstruct/convert pointer-like types: `Box`, `Arc`, `Rc`,
`Cow`
- are comparison trait impls

As this PR is already larger than I'd like, we leave several things to
follow-ups:
- `UniqueEntityArray` and the related slice methods that would return it
    - denoted by "chunk", "array_*" for iterators
- Methods that return iterators with `UniqueEntitySlice` as their item 
    - `windows`, `chunks` and `split` families
- All methods that are capable of actively mutating individual elements.
While they could be offered unsafely, subslicing makes their safety
contract weird enough to warrant its own discussion.
- `fill_with`, `swap_with_slice`, `iter_mut`, `split_first/last_mut`,
`select_nth_unstable_*`

Note that `Arc`, `Rc` and `Cow` are not fundamental types, so even if
they contain `UniqueEntitySlice`, we cannot write direct trait impls for
them.
On top of that, `Cow` is not a receiver (like `self: Arc<Self>` is) so
we cannot write inherent methods for it either.
2025-02-05 18:10:56 +00:00
Alice Cecile
0ca9d6968a
Improve docs for WorldQuery (#17654)
# Objective

While working on #17649, I found the docs for `WorldQuery` and the
related traits frustratingly vague.

## Solution

Clarify them and add some more tangible advice.

Also fix a copy-pasted typo in related comments.

---------

Co-authored-by: James O'Brien <james.obrien@drafly.net>
2025-02-03 22:13:42 +00:00
Mincong Lu
29d0ef6f3a
Added try_map_unchanged. (#17653)
# Objective

Allow mapping `Mut` to another value while returning a custom error on
failure.

## Solution

Added `try_map_unchanged` to `Mut` which returns a `Result` instead of
`Option` .
2025-02-03 22:03:39 +00:00
Chris Russell
2d66099f3d
Fix access checks for DeferredWorld as SystemParam. (#17616)
# Objective

Prevent unsound uses of `DeferredWorld` as a `SystemParam`. It is
currently unsound because it does not check for existing access, and
because it incorrectly registers filtered access.

## Solution

Have `DeferredWorld` panic if a previous parameter has conflicting
access.

Have `DeferredWorld` update `archetype_component_access` so that the
multi-threaded executor sees the access.

Fix `FilteredAccessSet::read_all()` and `write_all()` to correctly add a
`FilteredAccess` with no filter so that `Query` is able to detect the
conflicts.

Remove redundant `read_all()` call, since `write_all()` already declares
read access.

Remove unnecessary `set_has_deferred()` call, since `<DeferredWorld as
SystemParam>::apply_deferred()` does nothing. Previously we were
inserting unnecessary `apply_deferred` systems in the schedule.

## Testing

Added unit tests for systems where `DeferredWorld` conflicts with a
`Query` in the same system.
2025-02-03 21:58:07 +00:00
Joseph
721bb91987
Add basic debug checks for read-only UnsafeWorldCell (#17393)
# Objective

The method `World::as_unsafe_world_cell_readonly` is used to create an
`UnsafeWorldCell` which is only allowed to access world data immutably.
This can be tricky to use, as the data that an `UnsafeWorldCell` is
allowed to access exists only in documentation (you could think of it as
a "doc-time abstraction" rather than a "compile-time" abstraction). It's
quite easy to forget where a particular instance came from and attempt
to use it for mutable access, leading to instant, silent undefined
behavior.

## Solution

Add a debug-mode only flag to `UnsafeWorldCell` which tracks whether or
not the instance can be used to access world data mutably. This should
catch basic improper usages of `as_unsafe_world_cell_readonly`.

## Future work

There are a few ways that you can bypass the runtime checks introduced
by this PR:

* Any world accesses done via `UnsafeWorldCell::storages` are completely
invisible to these runtime checks. Unfortunately, `storages` constitutes
most of the world accesses used in the engine itself, so this PR will
mostly benefit downstream users of bevy.
* It's possible to call `get_resource_by_id`, and then convert the
returned `Ptr` to a `PtrMut` by calling `assert_unique`. In the future
we'll probably want to add a debug-mode only flag to `Ptr` which tracks
whether or not it can be upgraded to a `PtrMut`. I didn't include this
change in this PR as those types are currently defined using macros
which makes it a bit tricky to modify their definitions.
* Any data accesses done through a mutable `UnsafeWorldCell` are
completely unchecked, meaning it's possible to unsoundly create multiple
mutable references to a single component, for example. In the future we
may want to store an `Access<>` set inside of the world's `Storages` to
add granular debug-mode runtime checks.

That said, I'd consider this PR to be a good first step towards adding
full runtime checks to `UnsafeWorldCell`.

## Testing

Added a few tests that basic invalid mutable world access result in a
panic.

---------

Co-authored-by: Joseph <21144246+JoJoJet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice I Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-02-03 21:46:39 +00:00
Alice Cecile
da5064889a
Add required serde_derive feature flag to bevy_ecs (#17651)
# Objective

```
cargo test --package bevy_ecs --lib --all-features
```

fails to compile, with output like

> error[E0433]: failed to resolve: could not find `Serialize` in `serde`
>    --> crates/bevy_ecs/src/entity/index_set.rs:14:69
>     |
> 14 | #[cfg_attr(feature = "serialize", derive(serde::Deserialize,
serde::Serialize))]
> | ^^^^^^^^^ could not find `Serialize` in `serde`
>     |
> note: found an item that was configured out
> -->
/home/alice/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/serde-1.0.217/src/lib.rs:343:37
>     |
> 343 | pub use serde_derive::{Deserialize, Serialize};
>     |                                     ^^^^^^^^^
> note: the item is gated behind the `serde_derive` feature
> -->
/home/alice/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/serde-1.0.217/src/lib.rs:341:7
>     |
> 341 | #[cfg(feature = "serde_derive")]
>     |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


## Solution

Add the required feature flags and get bevy_ecs compiling standalone
corrctly.

## Testing

The command above now compiles succesfully. Note that several system
stepping tests are failing, and were not being tested in CI. That's a
different PR's problem though.
2025-02-03 03:19:57 +00:00
NiseVoid
62285a47ba
Add simple Disabled marker (#17514)
# Objective

We have default query filters now, but there is no first-party marker
for entity disabling yet
Fixes #17458

## Solution

Add the marker, cool recursive features and/or potential hook changes
should be follow up work

## Testing

Added a unit test to check that the new marker is enabled by default
2025-02-02 21:42:25 +00:00
Periwink
75e8e8c0f6
Expose ObserverDescriptor fields (#17623)
# Objective

Expose accessor functions to the `ObserverDescriptor`, so that users can
use the `Observer` component to inspect what the observer is watching.
This would be useful for me, I don't think there's any reason to hide
these.
2025-02-02 20:10:37 +00:00
Joona Aalto
9165fb020a
Implement Serialize/Deserialize for entity collections (#17620)
# Objective

Follow-up to #17615.

Bevy's entity collection types like `EntityHashSet` no longer implement
serde's `Serialize` and `Deserialize` after becoming newtypes instead of
type aliases in #16912. This broke some types that support serde for me
in Avian.

I also missed creating const constructors for `EntityIndexMap` and
`EntityIndexSet` in #17615. Oops!

## Solution

Implement `Serialize` and `Deserialize` for Bevy's entity collection
types, and add const constructors for `EntityIndexMap` and
`EntityIndexSet`.

I didn't implement `ReflectSerialize` or `ReflectDeserialize` here,
because I had some trouble fixing the resulting errors, and they were
not implemented previously either.
2025-02-02 15:42:36 +00:00
ElliottjPierce
361397fcac
Add a test for direct recursion in required components. (#17626)
I realized there wasn't a test for this yet and figured it would be
trivial to add. Why not? Unless there was a test for this, and I just
missed it?

I appreciate the unique error message it gives and wanted to make sure
it doesn't get broken at some point. Or worse, endlessly recurse.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
2025-02-02 06:47:10 +00:00
Joona Aalto
59697f9ccc
Make EntityHashMap::new and EntityHashSet::new const (#17615)
# Objective

#16912 turned `EntityHashMap` and `EntityHashSet` into proper newtypes
instead of type aliases. However, this removed the ability to create
these collections in const contexts; previously, you could use
`EntityHashSet::with_hasher(EntityHash)`, but it doesn't exist anymore.

## Solution

Make `EntityHashMap::new` and `EntityHashSet::new` const methods.
2025-01-30 17:40:06 +00:00
Chris Russell
7d68ac029e
Use the provided caller instead of Location::caller() in despawn_with_caller() (#17598)
# Objective

Pass the correct location to triggers when despawning entities.
`EntityWorldMut::despawn_with_caller()` currently passes
`Location::caller()` to some triggers instead of the `caller` parameter
it was passed. As `despawn_with_caller()` is not `#[track_caller]`, this
means the location will always be reported as `despawn_with_caller()`
itself.

## Solution

Pass `caller` instead of `Location::caller()`.
2025-01-30 04:50:17 +00:00
Jean Mertz
b58eda01e2
feat(ecs): add EntityEntryCommands::entity() method chaining (#17580)
This allows you to continue chaining method calls after calling
`EntityCommands::entry`:

```rust
commands
    .entity(player.entity)
    .entry::<Level>()
    // Modify the component if it exists
    .and_modify(|mut lvl| lvl.0 += 1)
    // Otherwise insert a default value
    .or_insert(Level(0))
    // Return the EntityCommands for the entity
    .entity()
    // And continue chaining method calls
    .insert(Name::new("Player"));
```

---------

Signed-off-by: Jean Mertz <git@jeanmertz.com>
2025-01-29 17:36:02 +00:00
Vic
b039bf6768
implement UniqueEntityVec (#17549)
# Objective

In #16547, we added `EntitySet`s/`EntitySetIterator`s. We can know
whenever an iterator only contains unique entities, however we do not
yet have the ability to collect and reuse these without either the
unsafe `UniqueEntityIter::from_iterator_unchecked`, or the expensive
`HashSet::from_iter`.
An important piece for being able to do this is a `Vec` that maintains
the uniqueness property, can be collected into, and is itself
`EntitySet`.

A lot of entity collections are already intended to be "unique", but
have no way of expressing that when stored, other than using an
aforementioned `HashSet`. Such a type helps by limiting or even removing
the need for unsafe on the user side when not using a validated `Set`
type, and makes it easier to interface with other infrastructure like
f.e. `RelationshipSourceCollection`s.

## Solution

We implement `UniqueEntityVec`. 

This is a wrapper around `Vec`, that only ever contains unique elements.
It mirrors the API of `Vec`, however restricts any mutation as to not
violate the uniqueness guarantee. Meaning:
- Any inherent method which can introduce new elements or mutate
existing ones is now unsafe, f.e.: `insert`, `retain_mut`
- Methods that are impossible to use safely are omitted, f.e.: `fill`,
`extend_from_within`

A handful of the unsafe methods can do element-wise mutation
(`retain_mut`, `dedup_by`), which can be an unwind safety hazard were
the element-wise operation to panic. For those methods, we require that
each individual execution of the operation upholds uniqueness, not just
the entire method as a whole.

To be safe for mutable usage, slicing and the associated slice methods
require a matching `UniqueEntitySlice` type , which we leave for a
follow-up PR.

Because this type will deref into the `UniqueEntitySlice` type, we also
offer the immutable `Vec` methods on this type (which only amount to a
handful). "as inner" functionality is covered by additional
`as_vec`/`as_mut_vec` methods + `AsRef`/`Borrow` trait impls.
Like `UniqueEntityIter::from_iterator_unchecked`, this type has a
`from_vec_unchecked` method as well.

The canonical way to safely obtain this type however is via
`EntitySetIterator::collect_set` or
`UniqueEntityVec::from_entity_set_iter`. Like mentioned in #17513, these
are named suboptimally until supertrait item shadowing arrives, since a
normal `collect` will still run equality checks.
2025-01-28 06:00:59 +00:00
berry
95174f3c6e
Fix docs mistake in bevy_ecs::world (#17336)
# Objective

- Correct a mistake in the rustdoc for bevy_ecs::world::World.

## Solution

- The rustdoc wrongly stated that "Each component can have up to one
instance of each component type.". This sentence should presumably be
"Each *Entity* can have up to one instance of each component type.".
Applying this change makes the prior sentence "Each [`Entity`] has a set
of components." redundant.

---------

Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
2025-01-28 05:20:31 +00:00