# Objective
When reviewing #18263, I noticed that `BevyManifest` internally stores a
`DocumentMut`, a mutable TOML document, instead of an `ImDocument`, an
immutable one. The process of creating a `DocumentMut` first involves
creating a `ImDocument` and then cloning all the referenced spans of
text into their own allocations (internally referred to as `despan` in
`toml_edit`). As such, using a `DocumentMut` without mutation is
strictly additional overhead.
In addition, I noticed that the filesystem operations associated with
reading a manifest and parsing it were written to be completed _while_ a
write-lock was held on `MANIFESTS`. This likely doesn't translate into a
performance or deadlock issue as the manifest files are generally small
and can be read quickly, but it is generally considered a bad practice.
## Solution
- Switched to `ImDocument<Box<str>>` instead of `DocumentMut`
- Re-ordered operations in `BevyManifest::shared` to minimise time spent
holding open the write-lock on `MANIFESTS`
## Testing
- CI
---
## Notes
I wasn't able to measure a meaningful performance difference with this
PR, so this is purely a code quality change and not one for performance.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#18103#17330 introduced a significant compile time performance regression
(affects normal builds, clippy, and Rust Analyzer). While it did fix the
type-resolution bug (and the general approach there is still our best
known solution to the problem that doesn't involve [significant
maintenance
overhead](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/18103#issuecomment-2702724676)),
the changes had a couple of issues:
1. It used a Mutex, which poses a significant threat to parallelization.
2. It externalized existing, relatively simple, performance critical
Bevy code to a crate outside of our control. I am not comfortable doing
that for cases like this. Going forward @bevyengine/maintainer-team
should be much stricter about this.
3. There were a number of other areas that introduced complexity and
overhead that I consider unnecessary for our use case. On a case by case
basis, if we encounter a need for more capabilities we can add them (and
weigh them against the cost of doing so).
## Solution
1. I moved us back to our original code as a baseline
2. I selectively ported over the minimal changes required to fix the
type resolution bug
3. I swapped `Mutex<BTreeMap<PathBuf, &'static Mutex<CargoManifest>>>`
for `RwLock<BTreeMap<PathBuf, CargoManifest>>`. Note that I used the
`parking_lot` RwLock because it has a mapping API that enables us to
return mapped guards.
This is a follow up fix for #17330 and fixes#17780.
There was a logic error in the ambiguity detection of
`cargo-manifest-proc-macros`.
`cargo-manifest-proc-macros` now has a test for this case to prevent the
issue in the future.
I also opted to hard fail if the `cargo-manifest-proc-macros` crate
fails. That way the error is more obvious and easier to fix and
diagnose.
## Testing
- The reproducer:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy_editor_prototypes/pull/178 works for
me using these fixes.
This pr uses the `extern crate self as` trick to make proc macros behave
the same way inside and outside bevy.
# Objective
- Removes noise introduced by `crate as` in the whole bevy repo.
- Fixes#17004.
- Hardens proc macro path resolution.
## TODO
- [x] `BevyManifest` needs cleanup.
- [x] Cleanup remaining `crate as`.
- [x] Add proper integration tests to the ci.
## Notes
- `cargo-manifest-proc-macros` is written by me and based/inspired by
the old `BevyManifest` implementation and
[`bkchr/proc-macro-crate`](https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate).
- What do you think about the new integration test machinery I added to
the `ci`?
More and better integration tests can be added at a later stage.
The goal of these integration tests is to simulate an actual separate
crate that uses bevy. Ideally they would lightly touch all bevy crates.
## Testing
- Needs RA test
- Needs testing from other users
- Others need to run at least `cargo run -p ci integration-test` and
verify that they work.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Minor consistency improvement in proc macro code.
- Remove `get_path_direct` since it was only used once anyways and
doesn't add much.
## Solution
- Possibly a minor performance improvement since the `Cargo.toml` wont
be parsed as often.
## Testing
- I don't think it breaks anything.
- This is my first time working on bevy itself. Is there a script to do
a quick verify of my pr?
## Other PR
Similar to #7536 but has no extra dependencies.
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
# Objective
- `toml_edit` released a new patch that deprecates `Document`
- this warns when Bevy builds, and CI deny warns
## Solution
- fix deprecation warnings
# Objective
- Fixes#9363
## Solution
Moved `fq_std` from `bevy_reflect_derive` to `bevy_macro_utils`. This
does make the `FQ*` types public where they were previously private,
which is a change to the public-facing API, but I don't believe a
breaking one. Additionally, I've done a basic QA pass over the
`bevy_macro_utils` crate, adding `deny(unsafe)`, `warn(missing_docs)`,
and documentation where required.
