884ebbf4b7
13 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Aceeri
|
ddfafab971 |
Windows as Entities (#5589)
# Objective Fix https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4530 - Make it easier to open/close/modify windows by setting them up as `Entity`s with a `Window` component. - Make multiple windows very simple to set up. (just add a `Window` component to an entity and it should open) ## Solution - Move all properties of window descriptor to ~components~ a component. - Replace `WindowId` with `Entity`. - ~Use change detection for components to update backend rather than events/commands. (The `CursorMoved`/`WindowResized`/... events are kept for user convenience.~ Check each field individually to see what we need to update, events are still kept for user convenience. --- ## Changelog - `WindowDescriptor` renamed to `Window`. - Width/height consolidated into a `WindowResolution` component. - Requesting maximization/minimization is done on the [`Window::state`] field. - `WindowId` is now `Entity`. ## Migration Guide - Replace `WindowDescriptor` with `Window`. - Change `width` and `height` fields in a `WindowResolution`, either by doing ```rust WindowResolution::new(width, height) // Explicitly // or using From<_> for tuples for convenience (1920., 1080.).into() ``` - Replace any `WindowCommand` code to just modify the `Window`'s fields directly and creating/closing windows is now by spawning/despawning an entity with a `Window` component like so: ```rust let window = commands.spawn(Window { ... }).id(); // open window commands.entity(window).despawn(); // close window ``` ## Unresolved - ~How do we tell when a window is minimized by a user?~ ~Currently using the `Resize(0, 0)` as an indicator of minimization.~ No longer attempting to tell given how finnicky this was across platforms, now the user can only request that a window be maximized/minimized. ## Future work - Move `exit_on_close` functionality out from windowing and into app(?) - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5621 - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7099 - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7098 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
1bb751cb8d |
Plugins own their settings. Rework PluginGroup trait. (#6336)
# Objective Fixes #5884 #2879 Alternative to #2988 #5885 #2886 "Immutable" Plugin settings are currently represented as normal ECS resources, which are read as part of plugin init. This presents a number of problems: 1. If a user inserts the plugin settings resource after the plugin is initialized, it will be silently ignored (and use the defaults instead) 2. Users can modify the plugin settings resource after the plugin has been initialized. This creates a false sense of control over settings that can no longer be changed. (1) and (2) are especially problematic and confusing for the `WindowDescriptor` resource, but this is a general problem. ## Solution Immutable Plugin settings now live on each Plugin struct (ex: `WindowPlugin`). PluginGroups have been reworked to support overriding plugin values. This also removes the need for the `add_plugins_with` api, as the `add_plugins` api can use the builder pattern directly. Settings that can be used at runtime continue to be represented as ECS resources. Plugins are now configured like this: ```rust app.add_plugin(AssetPlugin { watch_for_changes: true, ..default() }) ``` PluginGroups are now configured like this: ```rust app.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins .set(AssetPlugin { watch_for_changes: true, ..default() }) ) ``` This is an alternative to #2988, which is similar. But I personally prefer this solution for a couple of reasons: * ~~#2988 doesn't solve (1)~~ #2988 does solve (1) and will panic in that case. I was wrong! * This PR directly ties plugin settings to Plugin types in a 1:1 relationship, rather than a loose "setup resource" <-> plugin coupling (where the setup resource is consumed by the first plugin that uses it). * I'm not a huge fan of overloading the ECS resource concept and implementation for something that has very different use cases and constraints. ## Changelog - PluginGroups can now be configured directly using the builder pattern. Individual plugin values can be overridden by using `plugin_group.set(SomePlugin {})`, which enables overriding default plugin values. - `WindowDescriptor` plugin settings have been moved to `WindowPlugin` and `AssetServerSettings` have been moved to `AssetPlugin` - `app.add_plugins_with` has been replaced by using `add_plugins` with the builder pattern. ## Migration Guide The `WindowDescriptor` settings have been moved from a resource to `WindowPlugin::window`: ```rust // Old (Bevy 0.8) app .insert_resource(WindowDescriptor { width: 400.0, ..default() }) .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) // New (Bevy 0.9) app.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins.set(WindowPlugin { window: WindowDescriptor { width: 400.0, ..default() }, ..default() })) ``` The `AssetServerSettings` resource has been removed in favor of direct `AssetPlugin` configuration: ```rust // Old (Bevy 0.8) app .insert_resource(AssetServerSettings { watch_for_changes: true, ..default() }) .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) // New (Bevy 0.9) app.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins.set(AssetPlugin { watch_for_changes: true, ..default() })) ``` `add_plugins_with` has been replaced by `add_plugins` in combination with the builder pattern: ```rust // Old (Bevy 0.8) app.add_plugins_with(DefaultPlugins, |group| group.disable::<AssetPlugin>()); // New (Bevy 0.9) app.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins.build().disable::<AssetPlugin>()); ``` |
||
|
Lena Milizé
|
73605f43b6 |
Replace the bool argument of Timer with TimerMode (#6247)
As mentioned in #2926, it's better to have an explicit type that clearly communicates the intent of the timer mode rather than an opaque boolean, which can be only understood when knowing the signature or having to look up the documentation. This also opens up a way to merge different timers, such as `Stopwatch`, and possibly future ones, such as `DiscreteStopwatch` and `DiscreteTimer` from #2683, into one struct. Signed-off-by: Lena Milizé <me@lvmn.org> # Objective Fixes #2926. ## Solution Introduce `TimerMode` which replaces the `bool` argument of `Timer` constructors. A `Default` value for `TimerMode` is `Once`. --- ## Changelog ### Added - `TimerMode` enum, along with variants `TimerMode::Once` and `TimerMode::Repeating` ### Changed - Replace `bool` argument of `Timer::new` and `Timer::from_seconds` with `TimerMode` - Change `repeating: bool` field of `Timer` with `mode: TimerMode` ## Migration Guide - Replace `Timer::new(duration, false)` with `Timer::new(duration, TimerMode::Once)`. - Replace `Timer::new(duration, true)` with `Timer::new(duration, TimerMode::Repeating)`. - Replace `Timer::from_seconds(seconds, false)` with `Timer::from_seconds(seconds, TimerMode::Once)`. - Replace `Timer::from_seconds(seconds, true)` with `Timer::from_seconds(seconds, TimerMode::Repeating)`. - Change `timer.repeating()` to `timer.mode() == TimerMode::Repeating`. |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
01aedc8431 |
Spawn now takes a Bundle (#6054)
# Objective Now that we can consolidate Bundles and Components under a single insert (thanks to #2975 and #6039), almost 100% of world spawns now look like `world.spawn().insert((Some, Tuple, Here))`. Spawning an entity without any components is an extremely uncommon pattern, so it makes sense to give spawn the "first class" ergonomic api. This consolidated api should be made consistent across all spawn apis (such as World and Commands). ## Solution All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input: ```rust // before: commands .spawn() .insert((A, B, C)); world .spawn() .insert((A, B, C); // after commands.spawn((A, B, C)); world.spawn((A, B, C)); ``` All existing instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api. A new `spawn_empty` has been added, replacing the old `spawn` api. By allowing `world.spawn(some_bundle)` to replace `world.spawn().insert(some_bundle)`, this opened the door to removing the initial entity allocation in the "empty" archetype / table done in `spawn()` (and subsequent move to the actual archetype in `.insert(some_bundle)`). This improves spawn performance by over 10%:  To take this measurement, I added a new `world_spawn` benchmark. Unfortunately, optimizing `Commands::spawn` is slightly less trivial, as Commands expose the Entity id of spawned entities prior to actually spawning. Doing the optimization would (naively) require assurances that the `spawn(some_bundle)` command is applied before all other commands involving the entity (which would not necessarily be true, if memory serves). Optimizing `Commands::spawn` this way does feel possible, but it will require careful thought (and maybe some additional checks), which deserves its own PR. For now, it has the same performance characteristics of the current `Commands::spawn_bundle` on main. **Note that 99% of this PR is simple renames and refactors. The only code that needs careful scrutiny is the new `World::spawn()` impl, which is relatively straightforward, but it has some new unsafe code (which re-uses battle tested BundlerSpawner code path).** --- ## Changelog - All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input - All instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api - World and Commands now have `spawn_empty()`, which is equivalent to the old `spawn()` behavior. ## Migration Guide ```rust // Old (0.8): commands .spawn() .insert_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): commands.spawn_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): let entity = commands.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = commands.spawn_empty().id(); // Old (0.8) let entity = world.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = world.spawn_empty(); ``` |
||
|
ira
|
65252bb87a |
Consistently use PI to specify angles in examples. (#5825)
Examples inconsistently use either `TAU`, `PI`, `FRAC_PI_2` or `FRAC_PI_4`. Often in odd ways and without `use`ing the constants, making it difficult to parse. * Use `PI` to specify angles. * General code-quality improvements. * Fix borked `hierarchy` example. Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
40d4992401 |
Visibilty Inheritance, universal ComputedVisibility and RenderLayers support (#5310)
# Objective Fixes #4907. Fixes #838. Fixes #5089. Supersedes #5146. Supersedes #2087. Supersedes #865. Supersedes #5114 Visibility is currently entirely local. Set a parent entity to be invisible, and the children are still visible. This makes it hard for users to hide entire hierarchies of entities. Additionally, the semantics of `Visibility` vs `ComputedVisibility` are inconsistent across entity types. 3D meshes use `ComputedVisibility` as the "definitive" visibility component, with `Visibility` being just one data source. Sprites just use `Visibility`, which means they can't feed off of `ComputedVisibility` data, such as culling information, RenderLayers, and (added in this pr) visibility inheritance information. ## Solution Splits `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible` into `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_view` and `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_hierarchy`. For each visible entity, `is_visible_in_hierarchy` is computed by propagating visibility down the hierarchy. The `ComputedVisibility::is_visible()` function combines these two booleans for the canonical "is this entity visible" function. Additionally, all entities that have `Visibility` now also have `ComputedVisibility`. Sprites, Lights, and UI entities now use `ComputedVisibility` when appropriate. This means that in addition to visibility inheritance, everything using Visibility now also supports RenderLayers. Notably, Sprites (and other 2d objects) now support `RenderLayers` and work properly across multiple views. Also note that this does increase the amount of work done per sprite. Bevymark with 100,000 sprites on `main` runs in `0.017612` seconds and this runs in `0.01902`. That is certainly a gap, but I believe the api consistency and extra functionality this buys us is worth it. See [this thread](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for more info. Note that #5146 in combination with #5114 _are_ a viable alternative to this PR and _would_ perform better, but that comes at the cost of api inconsistencies and doing visibility calculations in the "wrong" place. The current visibility system does have potential for performance improvements. I would prefer to evolve that one system as a whole rather than doing custom hacks / different behaviors for each feature slice. Here is a "split screen" example where the left camera uses RenderLayers to filter out the blue sprite.  Note that this builds directly on #5146 and that @james7132 deserves the credit for the baseline visibility inheritance work. This pr moves the inherited visibility field into `ComputedVisibility`, then does the additional work of porting everything to `ComputedVisibility`. See my [comments here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for rationale. ## Follow up work * Now that lights use ComputedVisibility, VisibleEntities now includes "visible lights" in the entity list. Functionally not a problem as we use queries to filter the list down in the desired context. But we should consider splitting this out into a separate`VisibleLights` collection for both clarity and performance reasons. And _maybe_ even consider scoping `VisibleEntities` down to `VisibleMeshes`?. * Investigate alternative sprite rendering impls (in combination with visibility system tweaks) that avoid re-generating a per-view fixedbitset of visible entities every frame, then checking each ExtractedEntity. This is where most of the performance overhead lives. Ex: we could generate ExtractedEntities per-view using the VisibleEntities list, avoiding the need for the bitset. * Should ComputedVisibility use bitflags under the hood? This would cut down on the size of the component, potentially speed up the `is_visible()` function, and allow us to cheaply expand ComputedVisibility with more data (ex: split out local visibility and parent visibility, add more culling classes, etc). --- ## Changelog * ComputedVisibility now takes hierarchy visibility into account. * 2D, UI and Light entities now use the ComputedVisibility component. ## Migration Guide If you were previously reading `Visibility::is_visible` as the "actual visibility" for sprites or lights, use `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible()` instead: ```rust // before (0.7) fn system(query: Query<&Visibility>) { for visibility in query.iter() { if visibility.is_visible { log!("found visible entity"); } } } // after (0.8) fn system(query: Query<&ComputedVisibility>) { for visibility in query.iter() { if visibility.is_visible() { log!("found visible entity"); } } } ``` Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
|
François
|
814f8d1635 |
update wgpu to 0.13 (#5168)
# Objective - Update wgpu to 0.13 - ~~Wait, is wgpu 0.13 released? No, but I had most of the changes already ready since playing with webgpu~~ well it has been released now - Also update parking_lot to 0.12 and naga to 0.9 ## Solution - Update syntax for wgsl shaders https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#wgsl-syntax - Add a few options, remove some references: https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#other-breaking-changes - fragment inputs should now exactly match vertex outputs for locations, so I added exports for those to be able to reuse them https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/pull/2704 |
||
|
Troels Jessen
|
b3d15153f3 |
Added performance warning when running stress test examples in debug mode (#5029)
# Objective Fixes #5028 ## Solution Used #[cfg(debug_assertions)] to display a warning when running examples under stress_tests in debug mode |
||
|
Elabajaba
|
72e7358636 |
Disable Vsync for stress tests. (#5187)
# Objective Currently stress tests are vsynced. This is undesirable for a stress test, as you want to run them with uncapped framerates. ## Solution Ensure all stress tests are using PresentMode::Immediate if they render anything. |
||
|
ira
|
ea13f0bddf |
Add helper methods for rotating Transforms (#5151)
# Objective Users often ask for help with rotations as they struggle with `Quat`s. `Quat` is rather complex and has a ton of verbose methods. ## Solution Add rotation helper methods to `Transform`. Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
f487407e07 |
Camera Driven Rendering (#4745)
This adds "high level camera driven rendering" to Bevy. The goal is to give users more control over what gets rendered (and where) without needing to deal with render logic. This will make scenarios like "render to texture", "multiple windows", "split screen", "2d on 3d", "3d on 2d", "pass layering", and more significantly easier. Here is an [example of a 2d render sandwiched between two 3d renders (each from a different perspective)](https://gist.github.com/cart/4fe56874b2e53bc5594a182fc76f4915):  Users can now spawn a camera, point it at a RenderTarget (a texture or a window), and it will "just work". Rendering to a second window is as simple as spawning a second camera and assigning it to a specific window id: ```rust // main camera (main window) commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); // second camera (other window) commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle { camera: Camera { target: RenderTarget::Window(window_id), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` Rendering to a texture is as simple as pointing the camera at a texture: ```rust commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle { camera: Camera { target: RenderTarget::Texture(image_handle), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` Cameras now have a "render priority", which controls the order they are drawn in. If you want to use a camera's output texture as a texture in the main pass, just set the priority to a number lower than the main pass camera (which defaults to `0`). ```rust // main pass camera with a default priority of 0 commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle { camera: Camera { target: RenderTarget::Texture(image_handle.clone()), priority: -1, ..default() }, ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(SpriteBundle { texture: image_handle, ..default() }) ``` Priority can also be used to layer to cameras on top of each other for the same RenderTarget. This is what "2d on top of 3d" looks like in the new system: ```rust commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle::default()); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle { camera: Camera { // this will render 2d entities "on top" of the default 3d camera's render priority: 1, ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` There is no longer the concept of a global "active camera". Resources like `ActiveCamera<Camera2d>` and `ActiveCamera<Camera3d>` have been replaced with the camera-specific `Camera::is_active` field. This does put the onus on users to manage which cameras should be active. Cameras are now assigned a single render graph as an "entry point", which is configured on each camera entity using the new `CameraRenderGraph` component. The old `PerspectiveCameraBundle` and `OrthographicCameraBundle` (generic on camera marker components like Camera2d and Camera3d) have been replaced by `Camera3dBundle` and `Camera2dBundle`, which set 3d and 2d default values for the `CameraRenderGraph` and projections. ```rust // old 3d perspective camera commands.spawn_bundle(PerspectiveCameraBundle::default()) // new 3d perspective camera commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle::default()) ``` ```rust // old 2d orthographic camera commands.spawn_bundle(OrthographicCameraBundle::new_2d()) // new 2d orthographic camera commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()) ``` ```rust // old 3d orthographic camera commands.spawn_bundle(OrthographicCameraBundle::new_3d()) // new 3d orthographic camera commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { projection: OrthographicProjection { scale: 3.0, scaling_mode: ScalingMode::FixedVertical, ..default() }.into(), ..default() }) ``` Note that `Camera3dBundle` now uses a new `Projection` enum instead of hard coding the projection into the type. There are a number of motivators for this change: the render graph is now a part of the bundle, the way "generic bundles" work in the rust type system prevents nice `..default()` syntax, and changing projections at runtime is much easier with an enum (ex for editor scenarios). I'm open to discussing this choice, but I'm relatively certain we will all come to the same conclusion here. Camera2dBundle and Camera3dBundle are much clearer than being generic on marker components / using non-default constructors. If you want to run a custom render graph on a camera, just set the `CameraRenderGraph` component: ```rust commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera_render_graph: CameraRenderGraph::new(some_render_graph_name), ..default() }) ``` Just note that if the graph requires data from specific components to work (such as `Camera3d` config, which is provided in the `Camera3dBundle`), make sure the relevant components have been added. Speaking of using components to configure graphs / passes, there are a number of new configuration options: ```rust commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera_3d: Camera3d { // overrides the default global clear color clear_color: ClearColorConfig::Custom(Color::RED), ..default() }, ..default() }) commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera_3d: Camera3d { // disables clearing clear_color: ClearColorConfig::None, ..default() }, ..default() }) ``` Expect to see more of the "graph configuration Components on Cameras" pattern in the future. By popular demand, UI no longer requires a dedicated camera. `UiCameraBundle` has been removed. `Camera2dBundle` and `Camera3dBundle` now both default to rendering UI as part of their own render graphs. To disable UI rendering for a camera, disable it using the CameraUi component: ```rust commands .spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle::default()) .insert(CameraUi { is_enabled: false, ..default() }) ``` ## Other Changes * The separate clear pass has been removed. We should revisit this for things like sky rendering, but I think this PR should "keep it simple" until we're ready to properly support that (for code complexity and performance reasons). We can come up with the right design for a modular clear pass in a followup pr. * I reorganized bevy_core_pipeline into Core2dPlugin and Core3dPlugin (and core_2d / core_3d modules). Everything is pretty much the same as before, just logically separate. I've moved relevant types (like Camera2d, Camera3d, Camera3dBundle, Camera2dBundle) into their relevant modules, which is what motivated this reorganization. * I adapted the `scene_viewer` example (which relied on the ActiveCameras behavior) to the new system. I also refactored bits and pieces to be a bit simpler. * All of the examples have been ported to the new camera approach. `render_to_texture` and `multiple_windows` are now _much_ simpler. I removed `two_passes` because it is less relevant with the new approach. If someone wants to add a new "layered custom pass with CameraRenderGraph" example, that might fill a similar niche. But I don't feel much pressure to add that in this pr. * Cameras now have `target_logical_size` and `target_physical_size` fields, which makes finding the size of a camera's render target _much_ simpler. As a result, the `Assets<Image>` and `Windows` parameters were removed from `Camera::world_to_screen`, making that operation much more ergonomic. * Render order ambiguities between cameras with the same target and the same priority now produce a warning. This accomplishes two goals: 1. Now that there is no "global" active camera, by default spawning two cameras will result in two renders (one covering the other). This would be a silent performance killer that would be hard to detect after the fact. By detecting ambiguities, we can provide a helpful warning when this occurs. 2. Render order ambiguities could result in unexpected / unpredictable render results. Resolving them makes sense. ## Follow Up Work * Per-Camera viewports, which will make it possible to render to a smaller area inside of a RenderTarget (great for something like splitscreen) * Camera-specific MSAA config (should use the same "overriding" pattern used for ClearColor) * Graph Based Camera Ordering: priorities are simple, but they make complicated ordering constraints harder to express. We should consider adopting a "graph based" camera ordering model with "before" and "after" relationships to other cameras (or build it "on top" of the priority system). * Consider allowing graphs to run subgraphs from any nest level (aka a global namespace for graphs). Right now the 2d and 3d graphs each need their own UI subgraph, which feels "fine" in the short term. But being able to share subgraphs between other subgraphs seems valuable. * Consider splitting `bevy_core_pipeline` into `bevy_core_2d` and `bevy_core_3d` packages. Theres a shared "clear color" dependency here, which would need a new home. |
||
|
Mark Schmale
|
1ba7429371 |
Doc/module style doc blocks for examples (#4438)
# Objective Provide a starting point for #3951, or a partial solution. Providing a few comment blocks to discuss, and hopefully find better one in the process. ## Solution Since I am pretty new to pretty much anything in this context, I figured I'd just start with a draft for some file level doc blocks. For some of them I found more relevant details (or at least things I considered interessting), for some others there is less. ## Changelog - Moved some existing comments from main() functions in the 2d examples to the file header level - Wrote some more comment blocks for most other 2d examples TODO: - [x] 2d/sprite_sheet, wasnt able to come up with something good yet - [x] all other example groups... Also: Please let me know if the commit style is okay, or to verbose. I could certainly squash these things, or add more details if needed. I also hope its okay to raise this PR this early, with just a few files changed. Took me long enough and I dont wanted to let it go to waste because I lost motivation to do the whole thing. Additionally I am somewhat uncertain over the style and contents of the commets. So let me know what you thing please. |
||
|
Alice Cecile
|
c747cc526b |
Group stress test examples (#4289)
# Objective - Several examples are useful for qualitative tests of Bevy's performance - By contrast, these are less useful for learning material: they are often relatively complex and have large amounts of setup and are performance optimized. ## Solution - Move bevymark, many_sprites and many_cubes into the new stress_tests example folder - Move contributors into the games folder: unlike the remaining examples in the 2d folder, it is not focused on demonstrating a clear feature. |
