# Objective
- Progress towards #19024.
## Solution
- Remove `Handle::Weak`!
If users were relying on `Handle::Weak` for some purpose, they can
almost certainly replace it with raw `AssetId` instead. If they cannot,
they can make their own enum that holds either a Handle or an AssetId.
In either case, we don't need weak handles!
Sadly we still need Uuid handles since we rely on them for "default"
assets and "invalid" assets, as well as anywhere where a component wants
to impl default with a non-defaulted asset handle. One step at a time
though!
# Objective
- #17581 broke gizmos
- Fixes#18325
## Solution
- Revert #17581
- Add gizmos to testbed
## Testing
- Run any example with gizmos, it renders correctly
# Objective
Now that #13432 has been merged, it's important we update our reflected
types to properly opt into this feature. If we do not, then this could
cause issues for users downstream who want to make use of
reflection-based cloning.
## Solution
This PR is broken into 4 commits:
1. Add `#[reflect(Clone)]` on all types marked `#[reflect(opaque)]` that
are also `Clone`. This is mandatory as these types would otherwise cause
the cloning operation to fail for any type that contains it at any
depth.
2. Update the reflection example to suggest adding `#[reflect(Clone)]`
on opaque types.
3. Add `#[reflect(clone)]` attributes on all fields marked
`#[reflect(ignore)]` that are also `Clone`. This prevents the ignored
field from causing the cloning operation to fail.
Note that some of the types that contain these fields are also `Clone`,
and thus can be marked `#[reflect(Clone)]`. This makes the
`#[reflect(clone)]` attribute redundant. However, I think it's safer to
keep it marked in the case that the `Clone` impl/derive is ever removed.
I'm open to removing them, though, if people disagree.
4. Finally, I added `#[reflect(Clone)]` on all types that are also
`Clone`. While not strictly necessary, it enables us to reduce the
generated output since we can just call `Clone::clone` directly instead
of calling `PartialReflect::reflect_clone` on each variant/field. It
also means we benefit from any optimizations or customizations made in
the `Clone` impl, including directly dereferencing `Copy` values and
increasing reference counters.
Along with that change I also took the liberty of adding any missing
registrations that I saw could be applied to the type as well, such as
`Default`, `PartialEq`, and `Hash`. There were hundreds of these to
edit, though, so it's possible I missed quite a few.
That last commit is **_massive_**. There were nearly 700 types to
update. So it's recommended to review the first three before moving onto
that last one.
Additionally, I can break the last commit off into its own PR or into
smaller PRs, but I figured this would be the easiest way of doing it
(and in a timely manner since I unfortunately don't have as much time as
I used to for code contributions).
## Testing
You can test locally with a `cargo check`:
```
cargo check --workspace --all-features
```
# Objective
This PR enables `bevy_gizmos` to be used without `bevy_pbr`, for user
who want to create their custom mesh rendering logic.
It can also be useful for user who just want to use bevy for drawing
lines (why not).
This work is part of a bigger effort to make the bevy rendering pipeline
more modular. I would like to contribute an exemple to render custom
meshes without `bevy_pbr`. Something like
[this](https://github.com/rambip/plant-mesh/blob/main/src/shader/mod.rs)
## Solution
Now, `bevy_pbr` is an optional dependency, and used only to debug
lights.
I query the `ViewUniforms` manually, instead of using `bevy_pbr` to get
the heavy `MeshViewLayout`
## Testing
I'm not used to testing with bevy at all, but I was able to use
successfully in my project.
It might break for some different mesh pipelines, but I don't think so.
---
## Showcase
So nice ...
## Migration Guide
I don't think there is any breaking change
# Remaining work
Before merging it, it would be useful to:
- rewrite the `pipeline_2d.rs` logic to remove the `bevy_sprite`
depedency too
- move `view.rs` to `bevy_render`, so that it can be used in a more
modular way.
~~- include the most recent changes from 0.16~~
---------
Co-authored-by: IceSentry <IceSentry@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Component `require()` IDE integration is fully broken, as of #16575.
## Solution
This reverts us back to the previous "put the docs on Component trait"
impl. This _does_ reduce the accessibility of the required components in
rust docs, but the complete erasure of "required component IDE
experience" is not worth the price of slightly increased prominence of
requires in docs.
Additionally, Rust Analyzer has recently started including derive
attributes in suggestions, so we aren't losing that benefit of the
proc_macro attribute impl.
# Objective
- Contributes to #11478
## Solution
- Made `bevy_utils::tracing` `doc(hidden)`
- Re-exported `tracing` from `bevy_log` for end-users
- Added `tracing` directly to crates that need it.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
If you were importing `tracing` via `bevy::utils::tracing`, instead use
`bevy::log::tracing`. Note that many items within `tracing` are also
directly re-exported from `bevy::log` as well, so you may only need
`bevy::log` for the most common items (e.g., `warn!`, `trace!`, etc.).
This also applies to the `log_once!` family of macros.
## Notes
- While this doesn't reduce the line-count in `bevy_utils`, it further
decouples the internal crates from `bevy_utils`, making its eventual
removal more feasible in the future.
- I have just imported `tracing` as we do for all dependencies. However,
a workspace dependency may be more appropriate for version management.
# Objective
- Fixes#16873
## Solution
- Added `GizmoLineStyle::Dashed {gap_scale, line_scale}`
- The `gap_scale` and `line_scale` describe the lengths of the gaps and
visible line-segments in terms of line-widths. For example, if
`gap_scale == 1.0` and `line_scale == 3.0` the gaps are square and the
the visible segments are three line-widths long.
- The new `GizmoLineStyle` can be used both in 3D and 2D and with both
perspective and orthographic cameras.
- Updated the `2d_gizmos` and `3d_gizmos` examples to include the new
line-style.
- Display a warning, when using negative `gap_scale` or `line_scale`.
- Notably, `Hash` and `Eq` are manually implemented for `GizmoLineStyle`
since both are not implemented for `f32` which prevents deriving these
traits for `GizmoLineStyle`.
## Testing
- The results can be verified visually
---
## Showcase
The following images depict dashed lines with `gap_scale == 3.0` and
`line_scale == 5.0` in perspective 3D and orthographic 2D.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#16659
## Solution
- I just added all the `#[reflect(Component)]` attributes where
necessary.
## Testing
I wrote a small program that scans the bevy code for all structs and
enums that derive `Component` and `Reflect`, but don't have the
attribute `#[reflect(Component)]`.
I don't know if this testing program should be part of the testing suite
of bevy. It takes a bit of time to scan the whole codebase. In any case,
I've published it [here](https://github.com/anlumo/bevy-reflect-check).
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Add a way to use the gizmo API in a retained manner, for increased
performance.
## Solution
- Move gizmo API from `Gizmos` to `GizmoBuffer`, ~ab~using `Deref` to
keep usage the same as before.
- Merge non-strip and strip variant of `LineGizmo` into one, storing the
data in a `GizmoBuffer` to have the same API for retained `LineGizmo`s.
### Review guide
- The meat of the changes are in `lib.rs`, `retained.rs`, `gizmos.rs`,
`pipeline_3d.rs` and `pipeline_2d.rs`
- The other files contain almost exclusively the churn from moving the
gizmo API from `Gizmos` to `GizmoBuffer`
## Testing
### Performance
Performance compared to the immediate mode API is from 65 to 80 times
better for static lines.
```
7900 XTX, 3700X
1707.9k lines/ms: gizmos_retained (21.3ms)
3488.5k lines/ms: gizmos_retained_continuous_polyline (31.3ms)
0.5k lines/ms: gizmos_retained_separate (97.7ms)
3054.9k lines/ms: bevy_polyline_retained_nan (16.8ms)
3596.3k lines/ms: bevy_polyline_retained_continuous_polyline (14.2ms)
0.6k lines/ms: bevy_polyline_retained_separate (78.9ms)
26.9k lines/ms: gizmos_immediate (14.9ms)
43.8k lines/ms: gizmos_immediate_continuous_polyline (18.3ms)
```
Looks like performance is good enough, being close to par with
`bevy_polyline`.
Benchmarks can be found here:
This branch:
https://github.com/tim-blackbird/line_racing/tree/retained-gizmos
Bevy 0.14: https://github.com/DGriffin91/line_racing
## Showcase
```rust
fn setup(
mut commands: Commands,
mut gizmo_assets: ResMut<Assets<GizmoAsset>>
) {
let mut gizmo = GizmoAsset::default();
// A sphere made out of one million lines!
gizmo
.sphere(default(), 1., CRIMSON)
.resolution(1_000_000 / 3);
commands.spawn(Gizmo {
handle: gizmo_assets.add(gizmo),
..default()
});
}
```
## Follow-up work
- Port over to the retained rendering world proper
- Calculate visibility and cull `Gizmo`s
