dae8d23a58
266 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tim
|
4e9e78c31e
|
Split BufferedEvent from Event (#20101)
# Objective > I think we should axe the shared `Event` trait entirely It doesn't serve any functional purpose, and I don't think it's useful pedagogically @alice-i-cecile on discord ## Solution - Remove `Event` as a supertrait of `BufferedEvent` - Remove any `Event` derives that were made unnecessary - Update release notes --------- Co-authored-by: SpecificProtagonist <vincentjunge@posteo.net> |
||
|
Giacomo Stevanato
|
89c3a979e6
|
Prevent TOCTOU bugs in ComponentsQueuedRegistrator (#20016)
# Objective - Fix #20014 ## Solution - Don't make the `force_register_` family of functions always enqueue of the component/resource; instead have them check again whether it was already queued or not. ## Testing - I added a small regression test but it's non-deterministic: if the bug is fixed it will always pass, but if the bug is presen then it has a (hopefully small) chance of passing. On my PC it failed after ~100 iterations, so hopefully 1000 is enough in CI (assuming it doesn't have single core runners...) --------- Co-authored-by: JaySpruce <jsprucebruce@gmail.com> |
||
|
Daniel Skates
|
560429ebd9
|
Observer trigger refactor (#19935)
# Objective - The usage of ComponentId is quite confusing: events are not components. By newtyping this, we can prevent stupid mistakes, avoid leaking internal details and make the code clearer for users and engine devs reading it. - Adopts https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/19755 --------- Co-authored-by: oscar-benderstone <oscarbenderstone@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Oscar Bender-Stone <88625129+oscar-benderstone@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
mgi388
|
efd17f133d
|
Rename num_entities to entity_count (#19781)
As discussed in https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/19780#issuecomment-2994554024. |
||
|
Trashtalk217
|
6dbe3600ed
|
Add num_entities() to World (#19780)
# Objective There is a lot of `world.entities().len()`, especially in tests. In tests, usually, the assumption is made that empty worlds do not contain any entities. This is about to change (#19711), and as such all of these tests are failing for that PR. ## Solution `num_entities` is a convenience method that returns the number of entities inside a world. It can later be adapted to exclude 'unexpected' entities, associated with internal data structures such as Resources, Queries, Systems. In general I argue for a separation of concepts where `World` ignores internal entities in methods such as `iter_entities()` and `clear_entities()`, that discussion is, however, separate from this PR. ## Testing I replaced most occurrences of `world.entities().len()` with `world.num_entities()` and the tests passed. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
Lailatova
|
5d5a95fa6e
|
Fix issue 19734: add dependency on bevy_utils for the bevy_ecs test. (#19738)
Without this dependency, the bevy_ecs tests fail with missing as_string methods. # Objective - Fixes #19734 ## Solution - add bevy_utils with feature = "Debug" to dev-dependencies ## Testing - Ran `cargo test -p bevy_ecs` - Ran `taplo fmt --check` --- |
||
|
Joona Aalto
|
38c3423693
|
Event Split: Event, EntityEvent, and BufferedEvent (#19647)
# Objective Closes #19564. The current `Event` trait looks like this: ```rust pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } ``` The `Event` trait is used by both buffered events (`EventReader`/`EventWriter`) and observer events. If they are observer events, they can optionally be targeted at specific `Entity`s or `ComponentId`s, and can even be propagated to other entities. However, there has long been a desire to split the trait semantically for a variety of reasons, see #14843, #14272, and #16031 for discussion. Some reasons include: - It's very uncommon to use a single event type as both a buffered event and targeted observer event. They are used differently and tend to have distinct semantics. - A common footgun is using buffered events with observers or event readers with observer events, as there is no type-level error that prevents this kind of misuse. - #19440 made `Trigger::target` return an `Option<Entity>`. This *seriously* hurts ergonomics for the general case of entity observers, as you need to `.unwrap()` each time. If we could statically determine whether the event is expected to have an entity target, this would be unnecessary. There's really two main ways that we can categorize events: push vs. pull (i.e. "observer event" vs. "buffered event") and global vs. targeted: | | Push | Pull | | ------------ | --------------- | --------------------------- | | **Global** | Global observer | `EventReader`/`EventWriter` | | **Targeted** | Entity observer | - | There are many ways to approach this, each with their tradeoffs. Ultimately, we kind of want to split events both ways: - A type-level distinction between observer events and buffered events, to prevent people from using the wrong kind of event in APIs - A statically designated entity target for observer events to avoid accidentally using untargeted events for targeted APIs This PR achieves these goals by splitting event traits into `Event`, `EntityEvent`, and `BufferedEvent`, with `Event` being the shared trait implemented by all events. ## `Event`, `EntityEvent`, and `BufferedEvent` `Event` is now a very simple trait shared by all events. ```rust pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { // Required for observer APIs fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } ``` You can call `trigger` for *any* event, and use a global observer for listening to the event. ```rust #[derive(Event)] struct Speak { message: String, } // ... app.add_observer(|trigger: On<Speak>| { println!("{}", trigger.message); }); // ... commands.trigger(Speak { message: "Y'all like these reworked events?".to_string(), }); ``` To allow an event to be targeted at entities and even propagated further, you can additionally implement the `EntityEvent` trait: ```rust pub trait EntityEvent: Event { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; } ``` This lets you call `trigger_targets`, and to use targeted observer APIs like `EntityCommands::observe`: ```rust #[derive(Event, EntityEvent)] #[entity_event(traversal = &'static ChildOf, auto_propagate)] struct Damage { amount: f32, } // ... let enemy = commands.spawn((Enemy, Health(100.0))).id(); // Spawn some armor as a child of the enemy entity. // When the armor takes damage, it will bubble the event up to the enemy. let armor_piece = commands .spawn((ArmorPiece, Health(25.0), ChildOf(enemy))) .observe(|trigger: On<Damage>, mut query: Query<&mut Health>| { // Note: `On::target` only exists because this is an `EntityEvent`. let mut health = query.get(trigger.target()).unwrap(); health.0 -= trigger.amount(); }); commands.trigger_targets(Damage { amount: 10.0 }, armor_piece); ``` > [!NOTE] > You *can* still also trigger an `EntityEvent` without targets using `trigger`. We probably *could* make this an either-or thing, but I'm not sure that's actually desirable. To allow an event to be used with the buffered API, you can implement `BufferedEvent`: ```rust pub trait BufferedEvent: Event {} ``` The event can then be used with `EventReader`/`EventWriter`: ```rust #[derive(Event, BufferedEvent)] struct Message(String); fn write_hello(mut writer: EventWriter<Message>) { writer.write(Message("I hope these examples are alright".to_string())); } fn read_messages(mut reader: EventReader<Message>) { // Process all buffered events of type `Message`. for Message(message) in reader.read() { println!("{message}"); } } ``` In summary: - Need a basic event you can trigger and observe? Derive `Event`! - Need the event to be targeted at an entity? Derive `EntityEvent`! - Need the event to be buffered and support the `EventReader`/`EventWriter` API? Derive `BufferedEvent`! ## Alternatives I'll now cover some of the alternative approaches I have considered and briefly explored. I made this section collapsible since it ended up being quite long :P <details> <summary>Expand this to see alternatives</summary> ### 1. Unified `Event` Trait One option is not to have *three* separate traits (`Event`, `EntityEvent`, `BufferedEvent`), and to instead just use associated constants on `Event` to determine whether an event supports targeting and buffering or not: ```rust pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; const TARGETED: bool = false; const BUFFERED: bool = false; fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } ``` Methods can then use bounds like `where E: Event<TARGETED = true>` or `where E: Event<BUFFERED = true>` to limit APIs to specific kinds of events. This would keep everything under one `Event` trait, but I don't think it's necessarily a good idea. It makes APIs harder to read, and docs can't easily refer to specific types of events. You can also create weird invariants: what if you specify `TARGETED = false`, but have `Traversal` and/or `AUTO_PROPAGATE` enabled? ### 2. `Event` and `Trigger` Another option is to only split the traits between buffered events and observer events, since that is the main thing people have been asking for, and they have the largest API difference. If we did this, I think we would need to make the terms *clearly* separate. We can't really use `Event` and `BufferedEvent` as the names, since it would be strange that `BufferedEvent` doesn't implement `Event`. Something like `ObserverEvent` and `BufferedEvent` could work, but it'd be more verbose. For this approach, I would instead keep `Event` for the current `EventReader`/`EventWriter` API, and call the observer event a `Trigger`, since the "trigger" terminology is already used in the observer context within Bevy (both as a noun and a verb). This is also what a long [bikeshed on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1298057661878898791) seemed to land on at the end of last year. ```rust // For `EventReader`/`EventWriter` pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static {} // For observers pub trait Trigger: Send + Sync + 'static { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; const TARGETED: bool = false; fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } ``` The problem is that "event" is just a really good term for something that "happens". Observers are rapidly becoming the more prominent API, so it'd be weird to give them the `Trigger` name and leave the good `Event` name for the less common API. So, even though a split like this seems neat on the surface, I think it ultimately wouldn't really work. We want to keep the `Event` name for observer events, and there is no good alternative for the buffered variant. (`Message` was suggested, but saying stuff like "sends a collision message" is weird.) ### 3. `GlobalEvent` + `TargetedEvent` What if instead of focusing on the buffered vs. observed split, we *only* make a distinction between global and targeted events? ```rust // A shared event trait to allow global observers to work pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } // For buffered events and non-targeted observer events pub trait GlobalEvent: Event {} // For targeted observer events pub trait TargetedEvent: Event { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; } ``` This is actually the first approach I implemented, and it has the neat characteristic that you can only use non-targeted APIs like `trigger` with a `GlobalEvent` and targeted APIs like `trigger_targets` with a `TargetedEvent`. You have full control over whether the entity should or should not have a target, as they are fully distinct at the type-level. However, there's a few problems: - There is no type-level indication of whether a `GlobalEvent` supports buffered events or just non-targeted observer events - An `Event` on its own does literally nothing, it's just a shared trait required to make global observers accept both non-targeted and targeted events - If an event is both a `GlobalEvent` and `TargetedEvent`, global observers again have ambiguity on whether an event has a target or not, undermining some of the benefits - The names are not ideal ### 4. `Event` and `EntityEvent` We can fix some of the problems of Alternative 3 by accepting that targeted events can also be used in non-targeted contexts, and simply having the `Event` and `EntityEvent` traits: ```rust // For buffered events and non-targeted observer events pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } // For targeted observer events pub trait EntityEvent: Event { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; } ``` This is essentially identical to this PR, just without a dedicated `BufferedEvent`. The remaining major "problem" is that there is still zero type-level indication of whether an `Event` event *actually* supports the buffered API. This leads us to the solution proposed in this PR, using `Event`, `EntityEvent`, and `BufferedEvent`. </details> ## Conclusion The `Event` + `EntityEvent` + `BufferedEvent` split proposed in this PR aims to solve all the common problems with Bevy's current event model while keeping the "weirdness" factor minimal. It splits in terms of both the push vs. pull *and* global vs. targeted aspects, while maintaining a shared concept for an "event". ### Why I Like This - The term "event" remains as a single concept for all the different kinds of events in Bevy. - Despite all event types being "events", they use fundamentally different APIs. Instead of assuming that you can use an event type with any pattern (when only one is typically supported), you explicitly opt in to each one with dedicated traits. - Using separate traits for each type of event helps with documentation and clearer function signatures. - I can safely make assumptions on expected usage. - If I see that an event is an `EntityEvent`, I can assume that I can use `observe` on it and get targeted events. - If I see that an event is a `BufferedEvent`, I can assume that I can use `EventReader` to read events. - If I see both `EntityEvent` and `BufferedEvent`, I can assume that both APIs are supported. In summary: This allows for a unified concept for events, while limiting the different ways to use them with opt-in traits. No more guess-work involved when using APIs. ### Problems? - Because `BufferedEvent` implements `Event` (for more consistent semantics etc.), you can still use all buffered events for non-targeted observers. I think this is fine/good. The important part is that if you see that an event implements `BufferedEvent`, you know that the `EventReader`/`EventWriter` API should be supported. Whether it *also* supports other APIs is secondary. - I currently only support `trigger_targets` for an `EntityEvent`. However, you can technically target components too, without targeting any entities. I consider that such a niche and advanced use case that it's not a huge problem to only support it for `EntityEvent`s, but we could also split `trigger_targets` into `trigger_entities` and `trigger_components` if we wanted to (or implement components as entities :P). - You can still trigger an `EntityEvent` *without* targets. I consider this correct, since `Event` implements the non-targeted behavior, and it'd be weird if implementing another trait *removed* behavior. However, it does mean that global observers for entity events can technically return `Entity::PLACEHOLDER` again (since I got rid of the `Option<Entity>` added in #19440 for ergonomics). I think that's enough of an edge case that it's not a huge problem, but it is worth keeping in mind. - ~~Deriving both `EntityEvent` and `BufferedEvent` for the same type currently duplicates the `Event` implementation, so you instead need to manually implement one of them.~~ Changed to always requiring `Event` to be derived. ## Related Work There are plans to implement multi-event support for observers, especially for UI contexts. [Cart's example](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14649#issuecomment-2960402508) API looked like this: ```rust // Truncated for brevity trigger: Trigger<( OnAdd<Pressed>, OnRemove<Pressed>, OnAdd<InteractionDisabled>, OnRemove<InteractionDisabled>, OnInsert<Hovered>, )>, ``` I believe this shouldn't be in conflict with this PR. If anything, this PR might *help* achieve the multi-event pattern for entity observers with fewer footguns: by statically enforcing that all of these events are `EntityEvent`s in the context of `EntityCommands::observe`, we can avoid misuse or weird cases where *some* events inside the trigger are targeted while others are not. |
||
|
Joona Aalto
|
e5dc177b4b
|
Rename Trigger to On (#19596)
# Objective
Currently, the observer API looks like this:
```rust
app.add_observer(|trigger: Trigger<Explode>| {
info!("Entity {} exploded!", trigger.target());
});
```
Future plans for observers also include "multi-event observers" with a
trigger that looks like this (see [Cart's
example](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14649#issuecomment-2960402508)):
```rust
trigger: Trigger<(
OnAdd<Pressed>,
OnRemove<Pressed>,
OnAdd<InteractionDisabled>,
OnRemove<InteractionDisabled>,
OnInsert<Hovered>,
)>,
```
In scenarios like this, there is a lot of repetition of `On`. These are
expected to be very high-traffic APIs especially in UI contexts, so
ergonomics and readability are critical.
By renaming `Trigger` to `On`, we can make these APIs read more cleanly
and get rid of the repetition:
```rust
app.add_observer(|trigger: On<Explode>| {
info!("Entity {} exploded!", trigger.target());
});
```
```rust
trigger: On<(
Add<Pressed>,
Remove<Pressed>,
Add<InteractionDisabled>,
Remove<InteractionDisabled>,
Insert<Hovered>,
)>,
```
Names like `On<Add<Pressed>>` emphasize the actual event listener nature
more than `Trigger<OnAdd<Pressed>>`, and look cleaner. This *also* frees
up the `Trigger` name if we want to use it for the observer event type,
splitting them out from buffered events (bikeshedding this is out of
scope for this PR though).
For prior art:
[`bevy_eventlistener`](https://github.com/aevyrie/bevy_eventlistener)
used
[`On`](https://docs.rs/bevy_eventlistener/latest/bevy_eventlistener/event_listener/struct.On.html)
for its event listener type. Though in our case, the observer is the
event listener, and `On` is just a type containing information about the
triggered event.
## Solution
Steal from `bevy_event_listener` by @aevyrie and use `On`.
- Rename `Trigger` to `On`
- Rename `OnAdd` to `Add`
- Rename `OnInsert` to `Insert`
- Rename `OnReplace` to `Replace`
- Rename `OnRemove` to `Remove`
- Rename `OnDespawn` to `Despawn`
## Discussion
### Naming Conflicts??
Using a name like `Add` might initially feel like a very bad idea, since
it risks conflict with `core::ops::Add`. However, I don't expect this to
be a big problem in practice.
- You rarely need to actually implement the `Add` trait, especially in
modules that would use the Bevy ECS.
- In the rare cases where you *do* get a conflict, it is very easy to
fix by just disambiguating, for example using `ops::Add`.
- The `Add` event is a struct while the `Add` trait is a trait (duh), so
the compiler error should be very obvious.
For the record, renaming `OnAdd` to `Add`, I got exactly *zero* errors
or conflicts within Bevy itself. But this is of course not entirely
representative of actual projects *using* Bevy.
You might then wonder, why not use `Added`? This would conflict with the
`Added` query filter, so it wouldn't work. Additionally, the current
naming convention for observer events does not use past tense.
### Documentation
This does make documentation slightly more awkward when referring to
`On` or its methods. Previous docs often referred to `Trigger::target`
or "sends a `Trigger`" (which is... a bit strange anyway), which would
now be `On::target` and "sends an observer `Event`".
You can see the diff in this PR to see some of the effects. I think it
should be fine though, we may just need to reword more documentation to
read better.
|
||
|
Alice Cecile
|
6ddd0f16a8
|
Component lifecycle reorganization and documentation (#19543)
# Objective I set out with one simple goal: clearly document the differences between each of the component lifecycle events via module docs. Unfortunately, no such module existed: the various lifecycle code was scattered to the wind. Without a unified module, it's very hard to discover the related types, and there's nowhere good to put my shiny new documentation. ## Solution 1. Unify the assorted types into a single `bevy_ecs::component_lifecycle` module. 2. Write docs. 3. Write a migration guide. ## Testing Thanks CI! ## Follow-up 1. The lifecycle event names are pretty confusing, especially `OnReplace`. We should consider renaming those. No bikeshedding in my PR though! 2. Observers need real module docs too :( 3. Any additional functional changes should be done elsewhere; this is a simple docs and re-org PR. --------- Co-authored-by: theotherphil <phil.j.ellison@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
7e9d6d852b
|
bevyengine.org -> bevy.org (#19503)
We have acquired [bevy.org](https://bevy.org) and the migration has finished! Meaning we can now update all of the references in this repo. |
||
|
François Mockers
|
7a7bff8c17
|
Hot patching systems with subsecond (#19309)
# Objective - Enable hot patching systems with subsecond - Fixes #19296 ## Solution - First commit is the naive thin layer - Second commit only check the jump table when the code is hot patched instead of on every system execution - Depends on https://github.com/DioxusLabs/dioxus/pull/4153 for a nicer API, but could be done without - Everything in second commit is feature gated, it has no impact when the feature is not enabled ## Testing - Check dependencies without the feature enabled: nothing dioxus in tree - Run the new example: text and color can be changed --------- Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch> Co-authored-by: JMS55 <47158642+JMS55@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Chris Russell
|
571b3ba475
|
Remove ArchetypeComponentId and archetype_component_access (#19143)
# Objective Remove `ArchetypeComponentId` and `archetype_component_access`. Following #16885, they are no longer used by the engine, so we can stop spending time calculating them or space storing them. ## Solution Remove `ArchetypeComponentId` and everything that touches it. The `System::update_archetype_component_access` method no longer needs to update `archetype_component_access`. We do still need to update query caches, but we no longer need to do so *before* running the system. We'd have to touch every caller anyway if we gave the method a better name, so just remove `System::update_archetype_component_access` and `SystemParam::new_archetype` entirely, and update the query cache in `Query::get_param`. The `Single` and `Populated` params also need their query caches updated in `SystemParam::validate_param`, so change `validate_param` to take `&mut Self::State` instead of `&Self::State`. |
||
|
stevehello166
|
c9e69ac65e
|
Rename Condition to SystemCondition` (#19328)
# Objective Fixes #19120 ## Solution Use the find and replace token feature in VSCode to replace all the `Condition`s with `SystemCondition`s. Then look through all the documentation with find and replace to replace all the `Condition`s there. ## Testing - Did you test these changes? If so, how? Yes, used cargo clippy, cargo build and cargo test. - Are there any parts that need more testing? Nope - How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything specific they need to know? By compiling and running bevy - If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are there any important ones you can't test? Shouldn't be, but Fedora Linux with KDE Wayland |
||
|
Eagster
|
12aba64900
|
Make entity generation a new type and remove identifier (#19121)
# Objective This is a followup to #18704 . There's lots more followup work, but this is the minimum to unblock #18670, etc. This direction has been given the green light by Alice [here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/18704#issuecomment-2853368129). ## Solution I could have split this over multiple PRs, but I figured skipping straight here would be easiest for everyone and would unblock things the quickest. This removes the now no longer needed `identifier` module and makes `Entity::generation` go from `NonZeroU32` to `struct EntityGeneration(u32)`. ## Testing CI --------- Co-authored-by: Mark Nokalt <marknokalt@live.com> |
||
|
Eagster
|
0b4858726c
|
Make entity::index non max (#18704)
# Objective There are two problems this aims to solve. First, `Entity::index` is currently a `u32`. That means there are `u32::MAX + 1` possible entities. Not only is that awkward, but it also make `Entity` allocation more difficult. I discovered this while working on remote entity reservation, but even on main, `Entities` doesn't handle the `u32::MAX + 1` entity very well. It can not be batch reserved because that iterator uses exclusive ranges, which has a maximum upper bound of `u32::MAX - 1`. In other words, having `u32::MAX` as a valid index can be thought of as a bug right now. We either need to make that invalid (this PR), which makes Entity allocation cleaner and makes remote reservation easier (because the length only needs to be u32 instead of u64, which, in atomics is a big deal), or we need to take another pass at `Entities` to make it handle the `u32::MAX` index properly. Second, `TableRow`, `ArchetypeRow` and `EntityIndex` (a type alias for u32) all have `u32` as the underlying type. That means using these as the index type in a `SparseSet` uses 64 bits for the sparse list because it stores `Option<IndexType>`. By using `NonMaxU32` here, we cut the memory of that list in half. To my knowledge, `EntityIndex` is the only thing that would really benefit from this niche. `TableRow` and `ArchetypeRow` I think are not stored in an `Option` in bulk. But if they ever are, this would help. Additionally this ensures `TableRow::INVALID` and `ArchetypeRow::INVALID` never conflict with an actual row, which in a nice bonus. As a related note, if we do components as entities where `ComponentId` becomes `Entity`, the the `SparseSet<ComponentId>` will see a similar memory improvement too. ## Solution Create a new type `EntityRow` that wraps `NonMaxU32`, similar to `TableRow` and `ArchetypeRow`. Change `Entity::index` to this type. ## Downsides `NonMax` is implemented as a `NonZero` with a binary inversion. That means accessing and storing the value takes one more instruction. I don't think that's a big deal, but it's worth mentioning. As a consequence, `to_bits` uses `transmute` to skip the inversion which keeps it a nop. But that also means that ordering has now flipped. In other words, higher indices are considered less than lower indices. I don't think that's a problem, but it's also worth mentioning. ## Alternatives We could keep the index as a u32 type and just document that `u32::MAX` is invalid, modifying `Entities` to ensure it never gets handed out. (But that's not enforced by the type system.) We could still take advantage of the niche here in `ComponentSparseSet`. We'd just need some unsafe manual conversions, which is probably fine, but opens up the possibility for correctness problems later. We could change `Entities` to fully support the `u32::MAX` index. (But that makes `Entities` more complex and potentially slightly slower.) ## Testing - CI - A few tests were changed because they depend on different ordering and `to_bits` values. ## Future Work - It might be worth removing the niche on `Entity::generation` since there is now a different niche. - We could move `Entity::generation` into it's own type too for clarity. - We should change `ComponentSparseSet` to take advantage of the new niche. (This PR doesn't change that yet.) - Consider removing or updating `Identifier`. This is only used for `Entity`, so it might be worth combining since `Entity` is now more unique. --------- Co-authored-by: atlv <email@atlasdostal.com> Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au> |
||
|
Zachary Harrold
|
63e78fe489
|
Deprecated Begone! 0.16 Cleanup (#19108)
# Objective A fair few items were deprecated in 0.16. Let's delete them now that we're in the 0.17 development cycle! ## Solution - Deleted items marked deprecated in 0.16. ## Testing - CI --- ## Notes I'm making the assumption that _everything_ deprecated in 0.16 should be removed in 0.17. That may be a false assumption in certain cases. Please check the items to be removed to see if there are any exceptions we should keep around for another cycle! |
||
|
Tim Overbeek
|
60cdefd128
|
Derive clone_behavior for Components (#18811)
Allow Derive(Component) to specify a clone_behavior ```rust #[derive(Component)] #[component(clone_behavior = Ignore)] MyComponent; ``` |
||
|
NiseVoid
|
02d569d0e4
|
Add Allows filter to bypass DefaultQueryFilters (#18192)
# Objective Fixes #17803 ## Solution - Add an `Allows<T>` `QueryFilter` that adds archetypal access for `T` - Fix access merging to include archetypal from both sides ## Testing - Added a case to the unit test for the application of `DefaultQueryFilters` |
||
|
Eagster
|
bfc76c589e
|
Remove insert_or_spawn function family (#18148)
# Objective Based on and closes #18054, this PR builds on #18035 and #18147 to remove: - `Commands::insert_or_spawn_batch` - `Entities::alloc_at_without_replacement` - `Entities::alloc_at` - `entity::AllocAtWithoutReplacement` - `World::insert_or_spawn_batch` - `World::insert_or_spawn_batch_with_caller` ## Testing Just removing unused, deprecated code, so no new tests. Note that as of writing, #18035 is still under testing and review. ## Future Work Per [this](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/18054#issuecomment-2689088899) comment on #18054, there may be additional performance improvements possible to the entity allocator now that `alloc_at` no longer is supported. At a glance, I don't see anything obvious to improve, but it may be worth further investigation in the future. --------- Co-authored-by: JaySpruce <jsprucebruce@gmail.com> |
||
|
Chris Russell
|
d28e4908ca
|
Create a When system param wrapper for skipping systems that fail validation (#18765)
# Objective Create a `When` system param wrapper for skipping systems that fail validation. Currently, the `Single` and `Populated` parameters cause systems to skip when they fail validation, while the `Res` family causes systems to error. Generalize this so that any fallible parameter can be used either to skip a system or to raise an error. A parameter used directly will always raise an error, and a parameter wrapped in `When<P>` will always cause the system to be silently skipped. ~~Note that this changes the behavior for `Single` and `Populated`. The current behavior will be available using `When<Single>` and `When<Populated>`.~~ Fixes #18516 ## Solution Create a `When` system param wrapper that wraps an inner parameter and converts all validation errors to `skipped`. ~~Change the behavior of `Single` and `Populated` to fail by default.~~ ~~Replace in-engine use of `Single` with `When<Single>`. I updated the `fallible_systems` example, but not all of the others. The other examples I looked at appeared to always have one matching entity, and it seemed more clear to use the simpler type in those cases.~~ --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au> Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com> |
||
|
Alice Cecile
|
9254297acd
|
Use never_say_never hack to work around Rust 2024 regression for fn traits (#18804)
# Objective After #17967, closures which always panic no longer satisfy various Bevy traits. Principally, this affects observers, systems and commands. While this may seem pointless (systems which always panic are kind of useless), it is distinctly annoying when using the `todo!` macro, or when writing tests that should panic. Fixes #18778. ## Solution - Add failing tests to demonstrate the problem - Add the trick from [`never_say_never`](https://docs.rs/never-say-never/latest/never_say_never/) to name the `!` type on stable Rust - Write looots of docs explaining what the heck is going on and why we've done this terrible thing ## To do Unfortunately I couldn't figure out how to avoid conflicting impls, and I am out of time for today, the week and uh the week after that. Vacation! If you feel like finishing this for me, please submit PRs to my branch and I can review and press the button for it while I'm off. Unless you're Cart, in which case you have write permissions to my branch! - [ ] fix for commands - [ ] fix for systems - [ ] fix for observers - [ ] revert https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy-website/pull/2092/ ## Testing I've added a compile test for these failure cases and a few adjacent non-failing cases (with explicit return types). --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
e9a0ef49f9
|
Rename bevy_platform_support to bevy_platform (#18813)
# Objective The goal of `bevy_platform_support` is to provide a set of platform agnostic APIs, alongside platform-specific functionality. This is a high traffic crate (providing things like HashMap and Instant). Especially in light of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/18799, it deserves a friendlier / shorter name. Given that it hasn't had a full release yet, getting this change in before Bevy 0.16 makes sense. ## Solution - Rename `bevy_platform_support` to `bevy_platform`. |
||
|
Vic
|
35cfef7cf2
|
Rename EntityBorrow/TrustedEntityBorrow to ContainsEntity/EntityEquivalent (#18470)
# Objective Fixes #9367. Yet another follow-up to #16547. These traits were initially based on `Borrow<Entity>` because that trait was what they were replacing, and it felt close enough in meaning. However, they ultimately don't quite match: `borrow` always returns references, whereas `EntityBorrow` always returns a plain `Entity`. Additionally, `EntityBorrow` can imply that we are borrowing an `Entity` from the ECS, which is not what it does. Due to its safety contract, `TrustedEntityBorrow` is important an important and widely used trait for `EntitySet` functionality. In contrast, the safe `EntityBorrow` does not see much use, because even outside of `EntitySet`-related functionality, it is a better idea to accept `TrustedEntityBorrow` over `EntityBorrow`. Furthermore, as #9367 points out, abstracting over returning `Entity` from pointers/structs that contain it can skip some ergonomic friction. On top of that, there are aspects of #18319 and #18408 that are relevant to naming: We've run into the issue that relying on a type default can switch generic order. This is livable in some contexts, but unacceptable in others. To remedy that, we'd need to switch to a type alias approach: The "defaulted" `Entity` case becomes a `UniqueEntity*`/`Entity*Map`/`Entity*Set` alias, and the base type receives a more general name. `TrustedEntityBorrow` does not mesh clearly with sensible base type names. ## Solution Replace any `EntityBorrow` bounds with `TrustedEntityBorrow`. + Rename them as such: `EntityBorrow` -> `ContainsEntity` `TrustedEntityBorrow` -> `EntityEquivalent` For `EntityBorrow` we produce a change in meaning; We designate it for types that aren't necessarily strict wrappers around `Entity` or some pointer to `Entity`, but rather any of the myriad of types that contain a single associated `Entity`. This pattern can already be seen in the common `entity`/`id` methods across the engine. We do not mean for `ContainsEntity` to be a trait that abstracts input API (like how `AsRef<T>` is often used, f.e.), because eliding `entity()` would be too implicit in the general case. We prefix "Contains" to match the intuition of a struct with an `Entity` field, like some contain a `length` or `capacity`. It gives the impression of structure, which avoids the implication of a relationship to the `ECS`. `HasEntity` f.e. could be interpreted as "a currently live entity", As an input trait for APIs like #9367 envisioned, `TrustedEntityBorrow` is a better fit, because it *does* restrict itself to strict wrappers and pointers. Which is why we replace any `EntityBorrow`/`ContainsEntity` bounds with `TrustedEntityBorrow`/`EntityEquivalent`. Here, the name `EntityEquivalent` is a lot closer to its actual meaning, which is "A type that is both equivalent to an `Entity`, and forms the same total order when compared". Prior art for this is the [`Equivalent`](https://docs.rs/hashbrown/latest/hashbrown/trait.Equivalent.html) trait in `hashbrown`, which utilizes both `Borrow` and `Eq` for its one blanket impl! Given that we lose the `Borrow` moniker, and `Equivalent` can carry various meanings, we expand on the safety comment of `EntityEquivalent` somewhat. That should help prevent the confusion we saw in [#18408](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/18408#issuecomment-2742094176). The new name meshes a lot better with the type aliasing approach in #18408, by aligning with the base name `EntityEquivalentHashMap`. For a consistent scheme among all set types, we can use this scheme for the `UniqueEntity*` wrapper types as well! This allows us to undo the switched generic order that was introduced to `UniqueEntityArray` by its `Entity` default. Even without the type aliases, I think these renames are worth doing! ## Migration Guide Any use of `EntityBorrow` becomes `ContainsEntity`. Any use of `TrustedEntityBorrow` becomes `EntityEquivalent`. |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
538afe2330
|
Improved Require Syntax (#18555)
# Objective Requires are currently more verbose than they need to be. People would like to define inline component values. Additionally, the current `#[require(Foo(custom_constructor))]` and `#[require(Foo(|| Foo(10))]` syntax doesn't really make sense within the context of the Rust type system. #18309 was an attempt to improve ergonomics for some cases, but it came at the cost of even more weirdness / unintuitive behavior. Our approach as a whole needs a rethink. ## Solution Rework the `#[require()]` syntax to make more sense. This is a breaking change, but I think it will make the system easier to learn, while also improving ergonomics substantially: ```rust #[derive(Component)] #[require( A, // this will use A::default() B(1), // inline tuple-struct value C { value: 1 }, // inline named-struct value D::Variant, // inline enum variant E::SOME_CONST, // inline associated const F::new(1), // inline constructor G = returns_g(), // an expression that returns G H = SomethingElse::new(), // expression returns SomethingElse, where SomethingElse: Into<H> )] struct Foo; ``` ## Migration Guide Custom-constructor requires should use the new expression-style syntax: ```rust // before #[derive(Component)] #[require(A(returns_a))] struct Foo; // after #[derive(Component)] #[require(A = returns_a())] struct Foo; ``` Inline-closure-constructor requires should use the inline value syntax where possible: ```rust // before #[derive(Component)] #[require(A(|| A(10))] struct Foo; // after #[derive(Component)] #[require(A(10)] struct Foo; ``` In cases where that is not possible, use the expression-style syntax: ```rust // before #[derive(Component)] #[require(A(|| A(10))] struct Foo; // after #[derive(Component)] #[require(A = A(10)] struct Foo; ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com> |
||
|
Alice Cecile
|
ce7d4e41d6
|
Make system param validation rely on the unified ECS error handling via the GLOBAL_ERROR_HANDLER (#18454)
# Objective There are two related problems here: 1. Users should be able to change the fallback behavior of *all* ECS-based errors in their application by setting the `GLOBAL_ERROR_HANDLER`. See #18351 for earlier work in this vein. 2. The existing solution (#15500) for customizing this behavior is high on boilerplate, not global and adds a great deal of complexity. The consensus is that the default behavior when a parameter fails validation should be set based on the kind of system parameter in question: `Single` / `Populated` should silently skip the system, but `Res` should panic. Setting this behavior at the system level is a bandaid that makes getting to that ideal behavior more painful, and can mask real failures (if a resource is missing but you've ignored a system to make the Single stop panicking you're going to have a bad day). ## Solution I've removed the existing `ParamWarnPolicy`-based configuration, and wired up the `GLOBAL_ERROR_HANDLER`/`default_error_handler` to the various schedule executors to properly plumb through errors . Additionally, I've done a small cleanup pass on the corresponding example. ## Testing I've run the `fallible_params` example, with both the default and a custom global error handler. The former panics (as expected), and the latter spams the error console with warnings 🥲 ## Questions for reviewers 1. Currently, failed system param validation will result in endless console spam. Do you want me to implement a solution for warn_once-style debouncing somehow? 2. Currently, the error reporting for failed system param validation is very limited: all we get is that a system param failed validation and the name of the system. Do you want me to implement improved error reporting by bubbling up errors in this PR? 3. There is broad consensus that the default behavior for failed system param validation should be set on a per-system param basis. Would you like me to implement that in this PR? My gut instinct is that we absolutely want to solve 2 and 3, but it will be much easier to do that work (and review it) if we split the PRs apart. ## Migration Guide `ParamWarnPolicy` and the `WithParamWarnPolicy` have been removed completely. Failures during system param validation are now handled via the `GLOBAL_ERROR_HANDLER`: please see the `bevy_ecs::error` module docs for more information. --------- Co-authored-by: MiniaczQ <xnetroidpl@gmail.com> |
||
|
Joshua Holmes
|
8d9f948684
|
Create new NonSendMarker (#18301)
# Objective Create new `NonSendMarker` that does not depend on `NonSend`. Required, in order to accomplish #17682. In that issue, we are trying to replace `!Send` resources with `thread_local!` in order to unblock the resources-as-components effort. However, when we remove all the `!Send` resources from a system, that allows the system to run on a thread other than the main thread, which is against the design of the system. So this marker gives us the control to require a system to run on the main thread without depending on `!Send` resources. ## Solution Create a new `NonSendMarker` to replace the existing one that does not depend on `NonSend`. ## Testing Other than running tests, I ran a few examples: - `window_resizing` - `wireframe` - `volumetric_fog` (looks so cool) - `rotation` - `button` There is a Mac/iOS-specific change and I do not have a Mac or iOS device to test it. I am doubtful that it would cause any problems for 2 reasons: 1. The change is the same as the non-wasm change which I did test 2. The Pixel Eagle tests run Mac tests But it wouldn't hurt if someone wanted to spin up an example that utilizes the `bevy_render` crate, which is where the Mac/iSO change was. ## Migration Guide If `NonSendMarker` is being used from `bevy_app::prelude::*`, replace it with `bevy_ecs::system::NonSendMarker` or use it from `bevy_ecs::prelude::*`. In addition to that, `NonSendMarker` does not need to be wrapped like so: ```rust fn my_system(_non_send_marker: Option<NonSend<NonSendMarker>>) { ... } ``` Instead, it can be used without any wrappers: ```rust fn my_system(_non_send_marker: NonSendMarker) { ... } ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
a033f1b206
|
Replace VisitEntities with MapEntities (#18432)
# Objective There are currently too many disparate ways to handle entity mapping, especially after #17687. We now have MapEntities, VisitEntities, VisitEntitiesMut, Component::visit_entities, Component::visit_entities_mut. Our only known use case at the moment for these is entity mapping. This means we have significant consolidation potential. Additionally, VisitEntitiesMut cannot be implemented for map-style collections like HashSets, as you cant "just" mutate a `&mut Entity`. Our current approach to Component mapping requires VisitEntitiesMut, meaning this category of entity collection isn't mappable. `MapEntities` is more generally applicable. Additionally, the _existence_ of the blanket From impl on VisitEntitiesMut blocks us from implementing MapEntities for HashSets (or any types we don't own), because the owner could always add a conflicting impl in the future. ## Solution Use `MapEntities` everywhere and remove all "visit entities" usages. * Add `Component::map_entities` * Remove `Component::visit_entities`, `Component::visit_entities_mut`, `VisitEntities`, and `VisitEntitiesMut` * Support deriving `Component::map_entities` in `#[derive(Coomponent)]` * Add `#[derive(MapEntities)]`, and share logic with the `Component::map_entities` derive. * Add `ComponentCloneCtx::queue_deferred`, which is command-like logic that runs immediately after normal clones. Reframe `FromWorld` fallback logic in the "reflect clone" impl to use it. This cuts out a lot of unnecessary work and I think justifies the existence of a pseudo-command interface (given how niche, yet performance sensitive this is). Note that we no longer auto-impl entity mapping for ` IntoIterator<Item = &'a Entity>` types, as this would block our ability to implement cases like `HashMap`. This means the onus is on us (or type authors) to add explicit support for types that should be mappable. Also note that the Component-related changes do not require a migration guide as there hasn't been a release with them yet. ## Migration Guide If you were previously implementing `VisitEntities` or `VisitEntitiesMut` (likely via a derive), instead use `MapEntities`. Those were almost certainly used in the context of Bevy Scenes or reflection via `ReflectMapEntities`. If you have a case that uses `VisitEntities` or `VisitEntitiesMut` directly, where `MapEntities` is not a viable replacement, please let us know! ```rust // before #[derive(VisitEntities, VisitEntitiesMut)] struct Inventory { items: Vec<Entity>, #[visit_entities(ignore)] label: String, } // after #[derive(MapEntities)] struct Inventory { #[entities] items: Vec<Entity>, label: String, } ``` |
||
|
newclarityex
|
ecccd57417
|
Generic system config (#17962)
# Objective Prevents duplicate implementation between IntoSystemConfigs and IntoSystemSetConfigs using a generic, adds a NodeType trait for more config flexibility (opening the door to implement https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14195?). ## Solution Followed writeup by @ItsDoot: https://hackmd.io/@doot/rJeefFHc1x Removes IntoSystemConfigs and IntoSystemSetConfigs, instead using IntoNodeConfigs with generics. ## Testing Pending --- ## Showcase N/A ## Migration Guide SystemSetConfigs -> NodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet> SystemConfigs -> NodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem> IntoSystemSetConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet, M> IntoSystemConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem, M> --------- Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
Eagster
|
246ce590e5
|
Queued component registration (#18173)
# Objective This is an alternative to #17871 and #17701 for tracking issue #18155. This thanks to @maniwani for help with this design. The goal is to enable component ids to be reserved from multiple threads concurrently and with only `&World`. This contributes to assets as entities, read-only query and system parameter initialization, etc. ## What's wrong with #17871 ? In #17871, I used my proposed staging utilities to allow *fully* registering components from any thread concurrently with only `&Components`. However, if we want to pursue components as entities (which is desirable for a great many reasons. See [here](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1346499196655505534) on discord), this staging isn't going to work. After all, if registering a component requires spawning an entity, and spawning an entity requires `&mut World`, it is impossible to register a component fully with only `&World`. ## Solution But what if we don't have to register it all the way? What if it's enough to just know the `ComponentId` it will have once it is registered and to queue it to be registered at a later time? Spoiler alert: That is all we need for these features. Here's the basic design: Queue a registration: 1. Check if it has already been registered. 2. Check if it has already been queued. 3. Reserve a `ComponentId`. 4. Queue the registration at that id. Direct (normal) registration: 1. Check if this registration has been queued. 2. If it has, use the queued registration instead. 3. Otherwise, proceed like normal. Appllying the queue: 1. Pop queued items off one by one. 2. Register them directly. One other change: The whole point of this design over #17871 is to facilitate coupling component registration with the World. To ensure that this would fully work with that, I went ahead and moved the `ComponentId` generator onto the world itself. That stemmed a couple of minor organizational changes (see migration guide). As we do components as entities, we will replace this generator with `Entities`, which lives on `World` too. Doing this move early let me verify the design and will reduce migration headaches in the future. If components as entities is as close as I think it is, I don't think splitting this up into different PRs is worth it. If it is not as close as it is, it might make sense to still do #17871 in the meantime (see the risks section). I'll leave it up to y'all what we end up doing though. ## Risks and Testing The biggest downside of this compared to #17871 is that now we have to deal with correct but invalid `ComponentId`s. They are invalid because the component still isn't registered, but they are correct because, once registered, the component will have exactly that id. However, the only time this becomes a problem is if some code violates safety rules by queuing a registration and using the returned id as if it was valid. As this is a new feature though, nothing in Bevy does this, so no new tests were added for it. When we do use it, I left detailed docs to help mitigate issues here, and we can test those usages. Ex: we will want some tests on using queries initialized from queued registrations. ## Migration Guide Component registration can now be queued with only `&World`. To facilitate this, a few APIs needed to be moved around. The following functions have moved from `Components` to `ComponentsRegistrator`: - `register_component` - `register_component_with_descriptor` - `register_resource_with_descriptor` - `register_non_send` - `register_resource` - `register_required_components_manual` Accordingly, functions in `Bundle` and `Component` now take `ComponentsRegistrator` instead of `Components`. You can obtain `ComponentsRegistrator` from the new `World::components_registrator`. You can obtain `ComponentsQueuedRegistrator` from the new `World::components_queue`, and use it to stage component registration if desired. # Open Question Can we verify that it is enough to queue registration with `&World`? I don't think it would be too difficult to package this up into a `Arc<MyComponentsManager>` type thing if we need to, but keeping this on `&World` certainly simplifies things. If we do need the `Arc`, we'll need to look into partitioning `Entities` for components as entities, so we can keep most of the allocation fast on `World` and only keep a smaller partition in the `Arc`. I'd love an SME on assets as entities to shed some light on this. --------- Co-authored-by: andriyDev <andriydzikh@gmail.com> |
||
|
Eagster
|
79e7f8ae0c
|
Use register_dynamic for merging (#18028)
# Objective I found a bug while working on #17871. When required components are registered, ones that are more specific (smaller inheritance depth) are preferred to others. So, if a ComponentA is already required, but it is registered as required again, it will be updated if and only if the new requirement has a smaller inheritance depth (is more specific). However, this logic was not reflected in merging `RequriedComponents`s together. Hence, for complicated requirement trees, the wrong initializer could be used. ## Solution Re-write merging to work by extending the collection via `require_dynamic` instead of blindly combining the inner storage. ## Testing I created this test to ensure this bug doesn't creep back in. This test fails on main, but passes on this branch. ```rs #[test] fn required_components_inheritance_depth_bias() { #[derive(Component, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Copy, Debug)] struct MyRequired(bool); #[derive(Component, Default)] #[require(MyRequired(|| MyRequired(false)))] struct MiddleMan; #[derive(Component, Default)] #[require(MiddleMan)] struct ConflictingRequire; #[derive(Component, Default)] #[require(MyRequired(|| MyRequired(true)))] struct MyComponent; let mut world = World::new(); let order_a = world .spawn((ConflictingRequire, MyComponent)) .get::<MyRequired>() .cloned(); let order_b = world .spawn((MyComponent, ConflictingRequire)) .get::<MyRequired>() .cloned(); assert_eq!(order_a, Some(MyRequired(true))); assert_eq!(order_b, Some(MyRequired(true))); } ``` Note that when the inheritance depth is 0 (Like if there were no middle man above), the order of the components in the bundle still matters. ## Migration Guide `RequiredComponents::register_dynamic` has been changed to `RequiredComponents::register_dynamic_with`. Old: ```rust required_components.register_dynamic( component_id, component_constructor.clone(), requirement_inheritance_depth, ); ``` New: ```rust required_components.register_dynamic_with( component_id, requirement_inheritance_depth, || component_constructor.clone(), ); ``` This can prevent unnecessary cloning. --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Joona Aalto <jondolf.dev@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
cca5813472
|
BevyError: Bevy's new catch-all error type (#18144)
## Objective Fixes #18092 Bevy's current error type is a simple type alias for `Box<dyn Error + Send + Sync + 'static>`. This largely works as a catch-all error, but it is missing a critical feature: the ability to capture a backtrace at the point that the error occurs. The best way to do this is `anyhow`-style error handling: a new error type that takes advantage of the fact that the `?` `From` conversion happens "inline" to capture the backtrace at the point of the error. ## Solution This PR adds a new `BevyError` type (replacing our old `std::error::Error` type alias), which uses the "from conversion backtrace capture" approach: ```rust fn oh_no() -> Result<(), BevyError> { // this fails with Rust's built in ParseIntError, which // is converted into the catch-all BevyError type let number: usize = "hi".parse()?; println!("parsed {number}"); Ok(()) } ``` This also updates our exported `Result` type alias to default to `BevyError`, meaning you can write this instead: ```rust fn oh_no() -> Result { let number: usize = "hi".parse()?; println!("parsed {number}"); Ok(()) } ``` When a BevyError is encountered in a system, it will use Bevy's default system error handler (which panics by default). BevyError does custom "backtrace filtering" by default, meaning we can cut out the _massive_ amount of "rust internals", "async executor internals", and "bevy system scheduler internals" that show up in backtraces. It also trims out the first generally-unnecssary `From` conversion backtrace lines that make it harder to locate the real error location. The result is a blissfully simple backtrace by default:  The full backtrace can be shown by setting the `BEVY_BACKTRACE=full` environment variable. Non-BevyError panics still use the default Rust backtrace behavior. One issue that prevented the truly noise-free backtrace during panics that you see above is that Rust's default panic handler will print the unfiltered (and largely unhelpful real-panic-point) backtrace by default, in _addition_ to our filtered BevyError backtrace (with the helpful backtrace origin) that we capture and print. To resolve this, I have extended Bevy's existing PanicHandlerPlugin to wrap the default panic handler. If we panic from the result of a BevyError, we will skip the default "print full backtrace" panic handler. This behavior can be enabled and disabled using the new `error_panic_hook` cargo feature in `bevy_app` (which is enabled by default). One downside to _not_ using `Box<dyn Error>` directly is that we can no longer take advantage of the built-in `Into` impl for strings to errors. To resolve this, I have added the following: ```rust // Before Err("some error")? // After Err(BevyError::message("some error"))? ``` We can discuss adding shorthand methods or macros for this (similar to anyhow's `anyhow!("some error")` macro), but I'd prefer to discuss that later. I have also added the following extension method: ```rust // Before some_option.ok_or("some error")?; // After some_option.ok_or_message("some error")?; ``` I've also moved all of our existing error infrastructure from `bevy_ecs::result` to `bevy_ecs::error`, as I think that is the better home for it ## Why not anyhow (or eyre)? The biggest reason is that `anyhow` needs to be a "generically useful error type", whereas Bevy is a much narrower scope. By using our own error, we can be significantly more opinionated. For example, anyhow doesn't do the extensive (and invasive) backtrace filtering that BevyError does because it can't operate on Bevy-specific context, and needs to be generically useful. Bevy also has a lot of operational context (ex: system info) that could be useful to attach to errors. If we have control over the error type, we can add whatever context we want to in a structured way. This could be increasingly useful as we add more visual / interactive error handling tools and editor integrations. Additionally, the core approach used is simple and requires almost no code. anyhow clocks in at ~2500 lines of code, but the impl here uses 160. We are able to boil this down to exactly what we need, and by doing so we improve our compile times and the understandability of our code. |
||
|
Eagster
|
ed7b366b24
|
Deprecate insert_or_spawn function family (#18147)
# Objective Based on #18054, this PR builds on #18035 to deprecate: - `Commands::insert_or_spawn_batch` - `Entities::alloc_at_without_replacement` - `Entities::alloc_at` - `World::insert_or_spawn_batch` - `World::insert_or_spawn_batch_with_caller` ## Testing Just deprecation, so no new tests. Note that as of writing #18035 is still under testing and review. ## Open Questions - [x] Should `entity::AllocAtWithoutReplacement` be deprecated? It is internal and only used in `Entities::alloc_at_without_replacement`. **EDIT:** Now deprecated. ## Migration Guide The following functions have been deprecated: - `Commands::insert_or_spawn_batch` - `World::insert_or_spawn_batch` - `World::insert_or_spawn_batch_with_caller` These functions, when used incorrectly, can cause major performance problems and are generally viewed as anti-patterns and foot guns. These are planned to be removed altogether in 0.17. Instead of these functions consider doing one of the following: Option A) Instead of despawing entities and re-spawning them at a particular id, insert the new `Disabled` component without despawning the entity, and use `try_insert_batch` or `insert_batch` and remove `Disabled` instead of re-spawning it. Option B) Instead of giving special meaning to an entity id, simply use `spawn_batch` and ensure entity references are valid when despawning. --------- Co-authored-by: JaySpruce <jsprucebruce@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
06cb5c5fd9
|
Fix Component require() IDE integration (#18165)
# Objective Component `require()` IDE integration is fully broken, as of #16575. ## Solution This reverts us back to the previous "put the docs on Component trait" impl. This _does_ reduce the accessibility of the required components in rust docs, but the complete erasure of "required component IDE experience" is not worth the price of slightly increased prominence of requires in docs. Additionally, Rust Analyzer has recently started including derive attributes in suggestions, so we aren't losing that benefit of the proc_macro attribute impl. |
||
|
Zachary Harrold
|
5241e09671
|
Upgrade to Rust Edition 2024 (#17967)
# Objective - Fixes #17960 ## Solution - Followed the [edition upgrade guide](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/editions/transitioning-an-existing-project-to-a-new-edition.html) ## Testing - CI --- ## Summary of Changes ### Documentation Indentation When using lists in documentation, proper indentation is now linted for. This means subsequent lines within the same list item must start at the same indentation level as the item. ```rust /* Valid */ /// - Item 1 /// Run-on sentence. /// - Item 2 struct Foo; /* Invalid */ /// - Item 1 /// Run-on sentence. /// - Item 2 struct Foo; ``` ### Implicit `!` to `()` Conversion `!` (the never return type, returned by `panic!`, etc.) no longer implicitly converts to `()`. This is particularly painful for systems with `todo!` or `panic!` statements, as they will no longer be functions returning `()` (or `Result<()>`), making them invalid systems for functions like `add_systems`. The ideal fix would be to accept functions returning `!` (or rather, _not_ returning), but this is blocked on the [stabilisation of the `!` type itself](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.never.html), which is not done. The "simple" fix would be to add an explicit `-> ()` to system signatures (e.g., `|| { todo!() }` becomes `|| -> () { todo!() }`). However, this is _also_ banned, as there is an existing lint which (IMO, incorrectly) marks this as an unnecessary annotation. So, the "fix" (read: workaround) is to put these kinds of `|| -> ! { ... }` closuers into variables and give the variable an explicit type (e.g., `fn()`). ```rust // Valid let system: fn() = || todo!("Not implemented yet!"); app.add_systems(..., system); // Invalid app.add_systems(..., || todo!("Not implemented yet!")); ``` ### Temporary Variable Lifetimes The order in which temporary variables are dropped has changed. The simple fix here is _usually_ to just assign temporaries to a named variable before use. ### `gen` is a keyword We can no longer use the name `gen` as it is reserved for a future generator syntax. This involved replacing uses of the name `gen` with `r#gen` (the raw-identifier syntax). ### Formatting has changed Use statements have had the order of imports changed, causing a substantial +/-3,000 diff when applied. For now, I have opted-out of this change by amending `rustfmt.toml` ```toml style_edition = "2021" ``` This preserves the original formatting for now, reducing the size of this PR. It would be a simple followup to update this to 2024 and run `cargo fmt`. ### New `use<>` Opt-Out Syntax Lifetimes are now implicitly included in RPIT types. There was a handful of instances where it needed to be added to satisfy the borrow checker, but there may be more cases where it _should_ be added to avoid breakages in user code. ### `MyUnitStruct { .. }` is an invalid pattern Previously, you could match against unit structs (and unit enum variants) with a `{ .. }` destructuring. This is no longer valid. ### Pretty much every use of `ref` and `mut` are gone Pattern binding has changed to the point where these terms are largely unused now. They still serve a purpose, but it is far more niche now. ### `iter::repeat(...).take(...)` is bad New lint recommends using the more explicit `iter::repeat_n(..., ...)` instead. ## Migration Guide The lifetimes of functions using return-position impl-trait (RPIT) are likely _more_ conservative than they had been previously. If you encounter lifetime issues with such a function, please create an issue to investigate the addition of `+ use<...>`. ## Notes - Check the individual commits for a clearer breakdown for what _actually_ changed. --------- Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
ea578415e1
|
Improved Spawn APIs and Bundle Effects (#17521)
## Objective
A major critique of Bevy at the moment is how boilerplatey it is to
compose (and read) entity hierarchies:
```rust
commands
.spawn(Foo)
.with_children(|p| {
p.spawn(Bar).with_children(|p| {
p.spawn(Baz);
});
p.spawn(Bar).with_children(|p| {
p.spawn(Baz);
});
});
```
There is also currently no good way to statically define and return an
entity hierarchy from a function. Instead, people often do this
"internally" with a Commands function that returns nothing, making it
impossible to spawn the hierarchy in other cases (direct World spawns,
ChildSpawner, etc).
Additionally, because this style of API results in creating the
hierarchy bits _after_ the initial spawn of a bundle, it causes ECS
archetype changes (and often expensive table moves).
Because children are initialized after the fact, we also can't count
them to pre-allocate space. This means each time a child inserts itself,
it has a high chance of overflowing the currently allocated capacity in
the `RelationshipTarget` collection, causing literal worst-case
reallocations.
We can do better!
## Solution
The Bundle trait has been extended to support an optional
`BundleEffect`. This is applied directly to World immediately _after_
the Bundle has fully inserted. Note that this is
[intentionally](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/16920)
_not done via a deferred Command_, which would require repeatedly
copying each remaining subtree of the hierarchy to a new command as we
walk down the tree (_not_ good performance).
This allows us to implement the new `SpawnRelated` trait for all
`RelationshipTarget` impls, which looks like this in practice:
```rust
world.spawn((
Foo,
Children::spawn((
Spawn((
Bar,
Children::spawn(Spawn(Baz)),
)),
Spawn((
Bar,
Children::spawn(Spawn(Baz)),
)),
))
))
```
`Children::spawn` returns `SpawnRelatedBundle<Children, L:
SpawnableList>`, which is a `Bundle` that inserts `Children`
(preallocated to the size of the `SpawnableList::size_hint()`).
`Spawn<B: Bundle>(pub B)` implements `SpawnableList` with a size of 1.
`SpawnableList` is also implemented for tuples of `SpawnableList` (same
general pattern as the Bundle impl).
There are currently three built-in `SpawnableList` implementations:
```rust
world.spawn((
Foo,
Children::spawn((
Spawn(Name::new("Child1")),
SpawnIter(["Child2", "Child3"].into_iter().map(Name::new),
SpawnWith(|parent: &mut ChildSpawner| {
parent.spawn(Name::new("Child4"));
parent.spawn(Name::new("Child5"));
})
)),
))
```
We get the benefits of "structured init", but we have nice flexibility
where it is required!
Some readers' first instinct might be to try to remove the need for the
`Spawn` wrapper. This is impossible in the Rust type system, as a tuple
of "child Bundles to be spawned" and a "tuple of Components to be added
via a single Bundle" is ambiguous in the Rust type system. There are two
ways to resolve that ambiguity:
1. By adding support for variadics to the Rust type system (removing the
need for nested bundles). This is out of scope for this PR :)
2. Using wrapper types to resolve the ambiguity (this is what I did in
this PR).
For the single-entity spawn cases, `Children::spawn_one` does also
exist, which removes the need for the wrapper:
```rust
world.spawn((
Foo,
Children::spawn_one(Bar),
))
```
## This works for all Relationships
This API isn't just for `Children` / `ChildOf` relationships. It works
for any relationship type, and they can be mixed and matched!
```rust
world.spawn((
Foo,
Observers::spawn((
Spawn(Observer::new(|trigger: Trigger<FuseLit>| {})),
Spawn(Observer::new(|trigger: Trigger<Exploded>| {})),
)),
OwnerOf::spawn(Spawn(Bar))
Children::spawn(Spawn(Baz))
))
```
## Macros
While `Spawn` is necessary to satisfy the type system, we _can_ remove
the need to express it via macros. The example above can be expressed
more succinctly using the new `children![X]` macro, which internally
produces `Children::spawn(Spawn(X))`:
```rust
world.spawn((
Foo,
children![
(
Bar,
children![Baz],
),
(
Bar,
children![Baz],
),
]
))
```
There is also a `related!` macro, which is a generic version of the
`children!` macro that supports any relationship type:
```rust
world.spawn((
Foo,
related!(Children[
(
Bar,
related!(Children[Baz]),
),
(
Bar,
related!(Children[Baz]),
),
])
))
```
## Returning Hierarchies from Functions
Thanks to these changes, the following pattern is now possible:
```rust
fn button(text: &str, color: Color) -> impl Bundle {
(
Node {
width: Val::Px(300.),
height: Val::Px(100.),
..default()
},
BackgroundColor(color),
children![
Text::new(text),
]
)
}
fn ui() -> impl Bundle {
(
Node {
width: Val::Percent(100.0),
height: Val::Percent(100.0),
..default(),
},
children![
button("hello", BLUE),
button("world", RED),
]
)
}
// spawn from a system
fn system(mut commands: Commands) {
commands.spawn(ui());
}
// spawn directly on World
world.spawn(ui());
```
## Additional Changes and Notes
* `Bundle::from_components` has been split out into
`BundleFromComponents::from_components`, enabling us to implement
`Bundle` for types that cannot be "taken" from the ECS (such as the new
`SpawnRelatedBundle`).
* The `NoBundleEffect` trait (which implements `BundleEffect`) is
implemented for empty tuples (and tuples of empty tuples), which allows
us to constrain APIs to only accept bundles that do not have effects.
This is critical because the current batch spawn APIs cannot efficiently
apply BundleEffects in their current form (as doing so in-place could
invalidate the cached raw pointers). We could consider allocating a
buffer of the effects to be applied later, but that does have
performance implications that could offset the balance and value of the
batched APIs (and would likely require some refactors to the underlying
code). I've decided to be conservative here. We can consider relaxing
that requirement on those APIs later, but that should be done in a
followup imo.
* I've ported a few examples to illustrate real-world usage. I think in
a followup we should port all examples to the `children!` form whenever
possible (and for cases that require things like SpawnIter, use the raw
APIs).
* Some may ask "why not use the `Relationship` to spawn (ex:
`ChildOf::spawn(Foo)`) instead of the `RelationshipTarget` (ex:
`Children::spawn(Spawn(Foo))`)?". That _would_ allow us to remove the
`Spawn` wrapper. I've explicitly chosen to disallow this pattern.
`Bundle::Effect` has the ability to create _significant_ weirdness.
Things in `Bundle` position look like components. For example
`world.spawn((Foo, ChildOf::spawn(Bar)))` _looks and reads_ like Foo is
a child of Bar. `ChildOf` is in Foo's "component position" but it is not
a component on Foo. This is a huge problem. Now that `Bundle::Effect`
exists, we should be _very_ principled about keeping the "weird and
unintuitive behavior" to a minimum. Things that read like components
_should be the components they appear to be".
## Remaining Work
* The macros are currently trivially implemented using macro_rules and
are currently limited to the max tuple length. They will require a
proc_macro implementation to work around the tuple length limit.
## Next Steps
* Port the remaining examples to use `children!` where possible and raw
`Spawn` / `SpawnIter` / `SpawnWith` where the flexibility of the raw API
is required.
## Migration Guide
Existing spawn patterns will continue to work as expected.
Manual Bundle implementations now require a `BundleEffect` associated
type. Exisiting bundles would have no bundle effect, so use `()`.
Additionally `Bundle::from_components` has been moved to the new
`BundleFromComponents` trait.
```rust
// Before
unsafe impl Bundle for X {
unsafe fn from_components<T, F>(ctx: &mut T, func: &mut F) -> Self {
}
/* remaining bundle impl here */
}
// After
unsafe impl Bundle for X {
type Effect = ();
/* remaining bundle impl here */
}
unsafe impl BundleFromComponents for X {
unsafe fn from_components<T, F>(ctx: &mut T, func: &mut F) -> Self {
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Emerson Coskey <emerson@coskey.dev>
|
||
|
raldone01
|
1b7db895b7
|
Harden proc macro path resolution and add integration tests. (#17330)
This pr uses the `extern crate self as` trick to make proc macros behave the same way inside and outside bevy. # Objective - Removes noise introduced by `crate as` in the whole bevy repo. - Fixes #17004. - Hardens proc macro path resolution. ## TODO - [x] `BevyManifest` needs cleanup. - [x] Cleanup remaining `crate as`. - [x] Add proper integration tests to the ci. ## Notes - `cargo-manifest-proc-macros` is written by me and based/inspired by the old `BevyManifest` implementation and [`bkchr/proc-macro-crate`](https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate). - What do you think about the new integration test machinery I added to the `ci`? More and better integration tests can be added at a later stage. The goal of these integration tests is to simulate an actual separate crate that uses bevy. Ideally they would lightly touch all bevy crates. ## Testing - Needs RA test - Needs testing from other users - Others need to run at least `cargo run -p ci integration-test` and verify that they work. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
3c8fae2390
|
Improved Entity Mapping and Cloning (#17687)
Fixes #17535 Bevy's approach to handling "entity mapping" during spawning and cloning needs some work. The addition of [Relations](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/17398) both [introduced a new "duplicate entities" bug when spawning scenes in the scene system](#17535) and made the weaknesses of the current mapping system exceedingly clear: 1. Entity mapping requires _a ton_ of boilerplate (implement or derive VisitEntities and VisitEntitesMut, then register / reflect MapEntities). Knowing the incantation is challenging and if you forget to do it in part or in whole, spawning subtly breaks. 2. Entity mapping a spawned component in scenes incurs unnecessary overhead: look up ReflectMapEntities, create a _brand new temporary instance_ of the component using FromReflect, map the entities in that instance, and then apply that on top of the actual component using reflection. We can do much better. Additionally, while our new [Entity cloning system](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/16132) is already pretty great, it has some areas we can make better: * It doesn't expose semantic info about the clone (ex: ignore or "clone empty"), meaning we can't key off of that in places where it would be useful, such as scene spawning. Rather than duplicating this info across contexts, I think it makes more sense to add that info to the clone system, especially given that we'd like to use cloning code in some of our spawning scenarios. * EntityCloner is currently built in a way that prioritizes a single entity clone * EntityCloner's recursive cloning is built to be done "inside out" in a parallel context (queue commands that each have a clone of EntityCloner). By making EntityCloner the orchestrator of the clone we can remove internal arcs, improve the clarity of the code, make EntityCloner mutable again, and simplify the builder code. * EntityCloner does not currently take into account entity mapping. This is necessary to do true "bullet proof" cloning, would allow us to unify the per-component scene spawning and cloning UX, and ultimately would allow us to use EntityCloner in place of raw reflection for scenes like `Scene(World)` (which would give us a nice performance boost: fewer archetype moves, less reflection overhead). ## Solution ### Improved Entity Mapping First, components now have first-class "entity visiting and mapping" behavior: ```rust #[derive(Component, Reflect)] #[reflect(Component)] struct Inventory { size: usize, #[entities] items: Vec<Entity>, } ``` Any field with the `#[entities]` annotation will be viewable and mappable when cloning and spawning scenes. Compare that to what was required before! ```rust #[derive(Component, Reflect, VisitEntities, VisitEntitiesMut)] #[reflect(Component, MapEntities)] struct Inventory { #[visit_entities(ignore)] size: usize, items: Vec<Entity>, } ``` Additionally, for relationships `#[entities]` is implied, meaning this "just works" in scenes and cloning: ```rust #[derive(Component, Reflect)] #[relationship(relationship_target = Children)] #[reflect(Component)] struct ChildOf(pub Entity); ``` Note that Component _does not_ implement `VisitEntities` directly. Instead, it has `Component::visit_entities` and `Component::visit_entities_mut` methods. This is for a few reasons: 1. We cannot implement `VisitEntities for C: Component` because that would conflict with our impl of VisitEntities for anything that implements `IntoIterator<Item=Entity>`. Preserving that impl is more important from a UX perspective. 2. We should not implement `Component: VisitEntities` VisitEntities in the Component derive, as that would increase the burden of manual Component trait implementors. 3. Making VisitEntitiesMut directly callable for components would make it easy to invalidate invariants defined by a component author. By putting it in the `Component` impl, we can make it harder to call naturally / unavailable to autocomplete using `fn visit_entities_mut(this: &mut Self, ...)`. `ReflectComponent::apply_or_insert` is now `ReflectComponent::apply_or_insert_mapped`. By moving mapping inside this impl, we remove the need to go through the reflection system to do entity mapping, meaning we no longer need to create a clone of the target component, map the entities in that component, and patch those values on top. This will make spawning mapped entities _much_ faster (The default `Component::visit_entities_mut` impl is an inlined empty function, so it will incur no overhead for unmapped entities). ### The Bug Fix To solve #17535, spawning code now skips entities with the new `ComponentCloneBehavior::Ignore` and `ComponentCloneBehavior::RelationshipTarget` variants (note RelationshipTarget is a temporary "workaround" variant that allows scenes to skip these components. This is a temporary workaround that can be removed as these cases should _really_ be using EntityCloner logic, which should be done in a followup PR. When that is done, `ComponentCloneBehavior::RelationshipTarget` can be merged into the normal `ComponentCloneBehavior::Custom`). ### Improved Cloning * `Option<ComponentCloneHandler>` has been replaced by `ComponentCloneBehavior`, which encodes additional intent and context (ex: `Default`, `Ignore`, `Custom`, `RelationshipTarget` (this last one is temporary)). * Global per-world entity cloning configuration has been removed. This felt overly complicated, increased our API surface, and felt too generic. Each clone context can have different requirements (ex: what a user wants in a specific system, what a scene spawner wants, etc). I'd prefer to see how far context-specific EntityCloners get us first. * EntityCloner's internals have been reworked to remove Arcs and make it mutable. * EntityCloner is now directly stored on EntityClonerBuilder, simplifying the code somewhat * EntityCloner's "bundle scratch" pattern has been moved into the new BundleScratch type, improving its usability and making it usable in other contexts (such as future cross-world cloning code). Currently this is still private, but with some higher level safe APIs it could be used externally for making dynamic bundles * EntityCloner's recursive cloning behavior has been "externalized". It is now responsible for orchestrating recursive clones, meaning it no longer needs to be sharable/clone-able across threads / read-only. * EntityCloner now does entity mapping during clones, like scenes do. This gives behavior parity and also makes it more generically useful. * `RelatonshipTarget::RECURSIVE_SPAWN` is now `RelationshipTarget::LINKED_SPAWN`, and this field is used when cloning relationship targets to determine if cloning should happen recursively. The new `LINKED_SPAWN` term was picked to make it more generically applicable across spawning and cloning scenarios. ## Next Steps * I think we should adapt EntityCloner to support cross world cloning. I think this PR helps set the stage for that by making the internals slightly more generalized. We could have a CrossWorldEntityCloner that reuses a lot of this infrastructure. * Once we support cross world cloning, we should use EntityCloner to spawn `Scene(World)` scenes. This would yield significant performance benefits (no archetype moves, less reflection overhead). --------- Co-authored-by: eugineerd <70062110+eugineerd@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
ElliottjPierce
|
1b2cf7d6cd
|
Isolate component registration (#17671)
# Objective Progresses #17569. The end goal here is to synchronize component registration. See the other PR for details for the motivation behind that. For this PR specifically, the objective is to decouple `Components` from `Storages`. What components are registered etc should have nothing to do with what Storages looks like. Storages should only care about what entity archetypes have been spawned. ## Solution Previously, this was used to create sparse sets for relevant components when those components were registered. Now, we do that when the component is inserted/spawned. This PR proposes doing that in `BundleInfo::new`, but there may be a better place. ## Testing In theory, this shouldn't have changed any functionality, so no new tests were created. I'm not aware of any examples that make heavy use of sparse set components either. ## Migration Guide - Remove storages from functions where it is no longer needed. - Note that SparseSets are no longer present for all registered sparse set components, only those that have been spawned. --------- Co-authored-by: SpecificProtagonist <vincentjunge@posteo.net> Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
NiseVoid
|
62285a47ba
|
Add simple Disabled marker (#17514)
# Objective We have default query filters now, but there is no first-party marker for entity disabling yet Fixes #17458 ## Solution Add the marker, cool recursive features and/or potential hook changes should be follow up work ## Testing Added a unit test to check that the new marker is enabled by default |
||
|
ElliottjPierce
|
361397fcac
|
Add a test for direct recursion in required components. (#17626)
I realized there wasn't a test for this yet and figured it would be trivial to add. Why not? Unless there was a test for this, and I just missed it? I appreciate the unique error message it gives and wanted to make sure it doesn't get broken at some point. Or worse, endlessly recurse. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
Zachary Harrold
|
9bc0ae33c3
|
Move hashbrown and foldhash out of bevy_utils (#17460)
# Objective - Contributes to #16877 ## Solution - Moved `hashbrown`, `foldhash`, and related types out of `bevy_utils` and into `bevy_platform_support` - Refactored the above to match the layout of these types in `std`. - Updated crates as required. ## Testing - CI --- ## Migration Guide - The following items were moved out of `bevy_utils` and into `bevy_platform_support::hash`: - `FixedState` - `DefaultHasher` - `RandomState` - `FixedHasher` - `Hashed` - `PassHash` - `PassHasher` - `NoOpHash` - The following items were moved out of `bevy_utils` and into `bevy_platform_support::collections`: - `HashMap` - `HashSet` - `bevy_utils::hashbrown` has been removed. Instead, import from `bevy_platform_support::collections` _or_ take a dependency on `hashbrown` directly. - `bevy_utils::Entry` has been removed. Instead, import from `bevy_platform_support::collections::hash_map` or `bevy_platform_support::collections::hash_set` as appropriate. - All of the above equally apply to `bevy::utils` and `bevy::platform_support`. ## Notes - I left `PreHashMap`, `PreHashMapExt`, and `TypeIdMap` in `bevy_utils` as they might be candidates for micro-crating. They can always be moved into `bevy_platform_support` at a later date if desired. |
||
|
Zachary Harrold
|
41e79ae826
|
Refactored ComponentHook Parameters into HookContext (#17503)
# Objective
- Make the function signature for `ComponentHook` less verbose
## Solution
- Refactored `Entity`, `ComponentId`, and `Option<&Location>` into a new
`HookContext` struct.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
Update the function signatures for your component hooks to only take 2
arguments, `world` and `context`. Note that because `HookContext` is
plain data with all members public, you can use de-structuring to
simplify migration.
```rust
// Before
fn my_hook(
mut world: DeferredWorld,
entity: Entity,
component_id: ComponentId,
) { ... }
// After
fn my_hook(
mut world: DeferredWorld,
HookContext { entity, component_id, caller }: HookContext,
) { ... }
```
Likewise, if you were discarding certain parameters, you can use `..` in
the de-structuring:
```rust
// Before
fn my_hook(
mut world: DeferredWorld,
entity: Entity,
_: ComponentId,
) { ... }
// After
fn my_hook(
mut world: DeferredWorld,
HookContext { entity, .. }: HookContext,
) { ... }
```
|
||
|
SpecificProtagonist
|
f32a6fb205
|
Track callsite for observers & hooks (#15607)
# Objective Fixes #14708 Also fixes some commands not updating tracked location. ## Solution `ObserverTrigger` has a new `caller` field with the `track_change_detection` feature; hooks take an additional caller parameter (which is `Some(…)` or `None` depending on the feature). ## Testing See the new tests in `src/observer/mod.rs` --- ## Showcase Observers now know from where they were triggered (if `track_change_detection` is enabled): ```rust world.observe(move |trigger: Trigger<OnAdd, Foo>| { println!("Added Foo from {}", trigger.caller()); }); ``` ## Migration - hooks now take an additional `Option<&'static Location>` argument --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
JaySpruce
|
fe24652cc0
|
Change World::try_despawn and World::try_insert_batch to return Result (#17376)
## Objective Most `try` methods on `World` return a `Result`, but `try_despawn` and `try_insert_batch` don't. Since Bevy's error handling is advancing, these should be brought in line. ## Solution - Added `TryDespawnError` and `TryInsertBatchError`. - `try_despawn`, `try_insert_batch`, and `try_insert_batch_if_new` now return their respective errors. - Fixed slightly incorrect behavior in `try_insert_batch_with_caller`. - The method was always meant to continue with the rest of the batch if an entity was missing, but that only worked after the first entity; if the first entity was missing, the method would exit early. This has been resolved. ## Migration Guide - `World::try_despawn` now returns a `Result` rather than a `bool`. - `World::try_insert_batch` and `World::try_insert_batch_if_new` now return a `Result` where they previously returned nothing. |
||
|
Alice Cecile
|
44ad3bf62b
|
Move Resource trait to its own file (#17469)
# Objective `bevy_ecs`'s `system` module is something of a grab bag, and *very* large. This is particularly true for the `system_param` module, which is more than 2k lines long! While it could be defensible to put `Res` and `ResMut` there (lol no they're in change_detection.rs, obviously), it doesn't make any sense to put the `Resource` trait there. This is confusing to navigate (and painful to work on and review). ## Solution - Create a root level `bevy_ecs/resource.rs` module to mirror `bevy_ecs/component.rs` - move the `Resource` trait to that module - move the `Resource` derive macro to that module as well (Rust really likes when you pun on the names of the derive macro and trait and put them in the same path) - fix all of the imports ## Notes to reviewers - We could probably move more stuff into here, but I wanted to keep this PR as small as possible given the absurd level of import changes. - This PR is ground work for my upcoming attempts to store resource data on components (resources-as-entities). Splitting this code out will make the work and review a bit easier, and is the sort of overdue refactor that's good to do as part of more meaningful work. ## Testing cargo build works! ## Migration Guide `bevy_ecs::system::Resource` has been moved to `bevy_ecs::resource::Resource`. |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
ba5e71f53d
|
Parent -> ChildOf (#17427)
Fixes #17412 ## Objective `Parent` uses the "has a X" naming convention. There is increasing sentiment that we should use the "is a X" naming convention for relationships (following #17398). This leaves `Children` as-is because there is prevailing sentiment that `Children` is clearer than `ParentOf` in many cases (especially when treating it like a collection). This renames `Parent` to `ChildOf`. This is just the implementation PR. To discuss the path forward, do so in #17412. ## Migration Guide - The `Parent` component has been renamed to `ChildOf`. |
||
|
NiseVoid
|
de5486725d
|
Add DefaultQueryFilters (#13120)
# Objective Some usecases in the ecosystems are blocked by the inability to stop bevy internals and third party plugins from touching their entities. However the specifics of a general purpose entity disabling system are controversial and further complicated by hierarchies. We can partially unblock these usecases with an opt-in approach: default query filters. ## Solution - Introduce DefaultQueryFilters, these filters are automatically applied to queries that don't otherwise mention the filtered component. - End users and third party plugins can register default filters and are responsible for handling entities they have hidden this way. - Extra features can be left for after user feedback - The default value could later include official ways to hide entities --- ## Changelog - Add DefaultQueryFilters |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
21f1e3045c
|
Relationships (non-fragmenting, one-to-many) (#17398)
This adds support for one-to-many non-fragmenting relationships (with planned paths for fragmenting and non-fragmenting many-to-many relationships). "Non-fragmenting" means that entities with the same relationship type, but different relationship targets, are not forced into separate tables (which would cause "table fragmentation"). Functionally, this fills a similar niche as the current Parent/Children system. The biggest differences are: 1. Relationships have simpler internals and significantly improved performance and UX. Commands and specialized APIs are no longer necessary to keep everything in sync. Just spawn entities with the relationship components you want and everything "just works". 2. Relationships are generalized. Bevy can provide additional built in relationships, and users can define their own. **REQUEST TO REVIEWERS**: _please don't leave top level comments and instead comment on specific lines of code. That way we can take advantage of threaded discussions. Also dont leave comments simply pointing out CI failures as I can read those just fine._ ## Built on top of what we have Relationships are implemented on top of the Bevy ECS features we already have: components, immutability, and hooks. This makes them immediately compatible with all of our existing (and future) APIs for querying, spawning, removing, scenes, reflection, etc. The fewer specialized APIs we need to build, maintain, and teach, the better. ## Why focus on one-to-many non-fragmenting first? 1. This allows us to improve Parent/Children relationships immediately, in a way that is reasonably uncontroversial. Switching our hierarchy to fragmenting relationships would have significant performance implications. ~~Flecs is heavily considering a switch to non-fragmenting relations after careful considerations of the performance tradeoffs.~~ _(Correction from @SanderMertens: Flecs is implementing non-fragmenting storage specialized for asset hierarchies, where asset hierarchies are many instances of small trees that have a well defined structure)_ 2. Adding generalized one-to-many relationships is currently a priority for the [Next Generation Scene / UI effort](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437). Specifically, we're interested in building reactions and observers on top. ## The changes This PR does the following: 1. Adds a generic one-to-many Relationship system 3. Ports the existing Parent/Children system to Relationships, which now lives in `bevy_ecs::hierarchy`. The old `bevy_hierarchy` crate has been removed. 4. Adds on_despawn component hooks 5. Relationships can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior, meaning that the entire relationship hierarchy is despawned when `entity.despawn()` is called. The built in Parent/Children hierarchies enable this behavior, and `entity.despawn_recursive()` has been removed. 6. `world.spawn` now applies commands after spawning. This ensures that relationship bookkeeping happens immediately and removes the need to manually flush. This is in line with the equivalent behaviors recently added to the other APIs (ex: insert). 7. Removes the ValidParentCheckPlugin (system-driven / poll based) in favor of a `validate_parent_has_component` hook. ## Using Relationships The `Relationship` trait looks like this: ```rust pub trait Relationship: Component + Sized { type RelationshipSources: RelationshipSources<Relationship = Self>; fn get(&self) -> Entity; fn from(entity: Entity) -> Self; } ``` A relationship is a component that: 1. Is a simple wrapper over a "target" Entity. 2. Has a corresponding `RelationshipSources` component, which is a simple wrapper over a collection of entities. Every "target entity" targeted by a "source entity" with a `Relationship` has a `RelationshipSources` component, which contains every "source entity" that targets it. For example, the `Parent` component (as it currently exists in Bevy) is the `Relationship` component and the entity containing the Parent is the "source entity". The entity _inside_ the `Parent(Entity)` component is the "target entity". And that target entity has a `Children` component (which implements `RelationshipSources`). In practice, the Parent/Children relationship looks like this: ```rust #[derive(Relationship)] #[relationship(relationship_sources = Children)] pub struct Parent(pub Entity); #[derive(RelationshipSources)] #[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent)] pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>); ``` The Relationship and RelationshipSources derives automatically implement Component with the relevant configuration (namely, the hooks necessary to keep everything in sync). The most direct way to add relationships is to spawn entities with relationship components: ```rust let a = world.spawn_empty().id(); let b = world.spawn(Parent(a)).id(); assert_eq!(world.entity(a).get::<Children>().unwrap(), &[b]); ``` There are also convenience APIs for spawning more than one entity with the same relationship: ```rust world.spawn_empty().with_related::<Children>(|s| { s.spawn_empty(); s.spawn_empty(); }) ``` The existing `with_children` API is now a simpler wrapper over `with_related`. This makes this change largely non-breaking for existing spawn patterns. ```rust world.spawn_empty().with_children(|s| { s.spawn_empty(); s.spawn_empty(); }) ``` There are also other relationship APIs, such as `add_related` and `despawn_related`. ## Automatic recursive despawn via the new on_despawn hook `RelationshipSources` can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior, which will despawn all related entities in the relationship hierarchy: ```rust #[derive(RelationshipSources)] #[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent, despawn_descendants)] pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>); ``` This means that `entity.despawn_recursive()` is no longer required. Instead, just use `entity.despawn()` and the relevant related entities will also be despawned. To despawn an entity _without_ despawning its parent/child descendants, you should remove the `Children` component first, which will also remove the related `Parent` components: ```rust entity .remove::<Children>() .despawn() ``` This builds on the on_despawn hook introduced in this PR, which is fired when an entity is despawned (before other hooks). ## Relationships are the source of truth `Relationship` is the _single_ source of truth component. `RelationshipSources` is merely a reflection of what all the `Relationship` components say. By embracing this, we are able to significantly improve the performance of the system as a whole. We can rely on component lifecycles to protect us against duplicates, rather than needing to scan at runtime to ensure entities don't already exist (which results in quadratic runtime). A single source of truth gives us constant-time inserts. This does mean that we cannot directly spawn populated `Children` components (or directly add or remove entities from those components). I personally think this is a worthwhile tradeoff, both because it makes the performance much better _and_ because it means theres exactly one way to do things (which is a philosophy we try to employ for Bevy APIs). As an aside: treating both sides of the relationship as "equivalent source of truth relations" does enable building simple and flexible many-to-many relationships. But this introduces an _inherent_ need to scan (or hash) to protect against duplicates. [`evergreen_relations`](https://github.com/EvergreenNest/evergreen_relations) has a very nice implementation of the "symmetrical many-to-many" approach. Unfortunately I think the performance issues inherent to that approach make it a poor choice for Bevy's default relationship system. ## Followup Work * Discuss renaming `Parent` to `ChildOf`. I refrained from doing that in this PR to keep the diff reasonable, but I'm personally biased toward this change (and using that naming pattern generally for relationships). * [Improved spawning ergonomics](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/16920) * Consider adding relationship observers/triggers for "relationship targets" whenever a source is added or removed. This would replace the current "hierarchy events" system, which is unused upstream but may have existing users downstream. I think triggers are the better fit for this than a buffered event queue, and would prefer not to add that back. * Fragmenting relations: My current idea hinges on the introduction of "value components" (aka: components whose type _and_ value determines their ComponentId, via something like Hashing / PartialEq). By labeling a Relationship component such as `ChildOf(Entity)` as a "value component", `ChildOf(e1)` and `ChildOf(e2)` would be considered "different components". This makes the transition between fragmenting and non-fragmenting a single flag, and everything else continues to work as expected. * Many-to-many support * Non-fragmenting: We can expand Relationship to be a list of entities instead of a single entity. I have largely already written the code for this. * Fragmenting: With the "value component" impl mentioned above, we get many-to-many support "for free", as it would allow inserting multiple copies of a Relationship component with different target entities. Fixes #3742 (If this PR is merged, I think we should open more targeted followup issues for the work above, with a fresh tracking issue free of the large amount of less-directed historical context) Fixes #17301 Fixes #12235 Fixes #15299 Fixes #15308 ## Migration Guide * Replace `ChildBuilder` with `ChildSpawnerCommands`. * Replace calls to `.set_parent(parent_id)` with `.insert(Parent(parent_id))`. * Replace calls to `.replace_children()` with `.remove::<Children>()` followed by `.add_children()`. Note that you'll need to manually despawn any children that are not carried over. * Replace calls to `.despawn_recursive()` with `.despawn()`. * Replace calls to `.despawn_descendants()` with `.despawn_related::<Children>()`. * If you have any calls to `.despawn()` which depend on the children being preserved, you'll need to remove the `Children` component first. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
MichiRecRoom
|
26bb0b40d2
|
Move #![warn(clippy::allow_attributes, clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason)] to the workspace Cargo.toml (#17374)
# Objective Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111 ## Solution Move `#![warn(clippy::allow_attributes, clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason)]` to the workspace `Cargo.toml` ## Testing Lots of CI testing, and local testing too. --------- Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com> |
||
|
MichiRecRoom
|
17c46f4add
|
bevy_ecs: Apply #![warn(clippy::allow_attributes, clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason)] (#17335)
# Objective - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111 ## Solution Set the `clippy::allow_attributes` and `clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason` lints to `warn`, and bring `bevy_ecs` in line with the new restrictions. ## Testing This PR is a WIP; testing will happen after it's finished. |