e79bc7811d
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Alice Cecile
|
a7e9330af9
|
Implement WorldQuery for MainWorld and RenderWorld components (#15745)
# Objective #15320 is a particularly painful breaking change, and the new `RenderEntity` in particular is very noisy, with a lot of `let entity = entity.id()` spam. ## Solution Implement `WorldQuery`, `QueryData` and `ReadOnlyQueryData` for `RenderEntity` and `WorldEntity`. These work the same as the `Entity` impls from a user-facing perspective: they simply return an owned (copied) `Entity` identifier. This dramatically reduces noise and eases migration. Under the hood, these impls defer to the implementations for `&T` for everything other than the "call .id() for the user" bit, as they involve read-only access to component data. Doing it this way (as opposed to implementing a custom fetch, as tried in the first commit) dramatically reduces the maintenance risk of complex unsafe code outside of `bevy_ecs`. To make this easier (and encourage users to do this themselves!), I've made `ReadFetch` and `WriteFetch` slightly more public: they're no longer `doc(hidden)`. This is a good change, since trying to vendor the logic is much worse than just deferring to the existing tested impls. ## Testing I've run a handful of rendering examples (breakout, alien_cake_addict, auto_exposure, fog_volumes, box_shadow) and nothing broke. ## Follow-up We should lint for the uses of `&RenderEntity` and `&MainEntity` in queries: this is just less nice for no reason. --------- Co-authored-by: Trashtalk217 <trashtalk217@gmail.com> |
||
|
charlotte
|
dd812b3e49
|
Type safe retained render world (#15756)
# Objective In the Render World, there are a number of collections that are derived from Main World entities and are used to drive rendering. The most notable are: - `VisibleEntities`, which is generated in the `check_visibility` system and contains visible entities for a view. - `ExtractedInstances`, which maps entity ids to asset ids. In the old model, these collections were trivially kept in sync -- any extracted phase item could look itself up because the render entity id was guaranteed to always match the corresponding main world id. After #15320, this became much more complicated, and was leading to a number of subtle bugs in the Render World. The main rendering systems, i.e. `queue_material_meshes` and `queue_material2d_meshes`, follow a similar pattern: ```rust for visible_entity in visible_entities.iter::<With<Mesh2d>>() { let Some(mesh_instance) = render_mesh_instances.get_mut(visible_entity) else { continue; }; // Look some more stuff up and specialize the pipeline... let bin_key = Opaque2dBinKey { pipeline: pipeline_id, draw_function: draw_opaque_2d, asset_id: mesh_instance.mesh_asset_id.into(), material_bind_group_id: material_2d.get_bind_group_id().0, }; opaque_phase.add( bin_key, *visible_entity, BinnedRenderPhaseType::mesh(mesh_instance.automatic_batching), ); } ``` In this case, `visible_entities` and `render_mesh_instances` are both collections that are created and keyed by Main World entity ids, and so this lookup happens to work by coincidence. However, there is a major unintentional bug here: namely, because `visible_entities` is a collection of Main World ids, the phase item being queued is created with a Main World id rather than its correct Render World id. This happens to not break mesh rendering because the render commands used for drawing meshes do not access the `ItemQuery` parameter, but demonstrates the confusion that is now possible: our UI phase items are correctly being queued with Render World ids while our meshes aren't. Additionally, this makes it very easy and error prone to use the wrong entity id to look up things like assets. For example, if instead we ignored visibility checks and queued our meshes via a query, we'd have to be extra careful to use `&MainEntity` instead of the natural `Entity`. ## Solution Make all collections that are derived from Main World data use `MainEntity` as their key, to ensure type safety and avoid accidentally looking up data with the wrong entity id: ```rust pub type MainEntityHashMap<V> = hashbrown::HashMap<MainEntity, V, EntityHash>; ``` Additionally, we make all `PhaseItem` be able to provide both their Main and Render World ids, to allow render phase implementors maximum flexibility as to what id should be used to look up data. You can think of this like tracking at the type level whether something in the Render World should use it's "primary key", i.e. entity id, or needs to use a foreign key, i.e. `MainEntity`. ## Testing ##### TODO: This will require extensive testing to make sure things didn't break! Additionally, some extraction logic has become more complicated and needs to be checked for regressions. ## Migration Guide With the advent of the retained render world, collections that contain references to `Entity` that are extracted into the render world have been changed to contain `MainEntity` in order to prevent errors where a render world entity id is used to look up an item by accident. Custom rendering code may need to be changed to query for `&MainEntity` in order to look up the correct item from such a collection. Additionally, users who implement their own extraction logic for collections of main world entity should strongly consider extracting into a different collection that uses `MainEntity` as a key. Additionally, render phases now require specifying both the `Entity` and `MainEntity` for a given `PhaseItem`. Custom render phases should ensure `MainEntity` is available when queuing a phase item. |
||
|
Christian Hughes
|
219b5930f1
|
Rename App/World::observe to add_observer, EntityWorldMut::observe_entity to observe. (#15754)
# Objective - Closes #15752 Calling the functions `App::observe` and `World::observe` doesn't make sense because you're not "observing" the `App` or `World`, you're adding an observer that listens for an event that occurs *within* the `World`. We should rename them to better fit this. ## Solution Renames: - `App::observe` -> `App::add_observer` - `World::observe` -> `World::add_observer` - `Commands::observe` -> `Commands::add_observer` - `EntityWorldMut::observe_entity` -> `EntityWorldMut::observe` (Note this isn't a breaking change as the original rename was introduced earlier this cycle.) ## Testing Reusing current tests. |
||
|
Kristoffer Søholm
|
2d1b4939d2
|
Synchronize removed components with the render world (#15582)
# Objective Fixes #15560 Fixes (most of) #15570 Currently a lot of examples (and presumably some user code) depend on toggling certain render features by adding/removing a single component to an entity, e.g. `SpotLight` to toggle a light. Because of the retained render world this no longer works: Extract will add any new components, but when it is removed the entity persists unchanged in the render world. ## Solution Add `SyncComponentPlugin<C: Component>` that registers `SyncToRenderWorld` as a required component for `C`, and adds a component hook that will clear all components from the render world entity when `C` is removed. We add this plugin to `ExtractComponentPlugin` which fixes most instances of the problem. For custom extraction logic we can manually add `SyncComponentPlugin` for that component. We also rename `WorldSyncPlugin` to `SyncWorldPlugin` so we start a naming convention like all the `Extract` plugins. In this PR I also fixed a bunch of breakage related to the retained render world, stemming from old code that assumed that `Entity` would be the same in both worlds. I found that using the `RenderEntity` wrapper instead of `Entity` in data structures when referring to render world entities makes intent much clearer, so I propose we make this an official pattern. ## Testing Run examples like ``` cargo run --features pbr_multi_layer_material_textures --example clearcoat cargo run --example volumetric_fog ``` and see that they work, and that toggles work correctly. But really we should test every single example, as we might not even have caught all the breakage yet. --- ## Migration Guide The retained render world notes should be updated to explain this edge case and `SyncComponentPlugin` --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Trashtalk217 <trashtalk217@gmail.com> |