# Objective
Prevents duplicate implementation between IntoSystemConfigs and
IntoSystemSetConfigs using a generic, adds a NodeType trait for more
config flexibility (opening the door to implement
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14195?).
## Solution
Followed writeup by @ItsDoot:
https://hackmd.io/@doot/rJeefFHc1x
Removes IntoSystemConfigs and IntoSystemSetConfigs, instead using
IntoNodeConfigs with generics.
## Testing
Pending
---
## Showcase
N/A
## Migration Guide
SystemSetConfigs -> NodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet>
SystemConfigs -> NodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem>
IntoSystemSetConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<InternedSystemSet, M>
IntoSystemConfigs -> IntoNodeConfigs<ScheduleSystem, M>
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
This pr uses the `extern crate self as` trick to make proc macros behave
the same way inside and outside bevy.
# Objective
- Removes noise introduced by `crate as` in the whole bevy repo.
- Fixes#17004.
- Hardens proc macro path resolution.
## TODO
- [x] `BevyManifest` needs cleanup.
- [x] Cleanup remaining `crate as`.
- [x] Add proper integration tests to the ci.
## Notes
- `cargo-manifest-proc-macros` is written by me and based/inspired by
the old `BevyManifest` implementation and
[`bkchr/proc-macro-crate`](https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate).
- What do you think about the new integration test machinery I added to
the `ci`?
More and better integration tests can be added at a later stage.
The goal of these integration tests is to simulate an actual separate
crate that uses bevy. Ideally they would lightly touch all bevy crates.
## Testing
- Needs RA test
- Needs testing from other users
- Others need to run at least `cargo run -p ci integration-test` and
verify that they work.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fix some outdated `bevy_state` documentation examples.
## Solution
- updated some doc examples in `bevy_state` that hadn't been updated
with the API.
- fixed an outdated link in the documentation issue template that
referred to a 404 page instead of the contribution guide.
## Testing
No necessary testing aside from the usual doctests.
---
## Showcase
N/A
## Migration Guide
N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#13854
## Solution
Removed the inaccurate warning. This was done for a few reasons:
- States not existing is now a valid "state" (for lack of a better term)
- Other run conditions don't provide an equivalent warning
# Objective
- My attempt at fulfilling #13629.
## Solution
Renames the `and_then` / `or_else` run condition methods to `and` /
`or`, respectively.
Extends the run conditions API to include a suite of binary logical
operators:
- `and`
- `or`
- `nand`
- `nor`
- `xor`
- `xnor`
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- The test **run_condition_combinators** was extended to include the
added run condition combinators. A **double_counter** system was added
to test for combinators running on even count cycles.
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- I'm not too sure how I feel about the "counter" style of testing but I
wanted to keep it consistent. If it's just a unit test I would prefer
simply to just assert `true` == _combinator output_ or `false` ==
_combinator output_ .
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- Nothing too specific. The added methods should be equivalent to the
logical operators they are analogous to (`&&` , `||`, `^`, `!`).
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
- Should not be relevant, I'm using Windows.
## Changelog
- What changed as a result of this PR?
- The run conditions API.
- If applicable, organize changes under "Added", "Changed", or "Fixed"
sub-headings
- Changed:
- `and_then` run condition combinator renamed to simply `and`
- `or_else` run condition combinator renamed to simply `or`
- Added:
- `nand` run condition combinator.
- `nor` run condition combinator.
- `xor` run condition combinator.
- `xnor` run condition combinator.
## Migration Guide
- The `and_then` run condition method has been replaced with the `and`
run condition method.
- The `or_else` run condition method has been replaced with the `or` run
condition method.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andres O. Vela <andresovela@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- `bevy_state_macros` is a new crate added in the 0.14
- it already exists outside of the bevy org:
https://crates.io/crates/bevy_state_macros
## Solution
- Rename the crate
# Objective
Extracts the state mechanisms into a new crate called "bevy_state".
This comes with a few goals:
- state wasn't really an inherent machinery of the ecs system, and so
keeping it within bevy_ecs felt forced
- by mixing it in with bevy_ecs, the maintainability of our more robust
state system was significantly compromised
moving state into a new crate makes it easier to encapsulate as it's own
feature, and easier to read and understand since it's no longer a
single, massive file.
## Solution
move the state-related elements from bevy_ecs to a new crate
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how? all the automated tests
migrated and passed, ran the pre-existing examples without changes to
validate.
---
## Migration Guide
Since bevy_state is now gated behind the `bevy_state` feature, projects
that use state but don't use the `default-features` will need to add
that feature flag.
Since it is no longer part of bevy_ecs, projects that use bevy_ecs
directly will need to manually pull in `bevy_state`, trigger the
StateTransition schedule, and handle any of the elements that bevy_app
currently sets up.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kristoffer Søholm <k.soeholm@gmail.com>
