f4bd56d26d
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Alice Cecile
|
2ad5908e58
|
Make Query::single (and friends) return a Result (#18082)
# Objective As discussed in #14275, Bevy is currently too prone to panic, and makes the easy / beginner-friendly way to do a large number of operations just to panic on failure. This is seriously frustrating in library code, but also slows down development, as many of the `Query::single` panics can actually safely be an early return (these panics are often due to a small ordering issue or a change in game state. More critically, in most "finished" products, panics are unacceptable: any unexpected failures should be handled elsewhere. That's where the new With the advent of good system error handling, we can now remove this. Note: I was instrumental in a) introducing this idea in the first place and b) pushing to make the panicking variant the default. The introduction of both `let else` statements in Rust and the fancy system error handling work in 0.16 have changed my mind on the right balance here. ## Solution 1. Make `Query::single` and `Query::single_mut` (and other random related methods) return a `Result`. 2. Handle all of Bevy's internal usage of these APIs. 3. Deprecate `Query::get_single` and friends, since we've moved their functionality to the nice names. 4. Add detailed advice on how to best handle these errors. Generally I like the diff here, although `get_single().unwrap()` in tests is a bit of a downgrade. ## Testing I've done a global search for `.single` to track down any missed deprecated usages. As to whether or not all the migrations were successful, that's what CI is for :) ## Future work ~~Rename `Query::get_single` and friends to `Query::single`!~~ ~~I've opted not to do this in this PR, and smear it across two releases in order to ease the migration. Successive deprecations are much easier to manage than the semantics and types shifting under your feet.~~ Cart has convinced me to change my mind on this; see https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/18082#discussion_r1974536085. ## Migration guide `Query::single`, `Query::single_mut` and their `QueryState` equivalents now return a `Result`. Generally, you'll want to: 1. Use Bevy 0.16's system error handling to return a `Result` using the `?` operator. 2. Use a `let else Ok(data)` block to early return if it's an expected failure. 3. Use `unwrap()` or `Ok` destructuring inside of tests. The old `Query::get_single` (etc) methods which did this have been deprecated. |
||
|
Marco Buono
|
ef23f465ce
|
Do not re-check visibility or re-render shadow maps for point and spot lights for each view (#15156)
# Objective _If I understand it correctly_, we were checking mesh visibility, as well as re-rendering point and spot light shadow maps for each view. This makes it so that M views and N lights produce M x N complexity. This PR aims to fix that, as well as introduce a stress test for this specific scenario. ## Solution - Keep track of what lights have already had mesh visibility calculated and do not calculate it again; - Reuse shadow depth textures and attachments across all views, and only render shadow maps for the _first_ time a light is encountered on a view; - Directional lights remain unaltered, since their shadow map cascades are view-dependent; - Add a new `many_cameras_lights` stress test example to verify the solution ## Showcase 110% speed up on the stress test 83% reduction of memory usage in stress test ### Before (5.35 FPS on stress test) <img width="1392" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-11 at 12 25 57" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/136b0785-e9a4-44df-9a22-f99cc465e126"> ### After (11.34 FPS on stress test) <img width="1392" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-11 at 12 24 35" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b8dd858f-5e19-467f-8344-2b46ca039630"> ## Testing - Did you test these changes? If so, how? - On my game project where I have two cameras, and many shadow casting lights I managed to get pretty much double the FPS. - Also included a stress test, see the comparison above - Are there any parts that need more testing? - Yes, I would like help verifying that this fix is indeed correct, and that we were really re-rendering the shadow maps by mistake and it's indeed okay to not do that - How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything specific they need to know? - Run the `many_cameras_lights` example - On the `main` branch, cherry pick the commit with the example (`git cherry-pick --no-commit 1ed4ace01`) and run it - If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are there any important ones you can't test? - macOS --------- Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com> |