f98727c1b1
27 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joona Aalto
|
38c3423693
|
Event Split: Event, EntityEvent, and BufferedEvent (#19647)
# Objective Closes #19564. The current `Event` trait looks like this: ```rust pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } ``` The `Event` trait is used by both buffered events (`EventReader`/`EventWriter`) and observer events. If they are observer events, they can optionally be targeted at specific `Entity`s or `ComponentId`s, and can even be propagated to other entities. However, there has long been a desire to split the trait semantically for a variety of reasons, see #14843, #14272, and #16031 for discussion. Some reasons include: - It's very uncommon to use a single event type as both a buffered event and targeted observer event. They are used differently and tend to have distinct semantics. - A common footgun is using buffered events with observers or event readers with observer events, as there is no type-level error that prevents this kind of misuse. - #19440 made `Trigger::target` return an `Option<Entity>`. This *seriously* hurts ergonomics for the general case of entity observers, as you need to `.unwrap()` each time. If we could statically determine whether the event is expected to have an entity target, this would be unnecessary. There's really two main ways that we can categorize events: push vs. pull (i.e. "observer event" vs. "buffered event") and global vs. targeted: | | Push | Pull | | ------------ | --------------- | --------------------------- | | **Global** | Global observer | `EventReader`/`EventWriter` | | **Targeted** | Entity observer | - | There are many ways to approach this, each with their tradeoffs. Ultimately, we kind of want to split events both ways: - A type-level distinction between observer events and buffered events, to prevent people from using the wrong kind of event in APIs - A statically designated entity target for observer events to avoid accidentally using untargeted events for targeted APIs This PR achieves these goals by splitting event traits into `Event`, `EntityEvent`, and `BufferedEvent`, with `Event` being the shared trait implemented by all events. ## `Event`, `EntityEvent`, and `BufferedEvent` `Event` is now a very simple trait shared by all events. ```rust pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { // Required for observer APIs fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } ``` You can call `trigger` for *any* event, and use a global observer for listening to the event. ```rust #[derive(Event)] struct Speak { message: String, } // ... app.add_observer(|trigger: On<Speak>| { println!("{}", trigger.message); }); // ... commands.trigger(Speak { message: "Y'all like these reworked events?".to_string(), }); ``` To allow an event to be targeted at entities and even propagated further, you can additionally implement the `EntityEvent` trait: ```rust pub trait EntityEvent: Event { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; } ``` This lets you call `trigger_targets`, and to use targeted observer APIs like `EntityCommands::observe`: ```rust #[derive(Event, EntityEvent)] #[entity_event(traversal = &'static ChildOf, auto_propagate)] struct Damage { amount: f32, } // ... let enemy = commands.spawn((Enemy, Health(100.0))).id(); // Spawn some armor as a child of the enemy entity. // When the armor takes damage, it will bubble the event up to the enemy. let armor_piece = commands .spawn((ArmorPiece, Health(25.0), ChildOf(enemy))) .observe(|trigger: On<Damage>, mut query: Query<&mut Health>| { // Note: `On::target` only exists because this is an `EntityEvent`. let mut health = query.get(trigger.target()).unwrap(); health.0 -= trigger.amount(); }); commands.trigger_targets(Damage { amount: 10.0 }, armor_piece); ``` > [!NOTE] > You *can* still also trigger an `EntityEvent` without targets using `trigger`. We probably *could* make this an either-or thing, but I'm not sure that's actually desirable. To allow an event to be used with the buffered API, you can implement `BufferedEvent`: ```rust pub trait BufferedEvent: Event {} ``` The event can then be used with `EventReader`/`EventWriter`: ```rust #[derive(Event, BufferedEvent)] struct Message(String); fn write_hello(mut writer: EventWriter<Message>) { writer.write(Message("I hope these examples are alright".to_string())); } fn read_messages(mut reader: EventReader<Message>) { // Process all buffered events of type `Message`. for Message(message) in reader.read() { println!("{message}"); } } ``` In summary: - Need a basic event you can trigger and observe? Derive `Event`! - Need the event to be targeted at an entity? Derive `EntityEvent`! - Need the event to be buffered and support the `EventReader`/`EventWriter` API? Derive `BufferedEvent`! ## Alternatives I'll now cover some of the alternative approaches I have considered and briefly explored. I made this section collapsible since it ended up being quite long :P <details> <summary>Expand this to see alternatives</summary> ### 1. Unified `Event` Trait One option is not to have *three* separate traits (`Event`, `EntityEvent`, `BufferedEvent`), and to instead just use associated constants on `Event` to determine whether an event supports targeting and buffering or not: ```rust pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; const TARGETED: bool = false; const BUFFERED: bool = false; fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } ``` Methods can then use bounds like `where E: Event<TARGETED = true>` or `where E: Event<BUFFERED = true>` to limit APIs to specific kinds of events. This would keep everything under one `Event` trait, but I don't think it's necessarily a good idea. It makes APIs harder to read, and docs can't easily refer to specific types of events. You can also create weird invariants: what if you specify `TARGETED = false`, but have `Traversal` and/or `AUTO_PROPAGATE` enabled? ### 2. `Event` and `Trigger` Another option is to only split the traits between buffered events and observer events, since that is the main thing people have been asking for, and they have the largest API difference. If we did this, I think we would need to make the terms *clearly* separate. We can't really use `Event` and `BufferedEvent` as the names, since it would be strange that `BufferedEvent` doesn't implement `Event`. Something like `ObserverEvent` and `BufferedEvent` could work, but it'd be more verbose. For this approach, I would instead keep `Event` for the current `EventReader`/`EventWriter` API, and call the observer event a `Trigger`, since the "trigger" terminology is already used in the observer context within Bevy (both as a noun and a verb). This is also what a long [bikeshed on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1298057661878898791) seemed to land on at the end of last year. ```rust // For `EventReader`/`EventWriter` pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static {} // For observers pub trait Trigger: Send + Sync + 'static { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; const TARGETED: bool = false; fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } ``` The problem is that "event" is just a really good term for something that "happens". Observers are rapidly becoming the more prominent API, so it'd be weird to give them the `Trigger` name and leave the good `Event` name for the less common API. So, even though a split like this seems neat on the surface, I think it ultimately wouldn't really work. We want to keep the `Event` name for observer events, and there is no good alternative for the buffered variant. (`Message` was suggested, but saying stuff like "sends a collision message" is weird.) ### 3. `GlobalEvent` + `TargetedEvent` What if instead of focusing on the buffered vs. observed split, we *only* make a distinction between global and targeted events? ```rust // A shared event trait to allow global observers to work pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } // For buffered events and non-targeted observer events pub trait GlobalEvent: Event {} // For targeted observer events pub trait TargetedEvent: Event { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; } ``` This is actually the first approach I implemented, and it has the neat characteristic that you can only use non-targeted APIs like `trigger` with a `GlobalEvent` and targeted APIs like `trigger_targets` with a `TargetedEvent`. You have full control over whether the entity should or should not have a target, as they are fully distinct at the type-level. However, there's a few problems: - There is no type-level indication of whether a `GlobalEvent` supports buffered events or just non-targeted observer events - An `Event` on its own does literally nothing, it's just a shared trait required to make global observers accept both non-targeted and targeted events - If an event is both a `GlobalEvent` and `TargetedEvent`, global observers again have ambiguity on whether an event has a target or not, undermining some of the benefits - The names are not ideal ### 4. `Event` and `EntityEvent` We can fix some of the problems of Alternative 3 by accepting that targeted events can also be used in non-targeted contexts, and simply having the `Event` and `EntityEvent` traits: ```rust // For buffered events and non-targeted observer events pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static { fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... } fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... } } // For targeted observer events pub trait EntityEvent: Event { type Traversal: Traversal<Self>; const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false; } ``` This is essentially identical to this PR, just without a dedicated `BufferedEvent`. The remaining major "problem" is that there is still zero type-level indication of whether an `Event` event *actually* supports the buffered API. This leads us to the solution proposed in this PR, using `Event`, `EntityEvent`, and `BufferedEvent`. </details> ## Conclusion The `Event` + `EntityEvent` + `BufferedEvent` split proposed in this PR aims to solve all the common problems with Bevy's current event model while keeping the "weirdness" factor minimal. It splits in terms of both the push vs. pull *and* global vs. targeted aspects, while maintaining a shared concept for an "event". ### Why I Like This - The term "event" remains as a single concept for all the different kinds of events in Bevy. - Despite all event types being "events", they use fundamentally different APIs. Instead of assuming that you can use an event type with any pattern (when only one is typically supported), you explicitly opt in to each one with dedicated traits. - Using separate traits for each type of event helps with documentation and clearer function signatures. - I can safely make assumptions on expected usage. - If I see that an event is an `EntityEvent`, I can assume that I can use `observe` on it and get targeted events. - If I see that an event is a `BufferedEvent`, I can assume that I can use `EventReader` to read events. - If I see both `EntityEvent` and `BufferedEvent`, I can assume that both APIs are supported. In summary: This allows for a unified concept for events, while limiting the different ways to use them with opt-in traits. No more guess-work involved when using APIs. ### Problems? - Because `BufferedEvent` implements `Event` (for more consistent semantics etc.), you can still use all buffered events for non-targeted observers. I think this is fine/good. The important part is that if you see that an event implements `BufferedEvent`, you know that the `EventReader`/`EventWriter` API should be supported. Whether it *also* supports other APIs is secondary. - I currently only support `trigger_targets` for an `EntityEvent`. However, you can technically target components too, without targeting any entities. I consider that such a niche and advanced use case that it's not a huge problem to only support it for `EntityEvent`s, but we could also split `trigger_targets` into `trigger_entities` and `trigger_components` if we wanted to (or implement components as entities :P). - You can still trigger an `EntityEvent` *without* targets. I consider this correct, since `Event` implements the non-targeted behavior, and it'd be weird if implementing another trait *removed* behavior. However, it does mean that global observers for entity events can technically return `Entity::PLACEHOLDER` again (since I got rid of the `Option<Entity>` added in #19440 for ergonomics). I think that's enough of an edge case that it's not a huge problem, but it is worth keeping in mind. - ~~Deriving both `EntityEvent` and `BufferedEvent` for the same type currently duplicates the `Event` implementation, so you instead need to manually implement one of them.~~ Changed to always requiring `Event` to be derived. ## Related Work There are plans to implement multi-event support for observers, especially for UI contexts. [Cart's example](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14649#issuecomment-2960402508) API looked like this: ```rust // Truncated for brevity trigger: Trigger<( OnAdd<Pressed>, OnRemove<Pressed>, OnAdd<InteractionDisabled>, OnRemove<InteractionDisabled>, OnInsert<Hovered>, )>, ``` I believe this shouldn't be in conflict with this PR. If anything, this PR might *help* achieve the multi-event pattern for entity observers with fewer footguns: by statically enforcing that all of these events are `EntityEvent`s in the context of `EntityCommands::observe`, we can avoid misuse or weird cases where *some* events inside the trigger are targeted while others are not. |
||
|
ickshonpe
|
02fa833be1
|
Rename JustifyText to Justify (#19522)
# Objective Rename `JustifyText`: * The name `JustifyText` is just ugly. * It's inconsistent since no other `bevy_text` types have a `Text-` suffix, only prefix. * It's inconsistent with the other text layout enum `Linebreak` which doesn't have a prefix or suffix. Fixes #19521. ## Solution Rename `JustifyText` to `Justify`. Without other context, it's natural to assume the name `Justify` refers to text justification. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
robtfm
|
b641aa0ecf
|
separate border colors (#18682)
# Objective allow specifying the left/top/right/bottom border colors separately for ui elements fixes #14773 ## Solution - change `BorderColor` to ```rs pub struct BorderColor { pub left: Color, pub top: Color, pub right: Color, pub bottom: Color, } ``` - generate one ui node per distinct border color, set flags for the active borders - render only the active borders i chose to do this rather than adding multiple colors to the ExtractedUiNode in order to minimize the impact for the common case where all border colors are the same. ## Testing modified the `borders` example to use separate colors:  the behaviour is a bit weird but it mirrors html/css border behaviour. --- ## Migration: To keep the existing behaviour, just change `BorderColor(color)` into `BorderColor::all(color)`. --------- Co-authored-by: ickshonpe <david.curthoys@googlemail.com> |
||
|
AlephCubed
|
5f86668bbb
|
Renamed EventWriter::send methods to write. (#17977)
Fixes #17856. ## Migration Guide - `EventWriter::send` has been renamed to `EventWriter::write`. - `EventWriter::send_batch` has been renamed to `EventWriter::write_batch`. - `EventWriter::send_default` has been renamed to `EventWriter::write_default`. --------- Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
21f1e3045c
|
Relationships (non-fragmenting, one-to-many) (#17398)
This adds support for one-to-many non-fragmenting relationships (with planned paths for fragmenting and non-fragmenting many-to-many relationships). "Non-fragmenting" means that entities with the same relationship type, but different relationship targets, are not forced into separate tables (which would cause "table fragmentation"). Functionally, this fills a similar niche as the current Parent/Children system. The biggest differences are: 1. Relationships have simpler internals and significantly improved performance and UX. Commands and specialized APIs are no longer necessary to keep everything in sync. Just spawn entities with the relationship components you want and everything "just works". 2. Relationships are generalized. Bevy can provide additional built in relationships, and users can define their own. **REQUEST TO REVIEWERS**: _please don't leave top level comments and instead comment on specific lines of code. That way we can take advantage of threaded discussions. Also dont leave comments simply pointing out CI failures as I can read those just fine._ ## Built on top of what we have Relationships are implemented on top of the Bevy ECS features we already have: components, immutability, and hooks. This makes them immediately compatible with all of our existing (and future) APIs for querying, spawning, removing, scenes, reflection, etc. The fewer specialized APIs we need to build, maintain, and teach, the better. ## Why focus on one-to-many non-fragmenting first? 1. This allows us to improve Parent/Children relationships immediately, in a way that is reasonably uncontroversial. Switching our hierarchy to fragmenting relationships would have significant performance implications. ~~Flecs is heavily considering a switch to non-fragmenting relations after careful considerations of the performance tradeoffs.~~ _(Correction from @SanderMertens: Flecs is implementing non-fragmenting storage specialized for asset hierarchies, where asset hierarchies are many instances of small trees that have a well defined structure)_ 2. Adding generalized one-to-many relationships is currently a priority for the [Next Generation Scene / UI effort](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437). Specifically, we're interested in building reactions and observers on top. ## The changes This PR does the following: 1. Adds a generic one-to-many Relationship system 3. Ports the existing Parent/Children system to Relationships, which now lives in `bevy_ecs::hierarchy`. The old `bevy_hierarchy` crate has been removed. 4. Adds on_despawn component hooks 5. Relationships can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior, meaning that the entire relationship hierarchy is despawned when `entity.despawn()` is called. The built in Parent/Children hierarchies enable this behavior, and `entity.despawn_recursive()` has been removed. 6. `world.spawn` now applies commands after spawning. This ensures that relationship bookkeeping happens immediately and removes the need to manually flush. This is in line with the equivalent behaviors recently added to the other APIs (ex: insert). 7. Removes the ValidParentCheckPlugin (system-driven / poll based) in favor of a `validate_parent_has_component` hook. ## Using Relationships The `Relationship` trait looks like this: ```rust pub trait Relationship: Component + Sized { type RelationshipSources: RelationshipSources<Relationship = Self>; fn get(&self) -> Entity; fn from(entity: Entity) -> Self; } ``` A relationship is a component that: 1. Is a simple wrapper over a "target" Entity. 2. Has a corresponding `RelationshipSources` component, which is a simple wrapper over a collection of entities. Every "target entity" targeted by a "source entity" with a `Relationship` has a `RelationshipSources` component, which contains every "source entity" that targets it. For example, the `Parent` component (as it currently exists in Bevy) is the `Relationship` component and the entity containing the Parent is the "source entity". The entity _inside_ the `Parent(Entity)` component is the "target entity". And that target entity has a `Children` component (which implements `RelationshipSources`). In practice, the Parent/Children relationship looks like this: ```rust #[derive(Relationship)] #[relationship(relationship_sources = Children)] pub struct Parent(pub Entity); #[derive(RelationshipSources)] #[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent)] pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>); ``` The Relationship and RelationshipSources derives automatically implement Component with the relevant configuration (namely, the hooks necessary to keep everything in sync). The most direct way to add relationships is to spawn entities with relationship components: ```rust let a = world.spawn_empty().id(); let b = world.spawn(Parent(a)).id(); assert_eq!(world.entity(a).get::<Children>().unwrap(), &[b]); ``` There are also convenience APIs for spawning more than one entity with the same relationship: ```rust world.spawn_empty().with_related::<Children>(|s| { s.spawn_empty(); s.spawn_empty(); }) ``` The existing `with_children` API is now a simpler wrapper over `with_related`. This makes this change largely non-breaking for existing spawn patterns. ```rust world.spawn_empty().with_children(|s| { s.spawn_empty(); s.spawn_empty(); }) ``` There are also other relationship APIs, such as `add_related` and `despawn_related`. ## Automatic recursive despawn via the new on_despawn hook `RelationshipSources` can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior, which will despawn all related entities in the relationship hierarchy: ```rust #[derive(RelationshipSources)] #[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent, despawn_descendants)] pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>); ``` This means that `entity.despawn_recursive()` is no longer required. Instead, just use `entity.despawn()` and the relevant related entities will also be despawned. To despawn an entity _without_ despawning its parent/child descendants, you should remove the `Children` component first, which will also remove the related `Parent` components: ```rust entity .remove::<Children>() .despawn() ``` This builds on the on_despawn hook introduced in this PR, which is fired when an entity is despawned (before other hooks). ## Relationships are the source of truth `Relationship` is the _single_ source of truth component. `RelationshipSources` is merely a reflection of what all the `Relationship` components say. By embracing this, we are able to significantly improve the performance of the system as a whole. We can rely on component lifecycles to protect us against duplicates, rather than needing to scan at runtime to ensure entities don't already exist (which results in quadratic runtime). A single source of truth gives us constant-time inserts. This does mean that we cannot directly spawn populated `Children` components (or directly add or remove entities from those components). I personally think this is a worthwhile tradeoff, both because it makes the performance much better _and_ because it means theres exactly one way to do things (which is a philosophy we try to employ for Bevy APIs). As an aside: treating both sides of the relationship as "equivalent source of truth relations" does enable building simple and flexible many-to-many relationships. But this introduces an _inherent_ need to scan (or hash) to protect against duplicates. [`evergreen_relations`](https://github.com/EvergreenNest/evergreen_relations) has a very nice implementation of the "symmetrical many-to-many" approach. Unfortunately I think the performance issues inherent to that approach make it a poor choice for Bevy's default relationship system. ## Followup Work * Discuss renaming `Parent` to `ChildOf`. I refrained from doing that in this PR to keep the diff reasonable, but I'm personally biased toward this change (and using that naming pattern generally for relationships). * [Improved spawning ergonomics](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/16920) * Consider adding relationship observers/triggers for "relationship targets" whenever a source is added or removed. This would replace the current "hierarchy events" system, which is unused upstream but may have existing users downstream. I think triggers are the better fit for this than a buffered event queue, and would prefer not to add that back. * Fragmenting relations: My current idea hinges on the introduction of "value components" (aka: components whose type _and_ value determines their ComponentId, via something like Hashing / PartialEq). By labeling a Relationship component such as `ChildOf(Entity)` as a "value component", `ChildOf(e1)` and `ChildOf(e2)` would be considered "different components". This makes the transition between fragmenting and non-fragmenting a single flag, and everything else continues to work as expected. * Many-to-many support * Non-fragmenting: We can expand Relationship to be a list of entities instead of a single entity. I have largely already written the code for this. * Fragmenting: With the "value component" impl mentioned above, we get many-to-many support "for free", as it would allow inserting multiple copies of a Relationship component with different target entities. Fixes #3742 (If this PR is merged, I think we should open more targeted followup issues for the work above, with a fresh tracking issue free of the large amount of less-directed historical context) Fixes #17301 Fixes #12235 Fixes #15299 Fixes #15308 ## Migration Guide * Replace `ChildBuilder` with `ChildSpawnerCommands`. * Replace calls to `.set_parent(parent_id)` with `.insert(Parent(parent_id))`. * Replace calls to `.replace_children()` with `.remove::<Children>()` followed by `.add_children()`. Note that you'll need to manually despawn any children that are not carried over. * Replace calls to `.despawn_recursive()` with `.despawn()`. * Replace calls to `.despawn_descendants()` with `.despawn_related::<Children>()`. * If you have any calls to `.despawn()` which depend on the children being preserved, you'll need to remove the `Children` component first. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
|
Carter Anderson
|
015f2c69ca
|
Merge Style properties into Node. Use ComputedNode for computed properties. (#15975)
# Objective Continue improving the user experience of our UI Node API in the direction specified by [Bevy's Next Generation Scene / UI System](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437) ## Solution As specified in the document above, merge `Style` fields into `Node`, and move "computed Node fields" into `ComputedNode` (I chose this name over something like `ComputedNodeLayout` because it currently contains more than just layout info. If we want to break this up / rename these concepts, lets do that in a separate PR). `Style` has been removed. This accomplishes a number of goals: ## Ergonomics wins Specifying both `Node` and `Style` is now no longer required for non-default styles Before: ```rust commands.spawn(( Node::default(), Style { width: Val::Px(100.), ..default() }, )); ``` After: ```rust commands.spawn(Node { width: Val::Px(100.), ..default() }); ``` ## Conceptual clarity `Style` was never a comprehensive "style sheet". It only defined "core" style properties that all `Nodes` shared. Any "styled property" that couldn't fit that mold had to be in a separate component. A "real" style system would style properties _across_ components (`Node`, `Button`, etc). We have plans to build a true style system (see the doc linked above). By moving the `Style` fields to `Node`, we fully embrace `Node` as the driving concept and remove the "style system" confusion. ## Next Steps * Consider identifying and splitting out "style properties that aren't core to Node". This should not happen for Bevy 0.15. --- ## Migration Guide Move any fields set on `Style` into `Node` and replace all `Style` component usage with `Node`. Before: ```rust commands.spawn(( Node::default(), Style { width: Val::Px(100.), ..default() }, )); ``` After: ```rust commands.spawn(Node { width: Val::Px(100.), ..default() }); ``` For any usage of the "computed node properties" that used to live on `Node`, use `ComputedNode` instead: Before: ```rust fn system(nodes: Query<&Node>) { for node in &nodes { let computed_size = node.size(); } } ``` After: ```rust fn system(computed_nodes: Query<&ComputedNode>) { for computed_node in &computed_nodes { let computed_size = computed_node.size(); } } ``` |
||
|
VitalyR
|
eb19a9ea0b
|
Migrate UI bundles to required components (#15898)
# Objective - Migrate UI bundles to required components, fixes #15889 ## Solution - deprecate `NodeBundle` in favor of `Node` - deprecate `ImageBundle` in favor of `UiImage` - deprecate `ButtonBundle` in favor of `Button` ## Testing CI. ## Migration Guide - Replace all uses of `NodeBundle` with `Node`. e.g. ```diff commands - .spawn(NodeBundle { - style: Style { + .spawn(( + Node::default(), + Style { width: Val::Percent(100.), align_items: AlignItems::Center, justify_content: JustifyContent::Center, ..default() }, - ..default() - }) + )) ``` - Replace all uses of `ButtonBundle` with `Button`. e.g. ```diff .spawn(( - ButtonBundle { - style: Style { - width: Val::Px(w), - height: Val::Px(h), - // horizontally center child text - justify_content: JustifyContent::Center, - // vertically center child text - align_items: AlignItems::Center, - margin: UiRect::all(Val::Px(20.0)), - ..default() - }, - image: image.clone().into(), + Button, + Style { + width: Val::Px(w), + height: Val::Px(h), + // horizontally center child text + justify_content: JustifyContent::Center, + // vertically center child text + align_items: AlignItems::Center, + margin: UiRect::all(Val::Px(20.0)), ..default() }, + UiImage::from(image.clone()), ImageScaleMode::Sliced(slicer.clone()), )) ``` - Replace all uses of `ImageBundle` with `UiImage`. e.g. ```diff - commands.spawn(ImageBundle { - image: UiImage { + commands.spawn(( + UiImage { texture: metering_mask, ..default() }, - style: Style { + Style { width: Val::Percent(100.0), height: Val::Percent(100.0), ..default() }, - ..default() - }); + )); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
|
Pablo Reinhardt
|
d96a9d15f6
|
Migrate from Query::single and friends to Single (#15872)
# Objective - closes #15866 ## Solution - Simply migrate where possible. ## Testing - Expect that CI will do most of the work. Examples is another way of testing this, as most of the work is in that area. --- ## Notes For now, this PR doesn't migrate `QueryState::single` and friends as for now, this look like another issue. So for example, QueryBuilders that used single or `World::query` that used single wasn't migrated. If there is a easy way to migrate those, please let me know. Most of the uses of `Query::single` were removed, the only other uses that I found was related to tests of said methods, so will probably be removed when we remove `Query::single`. |
||
|
ickshonpe
|
6f7d0e5725
|
split up TextStyle (#15857)
# Objective
Currently text is recomputed unnecessarily on any changes to its color,
which is extremely expensive.
## Solution
Split up `TextStyle` into two separate components `TextFont` and
`TextColor`.
## Testing
I added this system to `many_buttons`:
```rust
fn set_text_colors_changed(mut colors: Query<&mut TextColor>) {
for mut text_color in colors.iter_mut() {
text_color.set_changed();
}
}
```
reports ~4fps on main, ~50fps with this PR.
## Migration Guide
`TextStyle` has been renamed to `TextFont` and its `color` field has
been moved to a separate component named `TextColor` which newtypes
`Color`.
|
||
|
UkoeHB
|
a6be9b4ccd
|
Rename TextBlock to TextLayout (#15797)
# Objective - Improve clarity when spawning a text block. See [this discussion](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15591/#discussion_r1787083571). ## Solution - Rename `TextBlock` to `TextLayout`. |
||
|
UkoeHB
|
c2c19e5ae4
|
Text rework (#15591)
**Ready for review. Examples migration progress: 100%.** # Objective - Implement https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/15014 ## Solution This implements [cart's proposal](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/15014#discussioncomment-10574459) faithfully except for one change. I separated `TextSpan` from `TextSpan2d` because `TextSpan` needs to require the `GhostNode` component, which is a `bevy_ui` component only usable by UI. Extra changes: - Added `EntityCommands::commands_mut` that returns a mutable reference. This is a blocker for extension methods that return something other than `self`. Note that `sickle_ui`'s `UiBuilder::commands` returns a mutable reference for this reason. ## Testing - [x] Text examples all work. --- ## Showcase TODO: showcase-worthy ## Migration Guide TODO: very breaking ### Accessing text spans by index Text sections are now text sections on different entities in a hierarchy, Use the new `TextReader` and `TextWriter` system parameters to access spans by index. Before: ```rust fn refresh_text(mut query: Query<&mut Text, With<TimeText>>, time: Res<Time>) { let text = query.single_mut(); text.sections[1].value = format_time(time.elapsed()); } ``` After: ```rust fn refresh_text( query: Query<Entity, With<TimeText>>, mut writer: UiTextWriter, time: Res<Time> ) { let entity = query.single(); *writer.text(entity, 1) = format_time(time.elapsed()); } ``` ### Iterating text spans Text spans are now entities in a hierarchy, so the new `UiTextReader` and `UiTextWriter` system parameters provide ways to iterate that hierarchy. The `UiTextReader::iter` method will give you a normal iterator over spans, and `UiTextWriter::for_each` lets you visit each of the spans. --------- Co-authored-by: ickshonpe <david.curthoys@googlemail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com> |
||
|
Joona Aalto
|
25bfa80e60
|
Migrate cameras to required components (#15641)
# Objective Yet another PR for migrating stuff to required components. This time, cameras! ## Solution As per the [selected proposal](https://hackmd.io/tsYID4CGRiWxzsgawzxG_g#Combined-Proposal-1-Selected), deprecate `Camera2dBundle` and `Camera3dBundle` in favor of `Camera2d` and `Camera3d`. Adding a `Camera` without `Camera2d` or `Camera3d` now logs a warning, as suggested by Cart [on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1264881140007702558/1291506402832945273). I would personally like cameras to work a bit differently and be split into a few more components, to avoid some footguns and confusing semantics, but that is more controversial, and shouldn't block this core migration. ## Testing I ran a few 2D and 3D examples, and tried cameras with and without render graphs. --- ## Migration Guide `Camera2dBundle` and `Camera3dBundle` have been deprecated in favor of `Camera2d` and `Camera3d`. Inserting them will now also insert the other components required by them automatically. |
||
|
Tero Laxström
|
522d82b21a
|
Fixing text sizes for examples (#15190)
# Objective - Fixes #14265 ## Solution - Go through Pixel Eagle examples (and examples all in all) - If default size is used it is usually left there - If size of font is touched try dividing with 1.2 and round it to nearest whole number ## Testing - Run example before and after - Make sure examples text are readable or like before cosmic-text change --- ## Showcase Before:  After:  |
||
|
François Mockers
|
160bcc787c
|
fix remaining issues with background color in examples (#14115)
# Objective - Fixes #14097 ## Solution - Switching the uses of `UiImage` in examples to `BackgroundColor` when needed |
||
|
Alice Cecile
|
336fddb101
|
Make default behavior for BackgroundColor and BorderColor more intuitive (#14017)
# Objective In Bevy 0.13, `BackgroundColor` simply tinted the image of any `UiImage`. This was confusing: in every other case (e.g. Text), this added a solid square behind the element. #11165 changed this, but removed `BackgroundColor` from `ImageBundle` to avoid confusion, since the semantic meaning had changed. However, this resulted in a serious UX downgrade / inconsistency, as this behavior was no longer part of the bundle (unlike for `TextBundle` or `NodeBundle`), leaving users with a relatively frustrating upgrade path. Additionally, adding both `BackgroundColor` and `UiImage` resulted in a bizarre effect, where the background color was seemingly ignored as it was covered by a solid white placeholder image. Fixes #13969. ## Solution Per @viridia's design: > - if you don't specify a background color, it's transparent. > - if you don't specify an image color, it's white (because it's a multiplier). > - if you don't specify an image, no image is drawn. > - if you specify both a background color and an image color, they are independent. > - the background color is drawn behind the image (in whatever pixels are transparent) As laid out by @benfrankel, this involves: 1. Changing the default `UiImage` to use a transparent texture but a pure white tint. 2. Adding `UiImage::solid_color` to quickly set placeholder images. 3. Changing the default `BorderColor` and `BackgroundColor` to transparent. 4. Removing the default overrides for these values in the other assorted UI bundles. 5. Adding `BackgroundColor` back to `ImageBundle` and `ButtonBundle`. 6. Adding a 1x1 `Image::transparent`, which can be accessed from `Assets<Image>` via the `TRANSPARENT_IMAGE_HANDLE` constant. Huge thanks to everyone who helped out with the design in the linked issue and [the Discord thread](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1255209923890118697/1255209999278280844): this was very much a joint design. @cart helped me figure out how to set the UiImage's default texture to a transparent 1x1 image, which is a much nicer fix. ## Testing I've checked the examples modified by this PR, and the `ui` example as well just to be sure. ## Migration Guide - `BackgroundColor` no longer tints the color of images in `ImageBundle` or `ButtonBundle`. Set `UiImage::color` to tint images instead. - The default texture for `UiImage` is now a transparent white square. Use `UiImage::solid_color` to quickly draw debug images. - The default value for `BackgroundColor` and `BorderColor` is now transparent. Set the color to white manually to return to previous behavior. |
||
|
Ben Frankel
|
e8ae0d6c49
|
Decouple BackgroundColor from UiImage (#11165)
# Objective Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/11157. ## Solution Stop using `BackgroundColor` as a color tint for `UiImage`. Add a `UiImage::color` field for color tint instead. Allow a UI node to simultaneously include a solid-color background and an image, with the image rendered on top of the background (this is already how it works for e.g. text).  --- ## Changelog - The `BackgroundColor` component now renders a solid-color background behind `UiImage` instead of tinting its color. - Removed `BackgroundColor` from `ImageBundle`, `AtlasImageBundle`, and `ButtonBundle`. - Added `UiImage::color`. - Expanded `RenderUiSystem` variants. - Renamed `bevy_ui::extract_text_uinodes` to `extract_uinodes_text` for consistency. ## Migration Guide - `BackgroundColor` no longer tints the color of UI images. Use `UiImage::color` for that instead. - For solid color buttons, replace `ButtonBundle { background_color: my_color.into(), ... }` with `ButtonBundle { image: UiImage::default().with_color(my_color), ... }`, and update button interaction systems to use `UiImage::color` instead of `BackgroundColor` as well. - `bevy_ui::RenderUiSystem::ExtractNode` has been split into `ExtractBackgrounds`, `ExtractImages`, `ExtractBorders`, and `ExtractText`. - `bevy_ui::extract_uinodes` has been split into `bevy_ui::extract_uinode_background_colors` and `bevy_ui::extract_uinode_images`. - `bevy_ui::extract_text_uinodes` has been renamed to `extract_uinode_text`. |
||
|
Alice Cecile
|
599e5e4e76
|
Migrate from LegacyColor to bevy_color::Color (#12163)
# Objective - As part of the migration process we need to a) see the end effect of the migration on user ergonomics b) check for serious perf regressions c) actually migrate the code - To accomplish this, I'm going to attempt to migrate all of the remaining user-facing usages of `LegacyColor` in one PR, being careful to keep a clean commit history. - Fixes #12056. ## Solution I've chosen to use the polymorphic `Color` type as our standard user-facing API. - [x] Migrate `bevy_gizmos`. - [x] Take `impl Into<Color>` in all `bevy_gizmos` APIs - [x] Migrate sprites - [x] Migrate UI - [x] Migrate `ColorMaterial` - [x] Migrate `MaterialMesh2D` - [x] Migrate fog - [x] Migrate lights - [x] Migrate StandardMaterial - [x] Migrate wireframes - [x] Migrate clear color - [x] Migrate text - [x] Migrate gltf loader - [x] Register color types for reflection - [x] Remove `LegacyColor` - [x] Make sure CI passes Incidental improvements to ease migration: - added `Color::srgba_u8`, `Color::srgba_from_array` and friends - added `set_alpha`, `is_fully_transparent` and `is_fully_opaque` to the `Alpha` trait - add and immediately deprecate (lol) `Color::rgb` and friends in favor of more explicit and consistent `Color::srgb` - standardized on white and black for most example text colors - added vector field traits to `LinearRgba`: ~~`Add`, `Sub`, `AddAssign`, `SubAssign`,~~ `Mul<f32>` and `Div<f32>`. Multiplications and divisions do not scale alpha. `Add` and `Sub` have been cut from this PR. - added `LinearRgba` and `Srgba` `RED/GREEN/BLUE` - added `LinearRgba_to_f32_array` and `LinearRgba::to_u32` ## Migration Guide Bevy's color types have changed! Wherever you used a `bevy::render::Color`, a `bevy::color::Color` is used instead. These are quite similar! Both are enums storing a color in a specific color space (or to be more precise, using a specific color model). However, each of the different color models now has its own type. TODO... - `Color::rgba`, `Color::rgb`, `Color::rbga_u8`, `Color::rgb_u8`, `Color::rgb_from_array` are now `Color::srgba`, `Color::srgb`, `Color::srgba_u8`, `Color::srgb_u8` and `Color::srgb_from_array`. - `Color::set_a` and `Color::a` is now `Color::set_alpha` and `Color::alpha`. These are part of the `Alpha` trait in `bevy_color`. - `Color::is_fully_transparent` is now part of the `Alpha` trait in `bevy_color` - `Color::r`, `Color::set_r`, `Color::with_r` and the equivalents for `g`, `b` `h`, `s` and `l` have been removed due to causing silent relatively expensive conversions. Convert your `Color` into the desired color space, perform your operations there, and then convert it back into a polymorphic `Color` enum. - `Color::hex` is now `Srgba::hex`. Call `.into` or construct a `Color::Srgba` variant manually to convert it. - `WireframeMaterial`, `ExtractedUiNode`, `ExtractedDirectionalLight`, `ExtractedPointLight`, `ExtractedSpotLight` and `ExtractedSprite` now store a `LinearRgba`, rather than a polymorphic `Color` - `Color::rgb_linear` and `Color::rgba_linear` are now `Color::linear_rgb` and `Color::linear_rgba` - The various CSS color constants are no longer stored directly on `Color`. Instead, they're defined in the `Srgba` color space, and accessed via `bevy::color::palettes::css`. Call `.into()` on them to convert them into a `Color` for quick debugging use, and consider using the much prettier `tailwind` palette for prototyping. - The `LIME_GREEN` color has been renamed to `LIMEGREEN` to comply with the standard naming. - Vector field arithmetic operations on `Color` (add, subtract, multiply and divide by a f32) have been removed. Instead, convert your colors into `LinearRgba` space, and perform your operations explicitly there. This is particularly relevant when working with emissive or HDR colors, whose color channel values are routinely outside of the ordinary 0 to 1 range. - `Color::as_linear_rgba_f32` has been removed. Call `LinearRgba::to_f32_array` instead, converting if needed. - `Color::as_linear_rgba_u32` has been removed. Call `LinearRgba::to_u32` instead, converting if needed. - Several other color conversion methods to transform LCH or HSL colors into float arrays or `Vec` types have been removed. Please reimplement these externally or open a PR to re-add them if you found them particularly useful. - Various methods on `Color` such as `rgb` or `hsl` to convert the color into a specific color space have been removed. Convert into `LinearRgba`, then to the color space of your choice. - Various implicitly-converting color value methods on `Color` such as `r`, `g`, `b` or `h` have been removed. Please convert it into the color space of your choice, then check these properties. - `Color` no longer implements `AsBindGroup`. Store a `LinearRgba` internally instead to avoid conversion costs. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Afonso Lage <lage.afonso@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au> |
||
|
Alice Cecile
|
de004da8d5
|
Rename bevy_render::Color to LegacyColor (#12069)
# Objective The migration process for `bevy_color` (#12013) will be fairly involved: there will be hundreds of affected files, and a large number of APIs. ## Solution To allow us to proceed granularly, we're going to keep both `bevy_color::Color` (new) and `bevy_render::Color` (old) around until the migration is complete. However, simply doing this directly is confusing! They're both called `Color`, making it very hard to tell when a portion of the code has been ported. As discussed in #12056, by renaming the old `Color` type, we can make it easier to gradually migrate over, one API at a time. ## Migration Guide THIS MIGRATION GUIDE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. This change should not be shipped to end users: delete this section in the final migration guide! --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com> |
||
|
Zachary Harrold
|
1974723a63
|
Deprecated Various Component Methods from Query and QueryState (#9920)
# Objective - (Partially) Fixes #9904 - Acts on #9910 ## Solution - Deprecated the relevant methods from `Query`, cascading changes as required across Bevy. --- ## Changelog - Deprecated `QueryState::get_component_unchecked_mut` method - Deprecated `Query::get_component` method - Deprecated `Query::get_component_mut` method - Deprecated `Query::component` method - Deprecated `Query::component_mut` method - Deprecated `Query::get_component_unchecked_mut` method ## Migration Guide ### `QueryState::get_component_unchecked_mut` Use `QueryState::get_unchecked_manual` and select for the exact component based on the structure of the exact query as required. ### `Query::(get_)component(_unchecked)(_mut)` Use `Query::get` and select for the exact component based on the structure of the exact query as required. - For mutable access (`_mut`), use `Query::get_mut` - For unchecked access (`_unchecked`), use `Query::get_unchecked` - For panic variants (non-`get_`), add `.unwrap()` ## Notes - `QueryComponentError` can be removed once these deprecated methods are also removed. Due to an interaction with `thiserror`'s derive macro, it is not marked as deprecated. |
||
|
ickshonpe
|
166686e0f2
|
Rename TextAlignment to JustifyText. (#10854)
# Objective The name `TextAlignment` is really deceptive and almost every new user gets confused about the differences between aligning text with `TextAlignment`, aligning text with `Style` and aligning text with anchor (when using `Text2d`). ## Solution * Rename `TextAlignment` to `JustifyText`. The associated helper methods are also renamed. * Improve the doc comments for text explaining explicitly how the `JustifyText` component affects the arrangement of text. * Add some extra cases to the `text_debug` example that demonstate the differences between alignment using `JustifyText` and alignment using `Style`. <img width="757" alt="text_debug_2" src="https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/27962798/9d53e647-93f9-4bc7-8a20-0d9f783304d2"> --- ## Changelog * `TextAlignment` has been renamed to `JustifyText` * `TextBundle::with_text_alignment` has been renamed to `TextBundle::with_text_justify` * `Text::with_alignment` has been renamed to `Text::with_justify` * The `text_alignment` field of `TextMeasureInfo` has been renamed to `justification` ## Migration Guide * `TextAlignment` has been renamed to `JustifyText` * `TextBundle::with_text_alignment` has been renamed to `TextBundle::with_text_justify` * `Text::with_alignment` has been renamed to `Text::with_justify` * The `text_alignment` field of `TextMeasureInfo` has been renamed to `justification` |
||
|
Nico Burns
|
b995827013
|
Have a separate implicit viewport node per root node + make viewport node Display::Grid (#9637)
# Objective Make `bevy_ui` "root" nodes more intuitive to use/style by: - Removing the implicit flexbox styling (such as stretch alignment) that is applied to them, and replacing it with more intuitive CSS Grid styling (notably with stretch alignment disabled in both axes). - Making root nodes layout independently of each other. Instead of there being a single implicit "viewport" node that all root nodes are children of, there is now an implicit "viewport" node *per root node*. And layout of each tree is computed separately. ## Solution - Remove the global implicit viewport node, and instead create an implicit viewport node for each user-specified root node. - Keep track of both the user-specified root nodes and the implicit viewport nodes in a separate `Vec`. - Use the window's size as the `available_space` parameter to `Taffy.compute_layout` rather than setting it on the implicit viewport node (and set the viewport to `height: 100%; width: 100%` to make this "just work"). --- ## Changelog - Bevy UI now lays out root nodes independently of each other in separate layout contexts. - The implicit viewport node (which contains each user-specified root node) is now `Display::Grid` with `align_items` and `justify_items` both set to `Start`. ## Migration Guide - Bevy UI now lays out root nodes independently of each other in separate layout contexts. If you were relying on your root nodes being able to affect each other's layouts, then you may need to wrap them in a single root node. - The implicit viewport node (which contains each user-specified root node) is now `Display::Grid` with `align_items` and `justify_items` both set to `Start`. You may need to add `height: Val::Percent(100.)` to your root nodes if you were previously relying on being implicitly set. |
||
|
lelo
|
42e6dc8987
|
Refactor EventReader::iter to read (#9631)
# Objective - The current `EventReader::iter` has been determined to cause confusion among new Bevy users. It was suggested by @JoJoJet to rename the method to better clarify its usage. - Solves #9624 ## Solution - Rename `EventReader::iter` to `EventReader::read`. - Rename `EventReader::iter_with_id` to `EventReader::read_with_id`. - Rename `ManualEventReader::iter` to `ManualEventReader::read`. - Rename `ManualEventReader::iter_with_id` to `ManualEventReader::read_with_id`. --- ## Changelog - `EventReader::iter` has been renamed to `EventReader::read`. - `EventReader::iter_with_id` has been renamed to `EventReader::read_with_id`. - `ManualEventReader::iter` has been renamed to `ManualEventReader::read`. - `ManualEventReader::iter_with_id` has been renamed to `ManualEventReader::read_with_id`. - Deprecated `EventReader::iter` - Deprecated `EventReader::iter_with_id` - Deprecated `ManualEventReader::iter` - Deprecated `ManualEventReader::iter_with_id` ## Migration Guide - Existing usages of `EventReader::iter` and `EventReader::iter_with_id` will have to be changed to `EventReader::read` and `EventReader::read_with_id` respectively. - Existing usages of `ManualEventReader::iter` and `ManualEventReader::iter_with_id` will have to be changed to `ManualEventReader::read` and `ManualEventReader::read_with_id` respectively. |
||
|
ClayenKitten
|
ffc572728f
|
Fix typos throughout the project (#9090)
# Objective
Fix typos throughout the project.
## Solution
[`typos`](https://github.com/crate-ci/typos) project was used for
scanning, but no automatic corrections were applied. I checked
everything by hand before fixing.
Most of the changes are documentation/comments corrections. Also, there
are few trivial changes to code (variable name, pub(crate) function name
and a few error/panic messages).
## Unsolved
`bevy_reflect_derive` has
[typo](
|
||
|
Anby
|
7f1d084b71
|
Rename Interaction::Clicked -> Interaction::Pressed (#8989) (#9027)
# Objective - Fixes #8989 ## Solution - Renamed Interaction::Clicked -> Interaction::Pressed - Minor changes to comments to keep clarity of terms ## Migration Guide - Rename all instances of Interaction::Clicked -> Interaction::Pressed |
||
|
CatThingy
|
89cbc78d3d
|
Require #[derive(Event)] on all Events (#7086)
# Objective Be consistent with `Resource`s and `Components` and have `Event` types be more self-documenting. Although not susceptible to accidentally using a function instead of a value due to `Event`s only being initialized by their type, much of the same reasoning for removing the blanket impl on `Resource` also applies here. * Not immediately obvious if a type is intended to be an event * Prevent invisible conflicts if the same third-party or primitive types are used as events * Allows for further extensions (e.g. opt-in warning for missed events) ## Solution Remove the blanket impl for the `Event` trait. Add a derive macro for it. --- ## Changelog - `Event` is no longer implemented for all applicable types. Add the `#[derive(Event)]` macro for events. ## Migration Guide * Add the `#[derive(Event)]` macro for events. Third-party types used as events should be wrapped in a newtype. |
||
|
Nico Burns
|
08bf1a6c2e
|
Flatten UI Style properties that use Size + remove Size (#8548)
# Objective - Simplify API and make authoring styles easier See: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/8540#issuecomment-1536177102 ## Solution - The `size`, `min_size`, `max_size`, and `gap` properties have been replaced by `width`, `height`, `min_width`, `min_height`, `max_width`, `max_height`, `row_gap`, and `column_gap` properties --- ## Changelog - Flattened `Style` properties that have a `Size` value directly into `Style` ## Migration Guide - The `size`, `min_size`, `max_size`, and `gap` properties have been replaced by the `width`, `height`, `min_width`, `min_height`, `max_width`, `max_height`, `row_gap`, and `column_gap` properties. Use the new properties instead. --------- Co-authored-by: ickshonpe <david.curthoys@googlemail.com> |
||
|
ickshonpe
|
f3360938eb
|
Size Constraints Example (#7956)
# Objective Add a simple example demonstrating how to use size constraints. Related to #7946 # Solution <img width="827" alt="Capture" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27962798/223741566-4b8eca99-c450-42b5-a40e-a414858c8310.PNG"> # Changelog * Added the example `size_constraints` |
