b911a005d9
# Objective Beginners semi-regularly appear on the Discord asking for help with using `QuerySet` when they have a system with conflicting data access. This happens because the Resulting Panic message only mentions `QuerySet` as a solution, even if in most cases `Without<T>` was enough to solve the problem. ## Solution Mention the usage of `Without<T>` to create disjoint queries as an alternative to `QuerySet` ## Open Questions - Is `disjoint` a too technical/mathematical word? - Should `Without<T>` be mentioned before or after `QuerySet`? - Before: Using `Without<T>` should be preferred and mentioning it first reinforces this for a reader. - After: The Panics can be very long and a Reader could skip to end and only see the `QuerySet` Co-authored-by: MinerSebas <66798382+MinerSebas@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| commands.rs | ||
| exclusive_system.rs | ||
| function_system.rs | ||
| mod.rs | ||
| query.rs | ||
| system_chaining.rs | ||
| system_param.rs | ||
| system.rs | ||