![]() This adds support for one-to-many non-fragmenting relationships (with planned paths for fragmenting and non-fragmenting many-to-many relationships). "Non-fragmenting" means that entities with the same relationship type, but different relationship targets, are not forced into separate tables (which would cause "table fragmentation"). Functionally, this fills a similar niche as the current Parent/Children system. The biggest differences are: 1. Relationships have simpler internals and significantly improved performance and UX. Commands and specialized APIs are no longer necessary to keep everything in sync. Just spawn entities with the relationship components you want and everything "just works". 2. Relationships are generalized. Bevy can provide additional built in relationships, and users can define their own. **REQUEST TO REVIEWERS**: _please don't leave top level comments and instead comment on specific lines of code. That way we can take advantage of threaded discussions. Also dont leave comments simply pointing out CI failures as I can read those just fine._ ## Built on top of what we have Relationships are implemented on top of the Bevy ECS features we already have: components, immutability, and hooks. This makes them immediately compatible with all of our existing (and future) APIs for querying, spawning, removing, scenes, reflection, etc. The fewer specialized APIs we need to build, maintain, and teach, the better. ## Why focus on one-to-many non-fragmenting first? 1. This allows us to improve Parent/Children relationships immediately, in a way that is reasonably uncontroversial. Switching our hierarchy to fragmenting relationships would have significant performance implications. ~~Flecs is heavily considering a switch to non-fragmenting relations after careful considerations of the performance tradeoffs.~~ _(Correction from @SanderMertens: Flecs is implementing non-fragmenting storage specialized for asset hierarchies, where asset hierarchies are many instances of small trees that have a well defined structure)_ 2. Adding generalized one-to-many relationships is currently a priority for the [Next Generation Scene / UI effort](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437). Specifically, we're interested in building reactions and observers on top. ## The changes This PR does the following: 1. Adds a generic one-to-many Relationship system 3. Ports the existing Parent/Children system to Relationships, which now lives in `bevy_ecs::hierarchy`. The old `bevy_hierarchy` crate has been removed. 4. Adds on_despawn component hooks 5. Relationships can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior, meaning that the entire relationship hierarchy is despawned when `entity.despawn()` is called. The built in Parent/Children hierarchies enable this behavior, and `entity.despawn_recursive()` has been removed. 6. `world.spawn` now applies commands after spawning. This ensures that relationship bookkeeping happens immediately and removes the need to manually flush. This is in line with the equivalent behaviors recently added to the other APIs (ex: insert). 7. Removes the ValidParentCheckPlugin (system-driven / poll based) in favor of a `validate_parent_has_component` hook. ## Using Relationships The `Relationship` trait looks like this: ```rust pub trait Relationship: Component + Sized { type RelationshipSources: RelationshipSources<Relationship = Self>; fn get(&self) -> Entity; fn from(entity: Entity) -> Self; } ``` A relationship is a component that: 1. Is a simple wrapper over a "target" Entity. 2. Has a corresponding `RelationshipSources` component, which is a simple wrapper over a collection of entities. Every "target entity" targeted by a "source entity" with a `Relationship` has a `RelationshipSources` component, which contains every "source entity" that targets it. For example, the `Parent` component (as it currently exists in Bevy) is the `Relationship` component and the entity containing the Parent is the "source entity". The entity _inside_ the `Parent(Entity)` component is the "target entity". And that target entity has a `Children` component (which implements `RelationshipSources`). In practice, the Parent/Children relationship looks like this: ```rust #[derive(Relationship)] #[relationship(relationship_sources = Children)] pub struct Parent(pub Entity); #[derive(RelationshipSources)] #[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent)] pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>); ``` The Relationship and RelationshipSources derives automatically implement Component with the relevant configuration (namely, the hooks necessary to keep everything in sync). The most direct way to add relationships is to spawn entities with relationship components: ```rust let a = world.spawn_empty().id(); let b = world.spawn(Parent(a)).id(); assert_eq!(world.entity(a).get::<Children>().unwrap(), &[b]); ``` There are also convenience APIs for spawning more than one entity with the same relationship: ```rust world.spawn_empty().with_related::<Children>(|s| { s.spawn_empty(); s.spawn_empty(); }) ``` The existing `with_children` API is now a simpler wrapper over `with_related`. This makes this change largely non-breaking for existing spawn patterns. ```rust world.spawn_empty().with_children(|s| { s.spawn_empty(); s.spawn_empty(); }) ``` There are also other relationship APIs, such as `add_related` and `despawn_related`. ## Automatic recursive despawn via the new on_despawn hook `RelationshipSources` can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior, which will despawn all related entities in the relationship hierarchy: ```rust #[derive(RelationshipSources)] #[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent, despawn_descendants)] pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>); ``` This means that `entity.despawn_recursive()` is no longer required. Instead, just use `entity.despawn()` and the relevant related entities will also be despawned. To despawn an entity _without_ despawning its parent/child descendants, you should remove the `Children` component first, which will also remove the related `Parent` components: ```rust entity .remove::<Children>() .despawn() ``` This builds on the on_despawn hook introduced in this PR, which is fired when an entity is despawned (before other hooks). ## Relationships are the source of truth `Relationship` is the _single_ source of truth component. `RelationshipSources` is merely a reflection of what all the `Relationship` components say. By embracing this, we are able to significantly improve the performance of the system as a whole. We can rely on component lifecycles to protect us against duplicates, rather than needing to scan at runtime to ensure entities don't already exist (which results in quadratic runtime). A single source of truth gives us constant-time inserts. This does mean that we cannot directly spawn populated `Children` components (or directly add or remove entities from those components). I personally think this is a worthwhile tradeoff, both because it makes the performance much better _and_ because it means theres exactly one way to do things (which is a philosophy we try to employ for Bevy APIs). As an aside: treating both sides of the relationship as "equivalent source of truth relations" does enable building simple and flexible many-to-many relationships. But this introduces an _inherent_ need to scan (or hash) to protect against duplicates. [`evergreen_relations`](https://github.com/EvergreenNest/evergreen_relations) has a very nice implementation of the "symmetrical many-to-many" approach. Unfortunately I think the performance issues inherent to that approach make it a poor choice for Bevy's default relationship system. ## Followup Work * Discuss renaming `Parent` to `ChildOf`. I refrained from doing that in this PR to keep the diff reasonable, but I'm personally biased toward this change (and using that naming pattern generally for relationships). * [Improved spawning ergonomics](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/16920) * Consider adding relationship observers/triggers for "relationship targets" whenever a source is added or removed. This would replace the current "hierarchy events" system, which is unused upstream but may have existing users downstream. I think triggers are the better fit for this than a buffered event queue, and would prefer not to add that back. * Fragmenting relations: My current idea hinges on the introduction of "value components" (aka: components whose type _and_ value determines their ComponentId, via something like Hashing / PartialEq). By labeling a Relationship component such as `ChildOf(Entity)` as a "value component", `ChildOf(e1)` and `ChildOf(e2)` would be considered "different components". This makes the transition between fragmenting and non-fragmenting a single flag, and everything else continues to work as expected. * Many-to-many support * Non-fragmenting: We can expand Relationship to be a list of entities instead of a single entity. I have largely already written the code for this. * Fragmenting: With the "value component" impl mentioned above, we get many-to-many support "for free", as it would allow inserting multiple copies of a Relationship component with different target entities. Fixes #3742 (If this PR is merged, I think we should open more targeted followup issues for the work above, with a fresh tracking issue free of the large amount of less-directed historical context) Fixes #17301 Fixes #12235 Fixes #15299 Fixes #15308 ## Migration Guide * Replace `ChildBuilder` with `ChildSpawnerCommands`. * Replace calls to `.set_parent(parent_id)` with `.insert(Parent(parent_id))`. * Replace calls to `.replace_children()` with `.remove::<Children>()` followed by `.add_children()`. Note that you'll need to manually despawn any children that are not carried over. * Replace calls to `.despawn_recursive()` with `.despawn()`. * Replace calls to `.despawn_descendants()` with `.despawn_related::<Children>()`. * If you have any calls to `.despawn()` which depend on the children being preserved, you'll need to remove the `Children` component first. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
compile_fail | ||
examples | ||
macros | ||
src | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
README.md |
Bevy ECS
What is Bevy ECS?
Bevy ECS is an Entity Component System custom-built for the Bevy game engine. It aims to be simple to use, ergonomic, fast, massively parallel, opinionated, and featureful. It was created specifically for Bevy's needs, but it can easily be used as a standalone crate in other projects.
ECS
All app logic in Bevy uses the Entity Component System paradigm, which is often shortened to ECS. ECS is a software pattern that involves breaking your program up into Entities, Components, and Systems. Entities are unique "things" that are assigned groups of Components, which are then processed using Systems.
For example, one entity might have a Position
and Velocity
component, whereas another entity might have a Position
and UI
component. You might have a movement system that runs on all entities with a Position and Velocity component.
The ECS pattern encourages clean, decoupled designs by forcing you to break up your app data and logic into its core components. It also helps make your code faster by optimizing memory access patterns and making parallelism easier.
Concepts
Bevy ECS is Bevy's implementation of the ECS pattern. Unlike other Rust ECS implementations, which often require complex lifetimes, traits, builder patterns, or macros, Bevy ECS uses normal Rust data types for all of these concepts:
Components
Components are normal Rust structs. They are data stored in a World
and specific instances of Components correlate to Entities.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
Worlds
Entities, Components, and Resources are stored in a World
. Worlds, much like std::collections
's HashSet
and Vec
, expose operations to insert, read, write, and remove the data they store.
use bevy_ecs::world::World;
let world = World::default();
Entities
Entities are unique identifiers that correlate to zero or more Components.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
let mut world = World::new();
let entity = world
.spawn((Position { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 }, Velocity { x: 1.0, y: 0.0 }))
.id();
let entity_ref = world.entity(entity);
let position = entity_ref.get::<Position>().unwrap();
let velocity = entity_ref.get::<Velocity>().unwrap();
Systems
Systems are normal Rust functions. Thanks to the Rust type system, Bevy ECS can use function parameter types to determine what data needs to be sent to the system. It also uses this "data access" information to determine what Systems can run in parallel with each other.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
fn print_position(query: Query<(Entity, &Position)>) {
for (entity, position) in &query {
println!("Entity {} is at position: x {}, y {}", entity, position.x, position.y);
}
}
Resources
Apps often require unique resources, such as asset collections, renderers, audio servers, time, etc. Bevy ECS makes this pattern a first class citizen. Resource
is a special kind of component that does not belong to any entity. Instead, it is identified uniquely by its type:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Resource, Default)]
struct Time {
seconds: f32,
}
let mut world = World::new();
world.insert_resource(Time::default());
let time = world.get_resource::<Time>().unwrap();
// You can also access resources from Systems
fn print_time(time: Res<Time>) {
println!("{}", time.seconds);
}
Schedules
Schedules run a set of Systems according to some execution strategy. Systems can be added to any number of System Sets, which are used to control their scheduling metadata.
The built in "parallel executor" considers dependencies between systems and (by default) run as many of them in parallel as possible. This maximizes performance, while keeping the system execution safe. To control the system ordering, define explicit dependencies between systems and their sets.
Using Bevy ECS
Bevy ECS should feel very natural for those familiar with Rust syntax:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
// This system moves each entity with a Position and Velocity component
fn movement(mut query: Query<(&mut Position, &Velocity)>) {
for (mut position, velocity) in &mut query {
position.x += velocity.x;
position.y += velocity.y;
}
}
fn main() {
// Create a new empty World to hold our Entities and Components
let mut world = World::new();
// Spawn an entity with Position and Velocity components
world.spawn((
Position { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 },
Velocity { x: 1.0, y: 0.0 },
));
// Create a new Schedule, which defines an execution strategy for Systems
let mut schedule = Schedule::default();
// Add our system to the schedule
schedule.add_systems(movement);
// Run the schedule once. If your app has a "loop", you would run this once per loop
schedule.run(&mut world);
}
Features
Query Filters
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Player;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Alive;
// Gets the Position component of all Entities with Player component and without the Alive
// component.
fn system(query: Query<&Position, (With<Player>, Without<Alive>)>) {
for position in &query {
}
}
Change Detection
Bevy ECS tracks all changes to Components and Resources.
Queries can filter for changed Components:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
// Gets the Position component of all Entities whose Velocity has changed since the last run of the System
fn system_changed(query: Query<&Position, Changed<Velocity>>) {
for position in &query {
}
}
// Gets the Position component of all Entities that had a Velocity component added since the last run of the System
fn system_added(query: Query<&Position, Added<Velocity>>) {
for position in &query {
}
}
Resources also expose change state:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Resource)]
struct Time(f32);
// Prints "time changed!" if the Time resource has changed since the last run of the System
fn system(time: Res<Time>) {
if time.is_changed() {
println!("time changed!");
}
}
Component Storage
Bevy ECS supports multiple component storage types.
Components can be stored in:
- Tables: Fast and cache friendly iteration, but slower adding and removing of components. This is the default storage type.
- Sparse Sets: Fast adding and removing of components, but slower iteration.
Component storage types are configurable, and they default to table storage if the storage is not manually defined.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct TableStoredComponent;
#[derive(Component)]
#[component(storage = "SparseSet")]
struct SparseStoredComponent;
Component Bundles
Define sets of Components that should be added together.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Player;
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Bundle, Default)]
struct PlayerBundle {
player: Player,
position: Position,
velocity: Velocity,
}
let mut world = World::new();
// Spawn a new entity and insert the default PlayerBundle
world.spawn(PlayerBundle::default());
// Bundles play well with Rust's struct update syntax
world.spawn(PlayerBundle {
position: Position { x: 1.0, y: 1.0 },
..Default::default()
});
Events
Events offer a communication channel between one or more systems. Events can be sent using the system parameter EventWriter
and received with EventReader
.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Event)]
struct MyEvent {
message: String,
}
fn writer(mut writer: EventWriter<MyEvent>) {
writer.send(MyEvent {
message: "hello!".to_string(),
});
}
fn reader(mut reader: EventReader<MyEvent>) {
for event in reader.read() {
}
}
Observers
Observers are systems that listen for a "trigger" of a specific Event
:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Event)]
struct MyEvent {
message: String
}
let mut world = World::new();
world.add_observer(|trigger: Trigger<MyEvent>| {
println!("{}", trigger.event().message);
});
world.flush();
world.trigger(MyEvent {
message: "hello!".to_string(),
});
These differ from EventReader
and EventWriter
in that they are "reactive". Rather than happening at a specific point in a schedule, they happen immediately whenever a trigger happens. Triggers can trigger other triggers, and they all will be evaluated at the same time!
Events can also be triggered to target specific entities:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Event)]
struct Explode;
let mut world = World::new();
let entity = world.spawn_empty().id();
world.add_observer(|trigger: Trigger<Explode>, mut commands: Commands| {
println!("Entity {} goes BOOM!", trigger.target());
commands.entity(trigger.target()).despawn();
});
world.flush();
world.trigger_targets(Explode, entity);