![]() # Objective Further tests after #19326 showed that configuring `EntityCloner` with required components is bug prone and the current design has several weaknesses in it's API: - Mixing `EntityClonerBuilder::allow` and `EntityClonerBuilder::deny` requires extra care how to support that which has an impact on surrounding code that has to keep edge cases in mind. This is especially true for attempts to fix the following issues. There is no use-case known (to me) why someone would mix those. - A builder with `EntityClonerBuilder::allow_all` configuration tries to support required components like `EntityClonerBuilder::deny_all` does, but the meaning of that is conflicting with how you'd expect things to work: - If all components should be cloned except component `A`, do you also want to exclude required components of `A` too? Or are these also valid without `A` at the target entity? - If `EntityClonerBuilder::allow_all` should ignore required components and not add them to be filtered away, which purpose has `EntityClonerBuilder::without_required_components` for this cloner? - Other bugs found with the linked PR are: - Denying `A` also denies required components of `A` even when `A` does not exist at the source entity - Allowing `A` also allows required components of `A` even when `A` does not exist at the source entity - Adding `allow_if_new` filters to the cloner faces the same issues and require a common solution to dealing with source-archetype sensitive cloning Alternative to #19632 and #19635. # Solution `EntityClonerBuilder` is made generic and split into `EntityClonerBuilder<OptOut>` and `EntityClonerBuilder<OptIn>` For an overview of the changes, see the migration guide. It is generally a good idea to start a review of that. ## Algorithm The generic of `EntityClonerBuilder` contains the filter data that is needed to build and clone the entity components. As the filter needs to be borrowed mutably for the duration of the clone, the borrow checker forced me to separate the filter value and all other fields in `EntityCloner`. The latter are now in the `EntityClonerConfig` struct. This caused many changed LOC, sorry. To make reviewing easier: 1. Check the migration guide 2. Many methods of `EntityCloner` now just call identitcal `EntityClonerConfig` methods with a mutable borrow of the filter 3. Check `EntityClonerConfig::clone_entity_internal` which changed a bit regarding the filter usage that is now trait powered (`CloneByFilter`) to support `OptOut`, `OptIn` and `EntityClonerFilter` (an enum combining the first two) 4. Check `OptOut` type that no longer tracks required components but has a `insert_mode` field 5. Check `OptIn` type that has the most logic changes # Testing I added a bunch of tests that cover the new logic parts and the fixed issues. Benchmarks are in a comment a bit below which shows ~4% to 9% regressions, but it varied wildly for me. For example at one run the reflection-based clonings were on-par with main while the other are not, and redoing that swapped the situation for both. It would be really cool if I could get some hints how to get better benchmark results or if you could run them on your machine too. Just be aware this is not a Performance PR but a Bugfix PR, even if I smuggled in some more functionalities. So doing changes to `EntityClonerBuilder` is kind of required here which might make us bite the bullet. --------- Co-authored-by: eugineerd <70062110+eugineerd@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
benches | ||
src | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
README.md |
Bevy Benchmarks
This is a crate with a collection of benchmarks for Bevy.
Running benchmarks
Benchmarks can be run through Cargo:
# Run all benchmarks. (This will take a while!)
cargo bench -p benches
# Just compile the benchmarks, do not run them.
cargo bench -p benches --no-run
# Run the benchmarks for a specific crate. (See `Cargo.toml` for a complete list of crates
# tracked.)
cargo bench -p benches --bench ecs
# Filter which benchmarks are run based on the name. This will only run benchmarks whose name
# contains "name_fragment".
cargo bench -p benches -- name_fragment
# List all available benchmarks.
cargo bench -p benches -- --list
# Save a baseline to be compared against later.
cargo bench -p benches -- --save-baseline before
# Compare the current benchmarks against a baseline to find performance gains and regressions.
cargo bench -p benches -- --baseline before
Criterion
Bevy's benchmarks use Criterion. If you want to learn more about using Criterion for comparing performance against a baseline or generating detailed reports, you can read the Criterion.rs documentation.