# Objective - Follow up of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/7267 ## Solution - Rename schedule_v3 to schedule - Suppress "module inception" lint
		
			
				
	
	
		
			93 lines
		
	
	
		
			3.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Rust
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			93 lines
		
	
	
		
			3.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Rust
		
	
	
	
	
	
//! By default, Bevy systems run in parallel with each other.
 | 
						|
//! Unless the order is explicitly specified, their relative order is nondeterministic.
 | 
						|
//!
 | 
						|
//! In many cases, this doesn't matter and is in fact desirable!
 | 
						|
//! Consider two systems, one which writes to resource A, and the other which writes to resource B.
 | 
						|
//! By allowing their order to be arbitrary, we can evaluate them greedily, based on the data that is free.
 | 
						|
//! Because their data accesses are **compatible**, there is no **observable** difference created based on the order they are run.
 | 
						|
//!
 | 
						|
//! But if instead we have two systems mutating the same data, or one reading it and the other mutating,
 | 
						|
//! then the actual observed value will vary based on the nondeterministic order of evaluation.
 | 
						|
//! These observable conflicts are called **system execution order ambiguities**.
 | 
						|
//!
 | 
						|
//! This example demonstrates how you might detect and resolve (or silence) these ambiguities.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
use bevy::{
 | 
						|
    ecs::schedule::{LogLevel, ScheduleBuildSettings},
 | 
						|
    prelude::*,
 | 
						|
};
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
fn main() {
 | 
						|
    App::new()
 | 
						|
        // We can modify the reporting strategy for system execution order ambiguities on a per-schedule basis
 | 
						|
        .edit_schedule(CoreSchedule::Main, |schedule| {
 | 
						|
            schedule.set_build_settings(
 | 
						|
                ScheduleBuildSettings::new().with_ambiguity_detection(LogLevel::Warn),
 | 
						|
            );
 | 
						|
        })
 | 
						|
        .init_resource::<A>()
 | 
						|
        .init_resource::<B>()
 | 
						|
        // This pair of systems has an ambiguous order,
 | 
						|
        // as their data access conflicts, and there's no order between them.
 | 
						|
        .add_system(reads_a)
 | 
						|
        .add_system(writes_a)
 | 
						|
        // This pair of systems has conflicting data access,
 | 
						|
        // but it's resolved with an explicit ordering:
 | 
						|
        // the .after relationship here means that we will always double after adding.
 | 
						|
        .add_system(adds_one_to_b)
 | 
						|
        .add_system(doubles_b.after(adds_one_to_b))
 | 
						|
        // This system isn't ambiguous with adds_one_to_b,
 | 
						|
        // due to the transitive ordering created by our constraints:
 | 
						|
        // if A is before B is before C, then A must be before C as well.
 | 
						|
        .add_system(reads_b.after(doubles_b))
 | 
						|
        // This system will conflict with all of our writing systems
 | 
						|
        // but we've silenced its ambiguity with adds_one_to_b.
 | 
						|
        // This should only be done in the case of clear false positives:
 | 
						|
        // leave a comment in your code justifying the decision!
 | 
						|
        .add_system(reads_a_and_b.ambiguous_with(adds_one_to_b))
 | 
						|
        // Be mindful, internal ambiguities are reported too!
 | 
						|
        // If there are any ambiguities due solely to DefaultPlugins,
 | 
						|
        // or between DefaultPlugins and any of your third party plugins,
 | 
						|
        // please file a bug with the repo responsible!
 | 
						|
        // Only *you* can prevent nondeterministic bugs due to greedy parallelism.
 | 
						|
        .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
 | 
						|
        .run();
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
#[derive(Resource, Debug, Default)]
 | 
						|
struct A(usize);
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
#[derive(Resource, Debug, Default)]
 | 
						|
struct B(usize);
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
// Data access is determined solely on the basis of the types of the system's parameters
 | 
						|
// Every implementation of the `SystemParam` and `WorldQuery` traits must declare which data is used
 | 
						|
// and whether or not it is mutably accessed.
 | 
						|
fn reads_a(_a: Res<A>) {}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
fn writes_a(mut a: ResMut<A>) {
 | 
						|
    a.0 += 1;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
fn adds_one_to_b(mut b: ResMut<B>) {
 | 
						|
    b.0 = b.0.saturating_add(1);
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
fn doubles_b(mut b: ResMut<B>) {
 | 
						|
    // This will overflow pretty rapidly otherwise
 | 
						|
    b.0 = b.0.saturating_mul(2);
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
fn reads_b(b: Res<B>) {
 | 
						|
    // This invariant is always true,
 | 
						|
    // because we've fixed the system order so doubling always occurs after adding.
 | 
						|
    assert!((b.0 % 2 == 0) || (b.0 == usize::MAX));
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
fn reads_a_and_b(a: Res<A>, b: Res<B>) {
 | 
						|
    // Only display the first few steps to avoid burying the ambiguities in the console
 | 
						|
    if b.0 < 10 {
 | 
						|
        info!("{}, {}", a.0, b.0);
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
}
 |