![]() # Objective Fixes #15367. Currently, required components can only be defined through the `require` macro attribute. While this should be used in most cases, there are also several instances where you may want to define requirements at runtime, commonly in plugins. Example use cases: - Require components only if the relevant optional plugins are enabled. For example, a `SleepTimer` component (for physics) is only relevant if the `SleepPlugin` is enabled. - Third party crates can define their own requirements for first party types. For example, "each `Handle<Mesh>` should require my custom rendering data components". This also gets around the orphan rule. - Generic plugins that add marker components based on the existence of other components, like a generic `ColliderPlugin<C: AnyCollider>` that wants to add a `ColliderMarker` component for all types of colliders. - This is currently relevant for the retained render world in #15320. The `ExtractComponentPlugin<C>` should add `SyncToRenderWorld` to all components that should be extracted. This is currently done with observers, which is more expensive than required components, and causes archetype moves. - Replace some built-in components with custom versions. For example, if `GlobalTransform` required `Transform` through `TransformPlugin`, but we wanted to use a `CustomTransform` type, we could replace `TransformPlugin` with our own plugin. (This specific example isn't good, but there are likely better use cases where this may be useful) See #15367 for more in-depth reasoning. ## Solution Add `register_required_components::<T, R>` and `register_required_components_with::<T, R>` methods for `Default` and custom constructors respectively. These methods exist on `App` and `World`. ```rust struct BirdPlugin; impl Plugin for BirdPlugin { fn plugin(app: &mut App) { // Make `Bird` require `Wings` with a `Default` constructor. app.register_required_components::<Bird, Wings>(); // Make `Wings` require `FlapSpeed` with a custom constructor. // Fun fact: Some hummingbirds can flutter their wings 80 times per second! app.register_required_components_with::<Wings, FlapSpeed>(|| FlapSpeed::from_duration(1.0 / 80.0)); } } ``` The custom constructor is a function pointer to match the `require` API, though it could take a raw value too. Requirement inheritance works similarly as with the `require` attribute. If `Bird` required `FlapSpeed` directly, it would take precedence over indirectly requiring it through `Wings`. The same logic applies to all levels of the inheritance tree. Note that registering the same component requirement more than once will panic, similarly to trying to add multiple component hooks of the same type to the same component. This avoids constructor conflicts and confusing ordering issues. ### Implementation Runtime requirements have two additional challenges in comparison to the `require` attribute. 1. The `require` attribute uses recursion and macros with clever ordering to populate hash maps of required components for each component type. The expected semantics are that "more specific" requirements override ones deeper in the inheritance tree. However, at runtime, there is no representation of how "specific" each requirement is. 2. If you first register the requirement `X -> Y`, and later register `Y -> Z`, then `X` should also indirectly require `Z`. However, `Y` itself doesn't know that it is required by `X`, so it's not aware that it should update the list of required components for `X`. My solutions to these problems are: 1. Store the depth in the inheritance tree for each entry of a given component's `RequiredComponents`. This is used to determine how "specific" each requirement is. For `require`-based registration, these depths are computed as part of the recursion. 2. Store and maintain a `required_by` list in each component's `ComponentInfo`, next to `required_components`. For `require`-based registration, these are also added after each registration, as part of the recursion. When calling `register_required_components`, it works as follows: 1. Get the required components of `Foo`, and check that `Bar` isn't already a *direct* requirement. 3. Register `Bar` as a required component for `Foo`, and add `Foo` to the `required_by` list for `Bar`. 4. Find and register all indirect requirements inherited from `Bar`, adding `Foo` to the `required_by` list for each component. 5. Iterate through components that require `Foo`, registering the new inherited requires for them as indirect requirements. The runtime registration is likely slightly more expensive than the `require` version, but it is a one-time cost, and quite negligible in practice, unless projects have hundreds or thousands of runtime requirements. I have not benchmarked this however. This does also add a small amount of extra cost to the `require` attribute for updating `required_by` lists, but I expect it to be very minor. ## Testing I added some tests that are copies of the `require` versions, as well as some tests that are more specific to the runtime implementation. I might add a few more tests though. ## Discussion - Is `register_required_components` a good name? Originally I went for `register_component_requirement` to be consistent with `register_component_hooks`, but the general feature is often referred to as "required components", which is why I changed it to `register_required_components`. - Should we *not* panic for duplicate requirements? If so, should they just be ignored, or should the latest registration overwrite earlier ones? - If we do want to panic for duplicate, conflicting registrations, should we at least not panic if the registrations are *exactly* the same, i.e. same component and same constructor? The current implementation panics for all duplicate direct registrations regardless of the constructor. ## Next Steps - Allow `register_required_components` to take a `Bundle` instead of a single required component. - I could also try to do it in this PR if that would be preferable. - Not directly related, but archetype invariants? |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
compile_fail | ||
examples | ||
macros | ||
src | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
README.md |
Bevy ECS
What is Bevy ECS?
Bevy ECS is an Entity Component System custom-built for the Bevy game engine. It aims to be simple to use, ergonomic, fast, massively parallel, opinionated, and featureful. It was created specifically for Bevy's needs, but it can easily be used as a standalone crate in other projects.
ECS
All app logic in Bevy uses the Entity Component System paradigm, which is often shortened to ECS. ECS is a software pattern that involves breaking your program up into Entities, Components, and Systems. Entities are unique "things" that are assigned groups of Components, which are then processed using Systems.
For example, one entity might have a Position
and Velocity
component, whereas another entity might have a Position
and UI
component. You might have a movement system that runs on all entities with a Position and Velocity component.
The ECS pattern encourages clean, decoupled designs by forcing you to break up your app data and logic into its core components. It also helps make your code faster by optimizing memory access patterns and making parallelism easier.
Concepts
Bevy ECS is Bevy's implementation of the ECS pattern. Unlike other Rust ECS implementations, which often require complex lifetimes, traits, builder patterns, or macros, Bevy ECS uses normal Rust data types for all of these concepts:
Components
Components are normal Rust structs. They are data stored in a World
and specific instances of Components correlate to Entities.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
Worlds
Entities, Components, and Resources are stored in a World
. Worlds, much like std::collections
's HashSet
and Vec
, expose operations to insert, read, write, and remove the data they store.
use bevy_ecs::world::World;
let world = World::default();
Entities
Entities are unique identifiers that correlate to zero or more Components.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
let mut world = World::new();
let entity = world
.spawn((Position { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 }, Velocity { x: 1.0, y: 0.0 }))
.id();
let entity_ref = world.entity(entity);
let position = entity_ref.get::<Position>().unwrap();
let velocity = entity_ref.get::<Velocity>().unwrap();
Systems
Systems are normal Rust functions. Thanks to the Rust type system, Bevy ECS can use function parameter types to determine what data needs to be sent to the system. It also uses this "data access" information to determine what Systems can run in parallel with each other.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
fn print_position(query: Query<(Entity, &Position)>) {
for (entity, position) in &query {
println!("Entity {:?} is at position: x {}, y {}", entity, position.x, position.y);
}
}
Resources
Apps often require unique resources, such as asset collections, renderers, audio servers, time, etc. Bevy ECS makes this pattern a first class citizen. Resource
is a special kind of component that does not belong to any entity. Instead, it is identified uniquely by its type:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Resource, Default)]
struct Time {
seconds: f32,
}
let mut world = World::new();
world.insert_resource(Time::default());
let time = world.get_resource::<Time>().unwrap();
// You can also access resources from Systems
fn print_time(time: Res<Time>) {
println!("{}", time.seconds);
}
Schedules
Schedules run a set of Systems according to some execution strategy. Systems can be added to any number of System Sets, which are used to control their scheduling metadata.
The built in "parallel executor" considers dependencies between systems and (by default) run as many of them in parallel as possible. This maximizes performance, while keeping the system execution safe. To control the system ordering, define explicit dependencies between systems and their sets.
Using Bevy ECS
Bevy ECS should feel very natural for those familiar with Rust syntax:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
// This system moves each entity with a Position and Velocity component
fn movement(mut query: Query<(&mut Position, &Velocity)>) {
for (mut position, velocity) in &mut query {
position.x += velocity.x;
position.y += velocity.y;
}
}
fn main() {
// Create a new empty World to hold our Entities and Components
let mut world = World::new();
// Spawn an entity with Position and Velocity components
world.spawn((
Position { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 },
Velocity { x: 1.0, y: 0.0 },
));
// Create a new Schedule, which defines an execution strategy for Systems
let mut schedule = Schedule::default();
// Add our system to the schedule
schedule.add_systems(movement);
// Run the schedule once. If your app has a "loop", you would run this once per loop
schedule.run(&mut world);
}
Features
Query Filters
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Player;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Alive;
// Gets the Position component of all Entities with Player component and without the Alive
// component.
fn system(query: Query<&Position, (With<Player>, Without<Alive>)>) {
for position in &query {
}
}
Change Detection
Bevy ECS tracks all changes to Components and Resources.
Queries can filter for changed Components:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
// Gets the Position component of all Entities whose Velocity has changed since the last run of the System
fn system_changed(query: Query<&Position, Changed<Velocity>>) {
for position in &query {
}
}
// Gets the Position component of all Entities that had a Velocity component added since the last run of the System
fn system_added(query: Query<&Position, Added<Velocity>>) {
for position in &query {
}
}
Resources also expose change state:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Resource)]
struct Time(f32);
// Prints "time changed!" if the Time resource has changed since the last run of the System
fn system(time: Res<Time>) {
if time.is_changed() {
println!("time changed!");
}
}
Component Storage
Bevy ECS supports multiple component storage types.
Components can be stored in:
- Tables: Fast and cache friendly iteration, but slower adding and removing of components. This is the default storage type.
- Sparse Sets: Fast adding and removing of components, but slower iteration.
Component storage types are configurable, and they default to table storage if the storage is not manually defined.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct TableStoredComponent;
#[derive(Component)]
#[component(storage = "SparseSet")]
struct SparseStoredComponent;
Component Bundles
Define sets of Components that should be added together.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Player;
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Bundle, Default)]
struct PlayerBundle {
player: Player,
position: Position,
velocity: Velocity,
}
let mut world = World::new();
// Spawn a new entity and insert the default PlayerBundle
world.spawn(PlayerBundle::default());
// Bundles play well with Rust's struct update syntax
world.spawn(PlayerBundle {
position: Position { x: 1.0, y: 1.0 },
..Default::default()
});
Events
Events offer a communication channel between one or more systems. Events can be sent using the system parameter EventWriter
and received with EventReader
.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Event)]
struct MyEvent {
message: String,
}
fn writer(mut writer: EventWriter<MyEvent>) {
writer.send(MyEvent {
message: "hello!".to_string(),
});
}
fn reader(mut reader: EventReader<MyEvent>) {
for event in reader.read() {
}
}
Observers
Observers are systems that listen for a "trigger" of a specific Event
:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Event)]
struct MyEvent {
message: String
}
let mut world = World::new();
world.observe(|trigger: Trigger<MyEvent>| {
println!("{}", trigger.event().message);
});
world.flush();
world.trigger(MyEvent {
message: "hello!".to_string(),
});
These differ from EventReader
and EventWriter
in that they are "reactive". Rather than happening at a specific point in a schedule, they happen immediately whenever a trigger happens. Triggers can trigger other triggers, and they all will be evaluated at the same time!
Events can also be triggered to target specific entities:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Event)]
struct Explode;
let mut world = World::new();
let entity = world.spawn_empty().id();
world.observe(|trigger: Trigger<Explode>, mut commands: Commands| {
println!("Entity {:?} goes BOOM!", trigger.entity());
commands.entity(trigger.entity()).despawn();
});
world.flush();
world.trigger_targets(Explode, entity);