71b22397da
# Objective - Expand the documentation for `EasingCurve`. - I suspect this might have avoided the confusion in https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/17711. - Also add a shortcut for simple cases. ## Solution - Added various examples and extra context. - Implemented `Curve<T>` for `EaseFunction`. - This means `EasingCurve::new(0.0, 1.0, EaseFunction::X)` can be shortened to `EaseFunction::X`. - In some cases this will be a minor performance improvement. - Added test to confirm they're the same. - ~~Added some benchmarks for bonus points.~~ ## Side Notes - I would have liked to rename `EaseFunction` to `EaseFn` for brevity, but that would be a breaking change and maybe controversial. - Also suspect `EasingCurve` should be `EaseCurve`, but say la vee. - Benchmarks show that calling `EaseFunction::Smoothstep` is still slower than calling `smoothstep` directly. - I think this is because the compiler refuses to inline `EaseFunction::eval`. - I don't see any good solution - might need a whole different interface. ## Testing ```sh cargo test --package bevy_math cargo doc --package bevy_math ./target/doc/bevy_math/curve/easing/struct.EasingCurve.html cargo bench --package benches --bench math -- easing ``` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| images/easefunction | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| clippy.toml | ||
| LICENSE-APACHE | ||
| LICENSE-MIT | ||
| README.md | ||
Bevy Math
