# Objective
- Correct a mistake in the rustdoc for bevy_ecs::world::World.
## Solution
- The rustdoc wrongly stated that "Each component can have up to one
instance of each component type.". This sentence should presumably be
"Each *Entity* can have up to one instance of each component type.".
Applying this change makes the prior sentence "Each [`Entity`] has a set
of components." redundant.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
The various `Query::sort()` methods have a lot of duplicated code
between them, including some unsafe code. Reduce the duplication to make
the code easier to read and maintain.
## Solution
Extract the duplicated code to a private method, and pass in the sorting
strategy as a closure.
## Testing
I used `cargo-show-asm` to verify that the closures were inlined, but I
didn't run anything through a profiler. The `sort()` method itself even
had identical assembly before and after this change, although the others
did not.
# Objective
We do not have `EntityIndexMap`/`EntityIndexSet`.
Usual `HashMap`s/`HashSet`s do not guarantee any order, which can be
awkward for some use cases.
The `indexmap` versions remember insertion order, which then also
becomes their iteration order.
They can be thought of as a `HashTable` + `Vec`, which means fast
iteration and removal, indexing by index (not just key), and slicing!
Performance should otherwise be comparable.
## Solution
Because `indexmap` is structured to mirror `hashbrown`, it suffers the
same issue of not having the `Hasher` generic on their iterators. #16912
solved this issue for `EntityHashMap`/`EntityHashSet` with a wrapper
around the hashbrown version, so this PR does the same.
Hopefully these wrappers can be removed again in the future by having
`hashbrown`/`indexmap` adopt that generic in their iterators themselves!
# Objective
- Trouble remembering the difference between `OnAdd` and `OnInsert` for
triggers. Would like a better doc for those triggers so it appears in my
editor tooltip.
## Solution
- Clarify docs for OnAdd, OnInsert, OnRemove, OnReplace. Based on
comments in the
[component_hook.rs](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/main/examples/ecs/component_hooks.rs#L73)
example.
## Testing
- None, small doc fix.
# Objective
Some collections are more efficient to construct when we know that every
element is unique in advance.
We have `EntitySetIterator`s from #16547, but currently no API to safely
make use of them this way.
## Solution
Add `FromEntitySetIterator` as a subtrait to `FromIterator`, and
implement it for the `EntityHashSet`/`hashbrown::HashSet` types.
To match the normal `FromIterator`, we also add a
`EntitySetIterator::collect_set` method.
It'd be better if these methods could shadow `from_iter` and `collect`
completely, but https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89151 is needed
for that.
While currently only `HashSet`s implement this trait, future
`UniqueEntityVec`/`UniqueEntitySlice` functionality comes with more
implementors.
Because `HashMap`s are collected from tuples instead of singular types,
implementing this same optimization for them is more complex, and has to
be done separately.
## Showcase
This is basically a free speedup for collecting `EntityHashSet`s!
```rust
pub fn collect_milk_dippers(dippers: Query<Entity, (With<Milk>, With<Cookies>)>) {
dippers.iter().collect_set::<EntityHashSet>();
// or
EntityHashSet::from_entity_set_iter(dippers);
}
---------
Co-authored-by: SpecificProtagonist <vincentjunge@posteo.net>
# Objective
- Contributes to #16877
## Solution
- Moved `hashbrown`, `foldhash`, and related types out of `bevy_utils`
and into `bevy_platform_support`
- Refactored the above to match the layout of these types in `std`.
- Updated crates as required.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
- The following items were moved out of `bevy_utils` and into
`bevy_platform_support::hash`:
- `FixedState`
- `DefaultHasher`
- `RandomState`
- `FixedHasher`
- `Hashed`
- `PassHash`
- `PassHasher`
- `NoOpHash`
- The following items were moved out of `bevy_utils` and into
`bevy_platform_support::collections`:
- `HashMap`
- `HashSet`
- `bevy_utils::hashbrown` has been removed. Instead, import from
`bevy_platform_support::collections` _or_ take a dependency on
`hashbrown` directly.
- `bevy_utils::Entry` has been removed. Instead, import from
`bevy_platform_support::collections::hash_map` or
`bevy_platform_support::collections::hash_set` as appropriate.
- All of the above equally apply to `bevy::utils` and
`bevy::platform_support`.
## Notes
- I left `PreHashMap`, `PreHashMapExt`, and `TypeIdMap` in `bevy_utils`
as they might be candidates for micro-crating. They can always be moved
into `bevy_platform_support` at a later date if desired.
# Objective
- Contributes to #16877
## Solution
- Expanded `bevy_platform_support::sync` module to provide
API-compatible replacements for `std` items such as `RwLock`, `Mutex`,
and `OnceLock`.
- Removed `spin` from all crates except `bevy_platform_support`.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Notes
- The sync primitives, while verbose, entirely rely on `spin` for their
implementation requiring no `unsafe` and not changing the status-quo on
_how_ locks actually work within Bevy. This is just a refactoring to
consolidate the "hacks" and workarounds required to get a consistent
experience when either using `std::sync` or `spin`.
- I have opted to rely on `std::sync` for `std` compatible locks,
maintaining the status quo. However, now that we have these locks
factored out into the own module, it would be trivial to investigate
alternate locking backends, such as `parking_lot`.
- API for these locking types is entirely based on `std`. I have
implemented methods and types which aren't currently in use within Bevy
(e.g., `LazyLock` and `Once`) for the sake of completeness. As the
standard library is highly stable, I don't expect the Bevy and `std`
implementations to drift apart much if at all.
---------
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
# Objective
Fixes#17457
## Solution
#[derive(FromWorld)] now works with enums by specifying which variant
should be used.
## Showcase
```rust
#[Derive(FromWorld)]
enum Game {
#[from_world]
Playing,
Stopped
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
# Objective
- Make the function signature for `ComponentHook` less verbose
## Solution
- Refactored `Entity`, `ComponentId`, and `Option<&Location>` into a new
`HookContext` struct.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
Update the function signatures for your component hooks to only take 2
arguments, `world` and `context`. Note that because `HookContext` is
plain data with all members public, you can use de-structuring to
simplify migration.
```rust
// Before
fn my_hook(
mut world: DeferredWorld,
entity: Entity,
component_id: ComponentId,
) { ... }
// After
fn my_hook(
mut world: DeferredWorld,
HookContext { entity, component_id, caller }: HookContext,
) { ... }
```
Likewise, if you were discarding certain parameters, you can use `..` in
the de-structuring:
```rust
// Before
fn my_hook(
mut world: DeferredWorld,
entity: Entity,
_: ComponentId,
) { ... }
// After
fn my_hook(
mut world: DeferredWorld,
HookContext { entity, .. }: HookContext,
) { ... }
```
# Objective
Fixes#14708
Also fixes some commands not updating tracked location.
## Solution
`ObserverTrigger` has a new `caller` field with the
`track_change_detection` feature;
hooks take an additional caller parameter (which is `Some(…)` or `None`
depending on the feature).
## Testing
See the new tests in `src/observer/mod.rs`
---
## Showcase
Observers now know from where they were triggered (if
`track_change_detection` is enabled):
```rust
world.observe(move |trigger: Trigger<OnAdd, Foo>| {
println!("Added Foo from {}", trigger.caller());
});
```
## Migration
- hooks now take an additional `Option<&'static Location>` argument
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
## Objective
Most `try` methods on `World` return a `Result`, but `try_despawn` and
`try_insert_batch` don't. Since Bevy's error handling is advancing,
these should be brought in line.
## Solution
- Added `TryDespawnError` and `TryInsertBatchError`.
- `try_despawn`, `try_insert_batch`, and `try_insert_batch_if_new` now
return their respective errors.
- Fixed slightly incorrect behavior in `try_insert_batch_with_caller`.
- The method was always meant to continue with the rest of the batch if
an entity was missing, but that only worked after the first entity; if
the first entity was missing, the method would exit early. This has been
resolved.
## Migration Guide
- `World::try_despawn` now returns a `Result` rather than a `bool`.
- `World::try_insert_batch` and `World::try_insert_batch_if_new` now
return a `Result` where they previously returned nothing.
# Objective
`bevy_ecs`'s `system` module is something of a grab bag, and *very*
large. This is particularly true for the `system_param` module, which is
more than 2k lines long!
While it could be defensible to put `Res` and `ResMut` there (lol no
they're in change_detection.rs, obviously), it doesn't make any sense to
put the `Resource` trait there. This is confusing to navigate (and
painful to work on and review).
## Solution
- Create a root level `bevy_ecs/resource.rs` module to mirror
`bevy_ecs/component.rs`
- move the `Resource` trait to that module
- move the `Resource` derive macro to that module as well (Rust really
likes when you pun on the names of the derive macro and trait and put
them in the same path)
- fix all of the imports
## Notes to reviewers
- We could probably move more stuff into here, but I wanted to keep this
PR as small as possible given the absurd level of import changes.
- This PR is ground work for my upcoming attempts to store resource data
on components (resources-as-entities). Splitting this code out will make
the work and review a bit easier, and is the sort of overdue refactor
that's good to do as part of more meaningful work.
## Testing
cargo build works!
## Migration Guide
`bevy_ecs::system::Resource` has been moved to
`bevy_ecs::resource::Resource`.
# Objective
While being able to quickly add / remove components down a tree is
broadly useful (material changing!), it's particularly necessary when
combined with the newly added #13120.
## Solution
Write four methods: covering both adding and removal on both
`EntityWorldMut` and `EntityCommands`.
These methods are generic over the `RelationshipTarget`, thanks to the
freshly merged relations 🎉
## Testing
I've added a simple unit test for these methods.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au>
# Objective
After #17398, Bevy now has relations! We don't teach users how to make /
work with these in the examples yet though, but we definitely should.
## Solution
- Add a simple abstract example that goes over defining, spawning,
traversing and removing a custom relations.
- ~~Add `Relationship` and `RelationshipTarget` to the prelude: the
trait methods are really helpful here.~~
- this causes subtle ambiguities with method names and weird compiler
errors. Not doing it here!
- Clean up related documentation that I referenced when writing this
example.
## Testing
`cargo run --example relationships`
## Notes to reviewers
1. Yes, I know that the cycle detection code could be more efficient. I
decided to reduce the caching to avoid distracting from the broader
point of "here's how you traverse relationships".
2. Instead of using an `App`, I've decide to use
`World::run_system_once` + system functions defined inside of `main` to
do something closer to literate programming.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joona Aalto <jondolf.dev@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MinerSebas <66798382+MinerSebas@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kristoffer Søholm <k.soeholm@gmail.com>
Fixes#17412
## Objective
`Parent` uses the "has a X" naming convention. There is increasing
sentiment that we should use the "is a X" naming convention for
relationships (following #17398). This leaves `Children` as-is because
there is prevailing sentiment that `Children` is clearer than `ParentOf`
in many cases (especially when treating it like a collection).
This renames `Parent` to `ChildOf`.
This is just the implementation PR. To discuss the path forward, do so
in #17412.
## Migration Guide
- The `Parent` component has been renamed to `ChildOf`.
# Objective
Some usecases in the ecosystems are blocked by the inability to stop
bevy internals and third party plugins from touching their entities.
However the specifics of a general purpose entity disabling system are
controversial and further complicated by hierarchies. We can partially
unblock these usecases with an opt-in approach: default query filters.
## Solution
- Introduce DefaultQueryFilters, these filters are automatically applied
to queries that don't otherwise mention the filtered component.
- End users and third party plugins can register default filters and are
responsible for handling entities they have hidden this way.
- Extra features can be left for after user feedback
- The default value could later include official ways to hide entities
---
## Changelog
- Add DefaultQueryFilters
# Objective
Diagnostics for labels don't suggest how to best implement them.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Label: ScheduleLabel` is not satisfied
--> src/main.rs:15:35
|
15 | let mut sched = Schedule::new(Label);
| ------------- ^^^^^ the trait `ScheduleLabel` is not implemented for `Label`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= help: the trait `ScheduleLabel` is implemented for `Interned<(dyn ScheduleLabel + 'static)>`
note: required by a bound in `bevy_ecs::schedule::Schedule::new`
--> /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/schedule/schedule.rs:297:28
|
297 | pub fn new(label: impl ScheduleLabel) -> Self {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Schedule::new`
```
## Solution
`diagnostics::on_unimplemented` and `diagnostics::do_not_recommend`
## Showcase
New error message:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Label: ScheduleLabel` is not satisfied
--> src/main.rs:15:35
|
15 | let mut sched = Schedule::new(Label);
| ------------- ^^^^^ the trait `ScheduleLabel` is not implemented for `Label`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: consider annotating `Label` with `#[derive(ScheduleLabel)]`
note: required by a bound in `bevy_ecs::schedule::Schedule::new`
--> /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/schedule/schedule.rs:297:28
|
297 | pub fn new(label: impl ScheduleLabel) -> Self {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Schedule::new`
```
docs: enhance documentation in `query.rs` to clarify borrowing rules.
Please, let me know if you don't agree with the wording.. There is
always room for improvement.
Tested locally and it looks like this:
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Noticed while doing #17449, I had left these `DerefMut` impls in.
Obtaining mutable references to those inner iterator types allows for
`mem::swap`, which can be used to swap an incorrectly behaving instance
into the wrappers.
## Solution
Remove them!
# Objective
The existing `RelationshipSourceCollection` uses `Vec` as the only
possible backing for our relationships. While a reasonable choice,
benchmarking use cases might reveal that a different data type is better
or faster.
For example:
- Not all relationships require a stable ordering between the
relationship sources (i.e. children). In cases where we a) have many
such relations and b) don't care about the ordering between them, a hash
set is likely a better datastructure than a `Vec`.
- The number of children-like entities may be small on average, and a
`smallvec` may be faster
## Solution
- Implement `RelationshipSourceCollection` for `EntityHashSet`, our
custom entity-optimized `HashSet`.
-~~Implement `DoubleEndedIterator` for `EntityHashSet` to make things
compile.~~
- This implementation was cursed and very surprising.
- Instead, by moving the iterator type on `RelationshipSourceCollection`
from an erased RPTIT to an explicit associated type we can add a trait
bound on the offending methods!
- Implement `RelationshipSourceCollection` for `SmallVec`
## Testing
I've added a pair of new tests to make sure this pattern compiles
successfully in practice!
## Migration Guide
`EntityHashSet` and `EntityHashMap` are no longer re-exported in
`bevy_ecs::entity` directly. If you were not using `bevy_ecs` / `bevy`'s
`prelude`, you can access them through their now-public modules,
`hash_set` and `hash_map` instead.
## Notes to reviewers
The `EntityHashSet::Iter` type needs to be public for this impl to be
allowed. I initially renamed it to something that wasn't ambiguous and
re-exported it, but as @Victoronz pointed out, that was somewhat
unidiomatic.
In
1a8564898f,
I instead made the `entity_hash_set` public (and its `entity_hash_set`)
sister public, and removed the re-export. I prefer this design (give me
module docs please), but it leads to a lot of churn in this PR.
Let me know which you'd prefer, and if you'd like me to split that
change out into its own micro PR.
simple derive macro for `FromWorld`. Going to be needed for composable
pipeline specializers but probably a nice thing to have regardless
## Testing
simple manual testing, nothing seemed to blow up. I'm no proc macro pro
though, so there's a chance I've mishandled spans somewhere or
something.
# Objective
- Contributes to #16877
## Solution
- Initial creation of `bevy_platform_support` crate.
- Moved `bevy_utils::Instant` into new `bevy_platform_support` crate.
- Moved `portable-atomic`, `portable-atomic-util`, and
`critical-section` into new `bevy_platform_support` crate.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Showcase
Instead of needing code like this to import an `Arc`:
```rust
#[cfg(feature = "portable-atomic")]
use portable_atomic_util::Arc;
#[cfg(not(feature = "portable-atomic"))]
use alloc::sync::Arc;
```
We can now use:
```rust
use bevy_platform_support::sync::Arc;
```
This applies to many other types, but the goal is overall the same:
allowing crates to use `std`-like types without the boilerplate of
conditional compilation and platform-dependencies.
## Migration Guide
- Replace imports of `bevy_utils::Instant` with
`bevy_platform_support::time::Instant`
- Replace imports of `bevy::utils::Instant` with
`bevy::platform_support::time::Instant`
## Notes
- `bevy_platform_support` hasn't been reserved on `crates.io`
- ~~`bevy_platform_support` is not re-exported from `bevy` at this time.
It may be worthwhile exporting this crate, but I am unsure of a
reasonable name to export it under (`platform_support` may be a bit
wordy for user-facing).~~
- I've included an implementation of `Instant` which is suitable for
`no_std` platforms that are not Wasm for the sake of eliminating feature
gates around its use. It may be a controversial inclusion, so I'm happy
to remove it if required.
- There are many other items (`spin`, `bevy_utils::Sync(Unsafe)Cell`,
etc.) which should be added to this crate. I have kept the initial scope
small to demonstrate utility without making this too unwieldy.
---------
Co-authored-by: TimJentzsch <TimJentzsch@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
This adds support for one-to-many non-fragmenting relationships (with
planned paths for fragmenting and non-fragmenting many-to-many
relationships). "Non-fragmenting" means that entities with the same
relationship type, but different relationship targets, are not forced
into separate tables (which would cause "table fragmentation").
Functionally, this fills a similar niche as the current Parent/Children
system. The biggest differences are:
1. Relationships have simpler internals and significantly improved
performance and UX. Commands and specialized APIs are no longer
necessary to keep everything in sync. Just spawn entities with the
relationship components you want and everything "just works".
2. Relationships are generalized. Bevy can provide additional built in
relationships, and users can define their own.
**REQUEST TO REVIEWERS**: _please don't leave top level comments and
instead comment on specific lines of code. That way we can take
advantage of threaded discussions. Also dont leave comments simply
pointing out CI failures as I can read those just fine._
## Built on top of what we have
Relationships are implemented on top of the Bevy ECS features we already
have: components, immutability, and hooks. This makes them immediately
compatible with all of our existing (and future) APIs for querying,
spawning, removing, scenes, reflection, etc. The fewer specialized APIs
we need to build, maintain, and teach, the better.
## Why focus on one-to-many non-fragmenting first?
1. This allows us to improve Parent/Children relationships immediately,
in a way that is reasonably uncontroversial. Switching our hierarchy to
fragmenting relationships would have significant performance
implications. ~~Flecs is heavily considering a switch to non-fragmenting
relations after careful considerations of the performance tradeoffs.~~
_(Correction from @SanderMertens: Flecs is implementing non-fragmenting
storage specialized for asset hierarchies, where asset hierarchies are
many instances of small trees that have a well defined structure)_
2. Adding generalized one-to-many relationships is currently a priority
for the [Next Generation Scene / UI
effort](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437).
Specifically, we're interested in building reactions and observers on
top.
## The changes
This PR does the following:
1. Adds a generic one-to-many Relationship system
3. Ports the existing Parent/Children system to Relationships, which now
lives in `bevy_ecs::hierarchy`. The old `bevy_hierarchy` crate has been
removed.
4. Adds on_despawn component hooks
5. Relationships can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior, meaning
that the entire relationship hierarchy is despawned when
`entity.despawn()` is called. The built in Parent/Children hierarchies
enable this behavior, and `entity.despawn_recursive()` has been removed.
6. `world.spawn` now applies commands after spawning. This ensures that
relationship bookkeeping happens immediately and removes the need to
manually flush. This is in line with the equivalent behaviors recently
added to the other APIs (ex: insert).
7. Removes the ValidParentCheckPlugin (system-driven / poll based) in
favor of a `validate_parent_has_component` hook.
## Using Relationships
The `Relationship` trait looks like this:
```rust
pub trait Relationship: Component + Sized {
type RelationshipSources: RelationshipSources<Relationship = Self>;
fn get(&self) -> Entity;
fn from(entity: Entity) -> Self;
}
```
A relationship is a component that:
1. Is a simple wrapper over a "target" Entity.
2. Has a corresponding `RelationshipSources` component, which is a
simple wrapper over a collection of entities. Every "target entity"
targeted by a "source entity" with a `Relationship` has a
`RelationshipSources` component, which contains every "source entity"
that targets it.
For example, the `Parent` component (as it currently exists in Bevy) is
the `Relationship` component and the entity containing the Parent is the
"source entity". The entity _inside_ the `Parent(Entity)` component is
the "target entity". And that target entity has a `Children` component
(which implements `RelationshipSources`).
In practice, the Parent/Children relationship looks like this:
```rust
#[derive(Relationship)]
#[relationship(relationship_sources = Children)]
pub struct Parent(pub Entity);
#[derive(RelationshipSources)]
#[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent)]
pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>);
```
The Relationship and RelationshipSources derives automatically implement
Component with the relevant configuration (namely, the hooks necessary
to keep everything in sync).
The most direct way to add relationships is to spawn entities with
relationship components:
```rust
let a = world.spawn_empty().id();
let b = world.spawn(Parent(a)).id();
assert_eq!(world.entity(a).get::<Children>().unwrap(), &[b]);
```
There are also convenience APIs for spawning more than one entity with
the same relationship:
```rust
world.spawn_empty().with_related::<Children>(|s| {
s.spawn_empty();
s.spawn_empty();
})
```
The existing `with_children` API is now a simpler wrapper over
`with_related`. This makes this change largely non-breaking for existing
spawn patterns.
```rust
world.spawn_empty().with_children(|s| {
s.spawn_empty();
s.spawn_empty();
})
```
There are also other relationship APIs, such as `add_related` and
`despawn_related`.
## Automatic recursive despawn via the new on_despawn hook
`RelationshipSources` can opt-in to "despawn descendants" behavior,
which will despawn all related entities in the relationship hierarchy:
```rust
#[derive(RelationshipSources)]
#[relationship_sources(relationship = Parent, despawn_descendants)]
pub struct Children(Vec<Entity>);
```
This means that `entity.despawn_recursive()` is no longer required.
Instead, just use `entity.despawn()` and the relevant related entities
will also be despawned.
To despawn an entity _without_ despawning its parent/child descendants,
you should remove the `Children` component first, which will also remove
the related `Parent` components:
```rust
entity
.remove::<Children>()
.despawn()
```
This builds on the on_despawn hook introduced in this PR, which is fired
when an entity is despawned (before other hooks).
## Relationships are the source of truth
`Relationship` is the _single_ source of truth component.
`RelationshipSources` is merely a reflection of what all the
`Relationship` components say. By embracing this, we are able to
significantly improve the performance of the system as a whole. We can
rely on component lifecycles to protect us against duplicates, rather
than needing to scan at runtime to ensure entities don't already exist
(which results in quadratic runtime). A single source of truth gives us
constant-time inserts. This does mean that we cannot directly spawn
populated `Children` components (or directly add or remove entities from
those components). I personally think this is a worthwhile tradeoff,
both because it makes the performance much better _and_ because it means
theres exactly one way to do things (which is a philosophy we try to
employ for Bevy APIs).
As an aside: treating both sides of the relationship as "equivalent
source of truth relations" does enable building simple and flexible
many-to-many relationships. But this introduces an _inherent_ need to
scan (or hash) to protect against duplicates.
[`evergreen_relations`](https://github.com/EvergreenNest/evergreen_relations)
has a very nice implementation of the "symmetrical many-to-many"
approach. Unfortunately I think the performance issues inherent to that
approach make it a poor choice for Bevy's default relationship system.
## Followup Work
* Discuss renaming `Parent` to `ChildOf`. I refrained from doing that in
this PR to keep the diff reasonable, but I'm personally biased toward
this change (and using that naming pattern generally for relationships).
* [Improved spawning
ergonomics](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/16920)
* Consider adding relationship observers/triggers for "relationship
targets" whenever a source is added or removed. This would replace the
current "hierarchy events" system, which is unused upstream but may have
existing users downstream. I think triggers are the better fit for this
than a buffered event queue, and would prefer not to add that back.
* Fragmenting relations: My current idea hinges on the introduction of
"value components" (aka: components whose type _and_ value determines
their ComponentId, via something like Hashing / PartialEq). By labeling
a Relationship component such as `ChildOf(Entity)` as a "value
component", `ChildOf(e1)` and `ChildOf(e2)` would be considered
"different components". This makes the transition between fragmenting
and non-fragmenting a single flag, and everything else continues to work
as expected.
* Many-to-many support
* Non-fragmenting: We can expand Relationship to be a list of entities
instead of a single entity. I have largely already written the code for
this.
* Fragmenting: With the "value component" impl mentioned above, we get
many-to-many support "for free", as it would allow inserting multiple
copies of a Relationship component with different target entities.
Fixes#3742 (If this PR is merged, I think we should open more targeted
followup issues for the work above, with a fresh tracking issue free of
the large amount of less-directed historical context)
Fixes#17301Fixes#12235Fixes#15299Fixes#15308
## Migration Guide
* Replace `ChildBuilder` with `ChildSpawnerCommands`.
* Replace calls to `.set_parent(parent_id)` with
`.insert(Parent(parent_id))`.
* Replace calls to `.replace_children()` with `.remove::<Children>()`
followed by `.add_children()`. Note that you'll need to manually despawn
any children that are not carried over.
* Replace calls to `.despawn_recursive()` with `.despawn()`.
* Replace calls to `.despawn_descendants()` with
`.despawn_related::<Children>()`.
* If you have any calls to `.despawn()` which depend on the children
being preserved, you'll need to remove the `Children` component first.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Occasionally bevy users will want to store systems or observer systems
in a component or resource, but they first try to store `IntoSystem`
instead of `System`, which leads to some headaches having to deal with
the `M` marker type parameter. We should recommend they use the `X`
trait instead of the `IntoX` trait in that case, as well for returning
from a function.
## Solution
Add usage notes to the `IntoX` traits about using `X` instead.
# Objective
- Fix issue identified on the [Discord
server](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/691052431974465548/1328922812530036839)
## Solution
- Implement `Clone` for `QueryIter` using the existing
`QueryIter::remaining` method
## Testing
- CI
---
## Showcase
Users can now explicitly clone a read-only `QueryIter`:
```rust
fn combinations(query: Query<&ComponentA>) {
let mut iter = query.iter();
while let Some(a) = iter.next() {
// Can now clone rather than use remaining
for b in iter.clone() {
// Check every combination (a, b)
}
}
}
```
## Notes
This doesn't add any new functionality outside the context of generic
code (e.g., `T: Iterator<...> + Clone`), it's mostly for
discoverability. Users are more likely to be familiar with
`Clone::clone` than they are with the methods on `QueryIter`.
# Objective
As raised in https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/17317, the `Event:
Component` trait bound is confusing to users.
In general, a type `E` (like `AppExit`) which implements `Event` should
not:
- be stored as a component on an entity
- be a valid option for `Query<&AppExit>`
- require the storage type and other component metadata to be specified
Events are not components (even if they one day use some of the same
internal mechanisms), and this trait bound is confusing to users.
We're also automatically generating `Component` impls with our derive
macro, which should be avoided when possible to improve explicitness and
avoid conflicts with user impls.
Closes#17317, closes#17333
## Solution
- We only care that each unique event type gets a unique `ComponentId`
- dynamic events need their own tools for getting identifiers anyways
- This avoids complicating the internals of `ComponentId` generation.
- Clearly document why this cludge-y solution exists.
In the medium term, I think that either a) properly generalizing
`ComponentId` (and moving it into `bevy_reflect?) or b) using a
new-typed `Entity` as the key for events is more correct. This change is
stupid simple though, and removes the offending trait bound in a way
that doesn't introduce complex tech debt and does not risk changes to
the internals.
This change does not:
- restrict our ability to implement dynamic buffered events (the main
improvement over #17317)
- there's still a fair bit of work to do, but this is a step in the
right direction
- limit our ability to store event metadata on entities in the future
- make it harder for users to work with types that are both events and
components (just add the derive / trait bound)
## Migration Guide
The `Event` trait no longer requires the `Component` trait. If you were
relying on this behavior, change your trait bounds from `Event` to
`Event + Component`. If you also want your `Event` type to implement
`Component`, add a derive.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111
## Solution
Move `#![warn(clippy::allow_attributes,
clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason)]` to the workspace `Cargo.toml`
## Testing
Lots of CI testing, and local testing too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
# Objective
- Currently, the `ObservedBy`-component is only public within the
`bevy_ecs` crate. Sometimes it is desirable to refer to this component
in the "game-code". Two examples that come in mind:
- Clearing all components in an entity, but intending to keep the
existing observers: Making `ObservedBy` public allows us to use
`commands.entity(entity).retain::<ObservedBy>();`, which clears all
other components, but keeps `ObservedBy`, which prevents the Observers
from despawning.
- The opposite of the above, clearing all of entities' Observers:
`commands.entity(entity).remove::<ObservedBy>` will despawn all
associated Observers. Admittedly, a cleaner solution would be something
like `commands.entity(entity).clear_observers()`, but this is
sufficient.
## Solution
- Removed `(crate)` "rule" and added `ObservedBy` to the prelude-module
## Testing
- Linked `bevy_ecs` locally with another project to see if `ObservedBy`
could be referenced.
# Objective
resolves#17326.
## Solution
Simply added the suggested run condition.
## Testing
A self-explanatory run condition. Fully verified by the operation of
`QueryFilter` in a system.
# Objective
- https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111
## Solution
Set the `clippy::allow_attributes` and
`clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason` lints to `warn`, and bring
`bevy_ecs` in line with the new restrictions.
## Testing
This PR is a WIP; testing will happen after it's finished.
# Objective
- Use `Clone` on `SystemParam`, when applicable, in a generic context.
## Solution
- Add some derives
## Testing
- I ran `cargo test` once.
- I didn't even look at the output.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
- `Once` renamed to `Warn`.
- `param_warn_once()` renamed to `warn_param_missing()`.
- `never_param_warn()` renamed to `ignore_param_missing()`.
Also includes changes to the documentation of the above methods.
Fixes#17262.
## Migration Guide
- `ParamWarnPolicy::Once` has been renamed to `ParamWarnPolicy::Warn`.
- `ParamWarnPolicy::param_warn_once` has been renamed to
`ParamWarnPolicy::warn_param_missing`.
- `ParamWarnPolicy::never_param_warn` has been renamed to
`ParamWarnPolicy::ignore_param_missing`.
# Objective
With the `track_location` feature, the error message of trying to
acquire an entity that was despawned pointed to the wrong line if the
entity index has been reused.
## Showcase
```rust
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
fn main() {
let mut world = World::new();
let e = world.spawn_empty().id();
world.despawn(e);
world.flush();
let _ = world.spawn_empty();
world.entity(e);
}
```
Old message:
```
Entity 0v1 was despawned by src/main.rs:8:19
```
New message:
```
Entity 0v1 does not exist (its index has been reused)
```
# Objective
Stumbled upon a `from <-> form` transposition while reviewing a PR,
thought it was interesting, and went down a bit of a rabbit hole.
## Solution
Fix em
# Objective
Rework / build on #17043 to simplify the implementation. #17043 should
be merged first, and the diff from this PR will get much nicer after it
is merged (this PR is net negative LOC).
## Solution
1. Command and EntityCommand have been vastly simplified. No more marker
components. Just one function.
2. Command and EntityCommand are now generic on the return type. This
enables result-less commands to exist, and allows us to statically
distinguish between fallible and infallible commands, which allows us to
skip the "error handling overhead" for cases that don't need it.
3. There are now only two command queue variants: `queue` and
`queue_fallible`. `queue` accepts commands with no return type.
`queue_fallible` accepts commands that return a Result (specifically,
one that returns an error that can convert to
`bevy_ecs::result::Error`).
4. I've added the concept of the "default error handler", which is used
by `queue_fallible`. This is a simple direct call to the `panic()` error
handler by default. Users that want to override this can enable the
`configurable_error_handler` cargo feature, then initialize the
GLOBAL_ERROR_HANDLER value on startup. This is behind a flag because
there might be minor overhead with `OnceLock` and I'm guessing this will
be a niche feature. We can also do perf testing with OnceLock if someone
really wants it to be used unconditionally, but I don't personally feel
the need to do that.
5. I removed the "temporary error handler" on Commands (and all code
associated with it). It added more branching, made Commands bigger /
more expensive to initialize (note that we construct it at high
frequencies / treat it like a pointer type), made the code harder to
follow, and introduced a bunch of additional functions. We instead rely
on the new default error handler used in `queue_fallible` for most
things. In the event that a custom handler is required,
`handle_error_with` can be used.
6. EntityCommand now _only_ supports functions that take
`EntityWorldMut` (and all existing entity commands have been ported).
Removing the marker component from EntityCommand hinged on this change,
but I strongly believe this is for the best anyway, as this sets the
stage for more efficient batched entity commands.
7. I added `EntityWorldMut::resource` and the other variants for more
ergonomic resource access on `EntityWorldMut` (removes the need for
entity.world_scope, which also incurs entity-lookup overhead).
## Open Questions
1. I believe we could merge `queue` and `queue_fallible` into a single
`queue` which accepts both fallible and infallible commands (via the
introduction of a `QueueCommand` trait). Is this desirable?
# Objective
- Shrink `bevy_utils` more.
- Refs #11478
## Solution
- Removes `assert_object_safe` from `bevy_utils` by using a compile time
check instead.
## Testing
- CI.
---
## Migration Guide
`assert_object_safe` is no longer exported by `bevy_utils`. Instead, you
can write a compile time check that your trait is "dyn compatible":
```rust
/// Assert MyTrait is dyn compatible
const _: Option<Box<dyn MyTrait>> = None;
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Many instances of `clippy::too_many_arguments` linting happen to be on
systems - functions which we don't call manually, and thus there's not
much reason to worry about the argument count.
## Solution
Allow `clippy::too_many_arguments` globally, and remove all lint
attributes related to it.
## Objective
Fixes#2004Fixes#3845Fixes#7118Fixes#10166
## Solution
- The crux of this PR is the new `Command::with_error_handling` method.
This wraps the relevant command in another command that, when applied,
will apply the original command and handle any resulting errors.
- To enable this, `Command::apply` and `EntityCommand::apply` now return
`Result`.
- `Command::with_error_handling` takes as a parameter an error handler
of the form `fn(&mut World, CommandError)`, which it passes the error
to.
- `CommandError` is an enum that can be either `NoSuchEntity(Entity)` or
`CommandFailed(Box<dyn Error>)`.
### Closures
- Closure commands can now optionally return `Result`, which will be
passed to `with_error_handling`.
### Commands
- Fallible commands can be queued with `Commands::queue_fallible` and
`Commands::queue_fallible_with`, which call `with_error_handling` before
queuing them (using `Commands::queue` will queue them without error
handling).
- `Commands::queue_fallible_with` takes an `error_handler` parameter,
which will be used by `with_error_handling` instead of a command's
default.
- The `command` submodule provides unqueued forms of built-in fallible
commands so that you can use them with `queue_fallible_with`.
- There is also an `error_handler` submodule that provides simple error
handlers for convenience.
### Entity Commands
- `EntityCommand` now automatically checks if the entity exists before
executing the command, and returns `NoSuchEntity` if it doesn't.
- Since all entity commands might need to return an error, they are
always queued with error handling.
- `EntityCommands::queue_with` takes an `error_handler` parameter, which
will be used by `with_error_handling` instead of a command's default.
- The `entity_command` submodule provides unqueued forms of built-in
entity commands so that you can use them with `queue_with`.
### Defaults
- In the future, commands should all fail according to the global error
handling setting. That doesn't exist yet though.
- For this PR, commands all fail the way they do on `main`.
- Both now and in the future, the defaults can be overridden by
`Commands::override_error_handler` (or equivalent methods on
`EntityCommands` and `EntityEntryCommands`).
- `override_error_handler` takes an error handler (`fn(&mut World,
CommandError)`) and passes it to every subsequent command queued with
`Commands::queue_fallible` or `EntityCommands::queue`.
- The `_with` variants of the queue methods will still provide an error
handler directly to the command.
- An override can be reset with `reset_error_handler`.
## Future Work
- After a universal error handling mode is added, we can change all
commands to fail that way by default.
- Once we have all commands failing the same way (which would require
either the full removal of `try` variants or just making them useless
while they're deprecated), `queue_fallible_with_default` could be
removed, since its only purpose is to enable commands having different
defaults.
# Objective
Cleanup `EntityRef`, `EntityMut`, and `EntityWorldMut` in preparation
for my "Scoped Entity References" PR.
## Solution
- Switched `EntityRef`/`EntityMut` from tuple structs to normal ones.
- Ensured all conversion trait impls use the same `entity` argument
name.
- Replaced some `unsafe` with delegated calls from `EntityMut` to
`EntityRef`
- Added `EntityMut::into_readonly` to make the replacements clearer
- Replaced some `unsafe` with delegated calls from `EntityWorldMut` to
`EntityMut` and `EntityRef`
- Added `EntityWorldMut::into_readonly`, `::as_readonly`,
`::into_mutable`, `::as_mutable` to make the replacements clearer
## Testing
Reusing current tests.
Related to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/16843
Since `WorldQuery::Fetch` is `Clone`, it can't store mutable references
to resources, so it doesn't make sense to mutably access resources. In
that sense, it is hard to find usecases of mutably accessing resources
and to clearly define, what mutably accessing resources would mean, so
it's been decided to disallow write resource access.
Also changed documentation of safety requirements of
`WorldQuery::init_fetch` and `WorldQuery::fetch` to clearly state to the
caller, what safety invariants they need to uphold.
Bump version after release
This PR has been auto-generated
---------
Co-authored-by: Bevy Auto Releaser <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Contributes to #11478
## Solution
- Made `bevy_utils::tracing` `doc(hidden)`
- Re-exported `tracing` from `bevy_log` for end-users
- Added `tracing` directly to crates that need it.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
If you were importing `tracing` via `bevy::utils::tracing`, instead use
`bevy::log::tracing`. Note that many items within `tracing` are also
directly re-exported from `bevy::log` as well, so you may only need
`bevy::log` for the most common items (e.g., `warn!`, `trace!`, etc.).
This also applies to the `log_once!` family of macros.
## Notes
- While this doesn't reduce the line-count in `bevy_utils`, it further
decouples the internal crates from `bevy_utils`, making its eventual
removal more feasible in the future.
- I have just imported `tracing` as we do for all dependencies. However,
a workspace dependency may be more appropriate for version management.
## Objective
The error `EntityFetchError::NoSuchEntity` has an `UnsafeWorldCell`
inside it, which it uses to call
`Entities::entity_does_not_exist_error_details_message` when being
printed. That method returns a `String` that, if the `track_location`
feature is enabled, contains the location of whoever despawned the
relevant entity.
I initially had to modify this error while working on #17043. The
`UnsafeWorldCell` was causing borrow problems when being returned from a
command, so I tried replacing it with the `String` that the method
returns, since that was the world cell's only purpose.
Unfortunately, `String`s are slow, and it significantly impacted
performance (on top of that PR's performance hit):
<details>
<summary>17043 benchmarks</summary>
### With `String`
### No `String`
</details>
For that PR, I just removed the error details entirely, but I figured
I'd try to find a way to keep them around.
## Solution
- Replace the `String` with a helper struct that holds the location, and
only turn it into a string when someone actually wants to print it.
- Replace the `UnsafeWorldCell` with the aforementioned struct.
- Do the same for `QueryEntityError::NoSuchEntity`.
## Benchmarking
This had some interesting performance impact:
<details>
<summary>This PR vs main</summary>
</details>
## Other work
`QueryEntityError::QueryDoesNotMatch` also has an `UnsafeWorldCell`
inside it. This one would be more complicated to rework while keeping
the same functionality.
## Migration Guide
The errors `EntityFetchError::NoSuchEntity` and
`QueryEntityError::NoSuchEntity` now contain an
`EntityDoesNotExistDetails` struct instead of an `UnsafeWorldCell`. If
you were just printing these, they should work identically.
---------
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
