![]() # Objective Fixes a part of #14274. Bevy has an incredibly inconsistent naming convention for its system sets, both internally and across the ecosystem. <img alt="System sets in Bevy" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d16e2027-793f-4ba4-9cc9-e780b14a5a1b" width="450" /> *Names of public system set types in Bevy* Most Bevy types use a naming of `FooSystem` or just `Foo`, but there are also a few `FooSystems` and `FooSet` types. In ecosystem crates on the other hand, `FooSet` is perhaps the most commonly used name in general. Conventions being so wildly inconsistent can make it harder for users to pick names for their own types, to search for system sets on docs.rs, or to even discern which types *are* system sets. To reign in the inconsistency a bit and help unify the ecosystem, it would be good to establish a common recommended naming convention for system sets in Bevy itself, similar to how plugins are commonly suffixed with `Plugin` (ex: `TimePlugin`). By adopting a consistent naming convention in first-party Bevy, we can softly nudge ecosystem crates to follow suit (for types where it makes sense to do so). Choosing a naming convention is also relevant now, as the [`bevy_cli` recently adopted lints](https://github.com/TheBevyFlock/bevy_cli/pull/345) to enforce naming for plugins and system sets, and the recommended naming used for system sets is still a bit open. ## Which Name To Use? Now the contentious part: what naming convention should we actually adopt? This was discussed on the Bevy Discord at the end of last year, starting [here](<https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1310659954683936789>). `FooSet` and `FooSystems` were the clear favorites, with `FooSet` very narrowly winning an unofficial poll. However, it seems to me like the consensus was broadly moving towards `FooSystems` at the end and after the poll, with Cart ([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311140204974706708)) and later Alice ([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311092530732859533)) and also me being in favor of it. Let's do a quick pros and cons list! Of course these are just what I thought of, so take it with a grain of salt. `FooSet`: - Pro: Nice and short! - Pro: Used by many ecosystem crates. - Pro: The `Set` suffix comes directly from the trait name `SystemSet`. - Pro: Pairs nicely with existing APIs like `in_set` and `configure_sets`. - Con: `Set` by itself doesn't actually indicate that it's related to systems *at all*, apart from the implemented trait. A set of what? - Con: Is `FooSet` a set of `Foo`s or a system set related to `Foo`? Ex: `ContactSet`, `MeshSet`, `EnemySet`... `FooSystems`: - Pro: Very clearly indicates that the type represents a collection of systems. The actual core concept, system(s), is in the name. - Pro: Parallels nicely with `FooPlugins` for plugin groups. - Pro: Low risk of conflicts with other names or misunderstandings about what the type is. - Pro: In most cases, reads *very* nicely and clearly. Ex: `PhysicsSystems` and `AnimationSystems` as opposed to `PhysicsSet` and `AnimationSet`. - Pro: Easy to search for on docs.rs. - Con: Usually results in longer names. - Con: Not yet as widely used. Really the big problem with `FooSet` is that it doesn't actually describe what it is. It describes what *kind of thing* it is (a set of something), but not *what it is a set of*, unless you know the type or check its docs or implemented traits. `FooSystems` on the other hand is much more self-descriptive in this regard, at the cost of being a bit longer to type. Ultimately, in some ways it comes down to preference and how you think of system sets. Personally, I was originally in favor of `FooSet`, but have been increasingly on the side of `FooSystems`, especially after seeing what the new names would actually look like in Avian and now Bevy. I prefer it because it usually reads better, is much more clearly related to groups of systems than `FooSet`, and overall *feels* more correct and natural to me in the long term. For these reasons, and because Alice and Cart also seemed to share a preference for it when it was previously being discussed, I propose that we adopt a `FooSystems` naming convention where applicable. ## Solution Rename Bevy's system set types to use a consistent `FooSet` naming where applicable. - `AccessibilitySystem` → `AccessibilitySystems` - `GizmoRenderSystem` → `GizmoRenderSystems` - `PickSet` → `PickingSystems` - `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` → `RunFixedMainLoopSystems` - `TransformSystem` → `TransformSystems` - `RemoteSet` → `RemoteSystems` - `RenderSet` → `RenderSystems` - `SpriteSystem` → `SpriteSystems` - `StateTransitionSteps` → `StateTransitionSystems` - `RenderUiSystem` → `RenderUiSystems` - `UiSystem` → `UiSystems` - `Animation` → `AnimationSystems` - `AssetEvents` → `AssetEventSystems` - `TrackAssets` → `AssetTrackingSystems` - `UpdateGizmoMeshes` → `GizmoMeshSystems` - `InputSystem` → `InputSystems` - `InputFocusSet` → `InputFocusSystems` - `ExtractMaterialsSet` → `MaterialExtractionSystems` - `ExtractMeshesSet` → `MeshExtractionSystems` - `RumbleSystem` → `RumbleSystems` - `CameraUpdateSystem` → `CameraUpdateSystems` - `ExtractAssetsSet` → `AssetExtractionSystems` - `Update2dText` → `Text2dUpdateSystems` - `TimeSystem` → `TimeSystems` - `AudioPlaySet` → `AudioPlaybackSystems` - `SendEvents` → `EventSenderSystems` - `EventUpdates` → `EventUpdateSystems` A lot of the names got slightly longer, but they are also a lot more consistent, and in my opinion the majority of them read much better. For a few of the names I took the liberty of rewording things a bit; definitely open to any further naming improvements. There are still also cases where the `FooSystems` naming doesn't really make sense, and those I left alone. This primarily includes system sets like `Interned<dyn SystemSet>`, `EnterSchedules<S>`, `ExitSchedules<S>`, or `TransitionSchedules<S>`, where the type has some special purpose and semantics. ## Todo - [x] Should I keep all the old names as deprecated type aliases? I can do this, but to avoid wasting work I'd prefer to first reach consensus on whether these renames are even desired. - [x] Migration guide - [x] Release notes |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
compile_fail | ||
examples | ||
macros | ||
src | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
clippy.toml | ||
LICENSE-APACHE | ||
LICENSE-MIT | ||
README.md |
Bevy ECS
What is Bevy ECS?
Bevy ECS is an Entity Component System custom-built for the Bevy game engine. It aims to be simple to use, ergonomic, fast, massively parallel, opinionated, and featureful. It was created specifically for Bevy's needs, but it can easily be used as a standalone crate in other projects.
ECS
All app logic in Bevy uses the Entity Component System paradigm, which is often shortened to ECS. ECS is a software pattern that involves breaking your program up into Entities, Components, and Systems. Entities are unique "things" that are assigned groups of Components, which are then processed using Systems.
For example, one entity might have a Position
and Velocity
component, whereas another entity might have a Position
and UI
component. You might have a movement system that runs on all entities with a Position and Velocity component.
The ECS pattern encourages clean, decoupled designs by forcing you to break up your app data and logic into its core components. It also helps make your code faster by optimizing memory access patterns and making parallelism easier.
Concepts
Bevy ECS is Bevy's implementation of the ECS pattern. Unlike other Rust ECS implementations, which often require complex lifetimes, traits, builder patterns, or macros, Bevy ECS uses normal Rust data types for all of these concepts:
Components
Components are normal Rust structs. They are data stored in a World
and specific instances of Components correlate to Entities.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
Worlds
Entities, Components, and Resources are stored in a World
. Worlds, much like std::collections
's HashSet
and Vec
, expose operations to insert, read, write, and remove the data they store.
use bevy_ecs::world::World;
let world = World::default();
Entities
Entities are unique identifiers that correlate to zero or more Components.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
let mut world = World::new();
let entity = world
.spawn((Position { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 }, Velocity { x: 1.0, y: 0.0 }))
.id();
let entity_ref = world.entity(entity);
let position = entity_ref.get::<Position>().unwrap();
let velocity = entity_ref.get::<Velocity>().unwrap();
Systems
Systems are normal Rust functions. Thanks to the Rust type system, Bevy ECS can use function parameter types to determine what data needs to be sent to the system. It also uses this "data access" information to determine what Systems can run in parallel with each other.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
fn print_position(query: Query<(Entity, &Position)>) {
for (entity, position) in &query {
println!("Entity {} is at position: x {}, y {}", entity, position.x, position.y);
}
}
Resources
Apps often require unique resources, such as asset collections, renderers, audio servers, time, etc. Bevy ECS makes this pattern a first class citizen. Resource
is a special kind of component that does not belong to any entity. Instead, it is identified uniquely by its type:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Resource, Default)]
struct Time {
seconds: f32,
}
let mut world = World::new();
world.insert_resource(Time::default());
let time = world.get_resource::<Time>().unwrap();
// You can also access resources from Systems
fn print_time(time: Res<Time>) {
println!("{}", time.seconds);
}
Schedules
Schedules run a set of Systems according to some execution strategy. Systems can be added to any number of System Sets, which are used to control their scheduling metadata.
The built in "parallel executor" considers dependencies between systems and (by default) run as many of them in parallel as possible. This maximizes performance, while keeping the system execution safe. To control the system ordering, define explicit dependencies between systems and their sets.
Using Bevy ECS
Bevy ECS should feel very natural for those familiar with Rust syntax:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
// This system moves each entity with a Position and Velocity component
fn movement(mut query: Query<(&mut Position, &Velocity)>) {
for (mut position, velocity) in &mut query {
position.x += velocity.x;
position.y += velocity.y;
}
}
fn main() {
// Create a new empty World to hold our Entities and Components
let mut world = World::new();
// Spawn an entity with Position and Velocity components
world.spawn((
Position { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 },
Velocity { x: 1.0, y: 0.0 },
));
// Create a new Schedule, which defines an execution strategy for Systems
let mut schedule = Schedule::default();
// Add our system to the schedule
schedule.add_systems(movement);
// Run the schedule once. If your app has a "loop", you would run this once per loop
schedule.run(&mut world);
}
Features
Query Filters
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Player;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Alive;
// Gets the Position component of all Entities with Player component and without the Alive
// component.
fn system(query: Query<&Position, (With<Player>, Without<Alive>)>) {
for position in &query {
}
}
Change Detection
Bevy ECS tracks all changes to Components and Resources.
Queries can filter for changed Components:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
// Gets the Position component of all Entities whose Velocity has changed since the last run of the System
fn system_changed(query: Query<&Position, Changed<Velocity>>) {
for position in &query {
}
}
// Gets the Position component of all Entities that had a Velocity component added since the last run of the System
fn system_added(query: Query<&Position, Added<Velocity>>) {
for position in &query {
}
}
Resources also expose change state:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Resource)]
struct Time(f32);
// Prints "time changed!" if the Time resource has changed since the last run of the System
fn system(time: Res<Time>) {
if time.is_changed() {
println!("time changed!");
}
}
Component Storage
Bevy ECS supports multiple component storage types.
Components can be stored in:
- Tables: Fast and cache friendly iteration, but slower adding and removing of components. This is the default storage type.
- Sparse Sets: Fast adding and removing of components, but slower iteration.
Component storage types are configurable, and they default to table storage if the storage is not manually defined.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct TableStoredComponent;
#[derive(Component)]
#[component(storage = "SparseSet")]
struct SparseStoredComponent;
Component Bundles
Define sets of Components that should be added together.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Player;
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Bundle, Default)]
struct PlayerBundle {
player: Player,
position: Position,
velocity: Velocity,
}
let mut world = World::new();
// Spawn a new entity and insert the default PlayerBundle
world.spawn(PlayerBundle::default());
// Bundles play well with Rust's struct update syntax
world.spawn(PlayerBundle {
position: Position { x: 1.0, y: 1.0 },
..Default::default()
});
Events
Events offer a communication channel between one or more systems. Events can be sent using the system parameter EventWriter
and received with EventReader
.
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Event)]
struct MyEvent {
message: String,
}
fn writer(mut writer: EventWriter<MyEvent>) {
writer.send(MyEvent {
message: "hello!".to_string(),
});
}
fn reader(mut reader: EventReader<MyEvent>) {
for event in reader.read() {
}
}
Observers
Observers are systems that listen for a "trigger" of a specific Event
:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Event)]
struct MyEvent {
message: String
}
let mut world = World::new();
world.add_observer(|trigger: Trigger<MyEvent>| {
println!("{}", trigger.event().message);
});
world.flush();
world.trigger(MyEvent {
message: "hello!".to_string(),
});
These differ from EventReader
and EventWriter
in that they are "reactive". Rather than happening at a specific point in a schedule, they happen immediately whenever a trigger happens. Triggers can trigger other triggers, and they all will be evaluated at the same time!
Events can also be triggered to target specific entities:
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Event)]
struct Explode;
let mut world = World::new();
let entity = world.spawn_empty().id();
world.add_observer(|trigger: Trigger<Explode>, mut commands: Commands| {
println!("Entity {} goes BOOM!", trigger.target());
commands.entity(trigger.target()).despawn();
});
world.flush();
world.trigger_targets(Explode, entity);