bevy/crates/bevy_ecs
Joona Aalto 7b1c9f192e
Adopt consistent FooSystems naming convention for system sets (#18900)
# Objective

Fixes a part of #14274.

Bevy has an incredibly inconsistent naming convention for its system
sets, both internally and across the ecosystem.

<img alt="System sets in Bevy"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d16e2027-793f-4ba4-9cc9-e780b14a5a1b"
width="450" />

*Names of public system set types in Bevy*

Most Bevy types use a naming of `FooSystem` or just `Foo`, but there are
also a few `FooSystems` and `FooSet` types. In ecosystem crates on the
other hand, `FooSet` is perhaps the most commonly used name in general.
Conventions being so wildly inconsistent can make it harder for users to
pick names for their own types, to search for system sets on docs.rs, or
to even discern which types *are* system sets.

To reign in the inconsistency a bit and help unify the ecosystem, it
would be good to establish a common recommended naming convention for
system sets in Bevy itself, similar to how plugins are commonly suffixed
with `Plugin` (ex: `TimePlugin`). By adopting a consistent naming
convention in first-party Bevy, we can softly nudge ecosystem crates to
follow suit (for types where it makes sense to do so).

Choosing a naming convention is also relevant now, as the [`bevy_cli`
recently adopted
lints](https://github.com/TheBevyFlock/bevy_cli/pull/345) to enforce
naming for plugins and system sets, and the recommended naming used for
system sets is still a bit open.

## Which Name To Use?

Now the contentious part: what naming convention should we actually
adopt?

This was discussed on the Bevy Discord at the end of last year, starting
[here](<https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1310659954683936789>).
`FooSet` and `FooSystems` were the clear favorites, with `FooSet` very
narrowly winning an unofficial poll. However, it seems to me like the
consensus was broadly moving towards `FooSystems` at the end and after
the poll, with Cart
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311140204974706708))
and later Alice
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311092530732859533))
and also me being in favor of it.

Let's do a quick pros and cons list! Of course these are just what I
thought of, so take it with a grain of salt.

`FooSet`:

- Pro: Nice and short!
- Pro: Used by many ecosystem crates.
- Pro: The `Set` suffix comes directly from the trait name `SystemSet`.
- Pro: Pairs nicely with existing APIs like `in_set` and
`configure_sets`.
- Con: `Set` by itself doesn't actually indicate that it's related to
systems *at all*, apart from the implemented trait. A set of what?
- Con: Is `FooSet` a set of `Foo`s or a system set related to `Foo`? Ex:
`ContactSet`, `MeshSet`, `EnemySet`...

`FooSystems`:

- Pro: Very clearly indicates that the type represents a collection of
systems. The actual core concept, system(s), is in the name.
- Pro: Parallels nicely with `FooPlugins` for plugin groups.
- Pro: Low risk of conflicts with other names or misunderstandings about
what the type is.
- Pro: In most cases, reads *very* nicely and clearly. Ex:
`PhysicsSystems` and `AnimationSystems` as opposed to `PhysicsSet` and
`AnimationSet`.
- Pro: Easy to search for on docs.rs.
- Con: Usually results in longer names.
- Con: Not yet as widely used.

Really the big problem with `FooSet` is that it doesn't actually
describe what it is. It describes what *kind of thing* it is (a set of
something), but not *what it is a set of*, unless you know the type or
check its docs or implemented traits. `FooSystems` on the other hand is
much more self-descriptive in this regard, at the cost of being a bit
longer to type.

Ultimately, in some ways it comes down to preference and how you think
of system sets. Personally, I was originally in favor of `FooSet`, but
have been increasingly on the side of `FooSystems`, especially after
seeing what the new names would actually look like in Avian and now
Bevy. I prefer it because it usually reads better, is much more clearly
related to groups of systems than `FooSet`, and overall *feels* more
correct and natural to me in the long term.

For these reasons, and because Alice and Cart also seemed to share a
preference for it when it was previously being discussed, I propose that
we adopt a `FooSystems` naming convention where applicable.

## Solution

Rename Bevy's system set types to use a consistent `FooSet` naming where
applicable.

- `AccessibilitySystem` → `AccessibilitySystems`
- `GizmoRenderSystem` → `GizmoRenderSystems`
- `PickSet` → `PickingSystems`
- `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` → `RunFixedMainLoopSystems`
- `TransformSystem` → `TransformSystems`
- `RemoteSet` → `RemoteSystems`
- `RenderSet` → `RenderSystems`
- `SpriteSystem` → `SpriteSystems`
- `StateTransitionSteps` → `StateTransitionSystems`
- `RenderUiSystem` → `RenderUiSystems`
- `UiSystem` → `UiSystems`
- `Animation` → `AnimationSystems`
- `AssetEvents` → `AssetEventSystems`
- `TrackAssets` → `AssetTrackingSystems`
- `UpdateGizmoMeshes` → `GizmoMeshSystems`
- `InputSystem` → `InputSystems`
- `InputFocusSet` → `InputFocusSystems`
- `ExtractMaterialsSet` → `MaterialExtractionSystems`
- `ExtractMeshesSet` → `MeshExtractionSystems`
- `RumbleSystem` → `RumbleSystems`
- `CameraUpdateSystem` → `CameraUpdateSystems`
- `ExtractAssetsSet` → `AssetExtractionSystems`
- `Update2dText` → `Text2dUpdateSystems`
- `TimeSystem` → `TimeSystems`
- `AudioPlaySet` → `AudioPlaybackSystems`
- `SendEvents` → `EventSenderSystems`
- `EventUpdates` → `EventUpdateSystems`

A lot of the names got slightly longer, but they are also a lot more
consistent, and in my opinion the majority of them read much better. For
a few of the names I took the liberty of rewording things a bit;
definitely open to any further naming improvements.

There are still also cases where the `FooSystems` naming doesn't really
make sense, and those I left alone. This primarily includes system sets
like `Interned<dyn SystemSet>`, `EnterSchedules<S>`, `ExitSchedules<S>`,
or `TransitionSchedules<S>`, where the type has some special purpose and
semantics.

## Todo

- [x] Should I keep all the old names as deprecated type aliases? I can
do this, but to avoid wasting work I'd prefer to first reach consensus
on whether these renames are even desired.
- [x] Migration guide
- [x] Release notes
2025-05-06 15:18:03 +00:00
..
compile_fail Fix unsound lifetimes in Query::join and Query::join_filtered (#17972) 2025-03-10 21:30:34 +00:00
examples Adopt consistent FooSystems naming convention for system sets (#18900) 2025-05-06 15:18:03 +00:00
macros Derive clone_behavior for Components (#18811) 2025-05-06 00:32:59 +00:00
src Adopt consistent FooSystems naming convention for system sets (#18900) 2025-05-06 15:18:03 +00:00
Cargo.toml Rename bevy_platform_support to bevy_platform (#18813) 2025-04-11 23:13:28 +00:00
clippy.toml implement UniqueEntityVec (#17549) 2025-01-28 06:00:59 +00:00
LICENSE-APACHE Cleanup publish process (#17728) 2025-02-09 17:46:19 +00:00
LICENSE-MIT Cleanup publish process (#17728) 2025-02-09 17:46:19 +00:00
README.md

Bevy ECS

License Crates.io Downloads Docs Discord

What is Bevy ECS?

Bevy ECS is an Entity Component System custom-built for the Bevy game engine. It aims to be simple to use, ergonomic, fast, massively parallel, opinionated, and featureful. It was created specifically for Bevy's needs, but it can easily be used as a standalone crate in other projects.

ECS

All app logic in Bevy uses the Entity Component System paradigm, which is often shortened to ECS. ECS is a software pattern that involves breaking your program up into Entities, Components, and Systems. Entities are unique "things" that are assigned groups of Components, which are then processed using Systems.

For example, one entity might have a Position and Velocity component, whereas another entity might have a Position and UI component. You might have a movement system that runs on all entities with a Position and Velocity component.

The ECS pattern encourages clean, decoupled designs by forcing you to break up your app data and logic into its core components. It also helps make your code faster by optimizing memory access patterns and making parallelism easier.

Concepts

Bevy ECS is Bevy's implementation of the ECS pattern. Unlike other Rust ECS implementations, which often require complex lifetimes, traits, builder patterns, or macros, Bevy ECS uses normal Rust data types for all of these concepts:

Components

Components are normal Rust structs. They are data stored in a World and specific instances of Components correlate to Entities.

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }

Worlds

Entities, Components, and Resources are stored in a World. Worlds, much like std::collections's HashSet and Vec, expose operations to insert, read, write, and remove the data they store.

use bevy_ecs::world::World;

let world = World::default();

Entities

Entities are unique identifiers that correlate to zero or more Components.

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }

let mut world = World::new();

let entity = world
    .spawn((Position { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 }, Velocity { x: 1.0, y: 0.0 }))
    .id();

let entity_ref = world.entity(entity);
let position = entity_ref.get::<Position>().unwrap();
let velocity = entity_ref.get::<Velocity>().unwrap();

Systems

Systems are normal Rust functions. Thanks to the Rust type system, Bevy ECS can use function parameter types to determine what data needs to be sent to the system. It also uses this "data access" information to determine what Systems can run in parallel with each other.

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }

fn print_position(query: Query<(Entity, &Position)>) {
    for (entity, position) in &query {
        println!("Entity {} is at position: x {}, y {}", entity, position.x, position.y);
    }
}

Resources

Apps often require unique resources, such as asset collections, renderers, audio servers, time, etc. Bevy ECS makes this pattern a first class citizen. Resource is a special kind of component that does not belong to any entity. Instead, it is identified uniquely by its type:

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Resource, Default)]
struct Time {
    seconds: f32,
}

let mut world = World::new();

world.insert_resource(Time::default());

let time = world.get_resource::<Time>().unwrap();

// You can also access resources from Systems
fn print_time(time: Res<Time>) {
    println!("{}", time.seconds);
}

Schedules

Schedules run a set of Systems according to some execution strategy. Systems can be added to any number of System Sets, which are used to control their scheduling metadata.

The built in "parallel executor" considers dependencies between systems and (by default) run as many of them in parallel as possible. This maximizes performance, while keeping the system execution safe. To control the system ordering, define explicit dependencies between systems and their sets.

Using Bevy ECS

Bevy ECS should feel very natural for those familiar with Rust syntax:

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }

// This system moves each entity with a Position and Velocity component
fn movement(mut query: Query<(&mut Position, &Velocity)>) {
    for (mut position, velocity) in &mut query {
        position.x += velocity.x;
        position.y += velocity.y;
    }
}

fn main() {
    // Create a new empty World to hold our Entities and Components
    let mut world = World::new();

    // Spawn an entity with Position and Velocity components
    world.spawn((
        Position { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 },
        Velocity { x: 1.0, y: 0.0 },
    ));

    // Create a new Schedule, which defines an execution strategy for Systems
    let mut schedule = Schedule::default();

    // Add our system to the schedule
    schedule.add_systems(movement);

    // Run the schedule once. If your app has a "loop", you would run this once per loop
    schedule.run(&mut world);
}

Features

Query Filters

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Player;
#[derive(Component)]
struct Alive;

// Gets the Position component of all Entities with Player component and without the Alive
// component.
fn system(query: Query<&Position, (With<Player>, Without<Alive>)>) {
    for position in &query {
    }
}

Change Detection

Bevy ECS tracks all changes to Components and Resources.

Queries can filter for changed Components:

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }

// Gets the Position component of all Entities whose Velocity has changed since the last run of the System
fn system_changed(query: Query<&Position, Changed<Velocity>>) {
    for position in &query {
    }
}

// Gets the Position component of all Entities that had a Velocity component added since the last run of the System
fn system_added(query: Query<&Position, Added<Velocity>>) {
    for position in &query {
    }
}

Resources also expose change state:

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Resource)]
struct Time(f32);

// Prints "time changed!" if the Time resource has changed since the last run of the System
fn system(time: Res<Time>) {
    if time.is_changed() {
        println!("time changed!");
    }
}

Component Storage

Bevy ECS supports multiple component storage types.

Components can be stored in:

  • Tables: Fast and cache friendly iteration, but slower adding and removing of components. This is the default storage type.
  • Sparse Sets: Fast adding and removing of components, but slower iteration.

Component storage types are configurable, and they default to table storage if the storage is not manually defined.

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Component)]
struct TableStoredComponent;

#[derive(Component)]
#[component(storage = "SparseSet")]
struct SparseStoredComponent;

Component Bundles

Define sets of Components that should be added together.

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Player;
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Position { x: f32, y: f32 }
#[derive(Default, Component)]
struct Velocity { x: f32, y: f32 }

#[derive(Bundle, Default)]
struct PlayerBundle {
    player: Player,
    position: Position,
    velocity: Velocity,
}

let mut world = World::new();

// Spawn a new entity and insert the default PlayerBundle
world.spawn(PlayerBundle::default());

// Bundles play well with Rust's struct update syntax
world.spawn(PlayerBundle {
    position: Position { x: 1.0, y: 1.0 },
    ..Default::default()
});

Events

Events offer a communication channel between one or more systems. Events can be sent using the system parameter EventWriter and received with EventReader.

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Event)]
struct MyEvent {
    message: String,
}

fn writer(mut writer: EventWriter<MyEvent>) {
    writer.send(MyEvent {
        message: "hello!".to_string(),
    });
}

fn reader(mut reader: EventReader<MyEvent>) {
    for event in reader.read() {
    }
}

Observers

Observers are systems that listen for a "trigger" of a specific Event:

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Event)]
struct MyEvent {
    message: String
}

let mut world = World::new();

world.add_observer(|trigger: Trigger<MyEvent>| {
    println!("{}", trigger.event().message);
});

world.flush();

world.trigger(MyEvent {
    message: "hello!".to_string(),
});

These differ from EventReader and EventWriter in that they are "reactive". Rather than happening at a specific point in a schedule, they happen immediately whenever a trigger happens. Triggers can trigger other triggers, and they all will be evaluated at the same time!

Events can also be triggered to target specific entities:

use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;

#[derive(Event)]
struct Explode;

let mut world = World::new();
let entity = world.spawn_empty().id();

world.add_observer(|trigger: Trigger<Explode>, mut commands: Commands| {
    println!("Entity {} goes BOOM!", trigger.target());
    commands.entity(trigger.target()).despawn();
});

world.flush();

world.trigger_targets(Explode, entity);