# Objective
It's odd that `TextShadow` is accessible by importing `bevy::ui::*` but
`Text` isn't.
Move the `TextShadow` component to `text` widget module and move its
type registration to the `build_text_interop` function.
# Objective
This is part of the "core widgets" effort:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/19236.
## Solution
This adds the "core checkbox" widget type.
## Testing
Tested using examples core_widgets and core_widgets_observers.
Note to reviewers: I reorganized the code in the examples, so the diffs
are large because of code moves.
# Objective
#19366 implemented core button widgets, which included the `Depressed`
state component.
`Depressed` was chosen instead of `Pressed` to avoid conflict with the
`Pointer<Pressed>` event, but it is problematic and awkward in many
ways:
- Using the word "depressed" for such a high-traffic type is not great
due to the obvious connection to "depressed" as in depression.
- "Depressed" is not what I would search for if I was looking for a
component like this, and I'm not aware of any other engine or UI
framework using the term.
- `Depressed` is not a very natural pair to the `Pointer<Pressed>`
event.
- It might be because I'm not a native English speaker, but I have very
rarely heard someone say "a button is depressed". Seeing it, my mind
initially goes from "depression??" to "oh, de-pressed, meaning released"
and definitely not "is pressed", even though that *is* also a valid
meaning for it.
A related problem is that the current `Pointer<Pressed>` and
`Pointer<Released>` event names use a different verb tense than all of
our other observer events such as `Pointer<Click>` or
`Pointer<DragStart>`. By fixing this and renaming `Pressed` (and
`Released`), we can then use `Pressed` instead of `Depressed` for the
state component.
Additionally, the `IsHovered` and `IsDirectlyHovered` components added
in #19366 use an inconsistent naming; the other similar components don't
use an `Is` prefix. It also makes query filters like `Has<IsHovered>`
and `With<IsHovered>` a bit more awkward.
This is partially related to Cart's [picking concept
proposal](https://gist.github.com/cart/756e48a149db2838028be600defbd24a?permalink_comment_id=5598154).
## Solution
- Rename `Pointer<Pressed>` to `Pointer<Press>`
- Rename `Pointer<Released>` to `Pointer<Release>`
- Rename `Depressed` to `Pressed`
- Rename `IsHovered` to `Hovered`
- Rename `IsDirectlyHovered` to `DirectlyHovered`
# Objective
Part of #19236
## Solution
Adds a new `bevy_core_widgets` crate containing headless widget
implementations. This PR adds a single `CoreButton` widget, more widgets
to be added later once this is approved.
## Testing
There's an example, ui/core_widgets.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Add specialized UI transform `Component`s and fix some related problems:
* Animating UI elements by modifying the `Transform` component of UI
nodes doesn't work very well because `ui_layout_system` overwrites the
translations each frame. The `overflow_debug` example uses a horrible
hack where it copies the transform into the position that'll likely
cause a panic if any users naively copy it.
* Picking ignores rotation and scaling and assumes UI nodes are always
axis aligned.
* The clipping geometry stored in `CalculatedClip` is wrong for rotated
and scaled elements.
* Transform propagation is unnecessary for the UI, the transforms can be
updated during layout updates.
* The UI internals use both object-centered and top-left-corner-based
coordinates systems for UI nodes. Depending on the context you have to
add or subtract the half-size sometimes before transforming between
coordinate spaces. We should just use one system consistantly so that
the transform can always be directly applied.
* `Transform` doesn't support responsive coordinates.
## Solution
* Unrequire `Transform` from `Node`.
* New components `UiTransform`, `UiGlobalTransform`:
- `Node` requires `UiTransform`, `UiTransform` requires
`UiGlobalTransform`
- `UiTransform` is a 2d-only equivalent of `Transform` with a
translation in `Val`s.
- `UiGlobalTransform` newtypes `Affine2` and is updated in
`ui_layout_system`.
* New helper functions on `ComputedNode` for mapping between viewport
and local node space.
* The cursor position is transformed to local node space during picking
so that it respects rotations and scalings.
* To check if the cursor hovers a node recursively walk up the tree to
the root checking if any of the ancestor nodes clip the point at the
cursor. If the point is clipped the interaction is ignored.
* Use object-centered coordinates for UI nodes.
* `RelativeCursorPosition`'s coordinates are now object-centered with
(0,0) at the the center of the node and the corners at (±0.5, ±0.5).
* Replaced the `normalized_visible_node_rect: Rect` field of
`RelativeCursorPosition` with `cursor_over: bool`, which is set to true
when the cursor is over an unclipped point on the node. The visible area
of the node is not necessarily a rectangle, so the previous
implementation didn't work.
This should fix all the logical bugs with non-axis aligned interactions
and clipping. Rendering still needs changes but they are far outside the
scope of this PR.
Tried and abandoned two other approaches:
* New `transform` field on `Node`, require `GlobalTransform` on `Node`,
and unrequire `Transform` on `Node`. Unrequiring `Transform` opts out of
transform propagation so there is then no conflict with updating the
`GlobalTransform` in `ui_layout_system`. This was a nice change in its
simplicity but potentially confusing for users I think, all the
`GlobalTransform` docs mention `Transform` and having special rules for
how it's updated just for the UI is unpleasently surprising.
* New `transform` field on `Node`. Unrequire `Transform` on `Node`. New
`transform: Affine2` field on `ComputedNode`.
This was okay but I think most users want a separate specialized UI
transform components. The fat `ComputedNode` doesn't work well with
change detection.
Fixes#18929, #18930
## Testing
There is an example you can look at:
```
cargo run --example ui_transform
```
Sometimes in the example if you press the rotate button couple of times
the first glyph from the top label disappears , I'm not sure what's
causing it yet but I don't think it's related to this PR.
## Migration Guide
New specialized 2D UI transform components `UiTransform` and
`UiGlobalTransform`. `UiTransform` is a 2d-only equivalent of
`Transform` with a translation in `Val`s. `UiGlobalTransform` newtypes
`Affine2` and is updated in `ui_layout_system`.
`Node` now requires `UiTransform` instead of `Transform`. `UiTransform`
requires `UiGlobalTransform`.
In previous versions of Bevy `ui_layout_system` would overwrite UI
node's `Transform::translation` each frame. `UiTransform`s aren't
overwritten and there is no longer any need for systems that cache and
rewrite the transform for translated UI elements.
`RelativeCursorPosition`'s coordinates are now object-centered with
(0,0) at the the center of the node and the corners at (±0.5, ±0.5). Its
`normalized_visible_node_rect` field has been removed and replaced with
a new `cursor_over: bool` field which is set to true when the cursor is
hovering an unclipped area of the UI node.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Allowing drawing of UI nodes with a gradient instead of a flat color.
## Solution
The are three gradient structs corresponding to the three types of
gradients supported: `LinearGradient`, `ConicGradient` and
`RadialGradient`. These are then wrapped in a `Gradient` enum
discriminator which has `Linear`, `Conic` and `Radial` variants.
Each gradient type consists of the geometric properties for that
gradient and a list of color stops.
Color stops consist of a color, a position or angle and an optional
hint. If no position is specified for a stop, it's evenly spaced between
the previous and following stops. Color stop positions are absolute, if
you specify a list of stops:
```vec
Conic gradients can be used to draw simple pie charts like in CSS:
# Objective
Fixes a part of #14274.
Bevy has an incredibly inconsistent naming convention for its system
sets, both internally and across the ecosystem.
<img alt="System sets in Bevy"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d16e2027-793f-4ba4-9cc9-e780b14a5a1b"
width="450" />
*Names of public system set types in Bevy*
Most Bevy types use a naming of `FooSystem` or just `Foo`, but there are
also a few `FooSystems` and `FooSet` types. In ecosystem crates on the
other hand, `FooSet` is perhaps the most commonly used name in general.
Conventions being so wildly inconsistent can make it harder for users to
pick names for their own types, to search for system sets on docs.rs, or
to even discern which types *are* system sets.
To reign in the inconsistency a bit and help unify the ecosystem, it
would be good to establish a common recommended naming convention for
system sets in Bevy itself, similar to how plugins are commonly suffixed
with `Plugin` (ex: `TimePlugin`). By adopting a consistent naming
convention in first-party Bevy, we can softly nudge ecosystem crates to
follow suit (for types where it makes sense to do so).
Choosing a naming convention is also relevant now, as the [`bevy_cli`
recently adopted
lints](https://github.com/TheBevyFlock/bevy_cli/pull/345) to enforce
naming for plugins and system sets, and the recommended naming used for
system sets is still a bit open.
## Which Name To Use?
Now the contentious part: what naming convention should we actually
adopt?
This was discussed on the Bevy Discord at the end of last year, starting
[here](<https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1310659954683936789>).
`FooSet` and `FooSystems` were the clear favorites, with `FooSet` very
narrowly winning an unofficial poll. However, it seems to me like the
consensus was broadly moving towards `FooSystems` at the end and after
the poll, with Cart
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311140204974706708))
and later Alice
([source](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1311092530732859533))
and also me being in favor of it.
Let's do a quick pros and cons list! Of course these are just what I
thought of, so take it with a grain of salt.
`FooSet`:
- Pro: Nice and short!
- Pro: Used by many ecosystem crates.
- Pro: The `Set` suffix comes directly from the trait name `SystemSet`.
- Pro: Pairs nicely with existing APIs like `in_set` and
`configure_sets`.
- Con: `Set` by itself doesn't actually indicate that it's related to
systems *at all*, apart from the implemented trait. A set of what?
- Con: Is `FooSet` a set of `Foo`s or a system set related to `Foo`? Ex:
`ContactSet`, `MeshSet`, `EnemySet`...
`FooSystems`:
- Pro: Very clearly indicates that the type represents a collection of
systems. The actual core concept, system(s), is in the name.
- Pro: Parallels nicely with `FooPlugins` for plugin groups.
- Pro: Low risk of conflicts with other names or misunderstandings about
what the type is.
- Pro: In most cases, reads *very* nicely and clearly. Ex:
`PhysicsSystems` and `AnimationSystems` as opposed to `PhysicsSet` and
`AnimationSet`.
- Pro: Easy to search for on docs.rs.
- Con: Usually results in longer names.
- Con: Not yet as widely used.
Really the big problem with `FooSet` is that it doesn't actually
describe what it is. It describes what *kind of thing* it is (a set of
something), but not *what it is a set of*, unless you know the type or
check its docs or implemented traits. `FooSystems` on the other hand is
much more self-descriptive in this regard, at the cost of being a bit
longer to type.
Ultimately, in some ways it comes down to preference and how you think
of system sets. Personally, I was originally in favor of `FooSet`, but
have been increasingly on the side of `FooSystems`, especially after
seeing what the new names would actually look like in Avian and now
Bevy. I prefer it because it usually reads better, is much more clearly
related to groups of systems than `FooSet`, and overall *feels* more
correct and natural to me in the long term.
For these reasons, and because Alice and Cart also seemed to share a
preference for it when it was previously being discussed, I propose that
we adopt a `FooSystems` naming convention where applicable.
## Solution
Rename Bevy's system set types to use a consistent `FooSet` naming where
applicable.
- `AccessibilitySystem` → `AccessibilitySystems`
- `GizmoRenderSystem` → `GizmoRenderSystems`
- `PickSet` → `PickingSystems`
- `RunFixedMainLoopSystem` → `RunFixedMainLoopSystems`
- `TransformSystem` → `TransformSystems`
- `RemoteSet` → `RemoteSystems`
- `RenderSet` → `RenderSystems`
- `SpriteSystem` → `SpriteSystems`
- `StateTransitionSteps` → `StateTransitionSystems`
- `RenderUiSystem` → `RenderUiSystems`
- `UiSystem` → `UiSystems`
- `Animation` → `AnimationSystems`
- `AssetEvents` → `AssetEventSystems`
- `TrackAssets` → `AssetTrackingSystems`
- `UpdateGizmoMeshes` → `GizmoMeshSystems`
- `InputSystem` → `InputSystems`
- `InputFocusSet` → `InputFocusSystems`
- `ExtractMaterialsSet` → `MaterialExtractionSystems`
- `ExtractMeshesSet` → `MeshExtractionSystems`
- `RumbleSystem` → `RumbleSystems`
- `CameraUpdateSystem` → `CameraUpdateSystems`
- `ExtractAssetsSet` → `AssetExtractionSystems`
- `Update2dText` → `Text2dUpdateSystems`
- `TimeSystem` → `TimeSystems`
- `AudioPlaySet` → `AudioPlaybackSystems`
- `SendEvents` → `EventSenderSystems`
- `EventUpdates` → `EventUpdateSystems`
A lot of the names got slightly longer, but they are also a lot more
consistent, and in my opinion the majority of them read much better. For
a few of the names I took the liberty of rewording things a bit;
definitely open to any further naming improvements.
There are still also cases where the `FooSystems` naming doesn't really
make sense, and those I left alone. This primarily includes system sets
like `Interned<dyn SystemSet>`, `EnterSchedules<S>`, `ExitSchedules<S>`,
or `TransitionSchedules<S>`, where the type has some special purpose and
semantics.
## Todo
- [x] Should I keep all the old names as deprecated type aliases? I can
do this, but to avoid wasting work I'd prefer to first reach consensus
on whether these renames are even desired.
- [x] Migration guide
- [x] Release notes
# Objective
Add a viewport widget.
## Solution
- Add a new `ViewportNode` component to turn a UI node into a viewport.
- Add `viewport_picking` to pass pointer inputs from other pointers to
the viewport's pointer.
- Notably, this is somewhat functionally different from the viewport
widget in [the editor
prototype](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy_editor_prototypes/pull/110/files#L124),
which just moves the pointer's location onto the render target. Viewport
widgets have their own pointers.
- Care is taken to handle dragging in and out of viewports.
- Add `update_viewport_render_target_size` to update the viewport node's
render target's size if the node size changes.
- Feature gate picking-related viewport items behind
`bevy_ui_picking_backend`.
## Testing
I've been using an example I made to test the widget (and added it as
`viewport_node`):
<details><summary>Code</summary>
```rust
//! A simple scene to demonstrate spawning a viewport widget. The example will demonstrate how to
//! pick entities visible in the widget's view.
use bevy::picking::pointer::PointerInteraction;
use bevy::prelude::*;
use bevy::ui::widget::ViewportNode;
use bevy::{
image::{TextureFormatPixelInfo, Volume},
window::PrimaryWindow,
};
use bevy_render::{
camera::RenderTarget,
render_resource::{
Extent3d, TextureDescriptor, TextureDimension, TextureFormat, TextureUsages,
},
};
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_plugins((DefaultPlugins, MeshPickingPlugin))
.add_systems(Startup, test)
.add_systems(Update, draw_mesh_intersections)
.run();
}
#[derive(Component, Reflect, Debug)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct Shape;
fn test(
mut commands: Commands,
window: Query<&Window, With<PrimaryWindow>>,
mut images: ResMut<Assets<Image>>,
mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>,
mut materials: ResMut<Assets<StandardMaterial>>,
) {
// Spawn a UI camera
commands.spawn(Camera3d::default());
// Set up an texture for the 3D camera to render to
let window = window.get_single().unwrap();
let window_size = window.physical_size();
let size = Extent3d {
width: window_size.x,
height: window_size.y,
..default()
};
let format = TextureFormat::Bgra8UnormSrgb;
let image = Image {
data: Some(vec![0; size.volume() * format.pixel_size()]),
texture_descriptor: TextureDescriptor {
label: None,
size,
dimension: TextureDimension::D2,
format,
mip_level_count: 1,
sample_count: 1,
usage: TextureUsages::TEXTURE_BINDING
| TextureUsages::COPY_DST
| TextureUsages::RENDER_ATTACHMENT,
view_formats: &[],
},
..default()
};
let image_handle = images.add(image);
// Spawn the 3D camera
let camera = commands
.spawn((
Camera3d::default(),
Camera {
// Render this camera before our UI camera
order: -1,
target: RenderTarget::Image(image_handle.clone().into()),
..default()
},
))
.id();
// Spawn something for the 3D camera to look at
commands
.spawn((
Mesh3d(meshes.add(Cuboid::new(5.0, 5.0, 5.0))),
MeshMaterial3d(materials.add(Color::WHITE)),
Transform::from_xyz(0.0, 0.0, -10.0),
Shape,
))
// We can observe pointer events on our objects as normal, the
// `bevy::ui::widgets::viewport_picking` system will take care of ensuring our viewport
// clicks pass through
.observe(on_drag_cuboid);
// Spawn our viewport widget
commands
.spawn((
Node {
position_type: PositionType::Absolute,
top: Val::Px(50.0),
left: Val::Px(50.0),
width: Val::Px(200.0),
height: Val::Px(200.0),
border: UiRect::all(Val::Px(5.0)),
..default()
},
BorderColor(Color::WHITE),
ViewportNode::new(camera),
))
.observe(on_drag_viewport);
}
fn on_drag_viewport(drag: Trigger<Pointer<Drag>>, mut node_query: Query<&mut Node>) {
if matches!(drag.button, PointerButton::Secondary) {
let mut node = node_query.get_mut(drag.target()).unwrap();
if let (Val::Px(top), Val::Px(left)) = (node.top, node.left) {
node.left = Val::Px(left + drag.delta.x);
node.top = Val::Px(top + drag.delta.y);
};
}
}
fn on_drag_cuboid(drag: Trigger<Pointer<Drag>>, mut transform_query: Query<&mut Transform>) {
if matches!(drag.button, PointerButton::Primary) {
let mut transform = transform_query.get_mut(drag.target()).unwrap();
transform.rotate_y(drag.delta.x * 0.02);
transform.rotate_x(drag.delta.y * 0.02);
}
}
fn draw_mesh_intersections(
pointers: Query<&PointerInteraction>,
untargetable: Query<Entity, Without<Shape>>,
mut gizmos: Gizmos,
) {
for (point, normal) in pointers
.iter()
.flat_map(|interaction| interaction.iter())
.filter_map(|(entity, hit)| {
if !untargetable.contains(*entity) {
hit.position.zip(hit.normal)
} else {
None
}
})
{
gizmos.arrow(point, point + normal.normalize() * 0.5, Color::WHITE);
}
}
```
</details>
## Showcase
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/39f44eac-2c2a-4fd9-a606-04171f806dc1
## Open Questions
- <del>Not sure whether the entire widget should be feature gated behind
`bevy_ui_picking_backend` or not? I chose a partial approach since maybe
someone will want to use the widget without any picking being
involved.</del>
- <del>Is `PickSet::Last` the expected set for `viewport_picking`?
Perhaps `PickSet::Input` is more suited.</del>
- <del>Can `dragged_last_frame` be removed in favor of a better dragging
check? Another option that comes to mind is reading `Drag` and `DragEnd`
events, but this seems messier.</del>
---------
Co-authored-by: ickshonpe <david.curthoys@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
# Objective
Add background colors for text.
Fixes#18889
## Solution
New component `TextBackgroundColor`, add it to any UI `Text` or
`TextSpan` entity to add a background color to its text.
New field on `TextLayoutInfo` `section_rects` holds the list of bounding
rects for each text section.
The bounding rects are generated in `TextPipeline::queue_text` during
text layout, `extract_text_background_colors` extracts the colored
background rects for rendering.
Didn't include `Text2d` support because of z-order issues.
The section rects can also be used to implement interactions targeting
individual text sections.
## Testing
Includes a basic example that can be used for testing:
```
cargo run --example text_background_colors
```
---
## Showcase
Using a proportional font with kerning the results aren't so tidy (since
the bounds of adjacent glyphs can overlap) but it still works fine:
---------
Co-authored-by: Olle Lukowski <lukowskiolle@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gilles Henaux <ghx_github_priv@fastmail.com>
# Objective
@cart noticed some issues with my work in
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/17348#discussion_r2001815637,
which I somehow missed before merging the PR.
## Solution
- feature gate the UiPickingPlugin correctly
- don't manually add the picking plugins
## Testing
Ran the debug_picking and sprite_picking examples (for UI and sprites
respectively): both seem to work fine.
# Objective
Currently, our picking backends are inconsistent:
- Mesh picking and sprite picking both have configurable opt in/out
behavior. UI picking does not.
- Sprite picking uses `SpritePickingCamera` and `Pickable` for control,
but mesh picking uses `RayCastPickable`.
- `MeshPickingPlugin` is not a part of `DefaultPlugins`.
`SpritePickingPlugin` and `UiPickingPlugin` are.
## Solution
- Add configurable opt in/out behavior to UI picking (defaults to opt
out).
- Replace `RayCastPickable` with `MeshPickingCamera` and `Pickable`.
- Remove `SpritePickingPlugin` and `UiPickingPlugin` from
`DefaultPlugins`.
## Testing
Ran some examples.
## Migration Guide
`UiPickingPlugin` and `SpritePickingPlugin` are no longer included in
`DefaultPlugins`. They must be explicitly added.
`RayCastPickable` has been replaced in favor of the `MeshPickingCamera`
and `Pickable` components. You should add them to cameras and entities,
respectively, if you have `MeshPickingSettings::require_markers` set to
`true`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
It's difficult to understand or make changes to the UI systems because
of how each system needs to individually track changes to scale factor,
windows and camera targets in local hashmaps, particularly for new
contributors. Any major change inevitably introduces new scale factor
bugs.
Instead of per-system resolution we can resolve the camera target info
for all UI nodes in a system at the start of `PostUpdate` and then store
it per-node in components that can be queried with change detection.
Fixes#17578Fixes#15143
## Solution
Store the UI render target's data locally per node in a component that
is updated in `PostUpdate` before any other UI systems run.
This component can be then be queried with change detection so that UI
systems no longer need to have knowledge of cameras and windows and
don't require fragile custom change detection solutions using local
hashmaps.
## Showcase
Compare `measure_text_system` from main (which has a bug the causes it
to use the wrong scale factor when a node's camera target changes):
```
pub fn measure_text_system(
mut scale_factors_buffer: Local<EntityHashMap<f32>>,
mut last_scale_factors: Local<EntityHashMap<f32>>,
fonts: Res<Assets<Font>>,
camera_query: Query<(Entity, &Camera)>,
default_ui_camera: DefaultUiCamera,
ui_scale: Res<UiScale>,
mut text_query: Query<
(
Entity,
Ref<TextLayout>,
&mut ContentSize,
&mut TextNodeFlags,
&mut ComputedTextBlock,
Option<&UiTargetCamera>,
),
With<Node>,
>,
mut text_reader: TextUiReader,
mut text_pipeline: ResMut<TextPipeline>,
mut font_system: ResMut<CosmicFontSystem>,
) {
scale_factors_buffer.clear();
let default_camera_entity = default_ui_camera.get();
for (entity, block, content_size, text_flags, computed, maybe_camera) in &mut text_query {
let Some(camera_entity) = maybe_camera
.map(UiTargetCamera::entity)
.or(default_camera_entity)
else {
continue;
};
let scale_factor = match scale_factors_buffer.entry(camera_entity) {
Entry::Occupied(entry) => *entry.get(),
Entry::Vacant(entry) => *entry.insert(
camera_query
.get(camera_entity)
.ok()
.and_then(|(_, c)| c.target_scaling_factor())
.unwrap_or(1.0)
* ui_scale.0,
),
};
if last_scale_factors.get(&camera_entity) != Some(&scale_factor)
|| computed.needs_rerender()
|| text_flags.needs_measure_fn
|| content_size.is_added()
{
create_text_measure(
entity,
&fonts,
scale_factor.into(),
text_reader.iter(entity),
block,
&mut text_pipeline,
content_size,
text_flags,
computed,
&mut font_system,
);
}
}
core::mem::swap(&mut *last_scale_factors, &mut *scale_factors_buffer);
}
```
with `measure_text_system` from this PR (which always uses the correct
scale factor):
```
pub fn measure_text_system(
fonts: Res<Assets<Font>>,
mut text_query: Query<
(
Entity,
Ref<TextLayout>,
&mut ContentSize,
&mut TextNodeFlags,
&mut ComputedTextBlock,
Ref<ComputedNodeTarget>,
),
With<Node>,
>,
mut text_reader: TextUiReader,
mut text_pipeline: ResMut<TextPipeline>,
mut font_system: ResMut<CosmicFontSystem>,
) {
for (entity, block, content_size, text_flags, computed, computed_target) in &mut text_query {
// Note: the ComputedTextBlock::needs_rerender bool is cleared in create_text_measure().
if computed_target.is_changed()
|| computed.needs_rerender()
|| text_flags.needs_measure_fn
|| content_size.is_added()
{
create_text_measure(
entity,
&fonts,
computed_target.scale_factor.into(),
text_reader.iter(entity),
block,
&mut text_pipeline,
content_size,
text_flags,
computed,
&mut font_system,
);
}
}
}
```
## Testing
I removed an alarming number of tests from the `layout` module but they
were mostly to do with the deleted camera synchronisation logic. The
remaining tests should all pass now.
The most relevant examples are `multiple_windows` and `split_screen`,
the behaviour of both should be unchanged from main.
---------
Co-authored-by: UkoeHB <37489173+UkoeHB@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#17718
## Solution
Schedule `text_system` before `AssetEvents`.
I guess what was happening here is that glyphs weren't shown because
`text_system` was running before `AssetEevents` and so `prepare_uinodes`
never recieves the the asset modified event about the glyph texture
atlas image.
# Objective
Basic `TextShadow` support.
## Solution
New `TextShadow` component with `offset` and `color` fields. Just insert
it on a `Text` node to add a shadow.
New system `extract_text_shadows` handles rendering.
It's not "real" shadows just the text redrawn with an offset and a
different colour. Blur-radius support will need changes to the shaders
and be a lot more complicated, whereas this still looks okay and took a
couple of minutes to implement.
I added the `TextShadow` component to `bevy_ui` rather than `bevy_text`
because it only supports the UI atm.
We can add a `Text2d` version in a followup but getting the same effect
in `Text2d` is trivial even without official support.
---
## Showcase
<img width="122" alt="text_shadow"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0333d167-c507-4262-b93b-b6d39e2cf3a4"
/>
<img width="136" alt="g"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b01d5d9-55c9-4af7-9360-a7b04f55944d"
/>
# Objective
It's not immediately obvious that `TargetCamera` only works with UI node
entities. It's natural to assume from looking at something like the
`multiple_windows` example that it will work with everything.
## Solution
Rename `TargetCamera` to `UiTargetCamera`.
## Migration Guide
`TargetCamera` has been renamed to `UiTargetCamera`.
# Objective
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111
## Solution
Move `#![warn(clippy::allow_attributes,
clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason)]` to the workspace `Cargo.toml`
## Testing
Lots of CI testing, and local testing too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
# Objective
I realized that setting these to `deny` may have been a little
aggressive - especially since we upgrade warnings to denies in CI.
## Solution
Downgrades these lints to `warn`, so that compiles can work locally. CI
will still treat these as denies.
# Objective
- https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17111
## Solution
Set the `clippy::allow_attributes` and
`clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason` lints to `deny`, and bring
`bevy_ui` in line with the new restrictions.
## Testing
`cargo clippy --tests` and `cargo test --package bevy_ui` were run, and
no errors were encountered.
Currently, `check_visibility` is parameterized over a query filter that
specifies the type of potentially-visible object. This has the
unfortunate side effect that we need a separate system,
`mark_view_visibility_as_changed_if_necessary`, to trigger view
visibility change detection. That system is quite slow because it must
iterate sequentially over all entities in the scene.
This PR moves the query filter from `check_visibility` to a new
component, `VisibilityClass`. `VisibilityClass` stores a list of type
IDs, each corresponding to one of the query filters we used to use.
Because `check_visibility` is no longer specialized to the query filter
at the type level, Bevy now only needs to invoke it once, leading to
better performance as `check_visibility` can do change detection on the
fly rather than delegating it to a separate system.
This commit also has ergonomic improvements, as there's no need for
applications that want to add their own custom renderable components to
add specializations of the `check_visibility` system to the schedule.
Instead, they only need to ensure that the `ViewVisibility` component is
properly kept up to date. The recommended way to do this, and the way
that's demonstrated in the `custom_phase_item` and
`specialized_mesh_pipeline` examples, is to make `ViewVisibility` a
required component and to add the type ID to it in a component add hook.
This patch does this for `Mesh3d`, `Mesh2d`, `Sprite`, `Light`, and
`Node`, which means that most app code doesn't need to change at all.
Note that, although this patch has a large impact on the performance of
visibility determination, it doesn't actually improve the end-to-end
frame time of `many_cubes`. That's because the render world was already
effectively hiding the latency from
`mark_view_visibility_as_changed_if_necessary`. This patch is, however,
necessary for *further* improvements to `many_cubes` performance.
`many_cubes` trace before:
`many_cubes` trace after:
## Migration Guide
* `check_visibility` no longer takes a `QueryFilter`, and there's no
need to add it manually to your app schedule anymore for custom
rendering items. Instead, entities with custom renderable components
should add the appropriate type IDs to `VisibilityClass`. See
`custom_phase_item` for an example.
# Objective
We were waiting for 1.83 to address most of these, due to a bug with
`missing_docs` and `expect`. Relates to, but does not entirely complete,
#15059.
## Solution
- Upgrade to 1.83
- Switch `allow(missing_docs)` to `expect(missing_docs)`
- Remove a few now-unused `allow`s along the way, or convert to `expect`
# Objective
- Register `BoxShadow` type for reflection
## Testing
- Tested that box shadow example compiles and runs
## Additional
- It would be nice to have this in 0.15.1
# Objective
Draw the UI debug overlay using the UI renderer.
Significantly simpler and easier to use than
`bevy_dev_tools::ui_debug_overlay` which uses `bevy_gizmos`.
* Supports multiple windows and UI rendered to texture.
* Draws rounded debug rects for rounded UI nodes.
Fixes#16666
## Solution
Removed the `ui_debug_overlay` module from `bevy_dev_tools`.
Added a `bevy_ui_debug` feature gate.
Draw the UI debug overlay using the UI renderer.
Adds a new module `bevy_ui::render::debug_overlay`.
The debug overlay extraction function queries for the existing UI layout
and then adds a border around each UI node with `u32::MAX / 2` added to
each stack index so it's drawn on top.
There is a `UiDebugOptions` resource that can be used to enable or
disable the debug overlay and set the line width.
## Testing
The `testbed_ui` example has been changed to use the new debug overlay:
```
cargo run --example testbed_ui --features bevy_ui_debug
```
Press Space to toggle the debug overlay on and off.
---
## Showcase
<img width="961" alt="testbed-ui-new-debug"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9523d18-39ae-46a8-adbe-7d3f3ab8e951">
## Migration Guide
The `ui_debug_overlay` module has been removed from `bevy_dev_tools`.
There is a new debug overlay implemented using the `bevy_ui` renderer.
To use it, enable the `bevy_ui_debug` feature and set the `enable` field
of the `UiDebugOptions` resource to `true`.
# Objective
The `UiBoxShadowSamples` resource should be renamed to
`BoxShadowSamples` so it matches the `BoxShadow` component.
## Migration Guide
`UiBoxShadowSamples` has been renamed to `BoxShadowSamples`
# Objective
- Fixes#16472.
## Solution
- Add flags to `SpritePlugin` and `UiPlugin` to disable their picking
backends.
## Testing
- The change is pretty trivial, so not much to test!
---
## Migration Guide
- `UiPlugin` now contains an extra `add_picking` field if
`bevy_ui_picking_backend` is enabled.
- `SpritePlugin` is no longer a unit struct, and has one field if
`bevy_sprite_picking_backend` is enabled (otherwise no fields).
# Objective
Needing to derive `AnimationEvent` for `Event` is unnecessary, and the
trigger logic coupled to it feels like we're coupling "event producer"
logic with the event itself, which feels wrong. It also comes with a
bunch of complexity, which is again unnecessary. We can have the
flexibility of "custom animation event trigger logic" without this
coupling and complexity.
The current `animation_events` example is also needlessly complicated,
due to it needing to work around system ordering issues. The docs
describing it are also slightly wrong. We can make this all a non-issue
by solving the underlying ordering problem.
Related to this, we use the `bevy_animation::Animation` system set to
solve PostUpdate animation order-of-operations issues. If we move this
to bevy_app as part of our "core schedule", we can cut out needless
`bevy_animation` crate dependencies in these instances.
## Solution
- Remove `AnimationEvent`, the derive, and all other infrastructure
associated with it (such as the `bevy_animation/derive` crate)
- Replace all instances of `AnimationEvent` traits with `Event + Clone`
- Store and use functions for custom animation trigger logic (ex:
`clip.add_event_fn()`). For "normal" cases users dont need to think
about this and should use the simpler `clip.add_event()`
- Run the `Animation` system set _before_ updating text
- Move `bevy_animation::Animation` to `bevy_app::Animation`. Remove
unnecessary `bevy_animation` dependency from `bevy_ui`
- Adjust `animation_events` example to use the simpler `clip.add_event`
API, as the workarounds are no longer necessary
This is polishing work that will land in 0.15, and I think it is simple
enough and valuable enough to land in 0.15 with it, in the interest of
making the feature as compelling as possible.
# Objective
1. UI texture slicing chops and scales an image to fit the size of a
node and isn't meant to place any constraints on the size of the node
itself, but because the required components changes required `ImageSize`
and `ContentSize` for nodes with `UiImage`, texture sliced nodes are
laid out using an `ImageMeasure`.
2. In 0.14 users could spawn a `(UiImage, NodeBundle)` which would
display an image stretched to fill the UI node's bounds ignoring the
image's instrinsic size. Now that `UiImage` requires `ContentSize`,
there's no option to display an image without its size placing
constrains on the UI layout (unless you force the `Node` to a fixed
size, but that's not a solution).
3. It's desirable that the `Sprite` and `UiImage` share similar APIs.
Fixes#16109
## Solution
* Remove the `Component` impl from `ImageScaleMode`.
* Add a `Stretch` variant to `ImageScaleMode`.
* Add a field `scale_mode: ImageScaleMode` to `Sprite`.
* Add a field `mode: UiImageMode` to `UiImage`.
* Add an enum `UiImageMode` similar to `ImageScaleMode` but with
additional UI specific variants.
* Remove the queries for `ImageScaleMode` from Sprite and UI extraction,
and refer to the new fields instead.
* Change `ui_layout_system` to update measure funcs on any change to
`ContentSize`s to enable manual clearing without removing the component.
* Don't add a measure unless `UiImageMode::Auto` is set in
`update_image_content_size_system`. Mutably deref the `Mut<ContentSize>`
if the `UiImage` is changed to force removal of any existing measure
func.
## Testing
Remove all the constraints from the ui_texture_slice example:
```rust
//! This example illustrates how to create buttons with their textures sliced
//! and kept in proportion instead of being stretched by the button dimensions
use bevy::{
color::palettes::css::{GOLD, ORANGE},
prelude::*,
winit::WinitSettings,
};
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
// Only run the app when there is user input. This will significantly reduce CPU/GPU use.
.insert_resource(WinitSettings::desktop_app())
.add_systems(Startup, setup)
.add_systems(Update, button_system)
.run();
}
fn button_system(
mut interaction_query: Query<
(&Interaction, &Children, &mut UiImage),
(Changed<Interaction>, With<Button>),
>,
mut text_query: Query<&mut Text>,
) {
for (interaction, children, mut image) in &mut interaction_query {
let mut text = text_query.get_mut(children[0]).unwrap();
match *interaction {
Interaction::Pressed => {
**text = "Press".to_string();
image.color = GOLD.into();
}
Interaction::Hovered => {
**text = "Hover".to_string();
image.color = ORANGE.into();
}
Interaction::None => {
**text = "Button".to_string();
image.color = Color::WHITE;
}
}
}
}
fn setup(mut commands: Commands, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>) {
let image = asset_server.load("textures/fantasy_ui_borders/panel-border-010.png");
let slicer = TextureSlicer {
border: BorderRect::square(22.0),
center_scale_mode: SliceScaleMode::Stretch,
sides_scale_mode: SliceScaleMode::Stretch,
max_corner_scale: 1.0,
};
// ui camera
commands.spawn(Camera2d);
commands
.spawn(Node {
width: Val::Percent(100.0),
height: Val::Percent(100.0),
align_items: AlignItems::Center,
justify_content: JustifyContent::Center,
..default()
})
.with_children(|parent| {
for [w, h] in [[150.0, 150.0], [300.0, 150.0], [150.0, 300.0]] {
parent
.spawn((
Button,
Node {
// width: Val::Px(w),
// height: Val::Px(h),
// horizontally center child text
justify_content: JustifyContent::Center,
// vertically center child text
align_items: AlignItems::Center,
margin: UiRect::all(Val::Px(20.0)),
..default()
},
UiImage::new(image.clone()),
ImageScaleMode::Sliced(slicer.clone()),
))
.with_children(|parent| {
// parent.spawn((
// Text::new("Button"),
// TextFont {
// font: asset_server.load("fonts/FiraSans-Bold.ttf"),
// font_size: 33.0,
// ..default()
// },
// TextColor(Color::srgb(0.9, 0.9, 0.9)),
// ));
});
}
});
}
```
This should result in a blank window, since without any constraints the
texture slice image nodes should be zero-sized. But in main the image
nodes are given the size of the underlying unsliced source image
`textures/fantasy_ui_borders/panel-border-010.png`:
<img width="321" alt="slicing"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cbd74c9c-14cd-4b4d-93c6-7c0152bb05ee">
For this PR need to change the lines:
```
UiImage::new(image.clone()),
ImageScaleMode::Sliced(slicer.clone()),
```
to
```
UiImage::new(image.clone()).with_mode(UiImageMode::Sliced(slicer.clone()),
```
and then nothing should be rendered, as desired.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Objective
`UiImage` isn't just a general image component now, it's the defining
component for the image widget so it belongs in the image widget's
module.
# Objective
- `MeshPickingBackend` and `SpritePickingBackend` do not have the
`Plugin` suffix
- `DefaultPickingPlugins` is masquerading as a `Plugin` when in reality
it should be a `PluginGroup`
- Fixes#16081.
## Solution
- Rename some structures:
|Original Name|New Name|
|-|-|
|`MeshPickingBackend`|`MeshPickingPlugin`|
|`MeshPickingBackendSettings`|`MeshPickingSettings`|
|`SpritePickingBackend`|`SpritePickingPlugin`|
|`UiPickingBackendPlugin`|`UiPickingPlugin`|
- Make `DefaultPickingPlugins` a `PluginGroup`.
- Because `DefaultPickingPlugins` is within the `DefaultPlugins` plugin
group, I also added support for nested plugin groups to the
`plugin_group!` macro.
## Testing
- I used ripgrep to ensure all references were properly renamed.
- For the `plugin_group!` macro, I used `cargo expand` to manually
inspect the expansion of `DefaultPlugins`.
---
## Migration Guide
> [!NOTE]
>
> All 3 of the changed structures were added after 0.14, so this does
not need to be included in the 0.14 to 0.15 migration guide.
- `MeshPickingBackend` is now named `MeshPickingPlugin`.
- `MeshPickingBackendSettings` is now named `MeshPickingSettings`.
- `SpritePickingBackend` is now named `SpritePickingPlugin`.
- `UiPickingBackendPlugin` is now named `UiPickingPlugin`.
- `DefaultPickingPlugins` is now a a `PluginGroup` instead of a
`Plugin`.
# Objective
Make UI rendering optional.
Quite a few people have been experimenting with using Bevy UI for layout
and interaction but replacing the rendering with `bevy_prototype_lyon`
or whatever. It's awkward to do though as there is no way to disable the
existing UI rendering requiring users to create their own custom node
bundles and components. Also, you can't replace the UI's shader and a
number of other things.
This PR makes the setup and initialization of UI rendering for the
RenderApp optional. Then you can do whatever you want by replacing
`build_ui_render` with your own function. For instance, one that loads a
custom shader.
The UI layout and interaction components are still updated as normal.
## Solution
Add a field `enable_rendering` to `UiPlugin`.
Only call `build_ui_render` and initialize the `UiPipeline` if
`enable_rendering` is false.
I thought about implementing a "bevy_ui_render" feature but suspect
everything is too tightly coupled atm and it would be very fragile.
Similar to the struggles with the "bevy_text" feature but worse.
---
## Changelog
`UiPlugin`
* Added a bool field `enable_rendering`.
* Only calls `build_ui_render` and initializes the `UiPipeline` if
`enable_rendering` is true.
## Migration Guide
`UiPlugin` has a new field `enable_rendering`. If set to false, the UI's
rendering systems won't be added to the `RenderApp` and no UI elements
will be drawn. The layout and interaction components will still be
updated as normal.
# Objective
Continue improving the user experience of our UI Node API in the
direction specified by [Bevy's Next Generation Scene / UI
System](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437)
## Solution
As specified in the document above, merge `Style` fields into `Node`,
and move "computed Node fields" into `ComputedNode` (I chose this name
over something like `ComputedNodeLayout` because it currently contains
more than just layout info. If we want to break this up / rename these
concepts, lets do that in a separate PR). `Style` has been removed.
This accomplishes a number of goals:
## Ergonomics wins
Specifying both `Node` and `Style` is now no longer required for
non-default styles
Before:
```rust
commands.spawn((
Node::default(),
Style {
width: Val::Px(100.),
..default()
},
));
```
After:
```rust
commands.spawn(Node {
width: Val::Px(100.),
..default()
});
```
## Conceptual clarity
`Style` was never a comprehensive "style sheet". It only defined "core"
style properties that all `Nodes` shared. Any "styled property" that
couldn't fit that mold had to be in a separate component. A "real" style
system would style properties _across_ components (`Node`, `Button`,
etc). We have plans to build a true style system (see the doc linked
above).
By moving the `Style` fields to `Node`, we fully embrace `Node` as the
driving concept and remove the "style system" confusion.
## Next Steps
* Consider identifying and splitting out "style properties that aren't
core to Node". This should not happen for Bevy 0.15.
---
## Migration Guide
Move any fields set on `Style` into `Node` and replace all `Style`
component usage with `Node`.
Before:
```rust
commands.spawn((
Node::default(),
Style {
width: Val::Px(100.),
..default()
},
));
```
After:
```rust
commands.spawn(Node {
width: Val::Px(100.),
..default()
});
```
For any usage of the "computed node properties" that used to live on
`Node`, use `ComputedNode` instead:
Before:
```rust
fn system(nodes: Query<&Node>) {
for node in &nodes {
let computed_size = node.size();
}
}
```
After:
```rust
fn system(computed_nodes: Query<&ComputedNode>) {
for computed_node in &computed_nodes {
let computed_size = computed_node.size();
}
}
```
# Objective
As discussed in #15341, ghost nodes are a contentious and experimental
feature. In the interest of enabling ecosystem experimentation, we've
decided to keep them in Bevy 0.15.
That said, we don't use them internally, and don't expect third-party
crates to support them. If the experimentation returns a negative result
(they aren't very useful, an alternative design is preferred etc) they
will be removed.
We should clearly communicate this status to users, and make sure that
users don't use ghost nodes in their projects without a very clear
understanding of what they're getting themselves into.
## Solution
To make life easy for users (and Bevy), `GhostNode` and all associated
helpers remain public and are always available.
However, actually constructing these requires enabling a feature flag
that's clearly marked as experimental. To do so, I've added a
meaningless private field.
When the feature flag is enabled, our constructs (`new` and `default`)
can be used. I've added a `new` constructor, which should be preferred
over `Default::default` as that can be readily deprecated, allowing us
to prompt users to swap over to the much nicer `GhostNode` syntax once
this is a unit struct again.
Full credit: this was mostly @cart's design: I'm just implementing it!
## Testing
I've run the ghost_nodes example and it fails to compile without the
feature flag. With the feature flag, it works fine :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au>
# Objective
Remove `bevy-ui`'s non-functional "bevy_text" feature.
Fixes#15900
## Solution
Remove all the "bevy_text" cfg gates.
I tried to fix it at first but couldn't figure it out. I'll happily
withdraw this in favour of another PR that gets the feature gate
working.
This is 3 of 5 iterative PR's that affect bevy_ui/layout
- [x] Blocked by https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/12801
- [x] Blocked by https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/12802
---
# Objective
- Add tests to `UiSurface`
- Add missing asserts in `_assert_send_sync_ui_surface_impl_safe`
- Add missing Debug field print for `camera_entity_to_taffy`
## Solution
- Adds tests to `UiSurface`
- Adds missing asserts in `_assert_send_sync_ui_surface_impl_safe`
- Adds missing impl Debug field print for `camera_entity_to_taffy`
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Cleanup naming and docs, add missing migration guide after #15591
All text root nodes now use `Text` (UI) / `Text2d`.
All text readers/writers use `Text<Type>Reader`/`Text<Type>Writer`
convention.
---
## Migration Guide
Doubles as #15591 migration guide.
Text bundles (`TextBundle` and `Text2dBundle`) were removed in favor of
`Text` and `Text2d`.
Shared configuration fields were replaced with `TextLayout`, `TextFont`
and `TextColor` components.
Just `TextBundle`'s additional field turned into `TextNodeFlags`
component,
while `Text2dBundle`'s additional fields turned into `TextBounds` and
`Anchor` components.
Text sections were removed in favor of hierarchy-based approach.
For root text entities with `Text` or `Text2d` components, child
entities with `TextSpan` will act as additional text sections.
To still access text spans by index, use the new `TextUiReader`,
`Text2dReader` and `TextUiWriter`, `Text2dWriter` system parameters.
**Ready for review. Examples migration progress: 100%.**
# Objective
- Implement https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/15014
## Solution
This implements [cart's
proposal](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/15014#discussioncomment-10574459)
faithfully except for one change. I separated `TextSpan` from
`TextSpan2d` because `TextSpan` needs to require the `GhostNode`
component, which is a `bevy_ui` component only usable by UI.
Extra changes:
- Added `EntityCommands::commands_mut` that returns a mutable reference.
This is a blocker for extension methods that return something other than
`self`. Note that `sickle_ui`'s `UiBuilder::commands` returns a mutable
reference for this reason.
## Testing
- [x] Text examples all work.
---
## Showcase
TODO: showcase-worthy
## Migration Guide
TODO: very breaking
### Accessing text spans by index
Text sections are now text sections on different entities in a
hierarchy, Use the new `TextReader` and `TextWriter` system parameters
to access spans by index.
Before:
```rust
fn refresh_text(mut query: Query<&mut Text, With<TimeText>>, time: Res<Time>) {
let text = query.single_mut();
text.sections[1].value = format_time(time.elapsed());
}
```
After:
```rust
fn refresh_text(
query: Query<Entity, With<TimeText>>,
mut writer: UiTextWriter,
time: Res<Time>
) {
let entity = query.single();
*writer.text(entity, 1) = format_time(time.elapsed());
}
```
### Iterating text spans
Text spans are now entities in a hierarchy, so the new `UiTextReader`
and `UiTextWriter` system parameters provide ways to iterate that
hierarchy. The `UiTextReader::iter` method will give you a normal
iterator over spans, and `UiTextWriter::for_each` lets you visit each of
the spans.
---------
Co-authored-by: ickshonpe <david.curthoys@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Closes#15720
## Solution
Wrap the handle in a new wrapper component: `UiMaterialHandle`
It's not possible to match the naming convention of `MeshMaterial3d/2d`
here with the trait already being called `UiMaterial`
Should we consider renaming to `Material3d/2dHandle` and `Mesh3d/2d` to
`Mesh3d/2dHandle`?
- This shouldn't have any merge conflicts with #15591
## Testing
Tested the `ui_material` example
## Migration Guide
Let's defer the migration guide to the required component port. I just
want to yeet the `Component` impl on `Handle` in the meantime :)
# Objective
UI box shadow support
Adds a new component `BoxShadow`:
```rust
pub struct BoxShadow {
/// The shadow's color
pub color: Color,
/// Horizontal offset
pub x_offset: Val,
/// Vertical offset
pub y_offset: Val,
/// Horizontal difference in size from the occluding uninode
pub spread_radius: Val,
/// Blurriness of the shadow
pub blur_radius: Val,
}
```
To use `BoxShadow`, add the component to any Bevy UI node and a shadow
will be drawn beneath that node.
Also adds a resource `BoxShadowSamples` that can be used to adjust the
shadow quality.
#### Notes
* I'm not super happy with the field names. Maybe we need a `struct Size
{ width: Val, height: Val }` type or something.
* The shader isn't very optimised but I don't see that it's too
important for now as the number of shadows being rendered is not going
to be massive most of the time. I think it's more important to get the
API and geometry correct with this PR.
* I didn't implement an inset property, it's not essential and can
easily be added in a follow up.
* Shadows are only rendered for uinodes, not for images or text.
* Batching isn't supported, it would need out-of-the-scope-of-this-pr
changes to the way the UI handles z-ordering for it to be effective.
# Showcase
```cargo run --example box_shadow -- --samples 4```
<img width="391" alt="br" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e8add96-dc93-46e0-9e35-d995eb0943ad">
```cargo run --example box_shadow -- --samples 10```
<img width="391" alt="s10"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ecb384c9-4012-4cd6-9dea-5180904bf28e">
# Objective
- Fixes#14826
- For context, see #15238
## Solution
Add a `GhostNode` component to `bevy_ui` and update all the relevant
systems to use it to traverse for UI children.
- [x] `ghost_hierarchy` module
- [x] Add `GhostNode`
- [x] Add `UiRootNodes` system param for iterating (ghost-aware) UI root
nodes
- [x] Add `UiChildren` system param for iterating (ghost-aware) UI
children
- [x] Update `layout::ui_layout_system`
- [x] Use ghost-aware root nodes for camera updates
- [x] Update and remove children in taffy
- [x] Initial spawn
- [x] Detect changes on nested UI children
- [x] Use ghost-aware children traversal in
`update_uinode_geometry_recursive`
- [x] Update the rest of the UI systems to use the ghost hierarchy
- [x] `stack::ui_stack_system`
- [x] `update::`
- [x] `update_clipping_system`
- [x] `update_target_camera_system`
- [x] `accessibility::calc_name`
## Testing
- [x] Added a new example `ghost_nodes` that can be used as a testbed.
- [x] Added unit tests for _some_ of the traversal utilities in
`ghost_hierarchy`
- [x] Ensure this fulfills the needs for currently known use cases
- [x] Reactivity libraries (test with `bevy_reactor`)
- [ ] Text spans (mentioned by koe [on
discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1285371432460881991/1285377442998915246))
---
## Performance
[See comment
below](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15341#issuecomment-2385456820)
## Migration guide
Any code that previously relied on `Parent`/`Children` to iterate UI
children may now want to use `bevy_ui::UiChildren` to ensure ghost nodes
are skipped, and their first descendant Nodes included.
UI root nodes may now be children of ghost nodes, which means
`Without<Parent>` might not query all root nodes. Use
`bevy_ui::UiRootNodes` where needed to iterate root nodes instead.
## Potential future work
- Benchmarking/optimizations of hierarchies containing lots of ghost
nodes
- Further exploration of UI hierarchies and markers for root nodes/leaf
nodes to create better ergonomics for things like `UiLayer` (world-space
ui)
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UkoeHB <37489173+UkoeHB@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#6370
- Closes#6581
## Solution
- Added the following lints to the workspace:
- `std_instead_of_core`
- `std_instead_of_alloc`
- `alloc_instead_of_core`
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [item level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Item%5C%3A)
to split all `use` statements into single items.
- Used `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix
--allow-dirty` to _attempt_ to resolve the new linting issues, and
intervened where the lint was unable to resolve the issue automatically
(usually due to needing an `extern crate alloc;` statement in a crate
root).
- Manually removed certain uses of `std` where negative feature gating
prevented `--all-features` from finding the offending uses.
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [crate level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Crate%5C%3A)
to re-merge all `use` statements matching Bevy's previous styling.
- Manually fixed cases where the `fmt` tool could not re-merge `use`
statements due to conditional compilation attributes.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally
## Migration Guide
The MSRV is now 1.81. Please update to this version or higher.
## Notes
- This is a _massive_ change to try and push through, which is why I've
outlined the semi-automatic steps I used to create this PR, in case this
fails and someone else tries again in the future.
- Making this change has no impact on user code, but does mean Bevy
contributors will be warned to use `core` and `alloc` instead of `std`
where possible.
- This lint is a critical first step towards investigating `no_std`
options for Bevy.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
