# Objective
There is a lot of `world.entities().len()`, especially in tests. In
tests, usually, the assumption is made that empty worlds do not contain
any entities. This is about to change (#19711), and as such all of these
tests are failing for that PR.
## Solution
`num_entities` is a convenience method that returns the number of
entities inside a world. It can later be adapted to exclude 'unexpected'
entities, associated with internal data structures such as Resources,
Queries, Systems. In general I argue for a separation of concepts where
`World` ignores internal entities in methods such as `iter_entities()`
and `clear_entities()`, that discussion is, however, separate from this
PR.
## Testing
I replaced most occurrences of `world.entities().len()` with
`world.num_entities()` and the tests passed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Some methods and commands carelessly overwrite `Relationship`
components. This may overwrite additional data stored at them which is
undesired.
Part of #19589
## Solution
A new private method will be used instead of insert:
`modify_or_insert_relation_with_relationship_hook_mode`.
This method behaves different to `insert` if `Relationship` is a larger
type than `Entity` and already contains this component. It will then use
the `modify_component` API and a new `Relationship::set_risky` method to
set the related entity, keeping all other data untouched.
For the `replace_related`(`_with_difference`) methods this also required
a `InsertHookMode` parameter for efficient modifications of multiple
children. The changes here are limited to the non-public methods.
I would appreciate feedback if this is all good.
# Testing
Added tests of all methods that previously could reset `Relationship`
data.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
I've noticed that some methods with `MaybeLocation::caller` don't have
`#[track_caller]` which resulted in wrong locations reported when
`track_location` is enabled.
## Solution
add `#[track_caller]` to them.
# Objective
Unblock #18162.
#15396 added the `'s` lifetime to `QueryData::Item` to make it possible
for query items to borrow from the state. The state isn't passed
directly to `QueryData::fetch()`, so it also added the `'s` lifetime to
`WorldQuery::Fetch` so that we can pass the borrows through there.
Unfortunately, having `WorldQuery::Fetch` borrow from the state makes it
impossible to have owned state, because we store the state and the
`Fetch` in the same `struct` during iteration.
## Solution
Undo the change to add the `'s` lifetime to `WorldQuery::Fetch`.
Instead, add a `&'s Self::State` parameter to `QueryData::fetch()` and
`QueryFilter::filter_fetch()` so that borrows from the state can be
passed directly to query items.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Emerson Coskey <emerson@coskey.dev>
# Objective
- Many strings in bevy_ecs are created but only used for debug: system
name, component name, ...
- Those strings make a significant part of the final binary and are no
use in a released game
## Solution
- Use [`strings`](https://linux.die.net/man/1/strings) to find ...
strings in a binary
- Try to find where they come from
- Many are made from `type_name::<T>()` and only used in error / debug
messages
- Add a new structure `DebugName` that holds no value if `debug` feature
is disabled
- Replace `core::any::type_name::<T>()` by `DebugName::type_name::<T>()`
## Testing
Measurements were taken without the new feature being enabled by
default, to help with commands
### File Size
I tried building the `breakout` example with `cargo run --release
--example breakout`
|`debug` enabled|`debug` disabled|
|-|-|
|81621776 B|77735728B|
|77.84MB|74.13MB|
### Compilation time
`hyperfine --min-runs 15 --prepare "cargo clean && sleep 5"
'RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout'
'RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout --features
debug'`
```
breakout' 'RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout --features debug'
Benchmark 1: RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout
Time (mean ± σ): 84.856 s ± 3.565 s [User: 1093.817 s, System: 32.547 s]
Range (min … max): 78.038 s … 89.214 s 15 runs
Benchmark 2: RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout --features debug
Time (mean ± σ): 92.303 s ± 2.466 s [User: 1193.443 s, System: 33.803 s]
Range (min … max): 90.619 s … 99.684 s 15 runs
Summary
RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout ran
1.09 ± 0.05 times faster than RUSTC_WRAPPER="" cargo build --release --example breakout --features debug
```
# Objective
Our strategy for storing observers is made up of several moving parts,
which are ultimately fairly simple nested HashMaps.
These types are currently `pub`, but lack any meaningful way to access
this data.
We have three options here:
1. Make these internals not `pub` at all.
2. Make the data read-only accessible.
3. Make the data mutably accessible.
## Solution
I've opted for option 2, exposing read-only values. This is consistent
with our existing approach to the ECS internals, allowing for easier
debugging without risking wanton data corruption. If one day you would
like to mutably access this data, please open an issue clearly
explaining what you're trying to do.
This was a pretty mechanical change, exposing fields via getters. I've
also opted to do my best to clarify some field names and documentation:
please double-check those for correctness. It was hard to be fully
confident, as the field names and documentation was not very clear ;)
## Testing
I spent some time going through the code paths, making sure that users
can trace all the way from `World` to the leaf nodes. Reviewers, please
ensure the same!
## Notes for reviewers
This is part of a broader observer overhaul: I fully expect us to change
up these internals and break these shiny new APIs. Probably even within
the same cycle!
But clean up your work area first: this sort of read-only getter and
improved docs will be important to replace as we work.
# Objective
Improve the performance of `FilteredEntity(Ref|Mut)` and
`Entity(Ref|Mut)Except`.
`FilteredEntityRef` needs an `Access<ComponentId>` to determine what
components it can access. There is one stored in the query state, but
query items cannot borrow from the state, so it has to `clone()` the
access for each row. Cloning the access involves memory allocations and
can be expensive.
## Solution
Let query items borrow from their query state.
Add an `'s` lifetime to `WorldQuery::Item` and `WorldQuery::Fetch`,
similar to the one in `SystemParam`, and provide `&'s Self::State` to
the fetch so that it can borrow from the state.
Unfortunately, there are a few cases where we currently return query
items from temporary query states: the sorted iteration methods create a
temporary state to query the sort keys, and the
`EntityRef::components<Q>()` methods create a temporary state for their
query.
To allow these to continue to work with most `QueryData`
implementations, introduce a new subtrait `ReleaseStateQueryData` that
converts a `QueryItem<'w, 's>` to `QueryItem<'w, 'static>`, and is
implemented for everything except `FilteredEntity(Ref|Mut)` and
`Entity(Ref|Mut)Except`.
`#[derive(QueryData)]` will generate `ReleaseStateQueryData`
implementations that apply when all of the subqueries implement
`ReleaseStateQueryData`.
This PR does not actually change the implementation of
`FilteredEntity(Ref|Mut)` or `Entity(Ref|Mut)Except`! That will be done
as a follow-up PR so that the changes are easier to review. I have
pushed the changes as chescock/bevy#5.
## Testing
I ran performance traces of many_foxes, both against main and against
chescock/bevy#5, both including #15282. These changes do appear to make
generalized animation a bit faster:
(Red is main, yellow is chescock/bevy#5)
## Migration Guide
The `WorldQuery::Item` and `WorldQuery::Fetch` associated types and the
`QueryItem` and `ROQueryItem` type aliases now have an additional
lifetime parameter corresponding to the `'s` lifetime in `Query`. Manual
implementations of `WorldQuery` will need to update the method
signatures to include the new lifetimes. Other uses of the types will
need to be updated to include a lifetime parameter, although it can
usually be passed as `'_`. In particular, `ROQueryItem` is used when
implementing `RenderCommand`.
Before:
```rust
fn render<'w>(
item: &P,
view: ROQueryItem<'w, Self::ViewQuery>,
entity: Option<ROQueryItem<'w, Self::ItemQuery>>,
param: SystemParamItem<'w, '_, Self::Param>,
pass: &mut TrackedRenderPass<'w>,
) -> RenderCommandResult;
```
After:
```rust
fn render<'w>(
item: &P,
view: ROQueryItem<'w, '_, Self::ViewQuery>,
entity: Option<ROQueryItem<'w, '_, Self::ItemQuery>>,
param: SystemParamItem<'w, '_, Self::Param>,
pass: &mut TrackedRenderPass<'w>,
) -> RenderCommandResult;
```
---
Methods on `QueryState` that take `&mut self` may now result in
conflicting borrows if the query items capture the lifetime of the
mutable reference. This affects `get()`, `iter()`, and others. To fix
the errors, first call `QueryState::update_archetypes()`, and then
replace a call `state.foo(world, param)` with
`state.query_manual(world).foo_inner(param)`. Alternately, you may be
able to restructure the code to call `state.query(world)` once and then
make multiple calls using the `Query`.
Before:
```rust
let mut state: QueryState<_, _> = ...;
let d1 = state.get(world, e1);
let d2 = state.get(world, e2); // Error: cannot borrow `state` as mutable more than once at a time
println!("{d1:?}");
println!("{d2:?}");
```
After:
```rust
let mut state: QueryState<_, _> = ...;
state.update_archetypes(world);
let d1 = state.get_manual(world, e1);
let d2 = state.get_manual(world, e2);
// OR
state.update_archetypes(world);
let d1 = state.query(world).get_inner(e1);
let d2 = state.query(world).get_inner(e2);
// OR
let query = state.query(world);
let d1 = query.get_inner(e1);
let d1 = query.get_inner(e2);
println!("{d1:?}");
println!("{d2:?}");
```
# Objective
Getting access to the original target of an entity-event is really
helpful when working with bubbled / propagated events.
`bevy_picking` special-cases this, but users have requested this for all
sorts of bubbled events.
The existing naming convention was also very confusing. Fixes
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/17112, but also see #18982.
## Solution
1. Rename `ObserverTrigger::target` -> `current_target`.
1. Store `original_target: Option<Entity>` in `ObserverTrigger`.
1. Wire it up so this field gets set correctly.
1. Remove the `target` field on the `Pointer` events from
`bevy_picking`.
Closes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/18710, which attempted
the same thing. Thanks @emfax!
## Testing
I've modified an existing test to check that the entities returned
during event bubbling / propagation are correct.
## Notes to reviewers
It's a little weird / sad that you can no longer access this infromation
via the buffered events for `Pointer`. That said, you already couldn't
access any bubbled target. We should probably remove the `BufferedEvent`
form of `Pointer` to reduce confusion and overhead, but I didn't want to
do so here.
Observer events can be trivially converted into buffered events (write
an observer with an EventWriter), and I suspect that that is the better
migration if you want the controllable timing or performance
characteristics of buffered events for your specific use case.
## Future work
It would be nice to not store this data at all (and not expose any
methods) if propagation was disabled. That involves more trait
shuffling, and I don't think we should do it here for reviewability.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joona Aalto <jondolf.dev@gmail.com>
# Objective
Closes#19564.
The current `Event` trait looks like this:
```rust
pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static {
type Traversal: Traversal<Self>;
const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false;
fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... }
fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... }
}
```
The `Event` trait is used by both buffered events
(`EventReader`/`EventWriter`) and observer events. If they are observer
events, they can optionally be targeted at specific `Entity`s or
`ComponentId`s, and can even be propagated to other entities.
However, there has long been a desire to split the trait semantically
for a variety of reasons, see #14843, #14272, and #16031 for discussion.
Some reasons include:
- It's very uncommon to use a single event type as both a buffered event
and targeted observer event. They are used differently and tend to have
distinct semantics.
- A common footgun is using buffered events with observers or event
readers with observer events, as there is no type-level error that
prevents this kind of misuse.
- #19440 made `Trigger::target` return an `Option<Entity>`. This
*seriously* hurts ergonomics for the general case of entity observers,
as you need to `.unwrap()` each time. If we could statically determine
whether the event is expected to have an entity target, this would be
unnecessary.
There's really two main ways that we can categorize events: push vs.
pull (i.e. "observer event" vs. "buffered event") and global vs.
targeted:
| | Push | Pull |
| ------------ | --------------- | --------------------------- |
| **Global** | Global observer | `EventReader`/`EventWriter` |
| **Targeted** | Entity observer | - |
There are many ways to approach this, each with their tradeoffs.
Ultimately, we kind of want to split events both ways:
- A type-level distinction between observer events and buffered events,
to prevent people from using the wrong kind of event in APIs
- A statically designated entity target for observer events to avoid
accidentally using untargeted events for targeted APIs
This PR achieves these goals by splitting event traits into `Event`,
`EntityEvent`, and `BufferedEvent`, with `Event` being the shared trait
implemented by all events.
## `Event`, `EntityEvent`, and `BufferedEvent`
`Event` is now a very simple trait shared by all events.
```rust
pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static {
// Required for observer APIs
fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... }
fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... }
}
```
You can call `trigger` for *any* event, and use a global observer for
listening to the event.
```rust
#[derive(Event)]
struct Speak {
message: String,
}
// ...
app.add_observer(|trigger: On<Speak>| {
println!("{}", trigger.message);
});
// ...
commands.trigger(Speak {
message: "Y'all like these reworked events?".to_string(),
});
```
To allow an event to be targeted at entities and even propagated
further, you can additionally implement the `EntityEvent` trait:
```rust
pub trait EntityEvent: Event {
type Traversal: Traversal<Self>;
const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false;
}
```
This lets you call `trigger_targets`, and to use targeted observer APIs
like `EntityCommands::observe`:
```rust
#[derive(Event, EntityEvent)]
#[entity_event(traversal = &'static ChildOf, auto_propagate)]
struct Damage {
amount: f32,
}
// ...
let enemy = commands.spawn((Enemy, Health(100.0))).id();
// Spawn some armor as a child of the enemy entity.
// When the armor takes damage, it will bubble the event up to the enemy.
let armor_piece = commands
.spawn((ArmorPiece, Health(25.0), ChildOf(enemy)))
.observe(|trigger: On<Damage>, mut query: Query<&mut Health>| {
// Note: `On::target` only exists because this is an `EntityEvent`.
let mut health = query.get(trigger.target()).unwrap();
health.0 -= trigger.amount();
});
commands.trigger_targets(Damage { amount: 10.0 }, armor_piece);
```
> [!NOTE]
> You *can* still also trigger an `EntityEvent` without targets using
`trigger`. We probably *could* make this an either-or thing, but I'm not
sure that's actually desirable.
To allow an event to be used with the buffered API, you can implement
`BufferedEvent`:
```rust
pub trait BufferedEvent: Event {}
```
The event can then be used with `EventReader`/`EventWriter`:
```rust
#[derive(Event, BufferedEvent)]
struct Message(String);
fn write_hello(mut writer: EventWriter<Message>) {
writer.write(Message("I hope these examples are alright".to_string()));
}
fn read_messages(mut reader: EventReader<Message>) {
// Process all buffered events of type `Message`.
for Message(message) in reader.read() {
println!("{message}");
}
}
```
In summary:
- Need a basic event you can trigger and observe? Derive `Event`!
- Need the event to be targeted at an entity? Derive `EntityEvent`!
- Need the event to be buffered and support the
`EventReader`/`EventWriter` API? Derive `BufferedEvent`!
## Alternatives
I'll now cover some of the alternative approaches I have considered and
briefly explored. I made this section collapsible since it ended up
being quite long :P
<details>
<summary>Expand this to see alternatives</summary>
### 1. Unified `Event` Trait
One option is not to have *three* separate traits (`Event`,
`EntityEvent`, `BufferedEvent`), and to instead just use associated
constants on `Event` to determine whether an event supports targeting
and buffering or not:
```rust
pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static {
type Traversal: Traversal<Self>;
const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false;
const TARGETED: bool = false;
const BUFFERED: bool = false;
fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... }
fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... }
}
```
Methods can then use bounds like `where E: Event<TARGETED = true>` or
`where E: Event<BUFFERED = true>` to limit APIs to specific kinds of
events.
This would keep everything under one `Event` trait, but I don't think
it's necessarily a good idea. It makes APIs harder to read, and docs
can't easily refer to specific types of events. You can also create
weird invariants: what if you specify `TARGETED = false`, but have
`Traversal` and/or `AUTO_PROPAGATE` enabled?
### 2. `Event` and `Trigger`
Another option is to only split the traits between buffered events and
observer events, since that is the main thing people have been asking
for, and they have the largest API difference.
If we did this, I think we would need to make the terms *clearly*
separate. We can't really use `Event` and `BufferedEvent` as the names,
since it would be strange that `BufferedEvent` doesn't implement
`Event`. Something like `ObserverEvent` and `BufferedEvent` could work,
but it'd be more verbose.
For this approach, I would instead keep `Event` for the current
`EventReader`/`EventWriter` API, and call the observer event a
`Trigger`, since the "trigger" terminology is already used in the
observer context within Bevy (both as a noun and a verb). This is also
what a long [bikeshed on
Discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1298057661878898791)
seemed to land on at the end of last year.
```rust
// For `EventReader`/`EventWriter`
pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static {}
// For observers
pub trait Trigger: Send + Sync + 'static {
type Traversal: Traversal<Self>;
const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false;
const TARGETED: bool = false;
fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... }
fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... }
}
```
The problem is that "event" is just a really good term for something
that "happens". Observers are rapidly becoming the more prominent API,
so it'd be weird to give them the `Trigger` name and leave the good
`Event` name for the less common API.
So, even though a split like this seems neat on the surface, I think it
ultimately wouldn't really work. We want to keep the `Event` name for
observer events, and there is no good alternative for the buffered
variant. (`Message` was suggested, but saying stuff like "sends a
collision message" is weird.)
### 3. `GlobalEvent` + `TargetedEvent`
What if instead of focusing on the buffered vs. observed split, we
*only* make a distinction between global and targeted events?
```rust
// A shared event trait to allow global observers to work
pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static {
fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... }
fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... }
}
// For buffered events and non-targeted observer events
pub trait GlobalEvent: Event {}
// For targeted observer events
pub trait TargetedEvent: Event {
type Traversal: Traversal<Self>;
const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false;
}
```
This is actually the first approach I implemented, and it has the neat
characteristic that you can only use non-targeted APIs like `trigger`
with a `GlobalEvent` and targeted APIs like `trigger_targets` with a
`TargetedEvent`. You have full control over whether the entity should or
should not have a target, as they are fully distinct at the type-level.
However, there's a few problems:
- There is no type-level indication of whether a `GlobalEvent` supports
buffered events or just non-targeted observer events
- An `Event` on its own does literally nothing, it's just a shared trait
required to make global observers accept both non-targeted and targeted
events
- If an event is both a `GlobalEvent` and `TargetedEvent`, global
observers again have ambiguity on whether an event has a target or not,
undermining some of the benefits
- The names are not ideal
### 4. `Event` and `EntityEvent`
We can fix some of the problems of Alternative 3 by accepting that
targeted events can also be used in non-targeted contexts, and simply
having the `Event` and `EntityEvent` traits:
```rust
// For buffered events and non-targeted observer events
pub trait Event: Send + Sync + 'static {
fn register_component_id(world: &mut World) -> ComponentId { ... }
fn component_id(world: &World) -> Option<ComponentId> { ... }
}
// For targeted observer events
pub trait EntityEvent: Event {
type Traversal: Traversal<Self>;
const AUTO_PROPAGATE: bool = false;
}
```
This is essentially identical to this PR, just without a dedicated
`BufferedEvent`. The remaining major "problem" is that there is still
zero type-level indication of whether an `Event` event *actually*
supports the buffered API. This leads us to the solution proposed in
this PR, using `Event`, `EntityEvent`, and `BufferedEvent`.
</details>
## Conclusion
The `Event` + `EntityEvent` + `BufferedEvent` split proposed in this PR
aims to solve all the common problems with Bevy's current event model
while keeping the "weirdness" factor minimal. It splits in terms of both
the push vs. pull *and* global vs. targeted aspects, while maintaining a
shared concept for an "event".
### Why I Like This
- The term "event" remains as a single concept for all the different
kinds of events in Bevy.
- Despite all event types being "events", they use fundamentally
different APIs. Instead of assuming that you can use an event type with
any pattern (when only one is typically supported), you explicitly opt
in to each one with dedicated traits.
- Using separate traits for each type of event helps with documentation
and clearer function signatures.
- I can safely make assumptions on expected usage.
- If I see that an event is an `EntityEvent`, I can assume that I can
use `observe` on it and get targeted events.
- If I see that an event is a `BufferedEvent`, I can assume that I can
use `EventReader` to read events.
- If I see both `EntityEvent` and `BufferedEvent`, I can assume that
both APIs are supported.
In summary: This allows for a unified concept for events, while limiting
the different ways to use them with opt-in traits. No more guess-work
involved when using APIs.
### Problems?
- Because `BufferedEvent` implements `Event` (for more consistent
semantics etc.), you can still use all buffered events for non-targeted
observers. I think this is fine/good. The important part is that if you
see that an event implements `BufferedEvent`, you know that the
`EventReader`/`EventWriter` API should be supported. Whether it *also*
supports other APIs is secondary.
- I currently only support `trigger_targets` for an `EntityEvent`.
However, you can technically target components too, without targeting
any entities. I consider that such a niche and advanced use case that
it's not a huge problem to only support it for `EntityEvent`s, but we
could also split `trigger_targets` into `trigger_entities` and
`trigger_components` if we wanted to (or implement components as
entities :P).
- You can still trigger an `EntityEvent` *without* targets. I consider
this correct, since `Event` implements the non-targeted behavior, and
it'd be weird if implementing another trait *removed* behavior. However,
it does mean that global observers for entity events can technically
return `Entity::PLACEHOLDER` again (since I got rid of the
`Option<Entity>` added in #19440 for ergonomics). I think that's enough
of an edge case that it's not a huge problem, but it is worth keeping in
mind.
- ~~Deriving both `EntityEvent` and `BufferedEvent` for the same type
currently duplicates the `Event` implementation, so you instead need to
manually implement one of them.~~ Changed to always requiring `Event` to
be derived.
## Related Work
There are plans to implement multi-event support for observers,
especially for UI contexts. [Cart's
example](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14649#issuecomment-2960402508)
API looked like this:
```rust
// Truncated for brevity
trigger: Trigger<(
OnAdd<Pressed>,
OnRemove<Pressed>,
OnAdd<InteractionDisabled>,
OnRemove<InteractionDisabled>,
OnInsert<Hovered>,
)>,
```
I believe this shouldn't be in conflict with this PR. If anything, this
PR might *help* achieve the multi-event pattern for entity observers
with fewer footguns: by statically enforcing that all of these events
are `EntityEvent`s in the context of `EntityCommands::observe`, we can
avoid misuse or weird cases where *some* events inside the trigger are
targeted while others are not.
Follow-up of #19274.
Make the `check_change_tick` methods, of which some are now public, take
`CheckChangeTicks` to make it obvious where this tick comes from, see
other PR.
This also affects the `System` trait, hence the many changed files.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Reduce memory usage by storing fewer copies of
`FilteredAccessSet<ComponentId>`.
Currently, the `System` trait exposes the `component_access_set` for the
system, which is used by the multi-threaded executor to determine which
systems can run concurrently. But because it is available on the trait,
it needs to be stored for *every* system, even ones that are not run by
the executor! In particular, it is never needed for observers, or for
the inner systems in a `PipeSystem` or `CombinatorSystem`.
## Solution
Instead of exposing the access from a method on `System`, return it from
`System::initialize`. Since it is still needed during scheduling, store
the access alongside the boxed system in the schedule.
That's not quite enough for systems built using `SystemParamBuilder`s,
though. Those calculate the access in `SystemParamBuilder::build`, which
happens earlier than `System::initialize`. To handle those, we separate
`SystemParam::init_state` into `init_state`, which creates the state
value, and `init_access`, which calculates the access. This lets
`System::initialize` call `init_access` on a state that was provided by
the builder.
An additional benefit of that separation is that it removes the need to
duplicate access checks between `SystemParamBuilder::build` and
`SystemParam::init_state`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Currently, the observer API looks like this:
```rust
app.add_observer(|trigger: Trigger<Explode>| {
info!("Entity {} exploded!", trigger.target());
});
```
Future plans for observers also include "multi-event observers" with a
trigger that looks like this (see [Cart's
example](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14649#issuecomment-2960402508)):
```rust
trigger: Trigger<(
OnAdd<Pressed>,
OnRemove<Pressed>,
OnAdd<InteractionDisabled>,
OnRemove<InteractionDisabled>,
OnInsert<Hovered>,
)>,
```
In scenarios like this, there is a lot of repetition of `On`. These are
expected to be very high-traffic APIs especially in UI contexts, so
ergonomics and readability are critical.
By renaming `Trigger` to `On`, we can make these APIs read more cleanly
and get rid of the repetition:
```rust
app.add_observer(|trigger: On<Explode>| {
info!("Entity {} exploded!", trigger.target());
});
```
```rust
trigger: On<(
Add<Pressed>,
Remove<Pressed>,
Add<InteractionDisabled>,
Remove<InteractionDisabled>,
Insert<Hovered>,
)>,
```
Names like `On<Add<Pressed>>` emphasize the actual event listener nature
more than `Trigger<OnAdd<Pressed>>`, and look cleaner. This *also* frees
up the `Trigger` name if we want to use it for the observer event type,
splitting them out from buffered events (bikeshedding this is out of
scope for this PR though).
For prior art:
[`bevy_eventlistener`](https://github.com/aevyrie/bevy_eventlistener)
used
[`On`](https://docs.rs/bevy_eventlistener/latest/bevy_eventlistener/event_listener/struct.On.html)
for its event listener type. Though in our case, the observer is the
event listener, and `On` is just a type containing information about the
triggered event.
## Solution
Steal from `bevy_event_listener` by @aevyrie and use `On`.
- Rename `Trigger` to `On`
- Rename `OnAdd` to `Add`
- Rename `OnInsert` to `Insert`
- Rename `OnReplace` to `Replace`
- Rename `OnRemove` to `Remove`
- Rename `OnDespawn` to `Despawn`
## Discussion
### Naming Conflicts??
Using a name like `Add` might initially feel like a very bad idea, since
it risks conflict with `core::ops::Add`. However, I don't expect this to
be a big problem in practice.
- You rarely need to actually implement the `Add` trait, especially in
modules that would use the Bevy ECS.
- In the rare cases where you *do* get a conflict, it is very easy to
fix by just disambiguating, for example using `ops::Add`.
- The `Add` event is a struct while the `Add` trait is a trait (duh), so
the compiler error should be very obvious.
For the record, renaming `OnAdd` to `Add`, I got exactly *zero* errors
or conflicts within Bevy itself. But this is of course not entirely
representative of actual projects *using* Bevy.
You might then wonder, why not use `Added`? This would conflict with the
`Added` query filter, so it wouldn't work. Additionally, the current
naming convention for observer events does not use past tense.
### Documentation
This does make documentation slightly more awkward when referring to
`On` or its methods. Previous docs often referred to `Trigger::target`
or "sends a `Trigger`" (which is... a bit strange anyway), which would
now be `On::target` and "sends an observer `Event`".
You can see the diff in this PR to see some of the effects. I think it
should be fine though, we may just need to reword more documentation to
read better.
# Objective
As discussed in #19285, some of our names conflict. `Entry` in bevy_ecs
is one of those overly general names.
## Solution
Rename this type (and the related types) to `ComponentEntry`.
---------
Co-authored-by: urben1680 <55257931+urben1680@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
I set out with one simple goal: clearly document the differences between
each of the component lifecycle events via module docs.
Unfortunately, no such module existed: the various lifecycle code was
scattered to the wind.
Without a unified module, it's very hard to discover the related types,
and there's nowhere good to put my shiny new documentation.
## Solution
1. Unify the assorted types into a single
`bevy_ecs::component_lifecycle` module.
2. Write docs.
3. Write a migration guide.
## Testing
Thanks CI!
## Follow-up
1. The lifecycle event names are pretty confusing, especially
`OnReplace`. We should consider renaming those. No bikeshedding in my PR
though!
2. Observers need real module docs too :(
3. Any additional functional changes should be done elsewhere; this is a
simple docs and re-org PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: theotherphil <phil.j.ellison@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Cleanup related to #19495.
## Solution
- Delete `System::component_access()`. It is redundant with
`System::component_access_set().combined_access()`.
## Testing
- None. There are no callers of this function.
# Objective
In the past I had custom data structures containing `Tick`s. I learned
that these need to be regularly checked to clamp them. But there was no
way to hook into that logic so I abandoned storing ticks since then.
Another motivation to open this up some more is to be more able to do a
correct implementation of `System::check_ticks`.
## Solution
Add `CheckChangeTicks` and trigger it in `World::check_change_ticks`.
Make `Tick::check_tick` public.
This event makes it possible to store ticks in components or resources
and have them checked.
I also made `Schedules::check_change_ticks` public so users can store
schedules in custom resources/components for whatever reasons.
## Testing
The logic boils down to a single `World::trigger` call and I don't think
this needs more tests.
## Alternatives
Making this obsolete like with #15683.
---
## Showcase
From the added docs:
```rs
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
use bevy_ecs::component::CheckChangeTicks;
#[derive(Resource)]
struct CustomSchedule(Schedule);
let mut world = World::new();
world.add_observer(|tick: Trigger<CheckChangeTicks>, mut schedule: ResMut<CustomSchedule>| {
schedule.0.check_change_ticks(tick.get());
});
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
`Entity::PLACEHOLDER` acts as a magic number that will *probably* never
really exist, but it certainly could. And, `Entity` has a niche, so the
only reason to use `PLACEHOLDER` is as an alternative to `MaybeUninit`
that trades safety risks for logic risks.
As a result, bevy has generally advised against using `PLACEHOLDER`, but
we still use if for a lot internally. This pr starts removing internal
uses of it, starting from observers.
## Solution
Change all trigger target related types from `Entity` to
`Option<Entity>`
Small migration guide to come.
## Testing
CI
## Future Work
This turned a lot of code from
```rust
trigger.target()
```
to
```rust
trigger.target().unwrap()
```
The extra panic is no worse than before; it's just earlier than
panicking after passing the placeholder to something else.
But this is kinda annoying.
I would like to add a `TriggerMode` or something to `Event` that would
restrict what kinds of targets can be used for that event. Many events
like `Removed` etc, are always triggered with a target. We can make
those have a way to assume Some, etc. But I wanted to save that for a
future pr.
# Objective
- Partial fix#19504
- As more features were added to Bevy ECS, certain core hot-path
function calls exceeded LLVM's automatic inlining threshold, leading to
significant performance regressions in some cases.
## Solution
- inline more functions.
## Performance
This brought nearly 3x improvement in Windows bench (using Sander's
testing code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- #19504 showed a 11x regression in getting component values for
unregistered components. This pr should fix that and improve others a
little too.
- This is some cleanup work from #18173 .
## Solution
- Whenever we expect a component value to exist, we only care about
fully registered components, not queued to be registered components
since, for the value to exist, it must be registered.
- So we can use the faster `get_valid_*` instead of `get_*` in a lot of
places.
- Also found a bug where `valid_*` did not forward to `get_valid_*`
properly. That's fixed.
## Testing
CI
# Objective
This is the first step of #19430 and is a follow up for #19132.
Now that `ArchetypeRow` has a niche, we can use `Option` instead of
needing `INVALID` everywhere.
This was especially concerning since `INVALID` *really was valid!*
Using options here made the code clearer and more data-driven.
## Solution
Replace all uses of `INVALID` entity locations (and archetype/table
rows) with `None`.
## Testing
CI
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
There are several uninlined format args (seems to be in more formatting
macros and in more crates) that are not detected on stable, but are on
nightly.
## Solution
Fix them.
# Objective
#19047 added an `MaybeUninit` field to `EntityMeta`, but did not
guarantee that it will be initialized before access:
```rust
let mut world = World::new();
let id = world.entities().reserve_entity();
world.flush();
world.entity(id);
```
<details>
<summary>Miri Error</summary>
```
error: Undefined Behavior: using uninitialized data, but this operation requires initialized memory
--> /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/entity/mod.rs:1121:26
|
1121 | unsafe { meta.spawned_or_despawned.assume_init() }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ using uninitialized data, but this operation requires initialized memory
|
= help: this indicates a bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, and caused Undefined Behavior
= help: see https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html for further information
= note: BACKTRACE:
= note: inside closure at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/entity/mod.rs:1121:26: 1121:65
= note: inside `std::option::Option::<&bevy_ecs::entity::EntityMeta>::map::<bevy_ecs::entity::SpawnedOrDespawned, {closure@bevy_ecs::entity::Entities::entity_get_spawned_or_despawned::{closure#1}}>` at /home/vj/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/option.rs:1144:29: 1144:33
= note: inside `bevy_ecs::entity::Entities::entity_get_spawned_or_despawned` at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/entity/mod.rs:1112:9: 1122:15
= note: inside closure at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/entity/mod.rs:1094:13: 1094:57
= note: inside `bevy_ecs::change_detection::MaybeLocation::<std::option::Option<&std::panic::Location<'_>>>::new_with_flattened::<{closure@bevy_ecs::entity::Entities::entity_get_spawned_or_despawned_by::{closure#0}}>` at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/change_detection.rs:1371:20: 1371:24
= note: inside `bevy_ecs::entity::Entities::entity_get_spawned_or_despawned_by` at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/entity/mod.rs:1093:9: 1096:11
= note: inside `bevy_ecs::entity::Entities::entity_does_not_exist_error_details` at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/entity/mod.rs:1163:23: 1163:70
= note: inside `bevy_ecs::entity::EntityDoesNotExistError::new` at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/entity/mod.rs:1182:22: 1182:74
= note: inside `bevy_ecs::world::unsafe_world_cell::UnsafeWorldCell::<'_>::get_entity` at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/world/unsafe_world_cell.rs:368:20: 368:73
= note: inside `<bevy_ecs::entity::Entity as bevy_ecs::world::WorldEntityFetch>::fetch_ref` at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/world/entity_fetch.rs:207:21: 207:42
= note: inside `bevy_ecs::world::World::get_entity::<bevy_ecs::entity::Entity>` at /home/vj/workspace/rust/bevy/crates/bevy_ecs/src/world/mod.rs:911:18: 911:42
note: inside `main`
--> src/main.rs:12:15
|
12 | world.entity(id);
|
```
</details>
## Solution
- remove the existing `MaybeUninit` in `EntityMeta.spawned_or_despawned`
- initialize during flush. This is not needed for soundness, but not
doing this means we can't return a sensible location/tick for flushed
entities.
## Testing
Test via the snippet above (also added equivalent test).
---------
Co-authored-by: urben1680 <55257931+urben1680@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Remove `ArchetypeComponentId` and `archetype_component_access`.
Following #16885, they are no longer used by the engine, so we can stop
spending time calculating them or space storing them.
## Solution
Remove `ArchetypeComponentId` and everything that touches it.
The `System::update_archetype_component_access` method no longer needs
to update `archetype_component_access`. We do still need to update query
caches, but we no longer need to do so *before* running the system. We'd
have to touch every caller anyway if we gave the method a better name,
so just remove `System::update_archetype_component_access` and
`SystemParam::new_archetype` entirely, and update the query cache in
`Query::get_param`.
The `Single` and `Populated` params also need their query caches updated
in `SystemParam::validate_param`, so change `validate_param` to take
`&mut Self::State` instead of `&Self::State`.
# Objective
Since #18704 is done, we can track the length of unique entity row
collections with only a `u32` and identify an index within that
collection with only a `NonMaxU32`. This leaves an opportunity for
performance improvements.
## Solution
- Use `EntityRow` in sparse sets.
- Change table, entity, and query lengths to be `u32` instead of
`usize`.
- Keep `batching` module `usize` based since that is reused for events,
which may exceed `u32::MAX`.
- Change according `Range<usize>` to `Range<u32>`. This is more
efficient and helps justify safety.
- Change `ArchetypeRow` and `TableRow` to wrap `NonMaxU32` instead of
`u32`.
Justifying `NonMaxU32::new_unchecked` everywhere is predicated on this
safety comment in `Entities::set`: "`location` must be valid for the
entity at `index` or immediately made valid afterwards before handing
control to unknown code." This ensures no entity is in two table rows
for example. That fact is used to argue uniqueness of the entity rows in
each table, archetype, sparse set, query, etc. So if there's no
duplicates, and a maximum total entities of `u32::MAX` none of the
corresponding row ids / indexes can exceed `NonMaxU32`.
## Testing
CI
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com>
## Objective
Add documentation useful to users of `bevy_ecs` not also using `App`.
Fixes#19270.
## Solution
* Add explanation of labels to `Schedule` documentation.
* Add example of `derive(ScheduleLabel)` to `trait ScheduleLabel`.
* Add a third example to `Schedule` which demonstrates using a schedule
via label instead of owning it directly.
* Add further explanation and links to `World::add_schedule()`, and
`World::run_schedule()`.
## Testing
Reviewed generated documentation.
Please review this documentation carefully for correctness, as I have
little experience with `bevy_ecs` and I am adding this information
because it would have helped my own past confusion, but I may still be
wrong about how things should be done.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: theotherphil <phil.j.ellison@gmail.com>
# Objective
[see original
comment](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/18801#issuecomment-2796981745)
> Alternately, could we store it on the World instead of a global? I
think we have a World nearby whenever we call default_error_handler().
That would avoid the need for atomics or locks, since we could do
ordinary reads and writes to the World.
Global error handlers don't actually need to be global – per world is
enough. This allows using different handlers for different worlds and
also removes the restrictions on changing the handler only once.
## Solution
Each `World` can now store its own error handler in a resource.
For convenience, you can also set the default error handler for an
`App`, which applies it to the worlds of all `SubApp`s. The old behavior
of only being able to set the error handler once is kept for apps.
We also don't need the `configurable_error_handler` feature anymore now.
## Testing
New/adjusted tests for failing schedule systems & observers.
---
## Showcase
```rust
App::new()
.set_error_handler(info)
…
```
# Objective
In my own project I was encountering the issue to find out which
entities were spawned after applying commands. I began maintaining a
vector of all entities with generational information before and after
applying the command and diffing it. This was awfully complicated though
and has no constant complexity but grows with the number of entities.
## Solution
Looking at `EntyMeta` it seemed obvious to me that struct can track the
tick just as it does with `MaybeLocation`, updated from the same call.
After that it became almost a given to also introduce query data
`SpawnDetails` which offers methods to get the spawn tick and location,
and query filter `Spawned` that filters entities out that were not
spawned since the last run.
## Testing
I expanded a few tests and added new ones, though maybe I forgot a group
of tests that should be extended too. I basically searched `bevy_ecs`
for mentions of `Changed` and `Added` to see where the tests and docs
are.
Benchmarks of spawn/despawn can be found
[here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/19047#issuecomment-2852181374).
---
## Showcase
From the added docs, systems with equal complexity since the filter is
not archetypal:
```rs
fn system1(q: Query<Entity, Spawned>) {
for entity in &q { /* entity spawned */ }
}
fn system2(query: Query<(Entity, SpawnDetails)>) {
for (entity, spawned) in &query {
if spawned.is_spawned() { /* entity spawned */ }
}
}
```
`SpawnedDetails` has a few more methods:
```rs
fn print_spawn_details(query: Query<(Entity, SpawnDetails)>) {
for (entity, spawn_details) in &query {
if spawn_details.is_spawned() {
print!("new ");
}
println!(
"entity {:?} spawned at {:?} by {:?}",
entity,
spawn_details.spawned_at(),
spawn_details.spawned_by()
);
}
}
```
## Changes
No public api was changed, I only added to it. That is why I added no
migration guide.
- query data `SpawnDetails`
- query filter `Spawned`
- method `Entities::entity_get_spawned_or_despawned_at`
- method `EntityRef::spawned_at`
- method `EntityMut::spawned_at`
- method `EntityWorldMut::spawned_at`
- method `UnsafeEntityCell::spawned_at`
- method `FilteredEntityRef::spawned_at`
- method `FilteredEntityMut::spawned_at`
- method `EntityRefExcept::spawned_at`
- method `EntityMutExcept::spawned_at`
---------
Co-authored-by: Eagster <79881080+ElliottjPierce@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes a subset of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/13735 by
making `EntityRef`, `EntityMut` + similar WorldQueries use the system's
change ticks when being created from within a system.
In particular, this means that `entity_ref.get_ref::<T>()` will use the
correct change ticks (the ones from the system), which matches the
behaviour of querying for `Ref<T>` directly in the system parameters.
## Solution
- Implements the solution described by
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/13735#issuecomment-2652482918
which is to add change ticks to the `UnsafeEntityCell`
## Testing
- Added a unit test that is close to what users would encounter: before
this PR the `Added`/`Changed` filters on `Ref`s created from `EntityRef`
are incorrect.
# Objective
A fair few items were deprecated in 0.16. Let's delete them now that
we're in the 0.17 development cycle!
## Solution
- Deleted items marked deprecated in 0.16.
## Testing
- CI
---
## Notes
I'm making the assumption that _everything_ deprecated in 0.16 should be
removed in 0.17. That may be a false assumption in certain cases. Please
check the items to be removed to see if there are any exceptions we
should keep around for another cycle!
# Objective
It has long been a todo item in the ecs to create a `BundleRemover`
alongside the inserter, spawner, etc.
This is an uncontroversial first step of #18514.
## Solution
Move existing code from complex helper functions to one generalized
`BundleRemover`.
## Testing
Existing tests.
# Objective
Let `FilteredEntityRef` and `FilteredEntityMut` receive access when
nested inside tuples or `#[derive(QueryData)]` types. Make sure to
exclude any access that would conflict with other subqueries!
Fixes#14349
## Solution
Replace `WorldQuery::set_access(state, access)` with a new method,
`QueryData::provide_extra_access(state, access, available_access)`, that
passes both the total available access and the currently used access.
This is called after `WorldQuery::update_component_access()`, so any
access used by ordinary subqueries will be known. `FilteredEntityRef`
and `FilteredEntityMut` can use the combination to determine how much
access they can safely take, while tuples can safely pass those
parameters directly to their subqueries.
This requires a new `Access::remove_conflicting_access()` method that
can be used to remove any access that would conflict with existing
access. Implementing this method was easier by first factoring some
common set manipulation code out of `Access::extend`. I can extract that
refactoring to a separate PR if desired.
Have `FilteredEntity(Ref|Mut)` store `Access` instead of
`FilteredAccess` because they do not need to keep track of the filter.
This was necessary in an early draft but no longer is. I left it in
because it's small and I'm touching that code anyway, but I can extract
it to a separate PR if desired.
# Objective
Based on and closes#18054, this PR builds on #18035 and #18147 to
remove:
- `Commands::insert_or_spawn_batch`
- `Entities::alloc_at_without_replacement`
- `Entities::alloc_at`
- `entity::AllocAtWithoutReplacement`
- `World::insert_or_spawn_batch`
- `World::insert_or_spawn_batch_with_caller`
## Testing
Just removing unused, deprecated code, so no new tests. Note that as of
writing, #18035 is still under testing and review.
## Future Work
Per
[this](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/18054#issuecomment-2689088899)
comment on #18054, there may be additional performance improvements
possible to the entity allocator now that `alloc_at` no longer is
supported. At a glance, I don't see anything obvious to improve, but it
may be worth further investigation in the future.
---------
Co-authored-by: JaySpruce <jsprucebruce@gmail.com>
# Objective
Prevent using exclusive systems as observers. Allowing them is unsound,
because observers are only expected to have `DeferredWorld` access, and
the observer infrastructure will keep pointers that are invalidated by
the creation of `&mut World`.
See
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/actions/runs/14778342801/job/41491517847?pr=19011
for a MIRI failure in a recent PR caused by an exclusive system being
used as an observer in a test.
## Solution
Have `Observer::new` panic if `System::is_exclusive()` is true. Document
that method, and methods that call it, as panicking.
(It should be possible to express this in the type system so that the
calls won't even compile, but I did not want to attempt that.)
## Testing
Added a unit test that calls `World::add_observer` with an exclusive
system.
# Objective
The goal of `bevy_platform_support` is to provide a set of platform
agnostic APIs, alongside platform-specific functionality. This is a high
traffic crate (providing things like HashMap and Instant). Especially in
light of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/18799, it
deserves a friendlier / shorter name.
Given that it hasn't had a full release yet, getting this change in
before Bevy 0.16 makes sense.
## Solution
- Rename `bevy_platform_support` to `bevy_platform`.
# Objective
- The `#[deprecated]` attributes supports a `since` field, which
documents in which version an item was deprecated. This field is visible
in `rustdoc`.
- We inconsistently use `since` throughout the project.
For an example of what `since` renders as, take a look at
`ChildOf::get()`:
```rust
/// The parent entity of this child entity.
#[deprecated(since = "0.16.0", note = "Use child_of.parent() instead")]
#[inline]
pub fn get(&self) -> Entity {
self.0
}
```
## Solution
- Add `since = "0.16.0"` to all `#[deprecated]` attributes that do not
already use it.
- Add an example of deprecating a struct with the `since` field in the
migration guide document.
I would appreciate if this could be included in 0.16's release, as its a
low-risk documentation improvement that is valuable for the release, but
I'd understand if this was cut.
## Testing
You can use `cargo doc` to inspect the rendered form of
`#[deprecated(since = "0.16.0", ...)]`.
# Objective
#18173 allows components to be queued without being fully registered.
But much of bevy's debug logging contained
`components.get_name(id).unwrap()`. However, this panics when the id is
queued. This PR fixes this, allowing names to be retrieved for debugging
purposes, etc, even while they're still queued.
## Solution
We change `ComponentInfo::descriptor` to be `Arc<ComponentDescriptor>`
instead of not arc'd. This lets us pass the descriptor around (as a name
or otherwise) as needed. The alternative would require some form of
`MappedRwLockReadGuard`, which is unstable, and would be terribly
blocking. Putting it in an arc also signifies that it doesn't change,
which is a nice signal to users. This does mean there's an extra pointer
dereference, but I don't think that's an issue here, as almost all paths
that use this are for debugging purposes or one-time set ups.
## Testing
Existing tests.
## Migration Guide
`Components::get_name` now returns `Option<Cow<'_, str>` instead of
`Option<&str>`. This is because it now returns results for queued
components. If that behavior is not desired, or you know the component
is not queued, you can use
`components.get_info().map(ComponentInfo::name)` instead.
Similarly, `ScheduleGraph::conflicts_to_string` now returns `impl
Iterator<Item = (String, String, Vec<Cow<str>>)>` instead of `impl
Iterator<Item = (String, String, Vec<&str>)>`. Because `Cow<str>` derefs
to `&str`, most use cases can remain unchanged.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Fixes#9367.
Yet another follow-up to #16547.
These traits were initially based on `Borrow<Entity>` because that trait
was what they were replacing, and it felt close enough in meaning.
However, they ultimately don't quite match: `borrow` always returns
references, whereas `EntityBorrow` always returns a plain `Entity`.
Additionally, `EntityBorrow` can imply that we are borrowing an `Entity`
from the ECS, which is not what it does.
Due to its safety contract, `TrustedEntityBorrow` is important an
important and widely used trait for `EntitySet` functionality.
In contrast, the safe `EntityBorrow` does not see much use, because even
outside of `EntitySet`-related functionality, it is a better idea to
accept `TrustedEntityBorrow` over `EntityBorrow`.
Furthermore, as #9367 points out, abstracting over returning `Entity`
from pointers/structs that contain it can skip some ergonomic friction.
On top of that, there are aspects of #18319 and #18408 that are relevant
to naming:
We've run into the issue that relying on a type default can switch
generic order. This is livable in some contexts, but unacceptable in
others.
To remedy that, we'd need to switch to a type alias approach:
The "defaulted" `Entity` case becomes a
`UniqueEntity*`/`Entity*Map`/`Entity*Set` alias, and the base type
receives a more general name. `TrustedEntityBorrow` does not mesh
clearly with sensible base type names.
## Solution
Replace any `EntityBorrow` bounds with `TrustedEntityBorrow`.
+
Rename them as such:
`EntityBorrow` -> `ContainsEntity`
`TrustedEntityBorrow` -> `EntityEquivalent`
For `EntityBorrow` we produce a change in meaning; We designate it for
types that aren't necessarily strict wrappers around `Entity` or some
pointer to `Entity`, but rather any of the myriad of types that contain
a single associated `Entity`.
This pattern can already be seen in the common `entity`/`id` methods
across the engine.
We do not mean for `ContainsEntity` to be a trait that abstracts input
API (like how `AsRef<T>` is often used, f.e.), because eliding
`entity()` would be too implicit in the general case.
We prefix "Contains" to match the intuition of a struct with an `Entity`
field, like some contain a `length` or `capacity`.
It gives the impression of structure, which avoids the implication of a
relationship to the `ECS`.
`HasEntity` f.e. could be interpreted as "a currently live entity",
As an input trait for APIs like #9367 envisioned, `TrustedEntityBorrow`
is a better fit, because it *does* restrict itself to strict wrappers
and pointers. Which is why we replace any
`EntityBorrow`/`ContainsEntity` bounds with
`TrustedEntityBorrow`/`EntityEquivalent`.
Here, the name `EntityEquivalent` is a lot closer to its actual meaning,
which is "A type that is both equivalent to an `Entity`, and forms the
same total order when compared".
Prior art for this is the
[`Equivalent`](https://docs.rs/hashbrown/latest/hashbrown/trait.Equivalent.html)
trait in `hashbrown`, which utilizes both `Borrow` and `Eq` for its one
blanket impl!
Given that we lose the `Borrow` moniker, and `Equivalent` can carry
various meanings, we expand on the safety comment of `EntityEquivalent`
somewhat. That should help prevent the confusion we saw in
[#18408](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/18408#issuecomment-2742094176).
The new name meshes a lot better with the type aliasing approach in
#18408, by aligning with the base name `EntityEquivalentHashMap`.
For a consistent scheme among all set types, we can use this scheme for
the `UniqueEntity*` wrapper types as well!
This allows us to undo the switched generic order that was introduced to
`UniqueEntityArray` by its `Entity` default.
Even without the type aliases, I think these renames are worth doing!
## Migration Guide
Any use of `EntityBorrow` becomes `ContainsEntity`.
Any use of `TrustedEntityBorrow` becomes `EntityEquivalent`.
# Objective
Unlike for their helper typers, the import paths for
`unique_array::UniqueEntityArray`, `unique_slice::UniqueEntitySlice`,
`unique_vec::UniqueEntityVec`, `hash_set::EntityHashSet`,
`hash_map::EntityHashMap`, `index_set::EntityIndexSet`,
`index_map::EntityIndexMap` are quite redundant.
When looking at the structure of `hashbrown`, we can also see that while
both `HashSet` and `HashMap` have their own modules, the main types
themselves are re-exported to the crate level.
## Solution
Re-export the types in their shared `entity` parent module, and simplify
the imports where they're used.
# Objective
Requires are currently more verbose than they need to be. People would
like to define inline component values. Additionally, the current
`#[require(Foo(custom_constructor))]` and `#[require(Foo(|| Foo(10))]`
syntax doesn't really make sense within the context of the Rust type
system. #18309 was an attempt to improve ergonomics for some cases, but
it came at the cost of even more weirdness / unintuitive behavior. Our
approach as a whole needs a rethink.
## Solution
Rework the `#[require()]` syntax to make more sense. This is a breaking
change, but I think it will make the system easier to learn, while also
improving ergonomics substantially:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(
A, // this will use A::default()
B(1), // inline tuple-struct value
C { value: 1 }, // inline named-struct value
D::Variant, // inline enum variant
E::SOME_CONST, // inline associated const
F::new(1), // inline constructor
G = returns_g(), // an expression that returns G
H = SomethingElse::new(), // expression returns SomethingElse, where SomethingElse: Into<H>
)]
struct Foo;
```
## Migration Guide
Custom-constructor requires should use the new expression-style syntax:
```rust
// before
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(A(returns_a))]
struct Foo;
// after
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(A = returns_a())]
struct Foo;
```
Inline-closure-constructor requires should use the inline value syntax
where possible:
```rust
// before
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(A(|| A(10))]
struct Foo;
// after
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(A(10)]
struct Foo;
```
In cases where that is not possible, use the expression-style syntax:
```rust
// before
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(A(|| A(10))]
struct Foo;
// after
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(A = A(10)]
struct Foo;
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#16861
## Solution
- Added:
- `UnsafeEntityCell::get_mut_assume_mutable_by_id`
- `EntityMut::get_mut_assume_mutable_by_id`
- `EntityMut::get_mut_assume_mutable_by_id_unchecked`
- `EntityWorldMut::into_mut_assume_mutable_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::into_mut_assume_mutable`
- `EntityWorldMut::get_mut_assume_mutable_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::into_mut_assume_mutable_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::modify_component_by_id`
- `World::modify_component_by_id`
- `DeferredWorld::modify_component_by_id`
- Added `fetch_mut_assume_mutable` to `DynamicComponentFetch` trait
(this is a breaking change)
## Testing
- CI
---
## Migration Guide
If you had previously implemented `DynamicComponentFetch` you must now
include a definition for `fetch_mut_assume_mutable`. In general this
will be identical to `fetch_mut` using the relevant alternatives for
actually getting a component.
---
## Notes
All of the added methods are minor variations on existing functions and
should therefore be of low risk for inclusion during the RC process.
# Objective
fixes#18452.
## Solution
Spawning used to flush commands only, but those commands can reserve
entities. Now, spawning flushes everything, including reserved entities.
I checked, and this was the only place where `flush_commands` is used
instead of `flush` by mistake.
## Testing
I simplified the MRE from #18452 into its own test, which fails on main,
but passes on this branch.
# Objective
I was looking over a PR yesterday, and got confused by the docs on
deferred world. I thought I would add a little more detail to the struct
in order to clarify it a little.
## Solution
Document some more about deferred worlds.
# Objective
Fixes#18357
## Solution
Generalize `RelationshipInsertHookMode` to `RelationshipHookMode`, wire
it up to on_replace execution, and use it in the
`Relationship::on_replace` hook.
# Objective
FilteredResource::get should return a Result instead of Option
Fixes#17480
---
## Migration Guide
Users will need to handle the different return type on
FilteredResource::get, FilteredResource::get_id,
FilteredResource::get_mut as it is now a Result not an Option.
# Objective
Currently experimenting with manually implementing
`Relationship`/`RelationshipTarget` to support associated edge data,
which means I need to replace the default hook implementations provided
by those traits. However, copying them over for editing revealed that
`UnsafeWorldCell::get_raw_command_queue` is `pub(crate)`, and I would
like to not have to clone the source collection, like the default impl.
So instead, I've taken to providing a safe abstraction for being able to
access entities and queue commands simultaneously.
## Solution
Added `World::entities_and_commands` and
`DeferredWorld::entities_and_commands`, which can be used like so:
```rust
let eid: Entity = /* ... */;
let (mut fetcher, mut commands) = world.entities_and_commands();
let emut = fetcher.get_mut(eid).unwrap();
commands.entity(eid).despawn();
```
## Testing
- Added a new test for each of the added functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Registering dynamic bundles was not possible for the user yet.
It is alone not very useful though as there are no methods to clone,
move or remove components via a `BundleId`. This could be a follow-up
work if this PR is approved and such a third (besides `T: Bundle` and
`ComponentId`(s)) API for structural operation is desired. I certainly
would use a hypothetical `EntityClonerBuilder::allow_by_bundle_id`.
I personally still would like this register method because I have a
`Bundles`-like custom data structure and I would like to not reinvent
the wheel. Then instead of having boxed `ComponentId` slices in my
collection I could look up explicit and required components there.
For reference scroll up to the typed version right above the new one.
